• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
ABIL
  • Home
  • About
  • ABIL Lawyers
    • North America
      • Canada
      • Costa Rica
      • Mexico
      • United States
    • South America
      • Colombia
    • Europe
      • Austria
      • Belgium
      • France
      • Germany
      • Italy
      • Netherlands
      • Poland
      • Spain
      • Switzerland
      • Turkey
      • United Kingdom
    • Asia Pacific & Africa
      • Australia
      • Hong Kong
  • Global Immigration
    • North America
      • Canada
      • Costa Rica
      • Mexico
      • United States
    • South America
      • Colombia
    • Europe
      • Austria
      • Belgium
      • France
      • Germany
      • Italy
      • Netherlands
      • Poland
      • Spain
      • Switzerland
      • Turkey
      • United Kingdom
    • Asia Pacific & Africa
      • Australia
      • China
      • India
      • Japan
  • Services
    • Complex Cases
    • Compliance
    • Corporate Immigration
    • Foreign Investment
    • Global Immigration
    • Government Policy
    • Litigation
    • Pro Bono
  • Industries
  • Resources
    • Blogs
    • News
    • Newsletters
    • Videos & Recordings
    • Articles
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

ABIL Global Update • August 2020

August 01, 2020/in Global Immigration Update /by ABIL

In this issue:

1. EMPLOYER SPONSORSHIP CRITERIA: AN OVERVIEW – This article provides an overview of policies and procedures related to employer sponsorship criteria in Italy and Turkey.

2. BELGIUM – Belgium has added to the list of categories of travelers with an essential function or need, and has issued an update on restrictions on non-essential travel due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

3. CANADA – The government has made changes to the Québec Experience Class (PEQ) program.

4. GERMANY – The COVID-19 pandemic thwarts a new skilled immigration law.

5. ITALY – This article summarizes issues related to immigration in Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic.

6. RUSSIA – This article provides updates on Russian COVID-19 policies and procedures related to immigration.

7. UNITED KINGDOM – The Home Office has published further details on the new post-Brexit immigration system. Also, there was an update on international travelers arriving in the UK.

8. New Publications and Items of Interest – New Publications and Items of Interest

9. ABIL Member / Firm News – ABIL Member / Firm News

Download:

ABIL Global Immigration Update – August 2020


1. EMPLOYER SPONSORSHIP CRITERIA: AN OVERVIEW

This article provides an overview of policies and procedures on employer sponsorship criteria in Italy and Turkey.

Italy

To sponsor a work permit application in Italy, a company/entity must:

  • Be registered with the Italian Business Register (Registro Imprese) or equivalent (see )
  • Be in good standing (many Immigration Offices require that the latest approved financials do not show a loss)
  • Provide proof of compliance with payment of taxes and social security charges
  • Provide the number of employees when requested (even though this is not specifically set forth by the law, some Immigration Offices look at the number of employees working for the company)

Among the sponsoring company’s obligations/commitments undertaken when filing a work permit application, it must specifically indicate in the application:

  • Whether it has enforced any collective dismissal for reduction of personnel during the last 12 months
  • That it does not have any workers under ordinary or extraordinary redundancies with the same skills and characteristics of the worker on assignment
  • That the foreign worker’s wage is not lower than that of a local employee hired in the same job position/level
  • Any variations in working conditions
  • That the worker is provided a suitable accommodation
  • That the expenses for the worker’s repatriation, if applicable, will be covered in full

Turkey

A Turkish work permit cannot be self-sponsored; it must be sponsored by a Turkish legal entity (a joint stock company, joint venture, limited liability company, or liaison office), with the exception of domestic workers, who may be sponsored by the appropriate individual. A Turkish entity that sponsors the work permit application (and acts as the local employer) must meet certain requirements that must be maintained over the life of the work permit. The employer must have at least five Turkish citizen employees per registered worksite per foreign applicant as evidenced on payroll records (termed the “5:1 ratio”), and the employer’s “paid in capital” cannot be less than 100,000 Turkish Lira (TL). In the alternative to the capital requirement, the employer can show a gross (assumedly annual) sales amounting to 800,000 TL annually, or exports with a gross annual value of USD $250,000. Certain exemptions for the 5:1 ratio exist but are not often granted by the Ministry. The employer must maintain the criteria throughout the work permit period.

As of February 26, 2018, any sponsor of a work permit must have an e-signature tool issued by the government-designated agencies. This means that no work permit applications can be logged in without the use of a company-sponsor e-signature tool. Each company’s designated social security e-notification authority—who is also the e-signature holder—must complete a Ministry of Labor company registration through the online system to pursue work permit applications.

Back to Top


2. BELGIUM

Belgium has added to the list of categories of travelers with an essential function or need, and has issued an update on restrictions on non-essential travel due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

List of categories of essential travelers. Belgium has extended, effective July 2, 2020, the list of specific categories of travelers with an essential function or need to “4 categories: mariners, persons attending meetings of international organisations, students and highly qualified personnel whose work cannot be carried out at a distance (taking into account the visa procedures currently in force).”

Furthermore, EU+ citizens and third-country nationals legally residing in the European Union, as well as their family members, can travel wherever they wish in the EU+, including Belgium, and no longer only in their country of residence. The Belgium government listed “EU+” countries in a public statement from the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Philippe Goffin (https://diplomatie.belgium.be/en/newsroom/news/2020/non_essential_travel_outside_eu_no_major_changes_before_7_july).

“Highly qualified personnel whose work cannot be carried out at a distance” refers to the category “highly qualified third-country workers if their employment is necessary from an economic perspective and the work cannot be postponed or performed abroad” as mentioned in the EU Council Recommendation 9208/20, dated June 30, 2020. For the time being, the Belgian authorities have limited “highly qualified personnel whose work cannot be carried out at a distance” to Blue Card holders, who will receive a visa type D with the code B29. A Belgian visa type D contains a code B (number), indicating the underlying legal basis for the visa D.

The EU Blue Card is issued in Belgium to highly qualified employees, but it is not the only permit for highly qualified/skilled employees, and definitely not the most popular one. Many highly qualified/skilled employees hold a single permit that allows them to obtain a visa type D with the code B34. Some observers have said that the current limitation to Blue Card holders does not make sense. Despite pressure from the business community to include single permit holders, as of this writing, there was no final decision yet.

Restrictions on non-essential travel. As of this writing, restrictions on non-essential travel were still in place due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and this was not expected to change immediately. The Belgian press reported that the federal government decided not to reopen the borders for “white-listed” (safe) countries because the health situation in nine countries would not allow this and there was a lack of reciprocity with respect to the other countries on the list. Reportedly, if Belgium’s neighboring countries (France, Germany, Netherlands, Luxembourg) would allow entry to travelers from the white-listed countries, Belgium would implement unannounced border checks to prevent these travelers from entering Belgium. Formal confirmation of this decision by the federal government was awaited.

The 15 white-listed countries included Algeria, Australia, Canada, Georgia, Japan, Montenegro, Morocco, New Zealand, Rwanda, Serbia, South Korea, Thailand, Tunisia, Uruguay, and China (subject to confirmation of reciprocity).

The Public Health Passenger Locator Form must be completed by every passenger on flights from outside the Schengen Area to Belgium. On arrival, the travel must hand over the form to the designated authorities at the border. Information on travel to Belgium is available at https://dofi.ibz.be/sites/dvzoe/EN/Pages/Travel-to-Belgium.aspx. The form is at https://dofi.ibz.be/sites/dvzoe/EN/Documents/BELGIUM_PassengerLocatorForm_ENG.pdf.

Back to Top


3. CANADA

The government has made changes to the Québec Experience Class (PEQ) program.

For the past 10 years, workers and students in Québec had the choice between two permanent residence streams: the expedited ” Québec Experience Class” (Programme de l’Expérience Québecoise, or PEQ) and the regular Québec skilled worker program. While the former had simple eligibility criteria based on knowledge of French and either 1 year of qualifying work in Québec or completion of certain Québec diplomas, as well as 1-month processing times, the latter is based on a points system with heavier documentation requirements and processing times of anywhere between 1 and 4 years. In both cases, applicants were granted the “Québec Selection Certificate” (Certificat de Sélection du Québec, or CSQ) and then needed to apply to Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) to undergo background and medical checks and ultimately were granted permanent residence (PR). Historically, this second step took between 13 and 24 months.

To put it in a nutshell, at its fastest, applicants to the PEQ were able to be granted PR within 14 months. Comparatively, this is still longer than federal programs under Express Entry where PR can be granted within 6 months, but the PEQ was competitive because the CSQ granted applicants, and employers, the possibility to apply for closed bridging work permits. All in all, it was a system that worked and that employers had integrated as part of their employee retention strategy.

As of July 22, 2020, new selection conditions apply to candidates who submit a PEQ application, including increases in work experience and language requirements. Transitional measures are also planned. For more information on the PEQ, see https://www.immigration-quebec.gouv.qc.ca/en/immigrate-settle/students/stay-quebec/application-csq/students-peq/index.html.

Back to Top


4. GERMANY

The COVID-19 pandemic thwarts a new skilled immigration law.

When Germany agreed to change its skilled immigration laws in 2019 to facilitate the immigration of skilled employees from abroad, its economy was thriving and the labor market was robust and on the edge of turning into an employee market. IT professionals, engineers, and health care workers were difficult to find and in high demand. Plumbers, mechanics, and many other trades also reported skills shortages. Accordingly, Germany adjusted its immigration laws to allow the migration of professionals with vocational training to Germany and implementing a new fast-track option.

With the new law taking effect on March 1, 2020, all was set to enhance employment-related immigration to Germany. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, all immigration came to a sudden halt in mid-March. Schengen borders closed, visa application centers went into lockdown, and many government authorities began working from home offices. Travel was suspended across the globe.

An immigration lawyer’s nightmare of ceasing travel turned quickly into an immigration lawyer’s challenge when many clients needed support, with employees stranded abroad or foreign staff in Germany needing extensions when authorities were hardly accessible. The government issued new laws and regulations to address the COVID-19 crisis frequently, with lawyers slogging behind in the attempt to stay on top, interpret the hastily issued rules, and find reliable angles for their clients. The unpredictability of the situation added to the general disturbance.

But some of the most interesting and moving cases also occurred during the pandemic: With attorney support, the employer of a person who had terminal cancer managed to assist her Chinese parents with visiting their daughter in Germany—in the midst of the pandemic—with the support of the local health department, the airline, the German immigration authorities, and the hospital all working together in an act of humanity.

Three months later, with infection numbers dropping in Germany and throughout Europe, the economy began a slow rebound, although things are far from normal. The new immigration law technically took effect, albeit in most parts of Germany it remained suspended until the end of the travel restrictions. When on July 1, 2020, the borders were cautiously opened for skilled professionals (those with either a recognized university degree or vocational certificate), they became eligible to travel to Germany for local employment or intracompany transfer if they were urgently required for economic development, needed to be present in Germany to perform their work, and could not do so remotely. All persons originating from a “risk country” must present extra documentation to enter the Schengen Area and are subject to quarantine regulations. (Currently only European Union/Schengen countries as well as Australia, Canada, Georgia, Montenegro, New Zealand, Thailand, Tunisia, and Uruguay are considered safe countries.) Certain regions renounced lengthy quarantines if regular COVID-19 testing was being done to ensure that assignees could start to work as soon as possible. Employees may be accompanied by their family members, and those who had a valid permit and returned to their country of origin may come back to Germany now.

While many open questions regarding travel options remain, the immigration system is becoming more predictable each day. Germany seems to be developing into an attractive destination country for Indian IT specialists especially, who suffer from the H-1B travel ban in the United States and the lockdown in India. And while the German missions in India resume their operations only slowly, the backlog of waiting applicants grows.

What does the future hold for immigration to Germany?

The country will still need skilled immigration because of its peculiar demographics and strong economy. Nevertheless, the German labor market took a COVID-19 blow and, for the first time in years, shows rising unemployment. It is thus to be expected that the new immigration-friendly law—while not a turncoat—will show some teeth when it comes to issues like comparable salary, labor market tests, and compliance. Already the labor authority has tightened the rules and increased scrutiny when dealing with applications. Thus, the future will again be challenging for immigration lawyers, and immigrants.

Back to Top


5. ITALY

This article summarizes issues related to immigration in Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Processing Times for Work Permits

Italy has a general legal framework to regulate immigration and guidelines on the process. Within the legal framework, each immigration and labor office has wide discretionary powers. Local authorities can decide on their own how to implement rules. This may result in differences in application document requirements and processing times. Also, the turnover of public-office managers and staff may result in changes in application requirements without advance notice. This may happen not only for work permit (nulla osta) applications in immigration and labor offices, but also for residence permit (permesso di soggiorno) applications in the police department (Questura).Sectors affected include agriculture, livestock, fishing, and related activities; caregivers; and domestic work.

Mandatory Quarantine for Arrivals From Bulgaria, Romania

As of July 25, 2020, travelers from Bulgaria and Romania, or those who have stayed/transited there in the last 14 days, must quarantine for 14 days upon arriving in Italy. Italian Health Minister Roberto Speranza signed this order on July 24 in an effort to prevent the importation of COVID-19 from outside Italy. Romania and Bulgaria are therefore added to the list of countries from which travel is possible without having to justify a specific reason but with the quarantine obligation (a 14-day quarantine period in self-isolation).

Entry Ban for 16 Countries

Entry into Italy was banned from the following countries: Armenia, Bahrein, Bangladesh, Brazil, Bosnia Herzegovina, Chile, Kuwait, North Macedonia, Moldova, Oman, Panama, Peru, Dominican Republic, Serbia, Montenegro, and Kosovo. Individuals who have traveled or stayed in one of these countries in the 14 days preceding the intended entry date in Italy are banned from entering the country.

There were exceptions to the ban for citizens of Italy, the European Union, Schengen countries, the United Kingdom, Andorra, Monaco, San Marino, and Vatican City, and their family members, on condition that they were registered as residents in Italy before July 9, 2020.

Other exceptions are for officials and other servants of the EU, international organizations, diplomatic missions and consulates, military personnel in the performance of their duties and—only for Bosnia-Herzegovina, North Macedonia, Serbia, Montenegro, and Kosovo—transport crew members and travel staff members only for transit (maximum of 36 hours) or short stays (up to 120 hours).

Travel from the following countries is allowed with no specific reason required: Algeria, Australia, Canada, Georgia, Japan, Morocco, New Zealand, Rwanda, Republic of Korea, Thailand, Tunisia, and Uruguay.

Travel from other non-EU countries is allowed but only for specific reasons.

Validity of Residence Permits Extended

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Italy extended the validity of residence permits that expired between January 31 and July 31 until August 31, 2020.

However, those who are currently abroad may have problems re-entering Italy without a valid visa/residence permit. Normally, the standard procedure would require one to apply for a “re-entry visa,” which allows a foreigner holding an expired permit (for which a renewal application has not been filed yet or in other circumstances) to fly back to Italy. However, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has confirmed—by means of an internal communication—that it will not be necessary to apply for a re-entry visa.

Foreign citizens with expired permits will be allowed to travel back to Italy, but if they have problems with the re-entry procedures, they may contact the Italian consulate for assistance. For example, the Italian consulate in Canton has issued an alert inviting foreign nationals seeking to re-enter Italy to contact them for the issuance of a document confirming the extension of residence permits that can be used for traveling.

Details:

  • City-by-city immigration processing times chart, https://www.mazzeschi.it/city-by-city-immigration-chart/
  • Overview of the rules currently in place for traveling to Italy, https://www.mazzeschi.it/italy-navigating-covid-19-measures-and-travel-restrictions/
  • COVID-19 Travel Regulations Map, https://www.iatatravelcentre.com/international-travel-document-news/1580226297.htm

Residence permit validity extension, https://www.mazzeschi.it/news/validity-of-residence-permits-permessi-di-soggiorno-extended-until-june-15-2020/

Back to Top


6. RUSSIA

This article provides updates on Russian COVID-19 policies and procedures related to immigration.

Entry to Russia Open for Citizens of the United Kingdom (UK), Turkey, and Tanzania

Entry to Russia is now allowed for citizens of the following countries on the basis of all types of visas:

  • United Kingdom (UK)
  • Tanzania
  • Turkey

Foreign citizens who have permanent residence permits in these countries can enter Russia as well. The Internal Affairs Ministry confirmed that they are issuing all types of invitation letters for citizens of the UK, Tanzania, and Turkey (or foreign nationals who have permanent residence in these countries) starting from August 3, 2020. Russian consulates confirmed that they have started issuing all types of visas on the basis of the invitations approved by the Internal Affairs Ministry.

It was not yet clear as of press time whether the Federal Security Service would allow foreigners from these countries to cross the border without being on the special approved lists issued by the Service.

Entry to the Russian Federation for citizens of the United Kingdom, Turkey, and Tanzania, as well as for foreign citizens who have a residence permit in these countries, is not possible from third countries.

Entry to Russia: 14-Day Quarantine or Testing Requirements

Beginning on July 15, 2020, foreign citizens and those crossing the Russian border on a regular flight, and entering Russia with any purpose except work, must present documentation of a negative COVID-19 test in Russian or English: (1) The document should confirm a negative result for laboratory analysis of COVID-19 infection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The test for infection should be done not earlier than three calendar days before entering Russia. (2) Or, instead of the PCR test, the traveler can submit a document confirming the existence of antibodies of immunoglobulin G (IgG). If the traveler does not have such a document, he or she must pass the test within three calendar days of entering Russia. In case of a positive result, a person will have to self-isolate with no contact (quarantine) until a negative test is received.

Similar requirements apply to Russian citizens.

The entry of foreign citizens is still limited, and only special categories of foreign citizens can enter. Issuance of invitation letters and visas has not yet returned to normal.

Persons (Russian citizens as well as foreigners) returning to Russia on flights organized by the Russian government must quarantine for 14 calendar days from the date of entry.

At the moment, legislation does not require such persons to pass a COVID-19 test or provide evidence of antibodies. However, since there are no precise and clear regulations on this and due to the broad availability of tests, some practitioners recommend taking the test.

Foreign citizens entering Russia with the purpose of work must quarantine for 14 calendar days from the date of entry to Russia regardless of whether they have a negative COVID-19 test or antibodies to the virus. It is recommended that employers arrange for testing of employees anyway.

The above applies not only to workers entering with newly issued work visas (or entering visa-free), but also to those returning with long-term visas issued earlier that are still valid.

Back to Top


7. UNITED KINGDOM

The Home Office has published further details on the new post-Brexit immigration system. Also, there was an update on international travelers arriving in the United Kingdom (UK).

The Home Office recently published further details on the proposed new immigration system. The new system will start on January 1, 2021, immediately after the end of the Brexit transition period.

The consequences of the proposed changes will be huge, but the new statement does not add a great deal to what the Home Office has said before. The new immigration system will apply to both European Union (EU) citizens and non-EU citizens. The visa application process will be simpler for EU citizens because they will not be required to attend a biometric appointment to get a visa, but otherwise the rules will be the same for everyone.

Below are highlights:

  • The main work visa will be the Skilled Worker visa, which is a revised version of the Tier 2 (General) visa.
  • The skills threshold for a Skilled Worker visa will be lower than for a Tier 2 (General) visa. The boundary between the types of jobs that will and won’t qualify for a Skilled Worker visa appears arbitrary. Bricklayers, chefs, PAs, and au pairs will all qualify for a Skilled Worker visa. Scaffolders, cooks, legal secretaries, and care workers will not.
  • The general salary threshold will be £25,600—down from £30,000 for a Tier 2 (General) visa. In most cases the employer will still have to pay the “going rate” for the job, which may be higher than the general salary threshold.
  • The resident labour market test will be abolished.
  • There will be no cap, so no need to apply for restricted certificates of sponsorship.
  • The English language requirement will stay.
  • There will be an intra-company transfer visa. The skills threshold and salary threshold for this visa will be the same as for the current Tier 2 (intra-company transfer) visa. The only people likely to use this type of visa are those who cannot pass an English language test.
  • Government fees will be high. In most cases, the fees for a 5-year skilled worker visa will be around £10,000. For a family of four, the fees will be well over £20,000. There are reductions for small sponsors and jobs on the shortage occupation list.

Employers that will be recruiting staff from the EU next year will need to spend a lot more in visa fees. Those that do not already have a sponsor license should apply for one now.

Also, related to the COVID-19 pandemic, almost everyone now must provide their journey and contact details by filling in an online Public Health Passenger Locator Form before they travel to the UK. Most must quarantine (self-isolate) for 14 days after they arrive.

Details:

  • Kingsley Napley updates, https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/immigration-law-blog
  • Q&A on visa application center reopenings, https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/news/immigration-update-gradual-reopening-of-uk-visa-centres
  • Public Health Passenger Locator Form, https://visas-immigration.service.gov.uk/public-health-passenger-locator-form
  • Self-isolation instructions, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-how-to-self-isolate-when-you-travel-to-the-uk/coronavirus-covid-19-how-to-self-isolate-when-you-travel-to-the-uk
  • New rules for travelers coming to the UK, https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/news/immigration-update-international-travellers-arriving-in-the-uk-from-8-june-2020-have-to-self-isolate-for-14-days

Back to Top


8. New Publications and Items of Interest

Mazzeschi Brexit HelpDesk. The Mazzeschi Brexit HelpDesk provides post-Brexit guidance and assistance for United Kingdom (UK) citizens moving to or living in Italy. Until December 31, 2020, UK citizens will be able to enjoy their EU free movement rights in all EU countries, and therefore can continue to live, work, and study in Italy as they did before January 31, 2020 (Transition Period). Italian law provides that British nationals, like any other EU nationals, who intend to stay in Italy for a period exceeding 3 months should register with the Anagrafe (Register Office) of the municipality where they live. The Brexit HelpDesk is open Monday to Friday from 9 am to 6 pm CEST at phone: +39 0577926921 or email: [email protected]. For more information, see https://www.mazzeschi.it/post-brexit-guide-for-uk-citizen-living-in-italy/.

Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers: ·

The latest immigration news is at https://www.abil.com/news.cfm. ·

The latest published media releases include:

  • ABIL Says Proposed Change to Public Charge Rule Would Exclude Immigrants from Government Programs: https://www.prweb.com/releases/abil_says_proposed_change_to_public_charge_rule_would_exclude_immigrants_from_government_programs/prweb15737932.htm
  • New Data Show Increase in H-1B Denials and RFEs: https://www.prweb.com/releases/new_data_show_increase_in_h_1b_denials_and_rfes/prweb15673632.htm
  • ABIL Urges Administration to Change “Buy American and Hire American” Executive Order: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2018/05/prweb15485457.htm
  • ABIL Member Kuck Baxter Immigration Commercial Nominated for an Emmy: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2018/05/prweb15485460.htm

–   ABIL Members Note Immigration Threats for Employers in 2018: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2018/03/prweb15261255.htm

  • ABIL is available on Twitter: @ABILImmigration.
  • Recent ABIL member blogs are at http://www.abilblog.com/.

Back to Top


9. ABIL Member / Firm News

Dagmar Butte (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-butte.cfm?c=US) was quoted by Forbes in “USCIS Disputes Improperly Denying 900 H-1B Visa Registrations.” She said, “I think USCIS needs to do a better job, given the lessons learned, to provide full transparency between what employers and representatives see and to identify common error triggers and warn of them more effectively. Employers don’t want to game the system and they should at least have the opportunity to fix errors that are baked into the limitations of the system. The Department of Labor has a system that flags these kinds of things to prevent employers from inadvertently doing something that will get the case denied. I think USCIS needs to fix or create warnings for when one of the events they outline is about to happen.” The article is at .

Foster, LLP, has published several new blog postings. “U.S. Immigration Considerations for COVID-19 Pandemic and CARES Act” is at https://www.fosterglobal.com/blog/us-immigration-considerations-for-covid-19-pandemic-and-cares-act/. “Four Tips to Secure an H-1B Approval” is at https://www.fosterglobal.com/blog/four-tips-to-secure-an-h-1b-approval/.

Foster, LLP, hosted a webinar, “Navigating COVID-19: Essential Immigration-Related Updates for Human Resources in a Telecommuting Environment” on April 9, 2020. For more information, see .

Jeff Joseph, of Joseph & Hall, P.C., was quoted by Law360 in “Orgs Say Gov’t Wrongly Denied Market Analysts H-1B Visas.” Commenting on a new nationwide class action lawsuit, MadKudu, Inc. v. USCIS, he said that USCIS’ decision-making, with respect to its pattern and practice of denying H-1B nonimmigrant employment-based petitions for market research analysts positions filed by businesses in the United States, is “nonsense” and disregards “substantial evidence that clearly establishes that market research analysts are a specialty occupation. Under USCIS’ twisted logic, my English literature degree rendered me uniquely unprepared to take on the professional specialty occupation of immigration lawyer.” The article is available by subscription at https://www.law360.com/articles/1264849. The complaint is at https://www.aila.org/infonet/complaint-filed-in-district-court-challenging.

H. Ronald Klasko (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-klasko.cfm) has authored a new blog posting. “Happy Ending to the Unlawful Presence Saga” is at .

Jordan Gonzalez, of Klasko Immigration Law Partners, LLC, has authored a new blog posting. “An Indian National’s Guide to Acquiring a Letter of No-Objection of the Two-Year Home Residence Requirement” is at .

Charles Kuck (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-kuck.cfm) was quoted by the Times of India in “U.S. Eases Ban on Foreigners Returning to Same Job Role.” Mr. Kuck said, “This is an extraordinary change in policy from the original [Presidential] Proclamations’ exceptions and is clearly meant to stop ongoing litigation against the Proclamations’ legality (which the government is going to lose). The provisions are broad enough, if well argued, to essentially incorporate any job in America.” The article is at .

Mr. Kuck was quoted by Bloomberg Law in “New Guidance Details Visa Ban’s National Interest Exceptions (1).” Mr. Kuck said that this proclamation is “basically a complete walk back of the prior exemptions and prohibitions” found in the original order. For example, the State Department’s definition of jobs that pertain to critical infrastructure industries in the new guidance is a major expansion of how it may have traditionally been defined, he said. Mr. Kuck has filed a friend of the court brief in the Gomez case challenging the ban. “The average person thinks a nuclear plant, but now it encompasses IT firms, communications, food and agriculture. I can’t think of a sector that’s not included” under the H-1B applicants’ exemptions, he said. Mr. Kuck predicted that many visa hopefuls stuck outside the United States will likely be able to prove they qualify for a national interest waiver to the ban. “It seems like most people stuck right now, who have been denied an exemption in the past, will easily qualify. It’s a complete walk back because they know they’re going to lose this litigation.” The article is at https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/visa-ban-national-interest-exceptions-detailed-in-new-guidance.

Mr. Kuck was featured on Univision’s Conexion show discussing, “What is the Impact of Trump’s Executive Order Limiting Legal Immigration?” The video is at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-CwHxutj9JI.

Mr. Kuck was quoted by the Times of India in “Class Action Lawsuit Against H-1B Denials for Market Research Analysts Gathers Steam.” Mr. Kuck said, “USCIS does not like being sued. The class action lawsuit actually resulted in USCIS re-opening and approving the plaintiff’s H-1B applications for market research analysts. We would love for more employers and employees to join our suit—there is no cost in doing so.” The article is at .

Mr. Kuck served as one of the plaintiffs’ attorneys in MadKudu, Inc., v. USCIS. A related press release is at https://www.aila.org/advo-media/press-releases/2020/class-action-lawsuit-seeks-to-challenge-uscis. The complaint is at https://www.aila.org/infonet/complaint-filed-in-district-court-challenging.

Mr. Kuck was quoted by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution in “Doctors, Humanitarian Workers Rushing to Help as Virus Spreads.” Mr. Kuck noted the impact on immigrant families of the COVID-19 crisis. “If they are afraid to get tested and it starts running rampant in their communities, it is only going to make it worse for us. It is not going to stay isolated in one place,” he said. See https://www.ajc.com/news/breaking-news/immigrants-refugees-georgia-vulnerable-amid-coronavirus-pandemic/pJJFmzOZzyiUTJRyiEBzoM/

Mr. Kuck was quoted by Breitbart in “Report: India’s H-1B Companies Ask Labor Department to Let Foreign Workers Stay Amid Crash.” Among other things, he said, “Our H-1B system simply does not contemplate this [mass shutdown] scenario that is happening right now.” The article is at https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/04/03/indias-h-1b-companies-ask-labor-department-to-let-foreign-workers-stay-amid-crash/.

Mr. Kuck participated in Georgia Public Broadcasting’s “Political Rewind” to talk about immigrants in detention and how they are being affected by the pandemic, along with other topics. See https://www.gpbnews.org/post/political-rewind-jails-risk-becoming-georgias-next-hotspot.

Mr. Kuck‘s latest Immigration Hour podcast, “COVID-19 and USCIS, ICE, and EOIR – How to NOT Respond to a Crisis,” is at https://soundcloud.com/user-474250731/covid-19-and-uscis-ice-and-eoir-how-to-not-respond-to-a-crisis.

Mr. Kuck published a new blog posting. “Employment, Furlough, and Termination Options for Employers and Their Nonimmigrant Workers (H-1B, L-1, E-2, TN, O-1, and F-1 OPT)” is at .

Robert Loughran (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-loughran.cfm) was interviewed on Austin ABC affiliate KVUE on April 25, 2020, regarding the impact of President Trump’s Proclamation Suspending Entry of Immigrants. The video is at https://www.kvue.com/article/news/politics/austin-immigration-lawyer-presidents-trump-executive-order-immigration/269-096a3083-1b27-42ef-b2a2-dece603e956b.

Mr. Loughran presented a webinar, “Practicing Through Pandemic,” regarding adapting the practice of law in the midst of COVID-19. The webinar was hosted by the American Immigration Lawyers Association’s Texas Chapter and the San Antonio Bar Association’s Texas Chapter on April 3, 2020. For more information, see https://zoom.us/meeting/register/u5wvdOugrTssIi2JLhrdc_IXuKEV_xXZ6Q.

Cyrus Mehta (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-mehta.cfm) has authored or co-authored several new blog postings. “The Beneficial Impact of the Supreme Court’s Decision in Kisor v. Wilkie on H-1B Denials” is at http://blog.cyrusmehta.com/2020/05/the-beneficial-impact-of-the-supreme-courts-decision-in-kisor-v-wilkie-on-h-1b-denials.html. “The Differing Impact of Foreign Entity Changes on an L-1 Extension and EB-1C Petition” is at http://blog.cyrusmehta.com/2020/05/the-differing-impact-of-foreign-entity-changes-on-an-l-1-extension-and-eb-1c-petition.html. “FAQ Relating to Skilled Workers in the Green Card Backlogs During COVID-19” is at . “Changes in Salary and Other Working Conditions for Nonimmigrant Workers in L-1, O, TN, E and F-1 Status Due to COVID-19” is at https://bit.ly/35LofcC. “Building the Legal Case to Challenge Trump’s Immigration Ban” is at http://blog.cyrusmehta.com/2020/04/building-the-legal-case-to-challenge-trumps-immigration-ban.html.

Cyrus Mehta (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-mehta.cfm) was quoted in several media outlets regarding exceptions to the Trump administration’s work visa ban:

  • “New State Dept. H-1B Visa Guidance Won’t Stop Immigration Lawsuits,” Forbes, https://bit.ly/3iJPERz. Mr. Mehta said, “The State Department issued these broad exceptions to the proclamation to stave off the lawsuits, but they must continue with equal vigor as the exceptions are tantamount to a rewrite of the INA [Immigration and Nationality Act] in violation of the APA [Administrative Procedure Act].”
  • “The Trump Administration Has Made Exceptions to Work Visa Bans—But Conditions Apply,” Yahoo, https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-administration-made-exceptions-visa-105750618.html (same quote as above).
  • “U.S. Eases Ban on Foreigners Returning to Same Job Role,” Times of India, . Mr. Mehta said, “The beneficiary of an approved H-1B or L-1 petition must now meet a new super standard under the national interest exception, which [is] not part of the [INA], and be subject to the whim and caprice of the consular official, who would have the final say in approving or denying the request. There will also be no right to appeal if the national interest exception is denied.” He added that the ban “is unlawful and the subject of several meritorious lawsuits. The Trump administration carved out these exceptions to stave off the lawsuits, but they must continue with equal vigor and the administration should not be allowed to get away with the ban.”
  • “Access Denied: COVID-19 the Perfect Opportunity for Trump to Push His Anti-Immigration Agenda,” The Week, https://www.theweek.in/theweek/more/2020/08/13/access-denied.html. Among other things, Mr. Mehta commented that federal courts “have reversed arbitrary H-1B denials. One court also held that the policy of requiring extensive documentation with third-party clients was unlawful. This should improve the prospects of H-1B requests filed on behalf of IT professionals from India who are assigned to their party client sites.”

Mr. Mehta spoke on “Ethics and Immigration: Spotlight on Select Rules and Client Representation During COVID-19” on May 18, 2020. He presented a briefing on fundamental ethical rules, how they pertain to immigration practice, and considerations when ethical issues arise in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Mr. Mehta addressed the four C’s of professional conduct rules: competence, communications, confidentiality, and conflicts, as well as other key rules requiring attention by lawyers during the pandemic. For more information or to order, see https://www.pli.edu/programs/ethics-and-immigration-spotlight-on-select-rules-and-client-representation-during-covid-19.

Mr. Mehta published an article on LinkedIn shortly after President Trump issued a proclamation banning permanent immigration to the United States for 60 days with possible extensions, with some exceptions. The article, “Trump Cannot Be Allowed to Rewrite Immigration Laws Based on Whim and Caprice,” is at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/trump-cannot-allowed-rewrite-immigration-laws-based-whim-cyrus-mehta/.

Mr. Mehta was quoted in the following publications on President Trump’s order:

  • Law360, “Can Trump End Immigration? Wording Matters, Scholars Say,” https://www.law360.com/articles/1265963/can-trump-end-immigration-wording-matters-scholars-say
  • Economic Times, “Trump’s Plan to Suspend Immigration Would Affect Indians Waiting to Migrate to U.S.,” https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/nri/nris-in-news/trumps-plan-to-suspend-immigration-would-affect-indians-waiting-to-migrate-to-us/articleshow/75272497.cms
  • Times of India, “If U.S. Immigration is Temporarily Suspended, Legal Experts Foresee a Plethora of Lawsuit[s],” https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/if-us-immigration-is-temporarily-suspended-legal-experts-foresee-a-plethora-of-lawsuit/articleshow/75266086.cms
  • India Times, “Trump Stops Green Cards for 60 Days Overseas. H-1B Visa Could Be Next,” https://www.newsindiatimes.com/trump-stops-green-cards-for-60-days-overseas-h-1b-visa-could-be-next/
  • Business Insider, “Trump’s Executive Order Suspending Entry of Immigrants is ‘Drastic and Damaging,’ Says U.S. Immigration Attorney,” https://www.businessinsider.in/international/news/trumps-executive-order-suspending-entry-of-immigrants-is-drastic-and-damaging-says-us-immigration-attorney/articleshow/75310925.cms
  • South Asian Times, “Trump’s Immigration Ban Not Affecting H-1B Visa,” https://thesouthasiantimes.info/vol-12-issue-51/ (see the next page of the e newspaper)

Mr. Mehta‘s posting was quoted by Breitbart in “Report: India’s H-1B Companies Ask Labor Department to Let Foreign Workers Stay Amid Crash.” He said, “If an employee works from a home which is within commuting distance of the workplace, then there is no need to file an amendment.” But, he added, “if an employee works from a home which is NOT within commuting distance from the workplace, the employer should obtain a new LCA for that location and file an H-1B amendment.” The article is at https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/04/03/indias-h-1b-companies-ask-labor-department-to-let-foreign-workers-stay-amid-crash/.

Mr. Mehta was quoted by India-West in “In Fresh Blow to Business Immigration, Trump Bans Federal Agencies from Hiring H-1B Workers.” Mr. Mehta said the Trump order was largely ceremonial: “This executive order does not say or do much damage to the H-1B visa program, which already has built-in protections in the law and regulations.” The article is at https://bit.ly/2XFkF0W.

David Isaacson, of Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners, PLLC, has authored a new blog posting. “Implementation of Safe Third Country Agreement Held to Violate Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms—So Why Will Prior U.S. Asylum Claimants Be Denied a Hearing at the Refugee Protection Division in Canada Even After This Takes Effect?” is at https://bit.ly/2Dp3YA9.

Mr. Mehta and Stephen Yale-Loehr (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-loehr.cfm?c=US) were quoted by the Times of India in “Medical Insurance a Burden for Laid-Off H-1B Workers.” Among other things, Mr. Mehta said, “Employer plans are generally of a higher quality, and employers are able to purchase these higher quality plans at a discounted group rate from the insurance company. In most cases, the employer pays most of the premium and the employee pays a smaller percentage. When the employee is terminated, the employee pays the whole cost of the insurance [under COBRA] and the employer generally does not pay.” Mr. Yale-Loehr said that many laid-off H-1B workers do not know about COBRA benefits or may be afraid to ask. “They should consult an experienced insurance agent to understand their rights. And many employers may not realize they need to provide COBRA continuation coverage to a terminated H-1B worker,” he noted. The article is at https://bit.ly/2XhFQFe.

David Isaacson, of Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners PLLC, has authored a new blog posting. “My Comment on the Proposed Affidavit of Support Revisions: Do You Have One Too?” is at http://blog.cyrusmehta.com/2020/04/my-comment-on-proposed-affidavit-of-support-revisions-do-you-have-one-too.html.

Cora-Ann Pestaina, of Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners PLLC, has authored a new blog posting. “LCA Posting Requirements at Home During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Do I Post on the Refrigerator or Bathroom Mirror?” is at https://bit.ly/34yaHkb.

Angelo Paparelli (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-paparelli.cfm) and partner Leon Rodriguez filed friend-of-the-court briefs on behalf o the Society for Human Resources Management (SHRM), the Alliance for International Exchange, and more than 100 co-amici consisting of sponsors, employers, and hosts participating in the J-1 exchange visitor visa program. The cases are Gomez v. Trump and National Association of Manufacturers, et al. v. Wolf. The SHRM press statement, which includes links to both filings, is at https://shrm.org/about-shrm/press-room/press-releases/Pages/SHRM-Leads-Amicus-Brief-in-Support-of-J-1-Visa-Visitor-Exchange-Programs.aspx.

Mr. Paparelli co-authored a new legal update. “Another Day, Another Immigration Executive Order: Now Federal Contractors are Targeted” is at https://www.seyfarth.com/news-insights/another-day-another-immigration-executive-order-now-federal-contractors-are-targeted.html.

Mr. Paparelli authored a new blog posting. “No Whine Before Its Time: USCIS Recognizes Immigration Successorship in Interest for Multinational Executives and Managers” is at https://bit.ly/3bHkkPw. Mr. Paparelli authored an op-ed published by Bloomberg Law on how immigrants can help us attack COVID-19 and revive the economy. “Insight: Legal Immigration Can Help Revive the Economy—If We Let It” is at https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/insight-legal-immigration-can-help-revive-the-economy-if-we-let-it. Mr. Paparelli was quoted by Law360 in “Shielded From Green Card Ban, EB-5 Investors Still At Risk.” The article discusses the risks to those who invested in projects that are under construction and are halted due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Those with pending EB-5 petitions must alert USCIS of any significant changes to the project during the estimated two-year processing time. An investor may be required to file a new petition if the changes are significant enough, causing the applicant to lose their spot in line for a green card, sometimes for years. “This throws the EB-5 program into absolute turmoil and ambiguity,” Mr. Paparelli said. The article is at https://www.law360.com/construction/articles/1269542/shielded-from-green-card-ban-eb-5-investors-still-at-risk. Mr. Paparelli, partner at Seyfarth Shaw LLP, and William Stock (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-stock.cfm?c=US), partner at Klasko Immigration Law Partners LLP, were quoted by Law360 in “Axed H-1B Work Visa Policies May Not Be Gone For Good.” Mr. Paparelli noted that USCIS will not stop trying to issue rule changes through policy memoranda unless it is forced to do so. “So what are the levers of pressure that can be placed on them? Congress, money or politics,” he said. Mr. Stock said that many of the immigration guidance memos the Trump administration has issued have gone too far and tried to change regulations without rulemaking. “This administration certainly has seemed to care less than other administrations have about whether the guidance they are promulgating would be inconsistent with the regulations,” he said. The article is available by registering at https://www.law360.com/articles/1276864/axed-h-1b-work-visa-policies-may-not-be-gone-for-good. Pearl Immigration has posted a summary of information on U.S. consulate closures around the world and related information due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The summary is at https://www.immigrationlaw.com/u-s-consulate-closures-due-to-covid-19/.

Siskind Susser PC has posted a new Siskind Summary. “S. 386—The Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act of 2020 (as of 8/5/2020)” is at https://www.visalaw.com/siskind-summary-s-386-fairness-high-skilled-immigrants-act-2020-852020/.

Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP has published several new blog postings. “Court Extends Temporary Restraining Order in Case Challenging EAD Delays”; “Who Can File a Form I-485 Adjustment of Status in the U.S. Under EB-5?”; “DOL, DHS Enter Memorandum of Agreement to Share Info on Foreign Workers for Enforcement Purposes”; and “U.S. State Department Explains Exceptions to H-1B, H-2B, J-1, L-1A, and L-1B Labor Market Ban”; and “SEVP Modifies Temporary Exemptions for Nonimmigrant Students Taking Online Courses During Fall 2020 Semester” are available at https://wolfsdorf.com/blog/.

Mr. Yale-Loehr co-authored a new report, “Recruiting for the Future: A Realistic Road to a Points-Tested Visa Program in the U.S.” Links to the report and a related slide deck are available at https://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/MigrationandHumanRightsProgram/Recruiting-for-the-Future.cfm. The report (https://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/information-technology/upload/Immigration-Points.pdf), was discussed in several news outlets:·         “Skilled Immigration is Just What We Need to Recover Our Economy, ” op-ed by Mr. Yale-Loehr and Mackenzie Eason, The Hill, https://thehill.com/opinion/immigration/509365-skilled-immigration-is-just-what-we-need-to-recover-our-economy ·         “Law Scholars’ Proposal Boosts Skilled Immigration, Economy, ” Cornell Chronicle, https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2020/07/law-scholars-proposal-boosts-skilled-immigration-economy·         “A Blueprint for Reforming Skilled Immigration in the U.S., ” Charles Koch Foundation, https://www.charleskochfoundation.org/story/blueprint-reforming-skilled-immigration-in-the-u-s/

·         “¿Está preparado EEUU para una reforma migratoria por méritos? Estudio recomienda hacer primero una prueba,” Univision, https://www.univision.com/noticias/inmigracion/esta-preparado-eeuu-para-una-reforma-migratoria-por-meritos-estudio-recomienda-hacer-primero-una-prueba

·         “Qué tipo de inmigrantes podrían aprobar los requisitos de la reforma ‘por méritos’ de Trump,” El Diario, https://eldiariony.com/2020/08/02/que-tipo-de-inmigrantes-podrian-aprobar-los-requisitos-de-la-reforma-por-meritos-de-trump/

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Univision in “¿Se pueden limpiar los antecedentes migratorios? Respondemos tus preguntas de inmigración” (English translation: “Can Immigration Records Be Cleared? We Answer Your Immigration Questions.” Although the federal government has the right to deport people with legitimate final or absent deportation orders, some “may be subject to challenge. Immigrants have rights,” he said. For example, he explained, “Given inefficiencies in the immigration court system, many people may have received a deportation order illegally because ICE did not have their correct address to notify them of their date in immigration court.” In such cases, he noted, “affected individuals may have the right to reopen their immigration case.” If this is your case, Mr. Yale-Loehr recommended, “find a lawyer now.” The article is at https://bit.ly/31Af7Ga. Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by the Times of India in “Nasscom Says Trump Move on Federal Contracts Misguided.” He said the latest executive order seems innocuous, but that “as we have seen with prior executive orders, this may be the starting point to increase H-1B enforcement generally. Moreover, even if the review doesn’t do much, it is good publicity for Trump to appear to support American workers as part of his re-election campaign.” The article is at . Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Inside Higher Ed in “Trump Administration Reportedly Considers Restrictions on Foreign Student Work Program.” Mr. Yale-Loehr noted that the Trump administration could take a number of actions in relation to Optional Practical Training (OPT). He said that he thinks President Trump is likely to instruct the Department of Homeland Security “to start rulemaking, because I think he’s getting a lot of pushback from companies that rely on OPT. A proposed rule would give him political cover while not actually suspending the OPT program.” The article is at https://bit.ly/2MaCYVE. Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Univision in “Corte de apelaciones falla en contra de una medida de Trump que prohíbe la entrada de migrantes sin seguro médico.” The article discusses an appeals court ruling against a Trump administration measure prohibiting the entry of uninsured migrants. If effective, “the new temporarily suspended rule would affect more than half of all immigrants. The 2-1 decision … confirmed the temporary suspension decision issued in November,” he said. He further noted that the majority opinion of the 9th Circuit panel of judges maintains that “the lower court adequately determined that the plaintiffs would suffer irreparable harm in the form of a long separation from their loved ones abroad. The majority also noted that the President does not have unlimited power to deny immigrant visas based on purely domestic concerns.” The article (in Spanish) is at https://bit.ly/3blFD94. Mr. Yale-Loehr co-authored “Challenging H-1B Denials in Federal Courts: Trends and Strategies” (Apr. 27, 2020), which includes details on Miller Mayer research into recent H-1B cases, summaries of recent cases, and strategies and takeaways for employers to use in future lawsuits, https://millermayer.com/2020/challenging-h-1b-denials-in-federal-courts-trends-and-strategies/Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Univision in “Demanda contra el gobierno por negar ayuda a matrimonios mixtos revive el temor al uso de datos privados.” The article (in Spanish) discusses a lawsuit challenging the exclusion of certain immigrants from receiving coronavirus stimulus checks. Mr. Yale-Loehr noted that the legal precedent in this case could be in favor of the government. “I wish MALDEF the best, but I fear that they may lose their case,” he said. “In Mathews v. Díaz, 426 US 67 (1976), the Supreme Court held that “Congress regularly establishes rules regarding foreigners that may be unacceptable if applied to citizens” (426 US at 80) and that “there is no constitutional duty to provide all foreign citizens with the same benefits provided to citizens,” he added. “The Court held that such disparate treatment by Congress regularly does not necessarily imply harmful discrimination,” he said. The article is at https://www.univision.com/noticias/inmigracion/demanda-contra-el-gobierno-por-negar-ayuda-a-matrimonios-mixtos-revive-el-temor-al-uso-de-datos-privados.  Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by the Toronto Globe and Mail in “Trump Freezes Some Immigration to U.S., May Stop Temporary Work Permits, Citing Coronavirus.” Mr. Yale-Loehr said, “First, if the purpose of the proclamation is to protect against the coronavirus, it makes no sense to temporarily suspend entry of people applying for green visas but not those coming temporarily to the United States. Second, if the purpose is to protect U.S. workers, it also makes no sense to exclude temporary foreign workers from the proclamation.” The article is at https://www.theglobeandmail.com/world/us-politics/article-trump-freezes-some-immigration-to-us-may-stop-temporary-work/. Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Huffington Post in “Trump Signs Order Suspending Some Immigration During Coronavirus Pandemic.” He said before the order was released that an order to ban all immigration to the United States would be “outrageous and likely unconstitutional,” noting that the United States has “never done that before, even during world wars.” The article is at https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-executive-order-immigration-coronavirus_n_5e9f3bf1c5b6a486d08048b5?guccounter=1. Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by China Daily in “U.S. Immigration Suspension Draws Criticism.” He said, “If the executive order (had) suspended all immigration to the United States, it would surely be challenged as unconstitutional.” The article is at http://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202004/23/WS5ea0cea1a3105d50a3d18214.html. Mr. Yale-Loehr was interviewed on The Take, a podcast from Al Jazeera, about the history of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program and how the Supreme Court might rule in a few weeks. The podcast, “When ‘Dreamers’ Self-Deport,” is at https://www.aljazeera.com/podcasts/thetake/2020/05/dreamers-deport-200522152026157.html. Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Law360 in “Can Trump End Immigration? Wording Matters, Scholars Say.” He noted that if the order targeted anyone already in the United States, it would also raised constitutional concerns. The article is at https://www.law360.com/immigration/articles/1265963. Mr. Yale-Loehr was also quoted by several other publications on the same topic:·         Financial Times, “Donald Trump Suspends Key Routes to U.S. Immigration for 60 Days,” https://www.ft.com/content/7060ba17-03b5-48d6-94d1-37c6d99c5f0a (available by subscription only)·         Express (UK), “Trump ‘Pauses Immigration’ to Put Americans First in Line for Jobs After COVID-19 Lockdown,” https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1272096/donald-trump-immigration-ban-US-coronavirus-job-market-employment-death-toll-latest ·         AZ Central, “Trump Wants to Shut Down Immigration to Slow the Coronavirus and Protect American Jobs. Here’s How That Could Backfire,” https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/immigration/2020/04/21/trumps-immigration-shutdown-plan-could-backfire-coronavirus-covid-19/3000121001/·         Vox, “Trump’s Executive Order to Stop Issuing Green Cards Temporarily, Explained,” https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/4/21/21229286/trump-immigration-ban-executive-order-coronavirus ·         Univision, “Esto es lo que se sabe hasta ahora de la orden de Trump de suspender la inmigración a EEUU,” https://www.univision.com/noticias/inmigracion/esto-es-lo-que-se-sabe-hasta-ahora-de-la-orden-de-trump-de-suspender-la-inmigracion-a-eeuu Mr. Yale-Loehr of Miller Mayer LLP; Cornell Law School, together with additional Cornell departments; and Catholic Charities of Tompkins/Tioga Counties, presented a webinar on new changes to immigrants’ access to public benefits and the impact of COVID-19 care on the public charge analysis. The webinar, “Immigrants, Public Benefits, and COVID-19,” was held April 13, 2020. For more information or to download the slide deck and handouts, see https://cornell.app.box.com/folder/109666262652.

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2020-08-01 11:53:222023-10-16 14:30:29ABIL Global Update • August 2020

ABIL Global Update • June 2020

June 01, 2020/in Global Immigration Update /by ABIL

In this issue:

1. DOCUMENT PROCUREMENT AND THE LEGALIZATION PROCESS: AN OVERVIEW – This article provides an overview of policies and procedures on document procurement and legalization in several countries

2. CANADA – Canada has issued several updates in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

3. ITALY – Italy has lifted some travel restrictions. A new law extends residence permit validity and suspension of administrative procedures. Also, Italy has published a “Phase 2” decree related to COVID-19 rules. The government is drafting a decree to boost investments. Foreigners with serious health conditions can apply for a medical treatment temporary permit. Applications are open for migrant worker regularization.

4. RUSSIA – Russia has announced extensions of patents for certain foreign citizens, a new e-visa, and COVID-19 procedures updates.

5. SCHENGEN AREA – Schengen Member States and Schengen Associated States have been invited to extend restrictions on nonessential travel to the European Union until June 15, 2020.

6. UNITED KINGDOM – The Home Office has clarified what those stuck outside the United Kingdom (UK) with expired 30-day entry visas must do to be able to enter the UK. Also, the Home Secretary has announced a 14-day quarantine regime for international passengers arriving in the UK.

7. New Publications and Items of Interest – New Publications and Items of Interest

8. ABIL Member / Firm News – ABIL Member / Firm News

Downloads:

ABIL Global Immigration Update – June 2020


1. DOCUMENT PROCUREMENT AND THE LEGALIZATION PROCESS: AN OVERVIEW

This article provides an overview of policies and procedures on document procurement and legalization in several countries.

Canada

Police clearance certificates are issued in Canada by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), the federal police service, and are commonly referred to as “RCMP criminal record checks.” Applications for RCMP checks for immigration purposes require fingerprints to be taken by a local police station in Canada, or by an accredited fingerprinting company inside or outside Canada. A list of accredited companies can be requested at [email protected]. The fingerprints are then submitted to the RCMP’s Canadian Criminal Real Time Identification Services (CCRTIS) for searches of the National Repository of Criminal Records, and the RCMP issues a one-page criminal record check displaying the fingerprints, the person’s picture, the content of the repository, and the official RCMP dry seal.

The RCMP criminal record check may be submitted to Canada’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, referred to as “Global Affairs Canada,” for authentication. Authentication is the certification of the genuineness of the RCMP’s seal so that the issued document may be recognized in another jurisdiction. Documents brought in person to Global Affairs Canada’s Authentication Office in Ottawa are processed on the spot, but may also be mailed in, or mailed to one of the Canadian consulates or embassies abroad that offer authentication services. In Canada this service is free of charge, but Canadian representations abroad may charge a fee. Because the government of Canada is not party to the Hague Apostille Convention, authentication by Global Affairs Canada is usually required before a foreign or Canadian document can be legalized by a foreign consulate or embassy.

A detailed process outline tailored to the type of document that requires authentication is on Global Affairs Canada’s website at . As of this writing, the website includes a notice stating, “Due to the evolving situation regarding COVID-19, authentication services will be closed to the public until further notice. Our mail-in service will continue. Usual mail-in service standards may not apply.”

Italy

Italian police clearance certificates are also known as criminal records or police records, and are official certificates from the Judicial Records Register of the Italian Court.

In Italy there are two kinds of police records:

  1. The Certificato Generale del Casellario Giudiziale (General Certificate of Good Conduct), which certifies all irrevocable judgments of the court regarding criminal, civil, and administrative matters.
  2. The Certificato dei Carichi Pendenti (Certificate of Pending Charges), which shows a person’s pending criminal proceedings.

How can a police record be obtained? There are two ways:

  1. The individual concerned or a delegate can request it by visiting the Italian court in person. In such a case, the certificate will be released by simply providing the officer with the following:
  • In case of a delegate, proxy duly signed by the applicant
  • Applicant’s ID document – scan copy
  • Revenue stamps for the certificate request (1 revenue stamp of €16 + 1 revenue stamp of €3.87)
  1. The individual concerned or a delegate can request it online by following these steps:
  • Fill out and submit the online application form.
  • After 3 to 5 working days, visit the Italian court in person for the certificate collection and bring the supporting documents:
  • In case of a delegate, proxy duly signed by the applicant
  • Applicant’s ID document – scan copy
  • Revenue stamps for the certificate request (1 revenue stamp of €16 + 1 revenue stamp of €3.87)

Also, Italian police records usually must be duly legalized to be officially recognized abroad. The legalization process is done by affixing a stamp or a sticker on the document itself or on a separate certifying paper.

If the country that issued the document has signed the Hague Convention of 5th October 1961, then the legalization is by means of a procedure called apostille, to be completed at the local prefecture having jurisdiction over the town hall that issued the police record; otherwise, the document must be legalized by the embassy/consulate of the country of issuance located in Italy.

The exact requirements to obtain the legalization/apostille must be determined on a case-by-case basis with the issuing authority.

For more information, see https://www.italycertificates.com/italian-criminal-record/

Turkey

In Turkey, police clearances (criminal background checks/records, Adli Sicil Kaydi) are issued by the Public Prosecutor’s Office within the Ministry of Justice. This may be requested by the individual in person at the Prosecutor’s Office and is produced on demand immediately and affixed with a red seal for veracity.

A police clearance is also available via an individual’s electronic government account, called an E-devlet account. The individual logs into the account with a personal passcode and can print this and other personal government documents such as birth certificates and address registration documents. Veracity of the online document is confirmed by a unique bar code at the bottom of the document. This bar code can then be confirmed online for legitimacy. The document can be generated in English as well.

As Turkey is a signatory of the Apostille Convention, it will issue an apostille for this police clearance as long as it is destined for another apostille country. In January 2019, Turkey initiated an online apostille process for a few specific personal civil documents. Currently the process is applicable only to Turkish citizens and only for police clearances and court orders. The plan is to expand this to other documents, such as birth, death, and marriage records; diplomas; transcripts; and corporate establishment documents.

Back to Top


2. CANADA

Canada has issued several updates in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Canada has extended the travel ban between the United States and Canada to June 21, 2020. Most travel from overseas remains suspended until June 30, 2020. Issuance of electronic travel authorizations and visitor visas are currently suspended and require additional argumentation to prove the purpose of travel.

Unitl August 31, 2020, international students already in Canada are allowed to work full-time, provided they work in an essential service or function as defined by Public Safety Canada, in the following sectors: Energy and Utilities, Information and Communication Technologies, Finance, Health, Food, Water, Transportation, Safety, Government, and Manufacturing. Note that this is not a blanket permission per industry, but the job in question must be covered by the specific essential functions identified by Public Safety Canada in every industry covered under this initiative.

In addition, to facilitate and expedite new hires (or renewals) for certain occupations now considered a priority due to COVID-19, Service Canada has announced a list of priority occupations that will be expedited and, exceptionally, not be subject to the advertising requirement. This streamlines the Labour Market Impact Assessment process for the following occupations and their NOCs:

 

6331 – Butchers, meat cutters, and fishmongers (retail and wholesale)

7511 – Transport truck drivers

8252 – Agricultural service contractors, farm supervisors, and specialized livestock workers

8431 – General farm workers

8432 – Nursery and greenhouse workers

8611 – Harvesting labourers

9463 – Fish and seafood plant workers

9617 – Labourers in food, beverage, and associated products processing

9618 – Labourers in fish and seafood processing

9462 – Industrial butchers and meat cutters, poultry preparers, and related workers

 

An additional work permit application at the consular post is required, as this is the prerequisite to be allowed to travel to Canada. This may be complicated by the fact that biometrics are still required for work permits to be approved, yet most biometric collection points worldwide are closed. However, a number of accredited Panel Physicians are still performing Canadian immigration medical examinations.

Back to Top


3. ITALY

Italy has lifted some travel restrictions. A new law extends residence permit validity and suspension of administrative procedures. Also, Italy has published a “Phase 2” decree related to COVID-19 rules. The government is drafting a decree to boost investments. Foreigners with serious health conditions can apply for a medical treatment temporary permit.

Travel restrictions lifted. As of June 3, 2020, the Italian government announced that it is possible to move freely throughout the country without the need for a justified reason, and travel restrictions have been lifted for travelers coming from the European Union (EU) and United Kingdom (UK) (including all EU Member States, Schengen Area Countries, UK, and Andorra, Monaco, San Marino, and Vatican State), who will no longer be required to quarantine upon arrival. Exceptions apply for those who have been outside the countries listed above within 14 days of traveling to Italy.

Visitors from outside the EU are expected to be allowed again in the country after June 15, 2020.

New law. A new law, effective April 30, 2020, extended the validity of residence permits to August 31, 2020. The law also extended the validity of nulla Osta (entry clearances for family reasons, work permits) for the same period and the terms for conversion of study permits into work permits.

The validity of Italian identification documents (e.g., identity cards, passports) expiring on or after March 17, 2020, also was extended until August 31, 2020.

In addition, all applications pending as of February 23, 2020, or filed after that date were suspended during the period between February 23, 2020, and April 15, 2020. This meant that any applications filed during that period were not processed in the same timeframe. This period was extended to May 15, 2020.

COVID-19 Phase 2. Also, the Italian government published a “Phase 2” decree in late April with a set of rules that applied in the first several weeks of May 2020. The new provisions were not significantly different from the ones previously in force: the government extended the “lockdown,” although the rules were somewhat relaxed and the list of businesses authorized to reopen was significantly extended (the list can be found in attachment 3 of the decree; businesses are identified by the specific industry code called Codice Ateco).

Reduction of thresholds for investor visa. On May 19, 2020, the Italian government published the Decreto rilancio, a decree intended to boost investments and to mitigate the negative effects of the pandemic on the Italian economy. The government aims to attract more investments, especially in companies and innovative start-ups. The decree reduces the amount required to qualify for an investor visa to 500,000 EUR (for investment in an Italian company, instead of 1 million EUR) and to 250,000 EUR (for investment in an innovative startup, instead of 500,000 EUR). The decree will need to be converted into law by the Italian Parliament within 60 days following publication. During the conversion process, it can be subject to further amendments.

Medical treatment temporary permit. Foreigners who have a serious medical condition and for whom returning to the country of origin or provenance would constitute a serious health risk cannot be expelled from Italy, according to a decree. Those in such circumstances can apply for a residence permit for medical treatment (permesso di soggiorno per cure mediche). The application must be filed at the police office and requires submission of a medical certificate issued by a public hospital or private hospital accredited by the national health system. The permit is issued for a maximum of one year and is renewable if the health condition persists.

Applications open for migrant worker regularization. From June 1 until July 15, 2020, applications to regularize an employment relationship with a foreign (or Italian) worker or apply for a 6-month residence permit are being accepted. This is possible only for specific sectors of work activities and under certain conditions.

There are two possible options: (1) the employer (company or individual) can apply for a work permit (or declare an irregular work relationship with a foreigner or Italian national) for a foreign national in Italy; or (2) the foreign national with a permit expired since October 31, 2019, can apply for a 6-month residence permit.

Sectors include agriculture, livestock, fishing, and related activities; caregivers; and domestic work.

Details:

  • Travel restrictions lifted, https://www.mazzeschi.it/news/italy-reopen-its-gates/
  • Law decree April 8, 2020, n. 23, https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2020/04/08/20G00043/sg
  • Phase 2 decree, https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2020/04/27/20A02352/sg
  • Residence Permit Validity Extended to August 31st, 2020, https://www.mazzeschi.it/news/validity-of-residence-permits-permessi-di-soggiorno-extended-until-june-15-2020/
  • COVID-19: Italy Moves to Phase 2, https://www.mazzeschi.it/news/italy-new-decree-introduces-covid-19-related-measure/
  • Proposal to Reduce Thresholds for the Investor Visa, https://www.mazzeschi.it/news/italy-proposal-to-reduce-thresholds-for-the-investor-visa/
  • Stuck in Italy Due to Health Problems? Apply for a Medical Treatment Temporary Permit, https://www.mazzeschi.it/news/stuck-in-italy-due-to-health-problems-apply-for-a-medical-treatment-temporary-permit/
  • Italian government information regarding June 1-July 15 applications, https://www.interno.gov.it/it/notizie/emersione-dei-rapporti-lavoro-e-rilascio-permessi-soggiorno-temporaneo
  • “Applications Open for Migrant Workers Regularization,” Mazzeschi S.r.l., https://www.mazzeschi.it/news/applications-open-for-migrant-workers-regularization/

Back to Top


4. RUSSIA

Russia has announced extensions of patents for certain foreign citizens, a new e-visa, and COVID-19 procedures updates.

Patents can be extended multiple times. A federal law effective April 24, 2020, changes the procedure of reissuance of patents for work in Russia by foreign citizens who entered using a non-visa regime. Now it is possible to apply for a patent extension an unlimited number of times (previously patents were extended only once). Documents supporting the extension must be filed not less than 10 business days before the expiration of the patent.

New e-visa. Federal Law bill under review: A new bill introduced to the State Duma on April 20, 2020, proposes amendments to the federal law of August 15, 1996, № 114-FL, “On entering and exiting Russian Federation.” The bill introduces, beginning January 1, 2021, a new visa category: the “unified e-visa” (UEV). The new visa will be single-entry, issued for a term of 60 calendar days with an allowed stay of 16 calendar days, and processed within 4 calendar days from the date the application is filed.

This visa category will replace the e-visa that exists now (standard one-entry business visa, tourist, humanitarian), on the basis of which foreign citizens from certain countries are able to visit a number of specified Russia regions with short-term trips.

Foreign citizens who will receive UEV will be able to visit all Russian regions with the following purposes:

  • Guest visit;
  • Business visit;
  • Tourist;
  • Participant in scientific, cultural and political, economical and sporting events;
  • other reasons.

The UEV will be issued only to the citizens of designated countries, soon to be determined by the government. Entry with this type of visa will be possible only through certain border control points (also soon to be determined by the government).

To receive the UEV, a foreign citizen will not need an inviting party (organization/company or Russian citizen).

The UEV will be issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on a foreign citizen’s application, which must be submitted in electronic form through a special Internet portal.

E-visas in the old format will be issued until December 31, 2020, with validity until February 3, 2021.

COVID-19 procedures update. Russia also announced that visas will be extended for 90 days when departure from Russia is not possible due to a quarantine in the home country or country of permanent residence. In such cases, the visa can be extended for a period up to 90 days, with the possibility of extension.

On April 29, 2020, the Russian government issued an order temporarily closing the Russian borders for an indefinite period of time for entry of foreign nationals and stateless persons to the territory of the Russian Federation, with some exceptions, such as diplomatic and military personnel and others.

Back to Top


5. SCHENGEN AREA

Schengen Member States and Schengen Associated States have been invited to extend restrictions on nonessential travel to the European Union until June 15, 2020.

On May 8, 2020, the European Commission invited Schengen Member States and Schengen Associated States to extend temporary restrictions on nonessential travel to the European Union (EU) until June 15, 2020. The temporary travel restrictions apply to all nonessential travel from third countries to the EU+ area. Based on epidemiological considerations, the Commission will assess if a further prolongation of travel restrictions beyond June 15 will be needed.

Details:

  • EU notice,
  • Coronavirus: Member States to Extend Restriction on Nonessential Travel to the EU Until 15 June,

Back to Top


6. UNITED KINGDOM

The Home Office has clarified what those stuck outside the United Kingdom (UK) with expired 30-day entry visas must do to be able to enter the UK. Also, the Home Secretary has announced a 14-day quarantine regime for international passengers arriving in the UK.

New Home Office guidance confirms that those with expired 30-day entry visas must apply for a replacement visa before traveling. Before the end of 2020, the person must email the Coronavirus Immigration Help Centre to obtain a replacement visa free of charge once the visa application centers reopen.

Also, Home Secretary Priti Patel announced on May 22, 2020, that a 14-day quarantine regime for international passengers arriving in the UK would begin on June 8, 2020.

Details:

  • UK Immigration FAQs for UK Visa Holders and Businesses, https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/services/department/immigration/coronavirus-covid-19-uk-immigration-faqs
  • Home Secretary Announces 14-Day Quarantine for International Passengers Arriving in the UK, https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/news/immigration-update-home-secretary-announces-14-day-quarantine-for-international-passengers-arriving-in-the-uk

Back to Top


7. New Publications and Items of Interest

Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers: ·

The latest immigration news is at https://www.abil.com/news.cfm. ·

The latest published media releases include:

  • ABIL Says Proposed Change to Public Charge Rule Would Exclude Immigrants from Government Programs: https://www.prweb.com/releases/abil_says_proposed_change_to_public_charge_rule_would_exclude_immigrants_from_government_programs/prweb15737932.htm
  • New Data Show Increase in H-1B Denials and RFEs: https://www.prweb.com/releases/new_data_show_increase_in_h_1b_denials_and_rfes/prweb15673632.htm
  • ABIL Urges Administration to Change “Buy American and Hire American” Executive Order: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2018/05/prweb15485457.htm
  • ABIL Member Kuck Baxter Immigration Commercial Nominated for an Emmy: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2018/05/prweb15485460.htm

–   ABIL Members Note Immigration Threats for Employers in 2018: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2018/03/prweb15261255.htm

  • ABIL is available on Twitter: @ABILImmigration.
  • Recent ABIL member blogs are at http://www.abilblog.com/.

Back to Top


8. ABIL Member / Firm News

Dagmar Butte (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-butte.cfm?c=US) was quoted by Forbes in “USCIS Disputes Improperly Denying 900 H-1B Visa Registrations.” She said, “I think USCIS needs to do a better job, given the lessons learned, to provide full transparency between what employers and representatives see and to identify common error triggers and warn of them more effectively. Employers don’t want to game the system and they should at least have the opportunity to fix errors that are baked into the limitations of the system. The Department of Labor has a system that flags these kinds of things to prevent employers from inadvertently doing something that will get the case denied. I think USCIS needs to fix or create warnings for when one of the events they outline is about to happen.” The article is at .

Foster, LLP, has published several new blog postings. “U.S. Immigration Considerations for COVID-19 Pandemic and CARES Act” is at https://www.fosterglobal.com/blog/us-immigration-considerations-for-covid-19-pandemic-and-cares-act/. “Four Tips to Secure an H-1B Approval” is at https://www.fosterglobal.com/blog/four-tips-to-secure-an-h-1b-approval/.

Foster, LLP, hosted a webinar, “Navigating COVID-19: Essential Immigration-Related Updates for Human Resources in a Telecommuting Environment” on April 9, 2020. For more information, see .

Jeff Joseph, of Joseph & Hall, P.C., was quoted by Law360 in “Orgs Say Gov’t Wrongly Denied Market Analysts H-1B Visas.” Commenting on a new nationwide class action lawsuit, MadKudu, Inc. v. USCIS, he said that USCIS’ decision-making, with respect to its pattern and practice of denying H-1B nonimmigrant employment-based petitions for market research analysts positions filed by businesses in the United States, is “nonsense” and disregards “substantial evidence that clearly establishes that market research analysts are a specialty occupation. Under USCIS’ twisted logic, my English literature degree rendered me uniquely unprepared to take on the professional specialty occupation of immigration lawyer.” The article is available by subscription at https://www.law360.com/articles/1264849. The complaint is at https://www.aila.org/infonet/complaint-filed-in-district-court-challenging.

Charles Kuck (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-kuck.cfm) was featured on Univision’s Conexion show discussing, “What is the Impact of Trump’s Executive Order Limiting Legal Immigration?” The video is at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-CwHxutj9JI.

Mr. Kuck was quoted by the Times of India in “Class Action Lawsuit Against H-1B Denials for Market Research Analysts Gathers Steam.” Mr. Kuck said, “USCIS does not like being sued. The class action lawsuit actually resulted in USCIS re-opening and approving the plaintiff’s H-1B applications for market research analysts. We would love for more employers and employees to join our suit—there is no cost in doing so.” The article is at .

Mr. Kuck served as one of the plaintiffs’ attorneys in MadKudu, Inc., v. USCIS. A related press release is at https://www.aila.org/advo-media/press-releases/2020/class-action-lawsuit-seeks-to-challenge-uscis. The complaint is at https://www.aila.org/infonet/complaint-filed-in-district-court-challenging.

Mr. Kuck was quoted by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution in “Doctors, Humanitarian Workers Rushing to Help as Virus Spreads.” Mr. Kuck noted the impact on immigrant families of the COVID-19 crisis. “If they are afraid to get tested and it starts running rampant in their communities, it is only going to make it worse for us. It is not going to stay isolated in one place,” he said. See https://www.ajc.com/news/breaking-news/immigrants-refugees-georgia-vulnerable-amid-coronavirus-pandemic/pJJFmzOZzyiUTJRyiEBzoM/

Mr. Kuck was quoted by Breitbart in “Report: India’s H-1B Companies Ask Labor Department to Let Foreign Workers Stay Amid Crash.” Among other things, he said, “Our H-1B system simply does not contemplate this [mass shutdown] scenario that is happening right now.” The article is at https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/04/03/indias-h-1b-companies-ask-labor-department-to-let-foreign-workers-stay-amid-crash/.

Mr. Kuck participated in Georgia Public Broadcasting’s “Political Rewind” to talk about immigrants in detention and how they are being affected by the pandemic, along with other topics. See https://www.gpbnews.org/post/political-rewind-jails-risk-becoming-georgias-next-hotspot.

Mr. Kuck‘s latest Immigration Hour podcast, “COVID-19 and USCIS, ICE, and EOIR – How to NOT Respond to a Crisis,” is at https://soundcloud.com/user-474250731/covid-19-and-uscis-ice-and-eoir-how-to-not-respond-to-a-crisis.

Mr. Kuck published a new blog posting. “Employment, Furlough, and Termination Options for Employers and Their Nonimmigrant Workers (H-1B, L-1, E-2, TN, O-1, and F-1 OPT)” is at .

Robert Loughran (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-loughran.cfm) was interviewed on Austin ABC affiliate KVUE on April 25, 2020, regarding the impact of President Trump’s Proclamation Suspending Entry of Immigrants. The video is at https://www.kvue.com/article/news/politics/austin-immigration-lawyer-presidents-trump-executive-order-immigration/269-096a3083-1b27-42ef-b2a2-dece603e956b.

Mr. Loughran presented a webinar, “Practicing Through Pandemic,” regarding adapting the practice of law in the midst of COVID-19. The webinar was hosted by the American Immigration Lawyers Association’s Texas Chapter and the San Antonio Bar Association’s Texas Chapter on April 3, 2020. For more information, see https://zoom.us/meeting/register/u5wvdOugrTssIi2JLhrdc_IXuKEV_xXZ6Q.

Cyrus Mehta (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-mehta.cfm) has authored or co-authored several new blog postings. “The Beneficial Impact of the Supreme Court’s Decision in Kisor v. Wilkie on H-1B Denials” is at http://blog.cyrusmehta.com/2020/05/the-beneficial-impact-of-the-supreme-courts-decision-in-kisor-v-wilkie-on-h-1b-denials.html. “The Differing Impact of Foreign Entity Changes on an L-1 Extension and EB-1C Petition” is at http://blog.cyrusmehta.com/2020/05/the-differing-impact-of-foreign-entity-changes-on-an-l-1-extension-and-eb-1c-petition.html. “FAQ Relating to Skilled Workers in the Green Card Backlogs During COVID-19” is at . “Changes in Salary and Other Working Conditions for Nonimmigrant Workers in L-1, O, TN, E and F-1 Status Due to COVID-19” is at . “Building the Legal Case to Challenge Trump’s Immigration Ban” is at http://blog.cyrusmehta.com/2020/04/building-the-legal-case-to-challenge-trumps-immigration-ban.html.Mr. Mehta spoke on “Ethics and Immigration: Spotlight on Select Rules and Client Representation During COVID-19” on May 18, 2020. He presented a briefing on fundamental ethical rules, how they pertain to immigration practice, and considerations when ethical issues arise in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Mr. Mehta addressed the four C’s of professional conduct rules: competence, communications, confidentiality, and conflicts, as well as other key rules requiring attention by lawyers during the pandemic. For more information or to order, see https://www.pli.edu/programs/ethics-and-immigration-spotlight-on-select-rules-and-client-representation-during-covid-19.

Mr. Mehta published an article on LinkedIn shortly after President Trump issued a proclamation banning permanent immigration to the United States for 60 days with possible extensions, with some exceptions. The article, “Trump Cannot Be Allowed to Rewrite Immigration Laws Based on Whim and Caprice,” is at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/trump-cannot-allowed-rewrite-immigration-laws-based-whim-cyrus-mehta/.

Mr. Mehta was quoted in the following publications on President Trump’s order:

  • Law360, “Can Trump End Immigration? Wording Matters, Scholars Say,” https://www.law360.com/articles/1265963/can-trump-end-immigration-wording-matters-scholars-say
  • Economic Times, “Trump’s Plan to Suspend Immigration Would Affect Indians Waiting to Migrate to U.S.,” https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/nri/nris-in-news/trumps-plan-to-suspend-immigration-would-affect-indians-waiting-to-migrate-to-us/articleshow/75272497.cms
  • Times of India, “If U.S. Immigration is Temporarily Suspended, Legal Experts Foresee a Plethora of Lawsuit[s],” https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/if-us-immigration-is-temporarily-suspended-legal-experts-foresee-a-plethora-of-lawsuit/articleshow/75266086.cms
  • India Times, “Trump Stops Green Cards for 60 Days Overseas. H-1B Visa Could Be Next,” https://www.newsindiatimes.com/trump-stops-green-cards-for-60-days-overseas-h-1b-visa-could-be-next/
  • Business Insider, “Trump’s Executive Order Suspending Entry of Immigrants is ‘Drastic and Damaging,’ Says U.S. Immigration Attorney,” https://www.businessinsider.in/international/news/trumps-executive-order-suspending-entry-of-immigrants-is-drastic-and-damaging-says-us-immigration-attorney/articleshow/75310925.cms
  • South Asian Times, “Trump’s Immigration Ban Not Affecting H-1B Visa,” https://thesouthasiantimes.info/vol-12-issue-51/ (see the next page of the e newspaper)

Mr. Mehta‘s posting was quoted by Breitbart in “Report: India’s H-1B Companies Ask Labor Department to Let Foreign Workers Stay Amid Crash.” He said, “If an employee works from a home which is within commuting distance of the workplace, then there is no need to file an amendment.” But, he added, “if an employee works from a home which is NOT within commuting distance from the workplace, the employer should obtain a new LCA for that location and file an H-1B amendment.” The article is at https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/04/03/indias-h-1b-companies-ask-labor-department-to-let-foreign-workers-stay-amid-crash/.

Mr. Mehta and Stephen Yale-Loehr (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-loehr.cfm?c=US) were quoted by the Times of India in “Medical Insurance a Burden for Laid-Off H-1B Workers.” Among other things, Mr. Mehta said, “Employer plans are generally of a higher quality, and employers are able to purchase these higher quality plans at a discounted group rate from the insurance company. In most cases, the employer pays most of the premium and the employee pays a smaller percentage. When the employee is terminated, the employee pays the whole cost of the insurance [under COBRA] and the employer generally does not pay.” Mr. Yale-Loehr said that many laid-off H-1B workers do not know about COBRA benefits or may be afraid to ask. “They should consult an experienced insurance agent to understand their rights. And many employers may not realize they need to provide COBRA continuation coverage to a terminated H-1B worker,” he noted. The article is at https://bit.ly/2XhFQFe.

David Isaacson, of Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners PLLC, has authored a new blog posting. “My Comment on the Proposed Affidavit of Support Revisions: Do You Have One Too?” is at http://blog.cyrusmehta.com/2020/04/my-comment-on-proposed-affidavit-of-support-revisions-do-you-have-one-too.html.

Cora-Ann Pestaina, of Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners PLLC, has authored a new blog posting. “LCA Posting Requirements at Home During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Do I Post on the Refrigerator or Bathroom Mirror?” is at https://bit.ly/34yaHkb. Angelo Paparelli (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-paparelli.cfm) has authored a new blog posting. “No Whine Before Its Time: USCIS Recognizes Immigration Successorship in Interest for Multinational Executives and Managers” is at https://bit.ly/3bHkkPw. Mr. Paparelli authored an op-ed published by Bloomberg Law on how immigrants can help us attack COVID-19 and revive the economy. “Insight: Legal Immigration Can Help Revive the Economy—If We Let It” is at https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/insight-legal-immigration-can-help-revive-the-economy-if-we-let-it. Mr. Paparelli was quoted by Law360 in “Shielded From Green Card Ban, EB-5 Investors Still At Risk.” The article discusses the risks to those who invested in projects that are under construction and are halted due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Those with pending EB-5 petitions must alert USCIS of any significant changes to the project during the estimated two-year processing time. An investor may be required to file a new petition if the changes are significant enough, causing the applicant to lose their spot in line for a green card, sometimes for years. “This throws the EB-5 program into absolute turmoil and ambiguity,” Mr. Paparelli said. The article is at https://www.law360.com/construction/articles/1269542/shielded-from-green-card-ban-eb-5-investors-still-at-risk. Mr. Paparelli, partner at Seyfarth Shaw LLP, and William Stock (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-stock.cfm?c=US), partner at Klasko Immigration Law Partners LLP, were quoted by Law360 in “Axed H-1B Work Visa Policies May Not Be Gone For Good.” Mr. Paparelli noted that USCIS will not stop trying to issue rule changes through policy memoranda unless it is forced to do so. “So what are the levers of pressure that can be placed on them? Congress, money or politics,” he said. Mr. Stock said that many of the immigration guidance memos the Trump administration has issued have gone too far and tried to change regulations without rulemaking. “This administration certainly has seemed to care less than other administrations have about whether the guidance they are promulgating would be inconsistent with the regulations,” he said. The article is available by registering at https://www.law360.com/articles/1276864/axed-h-1b-work-visa-policies-may-not-be-gone-for-good. Pearl Immigration has posted a summary of information on U.S. consulate closures around the world and related information due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The summary is at https://www.immigrationlaw.com/u-s-consulate-closures-due-to-covid-19/. Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Inside Higher Ed in “Trump Administration Reportedly Considers Restrictions on Foreign Student Work Program.” Mr. Yale-Loehr noted that the Trump administration could take a number of actions in relation to Optional Practical Training (OPT). He said that he thinks President Trump is likely to instruct the Department of Homeland Security “to start rulemaking, because I think he’s getting a lot of pushback from companies that rely on OPT. A proposed rule would give him political cover while not actually suspending the OPT program.” The article is at https://bit.ly/2MaCYVE. Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Univision in “Corte de apelaciones falla en contra de una medida de Trump que prohíbe la entrada de migrantes sin seguro médico.” The article discusses an appeals court ruling against a Trump administration measure prohibiting the entry of uninsured migrants. If effective, “the new temporarily suspended rule would affect more than half of all immigrants. The 2-1 decision … confirmed the temporary suspension decision issued in November,” he said. He further noted that the majority opinion of the 9th Circuit panel of judges maintains that “the lower court adequately determined that the plaintiffs would suffer irreparable harm in the form of a long separation from their loved ones abroad. The majority also noted that the President does not have unlimited power to deny immigrant visas based on purely domestic concerns.” The article (in Spanish) is at https://bit.ly/3blFD94. Mr. Yale-Loehr co-authored “Challenging H-1B Denials in Federal Courts: Trends and Strategies” (Apr. 27, 2020), which includes details on Miller Mayer research into recent H-1B cases, summaries of recent cases, and strategies and takeaways for employers to use in future lawsuits, https://millermayer.com/2020/challenging-h-1b-denials-in-federal-courts-trends-and-strategies/Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Univision in “Demanda contra el gobierno por negar ayuda a matrimonios mixtos revive el temor al uso de datos privados.” The article (in Spanish) discusses a lawsuit challenging the exclusion of certain immigrants from receiving coronavirus stimulus checks. Mr. Yale-Loehr noted that the legal precedent in this case could be in favor of the government. “I wish MALDEF the best, but I fear that they may lose their case,” he said. “In Mathews v. Díaz, 426 US 67 (1976), the Supreme Court held that “Congress regularly establishes rules regarding foreigners that may be unacceptable if applied to citizens” (426 US at 80) and that “there is no constitutional duty to provide all foreign citizens with the same benefits provided to citizens,” he added. “The Court held that such disparate treatment by Congress regularly does not necessarily imply harmful discrimination,” he said. The article is at https://www.univision.com/noticias/inmigracion/demanda-contra-el-gobierno-por-negar-ayuda-a-matrimonios-mixtos-revive-el-temor-al-uso-de-datos-privados.  Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by the Toronto Globe and Mail in “Trump Freezes Some Immigration to U.S., May Stop Temporary Work Permits, Citing Coronavirus.” Mr. Yale-Loehr said, “First, if the purpose of the proclamation is to protect against the coronavirus, it makes no sense to temporarily suspend entry of people applying for green visas but not those coming temporarily to the United States. Second, if the purpose is to protect U.S. workers, it also makes no sense to exclude temporary foreign workers from the proclamation.” The article is at https://www.theglobeandmail.com/world/us-politics/article-trump-freezes-some-immigration-to-us-may-stop-temporary-work/. Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Huffington Post in “Trump Signs Order Suspending Some Immigration During Coronavirus Pandemic.” He said before the order was released that an order to ban all immigration to the United States would be “outrageous and likely unconstitutional,” noting that the United States has “never done that before, even during world wars.” The article is at https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-executive-order-immigration-coronavirus_n_5e9f3bf1c5b6a486d08048b5?guccounter=1. Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by China Daily in “U.S. Immigration Suspension Draws Criticism.” He said, “If the executive order (had) suspended all immigration to the United States, it would surely be challenged as unconstitutional.” The article is at http://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202004/23/WS5ea0cea1a3105d50a3d18214.html. Mr. Yale-Loehr was interviewed on The Take, a podcast from Al Jazeera, about the history of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program and how the Supreme Court might rule in a few weeks. The podcast, “When ‘Dreamers’ Self-Deport,” is at https://www.aljazeera.com/podcasts/thetake/2020/05/dreamers-deport-200522152026157.html. Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Law360 in “Can Trump End Immigration? Wording Matters, Scholars Say.” He noted that if the order targeted anyone already in the United States, it would also raised constitutional concerns. The article is at https://www.law360.com/immigration/articles/1265963. Mr. Yale-Loehr was also quoted by several other publications on the same topic:·         Financial Times, “Donald Trump Suspends Key Routes to U.S. Immigration for 60 Days,” https://www.ft.com/content/7060ba17-03b5-48d6-94d1-37c6d99c5f0a (available by subscription only)·         Express (UK), “Trump ‘Pauses Immigration’ to Put Americans First in Line for Jobs After COVID-19 Lockdown,” https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1272096/donald-trump-immigration-ban-US-coronavirus-job-market-employment-death-toll-latest ·         AZ Central, “Trump Wants to Shut Down Immigration to Slow the Coronavirus and Protect American Jobs. Here’s How That Could Backfire,” https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/immigration/2020/04/21/trumps-immigration-shutdown-plan-could-backfire-coronavirus-covid-19/3000121001/·         Vox, “Trump’s Executive Order to Stop Issuing Green Cards Temporarily, Explained,” https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/4/21/21229286/trump-immigration-ban-executive-order-coronavirus ·         Univision, “Esto es lo que se sabe hasta ahora de la orden de Trump de suspender la inmigración a EEUU,” https://www.univision.com/noticias/inmigracion/esto-es-lo-que-se-sabe-hasta-ahora-de-la-orden-de-trump-de-suspender-la-inmigracion-a-eeuu Mr. Yale-Loehr of Miller Mayer LLP; Cornell Law School, together with additional Cornell departments; and Catholic Charities of Tompkins/Tioga Counties, presented a webinar on new changes to immigrants’ access to public benefits and the impact of COVID-19 care on the public charge analysis. The webinar, “Immigrants, Public Benefits, and COVID-19,” was held April 13, 2020. For more information or to download the slide deck and handouts, see https://cornell.app.box.com/folder/109666262652.

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2020-06-01 11:49:242023-10-16 14:30:35ABIL Global Update • June 2020

ABIL Global Update • April 2020

April 01, 2020/in Global Immigration Update /by ABIL

In this issue:

1. IMMIGRATION AND TRAVEL-RELATED IMPLICATIONS OF THE CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC: AN OVERVIEW – This article provides an overview of policies and procedures related to the novel coronavirus/COVID-19 outbreak in various countries, as of late March. The situation is rapidly evolving day by day, so readers are advised to check reliable sources frequently for updates.

2. CANADA – The Québec immigration department is closing a month-long consultation period with stakeholders on four questions intended to revamp a fast-track immigration stream leading to permanent residence in Canada for francophone foreigners living in Québec.

3. COLOMBIA – Several updates have been announced with respect to reform of entry permits, investing in Colombia, and a new special permit for Venezuelans.

4. SCHENGEN AREA – A new Schengen code regulation came into force.

5. UNITED KINGDOM – There have been changes in the Immigration Health Surcharge fee and in the minimum Tier 2 salary for Indefinite Leave to Remain applications.

6. New Publications and Items of Interest – New Publications and Items of Interest

7. ABIL Member / Firm News – ABIL Member / Firm News

Download:

ABIL Global Immigration Update – April 2020


1. IMMIGRATION AND TRAVEL-RELATED IMPLICATIONS OF THE CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC: AN OVERVIEW

This article provides an overview of policies and procedures related to the novel coronavirus/COVID-19 outbreak in various countries, as of late March. The article includes brief updates on European Union Member States and the U.S. borders with Canada and Mexico, followed by country-by-country summaries. The situation is rapidly evolving day by day, and many countries are escalating restrictions on travel, borders, airports, and ports. Before traveling, check with the country of destination and the airline about what measures are being enforced.

European Union Member States

EU Member States have implemented various measures and restrictions for coping with the coronavirus crisis. A link to each country’s website with travel advice and indications, as of March 18, 2020, is at https://www.mazzeschi.it/mazzeschi-asiadesk/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/travel-advice-list.pdf. See also https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2020/EN/COM-2020-115-F1-EN-MAIN-PART-1.PDF

U.S. Borders with Canada, Mexico

President Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau agreed to close the U.S.-Canada border as of March 18, 2020, to “non-essential traffic,” such as recreation and tourism, for an indefinite period. President Trump tweeted that “[t]rade will not be affected,” and workers who live on one side and work on the other are expected to continue traveling across the border for work. Similarly, the United States and Mexico are limiting nonessential travel across the border, with exceptions.

More information:

  • Washington Post, “Trump, Trudeau Agree to Close U.S.-Canada Border to ‘Nonessential’ Traffic,” https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/trump-trudeau-us-canada-border-coronavirus/2020/03/18/90a27da8-6924-11ea-b199-3a9799c54512_story.html
  • The Guardian, “Trump Announces U.S.-Canada Border Traffic Closed to ‘Nonessential’ Traffic,” https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/18/us-canada-border-closed-non-essential-traffic
  • Washington Post, “Americans, Canadians Scramble to Get Home Before Border Largely Shuts Down,” https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/americans-canadians-scramble-to-get-home-before-border-largely-shuts-down/2020/03/20/bd997a20-6a4e-11ea-b199-3a9799c54512_story.html
  • S.-Mexico border restriction notice, https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2020-06253.pdf
  • Al Jazeera, “U.S. Border Closings,” video news report, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdv8ga_lP48

 

 

Country-by-Country Summaries

Canada

The Canadian government, in line with its “speed over perfection” approach, adjusts and revises travel policies on a daily basis. The situation remains fluid. with many moving parts. Note that all individuals returning to Canada must self-isolate for 14 days, regardless of citizenship.

The following is effective as of Friday, March 27, 2020:

It is still unclear at the moment how and if visa-exempt workers, who would normally apply for their work permits directly upon arrival, will be allowed to travel to Canada. The situation for pre-approved individuals and those holding valid documents has been clarified:

  • Students who have valid study permits or an IRCC pre-approval letter (“letter of introduction”) dated March 18, 2020, or before, may travel to Canada by land or air.
  • Workers with valid work permits or pre-approval letters from IRCC (“letter of introduction”) may travel to Canada, regardless of industry.
  • New workers who will be employed in critical industries such as agriculture, food processing, health, transportation and emergency services may also travel to Canada.
  • Individuals whose permanent residence has been approved and who hold a Confirmation of Permanent Residence (COPR) issued on or before March 18, 2020, may also travel to Canada in order to activate their permanent residence. They must show the COPR upon boarding the plane.
  • Transit through Canadian airports is still allowed, provided the individual is not seeking to be admitted to Canada.
  • Canadian citizens with dual or multiple citizenship may exceptionally travel back to Canada on their foreign passports, provided they obtained an email from IRCC granting them special authorization.
  • Anyone, regardless of citizenship, returning from abroad must self-isolate for 14 days. Canadians being repatriated and landing at one of the four airports receiving international flights (Montreal, Toronto, Calgary and Vancouver) and who need to take a domestic connecting flight will be quarantined at one of the airport hotels for 14 days, before being allowed to embark on a plane to their final Canadian destinations. Accommodation and food will be provided by the government.
  • Severe penalties such as fines and prison sentences have been established under the Quarantine Act for anyone violating it. Foreign workers, students, and permanent residents could become criminally inadmissible if convicted of one of the more severe offenses under the Quarantine Act.

Immigration-related services in Canada are provided by various provincial and federal administrations, such as Service Canada; Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC); and provincial governments such as the Québec Ministry of Immigration. As companies were forced this week to transition to remote work and only “essential” services were allowed to stay open, all government offices have had to adjust quickly to allow their personnel to work remotely. Depending on the administration, some immigration processes still rely heavily on paper-based submissions.

 

 

So far, the following adjustments have been announced:

IRCC:

  • Permanent Residence and Citizenship applications can still be sent in hardcopy to IRCC, as their processing center in Sydney remains open.
  • Hardcopy submissions for visitor records, study permits, and work permits are discouraged and should be done online.

Service Canada:

  • Most agents are working remotely.
  • Service Canada will allow employers increased flexibility in reporting changes to working conditions (e.g., wage fluctuation, temporary layoffs).
  • Submissions for Labour Market Impact Assessments (LMIA) can now be submitted by email, in addition to fax.
  • 12- and 24-month reviews for Labour Market Benefit Plans are suspended.
  • On-site compliance inspections are suspended.

Québec Ministry of Immigration (MIFI):

  • 95% of their personnel works remotely.
  • MIFI is expected to announce measures to streamline their operations regarding paper submissions soon.

Anticipated Developments

Clarification is awaited on the following elements:

  • Will IRCC emulate France, Australia, and New Zealand’s initiative and automatically extend status documents by 3-6 months?
  • Will MIFI allow electronic signatures and electronic submission of applications?
  • Service Canada is discussing labor mobility for in-Canada workers on closed work permits. Will workers be allowed to move and/or change employers more easily?
  • Will Service Canada ease recruitment requirements for LMIAs?

The following was effective as of Friday, March 20, 2020:

U.S.-Canada Land Border

  • All “non-essential” travel across the land border is prohibited. This includes, among others not yet defined, travel for tourism and recreation.
  • Exceptions exist for supply-chain workers to guarantee continued supply of goods, fuel, and medication in Canada and the United States, as well as for travel for essential work.
  • In the latest announcements, it was confirmed that individuals with valid work permits and study permits may also travel back to Canada.
  • No “flagpoling” for any visitor, foreign worker, or foreign student already in Canada. They must apply online to extend or modify their status.
  • This measure does not include or apply to returning Canadian citizens, permanent residents (PR), and First Nations, including their non-Canadian/non-PR/non-First Nations family members. Family members include spouses and common-law partners, as well as dependent children and their dependent children.

Air Travel to Canada

Airlines must deny boarding to certain travelers. The following is a summary:

  • All symptomatic persons, regardless of citizenship, and any foreign visitor traveling for non-essential purposes, will be denied boarding on airlines.
  • The following groups of people will be allowed to board, along with their family members (see definition above): Canadian citizens, Canadian permanent residents, First Nations, and Members of the Canadian Forces, provided they are asymptomatic.
  • Also allowed to travel by plane: flight crew members, diplomats, Canadian forces on official travel, and persons specifically authorized by Canadian consular officers, the Minister of Health, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, the Minister of Public Safety, and the Chief Public Health Officer.
  • Valid work and study permit holders are also allowed to board a flight to Canada, subject to whether they are asymptomatic.
  • It is unclear whether individuals who have not yet activated their work or study permits will be allowed to board. It is likely that airlines will not allow boarding to avoid noncompliance with Canadian regulations and potential fines.
  • Travel by plane for essential work in Canada is also allowed, but it is recommended to heavily document the necessity to travel, as airlines may be reluctant to allow boarding in practice.

Immigration attorneys recommend that temporary workers and students whose status expires in the next 6 months may wish to submit an application for renewal online, and remain in Canada for the foreseeable future and avoid all travel abroad, as they may face complications when re-entering Canada.

Imminent changes to the border closure policy:

  • Contrary to what was announced recently, U.S. citizens and individuals who have been residing in the United States in the past 2 weeks will no longer be able to travel to Canada by land or air for tourism or recreational purposes.
  • It appears that U.S. citizens with work permits to Canada will continue to be allowed into Canada, but will have to abide by the 14-day self-isolation period upon their admission.
  • Essential travel remains allowed to protect trans-border supply chains.

The following best practices are recommended for Canadian employers and foreign workers:

  • As noted above, work or study permit holders should remain in Canada. If they exit the country, there is a possibility that they may not be able to re-enter Canada.
  • Companies should review the expiration dates of all their temporary foreign workers (SIN starting with a 9). Processing times for in-Canada renewals are currently already at 89 days, and will likely increase further due to increased volume of applicants from inside Canada, and lower staffing at Immigration Canada.
  • Renewals should be initiated well in advance. Submitting a renewal application 6 months before the expiration date is recommended.
  • Layoffs of foreign workers may affect their immigration status, capacity to remain in Canada and renew their work permits, and companies’ ability to use the Temporary Foreign Worker Program in the future. Companies should attempt to re-hire laid-off personnel, including foreign workers, as soon as they are able to.
  • Companies that have received Labour Market Impact Assessments (LMIA) usually must ensure that the subsequent work permit based thereon be activated within 6 months. In light of the current economic situation, the Canadian government has announced that companies can delay the arrival of the foreign worker, and the activation of the work permit, up to 9 months after LMIA issuance.
  • Many service providers who are essential to Canadian immigration applications—for instance, who issue police clearance certificates, provide immigration medical examinations, offer language testing in English and French, and issue educational credential evaluations—have temporarily ceased their operations. Immigration Canada said it will consider deadline extensions on a case-by-case basis. Notably, biometrics can now be completed in 90 days instead of 30, even if the templated biometrics letter states 30 days.

Colombia

Colombia is restricting entry by all passengers who are not Colombian residents or citizens. Colombian citizens and foreign residents who arrive must perform an obligatory 14-day period of self-isolation after arriving in Colombia.

Additional developments include:

  • Maritime, land, and river borders are closed until May 30, 2020.
  • Visa applications will not be processed at Colombian consulates.
  • President Duque has declared a National Emergency. Anyone age 70 or older must self-isolate until May 30, 2020. The order allows senior citizens to leave their homes for essential errands in supermarkets, banks, and pharmacies.
  • Airports are closed to international traffic. Flights are still leaving Colombia, but disruptions and cancellations are highly likely.
  • The Colombian government published a further decree putting the entire country on lockdown. The nationwide quarantine aims to “flatten the curve” of the expansion of COVID-19 among the population, especially the most vulnerable.
  • The Ministry of Foreign Affairs will accept visa applications for processing and electronic approval but will not make visa stamps in the passport.
  • Migración Colombia will suspend the deadlines for canceling special stay permits (PEP), and the expiry of the authorized stay for holders of entry and stay permits for “other activities” (POA), other than for Shore Pass and maritime or river crew. Likewise, the immigration authority may abstain from initiating administrative action or grant an opportunity for amendment under preventive isolation measures for those cases in which visa registration and the issuance of a foreigner’s ID card (cédula de extranjería) is required.

There have been 608 confirmed cases of the novel coronavirus in Colombia as of March 28, 2020.

France

The Ministry of Interior announced a three-month validity extension of residence permit documents expiring between March 16 and May 15, 2020, including long-stay visas, residence permits, provisional residence permits, asylum application certificates, and receipts for residence permit applications. This measure applies only on national territory. It is recommended that those with expired residence permits not leave France.

The borders of the Schengen Area remain closed during the 30-day period that began March 17, 2020. Non-European nationals will not be able to enter during this time. See https://www.karlwaheed.fr/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/client_alert_26032020_v1.pdf

Hong Kong

As the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak continues to expand across the globe, international immigration lawyers find themselves in various stages of the crisis management lifecycle, having to advise clients and companies with business travel and immigration needs.

This short update summarizes some of the special directives of the Hong Kong government to contain the spread of the virus and the impact on immigration law practitioners.

Hong Kong is requiring compulsory quarantine for 14 days for all persons, regardless of nationality, entering from all jurisdictions except for Macau, Taiwan, and mainland China. After the 14 days of home quarantine, those persons will be subject to another 2 weeks of medical surveillance.

In addition, the government has closed all but three border checkpoints:  the airport, the Shenzhen Bay Bridge, and the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau Bridge. Flights from China have been greatly reduced, and cross-border rail connections as well as cross-border ferries have also been suspended.

Impact on Operations of the Hong Kong Immigration Department

The Hong Kong Immigration Department (HKID) is now reopened for all services after a period when all government employees were advised not to go to the office but to work from home, except for staff of departments providing emergency services and essential public services such as urgent extension of visa applications and passport applications and renewals. All other services were suspended, including new applications for employment visas, change of sponsor, non-urgent applications for extension of stay, Hong Kong Identification Card appointments, and collection of approved visas.

While the HKID has reopened, new employment visa applications and applications for change of employment sponsor and non-urgent applications for extension of stay will be delayed because of a backlog of existing applications and a large number of new applications. Employers therefore should be prepared for a delay in their employees’ start of employment.

Certificate of No Criminal Conviction Office

The Hong Kong Police Force’s Certificate of No Criminal Office has implemented the following measures to reduce the number of people gathering at the office.

  • Applicants are encouraged to make an appointment through the Online Booking System or through the auto-telephone answering system at 2396-5351.
  • In addition, there will be 60 places for applicants without appointment by the distribution of discs, which are distributed at 8:45 a.m. each day. Those allocated a disc should return to the office for processing of their application at the designated time slot on the same day stated on the disc.
  • Applicants are advised to wear masks, and their body temperature will be checked before entering the office. Those who have fever or respiratory symptoms will be told to leave.
  • As a result of reduced personnel during the government policy of not requiring non-essential employees to go to the office, the processing of Hong Kong Police Certificates for those seeking to immigrate will likely be delayed.

High Court Registry Services

Many Citizenship By Investment programs require documents such as birth certificates, marriage certificates, divorce certificates, and affidavits not only to be notarized but also legalized by the Hong Kong High Court Registry through an apostille stamp in accordance with the Hague Convention. These services had been curtailed completely for a period of time as the High Court Registry had temporarily closed for such services.

The High Court Registry Office has now reopened and legalizations of documents are being processed routinely.

U.S. Consulate Operations

As of March 19, 2020, the U.S. Consulate General in Hong Kong and Macau has suspended all routine immigrant and nonimmigrant visa services. The consulate said it will resume routine visa services as soon as possible but is unable to provide a specific date. There is no fee to change an appointment, and visa application fees are valid for one year.

To reschedule an immigrant visa appointment, use the Visa Inquiry Form at https://hk.usconsulate.gov/visas/visa-inquiry-form/

To request an emergency nonimmigrant visa appointment for immediate travel to the United States for medical reasons, funerals, urgent business travel, or urgent exchange visitor (J-1) or student (F-1) travel, use the Visa Inquiry Form at https://hk.usconsulate.gov/visas/visa-inquiry-form/

U.S. Citizen Services, such as applications for passports or registering for a consular report of birth of a U.S. citizen abroad, continue to be available by appointment.

Other Neighboring Regions

Macau

The Macau government has introduced temperature screening at all border checkpoints, including the airport, land crossings, and ferry terminals. All inbound travelers must complete a health declaration form upon arrival. Ferry services between Hong Kong and Macau are suspended.

On February 20, 2020, the Macau government began enforcing medical checks for tourists who have been to areas with a high incidence of the novel coronavirus within a 14-day period. The Macau government has also established processing centers at the Macau Federation of Trade Unions Workers Stadium and the Taipa Ferry Terminal to screen passengers for symptoms of COVID-19.

Tourists whose medical check results meet the requirements of the Health Bureau will be allowed to continue their trip. Those who do not meet the Health Bureau requirements may be subject to compulsory quarantine in addition to criminal prosecution in accordance with local law. Individuals who have been to South Korea are subject to a 14-day observation in quarantine at a designated venue in Macau. The costs of quarantine in designated hotels will be borne by the individuals themselves.

Philippines

On February 2, 2020, President Rodrigo Duterte issued a temporary travel ban on visitors from China, Hong Kong, and Macau to curb the spread of the coronavirus.

Taiwan

Taiwan restricts Hong Kong and Macau travelers from entry until a 14-day home or hotel quarantine passes upon landing in Taiwan.

In addition to an earlier decision to ban Mainland Chinese nationals from entering Taiwan, Taiwan has also imposed restrictions on Hong Kong and Macau citizens traveling to Taiwan and has raised a travel alert for both cities to Level 2, according to the island’s Center for Disease Control (CDC). Foreigners who have been in mainland China over the past 14 days are also banned from entering Taiwan.

Foreign nationals seeking to enter Taiwan for special reasons can apply for an entry visa as long as they have not visited or stayed in mainland areas severely affected by the coronavirus outbreak, including Hubei, Guangdong, and Zhejiang provinces, according to the Foreign Ministry.

These persons must provide documents of their travel history in the past 14 days, a health certificate, and various other paperwork.

Taiwan has also suspended the issuance of entry permits on arrival and online processing of entry permits for Hong Kong and Macau residents.

Italy

Following the recent outbreak of coronavirus cases in the North of Italy, parts of the country have limited access in and out of some areas, as well as particular restrictions on work and public activities. Extraordinary health measures have been implemented in Italy and across Europe.

The validity of all permits, authorizations, certificates, clearances with an expiration date between January 31, 2020, and April 15, 2020, has been extended until June 15, 2020. As a consequence, residence permits (permessi di soggiorno) with an expiration date between January 31, 2020, and April 15, 2020, will be valid until June 15, 2020. Applications for renewal can therefore be applied for until after 60 days from June 15, 2020.

The validity of Italian identification documents (e.g., identity cards, passports) expiring March 17 or later is extended until August 31, 2020.

In addition, all applications pending as of February 23, 2020, or filed after that date are suspended in the period between February 23, 2020, and April 15, 2020. This means that any applications that have been filed during this period will not be processed between February 23, 2020, and April 15, 2020.

Travel To and Within EU Countries

As noted above, EU Member States have implemented various measures and travel restrictions. See the links at the top of this feature article for more information.

30-Day Suspension Permit of Stay Procedures (permesso di soggiorno)

On March 2, 2020, the Italian government published a Law Decree, effective immediately, containing measures to support families, workers, and companies with respect to the COVID-19 outbreak (Law Decree 2 March 2020, n. 9). In the effort to employ as much public staff as possible to control the current health situation, the Italian government suspended the issuance of permits of stay for 30 days (starting March 2) but has also temporarily suspended the terms to file permit applications for a period of 30 days (initial permits must be filed within 8 days from entry; extensions at least 60 days before expiration).

Obligations to file applications within the deadline above are lifted due to the 30-day suspension, and non-EU nationals who may not be able to meet the deadlines due to public offices’ unavailability will not incur any consequences. Strong delays in issuance of permits, and in general in all immigration-related procedures, are expected.

See https://www.mazzeschi.it/news/italy-30-day-suspension-permit-of-stay-procedures-permesso-di-soggiorno/

National Travel Restrictions

Emergency Measures Extended Nationwide

On March 9, 2020, the Italian government published a decree extending restrictive measures to the entire country in an effort to contain the spread of COVID-19 across Italy. New measures implemented in the “Red Zones” (areas most affected) only a day ago are now applied nationwide. Italy is now on lockdown, with the new “I stay at home” Decree, limiting all social activities, with all public events and indoor activities (e.g., concerts, fitness centers, theaters) suspended/closed. Schools and universities will remain closed until April 3. Restaurants and bars can only be open until 6 p.m. and must follow strict health guidelines (e.g., maintaining a safe distance between people) or will be fined.

Individuals who are quarantined or test positive for the virus are forbidden to leave their homes and to travel. Travel is allowed only for documented work, health, or other serious reasons. Those traveling outside their region or city can do so only out of serious necessity. It is mandatory to provide a signed self-certification on the reason for travel. The required self-certification can also be signed before a police officer, who can provide the required form. At the airport, travelers must show not only the travel document but also the signed self-certification. Individuals landing in Italy must declare the reason for travel upon entry.

The government has published some guidelines and FAQS. An English translation is at https://www.mazzeschi.it/2020/03/11/faq-on-the-iorestoacasa-decree-of-9-march/. See also https://www.mazzeschi.it/news/italy-new-decree-introduces-covid-19-related-measure/

Travelers Leaving Italy

For Italian citizens or individuals traveling from Italy, many countries are enforcing a travel ban, and mandatory or voluntary quarantine. The restrictions change day by day. Before traveling, check with the country of destination and the airline about what measures are being enforced.

Travelers Arriving in Italy

As of late March, there was no travel ban or mandatory quarantine on incoming travelers, but:

  • All incoming travelers (even for internal flights) are subject to temperature checks.
  • Travelers must submit a declaration confirming the purpose of their visit and the countries they have visited.
  • On discretion of the authorities, they may be asked to do a 2-week quarantine at their domicile.

Flight Cancellations

Most airlines have suspended or canceled flights to and from Italy for the entire month of March and beginning of April. Those restrictions change day by day; it is advisable to check with the country of destination and the airline regarding what measures are being enforced.

Health Measures

The government has closed down schools and most businesses, including a number of administrative and governmental offices such as local police offices or post offices. Some governmental offices have adopted limited access and working hours to avoid risks and contamination. All schools and universities are closed until April 3 and closure can be extended. All sports events and public gatherings have been banned. Restaurants and bars must stay closed, as well as all businesses and retail stores, with the exception of grocery stores, pharmacies, tobacco shops, and newsstands (keeping the appropriate safe distances)

People can travel between cities only for emergency reasons and can face fines and up to 3 months in jail for breaking quarantine rules. Those who have to leave their region or their city out of serious necessity can do so only if they have self-certification stating that they must cross the borders for compelling business or health reasons, or because they have to return home.

What happens if non-EU nationals overstay their visa, or—for non-visa nationals (like USCs), their 90-day allowances?

There have been reports from non-EU nationals who, due to flight cancellations or the risk of being quarantined upon arrival, cannot return to their countries and will be overstaying their visas or 90-day allowances (for non-visa nationals). Both the Schengen Visa Code, which applies in all Schengen countries (e.g., Germany, France, Spain, Netherlands, Poland), and Italian immigration law have provisions that allow individuals to extend their stay if they cannot leave the country for reasons of force majeure.

With respect to the Schengen Visa Code, according to the Schengen rules, a short-term visa can be issued for a stay of a maximum 90 days in 180 days, allowing the holder to be in the Schengen countries for the period indicated in the visa. Normally the holder must leave the Schengen area when the visa expires, but in some circumstances it is possible to request an extension of an issued visa.

Article 33 of the Schengen Visa Code provides that if someone is unable to leave before his or her visa expires for reasons of force majeure, humanitarian reasons, or serious personal reasons, he or she can request an extension of the Schengen visa.

The request for an extension of the visa is to be addressed, before the visa expires, to the authorities of the Schengen State where the holder is, even if the visa was not issued by that state consulate. In Italy, the request must be addressed to the local police office (Questura). In this case the extension must be mandatorily granted (while if the extension is requested for business reasons, the authority to which it is submitted has discretion).

See https://www.mazzeschi.it/2018/08/09/grounds-for-extension-of-short-term-schengen-visas/

With respect to Italian immigration law, normally it is not possible to convert a short-term stay (for tourism/business) into a permit directly in Italy (an exception being family reasons). However, when the foreigner cannot or does not want to return to the country of provenance for reasons related to an exceptional unsafe situation (for instance, Chinese nationals who did not or could not return to China because of the COVID-19 outbreak), he or she should consider applying for a temporary residence permit for “calamity” reasons (Article 20-bis of Italian immigration law). Such a permit can be issued when the country to which the foreigner should return has a situation of contingent and exceptional calamity that does not allow a safe return and stay. The permit is valid for 6 months, can be renewed for an additional 6 months, and allows the foreigner to work. However, it cannot be converted into a permit for work allowing a longer stay.

See https://www.mazzeschi.it/news/emergency-grounds-for-extending-your-stay-in-italy/

Useful Links:

  • http://www.viaggiaresicuri.it/home
  • “Viaggiare Sicuri” is part of the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (also called Farnesina), and functions as its crisis unit, leading operations and communications among all government institutions in Italy and all over the world. It operates in times of emergency to keep Italian citizens informed and protected: http://www.viaggiaresicuri.it/home
  • http://www.protezionecivile.gov.it/home
  • Department of Civil Protection, Presidency of the Council of Ministers. In charge of coordinating policies and dealing with safety and protection strategies in case of emergency: http://www.protezionecivile.gov.it/home
  • Department of the Italian government in charge of public order, safety, and defense. Contains updates on Italian policies regarding coronavirus: https://www.interno.gov.it/it
  • Italian Department of Health – in charge of national policies and institutions dealing with health. Contains helpful information on COVID-19 and health measures to fight the infection: http://www.salute.gov.it/portale/home.html
  • World Health Organization (WHO) – useful tips and recommendations for international traffic: https://www.who.int/ith/2019-nCoV_advice_for_international_traffic-rev/en/
  • WHO – Coronavirus Highlights: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200301-sitrep-41-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=6768306d_2
  • See also https://www.mazzeschi.it/2020/03/11/faq-on-the-iorestoacasa-decree-of-9-march/; https://www.mazzeschi.it/2020/03/04/covid-19-summary-for-foreigners-and-travelers-in-italy/; https://www.mazzeschi.it/news/italy-new-decree-introduces-covid-19-related-measure/

Peru

Recently, the Supreme Government Administration of Peru enacted some provisions to prevent and control coronavirus spread in the country. A summary of selected highlights is below.

  1. By Ministerial Resolution N° 055-2020-TR, signed by the Minister of Labor, the “Guide for the Prevention of Coronavirus (COVID-19) in the Labor Area” has been approved, with which specific guidelines are provided to employers, so that within the framework of their responsibilities, they comply with the proper containment and care of cases of diagnosed or suspected coronavirus in the workplace.

Related links:

https://www.gob.pe/institucion/minsa/campañas/699-conoce-que-es-el-coronavirus

https://www.gob.pe/8371-ministerio-de-salud-que-son-los-coronavirus.y-como-protegerte

https://www.gob.pe/8663-ministerio-de-salud-como-prevenir-el-coronavirus

https://www.gob.pe/8662-ministerio-de-saliud-coronavirus-en-el-peru

Communication and Information Measures: The HR offices, with the Committees or Supervisors of Occupational Safety and Health, must prepare a Communication Plan referring to the measures to be adopted by the company; prepare and disseminate messages based on official MINSA information and informative talks; and enable information points, among others.

Control Measures: Workers who have cold symptoms and report that they have been in contact with people who were diagnosed as having suspected, probable, or confirmed cases of coronavirus or who, 14 or fewer days before, visited areas at risk of transmission of this virus, according to the official list of countries with reported cases of COVID-19 on the MINSA website, are instructed to go to the nearest public or private medical center to have a medical evaluation or call the MINSA toll-free line, 113.

Likewise, workers should comply with the preventive measures adopted by the employer, attend corresponding training, use personal protection elements, and proceed responsibly to implement prevention and control measures.

Measures for organizing work activities are determined as well, among them telework (teletrabajo), using information technologies and telecommunications, and taking into account the nature of the activity or function performed by the worker under the Telework Law and Its Regulations, in case it could be applicable.

  1. By Supreme Decree N° 008-2020-SA, a Declaration of Sanitary Emergency has been established nationwide for 90 calendar days and dictates prevention and control measures for COVID-19.

Within a period not exceeding 72 hours, by means of a Supreme Decree, the MINSA must approve the Action Plan and the list of goods and services required to be contracted to face the health emergency.

Various prevention and control measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19 have been established, including sanitation and migration controls, quarantines, restrictions on activities or events that involve the concentration of people in ways that increase the risk of transmission, and preventive health measures.

  1. By Urgency Decree N ° 025-2020, urgent and exceptional measures have been enacted to strengthen the System of Surveillance and Sanitary Response with respect to coronavirus in the Peruvian territory.

With regard to “Teletrabajo,” special rules and norms will be established in the public and private sectors.

These legal norms will be in force until December 31, 2020.

  1. By Supreme Decree No. 008-2020-MTC, flights coming from Europe and Asia, and from the Peruvian territory to such destinations, are suspended for a period of 30 calendar days from March 16, 2020. This term may be extended by Ministerial Resolution issued by the Peruvian Ministry of Transport and Communications, based on information from the health authority and taking into account the evolution of the pandemic.
  2. By Supreme Decree No. 044-2020-PCM, on March 15, 2020, a State of National Emergency was declared in Peru due to the serious circumstances affecting the nation’s citizens’ lives as a result of the pandemic. The State of Emergency was decreed for 15 calendar days, until March 30, 2020.

The National State of Emergency established a compulsory social isolation quarantine.

The temporary and total closure of the borders was decreed as well, suspending the international transport of passengers by land, air, sea, and river, among other regulations.

Before that occurred, passengers entering Peruvian territory had to comply with a compulsory social isolation (quarantine) of 15 calendar days.

  1. By Urgency Decree N° 026-2020, on March 15, 2020, several temporary and exceptional measures were established to prevent the spread of the virus in the Peruvian territory, including the ability granted to employers in the public and private sectors to modify the worksites of their staff to implement remote work (e.g., a home office) and its particular characteristics.
  2. On March 16, 2020, an Official Communication was issued by the Peruvian Immigration Authority (MIGRACIONES) with which the public was informed about the suspension of operations for a period of 15 calendar days due to the National State of Emergency in the country.

As of late March, MIGRACIONES’ offices are closed during the emergency period and no services are available to the public.

  1. By Supreme Decree No. 046-2020-PCM, on March 18, 2020, clarifications were made regarding the legal dispositions indicated in item #5 above, specifically regarding the “limitation to the exercise of the right to freedom of movement of persons,” initially decreed, in the sense of intensifying these measures to control the expansion of the coronavirus. In short, a “curfew” (compulsory social immobilization) was imposed in the country from 8 p.m. until 5 a.m. every day during this emergency period.

Private vehicles are no longer allowed to be driven on public roads, except for authorized people who provide essential services and goods (as established by law).

  1. On March 21, 2020, MIGRACIONES has authorized the rescheduling of appointments related to administrative procedures and services once the State of Emergency has ended, as well as the suspending of administrative deadlines and fines with regard to migratory regularization, among other provisions established by the Superintendence Resolution No. 000104-MIGRACIONES, issued in the official gazette, “El Peruano.”

Russia

Visas and work permits for foreigners staying in Russia will be extended. A related official letter from the Internal Affairs Ministry has been released. All air travel has been suspended between Russia and foreign countries, except for evacuation of Russian citizens from abroad. All public events are banned until April 10, 2020. Schools, universities, and other educational institutions’ work is suspended until April 12, 2020.

Starting March 25, 2020, the following categories of foreign citizens and stateless persons can cross the Russian border despite the border block:

 

  • Diplomats and consular workers, other officials;
  • Persons with ordinary private visas, issued in connection with the death of their close relative. A death certificate will be required as well as a document confirming the family connection;
  • Family members (spouses, parents, children, adoptive parents, adopted children), other caretakers of Russian citizens, entering the Russian Federation, provided they present an ID document, visa, or enter in visa-free mode, plus a document confirming the family connection; that is, foreign citizens will be able to cross the Russian border if they are traveling with their family members who are Russian citizens;
  • Foreign citizens who have permanent residence permits in Russia; and
  • Persons transit-traveling through air border checkpoints in Russia without crossing the Russian border.

The official letter, № 1/2964, “On additional measures for prevention of coronavirus infection (2019-nCoV),” was sent to the field on March 19, 2020. According to the letter, territorial divisions of the Internal Affairs Ministry are ordered to:

  • On the application of foreign nationals who entered Russia based on visas, extend their existing visas for up to 90 days regardless of the purpose of visit and visa type. In cases where the visa has expired, the foreigner’s stay will be extended for up to 90 days based on the person’s written application. Subsequently, they will be issued transit visas to exit the country;
  • On the application of foreign citizens who entered Russia without visas or based on international agreements on short-term visa-free travel, as well as in cases where the allowed period of stay has expired, extend the foreigner’s period of temporary stay in Russia for up to 90 days based on the person’s written application. Subsequently, they will be issued transit visas to exit the country;
  • In cases where visa or non-visa foreigners lack migration cards, process duplicates along with their address registration applications (without an extended or even a valid visa);
  • Allow those who wish to exit Russia to receive an exit visa;
  • Not apply administrative punishments to these people related to deportation, administrative removal, or readmission for migration law violations.

Foreign citizens whose stay in Russia will be extended will be photographed and fingerprinted.

If Internal Affairs Ministry officials identify foreigners who are in Russia illegally, they will be told that they must legalize their status and will be given appropriate information on how to do it. Administrative sanctions will not be applied.

The official letter also orders territorial divisions of the Internal Affairs Ministry to:

  • Continue accepting, processing, and issuing the following types of migration documents for foreigners who are staying in Russia at the moment:
  1. Corporate Work Permits;
  2. Work Permits;
  3. Patents (without the need to cross the Russian border in case a 2-year stay period is over, without any administrative sanctions);
  • Temporary Residence Permit (TRP) and Permanent Residence Permit (PRP):

If these documents expire or are close to expiration, extend the applicant’s stay in Russia for up to 90 days based on the foreigner’s application. Issuance of PRPs (extended) will be done irrespective of the existing PRP expiration date as well as in cases where the PRP has already expired;

  • Annulments:

Work permits, TRP, PRP, and certificates of participants in state programs for the return of compatriots to Russia, will not be annulled even after the expiration of the 6-month term of a person’s stay abroad if the document holder cannot enter Russia.

Details of procedures described above, processing times, and lists of the required documents will be soon confirmed with the Internal Affairs Ministry Migration Department.

Turkey

The Interior Ministry issued a press release with the following information.

Germany, Spain, France, Austria, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Belgium, Holland—For these countries, in which the coronavirus is spreading, the Interior Ministry shared a Circular with various authorities indicating that:

  1. Passenger entries from these countries to Turkey are being stopped through all border gates (Tüm hudut kapıları – see below).
  2. Citizens of these countries, and of third countries who have been in these countries within the last 14 days, will not be permitted to enter Turkey.
  3. There will not be any restrictions on exiting Turkey for the nationals of these countries.
  4. Turkish nationals’ travel to these countries has been temporarily suspended.
  5. Regarding the countries that were “taken” (very unclear meaning) according to the procedures and principles determined by the Ministry of Health outlined for China, Iran, Iraq, South Korea, and Italy, inspection, control, and 14-day surveillance and quarantine operations will be followed when necessary.

Reference: https://www.icisleri.gov.tr/81-il-valiligi-ve-hudut-idare-mulki-amirliklerine-genelge

Note: The phrase Tüm hudut kapıları means all entry points via land, air, railway, and sea, according to the Ministry of Commerce website: https://www.ticaret.gov.tr/gumruk-islemleri/gumruk-idareleri/hudut-kapilari/hudut-kapilari-genel-bilgiler

As of March 17, 2020, the following countries’ flights to Turkey are also now banned: England, Switzerland, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Ireland, and the United Arab Emirates. The number of countries for which Turkey bans flights has increased to 20.

See https://www.sozcu.com.tr/2020/gundem/son-dakika-saglik-bakani-kocadan-yeni-corona-aciklamasi-5682606/

Migration Directorate restrictions: The Migration Directorate, which oversees residence permit adjudication, Temporary Protection Status, and other immigration applications, has begun to limit applications. Unfortunately, the specifics are not yet clear. It appears that appointments in Istanbul may now be canceled without notice.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs restrictions: Turkish consular posts around the world are so far responding in various ways to the virus. Checking for the most up-to-date status for posts is imperative. In general, posts are either:

  1. In full operation;
  2. Only allowing visa filings by post or bonded courier (i.e., no in-person applications); or
  3. Restricted to limited appointments or fully closed to visa services.

Ministry of Labor restrictions: A posted notice at the main gate of the MOL states that the Public Relationships Department was closed until further notice. This means that attorneys will not be able to enter the MOL building to make queries in person on work permit cases. All queries will need to be by phone, which is not particularly effective, according to reports.

There also appears to be a slowdown on the progress of adjudications, as seen via the online system. Cases appear to be taking longer to move through the steps of processing, from upload to officer review to adjudication. Anticipate longer timelines.

Useful links for travel to Turkey amid the pandemic period:

  • See International Airport Transport Association-IATA country-by-country English language alerts. Countries can be easily added to this list, so check for updates. https://www.iata.org/en/programs/safety/health/diseases/government-measures-related-to-coronavirus/
  • Turkish Airlines air travel restrictions on boarding and reservation changes (check for updates): https://www.turkishairlines.com/en-int/announcements/coronavirus-outbreak/index.html

United Kingdom

There is still a lack of clarity in terms of visa applications being submitted around the world and in the United Kingdom (UK).

Attorneys are urging UKVI and the Home Office to update its guidance of February 27, 2020, to provide greater clarity. In the meantime, below are updates.

Visa Application Centers Around the World

Many application centers are still open for those individuals who wish to submit visa applications. As expected, however, there are a number of closures and interruptions to the usual service standards. These include:

  • Asia Pacific: Due to closure of the Manila regional visa hub, there are currently no priority services for applicants applying in, for example, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, Singapore, and Hong Kong.
  • USA: All non-premium biometric application service centers ASCs operated by USCIS in the United States are closed. The Premium Application Centers (PACs) all remain open for the time being, except for the PACs in Seattle and San Francisco, which are currently closed.
  • Europe: All TLS contact centers are closed for UK visa applicants.
  • UK: Sopra Steria application centers in the UK remain open for the time being. There have been reports of closures at some locations for certain application types (e.g., local libraries and councils).

Sponsored Workers

  • Tier 2 workers with 30-day entry visas who are unable to travel: Where the visa holder cannot travel within the 30-day entry visa period, they must normally obtain a fresh visa and attend a biometric appointment abroad. Attorneys have asked for this to be waived and for those whose BRPs have been issued to be able to travel to the UK when they are able to do so without the need for a new visa.
  • Tier 2 visa holders: remote working and reporting: The Home Office confirmed that where a sponsored worker is required to work from home as a result of coronavirus, the sponsor is not required to report a change of work location.
  • Ending the employment of sponsored workers: Where sponsors are considering ending sponsored workers’ employment, contact your Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers attorney for advice. A report would need to be made to the Home Office and the individual would then have a period of curtailed leave in order to try to regularize their UK immigration status.
  • Absences and Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR): There have been queries about the effect of absences on ILR, particularly from staff stuck outside the UK. At present, guidance for absences over the 180 days permitted under Tier 2 allows excess absences resulting from natural disaster and for those involved in humanitarian rescue operations overseas. This guidance is expected to be updated to include coronavirus-related issues with traveling and returning to the UK. The best advice at present is to ensure that Tier 2 holders keep clear evidence of why they were unable to return, such as the lack of flights, national government edicts preventing local and international travel, or medical advice against travel.

Other Issues

  • Those with visas expiring in the UK: Chinese nationals and those normally resident in China have in some circumstances had their visas automatically extended to March 31, 2020. Extensions may well be required for others who have imminently expiring visas.
  • Right-to-work (RTW) checks: For new starters who have just arrived in the UK where the office is closed, remote working is in place or, where the person is having to self-isolate, there may be issues with completing RTW checks. Alternatives are available:

Details and more information: https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/news/immigration-update-coronavirus

Back to Top


2. CANADA

The Québec immigration department is closing a month-long consultation period with stakeholders on four questions intended to revamp a fast-track immigration stream leading to permanent residence in Canada for francophone foreigners living in Québec.

The topics the Québec government is consulting on are:

  1. Which eligibility criteria should the immigration department apply in their selection of workers and students intending to fast-track their permanent residence?
  2. How can immigrants be encouraged to settle outside the urban centers?
  3. Should the selection criteria prioritize experience gained in Québec, or immigrants whose profile match the labor market needs, or both?
  4. How can “overqualification” be avoided? Should graduates become eligible for fast-track permanent immigration only after 1 year of work experience, and should the work experience have been obtained in their field of study, or at a level that matches their qualification?

The Québec immigration department had been heavily criticized for having attempted to overhaul the fast-track immigration process without public consultations in the fall of 2019, and had been forced to withdraw their bill.

Details:

  • Consultation sur le Programme de l’expérience québécoise (PEQ), http://www.mifi.gouv.qc.ca/fr/dossiers/consultation-peq.html
  • Québec government’s Consultation Guide, http://www.mifi.gouv.qc.ca/publications/fr/dossiers/DOC_consultation.pdf

Back to Top


3. COLOMBIA

Several updates have been announced with respect to reform of entry permits, investing in Colombia, and a new special permit for Venezuelans.

Reform of Entry Permits

As of December 1, 2019, Resolution 3167 of 2019 issued by Migración Colombia is effective. This resolution establishes new guidelines for the entry, stay, and departure from the national territory of nationals and foreigners. The new resolution reorganizes the entry and stay permits (PIP) in three categories, which will allow foreigners of unrestricted nationalities to enter the country not intending to establish a domicile or profit, for short periods. The length of stay of PIPs will vary according to each category.

See http://www.tannus.co/en/reform-of-entry-and-residence-permits/

Investing in Colombia

The Colombian government decided to increase the legal monthly minimum wage (SMMLV) by 6% in 2020, which means that it is equivalent to $877,803 Colombian pesos (about $260 USD) per month. Those companies that wish to obtain visas for foreign personnel that require proof of solvency must take into account that the amounts contemplated in the immigration regulations and requested by the authorities are calculated in minimum wages. This is why, in cases where bank statements, certificates of incorporation and representation, among others, must be presented, such documents are expected to reflect the values requested, taking into consideration the corresponding adjustment for 2020, under penalty of receiving requirements or inadmissibility of the visa applications submitted.

See http://www.tannus.co/en/keep-in-mind-when-investing-in-colombia/

New Special Permit for Venezuelans
The Colombian government has continued simplifying the immigration regulations for Venezuelan nationals so they can continue to enter and regularize their immigration status in the country. Among the measures established by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is the possibility of their entering, transiting, and leaving the national territory, even if the Venezuelan passport has expired.

See http://www.tannus.co/en/new-special-permit-for-venezuelans/

Back to Top


4. SCHENGEN AREA

A new Schengen code regulation (Regulation (EU) 2019/1155 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 amending Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 establishing a Community Code on Visas) came into force February 2, 2020.

This reviewed regulation applies to all third-country nationals who need a visa for intended stays in the territory of the European Union (EU) Member States not exceeding 90 days in any 180-day period.

The regulation sets forth the procedures and conditions for issuing Schengen visas. The following general principles apply:

  • The Member States must act in full compliance with EU law and according to its general principles and decisions when applying this regulation.
  • The Member States must take the decisions under this regulation on an individual basis.
  • The application procedure should be as easy as possible for applicants.
  • The relevant Member State to resolve an application must be clearly identifiable.
  • The Member States must promote electronic processes, including electronic submission, interviews, and signatures when available.
  • Deadlines should be established for each step of the process to allow applicants to plan ahead.
  • Frequent or regular travelers (among other categories, business people, artists, and athletes) complying with the regulation might benefit from multiple-entry visas with longer periods of validity.

Benefits

As a result of the new regulation, the Schengen visa application process is expected to be much more flexible, allowing electronic procedures when possible, allowing submission of applications within the 6 months before the visit (instead of within 3 months as established before), and permitting the resolution of the application as a matter of urgency in justified cases, even if it was not submitted at least 15 days before the trip.

Another benefit of the regulation, together with flexibility, is the clarity about authorities in charge of the application (when different countries will be visited) and about processing times.

Finally, certain categories of visitors who need to travel regularly to the Member States can now obtain visas with longer duration, provided they have complied with the applicable regulation.

The increase in the processing fee (up to 80 euros) may be reasonable if the process becomes as flexible and efficient as expected by this modification.

Back to Top


5. UNITED KINGDOM

There have been changes in the Immigration Health Surcharge fee and in the minimum Tier 2 salary for Indefinite Leave to Remain applications.

Immigration Health Surcharge fee increase: The latest budget includes an increase in the Immigration Health Surcharge (IHS) for overseas nationals to use the National Health Service. It was only 2 years ago that the IHS fee doubled to £400 per year of the visa, and now it is set to increase to £624 per year of the visa. The government had announced its intention to increase the IHS fee in November last year. The new fees will apply to non-European Union (EU) citizens starting in October 2020 and to EU citizens starting in January 2021.

As has previously been the case, those with student or Tier 5 (Youth Mobility Scheme) visas will pay a lower charge of £470 per year of the visa. There is a small concession under the new IHS fee arrangements in a lower charge for children under 18 of £470.

Minimum Tier 2 salary for ILR applications: In a number of rule changes announced recently, the Home Office has confirmed a freeze on the increase in minimum salary requirements where sponsored Tier 2 (General) workers are applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR). The current minimum is either £35,800 or the minimum expected amount for the type of job, whichever is higher. That amount was due to increase to £36,200 on April 6, 2020, but the new announcement confirms the government will be following the advice of the Migration Advisory Committee which, in its report of January 28, 2020, recommended a freeze on this threshold while the policy for ILR applications is considered.

Back to Top


6. New Publications and Items of Interest

Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers: ·

The latest immigration news is at https://www.abil.com/news.cfm. ·

The latest published media releases include:

  • ABIL Says Proposed Change to Public Charge Rule Would Exclude Immigrants from Government Programs: https://www.prweb.com/releases/abil_says_proposed_change_to_public_charge_rule_would_exclude_immigrants_from_government_programs/prweb15737932.htm
  • New Data Show Increase in H-1B Denials and RFEs: https://www.prweb.com/releases/new_data_show_increase_in_h_1b_denials_and_rfes/prweb15673632.htm
  • ABIL Urges Administration to Change “Buy American and Hire American” Executive Order: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2018/05/prweb15485457.htm
  • ABIL Member Kuck Baxter Immigration Commercial Nominated for an Emmy: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2018/05/prweb15485460.htm

–   ABIL Members Note Immigration Threats for Employers in 2018: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2018/03/prweb15261255.htm

  • ABIL is available on Twitter: @ABILImmigration.
  • Recent ABIL member blogs are at http://www.abilblog.com/.

Back to Top


7. ABIL Member / Firm News

Dagmar Butte (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-butte.cfm?c=US) was quoted by Forbes in “Critics Charge Slow Immigration Processing Nets USCIS Billions in Fees.” Ms. Butte noted, “Particularly in change of employer cases or amendments due to a new work location, [premium processing is] a necessity. While under the law, the employee can, in theory, go to a new employer or location upon filing, the rising denial rates mean there is a great deal of risk to the employee if he or she moves prior to an approval.” The article is at .

Leslie Ditrani, of Chin & Curtis LLP, was quoted by Law360 in “Visa Issues Abound as Firms, Consulates Close for COVID-19.” Ms. Ditrani said an attorney at the firm had a client get a visa approved, but the consular office in London closed before they could get the necessary stamp. She said she would advise any client to follow the law and request a new labor condition application when required, such as if an H-1B specialty occupation worker has to move to a new location due to COVID-19 issues. But with the government requesting extra evidence for nearly half of H-1B petitions in the first quarter of fiscal year 2020, subjecting an immigration request to new scrutiny can carry its own risks, she noted. “Someone might be trying to do the right thing by posting because it’s more than 50 miles and then amending, and then find themselves with [a Request for Evidence] or even a denial,” she said. Disruptions in workplace functions could also make it difficult for employers and immigrants to meet filing deadlines and remember administrative requirements. “If someone is concerned about their health and being quarantined, it’s hard to wrap your head around the complex and nuanced rules regarding immigration status,” Ms. Ditrani noted. The article is at https://www.law360.com/articles/1253720/visa-issues-abound-as-firms-consulates-close-for-covid-19.

Klasko Immigration Law Partners, LLP, will host its 16th annual spring seminar on Wednesday, April 22, 2020. All professionals in the field of employment-based immigration are invited to attend to learn the latest hot topics and trends in employment-based immigration from the industry-leading immigration lawyers at Klasko. For details or to register, see https://www.klaskolaw.com/event/klasko-2020-annual-spring-seminar/.

Klasko Immigration Law Partners, LLP, has published a blog posting, “Coronavirus Considerations for H and L Status Employees.” The coronavirus (COVID-19) has been dominating news stories across the globe. Many employers are making preparations or recommendations to staff members to work from home, particularly those returning from travel. How will these work-from-home directives affect H and L status employees who have specific worksite requirements? The blog is at .

Charles Kuck (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-kuck.cfm) was quoted by Law.com in “Lawyers Push for Change to Immigration Court Amid COVID-19 Concerns.” Mr. Kuck said that he is planning to wear protective gloves and wipe down his chair and table with sanitary wipes the next time he attends a hearing, but “[y]ou need bond hearings to continue.” He said he thinks the government should release to detained immigrants who are not a danger to the community. “You certainly want people to have an opportunity to have their day in court, without waiting the next three to six months for COVID-19 to pass.” The article is at https://www.law.com/texaslawyer/2020/03/18/lawyers-push-for-change-to-immigration-court-amid-covid-19-concerns/.

Mr. Kuck was interviewed by Global Atlanta in “Immigration Limbo: How Trump’s COVID-19 Bans and Border Measures Are Affecting Foreign Travelers, Workers.” The article is at https://www.globalatlanta.com/immigration-limbo-how-trumps-bans-and-border-restrictions-are-affecting-foreign-travelers-and-workers/.

Mr. Kuck has released a podcast in the #ImmigrationHour series. “The S. 386 Lee Betrayal” is at https://soundcloud.com/user-474250731/the-s386-lee-betrayal. Cyrus Mehta (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-mehta.cfm) was quoted by Forbes in “Trump Immigration Official Entered Illegally.” He identified four additional USCIS policy changes that can potentially be challenged in light of Judge Moss’s ruling: (1) changes in residence requirements for transmitting U.S. citizenship to children living overseas, especially children of U.S. government employees overseas; (2) removing means-tested criteria to the fee waiver grounds, especially as they relate to naturalization applicants; (3) closing USCIS international offices; and (4) filing I-407s for abandonment at a designated USCIS office in Vermont rather than at a U.S. consulate. Mr. Mehta said he believes there may be additional policies that can be challenged. The article is at https://www.forbes.com/sites/stuartanderson/2020/03/02/trump-immigration-official-entered-illegally/#c6669951287b. Mr. Mehta has authored several new blog postings. “Immigration Attorneys on the Frontlines in the COVID-19 Crisis” is at http://blog.cyrusmehta.com/2020/03/immigration-attorneys-on-the-frontlines-in-the-covid-19-crisis.html. “How USCIS Can Remain True to Its Mission by Exercising Compassion During the COVID-19 Period” is at http://blog.cyrusmehta.com/2020/03/how-uscis-can-remain-true-to-its-mission-by-exercising-compassion-during-the-covid-19-period.html. “How Interpol Red Notices Allow Abusive Foreign Governments to Manipulate and Undermine the Integrity of Immigration Proceedings in the United States” is at .

Angelo Paparelli (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-paparelli.cfm) provided responses in “Expert Q&A: COVID-19 and Immigration,” published by Thomson Reuters Practical Law. The Q&A is at https://content.next.westlaw.com/w-024-5004?isplcus=true&transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true&bhcp=1.

Mr. Paparelli was quoted by Bloomberg Law’s Daily Labor Report in “Immigration Attorneys Ask Agencies for No-Contact Solutions.” He said, “Our outdated system of immigration law was already as complex as a Rube Goldberg contraption. This is a complete sea change of challenges.” The article is at https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/immigration-attorneys-ask-agencies-for-no-contact-solutions.

Mr. Paparelli was quoted by Law360 in “Visa Issues Abound as Firms, Consulates Close for COVID-19.” Mr. Paparelli noted that he had a client who managed to pick up an approved visa the day before the local consular office closed. Mr. Paparelli called on the government to postpone deadlines to extend people’s visa status until the agency can process requests, as it did in the wake of September 11, 2001, when the government automatically extended the legal status of people on temporary visas if they were affected by the terrorist attacks. “Strict compliance endangers lives,” he said. The article is at https://www.law360.com/articles/1253720/visa-issues-abound-as-firms-consulates-close-for-covid-19.

Rodrigo Tannus (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-tannus.cfm?c=CO) was recognized by Best Lawyers in Colombia in Corporate Immigration Law.

Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLC has published several new blog postings. “Key Takeaways from USCIS’ Public Engagement on EB-5 Inventory Management” is at https://wolfsdorf.com/blog/2020/03/13/key-takeaways-from-uscis-public-engagement-on-eb-5-inventory-management/. “European Travel Ban” is at https://wolfsdorf.com/blog/2020/03/12/european-travel-ban-client-alert/.

Stephen Yale-Loehr (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-loehr.cfm?c=US) was quoted by The Real Deal in “Could a Pandemic Bring EB-5 Back to Life?” Commenting on a proposal to scale up the EB-5 program as part of a stimulus package for the U.S. economy. “Desperate times call for innovative solutions. This could be one way to jumpstart the economy,” Mr. Yale-Loehr said. The article is at https://therealdeal.com/2020/03/24/could-a-pandemic-bring-eb-5-back-to-life/.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by the New York Times in “Appeals Court Allows ‘Remain in Mexico’ Policy to Continue Blocking Migrants at the Border.” He said, “It is very likely that the Supreme Court will grant the administration’s request to halt the Ninth Circuit’s original decision to suspend the policy.” The article is at https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/04/us/migrants-border-remain-in-mexico-mpp-court.html. Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by CNN in “Supreme Court Rules Against an Undocumented Immigrant Fighting State Prosecution.” Mr. Yale-Loehr said, “”What’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander,” noted Stephen Yale-Loehr, an immigration professor at Cornell Law School. “If the Supreme Court rules that the federal government no longer has sole responsibility for regulating immigration, lower courts may uphold pro-immigrant or sanctuary or noncooperation policies enacted by states and localities.” The article is at https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/03/politics/supreme-court-immigration-garcia-kansas-decision/index.html. Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by CNN in “Supreme Court to Consider Rights of Some Asylum Seekers.” He said the case discussed in the article is important because it “squarely raises constitutional issues. Here the Court must decide whether newly arrived immigrants have the same right to challenge their detention in federal court as U.S. citizens. Mr. Yale-Loehr noted that nearly half of all removals from the United States occur through expedited removal. “If the Court holds that the Constitution applies to arriving immigrants, the number of such deportations will surely decrease,” he said. The article is at https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/02/politics/supreme-court-rights-of-asylum-seekers/index.html.
Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2020-04-01 12:15:142023-10-16 14:30:41ABIL Global Update • April 2020

ABIL Global Update • February 2020

February 01, 2020/in Global Immigration Update /by ABIL

In this issue:

1. SHORT-TERM HIGH-SKILLED WORKER PROGRAMS: AN OVERVIEW – This article provides an overview of policies and procedures on short-term high-skilled worker programs in several countries.

2. BELGIUM – Belgium has announced 2020 gross salary thresholds.

3. CANADA – Québec attestations are now required for permanent immigrant applicants. Also, there is an update on the parent/grandparent sponsorship program.

4. COLOMBIA – This article provides information about several aspects of Colombian immigration.

5. INDIA – There has been confusion about renewals of the Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI) card. The Indian government has announced a temporary relaxation of OCI renewal guidelines.

6. TURKEY – The Republic of Turkey has released updated minimum salary amounts. Also, there has been an update regarding limitations on renewals of Touristic Residence Permits.

7. RUSSIA – This article provides an update on immigration-related developments in Russia.

8. UNITED KINGDOM – It’s happened: The UK officially left the EU on January 31, 2020. Now what?

9. New Publications and Items of Interest – New Publications and Items of Interest

10. ABIL Member / Firm News – ABIL Member / Firm News

Download:

ABIL Global Immigration Update – February 2020


1. SHORT-TERM HIGH-SKILLED WORKER PROGRAMS: AN OVERVIEW

This article provides an overview of policies and procedures on short-term high-skilled workers in several countries.

India

The Indian employment visa allows for short-term employment for an organization registered in India for a duration of generally one year. Foreign technicians are eligible for a five-year employment visa. Highly skilled foreign personnel being employed in the IT software and IT-enabled sectors are eligible for an employment visa for a validity of up to three years.

The applicant should be a highly skilled or qualified professional being employed at a senior level or as a technical expert. There also should not be a qualified Indian available for the same job that the visa holder will perform. The employment visa cannot be granted for routine, ordinary, or secretarial/clerical jobs.

Although the employment must be in an organization registered in India, it may also be granted for a person who is employed by a foreign company or organization engaged for the execution of some project in India.

The employee’s salary must be in excess of INR 16.25 lakhs (approximately $25,000) per year. However, this condition does not apply to: (a) ethnic cooks, (b) language teachers (other than English language teachers)/translators and (c) staff working for a foreign embassy or high commission in India. The salary requirement is also not applicable to an employment visa applicant who intends to do volunteer work with charities or nonprofit organizations in India.

Foreigner registration is a mandatory requirement by the government of India under which all foreign nationals (excluding overseas citizens of India) visiting India on a long-term visa (more than 180 days) must register themselves with a Foreigner Regional Registration Officer/Foreigner Registration Officer within 14 days of arriving in India. This registration can be done online. Further details are available at https://indianfrro.gov.in/eservices/home.jsp. Additional extensions of employment visas can be facilitated through the FRRO for up to five years subject to the applicant’s good conduct, production of necessary documents in support of continued employment, filing of income tax returns, and no adverse security inputs.

Further details are available in the Business and Employment Visa FAQ issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs at https://mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/work_visa_faq.pdf.

Details regarding the requirements and documentation for the employment visa are available at https://www.in.ckgs.us/visa/employment-visa.

Italy

Italian Immigration law provides for different kinds of work permits for highly skilled workers assigned to work temporarily in Italy. Under these options, workers do not become local employees but maintain an employment relationship with the home country employer. The issuance of these work permits is not subject to the yearly immigration quotas set by the government.

Intra-company work permit for highly specialized staff/managers on assignment. This procedure allows the foreign employee in a senior managerial or specialized knowledge role to be temporarily assigned (up to five years) to a subsidiary, branch, or an affiliate in Italy (sending and host companies should be part of the same business group or a joint-venture group).

ICT work permits. Intra-corporate transfer work permit for managers, specialists, trainees temporary seconded from a company established outside the European Union where the worker is employed since at least three months before transfer to a host entity established in Italy as part of the same group. Maximum duration is three years for managers and specialists, one year for trainees.

Details: “Italy Work Permits for Temporary Assignments,” https://www.mazzeschi.it/2018/11/21/temporary-assignments-work-permits-for-highly-skilled-workers/

Back to Top


2. BELGIUM

Belgium has announced 2020 gross salary thresholds.

The gross salary thresholds for work and single permits are updated every year.

The salary thresholds vary by region (Brussels, Flanders, or Wallonia) and by category of employee (e.g., highly skilled employees, executives). In general, the region with jurisdiction is determined on the basis of the primary workplace of the foreign national in Belgium, or the location of the registered office of the company, if the primary workplace of the foreign national cannot be defined.

From January 1, 2020, onward, the following gross salary thresholds apply:

CategoryFlandersBrusselsWallonia
Highly Skilled42,696 € (exception: 34,156.80 € for locally employed < 30 years or nurses)42,869 €42,869 €
Executives 68,314 €71,521 €71,521 €
Blue Cards51,235 €55,431 €55,431 €

The gross salary includes all payments to the employee in consideration for work: the amounts must be known with certainty to the employer, the employee, and the Belgian authorities before the start of the employment in Belgium. The fact that the amount must be certain excludes discretionary bonuses. In Wallonia, contributions paid for professional supplementary pension schemes are not taken into account either.

In the event of assignment, allowances, directly linked/specific to the assignment, are considered part of the salary, provided they are not paid in reimbursement of expenditures actually incurred on account of the assignment, such as expenditures on travel, lodging, and board. Travel, lodging, and board allowances are thus not considered salary. Moreover, employers must guarantee the salary in euros regardless of payroll location and/or exchange rate fluctuations.

Back to Top


3. CANADA

Québec attestations are now required for permanent immigrant applicants. Also, there is an update on the parent/grandparent sponsorship program.

Québec Attestations

Effective January 1, 2020, all permanent immigrant applicants under an economic program to the province of Québec (except children under 18) must provide the Québec immigration department with an “attestation of learning about democratic values and the Québec values expressed by the Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms.”

The Québec government says knowledge of the values it reflects is essential to an immigrant’s integration into the province.

There are two ways to obtain the attestation:

  1. Complete a 24-hour integration course; or
  2. Pass an online test of 20 questions (the pass rate is 75%).

The Québec government summarizes the five key principals underlying the attestation:

  1. Québec is a French-speaking society
  2. Québec is a democratic society
  3. Equality between women and men
  4. Rights and responsibilities of all Québecers
  5. Québec is a secular society

Details:

  • https://www.immigration-quebec.gouv.qc.ca/en/immigrate-settle/attestation-values/obtaining-attestation.html
  • http://www.mifi.gouv.qc.ca/publications/fr/gpi-npi/npi_2020/NPI_2020-001.pdf
  • Québec government’s 35-page guide: https://www.immigration-quebec.gouv.qc.ca/publications/fr/valeurs/GUI_Pratique_Valeurs_FR.pdf

Parent/Grandparent Sponsorship Program

The number of overall planned permanent admissions to Canada for 2020 is 340,000 people (just under one percent of the population of Canada). Of the 340,000 Canada is planning to admit, 21,000 are in the parent and grandparent sponsorship category.

On December 30, 2019, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) announced that the parent/grandparent sponsorship program would not be opening in January 2020: “To ensure that [IRCC] has sufficient time to complete the development of a new intake process for the 2020 Parents and Grandparents Program, the reopening of the program will be postponed until Ministerial Instructions are issued.” It was also announced that the expression of interest to sponsor a parent/grandparent that will be launched in 2020 will give a fair chance to all interested sponsors.

In 2019, IRCC was criticized as the expression of interest to sponsor filled up within seven minutes of its January 28, 2019, opening. It is anticipated that the 2020 expression of interest to sponsor a parent/grandparent will be on a lottery basis (with possible weight/advantage given to those who have previously attempted to sponsor a parent/grandparent).

Until the new intake management process is implemented, IRCC will not accept any new applications. This will ensure that all interested sponsors have the same opportunity to submit an interest to sponsor form, and a fair chance to be invited to apply.

Details:

  • https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/news/notices/parents-grandparents-2020-update.html
  • http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p1/2020/2020-01-11/html/notice-avis-eng.html

Back to Top


4. COLOMBIA

This article provides information about several aspects of Colombian immigration.
Digital Nomads
In recent years, technology has revolutionized the lifestyles of many people. The labor field is no stranger to these changes. Every day it is common to see how workers and employers join forces to find the desired balance between personal and work lives. Nowadays, thanks to digital tools such as cloud applications, laptops, smart phones, and the internet, among others, it is feasible to develop different activities without having to physically stay in the office.
Details: http://www.tannus.co/en/digital-nomads-in-colombia/
Colombian Nationality for Venezuelan Minors
In accordance with the provisions of article 96 of the Colombian Constitution, nationals by birth are nationals of Colombia when the father or mother was a Colombian citizen or national or, being the child of foreign nationals, one of their parents was domiciled in Colombia at the time of birth. Likewise, children of Colombian parents who were born abroad and then live in Colombia or are registered at a consulate are nationals of Colombia.
Details: https://www.asuntoslegales.com.co/analisis/rodrigo-tannus-serrano-510256/nacionalidad-para-menores-venezolanos-2900998
Notifications of Foreigners in RUTEC and SIRE
SIRE and RUTEC gather certain information to control the foreign population. However, there are certain differences between them, among others, such as: (1) the entities in charge of each of the registration systems; and (2) RUTEC going beyond the notification of hiring or contract termination of foreign workers, since labor migration policy will be constructed at least in part based on the information collected. SIRE and RUTEC are not exclusive, which is why the registration of information in both systems must be complied with, under penalty of sanctions.
Details: https://www.asuntoslegales.com.co/analisis/rodrigo-tannus-serrano-510256/notificaciones-de-extranjeros-en-rutec-y-sire-2911964
Orange Economy and Migration
The “orange economy” is a term that has become popular in Colombia in recent years. The idea is to develop, through the creation, production, and distribution of goods and services, technological, artistic, cultural, and creative content to generate wealth by progressively participating in the GDP. Although the government’s drive is from a national perspective, there is significant leverage for the development of this economy by various foreign agents. It is for this reason that the migratory field becomes relevant in this aspect, since musicians, actors, producers, and sportspeople, among others, will have to take into account the existing Colombian permits or visas with a view to entering and staying in Colombia legally.
Details: http://www.tannus.co/en/orange-economy-and-migration/
Degree Validation Process Update
To increase the speed and efficiency of the process of legalization of degrees for use abroad, validation of foreign degrees, and qualified registration, the Ministry of National Education issued on October 9, 2019, Resolution 010687, which establishes and/or modifies the requirements and processing times, taking into account the increasing migration of foreign professionals as well as the return of Colombians who have studied abroad.
Reform of Entry and Residence Permits
Resolution 3167 of 2019, issued by Migración Colombia, establishes new guidelines for the entry, stay, and departure of Colombian nationals and foreigners from the national territory. This new resolution reorganizes the entry and stay permits (PIP) in three categories, which allows foreigners of unrestricted nationalities to enter the country for short periods without the intention of establishing a domicile or profiting. The length of stay of PIPs varies according to each category.
Details: http://www.tannus.co/en/reform-of-entry-and-residence-permits/

Back to Top


5. INDIA

There has been confusion about renewals of the Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI) card. The Indian government has announced a temporary relaxation of OCI renewal guidelines.

In recent times, there has been much confusion with respect to the renewal of OCI cards. Airlines have on many occasions not allowed passengers to board flights to India if their OCI cards were not renewed when their passports were renewed. The OCI, which is given to persons of Indian origin who have the citizenship of another country (other than Pakistan and Bangladesh), allows the card holder to live and work in India indefinitely. The OCI also exempts from reporting to police authorities for any length of stay in India. The OCI also provides parity with Non-Resident Indians in financial, economic, and educational fields, except in the acquisition of agricultural or plantation properties. A person registered as an OCI is eligible to apply for grant of Indian citizenship under section 5(1)(g) of the Citizenship Act, 1955, if he or she is registered as OCI for five years and has been residing in India for one year out of the five years before making the application.

According to the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), the following guidelines have been in force since 2005 with respect to OCI renewals:

  • The OCI card must be reissued each time a new passport is acquired by the cardholder up to the age of 20 years.
  • The OCI card must be reissued once upon acquiring a new passport after completing 50 years of age.
  • Reissuance of the OCI card is not required each time a passport is issued to a cardholder between the ages of 21 and 50.

However, these guidelines were relaxed in recent years. Even if the OCI was not renewed in the event of obtaining of a new passport, the OCI was accepted as a valid lifelong document with no expiration date especially after the Indian government stopped issuing the U visa sticker in the person’s passport. It seems that the Indian government began to enforce its 2005 guidelines more strictly in late 2019, resulting in many instances of people having difficulty boarding flights if the OCI was not renewed in accordance with these guidelines.

The MEA, as a result, has issued the following relaxation of its guidelines until June 30, 2020, in the following cases:

  • In case an OCI card holder below the age of 20 years has not gotten the OCI card re-issued on change of passport, he or she may travel on the strength of his or her existing OCI card bearing the old passport number, subject to the condition that along with the new passport, the OCI cardholder carries the old passport mentioned in the OCI card.
  • In case an OCI card holder who has attained the age of 50 years and has gotten his or her passport renewed subsequently but has not gotten his or her OCI card reissued on renewal of his or her passport, he or she may travel on the strength of the existing OCI card along with the old and new passports.

Notwithstanding the relaxation in guidelines, the MEA advises OCI cardholders to renew their cards per the 2005 guidelines. Anecdotal evidence suggests that airlines are following the relaxed guidelines unevenly.

The Ministry of External Affairs press release relaxing the 2005 OCI guidelines is available at https://mea.gov.in/press-releases.htm?dtl/32222/Press+release+on+Relaxation+in+OCI+Guidelines+till+30th+June+2020.

The Ministry of External Affairs 2005 OCI guidelines are available at https://mha.gov.in/PDF_Other/GuidelinesOCIMiscservices_15112019.pdf.

The Ministry of External Affairs document on the OCI scheme is available at https://www.mea.gov.in/overseas-citizenship-of-india-scheme.htm.

Back to Top


6. TURKEY

The Republic of Turkey has released updated minimum salary amounts. Also, there has been an update regarding limitations on renewals of Touristic Residence Permits.

2020 Salary Requirements

As of January 1, 2020, the amounts are:

Gross minimum monthly wage: 2.943,00 Turkish Lira
Net minimum monthly wage: 2.324,70 Turkish Lira

* 1 TL = 0.17 $USD (approx. January 2020)

Aside from this minimum salary requirement, immigration law requires that the salary paid must be commensurate with the position considered. Specifically:

  • High-level managers and pilots cannot be paid less than 6.5 times the minimum wage (or 19.129,50 TRY gross/mo);
  • Department managers and engineers/architects cannot be paid less than 4 times the minimum wage (or 11,772,00 TRY gross/mo);
  • Positions requiring expertise (note: undefined) and teachers cannot be paid less than 3 times the minimum wage (or 8.829,00 TRY gross/mo);
  • Tourism Industry employees such as acrobats/similar and masseurs/spa therapists cannot be paid less than 2 times the minimum wage (or 5.886,00 TRY gross/mo);
  • All others (e.g., sales officer, low-level marketing officer) cannot be paid less than 1.5 times the minimum wage (or 4.414,50 TRY gross/mo); and
  • Household workers cannot be paid less than the minimum wage.

Update re Limitations on Renewals of Touristic Residence Permits

The Migration Directorate (MD) had announced on its website that as of January 1, 2020, it would not consider renewals of Touristic Residence Permits (RP) that had been issued for one year. According to reports, there may be possible discretionary actions to limit applicability of this significant restriction. Multiple MD sources said they anticipate an internal communique to lift the ban on renewals for nationals of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), but this has not yet been confirmed officially.

Back to Top


7. RUSSIA

This article provides an update on immigration-related developments in Russia.

Quota for engaging foreign labour in 2020 is approved. The Russian government has approved the quota for engaging foreign labor in 2020, set at 104,993 foreign nationals, a decrease from 2019, when the quota was 144,583.

Croatia—simplification of visa formalities. The Russian government has signed an agreement with the government of the Republic of Croatia regarding an amendment of the agreement between the two countries on mutual travel of citizens of the Russian Federation and Republic of Croatia. According to the new text of the agreement, citizens of each of these countries will be able to stay in the other country without visas for 90 calendar days out of each 180 days.

The agreement will come into force within 30 days from the date when the last notification is received confirming the completion of in-country ratification procedures.

Qatar—mutual cancellation of visa requirements. The government of the Russian Federation has signed an order in support of an agreement with the government of the State of Qatar on mutual cancellation of visa requirements for their citizens. According to the draft agreement, citizens of the State of Qatar will be able to enter Russia without visas for the period of 90 days out of each 180 days, provided they do not engage in work activities, study, or permanently reside in Russia. Similar privileges will be enjoyed by Russian citizens upon entry to Qatar.

The agreement remains under discussion and is not yet in force.

Agreement with the Republic of Tajikistan regarding organized recruitment of Tajik citizens for temporary work in Russia has been ratified. Federal law has ratified an agreement between the governments of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Tajikistan regarding organized recruitment of Tajik citizens for temporary work in the territory of the Russian Federation.

The agreement emphasizes the priority of collective employment of Tajik citizens in Russia, although the agreement does not prohibit Tajik citizens from searching for employment individually.

Practically, this means that a Tajik citizen who would like to work in Russia will file an application with the responsible government agency in Tajikistan. This agency will:

  • Review the application;
  • Inform about open vacancies in Russia;
  • Discuss candidates for employment with the employer in Russia;
  • Help with preparation for exams: Russian language, history, basics of legal knowledge;
  • Conduct medical tests;
  • Review candidates’ criminal history;
  • Discuss the text of the labor agreement with the employer; and
  • Organize transport to Russia and back.

Additionally, the responsible agency in Tajikistan will sign agreements with employers in Russia for the collective supply of candidates for open vacancies.

The Russian Labour Ministry will be responsible for maintaining a computer database with all information on open vacancies, and for vetting prospective employers.

The international agreement in question confirms the need for Tajik citizens to apply for work permits to work in Russia. It also confirms that such a work permit can be extended for its term without the need for the foreign national to leave Russia. It also does not state any limits on extensions.

Currently Tajik citizens work in Russia on the basis of either (1) patents for which they apply individually and which can be extended only once or (2) highly qualified specialist (HQS) work permits (application is filed by the employer). If a Tajik citizen is the holder of an extended patent, he or she must leave Russia and re-enter again in order to apply for the patent anew.

UEFA 2020—exit rules for football fans approved. The Russian government has signed an order on the approval of exit rules for foreign citizens and stateless persons who entered the Russian Federation as football spectators for events of the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) 2020. This includes foreign citizens who entered Russia as spectators of UEFA 2020 events without visas using valid personal ID documents and personalized spectator cards (fan IDs issued by the ministry of digital development, communications and mass communications) from May 30, 2020, to July 13, 2020. All foreign fans must leave the country by July 13, 2020. Staying after this date without a legally valid reason will result in administrative punishment according to Russian law.

Foreign fans must exit using valid ID documents, after border control officers establish the fact that the person entered Russia on the basis of the personalized spectator card (fan ID).

Similar rules of entry and exit applied during Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) World Cup 2018.

UEFA 2020—work permit procedure simplified. The Russian government has approved rules for simplified and speedy work permit procedures for UEFA 2020 workers. Procedures for the following were simplified:

  • Corporate work permits (permits for engagement of foreign citizens);
  • Work permits;
  • Patents;
  • Invitation letters

Simplified procedures will be applicable to foreign citizens and stateless persons who work on the basis of labor agreements or civil agreements, and who perform work activities for the following organizations:

  • UEFA;
  • UEFA subsidiaries;
  • UEFA media organizations;
  • UEFA suppliers;
  • UEFA commercial partners;
  • Local organizational structure;
  • Russian Football Association;

Applications can be submitted without allocated quotas for 2020. The Ministry of Sport will submit to the Federal Security Service by the fifth of every month a list of companies and persons (employers) for approval. The approved list then will be sent to the Ministry of Internal Affairs, which will use it to issue work permits, corporate work permits, and invitation letters using the simplified procedure. The Ministry of Sport will submit to the Federal Security Service and the Internal Affairs Ministry a list of foreign citizens by the 20th of each month. Applications will be reviewed within 7 to 15 days.

Corporate and personal work permits will be issued within 15 days from the date of application filing. Applications for patents will be issued within seven days. Applications for issuance of work permit duplicates will be issued within five days and patent duplicates within two days. Applications for invitation letters will be reviewed within 15 days. Refusal confirmations will be issued within two days.

These rules are effective as of January 12, 2020.

Quota 2020 has been divided among the Russian regions. The Ministry of Labour has issued an order on the division of the quota for the engagement of foreign labor established by the Russian government for year 2020 among the Russian regions.

Total number of work permits: 104,993
For Moscow: 3,821
For Moscow Region: 4,256
For Saint-Petersburg: 3,273
For Leningradskaya Region: 446

The order divides approved quota numbers among all Russian regions as well as professional groups.

“Work in Russia” job vacancies database—approved information requirements and rules for verification. The Russian database of job vacancies, “Work in Russia,” is an information-analytical system created by the Ministry of Labour and Social Development. The Ministry of Justice approved an order issued by the Ministry of Labour and Social Development.

The database contains:

  • Information about employers (according to the rules, such information should match the Unified State register of legal persons);
  • Information on vacancies (according to the rules, such information should not contain any discrimination based on sex, age, nationality, etc.); and
  • Information regarding citizens who look for work.

Information is verified by employees of the territorial labor office. Services for citizens who are looking for work are free of charge.

Back to Top


8. UNITED KINGDOM

It’s happened: The United Kingdom (UK) officially left the European Union (EU) on January 31, 2020. Now what?

What does this mean for people moving to and from the UK?

Nothing for now. We are in a transition period until at least December 31, 2020.

During the transition period, EU law continues to apply to the UK, which means that EU citizens can live and work in the UK in exactly the same way as before. The same applies to other European Economic Area (EEA) nationals (nationals of Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein) and Swiss nationals. British citizens also keep their free movement rights in EEA states and Switzerland during the transition period.

The British government insists that the transition period will not be extended. If there is to be an extension, this must be agreed upon before July 1, 2020.

What will happen to EU citizens already living in the UK?

EU citizens who move to the UK before the end of the transition period will be able to stay as long as they apply for the EU Settlement Scheme. The deadline for applying is June 30, 2021.

Irish citizens do not have to apply for the EU Settlement Scheme. They will still be free to live and work in the UK after the transition period. The same goes for British citizens in Ireland.

What will happen to British citizens already living in the EU?

British citizens who start exercising a right of residence in another EU Member State before the end of the transition period will be able to stay, but they need to register with the authorities. The process varies from country to country.

What will the UK’s immigration system look like after the transition period?

The British government says that after the transition period, the same rules for work visas will apply to EU citizens as to everyone else. We do not yet know what those rules will be.

The British government’s Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) published a report on January 28, 2020, that warned against replacing the current system of sponsored visas for highly skilled workers (Tier 2) with an Australian-style points-based system. The MAC recommended keeping the Tier 2 model but with significant changes, including lowering the skills threshold to include medium-skilled jobs and lowering the main salary threshold from £30,000 to £25,600.

If the British government follows these recommendations, it will be far easier for employers to sponsor people for work visas, but it will be expensive. Fees for Tier 2 visas are already high and there are no plans to lower them. If anything, they will increase. Employers who rely on EU citizens to fill medium- and high-skilled roles will be spending a lot of money on visas.

There will need to be new immigration routes for low-skilled workers, at least in the short term. We do not yet know what those will be.

Details:

  • Kingsley Napley alert, https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/news/the-uk-leaves-the-eu-today-at-11pm-gmt
  • EU Settlement Scheme and how to apply, https://www.gov.uk/settled-status-eu-citizens-families/applying-for-settled-status
  • Guide to what EU citizens living in the UK need to know, https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/services/specialist-group/brexit/brexit-what-eu-citizens-living-in-the-uk-need-to-know

MAC report, “A Points-Based System and Salary Thresholds for Immigration,” https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/migration-advisory-committee-mac-report-points-based-system-and-salary-thresholds

Back to Top


9. New Publications and Items of Interest

Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers: ·

The latest immigration news is at https://www.abil.com/news.cfm. ·

The latest published media releases include:

  • ABIL Says Proposed Change to Public Charge Rule Would Exclude Immigrants from Government Programs: https://www.prweb.com/releases/abil_says_proposed_change_to_public_charge_rule_would_exclude_immigrants_from_government_programs/prweb15737932.htm
  • New Data Show Increase in H-1B Denials and RFEs: https://www.prweb.com/releases/new_data_show_increase_in_h_1b_denials_and_rfes/prweb15673632.htm
  • ABIL Urges Administration to Change “Buy American and Hire American” Executive Order: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2018/05/prweb15485457.htm
  • ABIL Member Kuck Baxter Immigration Commercial Nominated for an Emmy: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2018/05/prweb15485460.htm

–   ABIL Members Note Immigration Threats for Employers in 2018: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2018/03/prweb15261255.htm

  • ABIL is available on Twitter: @ABILImmigration.
  • Recent ABIL member blogs are at http://www.abilblog.com/.

Back to Top


10. ABIL Member / Firm News

The following ABIL members were included as WWL Thought Leaders for Corporate Immigration 2020. For details, see https://whoswholegal.com/thought-leaders/thought-leaders-corporate-immigration:

Dagmar Butte (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-butte.cfm?c=US)

Bernard Caris (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-caris.cfm?c=BE)

Barbara Jo Caruso (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-caruso.cfm?c=CA)

Maria Celebi (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-celebi.cfm?c=TR)

Francis Chin (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-chin.cfm)

Eugene Chow (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-chow.cfm?c=HK)

Arnold Conyer (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-conyer.cfm?c=AU)

Laura Danielson (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-danielson.cfm?c=CN)

Laura Devine (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-devine.cfm?c=UK)

Rami Fakhoury (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-fakhoury.cfm?c=US)

Steven Garfinkel (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-garfinkel.cfm)

Ana Garicano (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-garicano.cfm?c=ES)

Avi Gomberg (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-gomberg.cfm?c=CA)

Kehrela Hodkinson (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-hodkinson.cfm)

Mark Ivener (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-ivener.cfm)

Kirby Gamblin Joseph (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-joseph.cfm?c=US)

Jelle Kroes (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-kroes.cfm?c=NL)

Charles Kuck (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-kuck.cfm)

Marco Mazzeschi (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-mazzeschi.cfm?c=IT)

Gunther Mävers (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-mavers.cfm?c=DE)

Cyrus Mehta (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-mehta.cfm)

Bettina Offer (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-offer.cfm?c=DE)

Ariel Orrego-Villacorta (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-orrego-villacorta.cfm?c=PE)

Angelo Paparelli (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-paparelli.cfm)

Julie Pearl (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-pearl.cfm)

Nicolas Rollason (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-rollason.cfm?c=UK)

Karl Waheed (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-waheed.cfm?c=FR)

Chris Watters (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-watters.cfm?c=ZA)

Stephen Yale-Loehr (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-loehr.cfm?c=US)

Rami Fakhoury (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-fakhoury.cfm?c=US) was also listed in Marquis Who’s Who for 2020. For details, see https://www.24-7pressrelease.com/press-release-service/469101.

Klasko Immigration Law Partners, LLP, has published a client alert. “Comprehensive Regulatory Change to Employment-Based Immigration in 2020” is at .

Klasko Immigration Law Partners, LLP, announced that Allie K. Dempsey has joined the firm as a senior associate attorney in its Philadelphia office. Ms. Dempsey provides comprehensive legal advice to corporate and individual clients on a range of immigrant and nonimmigrant matters and has significant experience in employment-based immigration matters. Klasko has offices in Philadelphia and New York and provides top-tier legal services to individuals, multinational corporations, small companies, universities, and hospitals.

Laura Rosmarin has been promoted to Partner in the Atlanta, Georgia, office of Kuck Baxter Immigration LLC. She directs the firm’s Business Immigration Department. Ms. Rosmarin has more than 20 years of experience working with businesses and individuals in securing temporary and permanent working and investment visas. Her clients include companies, academic institutions, hospitals, individuals, and families. She has represented corporate executives, professional athletes, engineers, physicians, entertainers, international students, and many professionals in various fields. Ms. Rosmarin received her B.A. degree, cum laude, from Boston University, and her J.D. degree from Emory University Law School. For more on Kuck Baxter Immigration LLC, see https://www.immigration.net/.

Cyrus Mehta (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-mehta.cfm) has authored several new blog entries. “Ethical Dimensions to Federal Court Litigation in Immigration Matters” is at http://blog.cyrusmehta.com/2020/01/ethical-dimensions-to-federal-court-litigation-in-immigration-matters.html. “The Fascinating Confluence of Temporary Protected Status, Removal and Employment-Based Adjustment of Status” is at .

Rodrigo Tannus (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-tannus.cfm?c=CO) was included in Chambers Latin America, which quoted a client as saying that Mr. Tannus gives “concise, clear and direct“ advice and noted that Mr. Tannus focuses his practice on the immigration aspects of labor law.

Mr. Tannus was included in Legal 500 Latin America, which stated that “[r]eputable boutique Tannus & Asociados is highly specialized in immigration matters, assisting companies with establishing their presence in Colombia, and undertaking audits, due diligence, training and procedures before the various competent entities. Founding partner Rodrigo Tannus heads the team, which is currently assisting Red Clay and Wildlife Works with setting up their operations in the country.”

Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP is expanding its operation in the San Francisco Bay Area with the addition of new partner Farshad Owji, who will lead the San Francisco office, together with WR Partner Charina Garcia in Oakland. Mr. Owji will provide full-service visa and global relocation services. For more information, see https://wolfsdorf.com/blog/news_posts/wr-continues-to-grow-in-san-francisco-and-welcomes-farshad-owji-as-partner/

Stephen Yale-Loehr (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-loehr.cfm?c=US) was quoted by Newsweek in “CBP Accused of Acting ‘Above the Law’ After Forcing Iranian Student With Visa to Board Flight Back Home, Despite Emergency Stay.” Mr. Yale-Loehr said he was disturbed to hear not only about the Iranian student’s story but also of reports of dozens of Iranian Americans claiming to have been detained and questioned at a border crossing in Washington state recently. He said the incidents raised concerns that the United States might be “doomed to repeat past mistakes. For example, we now realize that interning U.S. citizens of Japanese descent during World War II was a mistake. Congress even passed a law in 1988 apologizing for the internments and making reparations. Similarly, detaining people of Muslim descent after the 9/11 terrorist attacks and making them go through special registration procedures failed to yield any significant results in finding and deterring other terrorists. As Benjamin Franklin once said: ‘Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” The article is at https://www.newsweek.com/cbp-facing-backlash-iranian-student-refused-entry-despite-visa-stay-removal-1483499. Mr. Yale-Loehr was also quoted on other topics by various media outlets:·         Los Angeles Times: ” ‘I have lost everything’: Iranian Students With Valid Visas Sent Home Upon Arrival at U.S. Airports”; https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2020-01-29/iranian-student-visas. Mr. Yale-Loehr said the difficulties that Iranian students currently face are part of a “disturbing trend we’ve seen before.” After Iranians stormed the U.S. Embassy in Tehran in 1979, he said, Iranian students in the United States had to register with immigration officials or risk deportation. More recently, he noted, the detention of “people of Muslim descent” after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks “failed to yield any significant results in finding and deterring other terrorists.”·         Law360: “Public Charge Order Sparks Confusion for Immigration Attorneys”; https://www.law360.com/health/articles/1238271/public-charge-order-sparks-confusion-for-immigration-attys. Unknowns have left attorneys to guess at the best course of action for clients who wish to sponsor family members for green cards, the article notes. “Nobody knows what to do. It’s very confusing. Everybody is scratching their head trying to figure out what to advise their clients, Mr. Yale-Loehr said. ·         Colorado Public Radio: “In Limbo For Years: U.S. Military Recruited Non-Citizens, But Hasn’t Allowed Them To Serve”; https://www.cpr.org/2020/01/29/in-limbo-for-years-us-military-recruited-non-citizens-but-hasnt-allowed-them-to-serve/. Hundreds of immigrants are fighting to be admitted into the U.S. armed forces, this article notes. The government recruited them into a program started in 2008 called Military Accessions Vital to the National Interest (MAVNI), which targeted noncitizens with skills the military needed, such as medical training or expertise in certain foreign languages. The administrationn has “effectively killed the MAVNI program by imposing all kinds of delays and arbitrary reasons for denial,” Mr. Yale-Loehr said, adding that he is mystified by how the larger group is being treated. “Given the tight labor market generally in the United States and the problems that the military is having in meeting its recruiting goals, foreign nationals are an important component to our military,” he noted.·         Times of India, re H-1B lawsuit: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/lawsuit-alleges-us-illegally-collected-350-million-in-visa-fees-from-tech-companies/articleshow/73686056.cms. Mr. Yale-Loehr said the lawsuit is important for two reasons: “First, it tries to force the USCIS to follow the plain language of the immigration law, and not effectively change the law by overly expansive interpretations. Second, the lawsuit is important because if the plaintiffs win, the USCIS could be forced to repay U.S. companies about $350 million in excess visa fees paid over the last six years.”·         Articles re Supreme Court allowing public charge rule to take effect:-       Associated Press: many outlets, including https://www.koaa.com/news/national-world-news/supreme-court-allows-enforcement-of-new-green-card-rule. “The public charge rule is the latest attack in the Trump administration’s war on immigrants,” Mr. Yale-Loehr said. “It makes it harder for working-class people to immigrate to or stay in the United States. This rule is another brick in the invisible wall this administration is building to curb legal immigration.”-       Univision: https://www.univision.com/noticias/politica/la-corte-suprema-permite-al-gobierno-aplicar-la-regla-de-carga-publica-que-facilita-negar-la-residencia-y-ciudadania–       Voice of America: https://www.voanoticias.com/a/corte-suprema-negar-tarjeta-verde-migrantes/5262465.html–       New York Daily News: https://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ny-immigrants-trump-benefits-supreme-court-20200127-zqbn3uro4vfyvllfadsqxwpsiu-story.html–       Newsday: https://www.newsday.com/long-island/politics/trump-bolton-book-witness-impeachment-scotus-immigration-benefits-netanyahu-1.41121631·         Detroit News, re Iranian student turned back in Detroit, Michigan: https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2020/01/27/iranian-student-msu-detained-sent-home/4593825002/. In addition to the student denials, earlier this month, many U.S. citizens of Iranian descent were questioned for hours trying to return from Canada, Mr. Yale-Loehr noted. “We seem doomed to repeat past mistakes. For example, we now realize that interning U.S. citizens of Japanese descent during World War II was a mistake. Congress even passed a law in 1988 apologizing for the internments and making reparations.”·         Lansing State Journal, re Iranian student turned back in Detroit: https://www.lansingstatejournal.com/story/news/2020/01/27/michigan-state-msu-student-faces-deportation-iran/4589759002/. Deporting or pressuring Iranian students to leave the United States is part of a trend in restricting travel from Iran, Mr. Yale-Loehr noted. He pointed to the 2017 travel ban limiting travel from Muslim-majority countries and the increasing tensions between United States and Iranian forces after the December assassination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani. “In the broader contexts, it’s just getting harder and harder to come to the United States from Iran,” he said. The Department of State thoroughly screens applicants’ backgrounds before issuing visas, a process that can take months, he noted. “Obviously there can be new facts that come to light between the time a person is issued a visa overseas and when they arrive in the United States that may justify [why] they may not be able to enter, but many times it seems to be antagonism toward Iranians that prompts [Customs] officials to go overboard to try to find excuses to prevent them from entering,” he said.

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2020-02-01 12:00:262023-10-16 14:30:47ABIL Global Update • February 2020

ABIL Global Update • December 2019

December 01, 2019/in Global Immigration Update /by ABIL

In this issue:

1. REMOTE WORKERS IN COLOMBIA: AN OVERVIEW – This article provides an overview of policies and procedures on remote workers in Colombia.

2. FRANCE – Twenty measures to “improve the immigration, asylum and integration policy” in France were presented by the government on November 6, 2019.

3. RUSSIA – This article provides an update on immigration-related developments in Russia.

4. UNITED KINGDOM – This article discusses Brexit-related practical tips for United Kingdom (UK) nationals traveling to the European Union (EU).

5. New Publications and Items of Interest – New Publications and Items of Interest

6. ABIL Member / Firm News – ABIL Member / Firm News

Download:

ABIL Global Immigration Update – December 2019


1. REMOTE WORKERS IN COLOMBIA: AN OVERVIEW

This article provides an overview of policies and procedures on remote workers in Colombia.

In Colombia, the immigration law stablishes that foreign individuals who work remotely and enter into a local agreement must apply for a visa, regardless of whether they enter Colombia physically.

Likewise and according to Decree 1067 of 2015, any natural or legal person who joins, employs, or admits a foreign individual through any modality, especially a labor, cooperative, or civil relationship that generates a profit, must demand a visa that allows the activity, occupation, or trade declared in the visa application.

Moreover, all foreigners who provide any type of service through local contracts must be registered in the platforms of Migration Colombia (SIRE) and the Ministry of Labor (RUTEC) to comply fully with the current immigration regulations. Additionally, they need to register their visas and issue the foreigners an ID card, which are processed in Colombia.

Back to Top


2. FRANCE

Twenty measures to “improve the immigration, asylum and integration policy” in France were presented by the government on November 6, 2019.

 

At the end of the interministerial committee on immigration and integration on November 6, 2019, the Prime Minister presented 20 measures to “improve [the] policy of immigration, asylum and integration” in France. Those that could affect professional immigration are summarized here.

One announced objective is the creation of a new statistical tool intended to reliably assess the reality of shortages in the French labor market. This tool will make it possible to define, each year, sector by sector, and in a territorialized way, a quantitative and qualitative assessment of skills needs. These quotas will be debated in Parliament and the list of skills in shortage will be revised annually. The inclusion of a job on this list waives job market tests when applying for a work permit.

The current list has not been updated since 2008, and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development estimates that today only 15% of skills listed there are truly in shortage.

It is also planned for “these quotas [to be] notified to the consular and prefectural authorities, to guide the visas and residence permits issuance policy.”

Simplification of Procedures

A simplification of the work permit issuance procedures has been announced, notably with the implementation in the summer of 2020 of a fast-track procedure for companies “enjoying recognition of the State under criteria related to their sector of activity and their organization (some companies justify a recurrent need for international mobility) and of course their practices respectful of labor law.”

Talent Passport and French Tech visa categories are also mentioned as “potentially subject to improvement and simplification.”

Dematerialization

The dematerialization of applications for “talent passports” and work permits is expected by early 2021.

There will be an improvement in the reception of applicants in Prefectures, with the implementation in a few months of “the first steps of a new service of online filing of residence permit applications.” The government press release states that “recourse to the temporary residence document called récépissé will no longer be necessary in almost all situations; convocations in prefecture will be fewer and processing time will be reduced.”

Deployment of this service will start with “student” residence permits in spring 2020, to become widespread by 2022.

Reduction of Taxes on Residence Permits

A proposition was made to adopt an amendment introducing a single basic fee, reduced from € 250 to € 200.

French Language Level for Naturalization

It is contemplated to raise the level of French language requirements for access to French nationality, from the current oral B1 level to the oral and written B1 level.

Details: https://www.karlwaheed.fr/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Government-announcement-on-immigration_141119.pdf

Back to Top


3. RUSSIA

This article provides an update on immigration-related developments in Russia.

New Regional Programs for Relocation of Compatriots Living Abroad

On November 12, 2019, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed an Order amending the government program of relocation of compatriots living abroad.

Starting January 1, 2020, Moscow, Moscow Region, Saint-Petersburg, and Sevastopol will have the right to develop their own local relocation programs provided there is a need for immigrants and conditions for settling them.

House Workers From Visa Countries—Order of the Ministry of Labor

Effective November 22, 2019, the Ministry of Labor is allowing individuals to apply for quotas for engaging foreign labor. Now, having received a quota for foreign labor, individuals will be able to employ foreign workers from visa countries as house workers, such as babysitters, tutors, house assistants, drivers, gardeners, and cooks.

It is not entirely clear if this attempt to legalize this part of the labor market will be successful. It is suggested that to receive a quota and then a work permit for a foreign national, individuals will have to undergo the same procedures as companies when they engage foreign labor on the basis of quota and corporate work permission.

Tajikistan: Agreement on Organized Recruitment of Tajikistan Citizens for Work in Russia is Filed for Ratification by the State Duma

The Russian government has signed an agreement with the government of Tajikistan on organized recruitment of citizens of Tajikistan for temporary work in Russia. The agreement was filed for ratification by the Russian State Duma. Once the ratification procedure is completed, the agreement will come into force and be applied.

Russian Citizenship—Regulations on Review of Citizenship Applications Has Been Approved

On November 23, 2019, regulations on the review of citizenship issues by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and its regional offices came into force.

The renewal of these regulations seems to be an expected and logical step because, until now, authorities used the old regulations, which were not reviewed since the citizenship issues were transferred back to the Ministry of Internal Affairs from the Federal Migration Service office. This year has seen many amendments of legislation governing the procedures for acquiring citizenship.

Thus, the regulations describe actions of Ministry of Internal Affairs officials while reviewing citizenship applications, applications for renunciation of citizenship, applications for citizenship filed in simplified procedures, and restoration of citizenship. The regulations also contain new forms of documents used by Ministry of Internal Affairs officials, although application forms, as well as lists of documents, which applicants file to the Ministry of Internal Affairs are still approved by Presidential Order 14.11.2002 N 1325, “Regulations on the procedure for review of citizenship applications” (with amendments).

Antigua and Barbuda: Agreement on Visa-Free Travel Came Into Force

On October 22, 2019, an agreement between the government of the Russian Federation and the government of Antigua and Barbuda on visa-free travel came into force.

In accordance with the agreement, citizens of both countries will be able to enter the territory of the other country and stay there up to 90 calendar days without a visa. The allowed period of stay should not exceed 90 days out of each 180 days, starting on the date of first entry.

If citizens of either country intend to stay longer than 90 days and/or perform labor or commercial activities, they must apply for the appropriate visa according to the legislation of the respective country.

Address Registration—New Regulations

On October, 28 2019, new regulations came into force that outline the rules for address registration for foreign citizens and stateless persons, as well as new notification forms:

  • Notification form for a foreign citizen registering at their place of residence
  • Notification form for a foreign citizen registering at their place of stay
  • Form of stamp confirming registration of a foreign citizen at their place of stay
  • Form of stamp confirming de-registration of a foreign citizen
  • Form of stamp confirming the fact that the inviting party has completed the necessary actions to register the address of a foreign citizen

The new regulations contain details on the procedures for informing the public about the procedure itself, timelines, and lists of required documents necessary for submission by applicants.

Document submission options:

  • In person to the responsible office of the Internal Affairs Ministry
  • In person to the multi-functional government center
  • Through Russian Post

Timelines:

  • Registration—on the spot (provided all necessary documents are filed)
  • De-registration—within 3 business days (of filing of all necessary documents)

Russian Citizenship—Bill Under Review

On October 21, 2019, the Russian government submitted to the State a bill providing for the following changes:

  • Ukrainian and Belorussian citizens who speak Russian fluently will not have to pass an interview before the special commission, provided:
  • They apply in person to the commission to be considered as Russian native speakers, and
  • They themselves or their relatives or their direct ascending relatives permanently live or lived previously in the territory of the Russian Federation or in the territory of the former Russian Empire or USSR within the former borders of the Russian Federation
  • Regulations governing the work of language commissions conducting interviews on the recognition of foreign citizens as Russian native speakers will be unified and approved at the federal level. In particular, unified criteria on language knowledge will be introduced, and rules on issuance, usage, and storage of control materials used by the language commissions will be specified, as well as requirements to the rules for security in relation to storage of personal information and regulations on the procedures for publishing of such data on the Internet. Such unified regulations will be issued by the Internal Affairs Ministry in close cooperation with the Ministry of Education.

Address Registration—Bill Under Review

On October 21, 2019, the Russian government submitted a bill to the State Duma that would:

  • Give right to all foreign citizens who own property in Russia to register under the address of such property themselves as well as their family members (spouse, children (including adopted), children’s spouses, parents (including adoptive), parents’ spouses, grandparents, and grandchildren). At the moment only highly qualified specialists as well as foreign citizens who have permanent residence permits have such rights.
  • The inviting party will be able to send an address registration notification through the government internet portal, Gosuslugi.ru. If a registration notification is sent through Gosuslugi, it will be considered submitted in e-form. When a notification is filed in e-form, after receiving confirmation of address registration completion in e-form, verified by the qualified e-signature of the responsible official, the inviting party will have to print out the confirmation and give it to the foreign citizen who was registered.
  • Give equal rights in terms of address registration at the place of stay to foreign citizens who have temporary and permanent residence permits. Both categories of foreign citizens will have to register address within 7 business days from the date of arrival to the new address.
  • In cases when a residence accommodation or other property, supplied to the foreign citizen as a place for stay, belongs as property to a:
  1. Russian citizen;
  2. Foreign citizen;
  3. Foreign company; or
  4. Foreign organization

who reside/have place of registration/business outside of Russia, the responsibilities of the inviting party will have to be performed by the representative of such owner (confirmed by a power of attorney).

Currently, there are a lot of problems with completion of address registration procedures for foreign citizens who signed a lease with Russian citizens and who permanently live abroad. Hopefully, with this amendment coming into force, this issue will go away.

Far Eastern Federal District (FEFD) and Free Port Vladivostok—Bill Under Review

For foreign citizens entering the Russian Federation with the purpose of conduct negotiations regarding signing of investment agreements with the residents of special innovative socio-economic development zones in FEFD and free port Vladivostok, the Russian government has prepared a bill that would:

  • Extend the validity of the ordinary business visa—it will be issued as multiple entry and for a term of up to 1 year, and in the case of an investment agreement will be signed for a term of up to 3 years;
  • Extend the validity of the ordinary work visa for up to 3 years for those who signed a labor agreement connected with execution of the investment project;
  • Reduce the visa processing time at Russian consulates abroad to 5 days; and
  • Introduce a new requirement for employers to notify the Internal Affairs Ministry not only about the dismissal of the foreign national, but also about termination of the investment agreement, for realization of which the foreign national has been invited (due to the fact that termination of the investment agreement will be the basis for shortening the foreigner’s period of stay).

This bill introduces a new category of foreign workers—workers of special innovative socio-economic development zones in FEFD and free port Vladivostok, who are hired in realization of an investment agreement.

Botswana—Agreement on Visa-Free Travel Came Into Force

On October 8, 2019, an agreement came into force between the governments of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Botswana on visa-free travel. According to the agreement, citizens of either country will be able to enter the other country and stay there for up to 30 days without a visa, the total limit of stay being 90 days out of each 180 days.

Citizens of both countries who intend to stay longer than 30 days and\or perform work activities, study, or permanently live, must apply for the appropriate visa according to the legislation of the country of entry.

Saudi Arabia—Memorandum on Simplification of Visa Requirements

On October 12, 2019, the Russian government approved the signing of a memorandum with the government of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia on simplification of visa requirements for citizens of both countries. The memorandum provides for the introduction of the following types of visas for the citizens of both countries:

  • Multiple tourist visas for up to 6 months
  • Multiple private visas for up to 1 year
  • Multiple business visas for up to 5 years
  • Multiple humanitarian visas for up to 5 years

Stay limitations for all of the above-mentioned visa categories are 90 days out of each 180 days.

Visa processing at the consulates of both countries takes 1 to 3 business days.

The memorandum does not cover the following visa categories:

  • Work
  • Student
  • Permanent stay
  • Religious pilgrimage

Entry into force is within 60 days after the date of receipt of the last notification of completion of the in-country procedures necessary for the document coming into force.

Russian Citizenship via Simplified Procedure—Bill Under Review

The Russian government has approved a bill that shortens the processing time for citizenship applications filed via simplified procedure. Specifically, the bill provides for the amendment of the following procedures:

  • Decisions on granting citizenship and on exit from Russian citizenship in relation to applicants residing in Russia, as well as participants of the State program for relocation of compatriots living abroad, as well as other applicants, filing for citizenship via simplified procedures—within 3 months (instead of 6 months);
  • Decisions on granting citizenship and on exit from Russian citizenship in relation to applicants residing outside of Russia and filing for citizenship via simplified procedures—within 6 months;
  • Reviewing of application for citizenship and decision on such application—within 3 months (instead of 6 months) from the date of filing.

Government Plans: No need to Renounce Foreign Citizenship to Acquire Russian Citizenship

According to the Ministry for Economic Development initiative, approved by the Russian government, the government plans to give the right to foreign citizens to acquire Russian citizenship without having to renounce citizenship they have.

Currently, there are several exceptions to this requirement:

  • Agreement between Russia and a foreign country
  • Law of the foreign country that a person cannot renounce citizenship of this country
  • Several categories of foreign citizens applying for Russian citizenship via simplified procedure

This initiative is under discussion.

Additional Immunization Campaign Against Measles

Under an Order signed in March 2019 by the Chief State Sanitary Doctor, employers engaging foreign labor until December 31, 2019, must make sure that all foreign citizens they employ are immunized against measles or had this infection in the past or were previously immunized in a proper manner.

Back to Top


4. UNITED KINGDOM

This article discusses Brexit-related practical tips for United Kingdom (UK) nationals traveling to the European Union (EU).

The issues that UK national employees who travel to the EU as business visitors after a no-deal outcome will need to consider are:

  • Check passport validity and if necessary renew: UK nationals will be treated as third-country (non-EU) nationals and will need to have a minimum of 6 months’ validity left on their passport from the date of arrival in Schengen countries in order to be permitted entry.
  • Be aware of the maximum amount of time allowed in the Schengen area: UK nationals traveling for business (meetings, attending conferences) would not need a visa for short stays in the Schengen area but should be mindful that they will only be allowed to stay for up to 90 days in any 180-day period.
  • Keep track of days in the Schengen area for frequent travelers: Permitted time in the Schengen area from after the date of exit can be worked out using a calculator, such as https://ec.europa.eu/assets/home/visa-calculator/calculator.htm?lang=en. While intended to be used by non-EU nationals, it should be applicable to UK nationals in the event of no deal.
  • Check whether the employee’s proposed business activity is permitted: What business visitors are allowed to do can vary across the EU countries, so care should be taken to follow the relevant local rules. In some cases, work permits may be required.
  • Expect greater delays when traveling: UK nationals would not have an ongoing right to use the separate lanes provided for EU nationals.
  • Carry additional documents: When traveling to the EU, UK nationals may be asked to confirm they have:
    • Sufficient funds available for the duration of their stay
    • A return or onward ticket
    • Proof of accommodation
    • Health insurance

HR teams should communicate these key tips to their staff. See https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/news/uk-nationals-going-to-the-eu-for-business-travel-in-the-event-of-no-deal.

A one-page guide for EU citizens in the UK is at . A one-page guide for UK citizens in the EU is at .

Back to Top


5. New Publications and Items of Interest

Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers:

The latest immigration news is at https://www.abil.com/news.cfm. ·

The latest published media releases include:

  • ABIL Says Proposed Change to Public Charge Rule Would Exclude Immigrants from Government Programs: https://www.prweb.com/releases/abil_says_proposed_change_to_public_charge_rule_would_exclude_immigrants_from_government_programs/prweb15737932.htm
  • New Data Show Increase in H-1B Denials and RFEs: https://www.prweb.com/releases/new_data_show_increase_in_h_1b_denials_and_rfes/prweb15673632.htm
  • ABIL Urges Administration to Change “Buy American and Hire American” Executive Order: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2018/05/prweb15485457.htm
  • ABIL Member Kuck Baxter Immigration Commercial Nominated for an Emmy: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2018/05/prweb15485460.htm

–   ABIL Members Note Immigration Threats for Employers in 2018: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2018/03/prweb15261255.htm

  • ABIL is available on Twitter: @ABILImmigration.
  • Recent ABIL member blogs are at http://www.abilblog.com/.

Back to Top


6. ABIL Member / Firm News

Klasko Immigration Law Partners, LLP, welcomed its newest Associate attorney, Jordan J. Gonzalez, to its team. Jordan Gonzalez provides exceptional immigration law services to a diverse set of corporate and individual clients. Prior to joining Klasko Immigration Law Partners, Jordan practiced at a boutique immigration law firm that provided legal advice to corporate clients, including applications for H-2A/B, H-1B, TN, L-1, O-1, J-1, labor certifications, multinational manager and executive immigrant petitions, and national interest waivers, as well as I-9 and LCA compliance. The full press release is at http://www.visalaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2019.11-Press-Release-KILP-Welcomes-New-Associate-Jordan-J.-Gonzalez-4812-7054-1739-v.1.pdf.H. Ronald Klasko (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-klasko.cfm) was named to the Philadelphia Business Journal’s third annual Best of the Bar top lawyers list.William Stock (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-stock.cfm?c=US), of Klasko Immigration Law Partners, LLP,  was quoted by The Miami Herald in “To Get a Visa or Green Card You Need the Right Lawyer. Here Are Ways to Keep the Cost Down.” Mr. Stock listed questions an immigrant should ask an immigration attorney before deciding whether to hire him or her. “First and foremost, an individual has to feel comfortable with the lawyer and with the relationship you are going to have with the lawyer, because you are going to trust and rely on this person. It’s very important for people to understand they are hiring the lawyer, the lawyer works for them, they are the boss, and if they are not happy with the service, they should tell the lawyer, and they are entitled to work with the lawyer.” The article is at https://amp.miamiherald.com/news/local/immigration/article235303862.html. Charles Kuck (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-kuck.cfm?c=US) posted the latest edition of The Immigration Hour podcast. This week’s edition discusses the importance of the DACA program and features an interview with a DACA recipient who shares how her life has changed as a result of the program. The full podcast is at https://soundcloud.com/user-474250731/what-daca-means-to-america.Mr. Kuck was quoted by Law360 in “Dems’ Fix For Green Card Backlog May Mean No Fix At All.” Mr. Kuck provided his critical opinion on the proposed S. 2603 Relief Act Bill: “It has engendered a lot of disagreement within the bar, and that is unusual, but it shows you one of the reasons that 386 is bad. Basically, you’re robbing Peter to pay Paul.” The article is at https://www.law360.com/articles/1210277/dems-fix-for-green-card-backlog-may-mean-no-fix-at-all. Robert F. Loughran (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-loughran.cfm) recently presented U.S. employment-based immigration considerations and strategies to a group of investors and entrepreneurs from Mexico at a seminar hosted by the San Antonio Economic Development Foundation.Mr. Loughran was interviewed for an article,“Renouncing U.S. Citizenship: A Comprehensive Guide,” in the November 2019 edition of Sovereign Man’s premium publication, “SovereignMan: Confidential.”

Marco Mazzeschi (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-mazzeschi.cfm?c=IT) and Yuu Shibata contributed a chapter to The Charter and the Court of Justice of the European Union: Notable Cases from 2016-2018, published by Wolf Legal Publishers. Their chapter is entitled, “X and X v État Belge: a Dead End for a Humanitarian Visa in the EU?” The book contains annotated judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union from the period 2016-2018, with comments on landmark cases in which the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union was central to the dictum of the Court of Justice of the European Union. See https://www.mazzeschi.it/news/mazzeschi-contributes-to-《the-charter-and-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union》/.

Cyrus Mehta (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-mehta.cfm) has authored a new blog entry. “How the Founding Values of Two Great Nations—United States and India—Can Get Hollowed Out Through Tweaks in their Immigration Laws” is at http://blog.cyrusmehta.com/2019/12/how-the-founding-values-of-two-great-nations-united-states-and-india-can-get-hollowed-out-through-tweaks-in-their-immigration-laws.html?fbclid=IwAR3_NKCBhy9HGMQJohxzu9eNKZW5HUdBmO7PfWJ8aNUCrHclpPU4dSNGgHo.

Mr. Mehta was quoted by The Times of India in “Uncertainty Rises for Spouses of H-1B Visa Holders.” Mr. Mehta stated, “The Court of Appeals’ order has given Save Jobs USA the standing to challenge the EAD rule. The decision does not impact the H-4 EAD rule.” The full article is at https://m.timesofindia.com/india/job-uncertainty-rises-for-spouses-of-h-1b-visa-holders/amp_articleshow/71999514.cms.Mr. Mehta was quoted by IndiaWest in “In Long-Awaited Decision, DC Circuit Court Finds American Workers Unfairly Impacted by H-4 Work Authorization.” Mr. Mehta tweeted, “It’s a rather crude way of affirming plaintiffs standing by a circuit court – if you allow H-4s to work, more H-1Bs will stay and thus compete with American workers.” The full article is at https://www.indiawest.com/news/global_indian/in-long-awaited-decision-dc-circuit-court-finds-american-workers/article_b958fea2-0583-11ea-9afc-c7aab4df221f.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=user-share.Mr. Mehta has authored several new blog posts. “Filing an EB-1 as a Multinational Manager After the Approval of an EB-2 for a Backlogged Indian Beneficiary” is at http://blog.cyrusmehta.com/2019/11/filing-an-eb-1-as-a-multinational-manager-after-the-approval-of-an-eb-2-for-a-backlogged-indian-beneficiary.html. “Court Shoots Down Embarrassing Leaps by USCIS to Justify an H-1B Denial” is at http://blog.cyrusmehta.com/2019/11/court-shoots-down-embarrassing-leaps-by-uscis-to-justify-an-h-1b-denial.html. “Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Constitutionality of Smuggling Statute That Could Impact Immigration Lawyers” is at http://blog.cyrusmehta.com/2019/10/supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-constitutionality-of-smuggling-statute-that-could-impact-immigration-lawyers.html. “Denial of H-1B Cases: The Occupational Outlook Handbook is Not the Holy Grail” is at http://blog.cyrusmehta.com/2019/10/denial-of-h-1b-cases-the-occupational-outlook-handbook-is-not-the-holy-grail.html. Mr. Mehta was quoted by Law360 in “Dems’ Fix For Green Card Backlog May Mean No Fix At All.” Mr. Mehta acknowledged that while the bill is “obviously not perfect,” he views S. 2603 as a better alternative to nothing, “[if] we can get something now, take it, and then keep on fighting.” The article is at https://www.law360.com/articles/1210277/dems-fix-for-green-card-backlog-may-mean-no-fix-at-all. David Isaacson, of Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners PLLC, authored a new blog post, “Residence in the Twilight Zone: Are USCIS and the State Department Trying to Encourage Some U.S. Citizen Parents to Get Divorced?” The blog post is at http://blog.cyrusmehta.com/2019/10/residence-in-the-twilight-zone-are-uscis-and-the-state-department-trying-to-encourage-some-u-s-citizen-parents-to-get-divorced.html.

Cora-Ann Pestaina, of Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners PLLC, has authored a new blog post. “Court Shoots Down Embarrassing Leaps By USCIS to Justify an H-1B Denial” is at http://blog.cyrusmehta.com/2019/11/court-shoots-down-embarrassing-leaps-by-uscis-to-justify-an-h-1b-denial.html.

Greg Siskind, of Siskind Susser PC, was quoted by Bloomberg Law in “Immigration Not Top Priority for Scalia at Labor Department.” Mr. Siskind provided his perspective on the recently appointed head of the Department of Labor, Eugene Scalia, stating, “He’s been a labor lawyer for large companies, exactly the kind of guy you’d want to get in there.” The article is at https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/immigration-not-top-priority-for-scalia-at-labor-department.

Stephen Yale-Loehr (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-loehr.cfm?c=US) was quoted in recent media:

·         Univision (in Spanish), “Corte falla a favor de nueva regla de carga pública, pero seguirá en suspenso por demandas pendientes”: Mr. Yale-Loehr said [translated] that if a new public charge rule, which is the subject of pending lawsuits, takes effect, it “will dramatically increase the number of immigrants who may be considered ineligible for the green card depending on the use of certain government services, household income and other criteria. Under current policy, foreign citizens who use non-monetary benefits such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and Medicaid were not considered public charges. But the new rule changes the concept to include those and other non-monetary benefit programs.” The article is at https://www.univision.com/noticias/inmigracion/corte-falla-a-favor-de-nueva-regla-de-carga-publica-pero-seguira-en-suspenso-por-demandas-pendientes. ·         Davis Enterprise, “Union petitions UC to support Iranian students”: Commenting on Iranian students being prevented from boarding flights, Mr. Yale-Loehr said, “I can only speculate that the reason may have more to do with the deteriorating state of U.S.-Iran relations than with anything in the students’ backgrounds.” The article is at https://www.davisenterprise.com/local-news/union-petitions-uc-to-support-iranian-students/. ·         Truthout, “Trump Has Built a Bureaucratic Wall to Keep Out Immigrants He Says He Wants”: “They’re claiming that they want to go toward merit-based immigration, but it doesn’t seem that they’re actually trying to welcome more high-skilled foreign nationals to work in the United States. We see an assault on legal immigration just as vociferously as we’ve seen the assault on illegal immigration. It’s really Make America White Again.” The article is at https://truthout.org/articles/trump-has-built-a-bureaucratic-wall-to-keep-out-immigrants-he-says-he-wants/.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by The Cornell Chronicle in “Aided by Cornell Legal Clinic, Ghana Native Rebuilding Life in US.” Mr. Yale Loehr stated, “It’s a stacked deck against an asylum seeker, particularly if they don’t have an attorney to represent them. We’re glad that our clinic here at Cornell Law School can represent at least a few people each year, but it’s like putting your finger in a dike.” The full article is at http://news.cornell.edu/stories/2019/11/aided-cornell-legal-clinic-ghana-native-rebuilding-life-us.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by The East Bay Times in “Green Cards: Company in $50 Million Settlement Promises to Pay Back Would-Be Immigrant Investors, But Some Remain Unsatisfied.” Mr. Yale Loehr stated that while many of the 10,000 EB-5 visas go to family members of investors, thousands of investors provide a minimum of $500,000 to help U.S. companies. “That’s a lot of money that helps, or at least can help, stimulate the U.S. economy and create jobs for U.S. workers, but it is complex and it has to be done well.” The full article is at https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2019/11/08/green-cards-company-in-50-million-settlement-promises-to-pay-back-investors-but-some-remain-unsatisfied/.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by The Houston Chronicle in “Trump’s Decision to End DACA Faces Supreme Court Scrutiny.” Mr. Yale-Loehr provided his perspective on how he foresees the Supreme Court vote resulting in a 5-4 decision with Justice Roberts as the swing vote. “The Supreme Court has traditionally given the president wide latitude on immigration policy decisions, but they could try to avoid the thorny constitutional issues by ruling on narrower statutory grounds.” The full article is at https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Trump-s-decision-to-end-DACA-faces-Supreme-14827072.php.

Mr. Yale-Loehr (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-loehr.cfm?c=US) was quoted by The New York Times in “Trump Will Deny Immigrant Visas to Those Who Can’t Pay for Health Care.”Mr. Yale-Loehr commented on the ramifications of the Trump administration’s executive order denying visas to individuals without healthcare: “Thousands of people annually would be denied green cards if the executive order takes effect. President Trump has failed to build a physical wall along the U.S.-Mexico border to deter illegal immigrants, but he has effectively built an invisible wall to keep out legal immigrants.” The article is at https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/04/us/immigrant-visas-health-care.html.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by The New York Times in “Judges Strike Several Blows to Trump Immigration Policies.”Mr. Yale-Loehr stated in the article, “The court rulings today represent at least a temporary setback in the Trump administration’s attacks on both legal and illegal immigrants. Ultimately, I predict these issues will go all the way to the Supreme Court.” The full article is at https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/11/us/immigration-public-charge-injunction.html.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by The Guardian in “Iranian Students Barred From U.S.: Lost Money, Broken Dreams, No Answers.”Mr. Yale-Loehr put forth his thoughts on the possible political motivation for the barring of the Iranian-born students: “I can only speculate that the reason may have more to do with the deteriorating state of U.S.-Iran relations than with anything in the students’ backgrounds.” The full article is at https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/oct/14/iranian-students-barred-from-us-lost-money-broken-dreams-no-answers.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by CNN in “Supreme Court Wrestles With Immigration-Related Case as Sotomayor Breaks the New 2-Minute Rule.”Mr. Yale-Loehr argued that a ruling in favor of immigration control in Kansas could provide precedent to other states to follow suit: “What’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. If the Supreme Court rules that [the] federal government no longer [has] sole responsibility for regulating immigration, lower courts may uphold pro-immigrant or sanctuary or non-cooperation polices enacted by states and localities.” The article is at https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/16/politics/supreme-court-immigration-sotomayor/index.html.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Univision in “Es ‘una desviación innecesaria’: juez federal bloquea la entrada en vigor de nueva regla de carga pública.” The full article is at https://www.univision.com/noticias/inmigracion/es-una-desviacion-innecesaria-juez-federal-bloquea-la-entrada-en-vigor-de-nueva-regla-de-carga-publica.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by The Real Deal in “EB-5 Investors Rush In Ahead of Looming Rules Change.”Mr. Yale-Loehr stated that most of the existing EB-5 investments nationwide are at the $500,000 level. But after next month’s deadline, fewer than half of all EB-5 projects will be allowed at that threshold. The full article is at https://therealdeal.com/national/2019/10/21/eb-5-investors-rush-in-ahead-of-looming-rules-change/.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Univision in an article about the increasing number of deportations. He said, “While the government certainly has the right to deport people with legitimate orders of final deportation, many of those orders may be subject to challenge. Immigrants have rights.” The full article is at https://www.univision.com/noticias/inmigracion/una-orden-de-deportacion-no-significa-que-las-opciones-se-acabaron-te-explicamos-por-que.

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2019-12-01 11:41:352023-10-16 14:30:55ABIL Global Update • December 2019

ABIL Global Update • October 2019

October 01, 2019/in Global Immigration Update /by ABIL

In this issue:

1. BREXIT NO-DEAL CONTINGENCY PLANS: AN OVERVIEW – This article provides an overview of contingency plans in several countries in the event of a possible “no-deal Brexit.”

2. ITALY -The new government proposes changes to the citizenship law.

3. RUSSIA -This article provides an update on immigration-related legislative developments in Russia

4. UNITED KINGDOM -The UK government has announced some helpful autumn rule changes for Tier 2.

5. New Publications and Items of Interest -New Publications and Items of Interest

6. ABIL Member / Firm News -ABIL Member / Firm News

Download:

ABIL Global Immigration Update – October 2019


1. BREXIT NO-DEAL CONTINGENCY PLANS: AN OVERVIEW

This article provides an overview of contingency plans in several countries in the event of a possible “no-deal Brexit.”

Belgium

The federal Belgian authorities have prepared emergency legislation for a no-deal Brexit.

An Act dated April 3, 2019 (hereafter “the Brexit Act”) regulates the right to reside in Belgium for United Kingdom (UK) citizens and their family members between, in principle, the withdrawal date and December 31, 2020. Apart from one section regarding economy/insurance, the Brexit Act, and thus also its immigration rules, will take effect on the date confirmed by Royal Decree. This date will, logically speaking, be the withdrawal date in the event of a no-deal Brexit. The Brexit Act immigration rules will cease to be applicable on December 31, 2020, or an earlier date confirmed by Royal Decree.

The Belgian government has not yet issued a Royal Decree to confirm the date on which the Brexit Act will take effect. They await the outcome of the pending Brexit discussions.

The Brexit Act immigration rules can be annulled, amended, completed, or replaced by a Royal Decree. They can, in principle, be summarized as follows:

  • UK citizens and their family members who hold a right to reside in Belgium before the withdrawal date maintain this right after the withdrawal date. Residence permits expiring between the withdrawal date and, in principle, December 31, 2020, will be extended until, in principle, December 31, 2020;
  • UK citizens and their family members who do not yet have a Belgian residence permit should apply for a residence permit prior to the withdrawal date. Applications that are still pending on the withdrawal date will be processed under the pre-Brexit rules;
  • Applications for residence permits filed after the withdrawal date will be processed according to the rules for third-country nationals, unless these applications are filed by family members of UK citizens, who are eligible to reside under the above-mentioned rules (they hold a right to reside on the withdrawal date or they have filed a residence permit application before the withdrawal date).

The Belgian government has also prepared Royal Decrees granting the right to work to UK citizens who reside in Belgium on the withdrawal date and who can continue to reside in Belgium after Brexit pursuant to the Brexit Act, until, in principle, December 31, 2020. This legislation has not yet been approved.

For UK citizens not protected by the Brexit Act, all three regions (Flanders, Brussels, and Wallonia) have implemented a three-month work permit (for employees)/professional card (for self-employed) exemption during the transition period, i.e., between the withdrawal date and December 31, 2020.

The Flanders region has issued a no-deal Brexit decree, dated March 22, 2019. This decree holds that “a provision…exempts UK nationals who wish to pursue economic activities on the territory of the Flemish Region after Brexit from a work permit or professional card during the transition period, provided their performance is limited to a maximum of ninety days. If their performance exceeds the maximum of ninety days, UK nationals will have to request a work permit or professional card, according to the procedure for third country nationals. However, an accelerated procedure will then be provided.”

A similar provision is included in a decree for the Walloon region, dated April 4, 2019: during the transition period (this means until December 31, 2020), UK nationals can work as an employee or self-employed without a work permit or professional card, provided their work in the Walloon region does not exceed 90 days.

A similar short-term exemption during the transition period in a no-deal scenario has been implemented by a decree for the Brussels region, dated March 28, 2019. The text states that the exemption can be invoked “for a term of maximally 90 days, starting at the latest on 31 December 2020, in any 180-day period…provided a reciprocity measure exists.”

Italy

With decree 25 March 2019, n. 22, the Italian government has outlined the measures that will apply if the United Kingdom (UK) leaves the European Union (EU) without a deal. In particular, article 14 refers to the residency rights of British nationals and their non-EU family members living in Italy, and article 15 refers to Italian citizenship applications. The legislative measures taken by the Italian government ensure that UK nationals legally resident in Italy at the time of Brexit will have the right, and sufficient time, to obtain long-term resident status under EU Directive 2003/109.

Details: See https://www.mazzeschi.it/category/british-citizens-rights-in-italy-after-brexit/; https://www.mazzeschi.it/eventi/brexit-immigration-podcast-a-view-from-italy/.

United Kingdom

On the same day the House of Commons voted to try and rule out the possibility of a no-deal Brexit, the Home Office released on September 5, 2019, an updated policy paper on no-deal immigration arrangements for EU citizens arriving after Brexit, currently scheduled for October 31, 2019.

In a no-deal scenario, EU citizens resident in the UK before that date are expected to be able to continue to reside in the UK and apply under the EU Settlement Scheme. On that basis, practitioners are advising that when possible EU citizens wishing to reside in the UK seek to arrive in the UK before October 31, 2019.

There has been ongoing uncertainty. For example, since August 19, 2019, when Home Secretary Priti Patel announced that there would effectively be an end to free movement after October 31, 2019, there has been concern in relation to what will happen to EU citizens who arrive in the UK for the first time after October 31, 2019, if there is a no-deal Brexit.

Details: Alert on Brexit, https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/news/no-deal-brexit-policy-update-provides-some-relief-for-employers-and-eu-citizens; UK policy paper,

Back to Top


2. ITALY

The new government proposes changes to the citizenship law.

The Italian government is proposing a bill to introduce significant changes
to current Italian Citizenship law (Law 91 of 1992) with regard to the
citizenship acquisition process for children.

If the bill is approved, citizenship could be adjudicated for: (i) foreign
children born in Italy who have at least one parent holding a European
Union permit for long-term residents; (ii) children who immigrated to Italy
before the age of 12 and have spent at least five years in the country’s
education system. Additionally, a minor child who acquires or reacquires
Italian citizenship will become an Italian national even if not living with
the parents.

The draft law was discussed by the Parliament in early October.

Back to Top


3. RUSSIA

This article provides an update on immigration-related legislative developments in Russia.

Starting October 1, 2019, Invitation Letters To Be Issued in E-Form Only

According to the Internal Affairs Ministry Moscow immigration office, starting October 1, 2019, all invitation letters for foreign citizens and stateless persons will be issued in Moscow in e-form only. Additionally, payment certificates must be filed immediately along with the application package.

Corrections will be made only in case of a mistake made by Internal Affairs Ministry officials and only if the mistakes are in the spelling of a foreign citizen’s name or in the place of birth. Such corrections will take approximately 1-2 business days. A corrected invitation letter will be also sent to the appropriate consulate. Corrections will not be made in the date of intended entry and exit or the place of the visa application—Russian consulate abroad.

A foreign citizen can apply for a visa on the basis of the invitation letter, issued in e-form only to the consulate, as mentioned in the application for the invitation letter.

E-Visas: List of Countries Whose Citizens Can Use E-Visas to Enter Russia Through Border Posts in St. Petersburg and Leningradskaya Region Approved

The list of countries whose citizens can use e-visas to enter Russia through border posts in St. Petersburg and the Leningradskaya region has been approved.

The following types of visas will be issued in e-form:

  • One-entry ordinary business
  • Tourist
  • Humanitarian

There are 53 countries on the list.

At the moment there is no information regarding through which border control posts entry with e-visas will be possible in St. Petersburg and the Leningradskaya region.

New Out of Quota Positions List

The Ministry of Labor and Social Development has approved a new list of job positions for qualified foreign specialists, who can be employed for up to one year without a quota.

The new list consists of 80 positions and is effective as of September 8, 2019.

Positions excluded from the list:

  • Quality engineer
  • Manager (in public nutrition and hotel service)
  • Head waiter (administrator of the shop floor)
  • Technical literature translator
  • Chef-cook

Positions added to the list:

  • Dispatcher
  • Regime planning engineer
  • Engineer-programmer
  • Repair of the technological equipment master
  • Technological installations operator
  • Fitter for the repair of technological installations
  • Electrician for the repair and maintenance of electrical equipment

The list still contains various managerial positions, as well as engineering and creative professions.

New Highly Qualified Specialist (HQS) Application Form, Notifications on Foreign Citizens Performing Labor Activities in Russia

On August 29, 2019, an Order of the Internal Affairs Ministry was published, effective September 9, 2019, which approves new:

  1. Application form and regulations for the HQS work permit process. This application form is submitted personally by the foreign citizen.

The application form for an HQS work permit by the employer has not changed;

  1. Notification form and regulations regarding employment of a foreign citizen, submitted by an organization rendering job search and employment services to foreign nationals in Russia;
  2. Notification form and regulations regarding salary payments to HQS;
  3. In relation to foreign citizens who are studying full-time in college or university in Russia:
  • Notification form on signing of a labor or civil agreement;
  • Notification form on termination of a labor or civil agreement;
  • Notification form regarding granting of unpaid leave for more than one month within one calendar year;
  • Regulations for filing of the above-mentioned notifications by employers and customers;
  1. Notification form regarding completion or termination of studies by a foreign citizen who is performing work activities in Russia and studies in Russia full-time, as well as regulations for filing by the educational organization;
  2. Notification form regarding signing of a labor agreement with a foreign national;
  3. Notification form regarding termination of a labor agreement with a foreign national; and
  4. Regulations on filing notifications regarding signing and termination of labor agreements with foreign nationals.

There have been slight changes in these notification forms, and abbreviations and reductions are no longer acceptable on the forms (except official ones).

In relation to this, because the form fields may be insufficient, additional pages are included where employers must enter data for which there was not enough space on the form itself.

Additional pages are completed when necessary. On the additional page, it is necessary to state the number and name of the field in the form for which information is being added, as well as the full name of the foreign citizen for whom the notification is filed.

Notifications and additional pages, which may consist of two or more pages, must be attached together and numbered, and on the last page of the notification an additional page certification record must be made.

Notification Regarding Termination of Foreign Citizenship or Right for Permanent Stay in a Foreign Country (for Russian Citizens)

On October 17, 2019, amendments to the Federal Law from 31.05.2002, N 62-FL “on Russian citizenship” come into force. These amendments concern Russian citizens who have citizenship from a foreign country or a document granting the right of permanent stay in a foreign country.

Previously there was a legally established duty to file a notification in the territorial department of the Internal Affairs Ministry regarding receipt of foreign citizenship or permanent residence in a foreign country or other document granting the right to a Russian citizen of permanent stay in a foreign country.

Starting October 17, 2019, if foreign citizenship or the right of permanent stay in a foreign country have been terminated, the Russian citizen has the right to file a written notification regarding this. The amendments give the right (but do not establish a duty) to the Russian citizen to file such a notification. Written notification is filed by the Russian citizen (or their legal representative) in the territorial department of the Internal Affairs Ministry depending on their permanent or temporary residence address within Russia.

Project: Increasing Use of Electronic Visas

The Russian government has filed a bill of the Federal Law to the State Duma that will amend articles 25 and 25.17 of the Federal Law, “On entering and exiting Russian Federation,” and article 11 of the Federal Law, “On legal status of foreign citizens in Russia.” The amendments are concerned with the use of electronic visas.

The Ministry for the Development of the Russian East has launched a project that provides for an increase in the use of electronic visas. Electronic visas will also be used in automobile, river, and mixed border control points situated in the territory of the Far Eastern Federal District.

Electronic visas have already been introduced at the following points of entry:

  • Free port Vladivostok;
  • Territory of the free economic zone in the Kaliningradskaya region;
  • Through air points of entry determined by the Russian government and situated in the territory of the Far Eastern Federal District.

Starting October 1, 2019, foreign citizens can apply for e-visas to enter Russia through immigration posts located in St.-Petersburg and the Leningrad region.

Application for e-visas to enter through immigration posts in St.-Petersburg and the Leningrad region will be possible for foreign citizens from 53 countries whose citizens can enter and exit the Russian Federation through immigration posts in St. Petersburg and the Leningrad region on the basis of one-entry standard business, tourist, and humanitarian visas, issued in electronic format.

For details on how to apply, see http://electronic-visa.kdmid.ru/index_en.html.

Back to Top


4. UNITED KINGDOM

The UK government has announced some helpful autumn rule changes for Tier 2. (For an update on Brexit no-deal contingency plans in the United Kingdom, see the feature article in this issue, above.)

The Home Office has announced various rule changes set to start in October 2019. The statement of changes runs to some 102 pages. The key changes to be aware of for Tier 2 include:

  • As anticipated, the government has confirmed the expansion of the shortage occupation list as of October 6, 2019. This is good news for employers who use Tier 2 because it means that more applications—including for architects and IT roles such as web design and development professionals, IT business analysts, programmers, and software development professionals—can be submitted without the need for prior advertisements as part of the Resident Labour Market Test;
  • PhD-level occupations will be exempt from the monthly quota as of October 6, 2019;
  • Where a Tier 2 worker in a PhD-level occupation has absences from the UK for research linked to their employment, those absences will not count in an Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) application as of October 1, 2019;
  • Changes have been made so that as of October 1, 2019, Tier 2 workers who are absent from work due to sickness, statutory parental leave, assisting in a national or international humanitarian or environmental crisis, or engaging in legal strike action may still apply for ILR even if those absences cause their salary to fall below the required threshold; and
  • As of October 1, 2019, Tier 4 (General) students have the right to work for the Tier 2 sponsor when they switch into the Tier 2 (General) category within 3 months of completion of their degree course.

If an application for leave has been made before those dates, it will be decided in accordance with the rules in force the day before.

Separately, the current government announced its intention to bring back a previously deleted category called Post Study Work. As with the previous category, the intention would be that when a student completes their UK degree, they can apply for leave valid for two years in order to “bridge the gap” between study and work. This category used to fit into Tier 1 of the Points Based System and was a very useful tool for employers to employ graduates without first sponsoring them under Tier 2. The current government has indicated that the Post Study Work category would be available to graduates who start degree-level courses next year onwards.

Details: See https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/news/tier-2-some-helpful-autumn-rule-changes-announced.

Back to Top


5. New Publications and Items of Interest

Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers: ·         The latest immigration news is at https://www.abil.com/news.cfm. ·         The latest published media releases include:

  • ABIL Says Proposed Change to Public Charge Rule Would Exclude Immigrants from Government Programs: https://www.prweb.com/releases/abil_says_proposed_change_to_public_charge_rule_would_exclude_immigrants_from_government_programs/prweb15737932.htm
  • New Data Show Increase in H-1B Denials and RFEs: https://www.prweb.com/releases/new_data_show_increase_in_h_1b_denials_and_rfes/prweb15673632.htm
  • ABIL Urges Administration to Change “Buy American and Hire American” Executive Order: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2018/05/prweb15485457.htm
  • ABIL Member Kuck Baxter Immigration Commercial Nominated for an Emmy: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2018/05/prweb15485460.htm

–   ABIL Members Note Immigration Threats for Employers in 2018: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2018/03/prweb15261255.htm

  • ABIL is available on Twitter: @ABILImmigration.
  • Recent ABIL member blogs are at http://www.abilblog.com/.

Back to Top


6. ABIL Member / Firm News

Joseph Law Firm, P.C. has a new partner and a new name. It is now Joseph & Hall P.C. See https://www.immigrationissues.com/.

Partners H. Ronald Klasko, William A. Stock, and Elise A. Fialkowski have been included in 26th edition of Best Lawyers in America in the area of immigration law.

Robert Loughran (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-loughran.cfm) was named the Best Lawyers 2020 Immigration Law “Lawyer of the Year” in Austin, Texas, for the third year. Recognition was based on the consensus of almost 50,000 leading lawyers about the professional abilities of their colleagues within the same geographical area and legal practice area. Mr. Loughran is the Managing Partner of Foster LLP‘s Austin office with a concentration in corporate immigration, investor immigration, and emigration to third countries. Mr. Loughran presents frequently before legal, professional, and academic organizations on the topics of U.S. and foreign work authorization, employer sanctions, maintenance of status, and changes in government proceedings.

Cyrus Mehta (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-mehta.cfm) was quoted by Law360 in “Attys Face Greater Urgency After High Court OKs Asylum Bar.” Mr. Mehta said that if he were to represent someone who had perhaps sneaked into the U.S. but would have been subject to the asylum bar—which only applies to those who entered the U.S. after July 15—he would treat that person as a withholding of removal or CAT relief case, and advise the migrant of the limitations. But he said he could also bring an asylum claim on the person’s behalf and challenge the legality of the regulation. For example, if the migrant had applied for asylum in a third country but hadn’t been formally denied, the case could be made that a lack of response constitutes a “de facto refusal” in a country without a functioning asylum system. The article is available by registering at https://www.law360.com/articles/1198444/attys-face-greater-urgency-after-high-court-oks-asylum-bar.

Mr. Mehta has authored a new blog entry. “Poursina v. USCIS: Federal Courts May Not Have Last Word in Reviewing Denial of a National Interest Waiver” is at http://blog.cyrusmehta.com/2019/09/poursina-v-uscis-federal-courts-may-not-have-last-word-in-reviewing-a-denial-of-a-national-interest-waiver.html.

Stacy Caplow and Maryellen Fullerton, of Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners PLLC, have co-authored a new blog entry. “Migrant ‘Protection’ Protocol: A Report From the Front Lines” is at http://blog.cyrusmehta.com/2019/09/migrant-protection-protocol-a-report-from-the-front-lines.html.

David Isaacson, of Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners PLLC, authored a new blog entry. ” ‘An Act of Cruel Injustice’: If the Trump Administration is Relying on Grudging Court Acceptance of Cruel Results as Support for the New Public Charge Rule, What Does That Say About the Rule?” is at .

Cora-Ann Pestaina, of Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners PLLC, has authored a new blog entry. “Recent H-1B Case Brings Hope that Reliance of the Umbrella ‘All Other’ Occupational Classification Need Not Be Fatal” is at .

Greg Siskind, of Siskind Susser, has been included in the 26th edition of Best Lawyers in America in the area of immigration law.

Siskind Susser, PC, has received this year’s InnovAction award from the College of Law Practice Management (along with Suffolk Law School) for its Visalaw.ai initiative. This is one of the legal field’s top awards for practice management innovation, and Siskind Susser PC is the first immigration firm to receive it in the two decades it has been awarded. See http://www.visalaw.com/siskind-susser-receives-2019-innovaction-award/.

Stephen Yale-Loehr (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-loehr.cfm?c=US) was quoted by the Houston Chronicle in “Trump Administration Blocks Most Asylum Seekers in ‘Profound’ Change to System as Legal Fights Continue.” He noted that Supreme Court justices historically have been more deferential to presidential power in immigration than in most other areas. But, recalling outrage over migrant family separation that caused the Trump administration to announce an end to the policy before a federal judge forced it to do so, he noted, “The court of public opinion is just as important as courts of law.” See https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Trump-administration-blocks-most-asylum-seekers-14439089.php.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was also quoted in the following media:

  • Wall Street Journal, “AI Workers Deserve Special Visa Consideration, Group Says” (Mr. Yale-Loehr said that proposals by a global group focused on artificial intelligence that is calling on governments to revamp their visa policies to make it easier for AI professionals to move around the world are unlikely to succeed in the United States. “I wish them well, but a lot of these things I do not think are going to be implemented in the United States,” he said. See https://www.wsj.com/articles/ai-workers-deserve-special-visa-consideration-group-says-11568107802
  • · Times of India, “Deloitte, Apple, Cognizant Biggest Filers of LCAs in FY 2019” (Mr. Yale-Loehr said the decline in H-1B filings is not limited to Indian companies. “Overall, the number of LCAs filed by the top 10 employers in the third quarter of 2019 was 218,906, down from 374,951 in the same quarter of 2018. The percentage decline is slightly higher for Indian companies, but the more significant finding is the overall decline,” he said. See https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/deloitte-apple-cognizant-biggest-filers-of-lcas-in-fy2019/articleshow/71060708.cms·
  • Law360 (available by registration), “Future of Asylum Bar Remains Uncertain, Despite Court Block.” Mr. Yale-Loehr noted that another restricted injunction could also lead to asylum seekers becoming “savvy” and deliberately entering the United States within the Ninth Circuit only. “Here with the stakes so high, I think that there are particularly compelling reasons to decide this issue nationwide and not circuit by circuit,” he said.

See https://www.law360.com/publicpolicy/articles/1196922/future-of-asylum-bar-remains-uncertain-despite-court-block

Stephen Yale-Loehr (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-loehr.cfm?c=US) was quoted in several publications about the new indefinite-detention rule:·

  • NPR, “New Trump Policy Would Permit Indefinite Detention of Migrant Families, Children,” https://n.pr/2Hl3I3T (“Federal courts have struck down almost every effort this administration has made to curtail the rights of immigrants. When will President Trump realize that immigrants in the U.S. have due process rights?”·
  • Bloomberg News, “Trump Faces Long-Shot Bid to Jail Migrant Families Indefinitely,” https://bloom.bg/2zwAjQ1 (President Trump can claim that he tried to fix our broken asylum system, but that those liberal judges in California prevented him from doing so,” Yale-Loehr said. “This will be a [political] win for Trump, even if he loses in court.”)·
  • Washington Times, “Trump Aims to Stop Surge With Family Detentions: ‘They won’t come. And many people will be saved,” (“Federal courts have struck down almost every effort this administration has made to curtail the rights of immigrants. When will President Trump realize that immigrants in the U.S. have due process rights?”)·
  • Law360, “Trump Rule To Detain Migrant Kids Unlikely To Survive Courts,” (available by registration) (Mr. Yale-Loehr said courts might find the rule to be an “arbitrary and capricious” agency action under the Administrative Procedure Act because it fails to abide by the spirit of the decades-old Flores agreement)

Mr. Yale-Loehr was interviewed in the Capitol Pressroom podcast on August 20, 2019, “Trump Immigration Changes,” http://www.wcny.org/august-20-2019-trump-immigration-changes/.
Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2019-10-01 11:27:112023-10-16 14:31:04ABIL Global Update • October 2019

ABIL Global Update • September 2019

September 04, 2019/in Global Immigration Update /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. REMOTE WORK IN COLOMBIA: AN OVERVIEW -This article provides an overview of remote work policies and practices in Colombia.

2. CANADA -The Entry/Exit Program is a significant development that has been many years in the making.

3. COLOMBIA -There have been several developments.

4. ITALY -The working holiday visa will soon be available bilaterally between Italy and Hong Kong.

5. RUSSIA -There have been a variety of developments.

6. New Publications and Items of Interest -New Publications and Items of Interest

7. ABIL Member / Firm News -ABIL Member / Firm News


Details:

1. REMOTE WORK IN COLOMBIA: AN OVERVIEW

This article provides an overview of remote work policies and practices in Colombia.

In Colombia, the immigration law establishes that those foreign individuals who work remotely and enter into a local agreement must apply for a visa whether or not they enter Colombia.

Likewise, and according to Decree 1067 of 2015, any natural or legal person who joins, employs, or admits a foreign individual through any modality, especially a labor, cooperative, or civil relationship that generates a profit, must require a visa that allows the activity, occupation, or trade declared in the visa application. Moreover, all foreigners who provide any type of service through local contracts must be registered in the platforms of Migration Colombia (SIRE) and the Ministry of Labor (RUTEC) to comply fully with the current immigration regulations. Additionally, they need to register their visas and be issued the foreigners’ ID card, which must be processed in Colombia.

Back to Top


2. CANADA

The Entry/Exit Program is a significant development that has been many years in the making.

Part of the Beyond the Border Action Plan, the Entry/Exit Program is a joint Canada-U.S. initiative that establishes a coordinated entry/exit information system to facilitate the exchange of traveler biographic information (such as name and date of birth). Collected upon entry at the common land border between the two countries, a record of entry into one country is now considered a record of exit from the other. In addition to the exchange of this data with the United States at land borders, the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) will collect exit data on all travelers leaving by air. Air carriers will begin sharing their data in 2020 and 2021. Consequently, overstay indicators will not begin appearing within the entry/exit search results for temporary residents who have overstayed their allowable time in Canada until the air carrier information is shared.

Details: http://www.cilf.ca/2019/07/22/exit-entry/

Back to Top


3. COLOMBIA

There have been several developments

Present and Future of the Mercosur Visa

Colombia, as of 2004, became an Associated State of the Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR), which has not only dealt with trade matters but has also come to regulate the mobility of people in the region. A clear example of this is the Mercosur visa, which is granted by the mutual reciprocity principle, and which seeks to authorize nationals of the countries that are part of the agreement to transit through these countries and, among others, to develop tourism and business activities.

Details: http://www.tannus.co/en/present-and-future-of-the-mercosur-visa/

The Practice of Regulated Professions by Foreign Workers

In Colombia, it is common for human resources (HR) departments to handle the employment of foreign workers. This is why it has become indispensable for HR staff to know the requirements for such workers to be legally employed, not only from the perspective of labor and social security, but also with respect to migration. Under the immigration regulations, the following, among others, must be taken into account: the visa, the registration of the visa, the foreigner ID card, notifications in SIRE and RUTEC, and permits to perform regulated professions.

Details: See http://www.tannus.co/en/the-practice-of-regulated-professions-by-foreign-workers/

Start of PEP Renewal

Migration Colombia has begun the process of renewing Special Permits for Permanence (PEP) that are about to expire for those Venezuelan nationals who are in the national territory.

Details: See http://www.tannus.co/en/start-of-pep-renewal/

Migration Flexibility for Venezuelans

The exodus of Venezuelan nationals to Colombia and the world continues, motivated by the unfortunate situation of the neighboring country, which is still going on and does not seem to have a short-term solution. For this reason, the flow of migrants is increasing, especially to South American countries, and therefore some nations have decided to modify their immigration laws. Countries such as Peru and Chile have tightened their controls and recently decided to request visas for all Venezuelans. On the contrary, Colombia continues to ease requirements and grant benefits for the entry and stay of these migrants.

Details: See http://www.tannus.co/en/migration-flexibility-venezuelans/

Back to Top


4. ITALY

The working holiday visa will soon be available bilaterally between Italy and Hong Kong.

On July 5, 2019, Italy and Hong Kong signed an agreement to mark the establishment of a bilateral Working Holiday Scheme (WHS).

Under the WHS between Hong Kong and Italy, youths aged between 18 and 30 years from each country may apply for a visa that will allow them to stay in the other country for up to 12 months. During that period, they may work to finance their stay or study short-term courses. The annual quota from each side will be 500.

The agreement was signed by the Secretary for Labour and Welfare of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR), Dr. Law Chi-kwong, and the Under Secretary of State, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of the Government of the Italian Republic, Manlio Di Stefano, at the Central Government Offices, Tamar.

Details: Visa application procedures for applicants from Hong Kong will soon be available on the website of the Consulate General of Italy in Hong Kong at https://conshongkong.esteri.it/consolato_hongkong/en/

Back to Top


5. RUSSIA

There have been a variety of developments:

Russian Government Approves Agreement With Republic of Croatia

The Russian government has approved an agreement with the Republic of Croatia, which amends a previously signed agreement on citizens of one country visiting the other. According to the agreement, the citizens of one country will be able to visit the other country without a visa for 90 days out of every 180 days, provided they have a valid identity document. The agreement is under discussion between the two countries.

Quota for Engaging Foreign Labor Slightly Increased

The Ministry of Labor and Social Development has slightly increased the quota for engaging foreign labor this year. The increase was made in all Russian regions, although it was not large, at 6 to 10 percent on average.

Updated High-Migration Risk Countries List

The high-migration risk countries list has been updated. Inclusion of a country on the list means that documents filed for the work permits, visas, invitations, and other purposes for citizens of these countries will be additionally reviewed by government officials, which will almost always result in delays in processing as well as denials of applications and/or the necessity to undergo additional administrative procedures; for example, a general manager of the inviting company may be required to be interviewed.

E-Visas to be Introduced Starting January 2021

Russian President Vladimir Putin has ordered the Prime Minister and heads of several responsible government agencies (Foreign Affairs Ministry, Internal Affairs Ministry, and Federal Security Service) to introduce a unified e-visa for foreign citizens to enter Russia starting January 1, 2021.

This will be a short-term visa (up to 16 days) and will combine several possible purposes of entry: tourist, business, humanitarian, and guest. A visa fee will be levied.

The unified e-visa will be issued for those visiting all territories of the Russian Federation (with the exception of special zones, organizations, and places where foreign nationals need special permission to enter).

Foreign Citizens Now May Enter Kaliningrad Region Using Electronic Visas

As of July 1, 2019, foreign citizens of certain countries can apply for an electronic visa to enter the Special Economic Zone in the Kaliningrad region.

Entry using electronic visas is allowed only through certain border control posts:

  • Air border control post in Kaliningrad (Hrabrovo);
  • Sea border control post in Kaliningrad: Kaliningrad, Baltiysk, Svetliy;
  • Road border control posts in Bagrationovsk, Gusev, Mamonovo, (Gzhehotki), Mamonovo (Gronovo), Morskoye, Pogranichniy, Sovetsk, and Chernyshevskoye;
  • Rail border control posts in Mamonovo and Sovetsk.

Also, the International Affairs Ministry was expected to update the website where foreign nationals can submit applications for electronic visas. It is possible to file documents for an electronic visa through https://evisa.kdmid.ru/ru-RU.

Electronic visas have been issued in Russia since August 1, 2017. On the basis of such visas, it is already possible to visit the Primorskiy Region, Kamchatka, and Sakhalin. According to International Affairs Ministry data, more than 37,500 people from 18 countries have visited Russia since the introduction of the procedure.

At the moment, according to the information from the International Affairs Ministry’s Consular Department, citizens of designated countries can apply for electronic visas (entry should be made through the specified border control posts. A list of such posts is published on the Consular Department webpage at https://evisa.kdmid.ru/ru-RU).

For the application, the electronic visa applicant does not need an invitation letter, and a personal appearance at the consulate is not required. This visa is issued free of charge. The average waiting time is 20 minutes. To apply for an electronic visa, it is necessary only to visit the International Affairs Ministry Consular Department website, complete the application form with passport data, and attach a photo.

Electronic visas are issued only for short-term visits. Such visas are only issued for 30 calendar days, starting from the issuance date. The allowed stay is up to 8 days only within the validity period. The validity period or the allowed stay cannot be extended.

Bill Simplifying Regime of Stay for Foreign Citizens Who Work in Cultural Pursuits Filed to Federation Council

The bill introduces the following:

  1. Issuance of ordinary business visas up to 30 days to foreign citizens who are entering Russia for not more than 30 calendar days for participation in performances (organization of performances and/or events on the basis of civil agreements for an agreed fee or free of charge) during which such foreign citizens perform literary works, art, or folk art, or are entering Russia on the invitation of government cultural institutions to participate in art, educational, scientific, or pedagogical work.

This category of foreign citizens does not require a work permit, work visa, or patent, and the inviting party does not require permission for engaging foreign labor.

  1. Issuance of ordinary business visas up to 1 year, and in case of reciprocity up to 5 years, to foreign citizens who are entering Russia to perform scientific research or teach upon the invitation of scientific and higher education organizations (with the exception of religious education organizations) for higher education programs that have government accreditation.

Bill Simplifying TRP (Temporary Residence Permit) and PRP (Permanent Residence Permit) Procedures for Certain Categories of Foreign Nationals is Under Review

The State Duma is reviewing a bill to simplify procedures for certain categories of foreign nationals applying for TRP and PRP in Russia.

As in the previous versions of the bill, the following is suggested:

  • The possibility for Ukrainian nationals to apply for TRP without the need to first receive a quota for the TRP application filing, provided they are refugees;
  • Documents for TRP processed within 4 months instead of 6 months;
  • The possibility for a foreign national to apply for annulment of the TRP;
  • Specific comment that TRP or PRP will be annulled in case the foreign national spends more than 6 months in a calendar year (in total) outside of Russia;
  • Several categories of foreign nationals to have the ability to file PRP applications without the need to apply for the TRP first: foreign citizens who were born in RSFSR, who are native speakers of the Russian language, who have relatives or spouses permanently living in Russia, who were deported from Crimea, and qualified foreigners as well as HQS (highly qualified specialists);
  • PRP to have unlimited validity (except for PRPs issued to qualified specialists and HQS, who will receive PRP for 3 years).

Chinese Border Control Officers Checking Contents of Smart Phones of Russian Citizens Who Enter China

It has been reported recently that Chinese authorities are checking the contents of smart phones belonging to Russian citizens crossing the China-Russia border in Guangzhou. In particular, popular messenger apps, email, and photos were checked. Checks were explained as an attempt to find those having compromising information, although there are no details on what information can be considered compromising, other than noncompliance with immigration laws. At the same time, Russian citizens have been detained who tried to enter China on the basis of business visas with the real aim of performing work activities in China.

Based on the principle of reciprocity, the Russian government may unofficially introduce the same kinds of checks.

Maldives: Agreement on Visa-Free Entry Has Come Into Force

Effective July 25, 2019, an agreement with the Government of Maldives on visa-free entry has come into force.

According to the agreement, citizens of either country may enter the other country and stay for up to 90 days. The total limit of stay will be determined by legislation of each country.

If the citizens of one country wish to stay longer in the territory of the other country or to perform work, study, or obtain permanent residence, they must apply for the appropriate visa from the authorities of the country where they wish to stay.

Andorra: Government Approves Agreement Providing for a Visa-Free Regime

Russia now has an agreement with the Government of Andorra to introduce a visa-free regime between the countries. According to the agreement, citizens of either country will be able to enter the other country and stay for up to 90 days out of every 365 days, starting from the first entry.

If the citizens of one country wish to stay longer in the territory of the other country or to perform work or commercial activities, they must apply for the appropriate visa from the authorities of the country where they wish to stay.

Botswana: Government Approves Agreement Providing for a Visa-Free Regime

Russia now has an agreement with the Government of Botswana to introduce a visa-free regime between the countries. According to the agreement, citizens of either country will be able to enter the other country and stay for up to 30 days, the total limit of stay being 90 days out of every 180 days.

If the citizens of one country wish to stay longer in the territory of the other country or to perform work, study, or obtain permanent residence, they will be required to apply for the appropriate visa from the authorities of the country where they wish to stay.

China: Government Approves Agreement Providing for a Visa-Free Regime for Tourist Groups

Russia has approved an agreement with the Government of China to introduce a visa-free regime between the countries for tourist groups.

According to the draft of the agreement, “tourist groups” are a group of citizens of the other country, from three up to 50 persons, headed by a representative of a tourist organization who enters with tourism purposes.

Members of the tourist group can travel only with the group, accompanied by the group leader (representative of the tourist organization) and according to a travel plan approved in advance (travel plan and other information about the trip must be confirmed by documentation).

The overall stay of foreign citizens in the territory of the receiving country cannot exceed 21 days.

Professional Mastership Championships

An organization approved by the Russian Government to represent Russia in the “Worldskills International Championship” will be able to hire foreign nationals without the need to receive corporate employment permission for the period of preparation and the events of the organization in the territory of Russia.

Foreign nationals will be able to work at championships in Russia without the need for a work permit or patent. Invitation letters to such foreigners will be issued irrespective of the allocated quota. The list of championships is determined by the Russian Government.

Visa Formalities Simplified for Artists and Scientists

According to a new law, a standard business visa valid for 30 days can be issued to foreign citizens who enter Russia for a period of not more than 30 days:

  • For an artistic tour (organization of performances and/or events on the basis of civil agreements for an agreed fee or free of charge) during which such foreign citizens perform literary works, art, or folk art; or
  • Upon invitation of government cultural institutions to participate in art, educational, scientific, or pedagogical work.

These categories of foreign nationals do not need to apply for a work permit or patent as well as a work visa.

Employers can engage such foreign citizens without applying for a corporate employment permit (Law: On the status of foreign citizens in Russia).

Year of Theatre: Visas for Guests are Free of Charge

The Russian Government has issued an order under which foreign participants and guests of events of the Year of Theatre 2019 can receive visas to Russia free of charge. Mass media participating in the events can also apply for Russian visas free of charge at Russian consulates abroad.

Applications for visas are filed by the Ministry of Culture and members of the Year of Theatre 2019 organization committee.

2019 Quota Amended

The Ministry of Labor and Social Development has again redistributed the quota for foreign labor for this year. Quotas have been insignificantly raised for almost all Russian regions, including Moscow.

Citizenship for Qualified Specialists

Qualified specialists soon will be able to apply for Russian citizenship after only one year of working in Russia, starting October 2019. These include foreign citizens and stateless persons who work in Russia as qualified specialists.

To be eligible a foreign citizen must work in a specific position (the list of occupations is approved by the Ministry of Labor and Social Development), and his or her employer must have made the necessary payments to the Russian Pension Fund.

The list is lengthy, including occupations such as midwife, veterinarian, doctor, laboratory assistant, psychiatrist, statistician, gas welder, chief project engineer, chief metallurgist, director of economics, various types of engineer, mathematician, nurse, medical laboratory technician, process pipeline installer, pharmacy laboratory specialist, locksmith, ship repairman, pharmacist, electrician, medical assistant, grinder, drilling technician, and others.

Back to Top


6. New Publications and Items of Interest

Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers:

  • The latest immigration news is at https://www.abil.com/news.cfm.
  • The latest published media releases include:
    • ABIL Says Proposed Change to Public Charge Rule Would Exclude Immigrants from Government Programs
    • New Data Show Increase in H-1B Denials and RFEs
    • ABIL Urges Administration to Change “Buy American and Hire American” Executive Order
    • ABIL Member Kuck Baxter Immigration Commercial Nominated for an Emmy
    • ABIL Members Note Immigration Threats for Employers in 2018
  • ABIL is available on Twitter: @ABILImmigration.
  • Recent ABIL member blogs are at http://www.abilblog.com/.

Back to Top


7. ABIL Member / Firm News

Charles Foster, of Foster LLP, was featured along with some of the nation’s experts on immigration reform in the “Rational Middle Immigration Documentary Series, exploring how to solve the United States’ immigration challenges and remake the U.S. economy while protecting U.S. values, workers, and families. The first season is a collection of short films and is available by clicking .

Klasko Immigration Law Partners was named for the fourth year in a row to the 2019 Best Places to Work annual list published by the Philadelphia Business Journal.

William Stock, of Klasko Immigration Law Partners, LLP, was placed on Human Resource Executive Magazine’s and Lawdragon’s annual joint publication of the “best of” lawyer list for its 12th year. In 2018, the firm’s managing partner, H. Ronald Klasko, was inducted into Lawdragon’s Hall of Fame. For more information, see Klasko Law Partners, LLP website, as well as Lawdragon.

Charles Kuck was quoted by the Atlanta Journal Constitution in “Georgia’s Immigration Court Judges Among Toughest in Nation for Asylum.” “I have never seen [immigration] courts as dire as these ones [in Georgia] in the context of granting asylum, which seem to be so far out of the mainstream, not just of other courts around the country but of the actual law itself of asylum,” he said.

Mr. Kuck was quoted by the Atlanta Journal Constitution in “New Details: ICE Detainee From Mexico Dies in South Georgia.” “It is unconscionable. It should be shut down,” Mr. Kuck said of the Stewart Detention Center.

Mr. Kuck recently discussed “the flawed logic of the new Expedited Removal reg, and 9 things we can do to protect ourselves from ICE over-enforcement! We also talk about the Padilla/Matter of M-S- ruling on asylum bonds.” See #TheImmigrationHour on Twitter.

Mr. Kuck was quoted by the New York Times in “What Happens After an ICE Raid? Explaining the Deportation Process.” Mr. Kuck noted that authorities in the past have used ruses to coax their targets into cooperating, like pretending to be looking for someone else.

Mr. Kuck has released a new podcast series, the Immigration Hour. The latest episode discusses the “raids” that did not occur, the economic impact of the current climate, the role of Ken Cuccinelli as new Director of USCIS, and the “new” anti-asylum regulations. The podcast is available at Stitcher.

Kuck Baxter Immigration LLC has opened a new office in Adel, Georgia, near the Irwin, Folkston, and Stewart Detention Centers, which hold more than 5,000 detained immigrants. The new office will be run by Elizabeth Matherne, who is the former Southern Poverty Law Center’s director for the Irwin Detention Project.

Robert Loughran presented “Update on Nonimmigrant Visa Processing at U.S. Consulates Abroad” on May 18, 2019, at the Federal Bar Association’s Immigration Law Conference in Austin, Texas.

Mr. Loughran presented “How Employment-Based Immigration Practice Has Evolved Under the Current Administration to Include Litigation” on June 13, 2019, at the State Bar of Texas Annual meeting in Austin.

David Isaacson, of Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners PLLC, has authored a new blog entry, “.”

Cyrus Mehta and Stephen Yale-Loehr were quoted by the Times of India in “As U.S. EB-5 Visas Become Expensive, Indian Applications Expected to Slump.” Mr. Yale-Loehr said, “The new EB-5 changes will affect investors from India in a variety of ways. First, I predict a surge of EB-5 petition filings until November 21. After that, I expect a sharp decline in EB-5 petitions, as fewer people will be able to satisfy the new minimum investment amount.” Mr. Mehta noted that many of the attractive projects that are designated in targeted employment areas in metropolitan areas may no longer receive such a designation after November 21, so the investment will go from $500,000 currently for such a project to $1.8 million. “Under the current RBI [Reserve Bank of India] guideline of only allowing $250,000 to be remitted out of India per financial year, the higher investment amounts will serve as a further disincentive. I predict that there will be a rush to file EB-5 applications before the rule change on November 21.

Cyrus Mehta has published a new blog entry, “Save Optional Practical Training for Foreign Students.”

Bettina Offer and Gabriele Mastmann, of Offer & Mastmann, and Gunther Mävers were nominated by Best Lawyers in Germany and Handelsblatt for immigration.

Angelo Paparelli was quoted by Law360 in “How Attorneys Can Brace for Rising EB-5 Compliance Checks.” Mr. Paparelli said that unannounced site visits can be unstructured, but a regional center should establish a formal procedure for communicating with officials from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and take charge of the process. He said a designated representative from the center should ask officers to identify themselves, whether they have a judicial subpoena or warrant, and what specifically they are seeking. He said they should also engage counsel and suggest following up via email to provide requested documentation in an organized manner. A lawyer can then act as an intermediary to narrow the scope of the site visit, asking whether USCIS is interested in a particular investor or investment project, he noted. The article is available by registering at Law360.

Mr. Paparelli was profiled in the Los Angeles Daily Journal. The profile notes, among other things, that along with compliance audits, counsel and due diligence in mergers, acquisitions and corporate restructuring, Mr. Paparelli focuses on newly developed problems with sponsored worker immigration issues. “This is a time of historically unprecedented executive branch opposition to the legal, employment-based process for sponsorship of highly skilled noncitizens and intense immigration-related work site enforcement,” he said, noting that it is essential to maintain clients’ confidentiality due to fears of government retaliation. The article is available by subscription at https://www.dailyjournal.com/.

Rodrigo Tannus has authored several new articles in Diario la República:

  • “Presente y futuro de la visa Mercosur“
  • “Profesiones reguladas por trabajadores extranjeros“
  • “Flexibilizacion migratoria para venezolanos“

Stephen Yale-Loehr was quoted by Axios in “.” Mr. Yale-Loehr noted that although U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers frequently stay out of a church if undocumented immigrants are staying there, churches do not provide federal legal sanctuary. “I think for publicity reasons, immigration enforcement does not like to go into churches,” he said.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Reuters in “U.S. to Expand Rapid Deportation Nationwide With Sweeping New Rule.” Mr. Yale-Loehr said the new policy will create chaos and fear in immigrant communities and could have unintended consequences. “U.S. citizens could be expeditiously removed by error. You don’t have a lot of room to challenge that. You can’t go before an immigration judge,” he noted.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted in several other media outlets about the expansion of expedited removal:

  • New York Times: “Trump Administration Expands Fast-Tracked Deportations for Undocumented Immigrants“
  • Law360: “DHS Vastly Expands Deportation Authority,” available by registering here.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Tampa Bay Times in “.” Immigration enforcement agents can now “round up anybody they could find, whether they had a criminal conviction or not,” he noted.

Stephen Yale-Loehr was interviewed by Raw Story in “Immigration Expert Explains Why Trump’s Migrant Policy Won’t Work.” Among other things, in response to a question asking for his thoughts on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, he said, “All countries need some kind of immigration enforcement agency. The question is how to manage immigration enforcement humanely and effectively. Moreover, Congress will never appropriate enough money to round up and deport all 11 million undocumented immigrants estimated to be in the United States. We should focus our limited priorities on removing terrorists, not people who simply overstayed their visas.”

Mr. Yale-Loehr discussed “Immigration Meritocracy,” regarding his new research project studying merit-based immigration, what a “merit-based” immigration system means, and how it would work in the United States, in a podcast presented by the Everyday Immigration Podcast, produced by LionCeau Productions.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by a variety of news outlets regarding reports of possible immigration raids:

  • Voice of America: U.S. immigration raids planned. Mr. Yale-Loehr said, “Given the inefficiencies in the immig ration court system, many people may have been ordered deported illegally because the immigration agency didn’t have their correct address to notify them about their immigration court date. In such cases, they may have the right to reopen their immigration case,” he said. Mr. Yale-Loehr noted that undocumented people living in the U.S. have certain constitutional rights. “Immigration agents are not legally allowed to forcibly enter a home [without authorization]. Immigrants can refuse to open the door when an agent approaches, unless the agents have a valid search warrant.”
  • Reuters (several newspapers): “Two thousand people deported is not that large in the annual scheme of things,” said Stephen Yale-Loehr, pointing out that the administration of former President Obama deported more than 400,000 people a year during his first term. “On the other hand, the mere fact that they are announcing these raids is sending fear among immigrants and is causing them to hide or take other actions,” he said. The article notes that President Trump will want to show his supporters that he is delivering on campaign promises to crack down on illegal immigration, a signature policy objective of his administration. “He’s been trying to do something for months,” Mr. Yale-Loehr said.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was also quoted in the following media on the same topic:

  • Lawandcrime.com: ICE scheduling raids to arrest alleged undocumented immigrants – what to know
  • Daily Mail: Trump-backed ICE raids have already started in California ahead of thousands of immigrants being rounded up nationwide this weekend, claim lawyers
  • Quartz: The best ways to help immigrants in the US caught up in ICE raids
  • Syracuse.com: On eve of planned immigration raids, Syracuse advocates remind people of their rights
  • City & State: New York’s limited power to resist ICE raids
  • Business Insider: Immigrants have rights when ICE comes to arrest them, but experts warn this only goes so far
  • Univision: Did you know that a deportation order can be challenged? (Spanish)
  • Marketplace

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2019-09-04 10:54:372023-08-14 14:10:17ABIL Global Update • September 2019

ABIL Global Update • June 2019

June 28, 2019/in Global Immigration Update /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. PASSPORTS: AN OVERVIEW -This article provides an overview of passport policies and practices in several countries.

2. FRANCE -The French government has issued a decree to implement an ordinance specifying the conditions for issuing residence permits to British nationals to continue their stay in France after the Brexit date, in the event of no exit agreement being reached between the UK and EU.

3. ITALY -The Italian government has announced the numbers of foreign workers to be allowed into Italy in 2019. Also, there has been a new Italian citizenship scam, with more than 1,500 cases involved.

4. RUSSIA -There has been a variety of developments.

5. TURKEY -There have been several developments: The General Migration Directorate is eliminating postal filing of residence permit renewal applications. Turkey has increased efforts to attract foreign investment. Foreigners must now obtain “E-devlet” online accounts to obtain certain documents and information.

6. UNITED KINGDOM -Eligible nationals of the United States and six other countries can now use electronic passport control gates when they enter the United Kingdom.

7. New Publications and Items of Interest -New Publications and Items of Interest

8. ABIL Member / Firm News -ABIL Member / Firm News


Details:

1. PASSPORTS: AN OVERVIEW

This article provides an overview of passport policies and practices in several countries.

Canada

General guidance. There is no requirement for travel to Canada that a passport must be valid for at least 6 months. Instead, the general rule is that anyone seeking to enter Canada as a temporary resident (to visit, work, or study), regardless of age (including newborns) or nationality, must travel with a passport valid for the duration of their proposed stay. Immigration officers will not issue visitor records, work permits, or study permits valid past the expiration date of the passport. There is an exception to this rule for U.S. citizens, under section 52(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations. Not all immigration officers are familiar with this rule and U.S. citizens applying for a temporary resident document may need to remind officers of this provision. Otherwise, they may receive a document valid only until the expiration date of the passport.

Entering Canada by air. It is important to remember that while Canadian immigration authorities may allow certain individuals to enter Canada without a passport, airlines set their own rules regarding what documentation is required to board a plane. It is therefore highly recommended that all travelers carry a valid passport when flying to Canada.

All Canadian citizens, including dual citizens, must present a valid Canadian passport to fly to Canada. This is because Canadian citizens and permanent residents cannot be issued an Electronic Travel Authorization (eTA) or a temporary resident visa. Airlines may refuse to board any passenger who does not have a valid eTA, temporary resident visa, Canadian permanent resident card, or Canadian passport. Dual Canadian-U.S. citizens with a valid U.S. passport are exempt from this requirement and may enter Canada with the valid U.S. passport, but a best practice for dual American/Canadian citizens is to use their U.S. passport for entry to the United States and their Canadian passport for entry to Canada.

Entering Canada by land. U.S. citizens may enter Canada with proof of citizenship and identity, such as by presenting a valid U.S. passport card, NEXUS card, or Enhanced Driver’s License. It is nonetheless recommended that U.S. citizens enter Canada at a land border with a valid U.S. passport because U.S. border officials on re-entry to the United States will counsel U.S. citizens on the need to have a passport. Commercial carriers (buses and trains) may have their own rules and refuse to transport passengers without a valid passport.

Citizens of other countries must present a valid passport (and a visa, if required).

Applying for permanent residence. Those applying for permanent residence are asked at the final stage of processing to provide a passport that is valid for at least 6 months.

Canadian passport validity period. Canadian passports for children (under 16 years old at the time of application) are valid for up to 5 years, and adult passports are valid for up to 10 years.

Colombia

The Colombian Ministry of Foreign Affairs states that the Ordinary Electronic Colombian Passport holds 32 pages and has a validity of 10 years. Colombian nationals can obtain the passport by completing a form from the Ministry and presenting the original Cedula de Ciudadania, which is the local identification. For minors, one of their parents must be present for such a request and bring the minor’s birth certificate.

The Colombian passport can be requested in a variety of scenarios, such as a voluntary change, for rectification of data in the identity document, for expiration, for damage that prevents its use, for theft or loss, when the current passport does not have enough pages, or for reaching the age of majority (18 years old). A Colombian national cannot hold two passports at the same time.

Italy

The Italian passport is both a travel and an identification document. It is issued by the Police (Questura) in Italy (for Italian nationals residing in Italy) or by the embassies/consulates abroad (for Italian nationals residing outside Italy).

The standard passport is called an “Ordinary Passport” and its validity depends on the age of the holder.

There are no specific timelines for requesting a new passport; the application can be filed well before the current passport expiration date. Under some circumstances, it is possible to apply for a second passport.

Details

Back to Top


2. FRANCE

The French government has issued a decree to implement Ordinance No. 2019-76 of 6 February 2019, which specifies the conditions for issuing residence permits to British nationals to continue their stay in France after the Brexit date, in the event of no exit agreement being reached between the United Kingdom (UK) and the European Union.

Decree no. 2019-264 of 2 April 2019 was published in the Journal Officiel on 3 April 2019. The following are the principal conditions of issuance of the residence permits to British nationals and their family members.

Transition period of 12 months. UK nationals and family members continuing their stay and professional activities beyond the Brexit date may do so for a maximum period of 12 months after the Brexit date. During this transition period, they do not need to possess a residence permit.

Residence permit application to be requested within 6 months following the Brexit. UK nationals who wish to remain in France beyond this transition period will have 6 months after the Brexit date to apply for one of the appropriate residence permits.

How to apply for a residence permit. The decree details the documents that UK nationals and their family members will provide in support of their application according to the appropriate residence permit for which they are eligible.

Tax amount. The amount of the tax due for the issuance of a residence permit is reduced to 100 euros for British nationals and their family members instead of 269 euros applicable to third-country nationals.

Details: Client alert

Back to Top


3. ITALY

The Italian government has announced the numbers of foreign workers to be allowed into Italy in 2019. Also, there has been a new Italian citizenship scam, with more than 1,500 cases involved.

Numbers of foreign workers announced. The Italian government has announced a cap of 30,850 on the number of workers from outside the European Economic Area to be allowed into Italy for 2019. The decree, dated March 12, 2019, was published in the Official Gazette of April 9, 2019.

The figure and the categories of workers allowed this year are not very different from those announced in recent years. Once again, no quotas for standard sponsored employment have been issued (apart from a few exceptions).

More than half of the total is reserved to entries for seasonal work (18,000); the majority of the remainder is reserved to permit conversion (9,850) for foreign citizens already in possession of a residence permit in Italy or the European Union (study, seasonal work, permanent) intending to change status, i.e., to convert the existing permit into a permit for employment/self-employment.

The remaining few are for self-employment work (2,400) and special categories of foreigners (600) (such as South American citizens with Italian ancestors or individuals who have completed a specific training in their country of residence).

Citizenship scam. The Public Prosecutor’s Office in Rome and the Rome Police recently shut down an organized crime group run by an official in the Ministry of the Interior, which granted Italian citizenship to people who were not entitled to it by exploiting access to the SICITT computer system used by the Department of Civil Liberties and Immigration in the Ministry of the Interior to process Italian citizenship applications.

The President of the Italian Republic has already revoked the status of some of these new Italian citizens by stripping them of their Italian citizenship because they did not meet the legal requirements. Those desiring Italian citizenship are warned to be wary of any agencies or advisors offering to help obtain Italian citizenship easily or in a very short period of time, and regardless of the applicant’s residency in Italy for the necessary minimum time required, criminal history, or insufficient income.

Details: Numbers of foreign workers; citizenship scam (in Italian)

Back to Top


4. RUSSIA

There has been a variety of developments: Companies inviting foreign nationals will soon have more responsibilities. President Putin has simplified the citizenship process for certain categories. Deported foreign citizens will have to compensate Russia for expenses related to their deportation. There are also updates on admission for the International Tchaikovsky Competition in Moscow and St. Petersburg, visa-free travel between Russia and Cape Verde, and UEFA Euro 2020 (soccer competition) migration issues. Also, there are new state fee payment certificate requirements for invitation letters. HIV Certificate requirements were recently approved by the Ministry of Health. Visa formalities between Iranians and Russians have been simplified for entrepreneurs. Visa-free travel for Russian citizens is now allowed to Suriname. The Federal Penalty Execution Service will be added to the list of agencies that can decide on the desirability of stay of foreign citizens in Russia, and the Ministry of Justice will be removed, starting January 1, 2020. The application process for residence permits has been simplified for certain categories of foreign nationals. The Economic Development Ministry has proposed lowering the minimum salary level for Highly Qualified Specialists. A new accreditation card will allow participants in certain international cultural mass events to enter Russia visa-free for the defined period of such events.

Companies Inviting Foreign Nationals Will Soon Have More Responsibilities

New procedures to be followed by companies inviting foreign nationals has been submitted for governmental review and final approval. In particular, the new regulations require that companies sponsoring visas for foreign nationals must take several measures to ensure that the invited foreign national complies with restrictions on the purpose of stay established by the visa, as well as the authorized period of stay, and exits Russia in a timely manner.

Among other things, companies will need to notify an invited foreigner staying longer than 10 days about these requirements, and issue reminders of visa expiration and the need to leave Russia. If an invited foreigner does not comply, the company must notify the Ministry of Internal Affairs.

These requirements will not be applied to embassies and consulates of foreign countries or representative offices of international organizations.

Putin Simplifies Citizenship Process for Certain Categories

President Vladimir Putin issued Order #187 on April 29, 2019, which introduced new categories of foreign citizens and stateless persons who can apply for Russian citizenship following a simplified procedure. Also, on April 24, 2019, President simplified the procedure for obtaining Russian citizenship for residents of Donetsk and Lugansk.

The simplified procedure for obtaining Russian citizenship means that an application for Russian citizenship can be filed regardless of the time during which the foreigner lived in Russia and/or had a Residency Permit.

Apart from residents of Donetsk and Lugansk Republics, the following categories of foreign nationals received the right to apply for Russian citizenship following the simplified procedure:

Ukrainian nationals, stateless persons and their children (including adopted), spouses and parents:

  1. who don’t have citizenships of other countries, and
  2. who were born and permanently reside in the territories of Crimea and Sevastopol, and
  3. who exited these territories until March 18, 2014;

Ukrainian nationals, stateless persons as well as their children (including adopted), spouses and parents who have a:

  1. TRP (Temporary Residence Permit);
  2. PRP (Permanent Residence Permit);
  3. Refugee Certificate;
  4. Certificate confirming the grant of temporary refuge; or
  5. Certificate of the participant in the state program for the returning of compatriots, residing abroad, to Russia

AND

  1. Who permanently resided in the territories of Donetsk and Lugansk Republics before the April 7, 2014, and April 27, 2014, respectively;

Foreign citizens and stateless persons as well as their relatives, if they were unlawfully deported from Crimea;

Citizens of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, Republic of Iraq, Yemen Republic, and Syrian Arab Republic and their children (including adopted), spouses and parents:

  1. who were born on the territory of the former RSFSR; and
  2. had USSR citizenship.

The Presidential Order also introduces the application form that must be filed by the foreign citizens listed above. Applications must be filed at the local offices of the Ministry of Internal Affairs depending on the applicant’s resident address.

The application must be supported by the following documentation:

  • Confirmation of the person’s ID and citizenship or statelessness;
  • Medical test results confirming that the person is not addicted or infected and does not have HIV (there are exceptions to this requirement);
  • Confirmations of family relationships (e.g., birth certificate, marriage certificate);
  • Confirmation of authorization for the foreigner’s stay in Russia (e.g., visa, migration card, TRP, PRP);
  • Confirmation of residency in certain territories (e.g., extract from the tenant’s book, copy of the utilities bill if there is no residency confirmation in the ID document).

An application for Russian citizenship can be denied if the foreign citizen or stateless person:

  • Calls for violent change of the constitutional order;
  • Participated in armed conflicts;
  • Participated in extremist activities and poses a danger to the security of the Russian Federation and its citizens;
  • Is banned from entering Russia;
  • Used falsified documentation or supplied false information;
  • Was a member of the armed forces of a foreign country or served in foreign security agencies;
  • Has a criminal record that has not been expunged or has not expired yet;
  • Is criminally prosecuted;
  • Serves jail time;
  • Participates in activities of an organization, including the list of organizations and persons who are considered to be involved in extremist activities and terrorism;
  • Is the subject of a decision by an inter-department coordination council, which functions to prevent financing of terrorism, to block this person’s accounts or properties; or
  • Is the subject of a court decision blocking this person’s bank account transactions and other operations with funds and property.

Applications must be reviewed within three months.

More on simplified procedures for Russian citizenship and residence permits. On May 7, 2019, the Russian government approved a number of bills that introduce simplified procedures for obtaining Russian citizenship as well as TRPs (Temporary Residence Permits) and PRPs (Permanent Residence Permits).

Qualified foreign specialists who have worked in Russia for 1 year will have the right to apply for Russian citizenship following a simplified procedure. Currently, such foreign citizens must work in Russia for 3 years before their citizenship applications can be considered. A list of professions of qualified foreign citizens and stateless persons is issued by the Ministry of Labor. For example, this list contains professions in high demand in the Russian labor market, such as doctors of various medical specialties, other medical professionals, engineers, locksmiths, technical professionals, electricians, and others.

The following categories of foreign citizens will be able to apply for Temporary Residence Permits without a quota:

  • Residents of Ukraine; and
  • Stateless persons who permanently reside in Ukraine and who received refugee status or obtained refuge in Russia.

Also it is suggested that the following categories of foreign nationals will receive the right to apply for PRPs without having to apply first for TRPs:

  • Foreign nationals who were born in the RSFSR and who had USSR citizenship;
  • Foreign nationals who were deported from Crimea as well as their relatives;
  • Foreign nationals who were born in Russia and were adopted by foreign nationals (including highly qualified specialists) and others.

Finally, the bills introduce PRPs that will be issued for an unlimited period of time, with the exception of PRPs issued to HQS (Highly Qualified Specialist) work permit holders as well as qualified specialists and their family members. They will be issued 3-year PRPs.

A foreign citizen who receives an unlimited PRP will need to notify the local office of the Ministry of Internal Affairs regarding their residence in Russia annually. Once every 5 years, such notification must be filed in person. If the foreign citizen fails to file this notification 2 years in a row, the PRP will be annulled.

It is not yet clear when these bills will come into force.

Deported Foreign Citizens to Compensate Russia for Related Expenses

Currently, if a foreign citizen is deported or administratively removed from Russia, he or she must cover the costs of the procedure. If the foreign citizen lacks the funds, the “inviting party” must cover the costs, for example, a company or organization that issued the invitation letter. If the appropriate inviting party is not found, the federal budget covers the expenses. New proposed legislation under review says that in cases where federal funds are used, the foreign citizen must compensate the Russian government after their deportation/removal is complete. Such expenses may include flight/train/bus tickets for the foreign citizen and official accompanying him or her; the foreign citizen’s stay in a facility until the deportation/removal is executed; and paperwork and other expenses related to the procedure.

International Tchaikovsky Competition

The 16th International Tchaikovsky Competition, which occurs every four years, will be held June 17 through 29, 2019, in Moscow and St. Petersburg. To simplify migration formalities for participants, the government has introduced a bill to the State Duma that amends FL-115, “On the legal status of foreign citizens in Russia.”

During the competition, the administration of the competition will not be required to apply for permission to employ foreign citizens to serve as jury members. Jury members will also not be required to obtain a work permit or patent to work in Russia.

Visa-Free Travel Between Russia and Cape Verde

On April 26, 2019, the Russian government issued an order to the International Affairs Ministry to sign, after the necessary negotiations take place, an agreement with the Cape Verde Republic that will allow visa-free travel between the countries.

According to the draft of the agreement, citizens of the two countries will be able to travel visa-free to the territory of the other country. The period of stay will not exceed 60 calendar days. The total period of stay within the specified timeframe will be set according to the legislation of each country. Russia uses the common rule of 90/180, which means that Cape Verde citizens would be able to stay in Russia for 90 days out of each 180 days.

Article 8 of the agreement draft provides that countries can deny entry or shorten the period of stay for the citizen of the other country if the presence of the foreign national would be considered undesirable.

Also, if citizens of one country decide they wish to perform work activities, study, or reside in the other country, they will be required to apply for the appropriate visa.

UEFA Euro 2020 Migration Issues

Legislation was amended in May 2019 to provide for the preparation and management of an upcoming soccer event, the European Cup UEFA (Union of European Football Associations) 2020. Migration formalities will be simplified for the participants, volunteers, and spectators of UEFA Euro 2020.

The “UEFA Euro 2020 preparation period” is from June 1, 2019, until the date defined as 1 month before the date of the first match of UEFA Euro 2020. The “UEFA Euro 2020 period” is calculated from the date when the preparation period is over until December 31, 2020.

Foreign citizens participating in UEFA Euro 2020 (organizers) will receive multiple-entry ordinary business/work visas at Russian consulates abroad for a period of up to 1 year with the possibility to extend work visas in Russia. Applications must be filed on the basis of invitation letters, which in turn will be issued on the basis of applications from the Russian Football Association or its local organization, provided that applicants are included on official FIFA/UEFA lists. Visa applications will be processed within three business days, and payment of consular fees or other processing fees will not be required. Extension of work visas will be based on the application from the Russian Football Association or its local organization.

Such foreign citizens will be able to work in Russia without the need to obtain work permits or patents.

Sportsmen (competition participants) will receive multiple-entry ordinary humanitarian visas at Russian consulates abroad. Applications must be filed on the basis of invitation letters, which will in turn be issued on the basis of applications from the Russian Football Association or its local organization, provided that applicants are included on official FIFA/UEFA lists. Applications will be processed within three business days, and payment of consular fees or other processing fees will not be required.

Such foreign citizens will not need to obtain work permits or patents.

Foreign citizens will be able to use public transport in St. Petersburg and Leningradskaya Region for free during the competition period.

Volunteers will receive either 1-entry or 2–entry ordinary humanitarian visas at Russian consulates abroad for a period of up to three months or multiple-entry ordinary humanitarian visas for a term of up to one year with the possibility of a continuous stay of not more than 180 days. Visas will be issued on the basis of invitation letters that will be based on applications from the Russian Football Association or its local organizations.

Volunteers will be able to perform work activities in Russia without a work permit. Organizations that will use their labor will not be required to apply for permission to engage foreign labor. Such organizations will not need to file any notifications to authorities connected with employment of volunteers.

Spectators will be able to enter Russia without a visa during the period starting 14 days before the first match in St. Petersburg until the day of the last match in St. Petersburg plus 10 calendar days after that date.

To enter Russia as a spectator without a visa, the person must bring a passport and a personal spectator card (Fan ID).

UEFA Euro 2020 spectators will be able to use public transport for free in St. Petersburg and the Leningradskaya region during the competition period.

For UEFA Euro 2020 suppliers, media specialists, and other employees of such organizations, companies that will supply products or services for UEFA Euro 2020 as well as media organizations will be able to apply for the permission to engage foreign labor using a simplified procedure. Processing of such applications will be accelerated. Also, foreign employees of such organizations will be able to apply for work permits and patents using simplified and accelerated procedures. Government fees for processing applications for such permits as well as invitation letters will not be charged.

Workers of accredited media organizations will be able to use public transport in St. Petersburg and the Leningradskaya region free of charge during the competition period.

Address registration during UEFA Euro 2020

For the period of UEFA Euro 2020, the following categories of foreign nationals will not have to be registered:

  • Foreign citizens and stateless persons participating in UEFA Euro 2020 events;
  • Sportsmen; and
  • FIFA representatives.

Currently, registration rules for other foreign citizens during UEFA Euro 2020 are not changed. During FIFA Cups 2017 and 2018, for security reasons, the rules were changed by presidential order. For example, during FIFA Cup 2018, all foreign citizens regardless of visa type were required to register address within three calendar days of arrival (including highly qualified specialists and their family members). Also, registrations through the Post Office were banned.

No amendments to this presidential order have been issued, although it is highly likely that in 2020 similar security measures will be introduced.

New State Fee Payment Certificate Requirements for Invitation Letters

According to the Internal Affairs Ministry Moscow office, as of May 27, 2019, documents for invitation letters are being accepted only with the state fee payment certificate showing that the fee has been paid directly from the inviting company’s bank account.

It is not mandatory (but preferred) to provide the original payment certificate verified by the bank that made the transfer. It is allowed to provide the state fee payment certificate with the original inviting company’s stamp. The full name of the invited person on the payment certificate is also required, but it is possible to enter the name by hand.

Also, the payment certificate can be filed not only with the application for the invitation letter but also when collecting the approved invitation letter, except when the application is filed for the so-called electronic invitation letter (when the immigration authority sends an approved electronic invitation letter directly to the consulate through official channels of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs). In such cases, the payment certificate should be filed exclusively with the application forms.

HIV Certificate Requirements

HIV Certificate requirements were recently approved by the Ministry of Health. The Ministry of Health Order was registered by the Ministry of Justice on May 6, 2019. The document introduces the unified HIV Certificate template, which must be used from now on. Information in the Certificate will be presented both in Russian and in English. The validity remains the same, three months.

Iran—Simplification of Visa Formalities for Entrepreneurs

As of May 8, 2019, visa formalities for entrepreneurs have been simplified between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Russian Federation. Previously, to confirm the purpose of the visit of an Iranian national to Russia, entrepreneurs and representatives of organizations of entrepreneurs had to obtain a letter from the inviting national association of manufacturers and entrepreneurs, such as the Trade and Industry Chamber or Russia Union of manufacturers and entrepreneurs. Now to confirm the purpose of such a visit, it is enough to get a letter from the inviting party (legal entity, its branch, government, or local authority).

Suriname—Visa-Free Travel

As of May 13, 2019, Russian citizens can travel to Suriname without a visa and stay in that country for up to 90 calendar days. Suriname citizens can also travel to Russia visa-free and stay for up to 90 calendar days out of every 180 days. Citizens of one country who would like to stay or reside in the territory of the other country for more than 90 calendar days, or perform work or commercial activities, must apply for a visa.

Russia to Add Agency to List of Those Deciding on Desirability of Stay of Foreign Citizens

The Russian government will add the Federal Penalty Execution Service (FPES) to the list of governmental agencies that can issue decisions on the desirability of stay of foreign citizens in Russia (except for cases when such a decision is issued due to a threat to public health). The Ministry of Justice was charged with the task of issuing decisions on the desirability of stay of foreign citizens in Russia who committed serious crimes while staying in the country or who were in prison in Russia for committing such crimes. Now these rights will be transferred to the FPES as of January 1, 2020.

Residence Permit Process to be Simplified for Certain Foreign Nationals

A bill that introduces a simplified procedure for TRP (temporary residence permit) and PRP (permanent residence permit) applications for several categories of foreign nationals has been submitted to the State Duma for review. The State Duma representative confirmed that it intends to review the bill as a high priority.

Apart from amendments suggested earlier by the government in this area, such as Ukrainians receiving TRPs without the need to apply for the TRP quota place first, as well as shortening the application review period to four months, the bill makes clear one of the most popular bases for TRP application rejection: when a foreign national is confirmed to have spent more than six months outside of Russia. Thus, the bill provides that a TRP application will be rejected and an issued TRP will be annulled if a foreign national has spent more than six months in total outside of Russia during one calendar year (with an exception for cases when the foreign national could not leave the territory of the foreign country due to emergency medical treatment or serious illness, or death of a close relative, as well as for cases when a foreign national spent more time outside of Russia due to work).

Additionally, the bill provides for a foreign national to apply for the annulment of a TRP. At present, this procedure is not clarified by law, which leads to complexities in cases when, for example, a TRP holder has to work in another Russia region than the one where he or she was issued the TRP and apply for the work permit there. Ordinarily, a TRP holder can only perform work activities in the Russian region where he or she was issued the TRP.

The bill also introduces a list of categories of foreign citizens who have the right to apply for the PRP without the need to first file for the TRP and live for one year on its basis in Russia.

Economic Development Ministry Proposes Lowering Minimum Salary Level for Highly Qualified Specialists

To attract more qualified foreign labor, the Economic Development Ministry has proposed that a minimum salary level for HQS (Highly Qualified Specialists) should be lowered. At the moment, the minimum salary level, with exception of those working in special economic zones and scientific institutions, is 167,000 RUB gross per month.

The Ministry also proposed that one should be able to receive HQS status via the Internet on the basis of work experience information. Additionally, the Ministry would prefer that HQS be offered Russian citizenship without the need to renounce their current citizenship.

Finally, the Ministry has proposed that foreign nationals who graduated from Russian universities should be able to apply for Russian citizenship following a simplified procedure, again without the need to renounce their current citizenship.

Accreditation Card to Allow Visa-Free Entry for International Cultural Mass Events

A Ministry of Culture Order has introduced the accreditation card, which will allow participants in international cultural mass events to enter Russia visa-free for the defined period of such events. The list of the events during which visa-free travel is allowed is confirmed by the government, including:

  • International Tchaikovsky Competition
  • Saint-Petersburg International Cultural Forum
  • Moscow International Education Salon
  • International Championship «Worldskills»

Back to Top


5. TURKEY

There have been several developments: The General Migration Directorate (MD) is eliminating postal filing of residence permit renewal applications. Turkey has increased efforts to attract foreign investment. Foreigners must now obtain “E-devlet” online accounts to obtain certain documents and information.

Elimination of Postal Filings of Residence Permit Renewals

Further to this end, the MD has closed its office in Bakirkoy, Istanbul, which had been the only office designated to handle postal renewal applications of residence permits in Istanbul. According to officers there, renewal applications already received will be transferred to the Vatan (Istanbul) main office.

Practitioners say this is a surprising development, as it appears to be a step to significantly alter the way renewal applications are handled. They recommend not pursuing postal renewal applications and instead filing new initial applications via interview to extend residence permits.

Details (Turkish): Istanbul government site

Increased Efforts to Attract Foreign Investment

Turkey wishes to increase foreign investment, so has “jumped on the bandwagon” to utilize immigration laws to do so. Regarding residency through investment, Turkey has a category of residence permit based on real estate investment, but this category is rarely used because the benefit over other residence permit categories is minimal. Most foreigners can qualify for a short-term residence permit without an investment in real estate or a business.

Turkey’s citizenship regulations allow those wishing to pursue Turkish citizenship to do so under several categories, such as capital investments, government debt instruments, investing in a business that employs 50 Turkish nationals, and venture capital investments. The threshold amounts required for investment were lowered in 2019, and real estate investments as low as US $250,000 now qualify. Clearly, investment in real estate has captured interest internationally because the threshold amount in Turkey is lower than for most other investment citizenship programs.

Citizenship by investment is a five-step process: (1) obtaining a Valuation Report, (2) issuance of a Certificate of Compliance, (3) filing a Residence Permit application, (4) filing address registration, and (5) filing a citizenship application. For those applicants who have already purchased a qualifying real property or made another qualifying investment, the process from valuation report to citizenship grant can be as little as 6 months.

New Requirement for E-devlet Accounts for Foreigners

The Populations Registry has stated that foreigners must obtain an “E-devlet” account to obtain certain documents and information, such as renewed address registrations. The Populations Registry will no longer issue renewed address registration confirmations in person. Foreigners must now obtain a renewed address registration online via E-devlet as Turkish nationals do.

E-devlet is an online system maintained by the Interior Ministry that allows individuals in Turkey to have access to much of their personal information generated by various Turkish government agencies. The E-devlet system includes the account-holder’s Turkey-related information such as address registration, police and court background, Social Security records, retirement information, tax records, property ownership, and educational degree information. In general, information related to non-Turkey institutions or agencies is not included.

A foreigner with a Turkish ID number may obtain an E-devlet account by visiting a local PTT (Turkish post office) with his or her work permit card and requesting issuance of a password. Upon issuance of a password, the assignee uses it to log into the E-devlet system and create an account. Unfortunately, the E-devlet website is only in the Turkish language, and the PTT officers rarely speak any language other than Turkish. Therefore, most foreign assignees will need assistance.

Back to Top


6. UNITED KINGDOM

Eligible nationals of the United States and six other countries can now use electronic passport control gates when they enter the United Kingdom (UK).

The new electronic passport control system is intended to speed entry to the UK for people traveling on business or for tourism. In addition to nationals of the United States, e-gates are now open to passport holders of Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, and South Korea.

Business travelers and their employers are advised to bear in mind that the same restrictions apply to people entering as visitors regardless of whether they are stamped in by an Immigration Officer or use an e-gate. Visitors are not allowed to work or study in the UK except in very limited circumstances. They also cannot live in the UK for extended periods.

The Home Office already collects entry and exit data from airlines and other carriers taking people to and from the UK. Anyone using e-gates can also expect to have their movements tracked. If a visitor appears to be spending most of their time in the UK, they will run into trouble, whether or not they use e-gates.

Details: Immigration Update

Back to Top


7. New Publications and Items of Interest

Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers:

  • The latest immigration news is at https://www.abil.com/news.cfm.
  • The latest published media releases include:
    • ABIL Says Proposed Change to Public Charge Rule Would Exclude Immigrants from Government Programs
    • New Data Show Increase in H-1B Denials and RFEs
    • ABIL Urges Administration to Change “Buy American and Hire American” Executive Order
    • ABIL Member Kuck Baxter Immigration Commercial Nominated for an Emmy
    • ABIL Members Note Immigration Threats for Employers in 2018
  • ABIL is available on Twitter: @ABILImmigration.
  • Recent ABIL member blogs are at http://www.abilblog.com/.

Back to Top


8. ABIL Member / Firm News

In Chambers USA 2019, a guide to leading lawyers in the United States:

  • 25 ABIL lawyers were ranked in the top bands
  • ABIL lawyers represent half of the top-ranked (“Band 1”) attorneys in immigration

This means that an Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers (ABIL) lawyer is over 15 times more likely to be ranked in the top band than the average immigration attorney. More information

Several members of ABIL have authored articles for the inaugural AILA Law Journal, a publication of the American Immigration Lawyers Association:

  • Kehrela Hodkinson, “Renunciation of U.S. Citizenship: Why Would a Client ‘Give It All Up?’ “
  • Cyrus Mehta, “The Curse of Kazarian v. USCIS in Extraordinary Ability Adjudications Under the Employment-Based First Preference”
  • Angelo Paparelli, “USCIS’s Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate: Less Legitimate Than Inspector Clouseau, But Without the Savoir Faire“

All three of the ABIL members listed above are also on the publication’s Board of Editors, along with William Stock, of Klasko Immigration Law Partners, LLP. The publication

Dagmar Butte was quoted by Wired in “Visa Rejections for Tech Workers Spike Under Trump.” Ms. Butte said she began noticing a spike in denials shortly after President Trump took office. In 2017, she said, she filed numerous applications on behalf of one IT client, only to have them all rejected, a first in her nearly three-decade career. “I thought: Did I suddenly get stupid?”, she said. In her experience, the article notes, the H-1B visa holders who have been hardest hit are systems analysts and quality assurance analysts employed through outsourcing firms. These applicants are increasingly being told that their jobs are not considered specialized, although those determinations appear to be applied unevenly, she noted. In one instance, she filed 16 applications for systems analysts; all had the same expertise and educational attainment but two were denied. Ms. Butte noted that it would have been dangerous to challenge the denials on the basis that other similarly skilled applicants were approved. “If I were to point that out, they would not approve the two denied cases; they would just reopen and deny the 14 approved cases,” she noted, adding that this has happened to some of her firm’s clients. “When the denials come, it’s devastating. They leave everything behind.” The article

Ms. Butte was quoted by Recode in “New Immigration Rules Could Prevent Our Next Elon Musk.” The article notes that although Silicon Valley is focused more on experience and entrepreneurship than on advanced degrees, USCIS is actively increasing the percentage of master’s degree candidates selected for the H-1B program. Ms. Butte noted that “[t]ech companies spend a lot of time looking at skill sets which may or may not be tied to a degree. Usually they are experiential as opposed to being part of an advanced degree.”

Laura Devine Solicitors won several awards recently:

  • Immigration Law Firm of the Year award by Citywealth Magic Circle Awards. Details
  • Corporate Immigration Lawyer of the Year (Laura Devine) by Who’s Who Legal. Details
  • Commendation for immigration by The Times Best Law Firms.

Ronald Klasko, of Klasko Immigration Law Partners, LLP, has authored a new blog entry on the immigration law ramifications of unlawful presence litigation. A positive development in unlawful presence litigation occurred this week when Judge Loretta C. Biggs rejected the government’s Motion to Dismiss. Her decision also enjoins the implementation of USCIS’s unlawful presence policy issued on August 9, 2018, nationwide because of the “likelihood of success” of the plaintiffs’ challenges. Mr. Klasko, co-counsel and an immigration subject matter expert on this litigation, provides background on the issue, the ramifications of this decision, and what it means for affected institutions and foreign nationals. Additionally, he examines the nationwide impact of this decision and what that means for a litigation strategy on other issues of significant importance.

Klasko Immigration Law Partners, LLP, announced that the final installment in its blog series, “Strategies for Success Series: Analyzing AAO Decisions,” is available now. The is titled, “.” The second blog in the series was “”. The first blog in the series was ”
”

Mr. Mehta has authored several new blog entries: “Making the Case for Expanding a Foreign National’s Interest in an I-140 Petition“; “”; “”; “Are the Canadian and U.S. Refugee/Asylum Processes Really ‘Similar Enough’? How the New Refugee Bar in Bill C-97 Is Based on a Misunderstanding of U.S. Asylum Law“; and “Is the USCIS Improving or Undermining the Immigration System Through Its Top Ten Ways?”

Sophia Genovese, of Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners PLLC, has authored a new blog entry, “G Barr Cannot Ignore the Constitution: The AG’s Latest Attack on Asylum Seekers in Matter of M-S-“.

David Isaacson, of Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners PLLC, has authored a new blog entry, “Challenges to Expedited Removal Orders Against Returning Nonimmigrants: How Recent Case Law Supports Habeas Petitions Even After Removal.”

Cyrus Mehta and Rebekah Kim co-authored a new blog entry, “Questions Arising From Foreign Entity Changes After an L-1 Petition is Approved.”

Mr. Paparelli has authored a new blog entry, “Immigration Haunting: Social Security Administration Resumes Issuing No-Match Notices.”

Rodrigu Tannus has authored several new articles in Diario la Republica:

  • “Beneficios migratorios de acuerdos comerciales“
  • “Reforma migratoria en Colombia“

Stephen Yale-Loehr was quoted in various publications regarding President Trump’s legal immigration reform plan:

  • Time.com: “It would be a big departure from our current system. Right now two-thirds of all immigrants who are admitted are based on some kind of family characteristic.”
  • Daily Mail (UK)
  • Agence France Presse (AFP): many publications, including this article
  • Hindustan Times
  • Business Recorder
  • Business Insider

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by the Associated Press in “Border Patrol Expands Fingerprinting of Migrant Children,” which was published in many outlets. “DHS may claim that they can get around this bar [against taking biometric data from children] by getting parental permission, but that interpretation is subject to court challenge. To do this legally, DHS needs to go through the rulemaking process to change the regulation.”

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Mercury News in “South Bay Pair Gamed EB-5 Visa Program for Millions in Profit from Wealthy Investors.” Mr. Yale-Loehr noted that the United States issues 10,000 EB-5 green cards each year. Most go to investors’ family members, he said, but that still leaves thousands of investors who each pour at least $500,000 into U.S. companies. “You can do the math — that’s a lot of money that helps, or at least can help, stimulate the U.S. economy and create jobs for U.S. workers. But it is complex and it has to be done well.” Congress reauthorized the EB-5 program through September 2019. Mr. Yale-Loehr noted that as the expiration date approaches each year, “Congress talks about revamping the EB-5 program,” but then “the political gridlock sets up and they can’t get an agreement on substantive changes, so they kick the can down the road.”

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by the Guardian in “Trump Administration Moves Spark Fears of New Immigration Crackdown.” He noted that without action by Congress, which has declined to join Trump in most of his immigration initiatives, the administration’s legal options for altering policy are limited. The fastest way to accelerate the deportation of asylum seekers could be by expanding expedited removal, which could allow removals of migrants within 100 miles of the border up to 14 days after crossing. “But they would have to do that through a rule – they couldn’t just announce it. And so it would take some time to go through the rulemaking process.” He added, ” This administration doesn’t seem to have a coherent policy. It seems that the president simply wants to score political points by seeming to be tough on immigration without really thinking through the best way to get to the root cause of why people are fleeing violence in Central American countries to come to the United States. The rules are already stacked against immigrants trying to stay in the United States, and this administration is trying to make it even harder but without thinking through the consequences.”

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Syracuse.com in “Path for International Basketball Players at Syracuse Requires Patience, Hope.” The article notes that embassy officials want to ascertain whether students will return to their home countries once they complete their educations. “That can be either easy or hard to prove depending on what country you’re coming from. We usually give the benefit of the doubt to Canadians and say, ‘I think you will go back.’ If it’s an African country, it may be very hard to get a student visa because the consular office does not think the person really plans on going back.”

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted in several publications regarding President Trump’s threat to close the U.S. border with Mexico:

  • CNN: Mr. Yale-Loehr noted that the President would run into problems if he closed the entire border to green card holders and U.S. citizens: “They could argue that doing so violates their First Amendment rights to freedom of association and travel.”
  • Univision (Spanish): “Las amenazas de Trump en la frontera y el corte de la ayuda a los países centroamericanos (como castigo por no detener las oleadas de inmigrantes en busca de asilo) pueden ser ilegales y, desde luego, una tontería.”
  • Sinclair Broadcast Group, many newspapers: “Any effort to close the U.S.-Mexico border or cut off aid is doomed to failure. It is like stopping funding for cancer research on the theory that fewer cancers will occur. We need more foreign aid, not less, to attack the root conditions of poverty and violence in Central America so fewer people in those countries will flee to the United States.”
  • Law360: Mr. Yale-Loehr noted that the first version of President Trump’s travel ban raised similar concerns. If the President issued a narrower proclamation closing the border only for asylum-seekers, they could argue that this violates INA 208(a)(1), which provides that any migrant physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States, whether or not at a designated port of arrival, can apply for asylum. Content available by registering or subscribing.
  • USA Today: “We’d be shooting ourselves in the foot by closing the border. It’s like stopping funding for cancer research on the theory that we’ll get fewer cancers.”
  • Business Insider: “The legal challenges to a border declaration will depend on what President Trump does. If President Trump closed the border to green card holders and U.S. citizens, they could argue that doing so violates their First Amendment rights to freedom of association and travel.”

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by WENY regarding a failed EB-5 project in upstate New York.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Bloomberg Law regarding a 10 percent immigration surcharge proposal in the Trump administration’s budget request to Congress. It “seems minimal,” he noted, but “would have a real detrimental impact on many people who can ill afford these increased filing fees.” He said the surcharge is likely “dead on arrival,” noting that even the Trump administration thinks “that such a change will only occur with congressional approval” and “the Democrats would never agree to this.” Further, he noted, “Some employers already are balking at the high filing fees for needed employees. Adding a 10 percent surcharge will make it even more financially onerous. We may see fewer H-1B petitions being filed as a result.” Content is available by registering or subscribing.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Voice of San Diego in an article about a California county’s asylum policy lawsuit. Mr. Yale-Loehr agreed that the federal government’s failure to follow rulemaking procedures was the county lawsuit’s most potent argument. “I think it’s a good lawsuit and they raise serious allegations. We’ll just have to wait to see which judge they get.”

 

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2019-06-28 11:01:032023-08-14 14:10:45ABIL Global Update • June 2019

ABIL Global Update • April 2019

April 15, 2019/in Global Immigration Update /by ABIL


Headlines

1. DOCUMENT RETENTION POLICIES AND PRACTICES: AN OVERVIEW -This article provides an overview of document retention policies and practices in Canada and Italy.

2. COLOMBIA -This article summarizes several developments in Colombia: All visa procedures must now be completed online; the Migrant Mercosur visa for Chilean nationals has been suspended due to a lack of reciprocity; there has been a breakdown of diplomatic relations between Colombia and Venezuela that has affected migratory processes; and there are new conditions for Venezuelans traveling to Colombia with expired passports.

3. EUROPEAN UNION -As part of “red tape” reduction for European Union (EU) citizens living or working in another Member State, the apostille is no longer required on public documents issued by EU authorities.

4. FRANCE -A government order has established the rights of United Kingdom (UK) nationals continuing to stay in France in case of a “hard Brexit.”

5. ITALY -A new decree outlines measures that will apply if the UK leaves the EU without a deal.

6. UNITED KINGDOM -This article provides updates on the fast-changing Brexit situation. Also, new “e-gates” are now open to U.S. citizens and others.

7. New Publications and Items of Interest -New Publications and Items of Interest

8. ABIL Member / Firm News -ABIL Member / Firm News


Details:

1. DOCUMENT RETENTION POLICIES AND PRACTICES: AN OVERVIEW

This article provides an overview of document retention policies and practices in Canada and Italy.

Canada

In Canada, rules related to law firms retaining client documents and information are governed by provincial and territorial law societies. Accordingly, there are potentially 13 different sets of professional rules of conduct that govern document retention. Generally speaking, the provincial and territorial law societies will not set a firm rule but instead will make a recommendation for a best practice. In Ontario, lawyers are advised to keep client documents for 7 years, except Trust Account documents, which must be kept for 10 years. Trust Accounts are used in Canada to receive client fees in advance of work being completed and can also be used to hold client funds pending the completion of commercial or real estate transactions where the funds are applied to the purchase price. For this reason, lawyers are held to a higher standard of record-keeping for all documentation dealing with the handling of client funds. The Canada Revenue Agency also requires that businesses keep tax records for 7 years.

Recently, there have been a number of government initiatives and changes in legislation related to compliance with respect to immigration applications to support hiring foreign workers in Canada. These include Administrative Monetary Penalties against employers for non-compliance. Businesses that hire foreign workers must keep records related to the hiring and employment of the foreign worker, including copies of work permits, payroll documents, job descriptions, and timesheets for up to 6 years from the date of hire. In light of this requirement, immigration law firms providing legal services to businesses that hire foreign workers should also be keeping records for at least 6 years.

Italy

In Italy, an attorney must collect and store only the data that are necessary (not superfluous) for the achievement of the client’s objectives.

The data can be deleted or returned at the client’s request. There is no mandatory requirement to keep data for a certain time, unless it is necessary for the file’s completion. However, lawyers are subject to malpractice claims for 10 years, and it is therefore advisable to keep the necessary data and documents until the expiration of the statute of limitation for a possible claim.

Regarding immigration-related documents, the law does not set forth a specific term, but considering that immigration compliance is also linked to tax and social security issues, it is advisable to store documents for at least 7 years, the statute of limitation for any tax claims.

Back to Top


2. COLOMBIA

COLOMBIA

This article summarizes several developments in Colombia: All visa procedures must now be completed online; the Migrant Mercosur visa for Chilean nationals has been suspended due to a lack of reciprocity; there has been a breakdown of diplomatic relations between Colombia and Venezuela that has affected migratory processes; and there are new conditions for Venezuelans traveling to Colombia with expired passports.

Changes in the Visa Application Process

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has announced that all visa procedures must now be completed online. Foreign nationals can only approach the Ministry when they are summoned by the authority or when they have received approval of their visa and they need the visa sticker stamped on the passport.

This change will affect processing times for all visas, Visitor (V), Migrant (M), and Resident (R), taking into consideration that in the past a visa could be obtained in person in a couple of hours. It will now be necessary to obtain approval of the application online, which takes approximately five business days.

Mercosur Visa Temporarily Suspended for Chilean Nationals

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has suspended the issuance of the Migrant Mercosur visa for Chilean nationals. This decision was made due to the failure to apply the principle of reciprocity, because the Mercosur visa is not being issued for Colombian nationals in Chile.

Chilean nationals who are in the process of obtaining a Mercosur visa and continue to have a need to enter Colombia must reevaluate the existing migratory alternatives and proceed with a request for a different type of visa to enter and remain in the country in regular migratory status.

However, for foreign nationals who still hold a visa in this category, its validity will be respected and they should not make any changes at this time.

Breakdown of Diplomatic Relations Between Colombia and Venezuela and Its Impact on Migratory Processes

Due to the breakdown of diplomatic relations between Colombia and Venezuela, consular services in both countries have stopped and no further requests will be processed until further notice.

To provide an avenue for the migration of Venezuelan nationals to Colombia, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has enabled its online platform for Venezuelans who wish to apply for a Colombian visa so they can proceed with their request.

On the other hand, Colombian nationals who require a visa or other processes through any Venezuelan consulate in Colombia will need to wait for these offices to resume their normal activities. They may wish to consider searching for an alternative, even if that will mean the process is completed in Venezuela or before a consulate abroad.

New Conditions for Venezuelans Traveling to Colombia with Expired Passports

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has authorized Venezuelan nationals to enter, transit through, and leave the national territory of Colombia, even when their passports have expired. Passports in this condition may continue to be used for two years from the due date.

Likewise, Venezuelan passport holders under the conditions mentioned above may receive an Entry and Stay Permit granted by Migración Colombia upon entering the country. Exceptionally, those passports with an entry stamp will be valid as identification documents in the national territory of Colombia.

For visa processes, the Ministry has established that Venezuelan nationals who are holders of expired passports may request the issuance of a visa as long as it complies with the other provisions in force for the issuance of the corresponding visa.

Back to Top


3. EUROPEAN UNION

EUROPEAN UNION

As part of “red tape” reduction for European Union (EU) citizens living or working in another Member State, the apostille is no longer required on public documents issued by EU authorities.

As of February 16, 2019, the entry into force of Regulation 2016/1191 simplifies the circulation of certain public documents in the EU. A number of bureaucratic procedures will no longer be necessary when presenting public documents issued in one EU country to the authorities of another EU country.

Remarkably, public documents issued by the authorities of an EU country must now be accepted without the need of an apostille (authenticity stamp). Also, the regulation simplifies the rules concerning translation requirements.

A European Commission press release on this topic is available here.

Back to Top


4. FRANCE

FRANCE

A government order has established the rights of United Kingdom (UK) nationals continuing to stay in France after March 29, 2019, in case of a “hard Brexit.”

The French government published an order determining the right of UK nationals continuing to stay in France after the Brexit date of March 29, 2019, in the most probable event of no exit agreement being reached between the UK and the European Union (EU). Such UK nationals will be allowed three to 12 months to acquire permanent residency if they have been in France for five years or more as of March 30, 2019, or acquire the appropriate permit to stay, if they have been in France as of that date for less than five years. [Update: The EU has given the UK another six months to leave the EU, to October 31, 2019.]

Ordonnance n° 2019-76 of 6 February 2019 was published in the Journal Officiel on February 7. The following are the principal terms affecting the immigration rights of UK nationals.

A transition period of 3 to 12 months. UK nationals continuing their stay and professional activities beyond the Brexit date may do so, as before such date, for a minimum period of three months from the Brexit date. A decree will be published that will set the final end date of the transition, which will be within 12 months of the Brexit date. Beyond this final end date, UK nationals must be in possession of the appropriate permits covering their stay and professional activities in France (Article 1 of the Order).

Presence of less than five years. UK nationals having resided for less than five years as of the Brexit date must apply for the various permits to stay according to their status (e.g., student, employee, temporary worker, posted worker, independent professional, unemployment beneficiary, family member, long-term visitor). Such permits, when allowing work, will not be conditioned on labor market tests (Article 2).

Presence of five years or more. UK nationals having resided for five years or more in France as of the Brexit date will be entitled to the Residency Card, with 10-year validity (Article 3).

UK nationals practicing law in France. UK nationals who exercise the profession of lawyer (avocat) in France, based on their EU rights, may continue to do so for a period of 12 months from the Brexit date. Such lawyers may benefit from the disposition of Article 89 of the law of 31 December 1971 (Article 13).

Article 89 of the law of 31 December 1971 facilitates the registration of foreign lawyers with a French bar association after showing that they “effectively and regularly practiced French law on [French] national territory for a period of at least 3 years.” Such activity must be demonstrated to the French bar association with which the foreign lawyer wishes to register. If over the three-year period the practice of French law was for a shorter period, the bar association will have discretion to determine if the foreign lawyer can practice French law.

Subsidiaries of law firms formed under UK law and registered with a French bar association on the Brexit date may continue to pursue their activities in France beyond that date, even if no lawyer registered under a UK qualification is still practicing within that structure. No new structure under UK law may be created in France after the Brexit date (Article 16).

Reciprocity required. The Order states that the preferential treatment provided for UK nationals can be suspended by a State Council decree, after three months following the Brexit date, if the French government observes that the UK government has not taken equivalent dispositions toward French nationals (Article 19).

Other areas. The 10-page order is quite dense. It touches on many areas (such as recognition of professional qualifications, cross-border service provision, welfare, health coverage, and jobs reserved for French and EU nationals). A decree to implement this order will soon be published.

Back to Top


5. ITALY

ITALY

A new decree outlines measures that will apply if the UK leaves the EU without a deal.

With Decree 25 March 2019, n. 22, the Italian government has outlined the measures that will apply if the United Kingdom (UK) leaves the European Union (EU) without a deal. In particular, article 14 refers to the residency rights of UK nationals and their non-EU family members living in Italy, and article 15 refers to citizenship applications.

UK citizens residing in Italy and their non-EU family members can apply for EU residence permits for long-term residents by December 31, 2020, if upon the date of Brexit they have regularly resided in Italy for at least five years. UK citizens residing in Italy and their non-EU family members can apply for EU residence permits “for residency” (per residenza), valid for five years, if upon the date of Brexit they have regularly resided in Italy for less than five years.

Starting on January 1, 2021, UK citizens and their non-EU family members who do not comply with these provisions will be subject to the same sanctions applicable to all noncompliant non-EU nationals.

UK citizens who are regularly residing in Italy for at least four years upon the date of Brexit can apply for Italian citizenship until December 31, 2020. Applications filed after that date will be processed under the same regulations applicable to all other non-EU nationals.

Back to Top


6. UNITED KINGDOM

UNITED KINGDOM

This article provides updates as of press time on the fast-changing Brexit situation. Also, new “e-gates” are now open to U.S. citizens and others.

Brexit Update: EU Extends Deadline to October 31

In a tumultuous period for British politics, the House of Commons rejected Prime Minister (PM) Theresa May’s Brexit deal for a second time on March 12, 2019, by a wide margin of 149 votes. The following day, in a legally non-binding but politically significant motion, Parliament rejected leaving the EU without a Withdrawal Agreement and a Framework for the Future Relationship.

On March 14, House members rejected a series of amendments to the UK government’s motion to extend Article 50. The first amendment to hold a second referendum was overwhelmingly defeated 334 to 85 (with the Labour party abstaining from the vote). The second, to enable the House to debate on the next steps in Brexit on March 20, was narrowly rejected 314 to 312. And the third amendment, which would have instructed the PM to request additional time from the EU in order to find a majority of support for an alternative approach, also failed to garner enough support in a vote of 318 to 302.

Among other things, following the amendments’ defeat, the House passed the government’s motion to extend Article 50 until June 30, 2019, by a wide margin of 412 in favor to 202 against. Subsequently, the EU extended the Brexit deadline to October 31, 2019, giving the UK another six months. As of press time, there was a range of potential future scenarios and the outcome was far from certain. The UK remains a member of the EU for the time being, but the ongoing uncertainty has created problems for businesses and investors in the UK. Stay tuned.

E-Gates

As of March 11, 2019, nationals of the United States and six other countries (Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, and South Korea) can now use electronic passport control gates when they enter the UK. People from these countries who do not already have a visa will automatically be granted entry as a standard visitor for six months, with the usual prohibition on employment and recourse to public funds.

The new system was announced in October 2018, and the legislation enabling it was passed in February 2019.

At the moment, electronic passport control gates—known as e-gates or ePassport gates—can be used by British and EU nationals aged 12 and over.

The following groups of people should not use e-gates:

  • People who are entering the UK for the first time on a different type of visa, such as a spouse visa. These people must get their visa stamped by an Immigration Officer the first time they enter the UK.
  • People who do not have a visa and are seeking entry for a different purpose; for example, under the Tier 5 (Temporary Worker) Creative and Sporting category or the Visitor (Permitted Paid Engagements) category. These people must see an Immigration Officer and ask to be stamped in under the appropriate category.
  • People who have had immigration problems in the UK and are hoping to slip in without being questioned. Passengers using e-gates are checked against Border Force systems. If the person is flagged on these systems, the gate will not open and they will be taken aside for questioning.

The new system will make entry to the UK much quicker for people traveling on business or for tourism.

Business travelers and their employers should bear in mind that the same restrictions apply to people entering as visitors regardless of whether they are stamped in by an Immigration Officer or use an e-gate. Visitors are not allowed to work or study in the UK except in very limited circumstances. They also cannot live in the UK for extended periods. The Home Office already collects entry and exit data from airlines and other carriers taking people to and from the UK. Anyone using e-gates can also expect to have their movements tracked. Visitors who appear to be spending most of their time in the UK will run into trouble, whether or not they use e-gates.

Back to Top


7. New Publications and Items of Interest

Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers:

  • The latest immigration news is at https://www.abil.com/news.cfm.
  • The latest published media releases include:
    • ABIL Says Proposed Change to Public Charge Rule Would Exclude Immigrants from Government Programs
    • New Data Show Increase in H-1B Denials and RFEs
    • ABIL Urges Administration to Change “Buy American and Hire American” Executive Order
    • ABIL Member Kuck Baxter Immigration Commercial Nominated for an Emmy
    • ABIL Members Note Immigration Threats for Employers in 2018
  • ABIL is available on Twitter: @ABILImmigration.
  • Recent ABIL member blogs are at http://www.abilblog.com/.

Back to Top


8. ABIL Member / Firm News

The Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers (ABIL) was named the top immigration legal network by Chambers Global. Chambers noted, “[ABIL] is an association of legal providers based in over 20 countries, including 24 U.S. cities, providing a single contact point for management of global immigration needs. It assists with processing, filing, invoicing and online client case tracking. Members share information on important legislation, take part in joint training and collaborate on projects to provide a unified service offering. The network also maintains an up-to-date blog collating information on multiple jurisdictions.” In addition, ABIL members and firms were disproportionately top-rated in almost all of their jurisdictions relative to other immigration firms. ABIL encompasses two-thirds of Chambers USA’s top band (ranking tier) in California out of thousands of California immigration law firms.

Below are ABIL firms and individual members and associates who were honored in Chambers Global and Chambers USA:

FIRMS

United States

Cyrus D Mehta & Associates PLLC

Foster, LLP

Fredrikson & Byron

Klasko Rulon Stock & Seltzer

Kuck Baxter

Maggio & Kattar

Miller Mayer

Parker, Butte Lane

Pearl Law Group

Seyfarth Shaw

Siskind Susser, PC

Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP

 

Canada

Corporate Immigration Law Firm

Gomberg Dalfen

 

Global

Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers

Laura Devine Solicitors

Bener Law Office (Europe, Global – for Corporate/M&A)

Dorda (Europe, Global, High Net Worth)

Kingsley Napley (UK, US, Global, High Net Worth)

Laura Devine Solicitors (UK, US, Global, High Net Worth)

Sagardoy Abogados (Europe – for Employment)

Raczkowski Paruch (Europe – for Employment)

Tannus & Asociados (Latin America)

INDIVIDUALS

United States

Jim Alexander

Robert Aronson (US and Global)

Dagmar Butte

Charles Foster

David Fullmer

Anna Gallagher

  1. Ronald Klasko (US and Global)

Charles Kuck (US and Global)

Judy Lee

Cyrus Mehta (US and Global)

John Meyer

Christy Nguyen

Angelo Paparelli

Julie Pearl

Jan Pederson

Gregory Siskind (US and Global)

Jennifer Stevens (US and Global)

William Stock

Anastasia Tonello

Bernard Wolfsdorf

Stephen Yale-Loehr (US and Global)

 

Canada

Jean-Philippe Brunet

Barbara Jo Caruso

Seth Dalfen

Avi Gomberg

 

Global (see also individual listings above under United States)

Sophie Barrett-Brown

Ilda de Sousa

Laura Devine

Nicolas Rollason

Jennifer Stevens

Rodrigo Tannus

More information on rankings and areas of specialty are available here. Bios of ABIL members are available at https://www.abil.com/.

 

Robert Aronson and Debra Schneider, of Fredrikson & Byron, P.A., have co-authored “A Bridge Over Troubled Waters: The High-Skilled Worker Rule and Its Impact on Employment-Based Immigration,” published in 44 Mitchell Hamline L. Rev. 935-969 (2018) and available online here.

Dagmar Butte will be speaking at the following events:

  • AILA Rome Chapter Conference in Berlin, Germany, on April 30, 2019, on the effect of marijuana legalization at the state level on federal immigration law
  • Federal Bar Association National Conference in Austin, Texas, on May 17, 2019, on “Fundamentals of Business Immigration Law”
  • American Immigration Lawyers Association Annual Conference in Orlando, Florida, on June 19, 2019, on “Changes to Immigration Law Via Trump Administration Memos”
  • Chair of Business Track for AILA Annual Conference in Orlando (see above)

Laura Devine Solicitors has won the LexisNexis 2019 Award for Wellbeing. The award recognizes the law firm or other legal organization that “has demonstrated the strongest commitment to providing or promoting a working environment that supports the mental and physical health of its staff, members or colleagues and enables them to maintain a healthy balance between their work pressures and home life.” Details

Robert Loughran, partner at Foster LLP, recently spoke on a panel in Austin, Texas, at the South by Southwest (SXSW) Conference. “How Foreign Entrepreneurs Thrive in Trump’s America: It’s (Not So) Complicated” focused on the immigration, corporate, and financial/tax implications foreign entrepreneurs face when setting up a business in Texas and the United States in light of the Trump administration’s new immigration policies. More information

Mr. Loughran and Matthew Myers presented on U.S. immigration considerations specific to Japanese investors, companies, and employees, to representatives of 19 Japanese companies visiting San Antonio, Texas, as part of an economic development delegation at a dinner hosted by the San Antonio Economic Development Foundation. The event took place March 7, 2019.

Charles Foster and John Meyer, chairman and partner, respectively, at Foster LLP, attended the EB-5 & Uglobal Immigration Expo hosted by EB-5 Investors Magazine on February 11, 2019, in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Mr. Foster presented an overview of the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program and its latest developments to representatives of leading EB-5 regional centers, migration agencies, and potential investors. More information

Mr. Foster delivered the keynote address at the immigration seminar, “Struggling With Your Immigration Status: Is Canada a Solution?,” hosted by The Aga Khan Economic Planning Board and Indo-American Chamber of Commerce of Greater Houston on December 15, 2018, in Houston, Texas. Mr. Foster spoke about the EB-5 Investment Program as a possible alternative to the H-1B visa backlog. More information on this event

Mr. Meyer was a guest speaker for “Investing and Doing Business in Texas,” an event hosted by Invierta en USA on January 30, 2019, in Mexico City, Mexico. Mr. Meyer spoke about the EB-5 Immigration Investor Program concerning how to obtain business and investment visas to immigrate to the United States. The audience included Mexican entrepreneurs who want to invest in, establish, and expand businesses in Texas. More information

Klasko Immigration Law Partners, LLP, has released “,” which is Episode 12 of the podcast series, “Statutes of Liberty.”

Anu Nair, of Klasko Immigration Law Partners, LLP, served as a panelist for “U.S. Immigration and IRS Update,” a Business After Hours event sponsored by Gray Robinson Attorneys at Law and hosted by the Indian American Chamber of Commerce on January 15, 2019, in Orlando, Florida. She provided an overview of the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program and spoke on the latest developments. She included an update on the impending visa backlog for Indian foreign nationals. More information

Charles Kuck is the attorney for Grammy-nominated rapper 21 Savage, whose real name is She’yaa Bin Abraham-Joseph. Mr. Abraham-Joseph, who was born in England in 1992 and has been living in the United States since the age of seven, was detained recently on immigration charges by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Atlanta, Georgia. Mr. Kuck was quoted by Reuters in “Rapper 21 Savage Being Held Unfairly, Attorneys Claim.” Mr. Kuck noted that “ICE has not charged Mr. Abraham-Joseph with any crime. As a minor, his family overstayed their work visas, and he, like almost two million other children, was left without legal status through no fault of his own.” He said, “This is a civil law violation, and the continued detention of Mr. Abraham-Joseph serves no other purpose than to unnecessarily punish him and try to intimidate him into giving up his right to fight to remain in the United States.” Mr. Kuck also said that ICE was refusing to release his client on bond based on “incorrect information about prior criminal charges.” The article. Additional details of Mr. Abraham-Joseph’s case are at TMZ, NYTimes, The New Yorker, Time, and Rolling Stone.

Cyrus Mehta has authored several new blog entries. “The Best Way for Trump to Offer “Love and Sympathy’ is to Repeal the Muslim Ban“; “Advancing a ‘Social Group Plus’ Claim After Matter of A-B-“; “”; and “Don’t Always Suck Up to Buy American Hire American.”

David Isaacson, of Cyrus Mehta‘s office, has authored a new blog entry. “.”

Angelo Paparelli has authored a new blog entry, ” .”

Mr. Paparelli and William Stock spoke at the 2019 American Immigration Lawyers Association’s Spring Federal Court Litigation Conference in Chicago, Illinois, on March 12, 2019. More information

Rodrigo Tannus has authored several new articles published in Diario la Republica:

  • “Golden Visa“
  • “Nacionalización colombiana y sus efectos“
  • “Permiso de ingreso y permanencia de tránsito temporal“

Stephen Yale-Loehr was quoted in several publications regarding President Trump’s threat to close the U.S. border with Mexico:

  • CNN: Mr. Yale-Loehr noted that the President would run into problems if he closed the entire border to green card holders and U.S. citizens: “They could argue that doing so violates their First Amendment rights to freedom of association and travel.”
  • Univision (Spanish): “Las amenazas de Trump en la frontera y el corte de la ayuda a los países centroamericanos (como castigo por no detener las oleadas de inmigrantes en busca de asilo) pueden ser ilegales y, desde luego, una tontería.”
  • Sinclair Broadcast Group, many newspapers: “Any effort to close the U.S.-Mexico border or cut off aid is doomed to failure. It is like stopping funding for cancer research on the theory that fewer cancers will occur. We need more foreign aid, not less, to attack the root conditions of poverty and violence in Central America so fewer people in those countries will flee to the United States.”
  • Law360: Mr. Yale-Loehr noted that the first version of President Trump’s travel ban raised similar concerns. If the President issued a narrower proclamation closing the border only for asylum-seekers, they could argue that this violates INA 208(a)(1), which provides that any migrant physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States, whether or not at a designated port of arrival, can apply for asylum. Available by registering or subscribing.
  • USA Today: “We’d be shooting ourselves in the foot by closing the border. It’s like stopping funding for cancer research on the theory that we’ll get fewer cancers.”
  • Business Insider: “The legal challenges to a border declaration will depend on what President Trump does. If President Trump closed the border to green card holders and U.S. citizens, they could argue that doing so violates their First Amendment rights to freedom of association and travel.”

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by WENY regarding a failed EB-5 project in upstate New York.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Bloomberg Law regarding a 10 percent immigration surcharge proposal in the Trump administration’s budget request to Congress. It “seems minimal,” he noted, but “would have a real detrimental impact on many people who can ill afford these increased filing fees.” He said the surcharge is likely “dead on arrival,” noting that even the Trump administration thinks “that such a change will only occur with congressional approval” and “the Democrats would never agree to this.” Further, he noted, “Some employers already are balking at the high filing fees for needed employees. Adding a 10 percent surcharge will make it even more financially onerous. We may see fewer H-1B petitions being filed as a result.” Available by registering or subscribing.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Voice of San Diego in an article about a California county’s asylum policy lawsuit. Mr. Yale-Loehr agreed that the federal government’s failure to follow rulemaking procedures was the county lawsuit’s most potent argument. “I think it’s a good lawsuit and they raise serious allegations. We’ll just have to wait to see which judge they get.”

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by CNN in “Supreme Court Will Take Up Immigration-Related Case Next Term.” The case, Kansas v. Garcia, concerns Kansas’ prosecution of three immigrants for using stolen Social Security numbers for employment. The Kansas Supreme Court overturned their convictions, ruling that federal immigration law preempts a state from prosecuting undocumented immigrants when the claim is based on information culled from federal immigration forms. If the Supreme Court takes up the case and overturns the Kansas court’s decision, he noted, “all states could prosecute noncitizens for identity theft more easily. The Supreme Court largely struck down Arizona’s similar efforts in 2012. Given the change in Supreme Court members since then, it will be interesting to see how the court revisits the issue.”

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by the New York Times in “Ninth Circuit Appeals Court Grants More Protections for Asylum Seekers.” In response to the court’s decision that immigration authorities can no longer swiftly remove asylum seekers who fail an initial screening, Mr. Yale-Loehr said, “This is a historic decision. But the government will surely appeal this to the Supreme Court.” The article

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by CNN in “Meet the Immigrant Who Got a Second Chance from Justice Neil Gorsuch.” The article notes that Justice Gorsuch sided with the Supreme Court’s liberals in invalidating a provision of federal law that requires the mandatory removal of immigrants who have been convicted of some “crimes of violence,” agreeing that the law was unconstitutionally vague. Mr. Yale-Loehr noted that Justice Gorsuch’s vote did not necessarily make him pro-immigrant in every case, as evidenced by some of his other opinions. “But like his predecessor, Justice Scalia, he hates vague laws. This case shows that Congress needs to be more careful when it drafts immigration laws,” Mr. Yale-Loehr said.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Bisnow South Florida in “EB-5 Fund USIF Sued for Racketeering by Representative of Chinese Investors.” The U.S. Immigration Fund bundles foreign money to be loaned to developers for U.S. based projects. The Chicago-based Chinese-American researcher who filed the suit, Xuejun Makhsous, also known as Zoe Ma, alleges that Chinese investors were led to believe that they were backing a five-year loan with a real estate development as collateral, but they were actually purchasing limited partnership interests in a fund not secured by real estate. “It’s an interesting but novel argument. It remains for the court to decide whether it has validity.” The article

Stephen Yale-Loehr was quoted by CNN in “Trump Says Alabama Woman Who Joined ISIS Should Not Return to U.S.” Mr. Yale-Loehr said Hoda Muthana’s situation was “not clear-cut. It would depend on the facts, if the State Department argues that her father’s diplomatic status was still in effect. The family argues it expired. So ultimately, it may be up to a court to sort this out.” Ms. Muthana’s family has filed a lawsuit challenging the U.S. government’s assertion that she is not a U.S. citizen, the article notes. The CNN article. The lawsuit

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Bisnow South Florida in “Inside the Wild Legal Battle Over EB-5 Fraud, Defamation and a $2.5B Times Square Project.” Mr. Yale-Loehr noted that the EB-5 program was established as a part of a bigger overhaul of legal immigration in the early 1990s, “in part because Australia and Canada had similar programs.” Noting that it was enacted as a pilot program and still needs to be reauthorized periodically, he said redeployment has become contentious as processing times for visas have grown. Contracts can be structured various ways, he said, with all the money from a group being moved together at one time or in tranches. The article

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by the Cornell Daily Sun in “Tompkins County Deputy Called ICE to Report Mexican Man in U.S. Illegally, Drawing Sheriff’s Ire.” Mr. Yale-Loehr said, “I agree that it is a close call, but the county resolution explicitly states that nothing in the resolution bars a sheriff’s officer from sending a statement of a person’s immigration status to federal immigration authorities.”

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2019-04-15 11:04:222023-08-14 14:11:05ABIL Global Update • April 2019

ABIL Global Update • February 2019

February 15, 2019/in Global Immigration Update /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. Feature Article: ENTERTAINERS AND SHORT-TERM ENTERTAINERS: AN OVERVIEW -This article provides an overview of provisions for entertainers and short-term entertainers in Canada and Italy.

2. EUROPEAN UNION -This article provides a summary of highlights of “Brexit” and the outlook for the near future with respect to the free movement of affected workers.

3. ITALY -Italy has passed a decree on security and immigration. This article also briefly summarizes the plans for British citizens residing in Italy in the event of a Brexit no-deal.

4. TURKEY -This article discusses the process for citizenship in Turkey by real estate investment.

5. UNITED KINGDOM -This article discusses how the British government intends to treat European Union (EU) citizens, other European Economic Area (EEA) nationals, and Swiss nationals arriving in the United Kingdom (UK) after March 29, 2019, if the UK leaves the EU without a deal; the EU settlement scheme’s opening for a public test phase; plans for British citizens living in the EU in the event of a no-deal Brexit; the UK government’s plans for a single, skills-based immigration system that marks the end of free movement; and a new online system for right-to-work checks

6. New Publications and Items of Interest -New Publications and Items of Interest

7. ABIL Member / Firm News -ABIL Member / Firm News


Details:

1. Feature Article: ENTERTAINERS AND SHORT-TERM ENTERTAINERS: AN OVERVIEW

This article provides an overview of provisions for entertainers and short-term entertainers in Canada and Italy.

Canada

Canada is known as a popular destination for filmmakers and performing artists. Canada’s immigration law permits many entertainers and those working in the entertainment industry to work in Canada without a work permit or to obtain a work permit relatively easily by exempting them from obtaining a Labour Market Impact Assessment (LMIA).

Exemption from Work Permit

Section 186 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations outlines several situations in which a foreign national may work without a work permit. The ones relevant to the entertainment industry are:

  • 186(a): Film producers employed by foreign companies for commercial shoots, and essential personnel (e.g., actors, directors, technicians) entering Canada for short durations (typically no longer than two weeks) for a foreign-financed commercial (i.e., advertising) shoot (for television, magazines, or other media).
  • 186(g): A performing artist appearing alone or in a group in an artistic performance—other than a performance that is primarily for a film production or a television or radio broadcast—or as a member of the staff of such a performing artist or group who is integral to the artistic performance, if (i) they are part of a foreign production or group, or are a guest artist in a Canadian production or group, performing a time-limited engagement, and (ii) they are not in an employment relationship with the organization or business in Canada that is contracting for their services.
  • 186(m): A judge, referee, or similar official at an international cultural or artistic event.

There is also a short-term work permit exemption based on the Global Skills Strategy public policy (15 calendar days once every 6 months or 30 calendar days once every 12 months) available to those working in highly skilled occupations (National Occupational Classification (NOC) Skill Type 0 or Skill Level A). Producers, directors, choreographers, and film editors are considered NOC A occupations.

Exemption from LMIA

There are several LMIA exemptions applicable to those in the entertainment industry:

  • Exemption code C14 (Significant Benefit—Television and film production workers) targets foreign nationals in the television and film industry whose position or occupation is essential to a TV or film production. Two support letters are required: one from the production detailing the significant economic benefit to Canada of the TV or film production, and the other from the union or guild confirming that the proposed work is subject to a collective agreement and that it has no objection to the proposed work arrangement.
  • Exemption code C10 (Significant Benefit—General Guidelines) applies to any foreign national whose employment in Canada would create significant social, cultural, or economic benefit (examples include national or international awards, membership in organizations requiring excellence of its members, and general renown). Applications also must demonstrate that the foreign national’s employment will result in a neutral or positive impact on the Canadian labor market, and that the circumstances justify the issuance of a work permit in a timeframe shorter than that required to obtain an LMIA.
  • Exemption code C23 (Reciprocal Employment—Performing Arts) targets key creative personnel and talent associated with Canadian nonprofit performing arts companies and organizations in the orchestral music, opera, live theater, and dance disciplines. The employer must be a current recipient of core or composite funding from the Canada Council for the Arts or of financial support via parliamentary appropriation, such as the National Arts Centre. The application must include evidence from the applicable Canadian performing arts representative or service organization that reciprocal international opportunities exist for Canadians in the discipline. Examples of organizations include the Canadian Actors’ Equity Association, the Canadian Federation of Musicians, and the Canadian Actors’ Equity Association.
  • Exemption code C20 (Reciprocal Employment—General Guidelines) permits foreign nationals to obtain a work permit if similar reciprocal opportunities abroad exist for Canadians and if the foreign national’s employment would result in a neutral labor market impact. A Canadian performing arts organization that has a cultural exchange program with a foreign performing arts organization may be able to use this exemption code if it can show that Canadian members are currently participating in the exchange program abroad. Exact reciprocity (one Canadian member abroad for one foreign member in Canada) is not required but the general order of magnitude of exchanges should be reasonably similar on an annual basis.

All LMIA-exempt work permits require the employer to submit an Offer of Employment through the Employer Portal and pay a $230 employer compliance fee. The foreign national must pay a $155 work permit processing fee and, if not a U.S. citizen, an $85 biometrics fee.

Lastly, individuals who do not fit into either of the above categories would require a work permit based on an LMIA. While this would typically require the employer to publicly post the position for at least four weeks, there are certain situations in which the employer would be exempt from the advertising requirement, such as if the position is for a specific occupation in the entertainment sector where a worker is often hired for a very limited number of days, in a specific location, and on very short notice.

There is a $1,000 processing fee for the LMIA, which must be paid by the employer. Once issued, the foreign national must pay a $155 work permit processing fee and, if not a U.S. citizen, an $85 biometrics fee.

 

Italy

The information below summarizes the process for foreign performing artists, entertainers, and entertainment industry personnel wishing to work in Italy.

Artistic Subordinate Employment

Entry into Italy for the purpose of artistic subordinate employment is not subject to the “immigration quota” (i.e., the number of authorized entries for work reserved to foreign nationals set each year by the government) imposed each year by the Italian government and is regulated by Article 27, c.1 (l, m, n, o) of Italian immigration law. This means that subordinate work permit applications for entertainers can be applied for at any time of the year without being subject to limits. However, non-EU-national performing artists, entertainers, and entertainment industry personnel coming to Italy to perform their activities are not exempt from applying for work authorization and a related visa and permit. The following categories of artistic workers can apply for this type of work permit:

  • Circus workers and other traveling performers
  • Artistic and technical personnel for lyrical, theatrical, concert, or dance performances
  • Dancers, artists, and musicians working in established entertainment venues
  • Artistic and technical personnel for music, television, film, radio, and cultural production companies

The guidelines and requirements to apply for work permits for entertainment staff are outlined in Ministry of Labour and Social Policy circular letter n. 34 of December 13, 2006.

The work permit application is filed with a specific office within the Ministry of Labour and Social Policy. The crew/artists/staff/entertainers must be sponsored by an Italian entity/co-producer, even if they remain employees of the foreign company. In this case, the Italian entity/co-producer must be previously appointed by the foreign employer by means of a notarized “contract of agency” (Mandato di rappresentanza). It is vital that the sponsor/host entity in Italy provide evidence of compliance with fiscal and social security obligations. Artists, even if remaining hired above, must comply with the relevant social security obligations in Italy, unless otherwise established by bilateral social security agreements.

The work authorization is issued for an initial period not exceeding 12 months. An extension is possible under specific conditions. Once the work permit is issued and no later than 120 days from the date of issuance, applicants must obtain the relevant visa from the Italian consulate having jurisdiction over their place of residence abroad, then travel to Italy and apply for the residence permit within 8 days of arrival. In the case of artists/staff to be employed for no longer than 3 months, the work permit application can be filed even if the worker is already in Italy.

 

Steps of the process:

  1. Work permit application. This is filed by the Italian company sponsoring the application. The Work Permit must be applied for directly at the Ministry of Labor’s relevant office in Rome.
  2. Visa application. Once the work permit is issued, the visa application is filed by the applicant in person at the Italian consulate having jurisdiction over the applicant’s place of residence.
  3. Entry into Italy. Within 8 days of arrival visa holders must register with authorities and file the residence permit application. Residence permit (permesso di soggiorno) application is filed at the Post Office which issues (1) postal receipt – official document until the actual residence permit (permesso di soggiorno) card is issued and (2) an appointment for identification & fingerprints at Police office.
  4. Residence permit card. After fingerprints, the residence permit (permesso di soggiorno) card is processed; personal attendance is mandatory to collect the residence permit (permesso di soggiorno) card once issued.

Self-Employment

In case of entry for self-employment, a visa can be issued only to internationally well-known and highest-repute artists, artists of recognized high professional qualification, or artists who are hired by well-known Italian theaters, important public institutions, public television or well-known national private television entities (requirements set in Visa Decree May 11, 2011, n.850). This type of visa is subject to the “quota” limits.

Short-term visas (maximum 90 days) for artistic self-employment are issued outside the quota limits.

To be eligible for obtaining a self-employment visa as an internationally well-known and highest-repute artist, the applicant must:

  • Be an Internationally well-known and highest-repute artist or be an artist of recognized high professional qualification or be an artist hired by well-known Italian theaters, important public institutions, public television (RAI), or well-known national private television entities
  • Have self-employment contract(s) in place with an Italian impresario, company, institution, etc., with a compensation well above the minimum set forth for workers employed in the same sector in Italy
  • Not become an employee in Italy but work as a freelancer/self-employed
  • Obtain a clearance from the Italian Immigration Police
  • Have a suitable accommodation in Italy
  • Be covered by private health insurance

Steps of the process:

  1. Obtain relevant supporting documents (e.g., self-employment contract, labor authority declaration) and submit them to obtain a police clearance from the relevant police office in Italy
  2. Within three months from the date of issuance of supporting documents and the police clearance, file the visa application at the Italian consulate of reference
  3. With the work visa, the applicant travels to Italy. Within eight days he or she must apply for a residence permit (permesso di soggiorno)
  4. The residence permit (permesso di soggiorno) application is filed at the Post Office, which issues: (1) a postal receipt—an official document until the actual residence permit (permesso di soggiorno) card is issued; and (2) an appointment for identification and fingerprints at the police office. After fingerprints, the residence permit (permesso di soggiorno) card is processed; personal attendance is mandatory to collect this card once issued.

Back to Top


2. EUROPEAN UNION

This article provides a summary of highlights of “Brexit” and the outlook for the near future with respect to the free movement of affected workers.

It has now been over two and a half years since the United Kingdom (UK) resolved in a referendum held on June 23, 2016, by a slim majority (51.9% to 48.1%), to leave the European Union (EU). Following submission of the written Withdrawal Declaration to the European Council on March 29, 2017, effective after two years, negotiations on the terms and conditions of the withdrawal were initiated with some delay. An initial breakthrough in the negotiations was achieved about a year ago, and the first draft of the UK-EU Withdrawal Agreement was presented in the spring. The debate nevertheless continued to be highly controversial. Finally, in November 2018, despite all the adversity, a decisive breakthrough was achieved. On November 14, 2018, the EU and the UK reached an agreement on the revised version of the Withdrawal Agreement, which includes a transitional arrangement until December 31, 2020, which may be extended once by mutual agreement for a period that has not been specified.

However, this arrangement can only enter into force once it has been ratified by both the UK and the EU. Unless the Council agrees otherwise with the withdrawing Member State, Article 50, para. 3, TEU, states that European contracts will no longer apply after two years from the date of the formal application, i.e., after March 28, 2019, unless all Member States mutually agree on an extension. This is commonly referred to as “hard BREXIT” or “no deal” and would be accompanied by significant trade barriers between the UK and mainland Europe, with huge economic ramifications.

All of this is reason enough to take a closer look at the effects of the withdrawal from a residency law perspective and to appraise the (probable) future legal situation.

What is the law now and what will it be in the future? “The deal”

With regard to the freedom of movement (for workers), it is first necessary to bear in mind the regulations that will continue to apply until at least March 29, 2019, under the current legal situation and what would (probably) change in the future under the Withdrawal Agreement.

Legal Situation Before the Withdrawal

UK citizens continue to be (even after the Withdrawal Declaration on March 29, 2017) EU citizens or, more precisely, citizens of the Union. Article 17 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) states that any person who is a citizen of a Member State is also a citizen of the Union. This is the situation until two years after the declaration of withdrawal, i.e., until March 28, 2019. At present, this means that the privileges granted to UK citizens with regard to the right to free movement and residence (for workers) continue to apply. This includes the right of workers:

  • To apply for jobs offered on the market
  • To move unrestrictedly within the territory of the Member States for that purpose
  • To reside in a Member State in order to pursue employment there in accordance with the laws, regulations, and administrative provisions applicable to employees in that State
  • To remain within the territory of a Member State after having been employed there under conditions laid down by the Commission by means of regulations

However, these privileges with regard to the right to free movement and residence of workers will continue to apply without restriction for a period of two years (subject to a mutually agreed extension of this period) after the UK submitted its declaration of withdrawal.

Anticipated Legal Situation After the Withdrawal

The Withdrawal Agreement includes transition provisions (“Implementation Period”) until December 31, 2020, to mitigate the effects of the withdrawal on Union citizens and British citizens and contains the following detailed regulations:

Free Movement of Workers

EU citizens residing legally, temporarily, or permanently in the UK at the time of the EU withdrawal may continue to live, work (or become unemployed with no fault of their own, self-employed, study or seek employment within the meaning of Article 7(3) of the Free Movement Directive), or study in the UK. The same applies to British citizens who live in an EU member state.

Persons living temporarily or permanently in the United Kingdom at the time of the withdrawal or the date of the Withdrawal Agreement may also remain in the country. The same applies analogously to British citizens who are legally residing in an EU member state, including persons living with them in non-marital relationships. EU negotiators rejected a request by negotiators from the United Kingdom that a regulation be provided for with regard to British citizens who move to an EU member state after the date of record, stating that they had no mandate to provide for such regulation and that such matters would be provided for in a later agreement.

EU and UK citizens must be legal residents in the host Member State at the end of the transitional period in accordance with EU law on the free movement of persons. However, the Withdrawal Agreement does not require a personal presence in the host country at the end of the transitional period—temporary absences do not affect the right of residence, and longer absences that do not restrict the right of permanent residence are permitted.

According to the Withdrawal Agreement, the above rights will not expire after the transitional period. This means that Union citizens retain their right of residence essentially under the same substantive conditions as under the EU right of free movement, but must apply to the UK authorities for a new UK residence status. After five years of legal residence in the UK, the UK residence status will be upgraded to a permanent status with more rights and enhanced protection.

The same applies to British citizens who continue to legally reside in an EU Member State after a period of five years.

Family Members

EU citizens who are already legal residents in the UK either temporarily or permanently, at the time of the country’s withdrawal from the EU, have a right to family unification, including with family members who do not live with them yet. In addition to spouses (or persons with equivalent status), this also concerns parents and children (including children born after the date of record). The applicable regulations under national law will apply to any other family members.

Social Security

EU citizens who are already living in the United Kingdom at the time of the country’s withdrawal from the EU, as well as British citizens who live in an EU Member State, will retain their entitlements from health and pension insurance plans, as well as other social security benefits, or these entitlements are mutually taken into account.

Administrative Procedures

The United Kingdom promises its resident EU citizens a special residential status that secures their rights and can be applied for easily and at a low cost. EU citizens living permanently or temporarily in the United Kingdom can have their status clarified by the responsible administrative authorities until two years after the date of record. Decisions are to be made exclusively on the basis of the Withdrawal Agreement, without any further discretionary powers. The procedure is proposed to be quick, simple, convenient, and free of charge.

Case Law

Under the Withdrawal Agreement, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) retains jurisdiction for pending cases and questions referred by British courts until the end of the transitional period. EU citizens can only litigate their rights before British courts; these courts, however, will give consideration to the case law of the ECJ for a transitional period of eight years after the expiration of the transitional period, and may also continue to submit questions to the ECJ.

Right to Permanent Residency

The right of EU citizens to permanent residency after they have been in the UK for five years will be retained, with regulations under European law continuing to be authoritative for the eligibility requirements. Time spent in the country before the withdrawal will be taken into account, and periods of temporary absence (of up to six months within a period of 12 months) from the United Kingdom for important reasons will not count toward this period. EU citizens living outside of the UK will only lose their right of permanent residency after a period of five years. Existing permanent residency permits are proposed to be converted free of charge, subject to an identity check, a criminal background and security check, and the assurance and confirmation of ongoing residency.

The State of Play

The road to the possible conclusion and entry into force of the Withdrawal Agreement remained rocky as of January. To make things worse, all of this played out in a political minefield. Once the EU adopted the Withdrawal Agreement, it was the UK’s turn. The Parliament’s decision on the adoption of the Withdrawal Agreement was initially scheduled for December 11, 2018. In the meantime, however, British Prime Minister Theresa May held a crisis meeting and announced that she was postponing the vote until an unspecified later point in time. This was probably because recent surveys indicated that the Withdrawal Agreement would fail to attract a majority. The British Parliament ultimately rejected Prime Minister May’s Brexit deal on January 15, 2019.

The EU reiterated that the bloc would not be available for renegotiations on the Withdrawal Agreement. In the meantime, Ms. May held talks with German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Berlin and with leaders of other EU member states in Amsterdam, Holland, and Brussels, Belgium. So far, these talks were without success. It was more than symbolic that Ms. May was unable to disembark upon arrival in Berlin due to a technical defect that prevented her car’s door from being opened. The times in which a “handbag” moment (this refers to former UK Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, who “forced” a decision in a brash appearance in Brussels) is enough to persuade the EU to give in seem to be over. There was unanimous consent on the EU side that renegotiations were categorically excluded. The political pressure on Ms. May’s shoulders remains as heavy as it could possibly be despite having survived the vote of no confidence on December 12, 2018.

A further possible way out of this dilemma that has been suggested by the ECJ did not come as a surprise, given the opinion of the Advocate General published recently. In its judgment handed down on December 10, 2018, the ECJ, on the basis of a referral made at the request of Scotland’s highest civil court in the matter of Wightman et al. vs. Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (C-621/18), ruled that it is possible under certain conditions for the UK to unilaterally revoke the Withdrawal Declaration issued to the EU on March 29, 2017. It would be possible for as long as there is no binding withdrawal agreement and the period of two years stipulated in Article 50(3) TFEU has not expired, for as long as the revocation is made by a unilateral, unequivocal, and unconditional written declaration to the European Council after the concerned Member State has enacted the revocation decision in accordance with its constitutional requirements. Irrespective of this fundamental possibility established in this judgment, it is questionable whether this would happen before March 29, 2019, as the decision to issue such a revocation would also be subject to a majority in the British Parliament and, in all likelihood, could not ever be validly declared without the consent of the majority of Parliament.

Given all of these circumstances, both sides (but more on the UK side than on the EU side) continue to find themselves under massive pressure. Any extension of the two-year negotiation window, which would only be possible by mutual agreement, seems highly unlikely and would always entail the risk of a Member State “throwing a wrench into things” or demanding significant concessions in other areas before agreeing to such an extension. In this context, the possibility of a unilateral revocation of the Withdrawal Declaration could gain significance.

Assessment—”The Complete Mess”

The current situation seems hopeless from the point of view of the UK. The negotiating partners at the EU are not willing to make any further concessions. The alternative of withdrawing from the EU without a transitional arrangement appears to entail unpredictable economic disadvantages for the UK. On the other hand, the outcome of a second referendum, once again conceivable after the ECJ ruling on the possibility of unilaterally revoking the Withdrawal Declaration, is not as clear-cut as may be suggested in some newspapers. Calling all of this a “complete mess” would probably be a fair assessment.

The history of the EU tells us that the negotiations likely will eventually come to an end with a compromise that is bearable for both sides, even though we cannot predict the details. There might even be a chance that the United Kingdom will in the end remain in the EU. Stay tuned.

Back to Top


3. ITALY

Italy has passed a decree on security and immigration. This article also briefly summarizes the plans for British citizens residing in Italy in the event of a Brexit no-deal.

Security and Immigration Decree Passed

The Security and Immigration decree (“Salvini decree”) has been converted into law, confirming the amendments to Immigration and Citizenship law already in force since the publication of Law decree October 4, 2018, n. 113. With the conversion into law, the Parliament has also introduced further amendments to the initial version of the Law Decree.

In particular, the main changes to Law no. 91/1992, citizenship law, are as follows:

  • A new requirement for citizenship by marriage and naturalization applicants. It will be necessary to prove “adequate” knowledge of Italian language (at least level B1 of Common European Framework of Reference for Languages [CEFRL]). Those who have an EU long-term residence permit and those who comply with the Integration Agreement provisions are exempted from this requirement.
  • An increase in processing time for citizenship by marriage and naturalization applications (from 24 to 48 months). This also applies to applications already in process.
  • Citizenship applications by marriage can now be rejected even after 48 months (maximum processing time) from submission. Previously, it was not possible to reject a citizenship application by marriage after the maximum processing time.
  • An increase in the application fee for marriage, naturalization, and reacquisition from €200 to €250.
  • Citizenship acquired by marriage and naturalization can now be revoked in case of a final conviction for terrorism-related offenses and offenses related to public security.
  • Processing time for issuing civil status certificates (e.g., birth, marriage) requested for the purpose of filing a citizenship application is 6 months.

Regarding the changes to the Immigration Act, one of the most important amendments is the abolishment of permits for humanitarian reasons (previously granted to those who were not eligible to obtain refugee or subsidiary protection status). Instead, certain categories of applicants (e.g., victims of exploitation and domestic violence, people from countries hit by natural disasters, people in need of medical care) will be issued “special reasons” permits.

Plans for British Citizens Residing in Italy in the Event of a Brexit No-Deal

The Italian government is working on legislation that will be in place by March 29, 2019—the official Brexit date—in the event that no deal is reached. British citizens regularly residing in Italy will remain legal residents of the country also in this circumstance.

The legislative measures that will enter into force in case of a no-deal Brexit will ensure that British citizens residing in Italy as of March 29, 2019—that is to say, registered as a resident with their local registry office (anagrafe) at their town hall (comune) —will be granted enough time to apply for long-term resident status under EU Directive 2003/109/EC. In this way, British nationals will continue to enjoy rights such as access to healthcare, social benefits, employment, education, and family reunification.

British citizens living and working in Italy are advised to register with their town hall before March 29, 2019.

For more on Italy’s plans with respect to British citizens, see “Italy” below in the article under “United Kingdom.”

Back to Top


4. TURKEY

This article discusses the process for citizenship in Turkey by real estate investment.

Immigration investment programs have become very popular as a source of foreign investment in real estate in countries such as Canada, Greece, Grenada, and Moldova. Some programs focus on investment for residency purposes (e.g., Portugal, Greece) and others for citizenship (e.g., several Caribbean nations, Cyprus). Turkey’s investment immigration program focuses on citizenship and may particularly attract those citizens from emerging economies looking for a passport that allows them to travel more easily than their current passport. As of 2018, Turkish nationals enjoy visa-free or visa-on-arrival status in more than 100 countries or territories, including Singapore, Japan, Ukraine, Brazil, Korea, Mexico, and many countries in Africa, the Caribbean, and Latin America. Turkey’s program may also be popular with Arab nationals who were already investing significantly in Turkish real estate over the last several years.

Turkey’s citizenship regulations as of January 2017 allow investors to pursue Turkish citizenship through several categories, including capital investments, government debt instruments, investing in a business that employs 50 Turkish nationals, and venture capital investments. In September 2018, the threshold amounts were significantly lowered. With regard to real estate, investments of US $250,000 now qualify. Clearly, investment in real estate in Turkey has sparked interest internationally as the threshold amount is lower than that of many other investment citizenship programs.

For a real estate investment of US $250,000 to qualify, several restrictions apply. First, the purchase must have occurred after the change in the regulations (see specifics below). Additionally the property must not be sold by the applicant for at least three years. Note the following additional restrictions for real estate investments:

  • If the real estate is subject to a mortgage, the remaining part shall be taken into consideration by deducting the mortgage fee in determining the value.
  • The value in the official deed cannot be lower than the amount listed in the valuation report.
  • The applicant must show official receipts (by bank) showing the transfer of sales fee.
  • The real estate must be registered in the name of the applicant (foreign real person, may include spouse or minor children).
  • The real estate must not have been purchased by the applicant before December 1, 2017. If before September 18, 2018, the old regulations and thresholds apply.

The process of citizenship-by-investment is governed by the Foreign Investor Citizenship Application Special Joint Office (FICO). FICO is a new government agency under the Ministry of Interior that joins representatives from the Populations Registry Directorate, Migration Directorate, and Land Registry/Cadastre Directorate. FICO is currently set up in Istanbul and Ankara and will be rolled out in other locations across Turkey soon. FICO offices are set up to have desks with representatives of each of the Directorates to facilitate processing of cases from start to finish.

Citizenship by investment is a five-step process: (1) obtaining a Valuation Report; (2) issuance of a Certificate of Compliance; (3) filing a Residence Permit application; (4) filing an address registration; and (5) filing a citizenship application. Note that those foreigners who already lawfully reside in Turkey may have already completed steps 3 and 4.

Step 1: Valuation Report

Applicants must first have the real property intended to meet the citizenship application threshold be officially assessed for fair market value. This can only be done by a valuation firm authorized by the Capital Markets Board. A list of authorized firms is available here.

The valuation report can be issued before or after the acquisition of the real estate. It is sufficient to request a report with a copy of the deed, as the original or notarized deed is not needed. The valuation firm will need the consent of the property owner in order to study the property (site review) for a valuation report.

Step 2: Certificate of Compliance

Once the valuation report is complete, assuming it meets the regulatory financial thresholds, the applicant must then seek a Certificate of Compliance (CoC) from the Foreign Services Department of Land Registry and Cadastre Directorate (Foreign Cadastre). The Valuation Report, Title Deed, and proof of fund transfer to the seller are presented by the applicant to the Land Registry office that has jurisdiction over the location of the property purchased. The Land Registry office scans the documents in the packet and transfers them to the TAKB?S (Land Registry and Cadastre Information System) via EBYS (Electronic Document Management System). The Foreign Cadastre then issues a CoC to the applicant if all criteria are met. Processing time is approximately one week to receive approval electronically.

Step 3: Application for Residence Permit

Once the applicant is issued a CoC from the Foreign Registry, they may apply for a special Residence Permit for themselves and their legal dependents. Normally the Migration Directorate (MD) requires several steps to book appointments for filing residence permits. However, FICO’s Migration Directorate desk will allow qualified applicants and their dependents to streamline this process. The MD requires most of the documents typical for a tourist residence permit, but for this special investor residence permit, the MD additionally requires a copy of the CoC.

Qualified applicants are issued special category residence permits valid for one year. Note that this category of residence card does not permit the applicant to work in Turkey.

Step 4: Address Registration

Upon delivery of the residence card, the applicant must also complete an address registration at the Populations Registry desk at FICO. This is a procedure in which applicants officially register their place of residence in Turkey. The original title deed must be provided to complete the address registration process of the applicant and his or her dependents. Applicants will then be issued written confirmation of the registration of their residential address.

Step 5: Application for Turkish Citizenship

Once the applicant and his or her dependents have been issued residence permits and obtained their address registration documents, they may move on to the final step: filing citizenship applications. Aside from the standard citizenship application documents, investment applicants must additionally present the CoC and title deed to the property.

The Populations Registry desk at FICO sends the citizenship application file to the General Directorate of Population and Citizenship Affairs. The Directorate then conducts a background check and research (particularly related to national security and public order considerations). An interview is not necessarily required if applicants were interviewed previously for their residence permit applications.

A commission has been established within the Ministry of the Interior to monitor the progress of investment citizenship applications. In the event that an applicant clears background checks, the Ministry of Interior forwards the application to the Office of the Presidency. The citizenship application is then granted upon the decision of the President. Following a grant, the Ministry of Interior returns the approved application to the General Directorate of Population and Citizenship Affairs for final processing. Applicants are then invited to the Population Directorate to be issued their Turkish ID cards and apply for passports.

This article is not intended as specific legal advice and each investment application should be reviewed by an attorney. Contact your Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers (ABIL) attorney for advice in specific situations.

Back to Top


5. UNITED KINGDOM

This article discusses how the British government intends to treat European Union (EU) citizens, other European Economic Area (EEA) nationals, and Swiss nationals arriving in the United Kingdom (UK) after March 29, 2019, if the UK leaves the EU without a deal; the EU settlement scheme’s opening for a public test phase; plans for British citizens living in the EU in the event of a no-deal Brexit; the UK government’s plans for a single, skills-based immigration system that marks the end of free movement; and a new online system for right-to-work checks.

How New Arrivals Will Be Treated If UK Leaves EU With No Deal

The British government has outlined how it intends to treat EU citizens, other EEA nationals, and Swiss nationals arriving in the UK after March 29, 2019, if the UK leaves the EU without a deal.

According to an announcement and a policy paper published on January 28, 2019, if that happens, the following arrangements will be put in place:

  • Free movement will end immediately.
  • The UK will operate a transition period for EEA nationals arriving in the UK between March 30, 2019, and December 31, 2020.
  • During the transition period, EEA nationals will be able to enter the UK upon production of a valid EEA passport or identity card. If they have a biometric passport, they will be able to use e-gates as they do now. On arrival, they will automatically be granted leave to enter for three months with permission to work and study.
  • EEA nationals who want to stay for longer than three months will need to apply for a new status called European Temporary Leave to Remain. There will be a fee for this. Subject to criminality and security checks, they will be granted leave to remain for 36 months with permission to work and study. This status cannot be extended. EEA nationals who want to stay beyond 36 months will need to apply under whatever immigration system will be introduced as of January 1, 2021. Some of these people may not qualify under the future immigration system, in which case they will need to leave the UK at the end of the 36 months.
  • EEA nationals arriving on or after March 30, 2019, will be able to bring non-EEA nationals who are their “close family members,” meaning a spouse or partner and dependent children under 18. Those family members will need to apply in advance for a “family permit.”
  • During the transition period, employers carrying out right-to-work checks will not have to distinguish between EEA nationals who arrived on or before March 29, 2019, and those who arrived afterwards. A valid EEA passport or identity card will be enough to satisfy a right-to-work check.

These proposed arrangements will not apply to Irish citizens. They will continue to be free to live and work in the UK without restriction.

The arrangements will also not apply to EEA nationals who arrive in the UK by March 29, 2019. They will be eligible to apply for permission to stay under the EU Settlement Scheme (more about this below). Any EEA national planning to move to the UK in the next few months would be wise to arrive on or before March 29, 2019, if possible so they can be sure of qualifying for the EU Settlement Scheme. They should keep their travel ticket as evidence of when they arrived.

EU Settlement Scheme Open for Public Test Phase

The EU Settlement Scheme opened for a public test phase on January 21, 2019. EU citizens living in the UK will need to apply under the EU Settlement Scheme if they want to stay in the UK after the planned Brexit transition period ends on December 31, 2020. The scheme is intended to implement the rules on citizens’ rights set out in the draft UK-EU withdrawal agreement—and in some ways it is more generous than those rules. The British government has said in a policy paper published in December 2018 that it will still go ahead with the scheme if the UK leaves the EU on March 29, 2019. with no deal.

The following are questions and answers on the EU Settlement Scheme:

What is the deadline for applying for the EU Settlement Scheme?

The deadline for applying is June 30, 2021, if the UK leaves under a version of the current draft withdrawal agreement, or December 31, 2020, if the UK leaves with no deal.

Until December 31, 2020, EU citizens will be able to rely on an EU passport or identity card as evidence of their right to live and work in the UK. After that, they will need to have either pre-settled or settled status granted under the EU Settlement Scheme.

Who can apply for the EU Settlement Scheme?

The following people can apply during the public test phase:

  • Resident EU citizens with a valid EU passport
  • Their non-EU citizen family members with a biometric residence card

Other European Economic Area (EEA) nationals (nationals of Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Switzerland) cannot apply during the public test phase. They must wait for the EU Settlement Scheme to become fully open in March 2019.

How do you apply for the EU Settlement Scheme?

To take part in the test phase, you need access to an Android phone (not iPhone) with NFC (Near-Field Communication) contactless technology.

Download the EU Exit: ID Document Check app and use it to scan your passport and your face. After using the app, complete an online application. You will need to enter your National Insurance number, answer some basic questions, and pay the application fee by credit card.

How much does it cost to apply to the EU Settlement Scheme?

The application costs £65 for an adult and £32.50 for a child. It is free for people who already have a permanent residence document. UK Prime Minister Theresa May has announced that these fees will be scrapped when the scheme is fully open on March 30, 2019, and that anyone who applies during the test phase will have their fees reimbursed.

What happens after you apply to the EU Settlement Scheme?

The Home Office will carry out automated checks with HMRC (Revenue & Customs) and DWP (Department for Work and Pensions) on your tax and benefits records, and a criminal record check.

If the automated checks indicate that you have been living in the UK for a continuous five-year period and you do not have a serious criminal record, you will be granted settled status. Settled status is a type of indefinite leave to remain and will allow you to live in the UK permanently.

If the checks indicate that you have been living in the UK for less than five years, you will be offered pre-settled status. Pre-settled status is a five-year temporary status. You will be able to convert pre-settled status into settled status after completing five years’ continuous residence in the UK.

If you are offered pre-settled status but in fact you have lived in the UK for a continuous five-year period, you can upload copies of documents showing this. The Home Office has published a list of the documents it accepts as evidence of residence. You do not have to rely on the last five years. You can rely on any five-year period as long as you have not been absent from the UK for more than five years since the end of the five-year period.

You will not receive a document confirming your status. Instead you will be able to use an online service to view your status and to share the details with other people, such as employers and landlords.

Do you have to apply now for the EU Settlement Scheme?

You do not have to apply now. Assuming the UK does actually leave the EU, you will need to apply by June 30, 2021 (or December 31, 2020, if there is no deal). But in the current climate, many people will want to apply sooner rather than later.

Plans for British Citizens Living in the European Union in the Event of a No-Deal Brexit

A number of EU countries have started to publish their plans for the treatment of British citizens in the event of a no-deal scenario after the United Kingdom (UK) leaves the European Union (EU) on March 29, 2019.

British citizens will immediately lose their free movement rights across the EU if there is no deal, but these plans mean that British citizens already living in an EU Member State will at least be allowed to continue living and working in that country.

In summary, the proposals are as follows:

Czech Republic. On January 7, 2019, the Czech government adopted a draft law protecting the position of British citizens in the Czech Republic in the event of no deal. They will be given until December 31, 2020, to apply for a certificate of temporary stay in the Czech Republic, provided the UK takes a similar approach toward Czech citizens living in the UK. The British government has already indicated in a policy paper published on December 6, 2018, that it will take such an approach toward all EU citizens living in the UK.

More information on the Czech draft law

The UK government’s policy paper

France. France is due to enact a project de loi (enabling legislation) that will allow the government to pass regulations allowing British citizens who are legally resident in France on or before March 29, 2019, to continue living and working in France. In the meantime, British citizens living in France are strongly advised to apply for a carte de séjour as soon as possible, by March 29, 2019, at the latest.

France’s project de loi

Germany. According to the Berlin local government website, if there is a no-deal Brexit, British citizens will be given a three-month grace period to apply for a German residence permit. Their application must be submitted at their local Foreigners Registration Office by June 30, 2019. In the meantime, and while the application is being processed, they can continue to live and work in Germany.

The main concern will be for those who wish to naturalize as German citizens. British citizens who acquire German citizenship on or before March 29, 2019, will be able to keep their British citizenship. However, if they become German after that date, they must renounce their British citizenship because Germany does not allow dual citizenship with a non-EU country.

The Berlin local government’s website

More information on these issues

Italy. Italy was the first EU27 country to announce its plans, with the Italian government confirming on December 21, 2018, that it would introduce legislation allowing British citizens resident in Italy on March 29, 2019, to remain and maintain their existing rights to work in the event of no deal being reached. The intention is to create a path for all British citizens living in Italy to request long-term resident status under EU Directive 2003/109.

British citizens living in Italy are strongly advised to register with their town halls before March 29, 2019, to ensure they are legally resident.

More information on Italy’s plans

See also the article under “Italy” in this issue, above.

Netherlands. The Dutch government announced on January 7, 2019, that British citizens legally residing in the Netherlands on March 29, 2019, can continue doing so after Brexit in a no-deal scenario.

There will be a national transition period from March 29, 2019, to July 1, 2020, during which British citizens will retain their right to reside, work, and study in the Netherlands. This also applies to non-EU family members of British citizens.

The Dutch Immigration and Naturalisation Service has sent letters to British citizens who are registered with their municipality inviting them to apply for temporary residence permits before March 29, 2019. They will then receive a further letter inviting them to apply for a new national residence permit after the transitional period. This can be obtained if the British citizen meets the same residence conditions that apply to EU citizens, and will allow British citizens the right to work and study in the Netherlands.

The Dutch government’s announcement

Poland. The Polish government has announced that if there is a no-deal Brexit, it will introduce a 12-month grace period starting on March 30, 2019, for British citizens living in Poland on or before March 29, 2019. British citizens who have lived in Poland for five years will be able to apply for a permanent residence permit. Those who have lived in Poland for less than five years will be able to apply for a temporary permit.

The Polish government’s announcement

Sweden. According to reports, the Swedish government is proposing a 12-month grace period for British citizens to give them time to apply for permission to stay in the country if the UK leaves the EU without a deal.

For one such report, see Reuters

Switzerland. Switzerland is not in the EU, but Swiss nationals have free movement rights in the EU, including in the UK, and British citizens have similar rights in Switzerland. The UK and Switzerland have reached an agreement that protects the rights of Swiss nationals living in the UK and British citizens living in Switzerland. In a no-deal scenario, British citizens lawfully residing in Switzerland on March 29, 2019, will be able to continue exercising the same rights as they currently have, including rights of residence, access to healthcare, education, pensions, and social security coordination.

The agreement between the UK and Switzerland

Other Member States. We do not know yet how other EU Member States intend to treat British citizens living in their territory if there is a no-deal Brexit. More British citizens live in Spain than anywhere else in the EU. Many have applied for Spanish citizenship, but there is a big backlog, and so far there is no sign of a no-deal Brexit plan for them.

What should employers and their UK staff working in the EU be doing to prepare for a no-deal Brexit?

Employers should ensure that any British citizens living and working in the EU are aware of the relevant local immigration provisions and deadlines or grace periods so they can prepare the necessary documents for them and their families in the event that an application for residence or other paperwork needs to be filed.

British citizens who have lived in other EU countries for five years or more should consider applying for confirmation of their acquisition of permanent residence, which they are entitled to do under the Citizens Directive.

While many EU countries already require British citizens to register their residence, where this is not a legal requirement, it is advisable that this be done before March 29, 2019.

UK Government’s Plans for a New Single, Skills-Based Immigration System

On December 19, 2018, the UK Home Secretary, Sajid Javid, published a White Paper setting out the government’s plans for a new single, skills-based immigration system that marks the end of free movement.

This is the culmination of over two years of Brexit planning, starting with the Brexit vote in June 2016 to leave the EU. Promises to release this White Paper have come and gone throughout this period, but at long last we have the blueprint for what will be the new UK immigration system once the transition period comes to an end in December 2020. This will represent the biggest shake-up in immigration since the introduction of the Points-Based System (PBS) in 2008. The change is precipitated by the need to bring EU nationals within the UK immigration rules. Of course 2020 is some way off, and until then, there are likely to be changes, particularly with regard to the controversial proposed £30,000 salary cap.

The main provisions largely follow the recommendations of the Migration Advisory Committee published in September 2018.

Main Provisions

The new immigration system will introduce a new route for skilled workers that will apply to all nationalities equally, will not favor one nationality over another, and purports to treat all nationalities equally. Is this possible?

At present, the proposed salary cap for skilled workers is £30,000, but due to the likely impact of this new system on a number of sectors employing EU nationals earning significantly less, it will be subject to a public consultation. Skilled workers under the current Tier 2 Scheme need to be skilled to RQF 6 (degree level); however, it is proposed that this will now include those skilled to at least RQF 3 (A level standard).

It is also proposed that the annual cap on the number of Tier 2 General Restricted work visas issued will be removed. The cap has remained at 20,700 for the last few years. The Tier 2 cap has been particularly controversial because it caused significant recruitment issues for UK businesses when the cap was reached between December 2017 and July 2018, thus preventing employers from sponsoring the migrants they needed. Due to the problems with the cap being hit, the Home Secretary removed doctors and nurses from the quota.

One of the changes is that the Resident Labour Market Test (RLMT), the requirement for employers to test the market, will be removed, which many practitioners have campaigned for. This along with the removal of the Tier 2 cap will be very welcome by businesses as the requirements were very time-consuming and made the recruitment process stressful and often contrived.

There will also be a new route for workers at any skill level for a temporary period. The 12-month visa will provide access to the labor market but no access to benefits. This is an odd statement as migrant workers were never entitled to access benefits, so it is clearly aimed at European nationals. People arriving via this route will not be able to bring family members with them, will not accrue rights to settle in the UK, and will have a 12-month cooling-off period once their visa expires. These proposals will be subject to a consultation with businesses and other stakeholders as part of a planned extensive engagement program.

The Youth Mobility Scheme (YMS) allowing people aged 18 to 30 to come to the UK for two years for work or study will be expanded to encompass a UK-EU YMS scheme. This may go some way toward addressing the concerns surrounding a salary cap of £30,000, if significant numbers of EU nationals are able to come to the UK to take up lower-skilled work under this Scheme.

The White Paper proposals will also ensure that there is no limit on the number of bona fide international students who can come to the UK to study. Proposals extend the time they can stay post-study to find employment to six months for those who have completed a bachelor’s or master’s degree and 12 months for those who have completed a PhD.

The White Paper also proposes:

  • Creating a single, consistent approach to criminality by aligning EU and non-EU criminality thresholds
  • Ending the use of national ID cards as a form of travel documentation for EU citizens as soon as is practicable
  • Introducing an Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) scheme to allow vital information to be collected at an earlier stage before visitors who do not require a visa travel
  • Allowing citizens from Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, the United States, Singapore, and South Korea to use e-gates to pass through the border on arrival, alongside EU and UK citizens

The Immigration and Social Security Coordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill published in December 2018 ends free movement and creates the legal framework for the future borders and immigration system. It also creates the legal framework for a future, single benefits system that will apply to both EU and non-EU nationals and maintains the Common Travel Area between the UK and Ireland.

The new immigration and borders system will be implemented in a phased approach beginning in 2021, following an extensive 12-month program of engagement with businesses, stakeholders, and the public by the Home Office.

For Sponsors of Tier 2 migrants, the White Paper is a mixed blessing. Certainly the removal of the notorious Tier 2 cap and the time-consuming RLMT will be welcome. However, for those employers who have hitherto hired a high percentage of EU nationals in the past and perhaps do not currently have a Tier 2 Sponsor Licence, the changes will be significant. At present it is relatively straightforward to hire EU nationals as no work visa requirements apply. With the proposed changes, the administrative burden and costs of having to apply for a Sponsor Licence and then comply with Tier 2 Sponsor obligations will be onerous. The changes are likely to have a particularly significant negative impact on smaller and medium-sized businesses, due to the increased costs and administrative burdens associated with having to apply for work visas.

The proposed consultation and stakeholder engagement with respect to some items within the White Paper is welcome.

The White Paper

New Online System for Right-to-Work Checks

Immigration Minister Caroline Nokes announced that starting on January 28, 2019, employers can rely on an online Right to Work Checking Service to demonstrate compliance with work authorization requirements. Although the information at this link currently states that employers will also be required to conduct a right-to-work check in person, this will not be necessary effective January 28, 2019, when the new online Right to Work Checking service goes live.

The checking service

Back to Top


6. New Publications and Items of Interest

Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers:

  • The latest immigration news is at https://www.abil.com/news.cfm.
  • The latest published media releases include:
    • ABIL Says Proposed Change to Public Charge Rule Would Exclude Immigrants from Government Programs
    • New Data Show Increase in H-1B Denials and RFEs
    • ABIL Urges Administration to Change “Buy American and Hire American” Executive Order
    • ABIL Member Kuck Baxter Immigration Commercial Nominated for an Emmy
    • ABIL Members Note Immigration Threats for Employers in 2018
  • ABIL is available on Twitter: @ABILImmigration.
  • Recent ABIL member blogs are at http://www.abilblog.com/.

Back to Top


7. ABIL Member / Firm News

Robert Aronson and Debra Schneider, of Fredrikson & Byron, P.A., have co-authored “A Bridge Over Troubled Waters: The High-Skilled Worker Rule and Its Impact on Employment-Based Immigration,” published in 44 Mitchell Hamline L. Rev. 935-969 (2018) and available here.

A Forbes article quotes Dagmar Butte, Vic Goel, and William Stock. The article discusses how the combination of denials, long wait times, and suspension of premium processing is making it more difficult for H-1B professionals to change jobs. It concludes that the administration’s policies have made employers, H-1B professionals, and U.S. workers all worse off. The article: “U.S. Policies Harming Labor Mobility of H-1B Professionals.”

Charles Foster and John Meyer, chairman and partner, respectively, at Foster LLP, attended the EB-5 & Uglobal Immigration Expo hosted by EB-5 Investors Magazine on February 11, 2019, in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Mr. Foster presented an overview of the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program and its latest developments to representatives of leading EB-5 regional centers, migration agencies, and potential investors. More information

Mr. Foster delivered the keynote address at the immigration seminar, “Struggling With Your Immigration Status: Is Canada a Solution?,” hosted by The Aga Khan Economic Planning Board and Indo-American Chamber of Commerce of Greater Houston on December 15, 2018, in Houston, Texas. Mr. Foster spoke about the EB-5 Investment Program as a possible alternative to the H-1B visa backlog. More information on this event

Mr. Meyer was a guest speaker for “Investing and Doing Business in Texas,” an event hosted by Invierta en USA on January 30, 2019, in Mexico City, Mexico. Mr. Meyer spoke about the EB-5 Immigration Investor Program concerning how to obtain business and investment visas to immigrate to the United States. The audience included Mexican entrepreneurs who want to invest in, establish, and expand businesses in Texas. More information

Anu Nair, of Klasko Immigration Law Partners, LLP, served as a panelist for “U.S. Immigration and IRS Update,” a Business After Hours event sponsored by Gray Robinson Attorneys at Law and hosted by the Indian American Chamber of Commerce on January 15, 2019, in Orlando, Florida. She provided an overview of the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program and spoke on the latest developments. She included an update on the impending visa backlog for Indian foreign nationals. More information

Charles Kuck is the attorney for Grammy-nominated rapper 21 Savage, whose real name is She’yaa Bin Abraham-Joseph. Mr. Abraham-Joseph, who was born in England in 1992 and has been living in the United States since the age of seven, was detained recently on immigration charges by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Atlanta, Georgia. Mr. Kuck was quoted by Reuters in “Rapper 21 Savage Being Held Unfairly, Attorneys Claim.” Mr. Kuck noted that “ICE has not charged Mr. Abraham-Joseph with any crime. As a minor, his family overstayed their work visas, and he, like almost two million other children, was left without legal status through no fault of his own.” He said, “This is a civil law violation, and the continued detention of Mr. Abraham-Joseph serves no other purpose than to unnecessarily punish him and try to intimidate him into giving up his right to fight to remain in the United States.” Mr. Kuck also said that ICE was refusing to release his client on bond based on “incorrect information about prior criminal charges.”

The Reuters article

Additional details of Mr. Abraham-Joseph’s case:

  • Statement
  • New York Times
  • The New Yorker
  • Time
  • Rolling Stone

Mr. Kuck was quoted by Talking Points Memo in “Trump’s Companies Boosted Foreign Worker Visa Use to 10-Year High.” He said that the Trump Organization’s heavy reliance on visa programs flies in the face of the President’s political rhetoric and actions otherwise. “If in fact he wanted to ‘buy American, hire American,’ he’d say ‘we’re not going to use the immigration system, we’re going to go out and bring our workers down from West Virginia or from Kentucky or Maine and set them up and give them jobs. Why aren’t they recruiting in West Virginia? It’s hypocrisy.” The article

Mr. Kuck recently spoke about President Trump’s border wall efforts and the politics of immigration, on “Political Rewind.” Video, audio, and a related article are available at Political Rewind.

Robert Loughran and Matthew Myers, both of Foster LLP, provided an overview on December 4, 2018, of employment-based immigration strategies in the United States for small businesses and entrepreneurs from Latin America at the offices of Velocity Texas’ Global Accelerator Program, an initiative to incubate and accelerate competitively selected international companies in San Antonio, Texas.

Cyrus Mehta has authored several new blog entries: “Trump Can Provide a Potential Path to Citizenship for H-1B Visa Holders“; “Top 10 Most Viewed Posts Published on the Insightful Immigration Blog in 2018“; and “.”

Sophia Genovese, of Mr. Mehta‘s office, has authored a new blog entry, “The Trump Administration’s Lawlessness at the Border: Stories from Tijuana.”

David Isaacson, of Cyrus Mehta‘s office, has authored a new blog entry, “.”

Stephen Yale-Loehr was quoted by the Cornell Daily Sun in “Tompkins County Deputy Called ICE to Report Mexican Man in U.S. Illegally, Drawing Sheriff’s Ire.” Mr. Yale-Loehr said, “I agree that it is a close call, but the county resolution explicitly states that nothing in the resolution bars a sheriff’s officer from sending a statement of a person’s immigration status to federal immigration authorities.” The article

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Knowledge@Wharton, University of Pennsylvania, in “Exploring Immigration: Will the U.S. See Reform in 2019?” He said, “Congress came close in 2013 with a comprehensive immigration reform package that was passed bi-partisanly through the Senate and was 1,200 pages, but it failed to clear the House of Representatives. It has been historically hard to get immigration through any Congress and it has become only harder in this more politicized environment.” He also commented, “People in Congress are saying if we could combine funding for border security, plus some relief for DACA recipients and some protection for people who have temporary protected status, we could see some movement on immigration. I hope that would be the case, but politically we may be unlikely to achieve that.” Mr. Yale-Loehr concluded, “We need comprehensive immigration reform. There are many broken parts to the immigration system. Just trying to fix one of them, whether it’s asylum or illegal immigration, isn’t going to work. We need to have an overall approach. The Senate tried to do this in 2013. We need to have a national conversation about what is the role of immigration and when immigration can help the United States so that we can come up with a new overall comprehensive framework. Then we can untangle some of the mess that we’ve gotten ourselves into.” The article

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Voice of America regarding a Forbes.com H-1B column (in Vietnamese). The article

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by the Houston Chronicle in “With Inaction, Supreme Court Gives Longer Life to DACA as Shutdown Drags On.” Commenting on the U.S. Supreme Court’s declining to take up the Trump administration’s appeal in a “Dreamers” case, Mr. Yale-Loehr said, “I think it is very unlikely to be considered this term, which means DACA lives another 10 months.” The article

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by several media outlets on possible upcoming Supreme Court cases:

  • “Will The Supreme Court Fast-Track Cases Involving Trump?,” published by 538.com. Commenting on the ongoing litigation over Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), Mr. Yale-Loehr said it would be somewhat unusual for the high court to intervene at this stage. He added that the DACA case lacks the “immediacy” of the travel ban case, where thousands of people were being prevented from entering the country, so there’s not the same sense of urgency for the Supreme Court to act.
  • “Major Immigration Cases Ahead In 2019,” published by Law360. Mr. Yale-Loehr said that the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision earlier this year in Trump v. Hawaii upholding the president’s travel ban could have an impact on litigation over the recent asylum policy as it circulates through the appellate courts. “If this case goes to the Supreme Court, the court will have to decide the scope and possible limits of its travel ban decision,” he said. The article is available by registration.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted in “Sanctuary Policies Criticized Again After Officer’s Slaying. Here’s a Look at the Issues,” published by the San Francisco Chronicle. Commenting on whether police and sheriffs’ deputies ask about immigration status when making an arrest, Mr. Yale-Loehr said that varies among police departments and individual officers in California and elsewhere. If a suspected drunken driver lacked a license, for example, “or the driver’s license looked fishy, or the individual looked or sounded foreign,” some officers might contact U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to ask about the individual’s legal status, he said.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted in “What Did Donald Trump’s Tweet About H-1B Visas Mean?,” published by Forbes. He said that sometimes people can read too much into President Trump’s tweets and statements. He advised people to focus instead on concrete policy actions. “This tweet runs counter to what the administration has actually done against H-1B workers. Ever since the President issued his ‘Buy American and Hire American’ executive order in April 2017, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has made it harder for employers to hire H-1B workers and to keep them.” He noted a National Foundation for American Policy report that showed a 41% increase in denials of H-1B petitions in the 4th quarter of FY 2017. “Just last week, a company sued USCIS in federal court after the agency denied a company’s extension request for an H-1B employee, even though the agency had approved four H-1B petitions before for the same person in the same job. In effect, the President has built an invisible wall against H-1B workers. Given all that, why should we believe this apparent about-face? Even if President Trump is serious about making it easier for H-1B workers to stay permanently in the United States, his administration cannot do that unilaterally. Congress would have to pass a law.” He pointed out that Congress is divided on immigration issues, making this type of reform, particularly in isolation, difficult to picture in the current environment.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted in the South China Morning Post in “U.S. Investor Visa Programme Backlog Puts Chinese Capital at Risk” regarding the EB-5 immigrant investor green card program. Mr. Yale-Loehr said, “It’s a guessing game. Everybody is trying to figure out what to do and it’s a huge problem.” He noted that “the industry and investors need clarity, but nobody is holding their breath. They desperately need Congress to act on increasing the quota to alleviate the backlog, but that’s not anywhere on the horizon either. Unfortunately, I don’t see the light at the end of the tunnel.”

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted in two articles about a new federal court ruling blocking the Trump administration’s efforts to restrict asylum for people fleeing domestic violence and gangs. Both contain the same quote: “Although the government will almost certainly appeal, in the meantime … the federal court ruling ensures that people fleeing domestic violence or gang violence will have a fair shot.”

  • Los Angeles Times
  • Voice of America

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Law360 in “The Top Immigration Cases of 2018.” Commenting on Jennings v. Rodriguez, a Supreme Court decision that certain immigrants held in mandatory detention during removal proceedings are not entitled to bond hearings after six months in custody, Mr. Yale-Loehr said the case pits two contrasting high court decisions against each other. In 2001, in Zadvydas v. Davis, the Court interpreted an immigration statute to require periodic bond hearings for immigrants detained after a removal order because allowing indefinite detention of a noncitizen could cause a serious constitutional problem. Just two years later, however, in Demore v. Kim, the court upheld a provision requiring detention of immigrants awaiting their removal hearings. “If Jennings goes back to the Supreme Court, the court will have to determine which decision controls. The issue is now more important than ever, with the growing number of immigrants in detention and the long backlogs in immigration courts,” he said. The article is available with registration here.

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2019-02-15 11:07:352023-08-14 14:11:26ABIL Global Update • February 2019
Page 4 of 512345

Archive

  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • August 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • February 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006

ABIL is a corporation with over 40 top-rated immigration law firms and 1,500+ professionals.

News

  • ABIL Immigration Insider • October 5, 2025
  • ABIL Immigration Insider • September 7, 2025
  • ABIL Global Update • August 2025
  • ABIL Immigration Insider • August 3, 2025

Sign Up for our Newsletters

Sign up for our Immigration Insider & Global Updates Newsletters

Select list(s) to subscribe to


By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: . You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact
© Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers (ABIL) All Rights Reserved 2025
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Home
  • About
  • ABIL Lawyers
  • Global Immigration
  • Services
  • Industries
  • Resources
  • Contact
Scroll to top