• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
ABIL
  • Home
  • About
  • ABIL Lawyers
    • North America
      • Canada
      • Mexico
      • United States
    • South America
      • Colombia
      • Peru
    • Europe
      • Austria
      • Belgium
      • France
      • Germany
      • Italy
      • Netherlands
      • Poland
      • Spain
      • Switzerland
      • Turkey
      • United Kingdom
    • Asia Pacific & Africa
      • Australia
      • Hong Kong
  • Global Immigration
    • North America
      • Canada
      • Mexico
      • United States
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Colombia
      • Peru
    • Europe
      • Austria
      • Belgium
      • France
      • Germany
      • Italy
      • Netherlands
      • Spain
      • Switzerland
      • Turkey
      • United Kingdom
    • Asia Pacific & Africa
      • Australia
      • China
      • Hong Kong
      • India
      • Japan
      • South Africa
  • Services
    • Corporate Services
    • Compliance Services
    • Global Immigration Services
    • Government Policy
    • Complex Cases
    • Investment Services
    • Litigation Services
    • Pro Bono Services
  • Industries
  • Resources
    • Blogs
    • News
    • Newsletters
    • Videos & Recordings
    • Articles
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 2, No. 7 • July 01, 2006

July 01, 2006/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. ‘SKIL’ Bill Introduced in House; Would Benefit Employment-Based Immigration – The House of Representatives’ version of the ‘SKIL’ (Securing Knowledge Innovation and Leadership) bill was introduced on June 29, 2006.

2. USCIS Announces Filing Location Change for Employment-Based Adjustments – USCIS announced changes to the filing location for employment-based applications for lawful permanent resident status.

3. DHS Issues Proposed Rule on SSN Matches, ‘Safe Harbor’ Verification Procedures – DHS has proposed to amend regulations on the legal obligations of an employer when the employer receives a no-match Social Security letter and on “safe-harbor” procedures an employer can follow.

4. ICE Issues Interim Rule on Retaining I-9s Electronically – ICE has issued an interim rule providing that employers may sign and retain I-9 verification forms electronically.

5. State Department Issues Notice on New Passport Requirements – The Dept. of State proposes to implement in phases the requirement that travelers to and from the Caribbean, Bermuda, Panama, Mexico, and Canada will need a passport or other secure, accepted document to enter or re-enter the U.S.

6. No Action Yet in Congress on Comprehensive Immigration Reform Bills, But States Aren’t Waiting; Hearings Planned – The Senate and House have been unable to resolve their differences on comprehensive immigration reform legislation but members of Congress are calling for more hearings both in Washington, D.C., and around the country.

7. Senate Holds Hearing on Work Authorization Verification Enforcement – The Senate’s Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Citizenship held a hearing on immigration enforcement at the workplace.

8. USCIS Releases Guidance on Permanent Offers of Employment for Outstanding Professors and Researchers – USCIS has released guidance on applying the definition of “permanent employment” when adjudicating EB-1 petitions filed on behalf of outstanding professors and researchers.

9. USCIS Releases New Guidance on H-1B Cap Exemptions – USCIS has released new guidance for adjudicators on how determinations should be made with respect to the exemption from the H-1B cap for those who have earned a master’s or higher degree from a U.S. institution, and on eligibility for exemptions based on the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act.

10. State Dept. Instructs on How Consular Officers Determine Whether a Student Visa Applicant is Qualified – At the onset of the busy student visa season, the Department of State released information on how its consular officers will be making decisions about whether student visa applicants are qualified.

11. TPS Extended for Salvadorans – The 60-day re-registration period begins on July 3, 2006, and will remain in effect until September 1, 2006.

12. GAO Finds Labor Dept’s Oversight of H-1B Program Lacking; House Holds Hearing – The GAO has found that the Department of Labor’s review of H-1B applications is timely but lacks quality assurance controls and may overlook some inaccuracies.

13. State Dept. Reports on Visa Number Usage, Availability – A Dept. of State representative recently commented on China employment-based numbers and general availability for the remainder of the fiscal year.

14. State Dept. Issues Final Rule on Review of Nonimmigrant Visa Issuances, Refusals – The final rule focuses on an increase in reviews of visa issuances to enhance border security.

15. USCIS Ombudsman Lists ‘Pervasive and Serious Problems’ – The ombudsman’s annual report to Congress lists “pervasive and serious problems,” including, among others, backlogs and prolonged processing times

16. Sign-On Letter Supports Immigration – Over 500 economists have signed on to the Open Institute’s “Open Letter on Immigration,” which notes the benefits to the U.S. of immigration.

17. Google Launches New Government Information Search – Google U.S. Government Search provides a single location for searching across U.S. government information and keeping updated on government news.

18. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members


Details:

1. ‘SKIL’ Bill Introduced in House; Would Benefit Employment-Based Immigration

The House of Representatives’ version of the ‘SKIL’ (Securing Knowledge Innovation and Leadership) bill was introduced by Rep. John Shadegg (R-Ariz.) on June 29, 2006. Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) introduced the SKIL bill (S. 2691) in the Senate in early May. Among other things, the SKIL bill would increase the annual H-1B cap from 65,000 to 115,000, and exempt certain professionals from the H-1B and immigrant visa caps. The bill also would raise the latter cap from 140,000 to 290,000. A pre-certification program would be created for employers filing multiple applications with no history of abuse. Pre-certification would allow such employers to file their applications on a separate, more streamlined, track. The bill also would increase the time period allowed for foreign students’ post-curricular optional practical training from 12 months to 24 months.
Back to Top


2. USCIS Announces Filing Location Change for Employment-Based Adjustments

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on June 30, 2006, changes to the filing location for employment-based applications for lawful permanent resident status. Starting on July 24, 2006, all applicants filing an Application to Adjust Status or Register Permanent Residence (Form I-485) based on a pending or approved Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker (Form I-140), also referred to as a “standalone filing,” should mail that form directly to the Nebraska Service Center. Applicants should send accompanying forms (e.g., the Application for Travel Document (Form I-131) and/or the Application for Employment Authorization (Form I-765)) to the same location.

USCIS said the change marks the second phase of “Bi-Specialization,” a USCIS initiative to implement centralized filing and bi-specialized adjudications. USCIS is aligning similar workloads between two “sister” service centers. Starting on July 24, the Nebraska Service Center/Texas Service Center pairing will process all employment-based adjustment of status applications (and related applications). Although the Nebraska Service Center will serve as the centralized filing location, some petitioners and applicants will receive a filing receipt from the Texas Service Center, if the case is handled by that center. The center that generates the I-485 receipt notice will be the center that actually adjudicates the case, USCIS noted.

USCIS said it will not reject any standalone I-485s sent to an incorrect service center upon implementation of the amended filing instructions that go into effect on July 24. Instead, USCIS will accept the filing, direct it to the correct location, and honor the initial receipt date. The July 24 change establishing the new filing location does not affect other aspects of the form instructions; USCIS will continue honoring earlier versions of the I-485.

The USCIS news release announcing the change is at: http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/publicaffairs/newsrels/BiSpec_063006PR.pdf.

Back to Top


3. DHS Issues Proposed Rule on SSN Matches, ‘Safe Harbor’ Verification Procedures

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), under the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), proposed on June 14, 2006, to amend regulations relating to the unlawful hiring or continued employment of unauthorized aliens. The amended regulation describes the legal obligations of an employer when the employer receives a no-match letter from the Social Security Administration (SSA) or the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). It also describes “safe-harbor” procedures that the employer can follow in response to such a letter and thereby “be certain that DHS will not find that the employer had constructive knowledge that the employee referred to in the letter was an alien not authorized to work in the United States.”

The proposed rule adds to the current regulation’s definition of “knowing” two more examples of situations that may lead to a finding that an employer had such constructive knowledge. These additional examples involve an employer’s failure to take reasonable steps in response to either of two events: (1) The employer receives written notice from the SSA that the combination of name and social security account number submitted to the SSA for an employee does not match agency records; or (2) the employer receives written notice from the DHS that the immigration status documentation or employment authorization documentation presented or referenced by the employee in completing the I-9 form was not assigned to the employee according to DHS records.

The proposed rule also states that whether the DHS will actually find that an employer had constructive knowledge that an employee was an “unauthorized alien” in a situation described in any of the regulation’s examples “will depend on the totality of relevant circumstances.” The “safe-harbor” procedures include attempting to resolve the no-match and, if it cannot be resolved within a certain period of time, verifying again the employee’s identity and employment authorization through a specified process.

The regulation would not preclude the DHS from finding that an employer had actual knowledge that an employee was unauthorized. An employer with actual knowledge that one of its employees is unauthorized could not avoid liability by following the procedures described in the proposed regulation. The burden of proving actual knowledge, however, would be on the government, the proposed rule notes. Also, the resolution of discrepancies in a no-match letter, or other information that an employee’s Social Security number presented to an employer matches the records for the employee held by the SSA, “does not, in and of itself, demonstrate that the employee is authorized to work in the United States.”

Written comments may be submitted in accordance with the procedures outlined in the proposed rule’s summary by August 14, 2006. ICE is particularly interested in comments on the time limits described in the proposed rule, which is available at: http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/E6-9303.pdf.

Back to Top


4. ICE Issues Interim Rule on Retaining I-9s Electronically

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) issued an interim rule on June 15, 2006, that provides that employers and recruiters or referrers for a fee who are required to complete and retain an I-9 form (Employment Eligibility Verification) for each employee may sign and retain these forms electronically.

The interim rule implements statutory changes to the I-9 retention requirements by establishing standards for electronic signatures and the electronic scanning and retention of the I-9. The interim rule’s supplementary information notes that these standards closely follow widely accepted electronic storage standards and requirements previously published in Internal Revenue Service regulations. ICE said that reducing any potential burden on the business community by the adoption of existing standards already in wide use was a critical consideration.

There are still many open issues about the best practices for electronic signature and storage of I-9s. Employers are encouraged to comment on the interim rule after consulting with their IT departments and immigration counsel.

Written comments may be submitted by August 14, 2006, via the procedures outlined in the interim rule’s summary. The full text of the interim rule is available at: http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/E6-9283.pdf.

Back to Top


5. State Department Issues Notice on New Passport Requirements

The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 requires that by January 1, 2008, travelers to and from the Caribbean, Bermuda, Panama, Mexico, and Canada have a passport or other secure, accepted document to enter or re-enter the United States. The Department of State is proposing to implement the requirement in phases following a proposed timeline.

In the proposed implementation plan, which will be subject to a period of public comment, the requirement will be applied to all air and sea travel to or from Canada, Mexico, Central and South America, the Caribbean, and Bermuda on December 31, 2006. The requirement will be extended to all land border crossings on December 31, 2007.

The Department noted that this is a change from previous travel requirements and will affect all U.S. citizens entering the U.S. from countries within the Western Hemisphere who do not currently possess valid passports. This new requirement will also affect certain foreign nationals who currently are not required to present a passport to travel to the U.S. Most Canadian citizens, citizens of the British Overseas Territory of Bermuda and, to a lesser degree, Mexican citizens will be affected by this requirement.

Back to Top


6. No Action Yet in Congress on Comprehensive Immigration Reform Bills, But States Aren’t Waiting; Hearings Planned

Although the Senate and House of Representatives have been unable to resolve their differences on comprehensive immigration reform legislation so far this session, various members of Congress and others are calling for more hearings on immigration issues, many focusing on enforcement, to be held this summer both in Washington, D.C., and around the country.

The House Education and Workforce Committee, for example, plans a “field” hearing some time in mid-July (the date and location have not yet been decided) focusing on English as the official language of the U.S. and on the effect of enforcement of immigration laws on U.S. workers. On the Senate side, Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) plans a hearing in Pennsylvania on July 5 on the topic of foreign guestworkers.

Meanwhile, several states have jumped into the fray. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, at least 30 states this year have considered over 75 bills targeting employers of unauthorized foreign workers. Among others, Colorado has directed its own Department of Labor and Employment to investigate contractors performing work for the Colorado state government that violate federal laws against hiring unauthorized workers. Pennsylvania state lawmakers are considering legislation to toughen penalties for employers statewide that hire unauthorized workers, and already have increased penalties for such employers who receive government grants or loans. Georgia and Massachusetts have begun requiring public employers to verify that no unauthorized workers have been hired. Many such efforts are largely symbolic, however, because of federal laws and penalties already on the books against hiring unauthorized workers.

Regardless of what happens this summer around the country, prospects for passage of a comprehensive immigration reform bill in Congress appear increasingly dim, although the Bush administration and others are still pushing for one. House Speaker Dennis Hastert said, “We want to make sure the Congress gets this done the right way and not be rushed just because it’s an election year.” Stay tuned.

Back to Top


7. Senate Holds Hearing on Work Authorization Verification Enforcement

The Senate’s Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Citizenship held a hearing on June 19, 2006, on “Immigration Enforcement at the Workplace: Learning from the Mistakes of 1986.”

Stewart Baker, Assistant Secretary for Policy Development under the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), noted in his testimony that the Bush administration is proposing a comprehensive overhaul of the employment authorization verification and employer sanctions programs as part of immigration reform. “We are proposing this now, because it is clear that the system set up in the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) didn’t work,” Mr. Baker said. IRCA “created a brisk trade in fake IDs,” Mr. Baker said, and employers had no way to verify documentation. The Basic Pilot work authorization verification program has been limited and voluntary thus far, and penalties for violations are low, he noted. Other obstacles, Mr. Baker said, include a lack of effective information-sharing and a failure to “follow the fraud” when new schemes evolve.

Mr. Baker said the administration is proposing: (1) a mandatory electronic employment verification system (EEVS) for employers that will ensure that businesses have a “clear and reliable” way to check work documents, including social security numbers, (2) allowing the Social Security Administration to share no-match data with the DHS to permit the latter to better focus enforcement efforts, (3) ensuring that all legal foreign workers have a secure employment authorization card that will reduce the ability of such workers to engage in document fraud, and (4) stiffening the penalties for employers who violate these laws.

The U.S. needs the ability “to set clear, reasonable standards of good conduct for employers,” Mr. Baker said, to include asking them to review employee documents using the electronic verification system and retain all documents relevant to their employees’ eligibility to work. Employers who are shown to have hired a significant number of unlawful workers in a year “should face a presumption that they have knowingly hired these individuals,” Mr. Baker said. “We also need to tighten the rules to ensure that employers cannot use contract arrangements to ‘wall themselves off’ from complicity in the illegal hiring of their contractors.”

While acknowledging that most of the administration’s proposals involve improvements to the existing employment verification and sanctions system, Mr. Baker said the President has proposed two major new improvements: the mandatory electronic verification system and sharing of no-match Social Security data with the DHS. “Sufficient access to no-match data would provide important direction to [U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement] investigators to target their enforcement actions toward those employers who have a disproportionate number of these no-matches, who have reported earnings for multiple employees on the same number and who are therefore more likely to be engaging in unlawful behavior,” he said.

Cecilia Munoz, Vice President for Research, Advocacy, and Legislation at the National Council of La Raza, expressed concerns that advancing an employer verification system could “jeopardize a substantial portion of the U.S. workforce” because data inaccuracies will cast doubt on some workers’ ability to do their jobs lawfully, “while others will likely be the victims of ‘defensive hiring,’ that is, employment practices [that] weed out people perceived as immigrants, or whose ethnicity suggests that they might be in the category of workers for whom verification is time-consuming and costly because the databases are fraught with errors.” She said La Raza supports devising a system that can allow employers to verify workers’ authorization swiftly while protecting them against dismissal or discrimination because of bias, ignorance, or faulty data. “The creation of [an electronic verification] system without addressing the fundamental flaws in the current program is unadvisable and will result in severe negative consequences for immigrant and U.S. workers on a much larger scale than they currently experience,” Ms. Munoz warned.

C. Stewart Verdery, Jr., an Adjunct Fellow with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and formerly the DHS’s Assistant Secretary for Border and Transportation Security Policy and Planning, recommended: (1) phasing in any electronic verification system, starting with occupations most crucial to national security; (2) ensuring employee rights before termination; (3) developing biometric identification and, in the interim, implementing the REAL ID program; (4) involving the private sector in proposing and implementing innovative solutions; and (5) imposing fees to help pay the cost.

The hearing testimony is available at: http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearing.cfm?id=1949. The U.S. Government Accountability Office’s testimony, Immigration Enforcement: Weaknesses Hinder Employment Verification and Worksite Enforcement Efforts, is available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06895t.pdf.

Back to Top


8. USCIS Releases Guidance on Permanent Offers of Employment for Outstanding Professors and Researchers

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services recently released guidance on applying the definition of “permanent employment” when adjudicating first preference (EB-1) petitions filed on behalf of outstanding professors and researchers.

The guidance notes that a recent review of modern business practices reveals that most employment agreements, when entered into between the employer and potential employee, provide that a tenure-track teaching position or comparable research position is terminable “at will,” even though both the employer and employee normally expect the employment to continue for an indefinite or unlimited duration. In determining whether a petitioning employer has established that a research position is permanent, the guidance notes, some adjudicators have focused solely on whether the language of an actual employment contract, if submitted, or the offer of employment contains a “good cause for termination” provision. Evidence of such a provision is not mandated under the regulations and is not the only way by which a petitioning employer may demonstrate that an employee in a research position has “an expectation of continued employment,” the guidance notes. Some adjudicators also inadvertently have applied the definition of “permanent,” which only affects research positions, to the assessment of whether a non-research position is tenured or tenure-track.

The guidance clarifies that adjudicators should not deny a petition for a permanent research position where the employer is seeking an outstanding researcher solely because the actual employment contract or offer of employment does not contain a “good cause for termination” clause. The petitioning employer still must establish that the offer is intended to be of an indefinite or unlimited duration and that the nature of the position is such that the employee ordinarily will have an expectation of continued employment.

Many research positions are funded by grant money received on a yearly basis. Researchers, therefore, are employed pursuant to contracts that are valid in one-year increments. If the petitioning employer demonstrates the intent to continue to seek funding and a reasonable expectation that funding will continue, such as demonstrated previous renewals for extended long-term research projects, such employment can be considered “permanent” within the meaning of the regulations, the guidance states. Adjudicators also should consider the circumstances and benefits surrounding the job offer.

Determinations of whether a position qualifies as a tenured or tenure-track position are not linked to the regulatory requirement that the position be “permanent,” which applies only to research positions, the guidance notes. As such, adjudicators do not need to evaluate whether the employment contract for a tenured or tenure-track position has a “good cause for termination” clause “and should not deny a petition seeking an outstanding professor for [such a] position on that basis alone.” Adjudicators, however, should continue to evaluate whether the overall nature of the position is tenured or tenure-track.

The full text of the guidance is available at: http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/lawsregs/handbook/EB1Visa060606.pdf.

Back to Top


9. USCIS Releases New Guidance on H-1B Cap Exemptions

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently released new guidance for adjudicators on: (1) how determinations should be made with respect to the exemption from the H-1B cap for those who have earned a master’s or higher degree from a U.S. institution, and (2) eligibility for exemptions based on the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act of 2000 (AC21).

The guidance on master’s or higher degrees states that, when reviewing a petition involving a potential cap case, adjudicators should first determine if there is another basis to exempt the beneficiary from the H-1B cap. Then, in determining whether a U.S.-issued degree is a master’s degree, adjudicators “should consider more than the simple nomenclature of a degree.” To qualify as a master’s degree for purposes of meeting the cap exemption requirement, the guidance states, the degree must be one for which a bachelor’s degree in any field is required as a prerequisite. This ensures that the master’s degree is at least one level higher than a bachelor’s degree, the essential component of the “master’s or higher” degree requirement.

USCIS provided several examples of why degrees should not be adjudicated at face value. In the chiropractic field, the guidance notes, the entry-level degree is “Doctor of Chiropractic,” and a bachelor’s degree in any field is not a prerequisite. On the other hand, attorneys typically hold a “juris doctor” degree and medical doctors hold a “doctor of medicine degree.” Although neither degree is equivalent to a Ph.D., “a J.D. or M.D. would be considered to be equivalent to, if not higher than, a master’s degree,” the notice states.

To obtain the H-1B cap exemption for a U.S. master’s degree or higher, the guidance notes, the requirements of both a qualifying master’s or higher degree, and issuance of the degree from a U.S. institution of higher education, must be met. The guidance also outlines what the term “institution of higher education” means for purposes of the H-1B cap exemption.

The guidance on master’s or higher degrees, sent to the field on May 2, 2006, is available at: http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/lawsregs/handbook/AC21_050206.pdf.

USCIS also released guidance regarding eligibility under AC21 for an H-1B cap exemption based on employment or an offer of employment at an institution of higher education, a related or affiliated nonprofit entity, a nonprofit research organization, or a governmental research organization. The lengthy guidance notes that a number of questions have been raised and clarifies how USCIS will interpret these terms, including for third-party petitioners, when adjudicating H-1B petitions requesting exemptions to the cap.

Noting that the exemption allowed for those who are employed “at” a qualifying institution is a broader category than would be the case for those employed “by” a qualifying institution, USCIS states that it will allow third-party petitioners to claim exemption if the beneficiary will perform job duties “that directly and predominately further the normal, primary, or essential purpose, mission, objectives or function of the qualifying institution, namely, higher education or nonprofit or governmental research.” The guidance notes that if a petitioner is not itself a qualifying institution, the petitioner bears the burden of establishing that there is a logical nexus between the two. In many instances, the guidance notes, third-party petitioners seeking exemptions are companies that have contracts with qualifying federal agencies or other institutions that require the placement of professionals on-site at the agency. The H-1B employees generally perform work directly related to the purposes of the qualifying federal agency or entity and thus may qualify for an exemption to the H-1B cap. Qualifying third-party employment can occur in a variety of other ways; the guidance provides a non-exhaustive list of examples.

The AC21 guidance, sent to the field on June 6, 2006, is available at http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/lawsregs/handbook/AC21C060606.pdf.

Back to Top


10. State Dept. Instructs on How Consular Officers Determine Whether a Student Visa Applicant is Qualified

At the onset of the busy student visa season, the Department of State has released information on how its consular officers will be making decisions about whether student visa applicants are qualified. A cable sent to the field on May 31, 2006, notes that consular officers should focus on several areas:

(1) Student visa applicants must demonstrate that they are academically qualified to pursue their intended course of study and are financially able to cover its costs. Consular officers are instructed to “focus on the applicant’s immediate and near-term intent, remembering that by nature foreign students stay in the United States for extended periods of time.”

(2) Additionally, the cable notes, consular officers should “remember to focus on the student and not the institution during adjudication.” Student visa applicants should be afforded the opportunity to demonstrate why their choice of institution is right for them and that they will be able to maintain status as a student at that school. “Consular officers should not second-guess an individual’s choice of school, or deny a visa based solely on the student’s choice of a particular academic institution.” Posts should, however, bring to the Department’s attention institutions they believe are improperly issuing I-20s.

(3) Recent guidance extended the period during which student visas may be issued to 120 days before the program start date. In instances where students can anticipate delays in issuance, including delays resulting from security advisory opinion (SAO) requirements, posts may accept applications for adjudication and processing even before this 120-day period, the cable states, but may not issue the actual visa until 120 days before the start of studies. Although SAO delays for students have declined significantly over the last two years, a small number of cases continue to face extended review, the cable notes.

(4) The State Department’s Bureau of Consular Affairs supports the efforts of posts to make visa interviews available to students on a priority basis and posts should continue, as necessary, to expedite student and exchange visitor visa applications. “Efficient processing of visas for students and exchange visitors is a high priority for the Department: every student should have the chance to make the initial start date of his/her academic or exchange program whenever possible,” the cable notes.

The full text of the cable is available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/laws/telegrams/telegrams_2926.html.

Back to Top


11. TPS Extended for Salvadorans

The designation for El Salvador of temporary protected status (TPS) was set to expire on September 9, 2006. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on June 15, 2006, that TPS for El Salvador has been extended for 12 months, until September 9, 2007. The notice provides details on re-registration procedures and information on late initial registration. Given the large number of Salvadorans affected by the extension, USCIS said it recognizes that many re-registrants may not receive an extension sticker or new employment authorization document (EAD) until after their current EADs expire on September 9, 2006. Accordingly, the notice automatically extends the validity of EADs issued under the TPS designation of El Salvador for 6 months until March 9, 2007, and explains how TPS beneficiaries and their employers may determine which EADs are extended automatically.

The 60-day re-registration period begins on July 3, 2006, and will remain in effect until September 1, 2006. Applicants are strongly encouraged to file as soon as possible after the start of the re-registration period. The full text of the notice is available at: http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/06-5443.pdf.

Back to Top


12. GAO Finds Labor Dept’s Oversight of H-1B Program Lacking; House Holds Hearing

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) has found that reviews by the Department of Labor (DOL) of H-1B applications are timely but lack quality assurance controls and may overlook some inaccuracies.

The report notes that from January 2002 through September 2005, the DOL electronically reviewed more than 960,000 such applications and certified almost all of them. About one-third of the applications were for computer systems analysis workers and programming occupations. The GAO’s analysis of the DOL’s data found certified applications with inaccurate information that could have been identified by more stringent checks.

The GAO found 3,229 applications that were certified even though the wage rate on the application was lower than the prevailing wage for that occupation. Additionally, approximately 1,000 certified applications contained erroneous employer identification numbers, which the GAO said raised questions about the validity of the applications.

From fiscal year 2000 through FY 2005, the GAO noted, the DOL’s Wage and Hour Division (WHD) reported an increase in the number of H-1B complaints and violations, and a corresponding increase in the number of employer penalties. In FY 2000, the DOL required employers to pay back wages totaling $1.2 million to 226 H-1B workers; by FY 2005, back wage penalties had increased to $5.2 million for 604 workers. “Program changes, such as a higher visa cap in some years, could have been a contributing factor,” the GAO said.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) reviews the DOL’s certified applications but cannot easily verify whether employers submitted petitions from more workers than originally requested because U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service’s database cannot easily match each petition to the DOL’s application case number, the GAO noted. Also, while reviewing petitions, DHS staff may find evidence that employers are not meeting their H-1B obligations and may deny a petition if an employer is unable to explain a discrepancy, but the agency does not have a formal process for reporting such discrepancies to the DOL. Also, current law precludes the WHD from using this information to initiate an investigation of the employer, and the GAO found other information-sharing difficulties.

The GAO recommends that Congress consider eliminating the restriction on the DOL that prevents it from using information from the DHS to initiate an investigation, and directing the DHS and DOL to share information on employers that may not be fulfilling program requirements. The GAO also recommends that the DOL improve its checks of employers’ applications and that USCIS include the DOL’s application case number in its new information technology system.

The GAO noted that the DHS agreed with its recommendations, but the DOL questioned whether more stringent checks were needed and believes Congress intentionally limited the DOL’s role and placed program integrity with USCIS. “We believe there are cost-effective methods that Labor could use to check the applications more stringently that would enhance the integrity of the H-1B process,” the GAO concluded.

The House of Representatives’ Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims held a hearing on this topic on June 22, 2006. Committee chairman F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr.’s news advisory is available at http://judiciary.house.gov/media/pdfs/h1blabor62106.pdf. Testimony is posted at http://judiciary.house.gov/oversight.aspx?ID=247. There is a video link to the full hearing on the same Web page.

The full text of the GAO’s report, H-1B Visa Program: Labor Could Improve Its Oversight and Increase Information Sharing with Homeland Security, is available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06720.pdf.

Back to Top


13. State Dept. Reports on Visa Number Usage, Availability

A Department of State representative has reported that China’s EB-1 category became current in July because demand was less than projected. 1,700 Chinese EB-1 numbers have been used; 2,800 are available for the fiscal year. Overall, China has used 5,600 employment-based numbers with 9,800 available for the year. It is likely that China will not hit the limit overall. Previously U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) was clearing out its backlog of employment-based immigrant visa petitions, causing delays. Demand is now lower because approvals seem to have stabilized, the representative noted. EB-1 China numbers should continue to be available, although there is no guarantee, because the backlogs encountered recently resulted from an apparent surge in processing by USCIS.

Further, the representative noted, 37,000 of the 50,000 Schedule A numbers have been allocated. Current usage is 2,700 to 2,800 per month, so a supply should remain available through October or November of 2006. The Department will not allocate a case to Schedule A if an EB-2 or EB-3 number is available for the individual based on the petition.

Meanwhile, the representative noted, recent pessimistic comments about future availability of visa numbers were directed at family-based, not employment-based, numbers. Readers should not assume visa availability, however, until the cut-off dates are announced. Current visa number availability information is at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_2943.html.

Back to Top


14. State Dept. Issues Final Rule on Review of Nonimmigrant Visa Issuances, Refusals

The Department of State issued a final rule, effective June 30, 2006, expanding guidance on its review of nonimmigrant visa issuances and refusals to specify who should conduct the reviews, the types of cases to be reviewed, and the goals of the reviews. The final rule focuses on an increase in reviews of visa issuances to enhance border security. The Department said the purpose of the revision is to expand the scope of reviews to ensure that supervisors are reviewing both issuances and refusals to the greatest extent practicable, while balancing workload considerations at consular posts.

The Department noted that the Foreign Affairs Manual calls for a spot-check of nonimmigrant visa issuances. The rule revision provides a regulatory framework for a “regular and targeted” review of issuances and refusals. Because of the need to formalize the reviews of visa issuances beyond spot-checks, the Department said it will no longer be possible to review all visa refusals. Department regulations specify that a refusal must be reviewed without delay; that is, on the day of the refusal or as soon as is administratively possible. The final rule specifies that this will also apply to reviews of issuances.

The full text of the final rule is available at: http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/E6-10270.pdf.

Back to Top


15. USCIS Ombudsman Lists ‘Pervasive and Serious Problems’

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Ombudsman, Prakash Khatri, issued an annual report to the Senate and House of Representatives Judiciary Committees on June 29, 2006. The report lists “pervasive and serious problems” at USCIS, including, among others, backlogs and prolonged processing times, untimely processing and systemic problems with employment-based “green card” applications, limited availability of case status information, misdirected or unrecorded green cards, and delays caused by name checks and other security checks. The report includes 13 recommendations to the USCIS director.

The full text of the report is available at: http://www.dhs.gov/interweb/assetlibrary/CISOmbudsman_AnnualReport_2006.pdf.

Back to Top


16. Sign-On Letter Supports Immigration

Over 500 economists have signed on to the Open Institute’s June 19, 2006, “Open Letter on Immigration,” which notes the economic benefits to the U.S. of immigration. The letter, including the extensive list of signers, is at: http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=1727.
Back to Top


17. Google Launches New Government Information Search

Google U.S. Government Search provides a single location for searching across U.S. government information and keeping updated on government news. Users can choose to search for content located on either U.S. federal, state, and local government Web sites or the entire Web, from the same search box. Below the search box, the home page includes government-specific news content from both government agencies and press outlets. The page can be personalized by adding content feeds on government or other topics of interest.

The new Google government search is available at: http://www.google.com/help/about_usgovernmentsearch.html. At the bottom of the page, click on “About Google U.S. Government Search” for frequently asked questions about how to use the search.

Back to Top


18. Recent News from ABIL Members

ABIL members spoke and served on several panels at the American Immigration Lawyers Association’s annual conference, held this year in San Antonio, Texas, on June 21-24, 2006. Approximately 3,000 people attended the conference. ABIL members and topics they discussed included:

Edward R. Litwin: “Labor Certification-Based Immigration: Pre-Filing.”

Bernard P. Wolfsdorf: “Consular Processing — Part of the Admission Equation.”

Laura J. Danielson, Cyrus D. Mehta, Angelo A. Paparelli, and Stephen Yale-Loehr: “An Embarrassment of Riches: Immigration Lawyering in a 21st Century ‘Flat’ World.”

Cyrus D. Mehta: “Adjustment of Status vs. Consular Processing: Should I Stay or Should I Go?”

Charles H. Kuck: “Litigation for Business Immigration Lawyers” and “Expansion of Expedited Removal: Implementing USCIRF’s Recommendations.”

H. Ronald Klasko and Steven A. Clark: “PERM Workshop.”

Tapes of the conference presentations are available for purchase at: https://www.csctapes.com/tapes/aila2006.htm.

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2006-07-01 00:00:582019-09-19 01:10:55News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 2, No. 7 • July 01, 2006

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 2, No. 6 • June 01, 2006

June 01, 2006/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. H-1B Cap Reached – USCIS announced that the H-1B cap for fiscal year 2007 has been reached.

2. USCIS to Expand Premium Processing Service to Most Employment-Based Green Card Petitions – USCIS will soon open the agency’s premium processing service to nearly all employment-based green card applications.

3. Senate Passes Immigration Legislation, Compromise With House Remains Uncertain – The Senate has passed sweeping immigration reform legislation that includes both a guestworker program and enforcement components.

4. Many Hondurans, Nicaraguans in Danger of Losing Work Authorization; Salvadorans Face TPS Renewal Period at End of Summer – Hondurans and Nicaraguans who are re-registering for TPS after the June 1 re-registration deadline may submit their applications with a letter explaining a “good cause for failure to timely file.”

5. USCIS Reminds Adjustment Applicants to Obtain Advance Parole Before Summer Travel – Persons failing to do so may have their immigration benefit applications denied.

6. Hearings Focus on Physicians for Underserved Areas, Impact of Visa Delays – The House of Representatives recently held hearings on foreign doctors who work in underserved areas and the impact of visa processing delays on the arts, education, and American innovation.

7. DHS Cracks Down on Nonimmigrant Visa Overstays, Worksite Violations – The DHS is increasing visits to nonimmigrants with expired status and stepping up enforcement actions against employers.

8. Third Preference “Other Worker” Visa Category Becomes Unavailable – The employment-based third preference “Other Worker” green card category will remain unavailable for the remainder of the fiscal year.

9. Labor Dept. to Close America’s Job Bank – The Department of Labor has informed states that America’s Job Bank will close by June 30, 2007.

10. DOS Amends Regulations to Require Mexican Passport for BCC/Laser Visa Application – The presentation of a Mexican federal passport is now a necessary condition for Mexican citizens applying for combined Border Crossing Cards (BCCs) and B-1/B-2 visas (laser visas).

11. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members

Details:

1. H-1B Cap Reached

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced that as of May 26, 2006, all of the “regular” H-1B visa numbers for start dates effective October 1, 2006, have been used up. The H-1B cap for FY 2007 was 58,200; the agency also added back 6,100 unused FY 2006 H-1B1 visa numbers, for a total of 64,300.

Any additional petitions subject to the fiscal year 2007 H-1B annual cap received after May 26, 2006, will be rejected and returned along with the filing fee. Petitions that were received on May 26, 2006, are being subjected to a computer-generated random selection process to enable USCIS to apply the remaining number of H-1B visas available on that date to those petitions. Petitioners may resubmit their petitions when H-1B visas become available for FY 2008. The earliest date for filing an H-1B petition subject to the FY 2008 cap, with an employment start date of October 1, 2007, is April 1, 2007.

The first 20,000 H-1B petitions filed on behalf of those with U.S.-earned master’s or higher degrees are exempt from the fiscal year cap on available H-1B visas. The advanced degree cap could be met in September 2006, however. USCIS reports that it has received apprxoimately 5,830 exempt petitions in that category so far. For that reason, any such person who is eligible to file for H-1B status should do so immediately.

It is still possible to obtain H-1B status with an immediate start date for “new” employees who currently maintain H-1B status with another employer, or who previously have been in H-1B status in the past six years and subsequently have been absent from the U.S. for less than one year.

Institutions of higher education, nonprofits related or affiliated to such institutions, and nonprofit or governmental research organizations are exempt from the cap and may continue to obtain H-1B status for new employees.

USCIS also will continue to process petitions filed to: (1) extend the amount of time a current H-1B worker may remain in the U.S.; (2) change the terms of employment for current H-1B workers; (3) allow current H-1B workers to change employers; or (4) allow current H-1B workers to work concurrently in a second H-1B position.

The USCIS’s press release is at http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/publicaffairs/newsrels/FY07H1Bcap_060106PR.pdf. Additional information regarding the specific number of H-1B petitions processed is at: http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/services/tempbenefits/cap.htm.

Back to Top

2. USCIS to Expand Premium Processing Service to Most Employment-Based Green Card Petitions

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) published a notice in the Federal Register on May 23, 2006, that will soon open the agency’s premium processing service to nearly all Form I-140 employment-based immigrant worker petitions (also known as green card applications). The agency also will extend premium processing to certain Form I-539 applications to change or extend nonimmigrant status, as well as to Form I-765 applications to renew employment authorization for foreign nationals with pending employment-based applications for adjustment of status.

USCIS’s premium processing program allows petitioners and applicants to request expected adjudication of certain cases. Upon payment of a $1,000 fee, designated applications and petitions are slated for adjudication within 15 calendar days of filing. If the agency does not act on the case within the stated period — by issuing an approval, a denial or a request for evidence in the case — the $1,000 fee is refunded.

USCIS will extend premium processing service to Form I-765 applications to renew employment authorization for foreign nationals who have pending Form I-485 applications to adjust status that are supported by immigrant visa petitions in the EB-1 through EB-5 classifications.

In addition, USCIS will permit concurrent filing of Forms I-539 and I-765 for certain nonimmigrant classifications. Premium processing, if requested, will apply only to Form I-539. USCIS will not guarantee 15-day processing for an I-765 filed concurrently with a premium-processed I-539.

The USCIS premium processing notice is at: http://frwebgate5.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate.cgi?WAISdocID=398853149330+2+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve. A separate USCIS notice clarified that USCIS Service Centers will not accept filings for any of these form types under the premium processing service until a formal announcement is made on the USCIS Web site announcing the specific start dates for acceptance of the new form types. Until that date is established and announced, USCIS Service Centers will reject any premium process filings for I-140s, I-539s or I-765s. That USCIS clarification is at http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/publicaffairs/statements/PremProcess052406PN.pdf.

Back to Top

3. Senate Passes Immigration Legislation, Compromise With House Remains Uncertain

On May 25, 2006, after months of back-and-forth wrangling, the U.S. Senate passed S. 2611, a sweeping immigration reform package that includes both a guestworker program and border control and enforcement components. The House of Representatives passed its own version of immigration reform legislation last December (H.R. 4437). The House bill focuses on border enforcement and lacks a guestworker program. The two bills must be reconciled before a final bill can be enacted. In hopes of bringing the immigration reform legislation to a conclusion, Senate majority leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) is calling for swift negotiations with the House of Representatives.

Finding a compromise may be difficult because the two bills are so different. Rep. James Sensenbrenner, Jr. (R-Wis.), however, who will lead the House negotiators, signaled a general willingness to compromise: “I don’t think anything is a deal-breaker. We can’t have legal proceedings to deport 11 to 12 million people; that is evident.”

The Senate bill contains numerous business-related provisions. For example, the Senate bill would:

  • Raise the cap on H-1B nonimmigrant visas for highly educated temporary workers to 115,000 — with a flexible market-based annual adjustment.
  • Raise the employment-based green card cap and exempt key categories of workers from the cap.
  • Provide exemptions for both H-1B and employment-based green card caps for certain workers who have earned an advanced degree in science, technology, engineering or mathematics.
  • Allot two-thirds of the 50,000 green cards granted annually by the diversity visa lottery to those with advanced degrees.
  • Establish a new electronic employment verification system that would replace the current paper-based I-9 system.

Meanwhile, the Bush administration said the “five clear objectives of comprehensive immigration reform” include “securing our borders, creating a temporary worker program, making it easier for employers to verify employment eligibility and continuing to hold them to account for the legal status of workers they hire, dealing with the millions of illegal immigrants who are already here, and honoring the great American tradition of the melting pot.”

A White House fact sheet on comprehensive immigration reform is at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/05/20060515-7.html.

Back to Top

4. Many Hondurans, Nicaraguans in Danger of Losing Work Authorization; Salvadorans Face TPS Renewal Period at End of Summer

As of May 25, 2006, fewer than half of Hondurans in the U.S. under the temporary protected status (TPS) program have re-registered to meet the June 1 re-registration deadline, sources say. Many of the 75,000 eligible Hondurans reportedly are awaiting immigration legislation they believe is imminent, and they do not want to spend several hundred dollars to renew their TPS if they may have a chance to apply for permanent resident status under new legislation. Lawyers and advocates warn that many could lose their work authorization as a result, placing them in illegal status after their TPS expires on July 5, 2007, and thereby rendering them potentially ineligible for citizenship in the future. “It is a serious problem. We believe they are wasting their opportunity to continue having an employment authorization document,” said Antonio Amaya, executive director of La Comunidad, Inc., an immigrant services organization in Massachusetts.

There also are about 4,000 Nicaraguans in the U.S. under TPS, with the same deadline as the Hondurans. Only 1.700 had renewed their TPS as of May 25. The later re-registration period for approximately 225,000 Salvadorans in the U.S. under TPS is expected at the end of this summer. Advocates report that Salvadorans seem more aware of the risk of allowing their TPS status to lapse. Salvadoran TPS expires on September 9, 2007.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) instructs Hondurans and Nicaraguans who are re-registering for TPS after the June 1 re-registration deadline to submit their applications with a letter explaining a “good cause for failure to timely file” (by USPS or other carrier) to:

Vermont Service Center
Attn: TPS Good Cause Exception
75 Lower Welden Street
St. Albans, VT 05479-0001

Additional information and details on the TPS requirements and deadlines for the three groups, including information on late initial registration and links to the relevant Federal Register notices, are available at: http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/osc/htm/work_extension.html and http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/services/tps_hond.htm.

Back to Top

5. USCIS Reminds Adjustment Applicants to Obtain Advance Parole Before Summer Travel

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services issued a statement on May 24, 2006, reminding those who have: (1) been granted temporary protected status; (2) applied for adjustment of status; (3) applied for relief under the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act; or (4) filed asylum applications that they must apply for and obtain advance parole (permission to re-enter the U.S.) at a USCIS Service Center before traveling abroad. Persons failing to do so may have their immigration benefit applications denied.

The announcement is available at: http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/publicaffairs/newsrels/TravAdvisory052406PR.pdf. Additional information on how to apply for various travel documents is at: http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/howdoi/travdoc.htm. The I-131 Application for Travel Document is at: http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/formsfee/forms/files/I-131.pdf.

Back to Top

6. Hearings Focus on Physicians for Underserved Areas, Impact of Visa Delays

The House Judiciary committee held a hearing on May 18, 2006, on H.R. 4997, the Physicians for Underserved Areas Act. The bill would reauthorize the J-1 visa waiver program, which provides opportunities for graduates of foreign medical schools who have trained in U.S. medical residency programs on J-1 cultural exchange visas to stay in the U.S. if they serve for three years in a designated health professional shortage area. Such areas are located in both rural and urban areas.

Leslie G. Aronovitz, Director of Health Care for the U.S. Government Accountability Office, (GAO) testified that the use of J-1 waivers remains a major means of placing physicians in underserved areas of the U.S., with more than 1,000 waivers requested in each of the past three years for physicians to practice in nearly every state. About 44 percent of states’ waiver requests in fiscal year 2005 were for physicians to practice exclusively in primary care, while about 41 percent were for physicians to practice in nonprimary care specialties such as anesthesiology or cardiology. An additional seven percent were for physicians to practice psychiatry. More than three-fourths of the states’ waiver requests were for physicians to work in hospitals or private practices. The GAO also noted that over 6,100 foreign physicians with J-1 visas took part in U.S. graduate medical education programs during academic year 2004-05, which was about 40 percent lower than was the case a decade earlier. The reasons for the decline are not completely understood.

The GAO noted that some states filled the per-state 30-waiver limit, but others reported needing more. Some states that had a sufficient allotment expressed their willingness under certain circumstances to share their allotment, but such redistribution would require legislation.

The GAO’s testimony is at: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06773t.pdf. The hearing testimony on physicians in underserved areas is at: http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings.aspx?ID=142.

Also, the House Government Reform committee held a hearing recently on the impact of visa processing delays on the arts, education, and American innovation. Committee chairman Tom Davis (R-Va.) noted that U.S. businesses need to be able to bring foreign partners and customers in on short notice; U.S. universities need to continue attracting top foreign students, many of whom will choose to stay in the U.S. and bolster the economy as a result; and “the U.S. cultural scene will continue to remain vibrant only as long as foreign artists are able to bring their work to American stages and galleries.” He also noted that trade shows and arts presenters in particular “represent a significant segment of the U.S. economy, comprised largely of small businesses that don’t always have the resources to cope with the significant additional expense of an inefficient visa process.”

The hearing testimony on visa delays, which includes a statement by famed cellist Yo-Yo Ma, among others, is available at: http://reform.house.gov/GovReform/Hearings/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=41471.

Back to Top

7. DHS Cracks Down on Nonimmigrant Visa Overstays, Worksite Violations

According to reports from the field, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has been visiting those whose nonimmigrant visa status has expired, even if such a person has obtained another status. In some cases, ICE agents are unable to verify the new status. Meanwhile, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced last month that it is stepping up enforcement efforts against employers who knowingly hire undocumented workers. In addition, the DHS plans to work with Congress to build employer compliance systems. “Employers who want to stay within the law need a clear set of rules to follow. ICE and DHS will seek to develop an administrative regulatory program to provide clearer guidance to employers,” the DHS said.

For more on the DHS’s new efforts, see http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/display?content=5546.

Back to Top

8. Third Preference “Other Worker” Visa Category Becomes Unavailable

The Department of State announced that continued heavy demand for visa numbers in the employment-based third preference category for unskilled workers will result in the 5,000 annual numerical limit for that category being reached during the month of May. Therefore, the employment-based third preference “Other Worker” category has become “unavailable” for June and will remain so for the remainder of the fiscal year.

The Visa Bulletin for June is available at: http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_2924.html.

Back to Top

9. Labor Dept. to Close America’s Job Bank

Citing costs that outweigh benefits, the Department of Labor recently informed states that America’s Job Bank (AJB) will be phased out gradually and will close by June 30, 2007. AJB, which aggregates job listings online of 2,000 state employment offices nationwide, lists more than 682,000 resumes and 2.1 million job openings. “The Department recognizes there will be a periodic need for a national job board due to unique circumstances, such as the recent dislocations related to the hurricanes in the Gulf Coast,” the notice said. “It is the Department’s assessment that it will be more cost effective to contract for this type of service with the private sector on an ‘as needed basis.’ ”

AJB is often used by lower-skilled workers seeking jobs through state agencies and by employers seeking such workers to meet labor certification recruitment requirements or to demonstrate good-faith compliance with federal hiring guidelines.

AJB is at: http://www.ajb.dni.us/.

Back to Top

10. DOS Amends Regulations to Require Mexican Passport for BCC/Laser Visa Application

On May 30, 2006, the Department of State (DOS) issued a final rule, effective the same day, to require the presentation of a Mexican federal passport as a necessary condition for Mexican citizens applying for combined Border Crossing Cards (BCCs) and B-1/B-2 visas (laser visas). The final rule also removes the conditions under which certain beneficiaries of waivers of ineligibility may receive laser visas.

The DOS noted that most Mexican visitors to the U.S., whether traveling to the border region or beyond, receive a laser visa. The DOS and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services jointly administer the laser visa program; the DOS issues the combined BCC/B-1/2 under its exclusive authority over visa issuance. The DOS cited national security concerns, among other reasons, for the change in documentation requirements.

The full text of the final rule is available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/E6-8288.pdf.

Back to Top

11. Recent News from ABIL Members

Mark A. Ivener, Managing Partner of Ivener & Fullmer LLP, has been named one of the top 100 wealth advisors and managers in the Americas by Citywealth magazine’s poll of 2,000 wealth advisors around the world. Mr. Ivener, the only immigration attorney on the list, has practiced immigration law exclusively for more than 30 years and has authored five books on the subject. Ivener & Fullmer is headquartered in Los Angeles, with offices in New York, Tokyo, and Vancouver. Mr. Ivener told Citywealth that immigration issues “can tremendously impact foreign nationals of high net worth, and an important green card option is often overlooked. For example, through [a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services] Regional Center, an individual can apply under the EB-5 investor category by making an investment in a real estate limited partnership, and greatly accelerate the process of obtaining a green card.” For more information on Ivener & Fullmer, see http://www.usworkvisa.com.

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2006-06-01 00:00:052019-09-19 01:14:16News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 2, No. 6 • June 01, 2006

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 2, No. 5 • May 01, 2006

May 01, 2006/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. Immigration Reform Action Stalls in Congress; ‘SKIL’ Bill Introduced – The Senate has failed to pass any immigration reform proposals, including legislation to establish a guestworker program. Sen. John Cornyn, however, has just introduced the “SKIL” (Securing Knowledge Innovation and Leadership) bill.

2. ICE Steps Up Enforcement, Arresting Managers and Over a Thousand Employees of Pallet Company – ICE agents arrested several managers of IFCO Systems North America, Inc. (IFCO), the largest pallet services company in the United States, and many unauthorized workers.

3. State Dept. Proposes to Eliminate Specialty Occupation Distinction for J Trainees – The State Dept. has issued a proposed rule to revise its training program regulations under the Exchange Visitor Program to eliminate the distinction between “non-specialty occupations” and “specialty occupations.”

4. DHS Wants to Mine SSA Data – In an effort to identify undocumented workers and their employers, the DHS is seeking authority from Congress to mine Social Security Administration databases for information.

5. German Emergency/Temporary Passports No Longer Valid for Travel to U.S. Under VWP – As of May 1, 2006, German emergency and temporary passports will no longer be valid for travel to the U.S. under the Visa Waiver Program.

6. Temporary Protected Status Extended for Honduras, Nicaragua – The TPS designation for Honduras and Nicaragua has been extended until July 5, 2007.

7. State Dept. Reports on China, India Visa Availability, “Other Worker” Category Retrogression for May – The State Department has retrogressed the employment third preference “Other Worker” cut-off date.

8. USCIS Establishes Records Verification Directorate – USCIS has established a new National Security and Records Verification Directorate.

9. GAO Recommends Measures to Reduce Visa Wait Times at Consular Posts – The GAO is calling for a comprehensive assessment of staffing requirements for visa operations worldwide.

10. Fewer H-1B Numbers Used Than Expected for FY 2007 So Far – H-1B numbers are being used up more slowly so far than many expected for FY 2007, although early filing is still recommended.

11. Recent Articles & News from ABIL Members – Recent Articles & News from ABIL Members


Details:

1. Immigration Reform Action Stalls in Congress; ‘SKIL’ Bill Introduced

As of press time, the Senate failed to pass any of the sweeping immigration reform proposals we reported on last month, including legislation to establish a guestworker program, although action remains possible this session. Any legalization program that is enacted will put demands on U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, generating backlogs. If such a provision becomes law, it will be important to file for permanent residence before such backlogs develop.

It is unclear whether further progress will be possible this session on comprehensive immigration reform, although Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) said he wants the Senate to pass such legislation by Memorial Day. Such legislation then would have to be reconciled with the House of Representatives version in conference committee, and passed by both houses. “It would be a tough conference, candidly, with the House, but we were able to work through the Patriot Act although there were big disagreements,” Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, reportedly said on CNN’s “Late Edition.”

On April 24, President George W. Bush gave a speech in California on immigration reform. Once again, he supported a guestworker program, among other measures. Voice of America quoted President Bush as noting that: “[i]t is really hard to enforce the border with people sneaking across to take jobs. Doesn’t it make sense to have a rational temporary worker plan that says you don’t need to sneak across the border?” He said in his radio address on April 22 that “[i]n the coming weeks, I’ll press Congress to pass comprehensive immigration reform that secures our border, enforces our laws, meets the needs of our economy, and upholds our highest ideals.” The Associated Pressreported on April 26 that at a recent White House meeting convened to help push immigration reform action in Congress, President Bush said he believes undocumented workers should have a chance to obtain legal status without leaving the country but does not endorse such a measure publicly because of opposition from House Republicans. “I understand that he wants to maintain latitude as he heads into negotiations with the House,” said Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who supports that proposal.

Meanwhile, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) has just introduced the “SKIL” (Securing Knowledge Innovation and Leadership) bill shortly. Among other things, the SKIL bill would increase the annual H-1B cap from 65,000 to 115,000, and exempt certain professionals from the H-1B and immigrant visa caps. The bill also would raise the latter cap from 140,000 to 290,000. A pre-certification program would be created for employers filing multiple applications with no history of abuse. Pre-certification would allow such employers to file their applications on a separate, more streamlined, track.

The Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers signed a letter supporting the SKIL bill that is being circulated by the Compete America Coalition. “Being able to recruit and retain foreign-born talent — including those who are educated in U.S. universities — is critical to our nation’s ability to remain competitive, and we encourage you to support this legislation and enact reforms this year,” the letter says. For more information, or to add your organization’s name to the letter, e-mail sboyd@nam.org (Sandra Boyd, Vice President, Human Resources Policy, National Association of Manufacturers), and include information on how the organization should be listed and clear permission to add it to the letter. For more information, see http://www.competeamerica.org/.

Back to Top


2. ICE Steps Up Enforcement, Arresting Managers and Over a Thousand Employees of Pallet Company

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents arrested seven current and former managers of IFCO Systems North America, Inc. (IFCO), the largest pallet services company in the United States headquartered in Houston, Texas, pursuant to criminal complaints issued on April 19, 2006. The managers were charged with conspiring to transport, harbor, and encourage and induce unauthorized workers to reside in the United States for commercial advantage and private financial gain. The conspiracy charge carries a penalty of up to 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000 for each worker with respect to whom the violation takes place, ICE explained. Two other IFCO employees were arrested on criminal charges relating to fraudulent documents.

In addition to the criminal arrests, ICE agents conducted “consent” searches or executed criminal search warrants at more than 40 IFCO plants and related locations in 26 states that resulted in the apprehension of approximately 1,187 undocumented IFCO employees.

According to a government affidavit filed in the Northern District of New York, the investigation began in February 2005 when ICE agents received information that IFCO workers in Guilderland, New York, were witnessed ripping up their W-2 tax forms and that an IFCO assistant general manager had explained that these workers were undocumented, had fake Social Security cards and did not intend to file tax returns.

Subsequent investigation revealed that IFCO officials transported undocumented employees to and from work, paid rent for their housing, and deducted money from their monthly paychecks to cover these expenses. Former IFCO employees also said it was common practice for IFCO to hire workers who lacked Social Security cards or produced bogus identification cards.

The affidavit also alleges that IFCO officials knowingly hired an undocumented worker who was an informant for ICE. In numerous recorded conversations, IFCO officials reimbursed this person for obtaining fraudulent identity documents for other undocumented employees, used the person to recruit other unauthorized workers, and advised the person and other undocumented employees on how to avoid law enforcement detection, the affidavit alleges.

Meanwhile, DHS Assistant Secretary Julie Myers’ op-ed, “Expect More Arrests,” was published in USA Today on April 26, 2006. Ms. Myers said DHS is bolstering its criminal investigations against employers who hire unauthorized workers. For many employers, she said fines had become just another cost of doing business. “More robust criminal cases against unprincipled employers are a much more effective deterrent than fines. The prospect of 10 years in federal prison or a federal forfeiture carries much sharper teeth. We believe this is the future of worksite enforcement,” Ms. Myers said.

Additional information on the case is available at http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/display?content=5547.

Back to Top


3. State Dept. Proposes to Eliminate Specialty Occupation Distinction for J Trainees

The Department of State is proposing to revise its training program regulations under the J nonimmigrant exchange visitor program to eliminate the distinction between “non-specialty occupations” and “specialty occupations.” Also, a new 12-month “intern” program is proposed to permit recent foreign graduates of degree-granting post-secondary accredited educational institutions to come to the United States to pursue work-based learning experiences in the fields in which they received their degrees.

A requirement that sponsors complete an individualized Form DS-7002 Training/Internship Placement Plan for each trainee and intern prior to issuing a Form DS-2019 to the trainee or intern is also proposed. The Department plans to publish a notice regarding the design of the proposed Form DS-7002, soliciting public comment regarding all recordkeeping, reporting, and data collection units.

The proposed regulation would require that trainees have at least three years of previous related work experience in their occupational fields before being eligible to participate in the Exchange Visitor Program. The regulation also would require that trainees have a minimum TOEFL (Test of English as a Foreign Language) score of 550 or its equivalent.

The Department will accept comments on the proposed regulation from the public until June 6, 2006. Comments should be sent to the office designated in the supplementary information to the proposed rule, which is available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/E6-4946.pdf.

Back to Top


4. DHS Wants to Mine SSA Data

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in an effort to identify undocumented workers and their employers, is seeking authority from Congress to mine Social Security Administration databases for information on Social Security numbers that do not match names, GovExec.com reported on April 20, 2006. “One of the key challenges that supports illegal migration is abuse of our Social Security system and the Social Security document,” DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff said at a news conference. “We’ve been urging Congress to pass legislation, now before the Senate, that would grant the Department of Homeland Security some carefully crafted access to Social Security no-match data so we can detect those employers who are systematically employing workers, despite the fact that there’s an obvious mismatch between the names and the Social Security numbers in question.”
Back to Top


5. German Emergency/Temporary Passports No Longer Valid for Travel to U.S. Under VWP

As of May 1, 2006, German emergency and temporary passports are no longer valid for travel to the U.S. under the Visa Waiver Program, the U.S. Embassy in Germany reported. Holders of these passports who intend to travel to or through the United States must either obtain a regular German passport for Visa Waiver Program travel, or obtain a visa.

Additional information is available at http://www.usembassy.de/germany/visa/vwp_faqs.html and http://germany.usembassy.gov/germany/temporary_passports.html.

Back to Top


6. Temporary Protected Status Extended for Honduras, Nicaragua

The temporary protected status (TPS) designation for Honduras and Nicaragua has been extended until July 5, 2007. Given the large numbers affected, many re-registrants may not receive an extension sticker or new employment authorization document (EAD) until after their current EADs expire on July 5, 2006. Accordingly, the validity of EADs issued under the TPS designations has been extended automatically until January 5, 2007. The notices explain how TPS beneficiaries and their employers may determine which EADs are automatically extended. The 60-day re-registration period began on April 1, 2006, and will remain in effect until June 1, 2006. To facilitate processing, applicants are strongly encouraged to file as soon as possible.

The notices are available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/E6-4685.pdf (Honduras) and http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/E6-4686.pdf (Nicaragua).

Back to Top


7. State Dept. Reports on China, India Visa Availability, “Other Worker” Category Retrogression for May

The Department of State noted in its Visa Bulletin for May 2006 that continued heavy demand for visa numbers (particularly for adjustment of status cases at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services offices) has brought allocations close to the 5,000 annual numerical limit for “other worker” green cards in the employment-based third preference category. The Department said it has been necessary as a result to retrogress the employment third preference “Other Worker” cut-off date in an effort to limit future demand. If the annual limit is reached, it will become necessary to make the category unavailable for the remaining months of the fiscal year, the Department said.

The Department also noted that there has been a significant amount of forward movement in the China-mainland born and India employment first and second preference cut-off dates during recent months. This was done in an effort to generate demand for numbers. It cannot be assumed, the Department warned, that these cut-off dates will continue to advance at this pace during the remainder of the fiscal year. “It remains to be seen how heavy the demand for visa numbers by applicants from those areas will be in the coming months,” the Department said.

The latest Visa Bulletin is available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_2868.html.

Back to Top


8. USCIS Establishes Records Verification Directorate

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on April 10, 2006, that it has established a new National Security and Records Verification Directorate. This new Directorate is made up of two divisions formerly embedded within the Domestic Operations Directorate, the Fraud Detection and National Security (FDNS) Division and the Records Division, along with a new Verifications Division.

FDNS functions as USCIS’s law enforcement liaison and handles the agency’s intelligence work, fraud detection and, as part of the new Directorate, the national security cases previously handled in Domestic Operations. The Records Division handles the storage and retrieval of close to 100 million immigration records, virtually all paper-based. The new Verification Division now encompasses the Basic Pilot and SAVE (Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements) volunteer employment and status verification programs, which allows participating employers to confirm the employment eligibility of newly hired employees.

The National Security and Records Verification Directorate will be led by Acting Associate Director Janis Sposato, a 31-year veteran of the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security, and the former Deputy Associate Director of the Domestic Operations Directorate.

Back to Top


9. GAO Recommends Measures to Reduce Visa Wait Times at Consular Posts

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO)’s new report, Border Security: Reassessment of Consular Resource Requirements Could Help Address Visa Delays, notes that applicants have faced extensive wait times at some consular posts. New post-9/11 security requirements have increased delays. Additional factors, the GAO said, may include a resurgence in visa demands and facility limitations at some posts, as well as a lack of needed personnel. Although the Department of State has increased hiring of consular officers, the GAO called for a comprehensive assessment of staffing requirements for visa operations worldwide. The report includes statistics on maximum wait times for temporary business and tourism visa interview appointments; the longest is at the post in Chennai, India, with a maximum wait time of 168 days. The full text of the report is available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06542t.pdf.
Back to Top


10. Fewer H-1B Numbers Used Than Expected for FY 2007 So Far

As noted in last month’s issue, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) began accepting H-1B filings under the fiscal year 2007 cap beginning on April 1, 2006. H-1B numbers are being used up more slowly so far than many expected, although filing as early as possible is still recommended. As of April 24, 2006, USCIS reported that only 12,713 standard H-1B numbers and only 2,358 advanced degree H-1Bs have been allocated.

For more on proposed H-1B legislation, see the first article in this issue.

To monitor the count, see http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/services/tempbenefits/cap.htm.

Back to Top


11. Recent Articles & News from ABIL Members

ABIL co-sponsors seminar on labor certification. The Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers will co-sponsor a seminar with the Association of the Bar of the City of New York on “Labor Certification Fundamentals and Best Practice Under the New PERM System to Benefit Your Client and Your Immigration Practice,” on Wednesday and Thursday, May 10-11, 2006, from 6 to 9 p.m. at the New York City Bar, 42 West 44th Street. The program chair is Cyrus D. Mehta; moderators include H. Ronald Klasko and Stephen Yale-Loehr. Among the faculty are ABIL members Charles H. Kuck, Edward R. Litwin, and Angelo A. Paparelli. For more information or to register, call (212) 382-6663 or see https://www.nycbar.org/CLE/show_course.php?cnameid=1213.
Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2006-05-01 00:00:402019-09-19 01:17:11News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 2, No. 5 • May 01, 2006

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 2, No. 4 • April 01, 2006

April 01, 2006/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. Immigration Reform Action Heats Up in Congress – The Senate is poised to debate and seek compromise on a variety of sweeping immigration reform proposals.

2. USCIS Notifies Employers of Filing Changes – USCIS announced changes to the filing locations for foreign worker petitions.

3. USCIS Issues Sample H-2B Attestation – USCIS has issued a sample H-2B returning worker attestation for employers to follow when filing petitions including returning H-2B workers.

4. State Dept. Announces Changes in Earliest Issuance Dates for F, M Visas – Students applying for certain initial-entry visas now may be issued these visas up to 120 days before the program start date; the State Dept. also announced a plan to allow initial-entry students to apply for admission to the U.S. up to 45 days before their program start dates.

5. Reminders Issued on Eve of New H-1B Filing Period – USCIS issued reminders of important regulatory requirements in anticipation of the agency’s acceptance of H-1B filings under the fiscal year 2007 cap beginning on April 1, 2006.

6. Cut-Off Dates Advance in Several Employment Preference Categories – Cut-off dates for the China and India employment-based first preference (EB-1) categories have advanced six months.

7. Labor Dept. Releases FAQs on Labor Certifications – The Department of Labor has released guidance on procedures for requesting a duplicate labor certification when the original has been lost or misplaced.

8. New Report Counters Perception That H-1B Workers Harm U.S. Labor – The National Foundation for American Policy released a policy brief countering the perception that the entry of skilled H-1B professionals harms native U.S. workers.

9. DHS Releases Report on L-1 Visa Fraud; Other Reports Rebut Allegations – The Department of Homeland Security’s Inspector General’s controversial new report charges that the L-1 program is vulnerable to fraud in several respects.

10. GAO Issues Report on Benefit Fraud – The GAO’s new report recommends that USCIS implement additional internal fraud controls and best practices, and develop a strategy for implementing a sanctions program.

11. Recent Articles & News from ABIL Members – Recent Articles & News from ABIL Members


Details:

1. Immigration Reform Action Heats Up in Congress

As of press time, the full Senate is debating and seeking compromise on a variety of sweeping immigration reform proposals, including border enforcement measures, work authorization verification provisions, and a temporary worker plan. The Judiciary Committee marked up the legislation on March 27, 2006. Sen. Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) said the goal is to pass a bill by April 7, which would have to be reconciled with the House version. The timeline remains uncertain, however, because the legislation continues to generate controversy among lawmakers torn between the appeal of get-tough measures and concerns about alienating Latino voters.

During the mark-up on March 27, the Judiciary Committee passed a variety of amendments. Among the more noteworthy are amendments to create a temporary worker program, which President George Bush has long sought, and to apply a one-year limit on an initial L visa if the worker is coming to open a new office in the U.S., after which the worker would have to submit evidence supporting the viability of the office before applying for an extension of L status. New F-4 student visa provisions also were approved that would, among other things, raise the application fee from $1,000 to $2,000.

The National Association of Manufacturers weighed in with a letter to the Senate recommending that “[a]ny new legislation should include a market-based cap on H-1B visas; exemptions from EB caps for an expanded group of workers that are needed for their knowledge or contributions to innovation in fields like science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM); and…a direct path to green cards for STEM advanced degree graduates of U.S. universities.” Meanwhile, the American Civil Liberties Union and an assortment of other groups from both sides of the political aisle, including privacy rights groups, opposed a provision that would mandate the use of the Basic Pilot employment verification database by all United States employers to verify the work-eligibility of both current employees and future hires, which the organizations said would lead to privacy violations and a national identification system.

Some of the enforcement-related proposals that the Judiciary Committee did not pass included making unlawful presence in the U.S. a felony and criminalizing those who aid the undocumented. Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) had opined that such provisions would “literally criminalize the Good Samaritan and probably even Jesus himself.” The proposed legislation sparked some of the largest protests in U.S. history. “I’ve been on the force 38 years and I’ve never seen a rally this big,” said Louis Gray, Jr., incident commander at the March 25 rally held in Los Angeles, at which an estimated 500,000 people turned out.

The earlier text of the various pieces of the proposed legislation can be found at http://thomas.loc.gov (type the bill number in the search field): H.R. 4437 (Sensenbrenner bill); S. 1438 (Cornyn-Kyl bill); S. 2454 (Frist bill) (PDF available at http://frist.senate.gov/_files/031706bill.pdf); and S. 1033 (Kennedy-McCain bill). A PDF of the unnumbered Specter bill is available at http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=18639.

In addition, the House immigration subcommittee held a hearing on March 30 to discuss raising the H-1B cap. In other congressional news, a House panel approved a variety of measures to reform and strengthen management of the Department of Homeland Security. An amendment to merge the Customs and Border Protection and Immigration and Customs Enforcement agencies was withdrawn after an agreement to hold a hearing on the subject. A report by the DHS’s Inspector General on the proposal is available at http://www.dhs.gov/interweb/assetlibrary/OIG_06-04_Nov05.pdf. The DHS reform legislation has been sent to the full House Committee on Homeland Security for consideration. More details are available at http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0306/031606c1.htm.

Back to Top


2. USCIS Notifies Employers of Filing Changes

On March 24, 2006, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced changes to the filing locations for two popular employer-sponsored immigration forms. Beginning April 1, 2006, employers filing a Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker (Form I-129) should mail it to the Vermont Service Center. Also beginning April 1, 2006, employers filing an Immigrant Petition for an Alien Worker (Form I-140) should mail it to the Nebraska Service Center. Employers should file any accompanying forms at these same centralized locations.

USCIS explained that these changes mark the first phase of an initiative to use centralized filing and “bi-specialized” adjudication. USCIS plans to align similar workloads between two “sister” service centers. After April 1, the Vermont and California Service Centers will process all I-129s and related dependent applications, and the Nebraska and Texas Service Centers will process all I-140s and related permanent residence applications. Applicants and petitioners should note that the filing location for the form type is not necessarily the Service Center that will decide the case; the “sister” service center may perform the actual processing. Applicants will be sent a receipt notice from the service center that will process their cases.

USCIS will continue to process cases received before April 1 using pre-existing procedures. Once the amended filing instructions take effect on April 1, the agency will not reject any I-129s or I-140s sent to the incorrect service center. Instead, USCIS will accept the filing, redirect it to the correct location, and honor the initial receipt date. The new filing locations do not affect other aspects of the forms’ instructions and do not change the forms themselves. USCIS will continue to honor previous versions of the forms.

Additional details, such as information on premium processing and where to file dependent applications when the principal application has already been filed, are included in a USCIS fact sheet available at http://uscis.gov/graphics/publicaffairs/factsheets/BiSpecPh01_24Mar06FS.pdf.

Back to Top


3. USCIS Issues Sample H-2B Attestation

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a sample H-2B returning worker attestation on March 16, 2006, for employers to follow when filing petitions including returning H-2B workers. Petitions for returning H-2B workers do not count toward the congressionally mandated biannual H-2B cap. The H-2B category is for temporary nonprofessional workers.

To qualify as a returning worker, a worker must have counted against the H-2B numerical cap during any one of the three fiscal years before the fiscal year of the approved start date of the H-2B petition. For example, to qualify as a returning worker for fiscal year 2006, a worker must have counted against the H-2B cap between October 1, 2002, and September 30, 2005.

The sample attestation is available at http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/formsfee/forms/files/H2B_Attestation.pdf.

Back to Top


4. State Dept. Announces Changes in Earliest Issuance Dates for F, M Visas

The Department of State (DOS) recently announced that persons applying for initial-entry F-1, F-2, M-1 and M-2 visas now may be issued these visas up to 120 days before the program start date as listed on their I-20s, although such students may not enter the U.S. more than 30 days in advance of the beginning of studies. These changes apply only to initial-entry students; continuing students may apply for new F or M visas at any time, as long as they have been maintaining student status and their SEVIS records are current. Continuing students may enter the U.S. at any time before their classes start.

The DOS also announced a plan to allow initial-entry students to apply for admission to the U.S. up to 45 days before their program start dates, although the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) must publish a regulation to implement this change. The Department of State said it would notify posts when the DHS does so. Until then, posts were instructed to continue informing initial-entry students that they may not enter the U.S. more than 30 days before their program start dates.

The DOS’s announcement, which also includes information on J visas, is available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/laws/telegrams/telegrams_2843.html.

Back to Top


5. Reminders Issued on Eve of New H-1B Filing Period

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued reminders of important regulatory requirements in anticipation of the agency’s acceptance of H-1B filings under the fiscal year 2007 cap beginning on April 1, 2006. H-1B petitioners should keep these requirements in mind to avoid delays in processing and possible requests for evidence.

USCIS noted that if work is to be performed in more than one location, H-1B petitioners must provide a detailed itinerary of the dates and places where the work will be performed. For example, a labor contractor or consultant who hires H-1B workers to work at client sites must provide in advance an itinerary with the dates and places where the worker will perform services for the clients.

Also, in situations in which an H-1B worker is changing to an employer other than the one for which the initial H-1B petition was approved, the worker must demonstrate that he or she performed work for the original petitioning employer for a “significant length of time.” If the H-1B worker is processing abroad, USCIS will work with the Department of State to ensure that the same level of scrutiny is applied to consular-processed H-1Bs.

The reminder notice is available at http://uscis.gov/graphics/publicaffairs/statements/H1Bnotice_24Mar06PN.pdf.

Back to Top


6. Cut-Off Dates Advance in Several Employment Preference Categories

The Department of State announced in the April Visa Bulletin that cut-off dates for the China employment-based first preference (EB-1) category have advanced six months, to January 1, 2004. The India EB-1 category also has moved ahead six months, to January 1, 2005. Six-month advances are also noted in the employment-based second preference category (EB-2) for both China (January 1, 2003) and India (July 1, 2002). All other EB-1 and EB-2 categories remain Current. The full text of the April Visa Bulletin is available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_2847.html.
Back to Top


7. Labor Dept. Releases FAQs on Labor Certifications

The Department of Labor has released guidance on procedures for requesting a duplicate labor certification when the original has been lost or misplaced. The guidance is available at http://workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/foreign/pdf/perm_faqs_3-20-06.pdf. Other recent FAQs on labor certifications are available at http://workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/foreign/pdf/perm_faqs_2-21-06.pdf and http://workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/foreign/pdf/perm_faqs_2-14-06.pdf. The full set of PERM FAQs in PDF format is available for download at http://workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/foreign/ (scroll to Quick Links).
Back to Top


8. New Report Counters Perception That H-1B Workers Harm U.S. Labor

The National Foundation for American Policy released a policy brief countering the perception that the entry of skilled H-1B professionals harms native U.S. workers. The brief discusses common misconceptions and fallacies that affect people’s understanding of high-skilled immigration, and research showing no negative impact of H-1B professionals on native workers’ opportunities and wages. The policy brief, H-1B Professionals and Wages: Setting the Record Straight, is available at http://www.nfap.com/researchactivities/articles/NFAPPolicyBriefH1BProfessionalsAndWages0306.pdf.
Back to Top


9. DHS Releases Report on L-1 Visa Fraud; Other Reports Rebut Allegations

The Department of Homeland Security’s Inspector General’s new report, Review of Vulnerabilities and Potential Abuses of the L-1 Visa Program, charges that the L-1 program is vulnerable to fraud in several respects. For example, adjudicators “find it difficult to be confident” that a firm truly intends to use an imported worker in a managerial or executive capacity as claimed. Also, “specialized knowledge” is so broadly defined that adjudicators “believe they have little choice but to approve almost all petitions.” Further, adjudicators have little ability to evaluate the substantiality of foreign operations, and the program encompasses petitioners who do not yet have their first U.S. office and permits petitioners to transfer themselves to the U.S. The report makes several recommendations, including that U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) establish a procedure to obtain overseas verification of pending H and L petitions by Department of State officers; that USCIS explore with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement whether experienced criminal investigators assigned abroad could check the bona fides of L petitions submitted by petitioners in the countries in which the officers are assigned; and that USCIS seek “legislative clarification” of various terms, concepts, and criteria used in the L program.

The Inspector General’s report, including USCIS’s responses to the Inspector General’s recommendations, is available at http://www.dhs.gov/interweb/assetlibrary/OIG_06-22_Jan06.pdf.

The National Foundation for American Policy issued a report on the L visa program that questions aspects of the Inspector General’s recommendations and counters claims of widespread abuse. That report, Understanding L-1 Visas and the Recent OIG Report, is available at http://www.nfap.com/researchactivities/articles/NFAPPolicyBriefUnderstandingL1Visas0306.pdf.

The Global Personnel Alliance (GPA) reiterated in a rebuttal to the Inspector General’s report that there is no widespread evidence of L program misuse and noted that the Inspector General’s office did not speak to any users of the L-1 program. Had it done so, GPA said, it would have found that L-1 users have had petitions rejected for incorrect or unclear reasons and have been subjected to repeated requests for additional supporting evidence and required to make trips overseas to satisfy consular officers’ skepticism. The report also notes that smaller businesses, such as those started by a handful of managers and executives sent to the U.S. to expand operations, provide much of the new employment available to U.S. workers. The GPA’s report, Mixed Messages in DHS Office of Inspector General’s Report on L-1 Program, is available at http://www.aila.org/content/fileviewer.aspx?docid=18810&linkid=143200. For more on the importance of small business to American enterprise and invention, see Inventors, Inventions, and Innovative Small Business, http://www.sba.gov/advo/factsinventors06_03.pdf.

Back to Top


10. GAO Issues Report on Benefit Fraud

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO)’s new report, “Immigration Benefits: Additional Controls and a Sanctions Strategy Could Enhance DHS’s Ability to Control Benefit Fraud,” recommends that U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services implement additional internal fraud controls and best practices, and develop a strategy for implementing a sanctions program that includes a mechanism for assessing the effectiveness and considering the costs and benefits of sanctions, including their deterrence value. The GAO report, Immigration Benefits: Additional Controls and a Sanctions Strategy Could Enhance DHS’s Ability to Control Benefit Fraud, is available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06259.pdf.
Back to Top


11. Recent Articles & News from ABIL Members

ABIL co-sponsors seminar on Global Migration Issues. While members of the Academy of Business Immigration Lawyers are in London to attend their semi-annual meeting, they will co-sponsor a seminar, “Managing Global Mobility,” with British American Business Inc. (BABi). The seminar will be held on April 20, 2006, at the Marriott Hotel, Grosvenor Square, London, from 2:00 to 5:30 p.m. Panels will address Effective Global Migration Management – An Essential Element for Competitive Success; Compensation, Benefits and Tax Planning for International Assignments; and Global Immigration Systems – Similarities and Differences. ABIL moderators and faculty will include Angelo A. Paparelli, Steven Trow, H. Ronald Klasko, Laura Danielson, and Bryan Funai. The program chair is Kehrela Hodkinson. For additional information and to register, call +44 20 7493-0381 or see http://www.babinc.org/events/loneventcalendar.html.

ABIL co-sponsors seminar on labor certification. The Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers will co-sponsor a seminar with the Association of the Bar of the City of New York on “Labor Certification Fundamentals and Best Practice Under the New PERM System to Benefit Your Client and Your Immigration Practice,” on Wednesday and Thursday, May 10-11, 2006, from 6 to 9 p.m. at the New York City Bar, 42 West 44th Street. The program chair is Cyrus D. Mehta; moderators include H. Ronald Klasko and Stephen Yale-Loehr. Among the faculty are ABIL members Charles H. Kuck, Edward R. Litwin, and Angelo A. Paparelli. For more information or to register, call (212) 382-6663 or see https://www.nycbar.org/CLE/show_course.php?cnameid=1213.

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2006-04-01 00:00:222019-09-19 01:19:49News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 2, No. 4 • April 01, 2006
Page 29 of 29«‹272829

Archive

  • July 2020
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006

ABIL is a corporation with over 40 top-rated immigration law firms and 1,500+ professionals.

News

  • BRAZIL: Accepting Work Authorization Applications Thorugh New Digital Certificate System
  • News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 15, No. 9D • September 22, 2019
  • News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 15, No. 9C • September 15, 2019
  • News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 15, No. 9B • September 08, 2019

Sign Up for our Newsletters

Sign up for our Immigration Insider & Global Updates Newsletters

Select list(s) to subscribe to


By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers, 11 Dupont Circle, N.W., Washington, DC, 20036, https://www.abil.com. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact
© Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers (ABIL) All Rights Reserved 2023
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Home
  • About
  • ABIL Lawyers
  • Global Immigration
  • Services
  • Industries
  • Resources
  • Contact
Scroll to top