• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
ABIL
  • Home
  • About
  • ABIL Lawyers
    • North America
      • Canada
      • Mexico
      • United States
    • South America
      • Colombia
      • Peru
    • Europe
      • Austria
      • Belgium
      • France
      • Germany
      • Italy
      • Netherlands
      • Poland
      • Spain
      • Switzerland
      • Turkey
      • United Kingdom
    • Asia Pacific & Africa
      • Australia
      • Hong Kong
  • Global Immigration
    • North America
      • Canada
      • Mexico
      • United States
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Colombia
      • Peru
    • Europe
      • Austria
      • Belgium
      • France
      • Germany
      • Italy
      • Netherlands
      • Spain
      • Switzerland
      • Turkey
      • United Kingdom
    • Asia Pacific & Africa
      • Australia
      • China
      • Hong Kong
      • India
      • Japan
      • South Africa
  • Services
    • Corporate Services
    • Compliance Services
    • Global Immigration Services
    • Government Policy
    • Complex Cases
    • Investment Services
    • Litigation Services
    • Pro Bono Services
  • Industries
  • Resources
    • Blogs
    • News
    • Newsletters
    • Videos & Recordings
    • Articles
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 6, No. 11B • November 15, 2010

November 15, 2010/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. USCIS Issues Reminder on New Fees – The new fee schedule will take effect on Tuesday, November 23, 2010.

2. ETA Extends Comment Period on H-2B Wage Methodology Rule – The agency has extended the comment period until November 12, 2010.

3. DOS Final Rule Revises Exchange Student Regs – DOS is revising existing secondary school student regulations and is adopting a new training requirement for all organizational representatives who place and/or monitor students with host families.

4. DHS Extends TPS Designation for Somalia – DHS has extended the designation of Somalia for TPS through September 17, 2012.

5. New Publications and Items of Interest – New Publications and Items of Interest

6. Member News – Member News

7. Government Agency Links – Government Agency Links


Details:

1. USCIS Issues Reminder on New Fees

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a reminder that its new fee schedule will take effect on Tuesday, November 23, 2010. Applications or petitions postmarked or otherwise filed on or after this date must include the new fee or they will be rejected. As a practical matter, any applications filed after Friday, November 19 might be subject to the fee increases, depending on when the application is received.

USCIS published the new fee schedule in the Federal Register on September 24, 2010, following a review of public comments received after publication of the proposed rule this past summer. The new fee schedule increases application and petition fees by an average of about 10 percent but does not increase the naturalization application fee.

A table listing the old and new fees is available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=92c5e116de9eb210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD. The final rule is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-23725.pdf.

Back to Top


2. ETA Extends Comment Period on H-2B Wage Methodology Rule

On October 5, 2010, the Department of Labor’s Employment and Training Administration (ETA) issued a proposed rule governing the certification of the employment of nonimmigrant workers in temporary or seasonal non-agricultural employment and the enforcement of related obligations of employers. The proposed rule provided a comment period through November 4, 2010. The agency extended the comment period for an additional 8 days, to November 12, 2010.

The proposed rule would revise the methodology by which the Department calculates the H-2B prevailing wage. It would establish that the prevailing wage will be the highest of: (1) wages established under an agreed-upon collective bargaining agreement (CBA); (2) a wage rate established under the Davis-Bacon Act (DBA) or McNamara-O’Hara Service Contract Act (SCA) for that occupation in the area of intended employment; and (3) the arithmetic mean wage rate established by Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) for that occupation in the area of intended employment. The employer would be required to pay its workers at least the highest of the prevailing wage as determined by the National Processing Center (NPC) (currently the National Prevailing Wage Center), the federal minimum wage, the state minimum wage, or the local minimum wage.

The proposed rule also would eliminate the use of the current four-tiered wage structure that differentiates wage tiers by level of experience, education, and supervision required to perform the job duties. The Department proposes instead a single OES wage level for H-2B job opportunities based on the arithmetic mean of the OES wage data for the job opportunities in the area of intended employment.

The Department anticipates further rulemaking that will address other aspects of the H-2B temporary worker program. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on the proposed rule by November 12, 2010, using one of the methods set forth in the extension notice, which is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-27602.pdf.

 

Back to Top


3. DOS Final Rule Revises Exchange Student Regs

In a final rule effective November 26, 2010, the Department of State is revising existing secondary school student regulations regarding the screening, selection, school enrollment, orientation, and quality assurance monitoring of exchange students, host families, and field staff. The Department also is adopting a new training requirement for all organizational representatives who place and/or monitor students with host families.

A proposed requirement to conduct FBI fingerprint-based criminal background checks will not be implemented now. The agency said it continues to examine that proposed requirement and a subsequent final rule will be forthcoming.

The final rule governs the designated exchange visitor programs under which foreign secondary school students (ages 15 to 18 1/2) may study in the U.S. at accredited public or private secondary schools for an academic semester or year while living with American host families or residing at accredited U.S. boarding schools.

Compliance with a new requirement for a mandated training module for local coordinator training will not be required until the development of an online training platform is completed and launched, which is anticipated to be in January 2011. A subsequent Federal Register notice will be published when that occurs.

The final rule is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-27200.pdf.

Back to Top


4. DHS Extends TPS Designation for Somalia

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has extended the designation of Somalia for temporary protected status (TPS) for 18 months, from its current expiration date of March 17, 2011, through September 17, 2012. DHS determined that an 18-month extension is warranted because conditions in Somalia prompting the TPS designation continue to exist. Armed conflict in Somalia is ongoing. Due to that conflict and “other extraordinary and temporary conditions,” requiring the return of eligible individuals with TPS to Somalia “would pose a serious threat to their personal safety,” the agency said.

The notice also sets forth procedures necessary for nationals of Somalia (or those having no nationality who last habitually resided in Somalia) with TPS to re-register and to apply for an extension of their employment authorization documents (EADs) with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). Re-registration is limited to persons who previously registered for TPS under the designation of Somalia and whose applications have been granted or remain pending. Certain nationals of Somalia (or those having no nationality who last habitually resided in Somalia) who have not previously applied for TPS may be eligible to apply under the late initial registration provisions.

USCIS will issue new EADs with a September 17, 2012, expiration date to eligible TPS beneficiaries who timely re-register and apply for EADs. The 60-day re-registration period begins November 2, 2010, and will run until January 3, 2011.

The USCIS notice is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-27613.pdf. A related Q&A is available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=1dffae8ac980c210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD. Additional information on TPS for Somalians can be found at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=928f3e4d77d73210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=928f3e4d77d73210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD.

Back to Top


5. New Publications and Items of Interest

GAO report on closed civil criminal cases involving fraud and abuse against H-2B workers. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) recently released a report, “H-2B Visa Program: Closed Civil Criminal Cases Illustrate Instances of H-2B Workers Being Targets of Fraud and Abuse.” The GAO reviewed 10 closed cases over the last five years that involved H-2B employers and recruiters who violated various labor laws or settled allegations of violations outside of court. Violations included employers failing to pay promised wages, overtime, or both; employers charging H-2B workers exorbitant fees; and employers and recruiters submitting fraudulent documentation to government officials. For example, in one case H-2B workers became indebted to their employer through a series of arbitrary charges. The employer then forced workers to take second jobs at local fast food restaurants to pay these debts. GAO personnel found that most recruiters they called or visited posing as prospective H-2B employers and workers did not encourage the GAO’s undercover agents to violate program rules. Of the 18 recruiters in multiple states the GAO contacted, H-2B recruiters on three calls provided suggestions on how to circumvent program rules, such as providing “good excuses” to help “weed out” prospective U.S. workers or recouping costs through “off-the-book” transactions to avoid restrictions on pay deductions. Additionally, the GAO found that H-2B workers contacted during the site visits to their housing locations were generally pleased with their living and working conditions. However, at one location the H-2B workers were afraid to speak with outside individuals for fear of retaliation from their employer.

The GAO report is available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d101053.pdf.

New packet for naturalized U.S. citizens. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services announced that all new citizens will receive a U.S. Citizenship Welcome Packet during their naturalization oath ceremony. Along with practical information on applying for a U.S. passport, establishing and obtaining Social Security records, getting involved in the local community, and petitioning for family members, the packet includes a congratulatory letter from the President; a flier on important information for new citizens; the Citizen’s Almanac, a pocket-size edition of the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution, a passport application, a naturalization certificate holder, and a voter’s guide to federal elections.

Naturalization rates among IRCA immigrants. The Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Immigration Statistics has released a fact sheet, “Naturalization Rates Among IRCA Immigrants: A 2009 Update.” The fact sheet presents various statistics on those who immigrated to the U.S. under the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA). Among other things, the data show that immigrants who obtained permanent residence through IRCA provisions had lower rates of naturalization than immigrants who obtained status through other provisions. The fact sheet is available at http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statistics/publications/irca-natz-fs-2009.pdf.

J-1 final rule guidance. The American Immigration Council’s International Exchange Center has released a practice advisory on the final rule for J-1 trainee and intern programs, available at http://www.internationalexchangecenter.org/sites/default/files/images/Practice_Advisory_Final_rule.pdf. The practice advisory notes that the significant changes under the final rule include:

  1. Clarification of the required academic background for interns.
  2. Elimination of the requirement that sponsors must obtain a Dun & Bradstreet report on all host companies.
  3. Clarification that social work falling under Public Administration and Social Service Professions is allowed; clinical social work is not allowed.
  4. Clarification that dental services are not allowed.
  5. Elimination of training or internships for counter help positions.
  6. Clarification that telephone interviews are appropriate when video conferencing is not available for the purpose of screening English language proficiency.

Immigration, offshoring and jobs. The National Bureau of Economic Research has published “Immigration, Offshoring and American Jobs.” The paper predicts that while cheaper offshoring reduces the share of natives among less skilled workers, cheaper immigration reduces the share of offshored jobs. Moreover, since both phenomena have a positive “cost-savings” effect, they may leave unaffected, or even increase, total native employment of less-skilled workers. The paper also predicts that offshoring will push natives toward jobs that are more intensive in communication-interactive skills and away from those that are manual and routine-intensive. The authors tested their predictions on data for 58 U.S. manufacturing industries over the period 2000-2007 and found evidence that immigration has a positive net effect on native employment, while offshoring has no effect on it. They also found that offshoring has pushed natives toward more communication-intensive tasks and has pushed immigrants away from them. The paper is available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w16439 to eligible entities or subscribers.

Back to Top


6. Member News

Steve Clark (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-clark.cfm) co-chaired the American Immigration Lawyers Association’s conference on PERM in New Orleans on October 22, 2010. He led a discussion of best practices on drafting labor certification applications, including dealing with employees who have educational degrees that differ from U.S. educational requirements.

Kehrela Hodkinson (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-hodkinson.cfm) participated as a panelist in a presentation, “Non-Immigrant Visa Inadmissibility and Waivers to the U.S.,” during the American Immigration Lawyers Association’s Rome District Chapter Autumn Conference in Paris, France.

Charles Kuck (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-kuck.cfm) recently posted a new blog entry, “The Next Goal – Eviscerating the 14th Amendment.” The blog discusses the effort to eliminate so-called “birthright” citizenship. The blog is available at http://ailaleadershipblog.org/2010/11/04/the-next-goal-eviscerating-the-14th-amendment/.

Sharon Mehlman (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-mehlman.cfm) spoke on November 12, 2010, at the American Immigration Lawyers Association’s 23rd Annual California Chapters Conference in Monterey on a USCIS update panel covering the Service Centers, local office issues, lockboxes, and the NCSC.

Cyrus Mehta (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-mehta.cfm) participated as a panelist on the Child Status Protection Act at the American Immigration Lawyers Association’s Texas, New Mexico, Oklahoma Chapter conference at Playa del Carmen, Mexico on November 5, 2010.

Angelo Paparelli (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-paparelli.cfm) recently posted a new blog entry, “Rethinking Immigration: California Dreamin’.” Among other things, Mr. Paparelli notes that “[t]he competitive position of the U.S. will continue to slide until improvements to the legal immigration system are made that enable innovators, entrepreneurs and strivers to grow the economy.” The blog is available at http://www.nationofimmigrators.com/?p=368.

Steve Trow (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-trow.cfm) chaired a conference on U.S. Immigration and Citizenship Planning for High Net Worth Clients organized by Moodys LLP Tax Advisors in Calgary, Alberta on October 26, 2010. His presentations at the conference covered Nonimmigrant Visas, Permanent Resident Status, EB-5 Immigrant Investor Visas, Green Cards and the Exit Tax, Spotting and Advising Accidental American Citizens, and Terminating American Citizenship.

Stephen Yale-Loehr (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-loehr.cfm) was quoted in the October 30, 2010, edition of the Washington Post. An article about the Arizona immigration law controversy, “Appeals Court To Mull States’ Role in Immigration,” discussed “preemption,” where federal law trumps state law. Mr. Yale-Loehr said the Arizona statute “puts that issue front and center.”

Mr. Yale-Loehr also was quoted in the November 10, 2010, edition of Slate Magazine online. An article entitled “Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor, Your Huddled Entrepreneurs” discussed EB-5 visa legislation, immigrant entrepreneurs, and the nexus between immigration by entrepreneurs starting new companies and job creation in the U.S. The article notes that many visas for entrepreneurs currently are temporary. “We don’t have a true startup visa on the green-card side of the immigration equation,” Mr. Yale-Loehr noted.

Back to Top


7. Government Agency Links

Follow these links to access current processing times of the USCIS Service Centers and the Department of Labor, or the Department of State’s latest Visa Bulletin with the most recent cut-off dates for visa numbers:

USCIS Service Center processing times online: https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/processTimesDisplay.do

Department of Labor processing times and information on backlogs: http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/times.cfm

Department of State Visa Bulletin: http://travel.state.gov/visa/bulletin/bulletin_1360.html

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2010-11-15 00:00:412019-09-08 00:58:41News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 6, No. 11B • November 15, 2010

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 6, No. 11A • November 01, 2010

November 01, 2010/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. WHD Plans Nationwide Audit of Independent Contractor Misclassifications – Targeted industries may include may include agriculture, construction, distribution, food processing, hospitality, janitorial services, landscaping, manufacturing, restaurants, and sanitation.

2. District Court Finds NY Education Law Limiting Pharmacist Licenses to U.S. Citizens, LPRs Unconstitutional – A New York education law was found unconstitutional because it violated the plaintiffs’ rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution and encroached on federal immigration authority.

3. USCIS Designates Two AAO Decisions As Binding Precedent – The first decision holds that an employment-based petition must be “valid” initially if it is to “remain valid with respect to a new job,” and the second clarifies the definition of employment by an “American firm or corporation.”

4. State Dept. Seeks OMB Approval, Comments on Exchange Visitor Program Annual Reports – Annual reports will be submitted to DOS electronically “as soon as the mechanism for doing so is approved and in place.”

5. USCIS Opens New Office in Holtsville, Long Island – The full-service office has the capacity to serve approximately 400 residents of Nassau, Suffolk, and Queens Counties per day, including fingerprinting.

6. ABIL Global: India Changes Work-Related Visa Rules – In an effort to protect India’s non-technical workers and attract highly skilled foreign workers, the Indian Ministry of Home Affairs has issued an order and released a new FAQ.

7. ABIL Global: Canadian Regulatory Changes Will Affect Canadian Employers, Temporary Foreign Workers – Various changes to Canada’s Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations will take effect on April 1, 2011, affecting both Canadian employers and their temporary foreign workers.

8. Member News – Member News

9. Government Agency Links – Government Agency Links


Details:

1. WHD Plans Nationwide Audit of Independent Contractor Misclassifications

The Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division (WHD) reportedly plans a nationwide audit this fall of misclassifications of employees as independent contractors, and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement sent notices of inspection to employers nationwide in September 2010. WHD and ICE are working together on the independent contractor issue, and some analysts believe that WHD may be providing leads to ICE on potential Fair Labor Standards Act violators.

It is unclear which industries are targeted, but it is expected that they may include agriculture, construction, distribution, food processing, hospitality, janitorial services, landscaping, manufacturing, restaurants, and sanitation, according to the Society for Human Resource Management.

The Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers (ABIL) recommends preparing for audits in advance and contacting your ABIL member for guidance on how to classify workers as employees or independent contractors, and how to conduct an internal audit to correct errors or omissions in I-9 work authorization verification forms and other relevant documentation.

Back to Top


2. District Court Finds NY Education Law Limiting Pharmacist Licenses to U.S. Citizens, LPRs Unconstitutional

The U.S. District Court for New York ruled in a consolidated case on September 29, 2010, that a New York education law was unconstitutional because it violated the plaintiffs’ rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution and encroached on federal immigration authority.

The plaintiffs were 26 otherwise qualified pharmacists with temporary authorization to work in the U.S. Twenty-two of them had obtained H-1B visas. Most had applied for permanent residence and all had remained in the U.S. in compliance with federal immigration laws while their cases were pending. New York Education Law § 6805(1)(6) provides that “[t]o qualify for a pharmacist’s license, an applicant shall…be a United States citizen or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States.” The law excludes, among others, those who have received federal authorization to work in the U.S. temporarily.

Among other things, the court said:

The theory is that courts must be wary of state laws that exploit aliens’ political powerlessness by denying them the fruits of their societal contributions. Here, the State does not explain why this theory would apply any less to nonimmigrants, who also work, pay taxes, contribute to society, and have no political voice while they remain in this country. At one point, the State seems to suggest that non-LPR classifications should not receive strict scrutiny because non-LPRs have a different “constitutional status” by virtue of their weaker ties to the country….But what does it mean to say that nonimmigrants have a different “constitutional status” than LPRs, or that nonimmigrants “need not” be protected to the same extent as LPRs? The Supreme Court has already established that all aliens, even undocumented aliens, have rights under the equal protection clause.

The court pointed out that New York purported to ameliorate the dangers posed by transient or judgment-proof pharmacists through § 6805(1)(6), which was aimed at only a tiny subclass of pharmacists, instead of imposing generally applicable insurance or similar malpractice-related requirements upon the entire profession. The state also did not put forth any evidence that transience among New York pharmacists threatened public health or that nonimmigrant pharmacists, as a class, were considerably more transient than LPR and U.S. citizen pharmacists. As a consequence, the court said, the law did nothing to reduce the dangers of transience among citizen and LPR pharmacists while at the same time excluding longtime nonimmigrant residents, many of whom will become LPRs as soon as their pending green card applications are processed. “The question is not close; under any form of heightened scrutiny, § 6805(1)(6) fails,” the court concluded.

The decision is available at http://engnishimura.com/files/PhamacistLawUnconstitutional.pdf.

Back to Top


3. USCIS Designates Two AAO Decisions As Binding Precedent

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on October 20, 2010, that it has issued two decisions from the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) as binding precedent for the agency.

The first decision, Matter of Al Wazzan, affirms USCIS’s denial of an application to adjust status to permanent residence and holds that an employment-based petition must be “valid” initially if it is to “remain valid with respect to a new job.” The second decision, Matter of Chawathe, reverses USCIS’s denial of an application to preserve residence for naturalization purposes and clarifies the definition of employment by an “American firm or corporation.”

Matter of Al Wazzan states that to be considered “valid,” a petition must have been filed for a person who is entitled to the requested classification and a USCIS officer must have approved the petition. An unadjudicated immigrant visa petition is not made “valid” merely through the act of filing the petition with USCIS or through the passage of 180 days, even though the law states that an employment-based immigrant visa petition remains valid with respect to a new job if the beneficiary’s application for adjustment of status has been filed and remains unadjudicated for 180 days.

Matter of Chawathe states that for purposes of establishing the requisite continuous residence in naturalization proceedings, a publicly held corporation may be deemed an “American firm or corporation” if the applicant establishes that the corporation is both incorporated in the U.S. and trades its stock exclusively on U.S. stock exchange markets. The decision also states that when an applicant’s employer is a publicly held corporation incorporated in the U.S. and trading its stock exclusively on U.S. stock markets, the applicant need not demonstrate the nationality of the corporation by establishing the nationality of those persons who own more than 51 percent of the stock of that firm. The decision further states that even if the director has some doubt as to the truth, if the petitioner submits relevant, probative, and credible evidence that leads the director to believe that the claim is “more likely than not” or “probably” true, the applicant has satisfied the standard of proof. If the director can articulate a material doubt, he or she may request additional evidence or, if that doubt leads the director to believe that the claim is probably not true, may deny the application or petition, the decision states.

Matter of Al Wazzan is available at http://www.justice.gov/eoir/vll/intdec/vol25/3699.pdf, and Matter of Chawathe is available at http://www.justice.gov/eoir/vll/intdec/vol25/3700.pdf.

Back to Top


4. State Dept. Seeks OMB Approval, Comments on Exchange Visitor Program Annual Reports

The Department of State (DOS) has sent for Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval a notice and request for comments on annual reports required from designated exchange visitor program sponsors to assist DOS in overseeing and administering the J-1 visa program. The reports provide statistical data on the number of exchange participants an organization has sponsored per category of exchange, a summary of the activities in which exchange visitors were engaged, and an evaluation of the program’s effectiveness. Program sponsors include government agencies, academic institutions, and private sector not-for-profit and for-profit entities. The estimated number of respondents annually is 1,460.

Annual reports are completed through the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS), printed and signed by a sponsor official, and sent to DOS by mail or fax. DOS said it is working with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to expand SEVIS functions and enable the collection of electronic signatures. Annual reports will be submitted to DOS electronically “as soon as the mechanism for doing so is approved and in place,” the agency said. DHS announced a delay in implementing SEVIS II in April 2010. Phase one, the creation of customer accounts and the migration of school and sponsor records, was planned to start in March 2010, and phase two, full operating capability, was planned to deploy in October. DHS said a final decision on the schedule has not been reached, but confirmed that SEVIS II will not be deployed this year.

Comments or requests for additional information may be sent to the offices listed in the OMB notice, which is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-26381.pdf. For details on the SEVIS II delay, see http://www.ice.gov/sevis/sevisii/sevisii_update_032010.htm.

Back to Top


5. USCIS Opens New Office in Holtsville, Long Island

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently announced the opening of a new full-service field office in Holtsville, Long Island, New York. The office has the capacity to serve approximately 400 residents of Nassau, Suffolk, and Queens Counties per day, including fingerprinting.

The announcement is available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=22a20d1fd9bab210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD.

Back to Top


6. ABIL Global: India Changes Work-Related Visa Rules

In an effort to protect India’s lesser skilled workers and attract highly skilled foreign workers, the Indian Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has issued an order and released a new FAQ (frequently asked questions) document stating that employment visas are intended for foreigners desiring to come to India to work if the applicant is a highly skilled and/or qualified professional engaged or appointed by a company, organization, or industry undertaking in India on a contract or employment basis.

Employment visas will not be granted for positions for which qualified Indians are available, the FAQ states. Also, employment visas will not be granted for “routine, ordinary or secretarial/clerical jobs.” The foreign national must seek to visit India for employment in a company, firm, or organization registered in India or for employment in a foreign company, firm, or organization engaged in the “execution of some project in India.” Further, the FAQ states, the foreign national being sponsored for an employment visa in any sector should draw a salary above US $25,000 per year, with the exception of ethnic cooks, language teachers (other than English) and translators, and staff working for the “concerned Embassy/High Commission in India.”

The MHA also has announced the elimination of the prior maximum of 1% of the total workforce, or up to 20, for each Indian company that sponsors foreign workers.

The employment visa must be issued from the country of origin or country of domicile of the foreigner, provided the period of permanent residence of the applicant in that country is more than 2 years.

Documentation pertaining to the proposed employment, such as registration of the company under the Companies Act, proof of registration of the firm in the State Industries Department or the Export Promotion Council concerned, or any recognized promotional body in the field of industry and trade, will be reviewed to decide the category of visa that may be issued.

The name of the sponsoring employer or organization must be clearly stipulated in the visa sticker.

The following categories of foreign nationals are also eligible for employment visas provided they meet the basic conditions for an employment visa:

(i) Foreign nationals coming to India as consultants on a contract for whom the Indian company pays a fixed remuneration (this may not be in the form of a monthly salary).

(ii) Foreign artists engaged to conduct regular performances for the duration of an employment contract given by hotels, clubs, or other organizations.

(iii) Foreign nationals coming to India to take up employment as coaches of national or state-level teams or reputed sports clubs.

(iv) Foreign sportsmen who are given contracts for a specified period by Indian clubs or organizations.

(v) Self-employed foreign nationals coming to India for providing engineering, medical, accounting, legal or other such highly skilled services in their capacity as independent consultants, provided the provision of such services by foreign nationals is permitted under law.

(vi) Foreign language teachers and interpreters.

(vii) Foreign specialist chefs.

(viii) Foreign engineers or technicians coming to India to install and commission equipment, machines, or tools under the terms of a contract for the supply of such equipment, machines, or tools.

(ix) Foreign nationals deputed for providing technical support or services, or transfer of know-how or services, for which the Indian company pays fees or royalties to the foreign company.

Regarding the duration of the employment visa, the rules have different validity dates depending on the employment arrangement. These are summarized as follows:

(i) A foreign technician/expert coming to India under a bilateral agreement between the Indian government and the foreign government, or pursuant to a collaboration agreement that has been approved by the Indian government, may be granted a multiple employment visa for the duration of the agreement, or for a period of five years, whichever is less.

(ii) Highly skilled foreign personnel being employed in the IT software and IT-enabled sectors may receive a multiple entry employment visa with a validity of up to three years or for the term of assignment, whichever is less.

Applicants who are not covered under any of these two arrangements may obtain a multiple entry employment visa for up to two years or the term of assignment, whichever is less.

Finally, the rules provide for extensions beyond the initial visa validity period, up to a total period of five years from the date of issue of the initial employment visa, on a year-to-year basis, subject to the individual’s good conduct, production of necessary documents in support of continued employment, filing of income tax returns and to there being no adverse security inputs relating to the foreign national. The period of extension shall not exceed five years from the date of issue of the initial employment visa.

The FAQ, which contains additional details on business and work-related visas issued by India, is available at http://www.mha.nic.in/pdfs/work_visa_faq.pdf.

Back to Top


7. ABIL Global: Canadian Regulatory Changes Will Affect Canadian Employers, Temporary Foreign Workers

Various changes to Canada’s Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations will take effect on April 1, 2011, affecting both Canadian employers and their temporary foreign workers. These changes are intended to:

  • Reduce the opportunity for exploitation of temporary foreign workers by employers and third-party agents;
  • Ensure greater employer accountability mechanisms, including a denial of service provision, thereby encouraging greater adherence by employers to the terms and conditions of their job offers with respect to wages, working conditions and occupations; and
  • Clarify that employment facilitated through the Temporary Foreign Worker Program is meant to be temporary in nature.

The changes include:

Rigorous assessment of the genuineness of the employment offer. The amendments establish specific factors to assess the genuineness of an employer’s offer of employment to a foreign worker both in Labour Market Opinion (LMO) cases and in LMO-exempt cases. These factors include:

  • Whether the offer is made by an employer that is actively engaged in the business with respect to which the offer is made;
  • Whether the offer is consistent with reasonable employment needs of the employer;
  • Whether the terms of the offer are terms that the employer is reasonably able to fulfill; and
  • The past compliance of the employer, or any person who recruited the foreign national for the employer, with the federal or provincial laws that regulate employment, or the recruiting of employees, in the province in which it is intended that the foreign national work.

Ban on employers for noncompliance with a previous LMO. The amendments will render an employer ineligible to seek a work permit on behalf of a foreign worker unless, during the period beginning two years before the initial request for an LMO is made to Service Canada or, in the case of an LMO-exempt work permit, beginning two years before the work permit application is received by Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) or the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA):

  • The employer provided each of its foreign workers with wages, working conditions and employment consistent with the wages, working conditions and occupation set out in the employer’s offer of employment; or the failure to do so was justified.

Justifications include:

  • A change in federal or provincial law;
  • A change in the provisions of a collective agreement;
  • The implementation of measures by the employer in response to a dramatic change in economic conditions that directly affected the employer, provided that the measures were not directed disproportionately at foreign nationals employed by the employer;
  • An error in interpretation made in good faith by the employer with respect to its obligations to a foreign national, if the employer subsequently provided compensation or made sufficient attempts to do so to all foreign nationals who suffered a disadvantage as a result of the error;
  • An unintentional accounting or administrative error made by the employer, if the employer subsequently provided compensation or made sufficient attempts to do so to all foreign nationals who suffered a disadvantage as a result of the error; or
  • Circumstances similar to those set out above.

The assessment is undertaken when a new LMO is requested or, in the case of an LMO-exempt work permit application, when the work permit application is received by CIC/CBSA. Employers must review all LMO applications to ensure compliance during the two-year period preceding April 2011. An internal immigration audit is recommended.

List of banned employers posted on CIC Web site. The amendments authorize CIC to maintain a list of banned employers on its Web site, listing the names and addresses of each employer and the date that the determination was made. Service Canada will not issue an LMO and CIC/CBSA will not issue a work permit for any employer on the list.

Four-year cap for most temporary foreign workers. The amendments provide for a cumulative four-year cap for most foreign workers. However, exemptions from the four-year cap exist in the following situations:

  • The foreign worker intends to perform work that would create or maintain significant social, cultural or economic benefits or opportunities for Canadian citizens or permanent residents. Therefore, work permits based on LMO exemptions, such as significant benefit to Canada and intra-company transferees, along with other LMO exemptions, will be exempt from the four-year cap.
  • The foreign worker intends to perform work pursuant to an international agreement between Canada and one or more countries. Work permits issued under international agreements such as the North American Free Trade Agreement, the General Agreement on Trade in Services, the Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement, or the Peru Free Trade Agreement will be exempt from the four-year cap.
  • A foreign worker who has reached the four-year cap is not necessarily required to leave Canada. However, the foreign worker would not be eligible for a work permit even under another category. He or she may be permitted to apply for status under a non-work category such as that of a visitor or student.

Back to Top


8. Member News

Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer received the highest ranking (Tier 1) for the Immigration Law category in both New York and Philadelphia in the first-ever U.S. News and World Report “Best Law Firm” rankings. See http://bestlawfirms.usnews.com/. H. Ronald Klasko (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-klasko.cfm) is a member of the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers.

Angelo Paparelli (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-paparelli.cfm) recently posted a new blog entry, “The Immigration Log In Our Eyes.” The blog is available at http://www.nationofimmigrators.com/?p=359.

Charles Kuck (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-kuck.cfm) recently posted a new blog entry, “What Is Going On in Nevada With Immigration?” The blog is available at http://musingsonimmigration.blogspot.com/2010/10/what-is-going-on-in-nevada-with.html.

Mr. Kuck recently conducted a radio interview with Mr. Paparelli about the immigration system. The interview is available at http://www.radiosandysprings.com/podcasts/ImmigrationHourOct26.2010.mp3.

Stephen Yale-Loehr (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-loehr.cfm) will speak about the prospects for immigration reform after the mid-term elections at 1:30 p.m. on November 15, 2010, at the National Press Club in Washington, DC.

Back to Top


9. Government Agency Links

Follow these links to access current processing times of the USCIS Service Centers and the Department of Labor, or the Department of State’s latest Visa Bulletin with the most recent cut-off dates for visa numbers:

USCIS Service Center processing times online: https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/processTimesDisplay.do

Department of Labor processing times and information on backlogs: http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/times.cfm

Department of State Visa Bulletin: http://travel.state.gov/visa/bulletin/bulletin_1360.html

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2010-11-01 00:00:582019-09-08 01:03:06News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 6, No. 11A • November 01, 2010

Archive

  • July 2020
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006

ABIL is a corporation with over 40 top-rated immigration law firms and 1,500+ professionals.

News

  • BRAZIL: Accepting Work Authorization Applications Thorugh New Digital Certificate System
  • News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 15, No. 9D • September 22, 2019
  • News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 15, No. 9C • September 15, 2019
  • News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 15, No. 9B • September 08, 2019

Sign Up for our Newsletters

Sign up for our Immigration Insider & Global Updates Newsletters

Select list(s) to subscribe to


By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers, 11 Dupont Circle, N.W., Washington, DC, 20036, https://www.abil.com. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact
© Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers (ABIL) All Rights Reserved 2023
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Home
  • About
  • ABIL Lawyers
  • Global Immigration
  • Services
  • Industries
  • Resources
  • Contact
Scroll to top