• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
ABIL
  • Home
  • About
  • ABIL Lawyers
    • North America
      • Canada
      • Costa Rica
      • Mexico
      • United States
    • South America
      • Colombia
    • Europe
      • Austria
      • Belgium
      • France
      • Germany
      • Italy
      • Netherlands
      • Poland
      • Spain
      • Switzerland
      • Turkey
      • United Kingdom
    • Asia Pacific & Africa
      • Australia
      • Hong Kong
  • Global Immigration
    • North America
      • Canada
      • Costa Rica
      • Mexico
      • United States
    • South America
      • Colombia
    • Europe
      • Austria
      • Belgium
      • France
      • Germany
      • Italy
      • Netherlands
      • Poland
      • Spain
      • Switzerland
      • Turkey
      • United Kingdom
    • Asia Pacific & Africa
      • Australia
      • China
      • India
      • Japan
  • Services
    • Complex Cases
    • Compliance
    • Corporate Immigration
    • Foreign Investment
    • Global Immigration
    • Government Policy
    • Litigation
    • Pro Bono
  • Industries
  • Resources
    • Blogs
    • News
    • Newsletters
    • Videos & Recordings
    • Articles
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 3, No. 4 • April 01, 2007

April 01, 2007/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. H-1B Rush Begins and Ends; Reform Bill Introduced in House; Other Developments – The H-1B cap could be filled immediately; bipartisan reform legislation is introduced in the House.

2. USCIS Reminds Applicants of New Filing Procedures Effective April 2 – Effective April 2, 2007, all Forms I-129 and I-539 are to be filed directly with the California Service Center or the Vermont Service Center, whichever is applicable.

3. H-2B Cap Reached – USCIS has received a sufficient number of petitions to reach the H-2B cap for the final six months of fiscal year 2007.

4. USCIS Announces Extension Stickers for Certain Honduran, Nicaraguan, Salvadoran TPS Re-Registrants – Certain Hondurans, Nicaraguans, and Salvadorans will have the opportunity to have an extension sticker affixed to their EAD while USCIS completes their TPS application.

5. New Guidance Issued on National Interest Waivers and Adjustment Applications for Physicians in Underserved Areas – Among other things, physicians with an approved NIW petition will no longer be restricted to a specific time period in which to fulfill the medical service requirement.

6. FOIA ‘E-Delinquents’ Include DOL, ICE – A new report finds that, 10 years after passage of the Electronic FOIA Amendments, several federal agencies fall short of the law.

7. New GAO Report Outlines US-VISIT Challenges – DHS continues to face longstanding US-VISIT management challenges and future uncertainties.

8. Immigrants Driving Globalization, Report Finds – A new report on the future of small business finds that immigrant entrepreneurs will drive a new wave of globalization.

9. Resources on the Web – Web sites provide information on the latest legislative and prosecutorial developments.

10. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members.


Details:

1. H-1B Rush Begins and Ends; Reform Bill Introduced in House; Other Developments

April 2, 2007, marked the start and end of the annual H-1B rush. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on April 3 that it had received many more than enough H-1B petitions to fill the annual quota on the very first filing day of the year. A random selection process will be employed to determine which cases will actually be accepted. The USCIS memo is at http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=22017.

Also, a USCIS interoffice field memorandum noted that the Department of Labor (DOL) Web site through which labor condition applications (LCAs) are requested has occasionally been unable to print a copy of the certified LCA after completion of the certifying process. The USCIS guidance instructs officers to accept H-1B petitions filed without a copy of the certified LCA for the FY 2008 cap if the filings are accompanied by screen prints from the DOL Web site showing that the LCAs were in fact certified on March 30, 2007 (or any other date on which USCIS can verify with DOL that the DOL LCA Web site malfunctioned). The screen print must display the ETA case number, the petitioner EIN, and the employer name. Before final adjudication of the petitions, USCIS may require copies of the certified LCAs. The memorandum is posted at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/FY08H1B_NoLCA033007.pdf.

Also, a USCIS interoffice field memorandum noted that the Department of Labor (DOL) Web site through which labor condition applications (LCAs) are requested has occasionally been unable to print a copy of the certified LCA after completion of the certifying process. The USCIS guidance instructs officers to accept H-1B petitions filed without a copy of the certified LCA for the FY 2008 cap if the filings are accompanied by screen prints from the DOL Web site showing that the LCAs were in fact certified on March 30, 2007 (or any other date on which USCIS can verify with DOL that the DOL LCA Web site malfunctioned). The screen print must display the ETA case number, the petitioner EIN, and the employer name. Before final adjudication of the petitions, USCIS may require copies of the certified LCAs. The memorandum is posted at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/FY08H1B_NoLCA033007.pdf.

The new legislation also would establish an H-2C temporary visa, valid for three years and renewable for another three. Under the H-2C visa, employers would be required to attempt to hire U.S. workers first and would be barred from hiring new immigrant workers in areas with high unemployment rates for workers with no education beyond high school. The H-2C visa program would have an initial cap of 400,000, adjusted yearly based on market fluctuations, and would include labor rights and protections, such as visa portability and competitive wage protections.

The new bill also would create a new guestworker program under a conditional nonimmigrant visa for eligible undocumented workers and their spouses and children in the U.S., valid for six years. Such workers, if they qualify, would have the opportunity to apply for permanent residence and eventual “earned citizenship,” but would have to wait at the back of the line for green cards and would have to pay a hefty fine. Among other things, to gain earned citizenship, a worker in most cases would need to meet a “legal reentry” requirement, whereby the worker would “reboot” his or her status by leaving the U.S. and returning.

Also, the new legislation calls for an electronic work authorization verification system for employers. The bill also incorporates the DREAM Act of 2007 and the AgJOBS Act of 2007.

Passage of the House bill remains uncertain. Some Republicans condemned the bill as an amnesty program for illegals. Discussions between Republican lawmakers in the Senate and the White House could lead in a different direction. Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) is reportedly heading a group of Republicans who are drafting a competing set of proposals in consultation with the White House. The Bush administration released a new immigration reform plan on March 29, 2007, that would also include a temporary guestworker program, with a “Z” visa renewable every three years after payment of a large fine each time. Under the administration’s plan, undocumented workers would need to register for temporary status within six months of the bill’s passage for the worker to receive consideration for legal status.

A Senate vote on immigration reform may take place in June. Senate majority leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) reportedly stated that the Senate immigration debate may be slated for the last two weeks of May. Hearings are expected in the House shortly. If legislation does not pass by the end of 2007, many expect that it will be difficult to move it forward in the 2008 presidential election year.

Compete America, a coalition of corporations, educators, research institutions, and trade associations, endorsed key provisions of the House bill, including updating the employment-based green card cap and exempting key categories of professional; creating exemptions from employment-based immigrant visa and H-1B caps for foreign students receiving an advanced degree from a U.S. university, as well as for foreign professionals who have earned advanced STEM degrees at foreign universities; updating the cap on H-1B visas for highly educated temporary workers; and creating a new student visa category to allow U.S. STEM degree holders who have a job offer to transition directly from student visa to green card. Compete America’s statement is available at http://www.competeamerica.org/news/alliance_pr/20070322_strive.html.

On March 7, 2007, at a hearing before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, Microsoft Corporation Chairman Bill Gates recommended an increase in the H-1B cap and streamlining the green card process for highly skilled workers. He lamented the current state of the U.S.’s “obsolete immigration system,” recommended changes in STEM education in the U.S., and expressed concerns about the dissuasion of foreign students from studying in the U.S. by the immigration system and new security measures. “Unfortunately, America’s immigration policies are driving away the world’s best and brightest precisely when we need them most,” he said. Mr. Gates predicted that if current trends continue, a significant percentage of all scientists and engineers in the world will be working outside of the U.S. by 2010.

Mr. Gates noted that the number of H-1B visas available “runs out faster and faster each year.” The current cap of 65,000 “is arbitrarily set and bears no relation to U.S. industry’s demand for skilled professionals,” he said, noting that for fiscal year 2007, the H-1B supply “did not last even eight weeks into the filing period, and ran out more than four months before that fiscal year even began.” For fiscal year 2008, Mr. Gates noted, H-1Bs are expected to run out in April, the first month that it is possible to apply for them. “This means that no new H-1B visas — often the only visa category available to recruit critically needed professional workers — will be available for a nearly 18-month period,” he warned.

Moreover, this year, for “the first time in the history of the program, the supply will run out before the year’s graduating students get their degrees. This means that U.S. employers will not be able to get H-1B visas for an entire crop of U.S. graduates. We are essentially asking top talent to leave the U.S.” He noted similar trends with the employment-based green card categories. Among other things, Mr. Gates called for “expedit[ing] the path to permanent resident status for highly skilled workers.” He said, “If Social Security is the dreaded third rail of politics, immigration is its downed electrical wire: a problem everyone knows about, but no one’s sure how to fix, so they just walk away.” Mr. Gates’s testimony is available at http://help.senate.gov/Hearings/2007_03_07/Gates.pdf.

Meanwhile, a coalition of organizations has released a set of visa policy recommendations, posted online at http://www.nafsa.org/press_releases.sec/press_releases.pg/coalitionvisarecs07_2. The policy proposals emphasize the important role that visa policy plays in both the security of the U.S. and its capacity to attract the best talent from other countries. The coalition includes the Alliance for International Educational and Cultural Exchange, the Coalition for Employment Through Exports, the Heritage Foundation, NAFSA: Association of International Educators, and the National Foreign Trade Council.

An overview of the STRIVE Act from Rep. Flake’s office is available at http://flake.house.gov/UploadedFiles/STRIVE%20Overview.pdf. The full text of the lengthy bill is available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.1645.IH:.

Testimony from Emilio Gutierrez, USCIS Director, at a hearing on March 27, 2007, on immigration reform and temporary workers before the House Subcommittee on Homeland Security is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/27mar07.pdf.

Back to Top


2. USCIS Reminds Applicants of New Filing Procedures Effective April 2

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has issued a reminder to applicants that, effective Monday, April 2, 2007, all Forms I-129 (Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker) and I-539 (Application to Change/Extend Nonimmigrant Status) are to be filed directly with the California Service Center or the Vermont Service Center, whichever is applicable. USCIS has released two separate filing charts for the forms to assist applicants in determining the direct filing location for their petition or application. Applicants are responsible for filing the forms with the correct Service Center and should verify that they are using the correct filing address by referring to the instructions on the relevant form.

USCIS said that the center where an applicant files a petition will generate the receipt notice and adjudicate the case. Compliance with the revised filing instructions “will ensure timely intake and case processing,” USCIS said.

USCIS’s reminder notice is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/I129andI539filing_033007.pdf, and the filing charts for the forms are available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=3df261151e821110VgnVCM1000000ecd190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=fe529c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD (Form I-129) and http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=2eede945cbc21110VgnVCM1000000ecd190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=fe529c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD (Form I-539).

Back to Top


3. H-2B Cap Reached

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on March 23, 2007, that it has received a sufficient number of petitions to reach the congressionally mandated H-2B cap for the final six months of fiscal year 2007. March 16, 2007, is the “final receipt date” for new H-2B worker petitions requesting employment start dates before October 1, 2007. The final receipt date is the date on which USCIS determines that it has received enough cap-subject petitions to reach the limit of 33,000 H-2B workers for the second half of FY 2007. USCIS will reject petitions for new H-2B workers seeking employment start dates before October 1, 2007, that arrived after March 16, 2007.

Petitions for both current and returning H-2B workers do not count toward the congressionally mandated biannual H-2B cap, USCIS noted. To qualify as a returning worker, the worker must have counted against the H-2B numerical cap between October 1, 2003, and September 30, 2006. USCIS said it would reject petitions received after the final receipt date that contain a combination of returning workers and workers subject to the H-2B cap. Petitioning employers will receive partial approvals for those who qualify as returning workers if otherwise approvable.

USCIS will continue to process petitions filed to:

  • Extend the stay of a current H-2B worker in the U.S.;
  • Change the terms of employment for current H-2B workers and extend their stay;
  • Allow current H-2B workers to change or add employers and extend their stay; or
  • Request eligible H-2B “returning workers.”

Back to Top


4. USCIS Announces Extension Stickers for Certain Honduran, Nicaraguan, Salvadoran TPS Re-Registrants

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on March 9, 2007, that certain Hondurans, Nicaraguans, and Salvadorans eligible for temporary protected status (TPS) re-registration, who have an application pending with USCIS and are awaiting an employment authorization document (EAD), will receive a letter giving them the opportunity to have an extension sticker affixed to their EAD while USCIS completes their TPS application.

USCIS said it will not issue a Federal Register notice automatically extending previously issued EADs further for this group. Applicants should not appear at USCIS district offices to seek an extension sticker or an interim EAD. Instead, USCIS will mail eligible TPS re-registrants a letter instructing them to proceed to a USCIS Application Support Center (ASC) to receive the short-duration extension sticker.

Those who receive the sticker while USCIS continues processing their applications will receive an extension valid through June 2007 for I-9 employment authorization verification purposes. USCIS began mailing letters giving eligible re-registrants the opportunity to appear at an ASC to receive the extension sticker beginning on March 5, 2007. One can verify an applicant’s continuing status and employment authorization by using the case receipt number to check USCIS Case Status Online athttps://egov.immigration.gov/cris/jsps/index.jsp, or by calling the USCIS National Customer Service Center at 1-800-375-5283.

USCIS said it recognizes that the automatic extension of existing EADs expired on Friday, January 5, 2007, for Honduras and Nicaragua and on March 9, 2007, for El Salvador. USCIS said it is working diligently to produce and mail the letters giving eligible re-registrants the opportunity to appear at an ASC to receive the extension sticker in the coming days “to minimize any lapse in documentation of employment authorization” for those TPS beneficiaries who have not received a renewal EAD.

Back to Top


5. New Guidance Issued on National Interest Waivers and Adjustment Applications for Physicians in Underserved Areas

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has established interim procedures for adjudicating national interest waiver (NIW) immigrant petitions and related adjustment of status applications filed on behalf of physicians practicing in medically underserved areas or at facilities operated by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), in light of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Schneider v. Chertoff. Among other things, physicians with an approved NIW petition will no longer be restricted to a specific time period in which to fulfill the medical service requirement.

USCIS said it is implementing the Schneider decision nationwide not only to ensure immediate compliance with the decision in cases within the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, but also to ensure consistent adjudication of all NIW physician cases nationwide. The interim guidance will be followed by amended regulations to give regulatory effect to the Schneider decision, USCIS said.

In addition, although not mandated by Schneider, USCIS is expanding the fields of medical specialty that may qualify physicians for NIWs by accepting petitions on behalf of physicians who provide “specialty care.” USCIS said it will adjudicate and approve NIW petitions for physicians who work in geographic areas that are designated by the Secretary of Health and Human Services as having a shortage of medical specialists for the Physicians Scarcity Area (PSA) program.

Also, the Conrad State 30 Program, established to address the shortage of qualified physicians in medically underserved areas, has been extended until June 1, 2008.

The Schneider guidance is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/SchneiderIntrm012307.pdf. The Conrad State 30 announcement is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/ConradExtnsn012907.pdf.

Back to Top


6. FOIA ‘E-Delinquents’ Include DOL, ICE

The National Security Archive at George Washington University has released a new report finding that, 10 years after passage of the Electronic Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Amendments, several federal agencies fall short of the law. The Department of Labor was cited for having no central reading room and no required documents available, and a lack of FOIA Web sites for several components. Immigration and Customs Enforcement had no dedicated FOIA page, very limited guidance, and no required documents.

The National Security Archive at George Washington University has released a new report finding that, 10 years after passage of the Electronic Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Amendments, several federal agencies fall short of the law. The Department of Labor was cited for having no central reading room and no required documents available, and a lack of FOIA Web sites for several components. Immigration and Customs Enforcement had no dedicated FOIA page, very limited guidance, and no required documents.

Back to Top


7. New GAO Report Outlines US-VISIT Challenges

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) has issued a report analyzing challenges that continue to face the US-VISIT program. The GAO noted that US-VISIT has improved the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS’s) ability to process visitors and verify identities upon entry, but found that management controls in place to identify and evaluate computer and other operational problems at land ports of entry were insufficient and inconsistently administered. In addition, the GAO noted, a biometric exit capability is not yet available. The GAO said that DHS continues to face longstanding US-VISIT management challenges and future uncertainties.

The GAO recommended that critical acquisition management processes be established and followed to ensure that program capabilities and expected mission outcomes are delivered on time and within budget. Such processes include, the GAO said, effective project planning, requirements management, contract tracking and oversight, test management, and financial management. Until these issues are addressed, the risk of US-VISIT continuing to fall short of expectations is increased, the GAO concluded. The report, “Homeland Security: US-VISIT Faces Operational, Technological, and Management Challenges” (GAO-07-632T), is available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d07632t.pdf.

Back to Top


8. Immigrants Driving Globalization, Report Finds

A new report on the future of small business, authored by the Institute for the Future, finds that immigrant entrepreneurs will drive a new wave of globalization, and that U.S. immigration policy and the outcome of the current immigration debates will affect how this segment performs over the next decade.

The “Intuit Future of Small Business Report” is available at http://www.intuit.com/futureofsmallbusiness/ (see pages 8 and 9 for information on immigrant entrepreneurs).

Back to Top


9. Resources on the Web

Roll Call and GalleryWatch have launched Congress Now!, an online source of legislative news. The newsletter for CongressNow! will appear in mid-afternoon, five days per week, and will feature news, analysis, and information on committee markups. Breaking news will be posted to CongressNow.com throughout the day and sent via e-mail alerts. These features are available free to congressional staff and members of Congress, and by subscription otherwise, at http://www.congressnow.com/subscribe. See http://www.gallerywatch.com/CN_release_031907.pdf for more information.

GovTrack provides a hyperlinked version of the Congressional Record for the current session, at http://www.govtrack.us/congress/recordindex.xpd. Custom “monitors” of subject areas to track, such as bills in Congress, may be set up at http://www.govtrack.us/users/aboutmonitors.xpd.

The latest Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) data tool, covering the five-year period through the end of November 2006, notes that criminal immigration charges by federal prosecutors have declined substantially in the last year. TRAC documents trends for the overall number of prosecutions filed and convictions obtained under U.S. immigration law in federal districts around the country. U.S. District Court judges who handled the largest number of immigration cases also are highlighted. For this and many other immigration reports by TRAC, see http://trac.syr.edu/immigration/reports/.

Back to Top


10. Recent News from ABIL Members

In the March 2007 edition of California Lawyer, Mark A. Ivener (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers-ivener.htm), author of Handbook of Immigration Law, Volumes I and II, was quoted in “Fed Up With The Feds,” an article about frustrated local jurisdictions passing their own immigration-related measures. He said he is amazed that some of these ordinances see the light of day and that, in his view, “the whole area is preempted by federal law.” In the case of landlords, for example, Mr. Ivener said such local laws impermissibly force them to be “immigration officers enforcing federal harboring laws.” The article is available at http://californialawyermagazine.com/index.cfm?sid=&tkn=&eid=884307&evid=1. For more on Mr. Ivener’s practice, see http://www.usworkvisa.com/.

On a related topic, Stephen Yale-Loehr (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers-loehr.htm) testified on March 19, 2007, as an expert witness in the American Civil Liberties Union’s lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Hazleton, Pennsylvania’s “Illegal Immigration Relief Act.” In an article published by the Scranton, PA Times-Tribune, Mr. Yale-Loehr pointed out that someone in the U.S. without authorization may be entitled to legal status in a number of ways. He noted that “[o]nly an immigration judge in an immigration proceeding can determine your status once and for all.” The article is available at http://www.thetimes-tribune.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=18097976&BRD=2185&PAG=461&dept_id=415898&rfi=. For more information on Mr. Yale-Loehr’s practice, see http://www.millermayer.com/.

Mr. Yale-Loehr chaired a day-long basic immigration law seminar sponsored by the Practising Law Institute in New York City on March 23, 2007. Over 100 new immigration lawyers attended. Among the speakers was ABIL member Cyrus Mehta.

Angelo A. Paparelli (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers-paparelli.htm) , president of the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers and a critic of the Hazleton law, noted that a federal judge had struck down Proposition 187, the 1994 California ballot measure that sought to deny public services to undocumented people, because it conflicted with federal immigration law. His comment appeared in an Associated Press article, available at http://www.wtop.com/?nid=104&pid=0&sid=1038524&page=2. For more information on Mr. Paparelli’s practice, see http://www.entertheusa.com/.

Mr. Paparelli also was recently quoted in an article about immigrants and taxes. “A very large number of entrepreneurs are not, in my experience, the type who are going to cross the border in the dead of night,” he said. “Most people come here in a lawful status, and then in one way or another – by design or by unwitting behavior or by failure to act – fall out of status. That is not an easy situation for people.” He noted that “[t]hey may have hired U.S. workers, they may have signed a lease on a building. All of that gets thrown into a situation of jeopardy” if the owner falls out of status or undergoes immigration-related scrutiny. The article is available at http://www.smartmoney.com/tax/filing/index.cfm?story=ia.

Mr. Paparelli spoke on “Supercharging Your Immigration Practice” at an Immigration Lawyers on the Web seminar held on March 30, 2007, in New York City. Mr. Paparelli offered his ideas on how to identify new revenue streams, build a loyal network of referral sources, enhance practice efficiency and customer service, and maintain firm morale. He also spoke on a panel on “Resuscitating Out of Status Aliens,” which explored extraordinary remedies for out-of-status nonimmigrants and adjustment of status applicants.

On March 26, 2007, Cyrus D. Mehta (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers-mehta.htm) spoke at New York Law School on Hiroshi Motomura’s new book, “Americans in Waiting: The Lost Story of Immigration and Citizenship in the U.S.” The book reveals how immigrants historically have been considered presumptive citizens rather than visitors who had to earn rights over time. By conferring additional rights and benefits on permanent residents until they can become U.S. citizens, but withdrawing those rights and benefits if they choose not to pursue citizenship when the opportunity is available to them, the book suggests that a return to this historical practice could strengthen the U.S. immigration legal system and create a more unified society. More information on the book is available at http://www.us.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Law/ImmigrationLaw/?view=usa&ci=9780195163452. For more information on Mr. Mehta’s practice, see http://www.cyrusmehta.com/.

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2007-04-01 00:00:042019-09-19 00:39:56News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 3, No. 4 • April 01, 2007

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 3, No. 3 • March 01, 2007

March 01, 2007/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. USCIS Revises Work Authorization Application – USCIS has revised the Application for Employment Authorization to obtain supplemental evidence from foreign physicians with national interest waivers.

2. Court Holds That Adjustment Applicants Can Exercise Job Portability in Removal Proceedings – The Fourth Circuit ruled that applicants with pending adjustment of status applications can exercise job portability while in removal proceedings.

3. DHS Proposes to Relax Land, Sea Passport Rules for Children – The DHS plans to propose significant flexibility on requirements for travel documents for U.S. and Canadian children entering the U.S. via land or sea ports.

4. Top Officials of Cleaning Service Charged With Immigration Violations – About 200 undocumented workers in 18 states were swept up in a federal investigation of a cleaning service.

5. Employment Third Preference Category Stagnates – Little if any forward movement in the employment third preference category is expected in the near future.

6. DHS Launches Traveler Redress Inquiry Program – DHS TRIP provides a way for travelers to address situations where they have been incorrectly delayed, denied boarding, or identified for additional screening.

7. CBP Establishes Traveler Complaint Web Site – CBP has four primary programs to address customer complaints and feedback.

8. Business Travel to U.S. Down 10 Percent – A report blames the decline primarily on post-9/11 visa hassles.

9. BIA Says Individual Is Child Who Filed for Adjustment After CSPA Effective Date – The respondent retained his status as a child, and therefore was an immediate relative, because he was under the age of 21 when the visa petition was filed on his behalf.

10. USCIS To Reissue RFEs for Religious Workers – Affected petitioners do not have to respond to generic RFEs.

11. GAO Says US-VISIT Needs Work – The US-VISIT program has not yet implemented a biometric exit capability or a suitable alternative.

12. Congressional Research Service Analyzes Unauthorized Foreign Students and the DREAM Act – CRS analyzed legislative proposals that would enable some unauthorized foreign students to become lawful permanent residents (LPRs) through cancellation of removal.

13. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members.


Details:

1. USCIS Revises Work Authorization Application

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has revised the Application for Employment Authorization (Form I-765) to obtain supplemental evidence from foreign physicians with national interest waivers (NIWs). The revised form also reduces the number of reasons for filing.

USCIS said that the new form requires more evidence from NIW physician applicants to ensure that they are not using a pending adjustment of status application solely as a means for employment other than for medical service in designated shortage areas. Previous versions of the I-765 will no longer be accepted but I-765s that were received as of February 21, 2007, will be accepted and processed.

USCIS noted that the revision was necessitated by a recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (San Francisco), Schneider v. Chertoff, holding that certain NIW physician regulations intending to ensure compliance with the Nursing Relief Act and the Immigration and Nationality Act were ultra vires (beyond power or authority). USCIS said it believes that providing necessary and reliable medical care to medically underserved areas remains an important mission of the Nursing Relief Act and that it is imperative to secure this commitment from NIW physicians.

The revised I-765 removes two options as reasons for filing: (1) replacement of an employment authorization document (EAD) that was never received, and (2) replacement of an EAD that was issued with incorrect information because of a USCIS administrative error. Those who wish to file an I-765 for those reasons should contact the USCIS office that processed their previously filed I-765 (the USCIS letter accompanying the EAD contains the address of that office). Applicants may also call the National Service Center (800-375-5283) to ask about an EAD that was never received or was received with incorrect information.

The announcement is posted at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/I-765.pdf and the revised form is posted at http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/I-765.pdf.

Back to Top


2. Court Holds That Adjustment Applicants Can Exercise Job Portability in Removal Proceedings

On February 22, 2007, in Perez-Vargas v. Gonzales, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled that applicants with pending adjustment of status applications can exercise job portability while in removal proceedings.

Section 204(j) of the Immigration and Nationality Act allows those with adjustment of status applications pending for more than 180 days to continue with the permanent resident status process despite changing jobs or employers, provided the new job is in an occupational classification that is the same as, or similar to, the one sponsored by the original employer. In Perez-Vargas, the Fourth Circuit disagreed with the Board of Immigration Appeals’ conclusion that an immigration judge lacked jurisdiction to make such a portability determination under section 204(j). The court agreed with the petitioner that the BIA misapprehended the question by distinguishing jurisdiction to adjudicate an application for adjustment of status from jurisdiction to make a section 204(j) determination. Among other things, the court reasoned that the BIA’s interpretation would effectively negate the beneficial impact of section 204(j) with respect to noncitizens in removal proceedings, an interpretation that runs contrary to the plain language of the statute.

For more on this case, including an analysis of its likely effects in the Ninth Circuit and other jurisdictions, see Mehta, “Fourth Circuit Holds That Adjustment Applicants Can Exercise Job ‘Portability’ in Removal Proceedings,” available online at http://www.cyrusmehta.com/news.aspx?SubIdx=ocyrus200722323040.

Back to Top


3. DHS Proposes to Relax Land, Sea Passport Rules for Children

As part of the forthcoming notice of proposed rulemaking on the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative (WHTI), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) plans to propose significant flexibility on requirements for travel documents for U.S. and Canadian children entering the U.S. via land or sea ports. The proposal would allow U.S. and Canadian citizen children 15 and under, with parental consent, to cross the border at land and sea ports with a certified copy of their birth certificate as an alternative to a passport or other WHTI-compliant identity document. Also, U.S. and Canadian citizen children, ages 16 through 18, traveling with public or private school groups, religious groups, social or cultural organizations or teams associated with youth athletics organizations would be able to enter at land or sea ports under adult supervision with a certified copy of their birth certificate.

The initial phase of WHTI travel document requirements went into effect in January, requiring all air travelers regardless of age to present a passport for entry into the U.S. The DHS proposal does not affect the requirements for air travel.

The Department of State plans to issue final regulations soon that will allow the Department to issue U.S. citizens a lower-cost alternative to a passport, the Passport Card. The DHS said that a proposed rule addressing land and sea travel will be published at a later date and will include additional details on requirements for travelers entering the U.S. through land and sea border crossing. The DHS plans to continue to issue WHTI-compliant border crossing documents for frequent border crossers under its trusted traveler programs.

The DHS’s announcement is posted at http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1172167923684.shtm.

Back to Top


4. Top Officials of Cleaning Service Charged With Immigration Violations

On February 22, 2007, undocumented workers in 18 states were swept up in a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Internal Revenue Service investigation of Rosenbaum-Cunningham International, Inc. (RCI), a cleaning service. RCI co-owners were charged with various fraud, immigration, and tax charges in a 23-count indictment. The estimated 200 janitors were nabbed at 63 locations, including the House of Blues, Hard Rock Café, ESPN Zone, Planet Hollywood, and others.

Such immigration raids are “not a humane or pragmatic way of solving an economic problem, let alone a social problem,” said Angelo A. Paparelli of Paparelli & Partners LLP, adding that he believes in a comprehensive solution rather than a piecemeal approach.

ICE’s announcement is posted at http://www.ice.gov/pi/news/newsreleases/articles/070222grandrapids.htm.

Back to Top


5. Employment Third Preference Category Stagnates

The Department of State (DOS) notes in the Visa Bulletin for March 2007 that little if any forward movement in the employment third preference category is expected in the near future. Recent discussions with both U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and the Department of Labor indicate, the DOS said, that the demand for numbers with pre-August 2002 priority dates is likely to be extremely high in the coming months as both agencies continue to work on their backlogs. This could easily cause a retrogression of the current employment third preference cut-off dates if that demand begins to materialize at USCIS offices during the spring and summer months.
Back to Top


6. DHS Launches Traveler Redress Inquiry Program

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has launched the DHS Traveler Redress Inquiry Program (DHS TRIP), to enable travelers to seek redress and resolve watch list misidentification issues. DHS TRIP provides a way for travelers to address situations where they have been incorrectly delayed, denied boarding, identified for additional screening, or have otherwise experienced difficulties when seeking to enter the U.S. The program also “facilitates redress information sharing” among the DHS’s agencies and creates internal performance measures to monitor progress.

DHS said that DHS TRIP enables travelers to outline their concerns in a single request via a secure Web site. The information received will be shared with appropriate DHS component agencies, such as the Transportation Security Administration and the Department of State.

For more information on DHS TRIP or to use the system, see http://www.dhs.gov/xtrvlsec/programs/gc_1169676919316.shtm.

Back to Top


7. CBP Establishes Traveler Complaint Web Site

In the February 26, 2007, issue of Newsweek magazine, Fareed Zakaria noted that total international arrivals to the U.S. declined 10 percent between 2000 and 2004. and that business travel to the U.S. has declined by 10 percent in the last two years while other major capitals (London, Singapore, Dubai) are experiencing increases. Further, Mr. Zakaria said, although the U.S. increased foreign student enrollment by 17 percent between 1999 and 2005, during the same period, enrollments have grown by 28 percent in Britain, 42 percent in Australia, 46 percent in Germany, and 81 percent in France. The article blames the depression of the U.S. travel market relative to other nations primarily on post-9/11 visa hassles, noting that Discover America polled 2,000 randomly selected international travelers this winter and asked them which location is the worst for visa problems and difficulties with immigration officials; the U.S. topped the list.

The Saudi chapter of the Young Arab Leaders passed up a business forum held in New York last year, the Newsweek article reports, because they “refused to go through what has become an extremely demeaning process for visa applications,” a conference organizer said. Attendees at the conference, the pro-business Arab and American Action Forum, were pulled out of line at John F. Kennedy International Airport and made to stand for two to five hours, the article states, while security officials questioned them about whether they had used weapons and what they thought of the war in Iraq. “We seem to have lost the ability to think rationally about security,” said homeland security expert Stephen Flynn.

Back to Top


8. Business Travel to U.S. Down 10 Percent

In the February 26, 2007, issue of Newsweek magazine, Fareed Zakaria noted that total international arrivals to the U.S. declined 10 percent between 2000 and 2004. and that business travel to the U.S. has declined by 10 percent in the last two years while other major capitals (London, Singapore, Dubai) are experiencing increases. Further, Mr. Zakaria said, although the U.S. increased foreign student enrollment by 17 percent between 1999 and 2005, during the same period, enrollments have grown by 28 percent in Britain, 42 percent in Australia, 46 percent in Germany, and 81 percent in France. The article blames the depression of the U.S. travel market relative to other nations primarily on post-9/11 visa hassles, noting that Discover America polled 2,000 randomly selected international travelers this winter and asked them which location is the worst for visa problems and difficulties with immigration officials; the U.S. topped the list.

The Saudi chapter of the Young Arab Leaders passed up a business forum held in New York last year, the Newsweek article reports, because they “refused to go through what has become an extremely demeaning process for visa applications,” a conference organizer said. Attendees at the conference, the pro-business Arab and American Action Forum, were pulled out of line at John F. Kennedy International Airport and made to stand for two to five hours, the article states, while security officials questioned them about whether they had used weapons and what they thought of the war in Iraq. “We seem to have lost the ability to think rationally about security,” said homeland security expert Stephen Flynn.

Back to Top


9. BIA Says Individual Is Child Who Filed for Adjustment After CSPA Effective Date

The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) sustained the appeal and remanded the case of a person whose visa petition was approved before the August 6, 2002, effective date of the Child Status Protection Act (CSPA) but who filed an adjustment of status application after that date. The BIA said the respondent retained his status as a child, and therefore was an immediate relative, because he was under the age of 21 when the visa petition was filed on his behalf.

Among other things, the BIA found no indication that Congress intended to exclude from coverage of the CSPA those whose visa petitions were approved before its effective date but who waited until after that date to file an adjustment application. The BIA noted that the CSPA was created to remedy the problem of minor children of U.S. citizens losing their immediate relative status and being “demoted” to the family first preference category as a result of the backlog in adjudicating visa petitions and applications for adjustment of status.

The full text of the case is posted at http://www.usdoj.gov/eoir/vll/intdec/vol24/3551.pdf.

Back to Top


10. USCIS To Reissue RFEs for Religious Workers

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has found recently that some requests for evidence (RFEs) were issued to petitioners for special immigrant religious workers that did not take into account the supporting evidence that was included with the petitions. These generic RFEs requested evidence with respect to every eligibility criteria regardless of the evidence submitted initially by the petitioners. On January 29, 2007, USCIS discontinued the use of generic RFEs and, in an announcement on February 16, 2007, the agency said that affected petitioners do not have to respond to these generic RFEs. Affected petitioners may respond if they choose, however, by pointing out the evidence already submitted and submitting any other missing evidence. “Petitions will not be denied for abandonment for failure to respond to these generic RFEs,” USCIS said.

USCIS said that after reviewing each of these petitions, the agency will send a case-specific RFE, if needed, to affected petitioners to request specific additional supporting evidence required for adjudication. After USCIS receives the petitioner’s response to the case-specific RFE within the timeframe specified, it will make a decision on the case.

The announcement is posted at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/ReligiousWkrsRFE021607PN.pdf.

Back to Top


11. GAO Says US-VISIT Needs Work

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) said in a recent report that the Department of Homeland Security’s US-VISIT program has not yet implemented a biometric exit capability or a suitable alternative. Among other things, the GAO said that the DHS has continued to pursue US-VISIT without fleshing out the program’s operational and technological context. The DHS also has launched other major security programs without defining the relationship between US-VISIT and those programs. Without effective management controls, the GAO said, there is a risk that US-VISIT “will not produce the right solution, and be managed the right way.” The report makes numerous recommendations to address the DHS’s management challenges with respect to US-VISIT.

The GAO report is available at http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-07-499T.

Back to Top


12. Congressional Research Service Analyzes Unauthorized Foreign Students and the DREAM Act

The Congressional Research Service (CRS) issued a report on January 30, 2007, that analyzes legislative proposals under the DREAM Act that would enable some unauthorized foreign students to become lawful permanent residents (LPRs) through cancellation of removal. Two similar DREAM Act bills were introduced in the 109thCongress: S. 2075 and H.R. 5131. Those bills would have enabled eligible unauthorized students to adjust to LPR status through a two-stage process. The CRS notes that H.R. 5131 was not passed but S. 2075 was incorporated into the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 (S. 2611), which passed the Senate in May 2006. The CRS said that the 110th Congress may consider DREAM Act legislation either as a free-standing bill or as part of a larger immigration reform measure.

The report, “Unauthorized Alien Students: Issues and ‘Dream Act’ Legislation,” was issued January 30, 2007, and is available at http://www.opencrs.com/rpts/RL33863_20070130.pdf.

Back to Top


13. Recent News from ABIL Members

Steve Clark, of Flynn & Clark, Cambridge, Massachusetts, chaired a workshop on prevailing wages used in labor certification and H-1B cases with the Prevailing Wage Specialists from the Massachusetts Division of Career Services at the Boston Bar Association on February 8, 2007.

Flynn & Clark attorney Jane Devlin has been asked to be a judge in the semifinal round of the Jessup International Moot Court Regional Competition held at Suffolk University Law School, to be held March 2-4, 2007.

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2007-03-01 00:00:062019-09-19 00:43:12News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 3, No. 3 • March 01, 2007

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 3, No. 2 • February 01, 2007

February 01, 2007/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. ABIL Issues H-1B Application Alert – The FY 2008 cap is expected to be met quickly; ABIL advises clients to begin preparing well in advance of the April filing start date.

2. USCIS Proposes Large Fee Increases – Business immigration forms will cost a lot more to file under USCIS’s proposal.

3. ABIL Invites Companies to Sign Letter to Congress Urging Innovation Measures – ABIL invites leaders of American business and higher education to sign on to a letter calling on Congress to act quickly on an innovation agenda that will ensure U.S. competitiveness.

4. Change of Address Function Introduced on Web – USCIS has launched a new Web-based service allowing most noncitizens to submit change-of-address information online.

5. H-1C Nursing Relief Program Reauthorized – USCIS recently released guidance on the reauthorization for an additional three years of the Nursing Relief for Disadvantaged Areas Act of 1999.

6. Colorado Passes Law Requiring Employers to Verify Work Authorization – Employers who fail to maintain the required documentation will be subject to fines.

7. USCIS Clarifies P-1 Expansion – USCIS recently released a memorandum on P-1 admission for minor league professionals, entertainers, and teams under the COMPETE Act of 2006.

8. New Naturalization Test Pilot Emphasizes Civics, History – USCIS has released details about its pilot naturalization exam beginning in February.

9. USCIS Releases TPS Details for Honduras, Nicaragua, El Salvador – USCIS has approved a majority of temporary protected status applications received from Hondurans, Nicaraguans, and Salvadorans.

10. Foreign Entrepreneurs Start 25 Percent of New U.S. Technology Companies, Study Estimates – A new study estimates that one out of every four U.S. technology start-ups over the past 10 years has at least one senior executive who was born outside the U.S.

11. Small Businesses Agree That Undocumented Immigration is a Problem, But Are Divided on Solution; Lawsuits Filed – Ninety percent of small business owners surveyed agreed that undocumented immigration is a problem, but differed on solutions; some are choosing to sue rivals for immigration violations.

12. Wired Editor Wins US-VISIT FOIA Case – A California court has ordered U.S. Customs and Border Protection to release documents revealing that US-VISIT computers malfunctioned because of a common computer “worm.”

13. Google Tools Allow Custom Searches; ABIL Releases Tips on Navigating USCIS Web Site – Google has a variety of search tools and tips.

14. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members.


Details:

1. ABIL Issues H-1B Application Alert

The Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers (ABIL) advises graduating students and their employers to contact their ABIL member now to help them identify potential H-1B candidates and prepare H-1B paperwork. H-1B applications to be filed under the fiscal year 2008 cap will be accepted by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) no earlier than April 2, 2007, and the cap is expected to be met quickly.

It is possible that a gap will occur between H-1B workers’ employment authorization granted under Optional Practical Training (OPT) and their H-1B work start date. The 60-day grace period at the end of OPT allowing the student to remain in the U.S. does not include H-1B work that may not start before October 1, the beginning of the 2008 fiscal year. Employers are encouraged to contact their ABIL member for advice in specific situations, and to contact their representatives in Congress to address the problem and the shortage of skilled professionals.

For H-1B filings not subject to the annual cap, it is still possible to obtain H-1B status with an immediate start date for new employees who currently maintain H-1B status with another employer or have been in H-1B status in the past six years and subsequently have been absent from the U.S. for less than one year. In addition, institutions of higher education, nonprofits related or affiliated to such institutions, and nonprofit or governmental research organizations are exempt from the cap and may continue to obtain H-1B status for new employees.

USCIS also will continue to process H-1B petitions filed to: (1) extend the period of time a current H-1B worker may remain in the U.S.; (2) change the terms of employment for current H-1B workers; (3) allow current H-1B workers to change employers; or (4) allow current H-1B workers to work concurrently in a second H-1B position.

Back to Top


2. USCIS Proposes Large Fee Increases

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has proposed large filing fee increases for many immigration-related forms. In addition to raising fees, the rule proposes to merge the fees for certain applications so applicants will pay a single fee rather than paying several fees for related services. There is a 60-day comment period on the proposed rule, and the increases are not expected to take effect until at least six months after publication.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has proposed large filing fee increases for many immigration-related forms. In addition to raising fees, the rule proposes to merge the fees for certain applications so applicants will pay a single fee rather than paying several fees for related services. There is a 60-day comment period on the proposed rule, and the increases are not expected to take effect until at least six months after publication.

Some of the business-related forms that will be affected by the proposed increases, and their current and proposed fees, include:

  • I-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker: current, $190; proposed, $320.
  • I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker: current, $195; proposed, $475.
  • I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status: current, $325; proposed, $905 for applicants 14 years of age or older (except certain refugees).
  • I-765, Application for Employment Authorization: current, $180; proposed, $340.
  • N-400, Application for Naturalization: current, $330; proposed, $595.

Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.), John Conyers (D-Mich.), and Zoe Lofgren (D-Cal.) sent a letter on January 22, 2007, expressing their concern about the proposed fee increases to USCIS Director Emilio Gonzalez. They said they want to review the “extraordinary circumstances that could justify such a massive increase.” Their letter is posted at http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=21505.

Comments on the proposed rule (Docket No. USCIS-2006-0044), which was published in the Federal Register on February 1, 2007, should be sent to USCIS by April 2, 2007. Supporting documentation and any comments received will be posted on http://www.regulations.gov. An advance copy of the regulation circulated on January 31, 2007, is posted at http://bibdaily.com/pdfs/FeeRule.pdf. Related announcements and fact sheets are posted at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/PRBuilding1.pdf, http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/FSbuilding.pdf, http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/QABuilding1.pdf, and http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/FSmethod.pdf.

Back to Top


3. ABIL Invites Companies to Sign Letter to Congress Urging Innovation Measures

The Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers (ABIL) invites leaders of U.S. businesses and higher education institutions to sign on to a letter calling on Congress to act quickly on an innovation agenda that will ensure U.S. competitiveness. The letter recommends that Congress act to double the basic research budgets at the National Science Foundation, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the Department of Energy’s Office of Science, and the Department of Defense; increase funding of proven programs and incentives for science and math teacher recruitment and professional development; reform U.S. visa policies to welcome highly educated foreign professionals, particularly those holding advanced science, technology, engineering, or mathematics degrees, especially from U.S. universities; and make permanent a strengthened research and development tax credit.

The sign-on letter is available on the American Electronics Association’s Web site at http://www.aeanet.org/GovernmentAffairs/gajl_proclamation0107.asp. A similar letter urging Congress to enact comprehensive immigration reform is available at http://capwiz.com/aila2/issues/alert/?alertid=9221981.

Back to Top


4. Change of Address Function Introduced on Web

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on January 12, 2007, that it has launched a new Web-based service allowing most noncitizens to submit change-of-address information online. USCIS noted that all noncitizens in the U.S. are legally required to keep USCIS informed of any change of address within 10 days of a move by completing an Alien Change of Address Card (Form AR-11). USCIS processes more than one million change-of-address requests each year.

The new change-of-address Web tool is at http://www.uscis.gov/AR-11. Before using the online system, users should have available their USCIS receipt number (if their case is pending before USCIS), their new and old addresses, the names and biographical information of family members for whom the applicant has filed a petition, and the date and location (port of entry) of the applicant’s last entry into the U.S.

In May, USCIS plans to include allowing applicants with pending naturalization applications to report their change of address online. Until then, those individuals should continue to call USCIS at 1-800-375-5283 to report their changes of address.

The notice is posted at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/OnlineCoA.pdf.

Back to Top


5. H-1C Nursing Relief Program Reauthorized

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently released guidance to the field on the reauthorization for an additional three years of the Nursing Relief for Disadvantaged Areas Act of 1999 (NRDAA). Specifically, USCIS noted that all I-129 petitions for H-1C classification will be adjudicated exclusively at the Vermont Service Center, in accordance with previous practice.

The NRDAA established the H-1C program to reduce the shortage of qualified nurses in health professional shortage areas by allowing qualified hospitals to employ temporary foreign workers as registered nurses for up to three years. NRDAA expired on June 13, 2005; the reauthorization, enacted on December 20, 2006, took effect immediately and expires on December 20, 2009. Regulations will follow, USCIS said.

The notice is posted at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/H1CReauth122606.pdf.

Back to Top


6. Colorado Passes Law Requiring Employers to Verify Work Authorization

The Colorado General Assembly recently passed a law requiring Colorado employers, effective January 1, 2007, to verify the employment authorization status of new employees within 20 days. Employers who fail to maintain the required documentation will be subject to fines. An “Affirmation of Legal Work Status” is required to be attached with supporting documents to the federally mandated I-9 work authorization verification form.

The full text of the legislation is posted at http://www.leg.state.co.us/Clics2006B/csl.nsf/fsbillcont3/C25514D38E296.

Back to Top


7. USCIS Clarifies P-1 Expansion

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently released a memorandum to the field on P-1 admission for minor league professionals, entertainers, and teams under the COMPETE Act of 2006, which expanded the P-1 nonimmigrant visa classification to include certain athletes who were admitted formerly as H-2B nonimmigrants.

The following types of athletes and performers who seek admission for the purpose of performing in a competition or theatrical ice skating production fall under the P-1 nonimmigrant visa classification:

  • An individual who performs as an athlete, individually or as part of a group, at an internationally recognized level of performance.
  • A professional athlete employed by: (1) a team that is a member of an association of six or more professional sports teams whose total combined revenues exceed $10 million per year, if the association governs the conduct of its members and regulates the contests and exhibitions in which its member teams regularly engage, or (2) any minor league team that is affiliated with such an association.
  • Individual coaches or athletes performing with teams or franchises located in the U.S. that are part of an international league or association of 15 or more amateur sports teams if: (1) the foreign league is operating at the highest level of amateur performance in the relevant foreign country; (2) participation in that foreign league renders the players ineligible, whether on a temporary or permanent basis, to earn a scholarship or participate in the sport at a college or university in the U.S. under the rules of the National Collegiate Athletic Association; and (3) where a significant number of players who play in the foreign leagues are drafted by major league or minor league affiliates of such sports leagues in the U.S.
  • Amateur or professional ice skaters who perform, individually or as part of a group, in theatrical ice skating productions or tours.

Amateur or professional ice skaters who perform, individually or as part of a group, in theatrical ice skating productions or tours.

Back to Top


8. New Naturalization Test Pilot Emphasizes Civics, History

On January 22, 2007, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released details about its pilot naturalization exam. The new exam is intended, USCIS said, to “encourage civic learning and patriotism among prospective citizens.” USCIS noted that studies have shown nationwide inconsistencies in the way the test was administered and there was no assessment of whether applicants had a meaningful understanding of U.S. history and government. The new test will emphasize the fundamental concepts of American democracy and the rights and responsibilities of citizenship.

The reading and writing portions of the pilot naturalization exam are similar to those in the current test, except the new exam contains more civics-based vocabulary. Applicants will still have up to three chances to read and write a sentence correctly in English. In the writing section of the test, the testing officer will dictate a sentence and ask the applicant to write everything the officer reads. During the reading portion of the test, the testing officer will ask the applicant to read each word out loud in that sentence. The proposed format for the new civics exam will still require applicants to answer correctly six out of 10 questions chosen from a master list of 100 civics questions and answers. The difference is that the new questions will focus on civics and history topics rather than on the general range of topics on the current test.

The pilot testing program will begin in 10 cities beginning in February 2007 and will last two to three months. The 10 cities are Albany, NY; Boston, MA; Charleston, SC; Denver, CO; El Paso, TX; Kansas City, MO; Miami, FL; San Antonio, TX; Tucson, AZ; and Yakima, WA. USCIS will administer about 6,000 tests under the pilot, and will use 142 U.S. history and government questions and approximately 36 reading and 36 writing items. Topic areas include principles of American democracy, system of government, rule of law, rights and responsibilities, American history, and geography. Citizenship applicants in the 10 pilot areas who are scheduled for their naturalization tests during the pilot will receive advance copies of the civics questions and the reading and writing vocabulary lists for self-study. Applicants may decline participation in the pilot.

USCIS has posted the two vocabulary lists and other study materials at http://www.uscis.gov/natzpilot. The announcement, which includes a fact sheet, is posted at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/natztestfs.pdf.

Back to Top


9. USCIS Releases TPS Details for Honduras, Nicaragua, El Salvador

On January 26, 2007, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that it has received approximately 80,000 temporary protected status (TPS) applications from nationals of Honduras and Nicaragua, and approved nearly 70,000 of those cases. USCIS has received approximately 236,000 TPS applications from nationals of El Salvador and has approved nearly 196,000. Approved individuals should have already received, or will be receiving, an approval notice and notice of appointment to report to an Application Support Center for issuance of an extension sticker to extend their Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) through July 2007, or a new EAD “very shortly.” Those who have been denied have either already received their denial notices or will be receiving them shortly.

USCIS noted that re-registrants who have already had their biometrics appointment but are still awaiting a final decision on their application will either receive an interim card valid through July 2007, for Hondurans and Nicaraguans, or through September 2007, for Salvadorans, or have a hold on their case because of “some as yet unresolved issue.” Cases on hold should have received, or will be receiving, written notification from USCIS regarding any outstanding issues.

USCIS noted that applicants who fail to comply with the biometrics collection requirements risk denial of their TPS re-registration and the withdrawal of TPS.

The notices are posted at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/TPSMitch012607FS.pdf (Honduras and Nicaragua) and http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/TPSElSal_012607FS.pdf (El Salvador.

Back to Top


10. Foreign Entrepreneurs Start 25 Percent of New U.S. Technology Companies, Study Estimates

A new study by Duke University researchers has estimated that one out of every four U.S. technology start-ups over the past 10 years has at least one senior executive who was born outside the U.S. The study’s lead researcher, Vivek Wadhwa, who was born in India and founded two technology companies, noted, “It’s one thing if your gardener gets deported. But if these entrepreneurs leave, we’re really denting our intellectual property creation.” The most likely niches that immigrant entrepreneurs entered were semiconductors, communications, and software; least likely was defense. Mr. Wadhwa called the new study “the most comprehensive study to date on the contribution of skilled U.S. immigrants.”

he study is posted at http://memp.pratt.duke.edu/downloads/americas_new_immigrant_entrepreneurs.pdf. Mr. Wadhwa has authored a related article that recommends lifting the H-1B cap, among other things. The article, “Keeping Research and Leadership at Home,” is posted at http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/jan2007/sb20070118_135378.htm.

Back to Top


11. Small Businesses Agree That Undocumented Immigration is a Problem, But Are Divided on Solution; Lawsuits Filed

In a National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) survey, 90 percent of small business owners agreed that undocumented immigration is a problem. “Like most Americans, small-business owners are troubled by the problem of illegal immigration,” said Dan Danner, NFIB’s executive vice president of NFIB. “As Congress debates this issue, it is important that they take into account how any legislation will affect small-business owners and the economy. A thoughtful and deliberate process is the best path for lawmakers as they consider this contentious issue.”

The survey respondents have a mixed view on “amnesty” proposals, however. NFIB reported that 63 percent oppose amnesty for undocumented individuals if they only need to prove that they have been living in the U.S. for at least three years, but members are split on amnesty if the individuals are employed and not dependent on government services (45 percent in favor and 45 percent opposing). When asked who should be considered first priority for legal immigration, 43 percent said those who have job skills or qualifications that are in short supply, followed by 23 percent choosing those with family ties, and 20 percent preferring a “first-come, first-serve” system. Fifty-six percent of NFIB members support admitting foreign workers to fill skilled jobs where shortages exist, and 62 percent favor allowing people to enter the U.S., work for a specified period, and return home.

Increasing penalties for employers who knowingly hire undocumented workers was supported by 78 percent of the survey respondents. Small-business owners consider verification of identification documents used by an employee to prove eligibility to work a moderate burden that could be reduced by a single location verification/authorization system that would certify document authenticity, NFIB reported.

The survey announcement is posted at http://www.nfib.com/object/immigrationsurvey.html.

Meanwhile, some entrepreneurs and workers are not waiting for action in Congress. A variety of lawsuits have been filed to compel employers to meet their obligations under the law. For example, when Munger Bros., a California blueberry farm, decided to use a rival labor supplier instead of Global Horizons, Global filed a suit claiming that Munger Bros. hired the rival supplier (J&A Contracting) because it provides cheaper, illegal workers. Specifically, Global alleges that Munger Bros. and J&A “engaged in an illegal trust to restrict trade or commerce and conspired to restrain trade or commerce and lessen competition by Defendants’ use of illegal immigrant labor and violation of California wage and hour laws to those workers, the effect of which restrains and directly affects Plaintiff’s ability to compete in the marketplace.” The full text of the complaint is posted at http://www.fearnotlaw.com/gallery/download.php?id=34.

And in a suit against Zirkle Fruit in Washington, a $1.3 million settlement was recently reached. That suit, based on anti-racketeering laws, was filed by Zirkle’s employees, who claimed that their employer depressed wages by hiring undocumented workers. A similar suit has been filed by workers against Mohawk Industries in Georgia.

Back to Top


12. Wired Editor Wins US-VISIT FOIA Case

Last year, Wired News editor Kevin Poulsen sued U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) under the Freedom of Information Act, because CBP refused to disclose documents related to a US-VISIT computer failure. A federal court in California recently ordered the agency to release the documents, which revealed that the computers had been infected with a common worm. The court also granted Mr. Poulsen $66,000 in attorney’s fees.
Back to Top


13. Google Tools Allow Custom Searches; ABIL Releases Tips on Navigating USCIS Web Site

Google Custom Search Engine allows a user to create a customized search engine using Google technology and the user’s own customized index; see http://google.com/coop/cse/overview. At Google Scholar, the user can search using any language or a specified language: http://scholar.google.com/scholar_preferences. Google search tips can be found at http://www.googleguide.com/advanced_operators_reference.html, and a listing of special features and what they can be used for is posted at http://www.google.com/help/features.html.

On November 1, 2006, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that it had replaced its existing Web site with a “new and improved” site that promised to offer “easier access” to immigration information. Unfortunately, many users have disagreed. The new site has buried popular pages in nooks and crannies difficult to find for most searchers. If you’re having trouble navigating the revised USCIS Web site, these tips might help:

Google: The Google search engine is sometimes better at finding relevant pages than the USCIS Web site’s own search engine. You can use Google’s advanced search to “only return results from the site or domain” or search the keywords that you want, followed by “site: uscis.gov”.

Customer Guides: If you are looking for a specific page, another option is to start with a general category on the Customer Guides page, and navigate to the page you need from there.

Old USCIS Web site: Yet another method if you are looking for a specific page that you used before the change is to use the old Web site address at http://149.101.23.2. Beware, however, that this site has not been updated since October 30, 2006, so you should only use this site if you know that the information has not changed since then.

Back to Top


14. Recent News from ABIL Members

Steve Clark of Cambridge, Massachusetts, chaired a workshop at the Boston Bar Association on Visa Options for Artists, Entertainers and Athletes on January 11, 2007.

Angelo A. Paparelli recently co-authored an article for NAFSA: Association of International Educators on preparing for contact by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, including how to determine what student information can be released. Among other things, the article recommends having a consistent protocol for dealing with government inquiries, and educating students on maintaining immigration status and complying with campus policies. The article also advises keeping a written record of any phone calls from ICE agents, asking the agent to fax a written inquiry on ICE letterhead, and making sure to follow through on any ICE inquiry in order not to jeopardize the school’s ability to enroll international students. The full text of the article, “How Can I Prepare for a Contact from Immigration and Customs Enforcement,” is posted at http://www.nafsa.org/_/Document/_/how_to_prepare_for_a_2.pdf.

Mr. Paparelli also was quoted recently by the American Management Association in an article on building an immigration-friendly company that appeared in the January 2007 issue of Leader’s Edge. Mr. Paparelli, noting that luring top talent through an effective immigration strategy has become increasingly important, along with other forms of support offered to foreign workers adjusting to their new country. “More and more companies are trying to put themselves in the shoes of the individual,” Mr. Paparelli noted. Instead of a piecemeal, case-by-case approach, Mr. Paparelli recommends what he calls “global migration management,” a holistic strategy that streamlines the immigration process through establishing a set of standards, and “brands” the company as immigration-friendly, thus giving the company an edge in recruiting top foreign talent. “Building an Immigration-Friendly Company,” which includes more tips on attracting quality foreign workers, is posted at http://www.amanet.org/LeadersEdge/editorial.cfm?Ed=268&BNKNAVID=16&display=1.

Mr. Paparelli will present a seminar for immigration attorneys in New York City on March 30, sponsored by Immigration Lawyers on the Web (ilw.com). Topics will include, among other things, the immigration consequences of a merger or acquisition, EB-5 programs for immigrant investors, substantive case studies, and solutions to real-world issues. For more information, see http://www.ilw.com/workshops/march2007challenges.shtm.

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2007-02-01 00:00:272019-09-19 00:46:34News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 3, No. 2 • February 01, 2007

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 3, No. 1 • January 01, 2007

January 01, 2007/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. USCIS Issues Guidance on Periods of Admission for H and L Workers – USCIS has released guidance on determining periods of admission for certain H and L workers.

2. SSA Explains How Foreign Workers Can Get Social Security Numbers -The Social Security Administration has listed the documentation a foreign worker must have to obtain a Social Security number for work purposes.

3. No Progress on Immigration Reform in 109th Congress; Report Released on Immigration Legislation and Issues – The 109th session of Congress ended in December with no progress on major immigration reform legislation.

4. Dallas Suburb Sued Over Anti-Illegal Immigration Law – Several groups sued a suburb of Dallas, Texas, over an ordinance requiring that apartment renters show proof of U.S. residence and penalizing landlords who rent to undocumented persons.

5. Chamber of Commerce Asks for Clarification of WHTI Language – U.S. Chamber of Commerce officials sent a letter urging clarification of Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative language.

6. H-2B Cap Reached for First Half of FY 2007 – USCIS has received a sufficient number of H-2B petitions to reach the cap for the first six months of fiscal year 2007.

7. State Dept. Changes Personal Appearance Requirements for Interviews – A consular officer must now interview persons in the same age ranges as persons covered by biometric collection requirements.

8. USCIS Announces Processing Changes for J-1 Foreign Residence Waivers Under 212(e) – USCIS outlined processing changes for new filings based on claims of exceptional hardship or persecution.

9. Over Six Million Apply for DV-2008 Green Card Lottery – Over 6.4 million entries for the 2008 Diversity Visa Lottery were received during the two-month electronic registration period.

10. USCIS Issues Notice Launching Pilot Test for New Naturalization Exam – USCIS plans to revise the naturalization testing process to ensure that the process is uniform.

11. California Fence Company to Pay Fines for Illegal Hiring; Gov’t Raids Meatpacking Plants in Six States – Golden State Fence Company has been fined $5 million for hiring undocumented workers, and two company officials may receive jail time.

12. GAO Says Data on J-1 Waivers is Needed to Better Address Physician Shortages – HHS does not have the information needed to account for waiver physicians in its efforts to address physician shortages.

13. GAO Says US-VISIT Exit Program Does Not Meet Statutory Requirements – Biometric US-VISIT exit monitoring cannot now be implemented without having a major impact on land POE facilities.

14. New OIG Report Assesses USCIS’s Progress – A new USCIS Inspector General report concludes that USCIS “remains entrenched in a cycle of continual planning, with limited progress toward achieving its long-term transformation goals.”

15. Gov’t Agencies Release Info on Upcoming Regs – DHS recently summarized upcoming employment-related immigrant and nonimmigrant regulations.

16. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members.


Details:

1. USCIS Issues Guidance on Periods of Admission for H and L Workers

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released guidance on determining periods of admission for those previously in H-4 or L-2 status, those applying for additional periods of admission beyond the H-1B six-year maximum, and those who have not exhausted the six-year maximum but who have been absent from the U.S. for over one year. Specifically, the memorandum:

  • clarifies that time spent as an H-4 or L-2 dependent does not count against the maximum allowable period of stay available to principals in H-1B or L-1 status;
  • clarifies that H-1B workers, who qualify under section 106(a) and (c) of the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act of 2000 need not be in H-1B status when requesting an additional period of stay beyond the six-year maximum; and
  • clarifies how to determine the maximum period of admission in H-1B status for a beneficiary who was in the U.S. in valid H-1B status for less than the six-year maximum period of admission, but who has since been outside the U.S. for more than one year.

USCIS noted that a worker seeking H-1B or L-1 status (or corresponding derivative status) in light of these clarifications still must meet all of the substantive requirements for those classifications and is subject to the normal maintenance-of-status requirements.

Additional details on these clarifications and why they were necessary are included in the memorandum, which is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/PeriodsofAdm120506.pdf.

Back to Top


2. SSA Explains How Foreign Workers Can Get Social Security Numbers

The Social Security Administration (SSA) lists the following documentation required of a foreign worker in order to obtain a Social Security number (SSN) for work purposes:

  • Department of Homeland Security (DHS)-stamped work-authorized status on an I-94 (e.g., L-1 is work-authorized inherent in status), or
  • I-551 Permanent Resident Card (“green card”), or
  • Machine-readable immigrant visa with temporary work authorization language embedded on the face of the visa (upon endorsement, this serves as a temporary I-551 evidencing permanent residence for one year), or
  • Employment Authorization Document (EAD): I-766 or I-688B

B-2 temporary visitors for pleasure (tourists) are not authorized by DHS to work in the U.S. so they cannot be assigned SSNs for work. The only other way for a B-2 to get an SSN, which a spokesperson for the SSA said is rare, is if he or she qualifies for a non-work SSN. The only valid non-work reasons are:

  • a federal statute or regulation requires that the individual provide his or her SSN to get a particular benefit or service to which he or she has otherwise established entitlement;
  • a state or local law requires the individual, who is legally in the U.S., to provide his or her SSN to get public assistance benefits to which entitlement has been established otherwise and for which all other requirements have been met.

For more information, see “Foreign Workers and Social Security Numbers,” http://www.socialsecurity.gov/pubs/10107.html, and “Social Security Numbers for Noncitizens,” http://www.socialsecurity.gov/pubs/10096.html.

Back to Top


3. No Progress on Immigration Reform in 109th Congress; Report Released on Immigration Legislation and Issues

The 109th session of Congress ended in December with no progress on major immigration reform legislation or on the Securing Knowledge, Innovation, and Leadership (SKIL) Act of 2006, which was intended to provide visa shortage relief for key foreign nationals working in the U.S. As noted by the Congressional Research Service (CRS) in a detailed report, security concerns figured prominently in congressional debates this past year, and immigration enforcement remains on Congress’s agenda. Additional action is possible early in 2007 when appropriations bills will be considered.

The CRS’s report discusses limited provisions that were enacted on temporary and permanent employment-based immigration and other issues. The report is available at http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/76318.pdf.

Meanwhile, sources said Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.), the new chairman of the Senate immigration subcommittee, plans to put forward a new version of an immigration bill early this year. The bill is expected to contain many of the components of the measure Sen. Kennedy co-sponsored last year, including a legalization provision for undocumented workers. Also, according to sources, a coalition including immigration advocates, the Service Employees International Union, and business lobbyists are working on another provision to require employers to electronically verify the work authorization of new hires. The coalition does not want to require employers or workers to pay for verifications, and wants a certification that the system is workable before it takes effect.

Back to Top


4. Dallas Suburb Sued Over Anti-Illegal Immigration Law

The American Civil Liberties Union of Texas and the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund have sued Farmer’s Branch, a suburb of Dallas, Texas, over an ordinance requiring that apartment renters show proof of U.S. residence and penalizing landlords who rent to undocumented persons. The groups argue that the law is impermissibly vague and that federal immigration law preempts state and local law. Some local landlords are also against the ordinance because they say they are not trained to detect immigration document forgeries.

The complaint is available at http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/pdf/texasimmigrationcomplaint.pdf.

Back to Top


5. Chamber of Commerce Asks for Clarification of WHTI Language

On December 20, 2006, several U.S. Chamber of Commerce officials sent a letter urging clarification of Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative (WHTI) language. Angelo Amador and Kelly Hunt, the Chamber’s director and manager, respectively, of immigration policy, noted that Congress made legislative changes in September 2006 to the WHTI. The changes, among other things, required that the land and sea deadlines be synchronized and that the Departments of State and Homeland Security meet certain requirements before the deadlines are implemented, which could be as early as January 1, 2008, and as late as June 1, 2009.

Mr. Amador and Ms. Hunt stated that there has been much confusion surrounding the deadlines and requirements. The Chamber and other stakeholders have been meeting with relevant agencies to ensure that the government’s and private sector’s messages are accurate and consistent. To that end, the Chamber officials reviewed the language and plan to recommend clarifying changes. They suggest that the private sector adopt the new language as well.

Below is the proposed language drafted by the Chamber and reviewed by other groups in the travel and tourism industry:

CHANGE FROM PRIOR TRAVEL REQUIREMENTSAll persons, including U.S. citizens, entering the United States from the Americas, Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean, and Bermuda will soon be required to have a passport or other accepted document that establishes the bearer’s identity and citizenship.

The change will be implemented in two phases:

  1. Beginning January 23, 2007, all air travelers, including U.S. citizens, entering the U.S. will need a passport.
  2. As early as January 1, 2008, and no later than June 1, 2009, all persons, including U.S. citizens, traveling between the U.S. and Canada, Mexico, Central and South America, the Caribbean, and Bermuda by land or sea (including ferries), may be required to present a valid passport or other documents as determined by the Department of Homeland Security. A new law requires that an economical passport alternative be designed and tested before implementation of this second phase. Ample advance notice will be provided to enable the public to obtain the economical passport alternative for land/sea entries when they become available.

Back to Top


6. H-2B Cap Reached for First Half of FY 2007

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that it has received a sufficient number of H-2B petitions to reach the cap for the first six months of fiscal year (FY) 2007. USCIS will reject new petitions for H-2B workers seeking employment start dates before April 1, 2007. The agency will continue to accept petitions for new H-2B workers seeking employment start dates on or after April 1, 2007, only if such petitions are supported by a valid temporary labor certification.

Petitions for workers currently in H-2B status and returning H-2B workers do not count toward the H-2B cap. To qualify as a returning worker, the worker must have counted against the H-2B numerical cap between October 1, 2003, and September 30, 2006. Petitions received after the “final receipt date” (November 28, 2006) that contain a combination of returning workers and workers subject to the cap will be rejected with respect to the non-returning workers.

USCIS will continue to process petitions filed to extend the stay of a current H-2B worker; change the terms of employment for a current H-2B worker; allow a current H-2B worker to change or add an employer; and request eligible H-2B returning workers.

The notice is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/H2BCapReleaseFY2007_5dec06.pdf.

Back to Top


7. State Dept. Changes Personal Appearance Requirements for Interviews

The Department of State issued a final rule amending guidance to consular officers for the waiver of personal appearances of applicants for nonimmigrant visas. The most significant change is that a consular officer must now interview persons in the same age ranges as persons covered by biometric collection requirements. In addition to the existing list of situations in which an interview may not be waived, the personal interview requirement may not be waived for nonimmigrant visa applicants from third countries and applicants who have been refused visas previously or found ineligible for visas, where that ineligibility was not overcome.

The final rule is available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/E6-21492.pdf.

Back to Top


8. USCIS Announces Processing Changes for J-1 Foreign Residence Waivers Under 212(e)

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a public notice on December 19, 2006, outlining processing changes for new filings, based on claims of exceptional hardship or persecution, of the Application of Waiver of the Foreign Residence Requirement of section 212(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. Among other things, USCIS’s Nebraska, Texas, and Vermont Service Centers have begun forwarding to the California Service Center any such new filings. USCIS noted that it is not necessary for those who filed an I-612 previously to file a new application. New applicants seeking such a waiver should file their I-612s with the Service Center having jurisdiction over the applicant’s place of residence.

USCIS also noted that all 212(e) waiver recommendations received by the agency from the Department of State (DOS) based on a “no objection” statement from the individual’s home country, a request by an interested U.S. government agency, or a request by a state health department (State Conrad 30) are being forwarded to the Vermont Service Center (VSC) for processing. Waiver recommendations based on these three eligibility categories are transmitted electronically from the DOS to the VSC and are included in USCIS’s electronic case management system as an I-612. Following the review of DOS’s recommendation and completion of requisite security checks, the Service Center will issue a decision on the waiver request.

The notice is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/I612_121906PN.pdf.

Back to Top


9. Over Six Million Apply for DV-2008 Green Card Lottery

Over 6.4 million entries for the 2008 Diversity Visa (DV) green card lottery were received during the two-month electronic registration period, from October 4, 2006, through December 3, 2006. This was an increase from the more than 5.5 million applications received in the 2007 DV lottery.

Most of the applications were from Africa and Asia, with 41 percent of the total from Africa, 38 percent from Asia, 19 percent from Europe, and two percent from South America, Central America, and the Caribbean. The largest number of applicants were from Bangladesh (more than 1.7 million), followed by Nigeria (684,735) and Ukraine (619,584). The number of winning entries by country will be released after the random lottery process is conducted in 2007.

Winners will be notified by letter from the Kentucky Consular Center between April and July 2007. The letter will provide further instructions.

The Department of State noted that there have been attempts to defraud DV Lottery entrants. Those selected as winners in the random drawing are notified only by the Department of State’s Kentucky Consular Center. No other organization or company is authorized by the Department to contact winning entrants. The DV 2009 lottery registration period has not yet been opened and no applications are being accepted electronically now.

The Department’s notice is available at http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2006/77895.htm.

Back to Top


10. USCIS Issues Notice Launching Pilot Test for New Naturalization Exam

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has published a notice in the Federal Register confirming its announcement last month that it will be conducting a pilot of a redesigned naturalization test. USCIS plans to revise the naturalization testing process to ensure that the process is uniform; currently, test content varies among USCIS district offices. Based on the evaluation of the pilot, the final test is expected to be implemented nationally beginning in 2008.

USCIS said it plans to retain the current U.S. history and government test format but will replace the “trivia-based content” of the questions with new questions that will test applicants on the fundamentals of American democracy, such as the rule of law, separation of powers, and rights.

The notice, published on December 19, 2006, lists the sites where the pilot test will be conducted beginning in early 2007. The notice is available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/E6-21548.pdf.

Back to Top


11. California Fence Company to Pay Fines for Illegal Hiring; Gov’t Raids Meatpacking Plants in Six States

Golden State Fence Company has been fined $5 million for hiring undocumented workers, and two company officials may receive jail time. The company had received a warning in 1999 but follow-up checks in 2004 and 2005 revealed that up to a third of the company’s workers remained unauthorized. One of the company’s projects included construction of a portion of a 14-mile border fence in San Diego, California, in the late 1990s.

In another enforcement action, federal agents raided meatpacking plants in six states. Raids against the Colorado-based Swift & Company’s plants were the largest-ever immigration enforcement action, Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff said. Some observers were skeptical about the impact of the action. Frank Sharry, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, noted that “[w]e’ve been doing raids for 20 years, and the immigration problem is soaring. You can’t restore the rule of law until you respond to the law of supply and demand.”

Meanwhile, under a new state law, Colorado employers will have 20 days to verify the work authorization status of a new employee. Employers who fail to maintain the required documentation will be subject to fines of up to $5,000 for the first offense and $25,000 for subsequent offenses.

Back to Top


12. GAO Says Data on J-1 Waivers is Needed to Better Address Physician Shortages

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) has released a report discussing the use of J-1 visa waivers as a major means of providing physicians to practice in underserved areas of the U.S. As the report notes, over 1,000 waivers were requested in each of fiscal years 2003 through 2005 by states and three federal agencies. In contrast to a decade ago, when federal agencies requested the vast majority of waivers, states have become the primary source of J-1 visa waiver requests.

States and federal agencies have requested waivers for physicians to work in a variety of practice specialties, settings, and locations. More than three-quarters of the waiver requests were for physicians to work in hospitals or private practices, and about half were for physicians to practice in rural areas.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) does not have the information needed to account for waiver physicians in its efforts to address physician shortages, the GAO noted, recommending that HHS collect and maintain data on waiver physicians and use these data when identifying areas experiencing physician shortages and placing physicians in these areas.

The report, “Foreign Physicians: Data on J-1 Waivers Needed to Better Address Physician Shortages,” is available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d0752.pdf.

Back to Top


13. GAO Says US-VISIT Exit Program Does Not Meet Statutory Requirements

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) concluded in a new report that biometric US-VISIT exit monitoring cannot now be implemented without having a major impact on land POE facilities. An interim nonbiometric exit technology being tested does not meet the statutory requirement and cannot ensure that visitors who enter the U.S. are the same as those who leave.

The GAO noted that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has not yet reported to Congress on a required plan describing how it intends to fully implement a biometric entry/exit program or to use nonbiometric solutions. Until this plan is finalized, the GAO said, neither DHS nor Congress is in a good position to prioritize and allocate program resources or plan for POE facility modifications. DHS also has not yet articulated how US-VISIT will align with other emerging land border security initiatives and mandates, and thus cannot ensure that the program will meet strategic program goals and operate cost-effectively at land POEs.

The GAO recommends that DHS improve existing management controls for US-VISIT, develop performance measures to assess the impact of US-VISIT at land POEs, and ensure that a statutorily mandated report describes how DHS will move to a biometric entry-exit capability and align US-VISIT with other emerging land border security initiatives.

The GAO report, “Border Security: US-VISIT Program Faces Strategic, Operational, and Technological Challenges at Land Ports of Entry,” is available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d07248.pdf.

Back to Top


14. New OIG Report Assesses USCIS’s Progress

A new U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Inspector General report concludes that USCIS “remains entrenched in a cycle of continual planning, with limited progress toward achieving its long-term transformation goals.” Overcoming hindrances to moving from planning to implementation “is critical to addressing longstanding USCIS process and systems issues and realizing a more effective benefits processing environment.”

Specifically, the report states, obtaining the funding needed to support implementation of USCIS’s business transformation program is a continual concern. Establishing a clearly defined strategy, including funding plans, goals, and performance measures, is fundamental, the Inspector General said. Linking information technology (IT) objectives to this transformation strategy and ensuring sufficient internal and external stakeholder involvement in IT and process improvement initiatives also will be key. Until USCIS addresses these issues, the Inspector General noted, the agency will not be in a position to either manage existing workloads effectively or handle the potentially dramatic increase in immigration benefits processing workloads that could result from proposed immigration reform legislation.

The report, “U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ Progress in Modernizing Information Technology,” is available at http://www.dhs.gov/xoig/assets/mgmtrpts/OIG_07-11_Nov06.pdf.

Back to Top


15. Gov’t Agencies Release Info on Upcoming Regs

Several agencies recently released their semiannual regulatory agendas, which summarize planned upcoming proposed, interim, and final rules intended for publication. If past history is any indication, timetables often change and rules are frequently postponed, but the agencies’ semiannual regulatory agendas provide a good overview of what changes can be anticipated in the foreseeable future regarding implementation of processes and requirements.

Selected immigrant and nonimmigrant employment-related highlights of the lengthy semiannual regulatory agenda of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) follow.

liminating substitution of beneficiaries on permanent labor certification applications. DHS will propose to eliminate the current practice of allowing the substitution of beneficiaries on permanent labor certifications, among other options. In addition, DHS is proposing to reduce further the likelihood of the submission of malafide Immigrant Petitions for Alien Worker (Forms I-140), which are employment-based petitions “supported by fraudulent or stale labor certification applications” for the permanent employment of aliens in the U.S., by proposing a 45-day period for employers to file approved permanent labor certifications in support of Form I-140 petitions with DHS after the issuance of an approved labor certification by the Department of Labor.

Requiring electronic filing. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), which is part of DHS, is restructuring its business processes to implement new procedures for filing, processing, and adjudicating all benefit applications and petitions. USCIS will move toward electronic filing and adjudication of benefits to streamline processing, modernize adjudications, and facilitate efficient and effective data collection and reporting.

Fee changes. In several upcoming rules, USCIS is proposing to raise fees or charge new fees. USCIS proposes to charge a new immigrant visa service fee to every immigrant visa applicant. Currently, USCIS does not charge immigrant visa applicants overseas the service fee that it charges to adjustment of status applicants in the U.S. By charging a new immigrant visa service fee, USCIS hopes to recover the full operating costs of providing maintenance services to all new permanent residents. USCIS expects to issue a notice of proposed rulemaking in January.

Another rule proposes increases in immigration benefit application and petition fees and the biometric fee for applicants/petitioners who apply for certain immigration benefits for fiscal years 2008 and FY 2009.

Changes in premium processing fees and timetables. Another DHS rule proposes to raise the premium processing fee for employment-based petitions and applications, and provides that all future fee adjustments for Premium Processing Service will be made annually through publication in the Federal Register. Meanwhile, an interim rule planned for mid-2007 changes the premium processing time from 15 calendar days to 15 business days and adds circumstances that will stop the premium processing clock. This rule also clarifies that for e-filed petitions and applications, the 15-business-day processing period begins when USCIS receives the initial required supporting documentation to adjudicate the case at the Service Center with jurisdiction over that case.

Allocating H-1B numbers. A final rule will implement certain changes made by the Omnibus Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2005 to the numerical limits on the H-1B nonimmigrant visa category and the fees for filing H-1B petitions. The rule also notifies the public of the procedures USCIS will use to allocate the additional H-1B numbers made available under that Act. This rule further modifies USCIS premium processing regulations by providing authority to delay, suspend, or set an alternate date on which the 15-calendar-day premium processing period starts.

Halting concurrent filing of I-140s and I-485s. USCIS is proposing to amend its regulations concerning employment-based immigrant status. Under the current regulations, employers may file a Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status (I-485) concurrently with Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker (immigrant petition), while the immigrant petition is pending; or after the immigrant petition has been approved, as long as a visa number is immediately available to the alien. The Department is considering modifying the current system to disallow concurrent I-140 and I-485 filings and instead mandate that a foreign worker applying for adjustment of status be the beneficiary of an approved immigrant petition prior to filing the adjustment application.

Withholding adjudication. An interim rule will expand the circumstances under which DHS may withhold adjudication or toll any applicable regulatory deadline for completion of adjudication of an application or petition.

Extending O and P filing times. This final rule amends DHS regulations to enable certain petitioners to file O and P nonimmigrant petitions up to one year before the petitioners’ need for the worker’s services. Petitioners frequently plan for an event or performance more than one year in advance when seeking O and/or P nonimmigrant workers. By extending the filing time requirement for O and P petitions from the current six months to one year, DHS “hopes to provide relief and assurance to petitioners that, if approvable, such petitions will be approved prior to the date of the petitioners’ need for the alien’s services.”

Reduction of employment verification documents. DHS intends to publish a final rule this year implementing changes to employment verification requirements, including a reduction in the number of documents required.

Elimination of advance parole requirement for H-1 and L workers. DHS plans to publish a final rule that, among other things, eliminates the requirement for permission for overseas travel for adjustment applicants who are maintaining H-1 or L nonimmigrant status.

Significantly changing H-2B agricultural worker regulations. Under the redesigned H-2B temporary nonagricultural program, employers seeking to use H-2B workers, except for applications filed for employment in Guam or in logging, will file directly with the DHS instead of first filing an application for labor certification with the Department of Labor (DOL). Under regulations simultaneously proposed by DOL and DHS, the employer will be required to conduct recruitment before filing its petition. The petition will include a number of attestations concerning labor market and related issues. DHS will administer the petition adjudication process. After adjudication, DOL will audit selected approved petitions. In such audits, DOL will exclusively examine whether the employer has complied with those aspects of the approved petition related to the labor market and other related attestations. Employers will be expected to have documentation available to support their attestations and will be required to provide such documentation to DOL within 30 days from notice of the audit. If, after completion of the audit, DOL determines that the employer has failed to comply with the terms of the attestations contained in the DHS petition or made material misrepresentations in its attestation, DOL will, after notice to the employer and opportunity for a hearing, recommend to DHS that the employer be debarred for a period of up to 3 years.

The DHS’s semiannual regulatory agenda is available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/11dec20060800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/ua061211/ua061009.txt.

As noted, other federal agencies have also issued their semiannual regulatory agendas, some of which have immigration-related components. For example, the Department of State’s agenda has final rules planned on the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System, uncertified foreign health care workers, exchange visitors, and others.

DOS’s agenda is at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/11dec20060800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/ua061211/ua061014.txt. Other federal agency agendas can be found by clicking on the links at http://www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/fedreg/a061211c.html.

Back to Top


16. Recent News from ABIL Members

Charles H. Kuck was quoted in the New York Times in reference to a client of his, Sascha Herrera who was in danger of deportation through no fault of her own. Ms. Herrera, a Colombian, is the wife of Curt Thompson, a Georgia legislator who supports immigrants’ rights. If she is deported, Ms. Herrera could be barred from re-entering for 10 years, Mr. Kuck said, “so we have to work with extreme speed to try to fix this.” The link to the article is http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/03/us/03deport.html(registration is required).
Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2007-01-01 00:00:412019-09-19 00:50:24News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 3, No. 1 • January 01, 2007

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 2, No. 12 • December 01, 2006

December 01, 2006/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. State Dept., DHS Announce New Passport Requirement for Air Travelers -As of January 23, 2007, citizens of the U.S., Canada, Mexico, and Bermuda traveling to the U.S. by air from any part of the Western Hemisphere will be required to present a passport or other accepted document.

2. USCIS Expands Premium Processing to EB-1 Category – Expedited service may now be requested for EB-1 extraordinary ability cases.

3. Labor Dept. Inadvertently Withdraws Labor Certification Cases, Corrects Error – The Office of Foreign Labor Certification is identifying the affected cases and reinstating them.

4. SEVP Implements Five-Year Maximum Program Duration for J Professors and Research Scholars – The new SEVIS release contains the changes necessary to raise from three to five years the maximum duration of participation for J professors and research scholars, among other effects.

5. ‘Schedule A’ Immigrant Visa Numbers Used Up – The 50,000 visa numbers provided for Schedule A workers have become “Unavailable.”

6. USCIS Announces Case Processing Target Times – The agency issued recent guidance to the field outlining case processing timeframes.

7. USCIS Realigns Regional, District, Field Offices – As part of the realignment, USCIS will establish a new Southeast Regional office in Orlando, Florida.

8. USCIS Revamps Web Site, Moves Many Pages – Readers may want to update their bookmarks.

9. Many Venture Capital-Backed Start-Ups Founded by Immigrants, Study Finds – A key lesson of the study is the importance of an open legal immigration system.

10. Uptick in Foreign Student Enrollments Reported – The overall decline in foreign student enrollments appears to have slowed.

11. U.S. ‘World’s Worst’ for Entry Hassles, Survey Finds – But foreign travelers like it here once they get past the initial obstacles.

12. USCIS Launches Pilot Test for New Naturalization Exam – The agency wants to deemphasize the rote memorization of facts.

13. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members


Details:

1. State Dept., DHS Announce New Passport Requirement for Air Travelers

The Departments of State and Homeland Security announced that as of January 23, 2007, citizens of the U.S., Canada, Mexico, and Bermuda traveling to the U.S. by air from any part of the Western Hemisphere must present a passport or other accepted document (such as a Merchant Mariner Document or a NEXUS Air card at designated sites). Permanent residents (green card holders) will continue to be able to use their Alien Registration Card (Form I-551) or other valid evidence of permanent resident status to apply for entry to the U.S. Children who are U.S. citizens will need a passport even if their parents are green card holders.

An individual traveling as a member of the U.S. armed forces on active duty is not required to present a valid passport to enter or depart the U.S. Spouses and dependents, however, must present a passport and valid visa, if applicable.

In the second phase of the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative, targeted for implementation on January 1, 2008, U.S. citizens traveling between the U.S. and Canada, Mexico, Central and South America, the Caribbean, and Bermuda by land or sea may be required to present a valid U.S. passport or other document.

The notice announcing the new travel document requirements is posted at http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2006/76752.htm. A FAQ (frequently asked questions) page is available at http://www.travel.state.gov/travel/cbpmc/cbpmc_2225.html. The full text of the final rule is posted at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/06-9402.pdf.

Back to Top


2. USCIS Expands Premium Processing to EB-1 Category

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that starting on November 13, 2006, premium processing service may now be requested for EB-1 extraordinary ability cases. Premium processing allows U.S. businesses to pay a $1,000 fee in exchange for 15-calendar-day processing of their case.

Since 2001, premium processing service has been available for several nonimmigrant worker classifications, including E treaty traders and investors, H-1B specialty occupation workers, H-2B temporary workers performing non-agricultural services, H-3 trainees, L intracompany transferees, O aliens of extraordinary ability and those performing essential support services, P performers and athletes and those performing essential support services, Q international cultural exchange visitors, R religious workers, and NAFTA professionals from Canada and Mexico. Form I-129 petitions for those nonimmigrant worker classifications will continue to be eligible for premium processing service unless the filing period has closed (for example, when the annual numerical cap for a specific visa classification has been reached).

Also, earlier this year, USCIS began accepting premium processing service requests for petitions involving five other immigrant visa categories: EB-1 outstanding professors and researchers, EB-2 members of professions with advanced degrees or exceptional ability not seeking a national interest waiver, EB-3 professionals, EB-3 skilled workers, and EB-3 workers other than skilled workers and professionals.

The notice announcing the expansion is posted at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/PremiumProcessingRelease_08No06.pdf.

Back to Top


3. Labor Dept. Inadvertently Withdraws Labor Certification Cases, Corrects Error

The Department of Labor’s Office of Foreign Labor Certification (OFLC) reported on November 15, 2006, that because of a “technical issue,” a number of traditional and reduction-in-recruitment (RIR) labor certification cases were identified inadvertently as pending PERM re-file applications and were thus withdrawn from backlog processing. OFLC stated that it was identifying the affected cases and reinstating them to the “appropriate processing status in proper order.”

In other cases, however, withdrawal was appropriate and those cases will not be reinstated. Such cases include PERM re-filings where the use of the earlier traditional or RIR priority date was requested and, therefore, the earlier case was withdrawn.

Affected employers and their attorneys will not be receiving an additional notice of reinstatement but are invited to verify that their case has been reinstated by using the Public Disclosure System (PDS). Users can access the PDS at http://pds.pbls.doleta.gov/ or by clicking on the “Check Backlog Case Status” link on DOL’s Backlog Centers’ Web page (http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/times.cfm). Once the PDS Web page is open, users should enter the 10-digit case number, which begins with a “D” if the case is located in the Dallas BEC or “P” if the case is in the Philadelphia BEC. (Some cases may have had case numbers staring with “T” before data entry was completed at a BEC. All such cases have since been converted and now begin with either “D” or “P,” which should be used for case status checks on the PDS.) After entering the case number, the search results show the current case status. Case status definitions are provided at the bottom of the PDS Web page.

A FAQ about the PDS is available at http://www.workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/foreign/pdf/backlog_faqs_09-11-06_pds.pdf.

Because verification will be available online, OFLC asks employers and attorneys not to contact the BECs regarding the status of such cases. The appropriate BEC will notify the employer or attorney if additional documentation is needed.

OFLC’s notice is posted at http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/ (scroll down to “What’s New”).

Back to Top


4. SEVP Implements Five-Year Maximum Program Duration for J Professors and Research Scholars

The Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) Office has announced that SEVIS 5.4, implemented on November 17, 2006, contains the changes necessary to raise from three to five years the maximum duration of participation for J professors and research scholars, based on a regulation that was published in May 2005. SEVP noted that only exchange visitors administratively classified in a G-7 program will be able to submit a request for an extension beyond the maximum duration of participation of five years. The countdown of the five-year maximum duration begins with the program’s start date and ends five years later, provided that the sponsor does not end or terminate the exchange visitor’s SEVIS record. There is also a new two-year bar on repeat participation in the J professor and research scholar categories for those who complete program participation.

G-7 participants are those under the direct sponsorship of a federally funded national research and development center or a U.S. federal laboratory. These sponsors will be identified in SEVIS as G-7 to differentiate them from other J-1 sponsors. The Department of State directly contacts those sponsors eligible for G-7 classification; no request is necessary on the part of existing sponsors.

SEVP also noted that there has been ongoing discussion about incorporating the J-1 skills list into SEVIS but no decision has been made.

A related technical conference call report is posted at http://www.ice.gov/doclib/sevis/pdf/tech_con_call_qa_20061025.pdf. The May 2005 regulation is posted at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20051800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2005/05-10020.htm. Additional information on changes in SEVIS 5.4 is posted at http://www.ice.gov/doclib/sevis/pdf/sevis_release_5_4_conference_slides.pdf. An implementation notice is posted at http://www.nafsa.org/_/Document/_/anticipated_sevis_release_2.pdf. Details about the changes, including information about how the five-year period is calculated and who is subject to the two-year bar, is posted at http://www.nafsa.org/regulatory_information.sec/get_sevis_information/nafsa_sevis_resources/information_on_sevis.

The Department of State initially announced that the effective date would be November 4, 2006 (see http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/E6-18409.pdf), but implementation of SEVIS 5.4, which was necessary for the rule’s implementation, was delayed until November 17, 2006.

Back to Top


5. ‘Schedule A’ Immigrant Visa Numbers Used Up

The Department of State’s Visa Office announced in the latest Visa Bulletin that the 50,000 immigrant visa numbers provided for Schedule A workers have become “Unavailable” for December. The Schedule A worker category is shown in the December cut-off date table but will be removed from future listings.

Schedule A, Group I includes physical therapists and nurses. Schedule A, Group II includes aliens of exceptional ability in the sciences and arts (except performing arts).

The Visa Bulletin for December 2006 is posted at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3086.html.

Back to Top


6. USCIS Announces Case Processing Target Times

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued recent guidance to the field outlining case processing timeframes:

Rescheduling interviews: USCIS said interviews should be rescheduled at the individual’s request only when there are “compelling extenuating circumstances beyond the individual’s control,” and that the rescheduled interview should occur within 11 weeks of the initially scheduled interview.

Requests for Evidence (RFEs): USCIS noted that an RFE is a “single opportunity” for an individual to provide the requested information and an extension of the standard timeframe cannot be provided. On an application where the applicant could receive interim benefits, USCIS’s objective is to pre-screen the employment authorization document (EAD) and/or advance parole application, the underlying application, and any pending underlying petition within 10 days of filing to identify whether there is any missing initial evidence or required additional evidence. USCIS noted that finding such missing initial evidence or required additional evidence early affects the timing for eligibility for interim benefits (such as advance parole or work authorization).

When a case is missing initial evidence, the RFE stops the 90-day processing clock on the associated EAD and/or advance parole application. The clock starts over when USCIS receives a timely response to a request for required initial evidence. An RFE for additional evidence, however, only suspends the processing clock, which resumes, when USCIS receives a timely response, at the point where it had stopped.

When necessary evidence or information is identified at the interview and USCIS decides that a short-term (generally one to two weeks and no more than a month) opportunity to submit the materials is appropriate, it may be done as an extension of the interview. When more time is warranted, USCIS stated, it should be done as an RFE.

USCIS’s memorandum, which includes additional timeframes, is posted at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/casemgmt.pdf.

Back to Top


7. USCIS Realigns Regional, District, Field Offices

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on November 3, 2006, that it has realigned the management structure of the agency’s regional, district, and field offices. The realignment is intended to better balance workload and personnel among USCIS field offices but does not affect the locations of, or services offered by, local USCIS district offices.

As part of the realignment, USCIS will establish a new Southeast Regional office in Orlando, Florida, which will manage all district and field offices in the southeast region of the U.S. In Florida, the northern district will be based in Tampa and the southern district will be based in Miami. USCIS is also creating two new management districts in Sacramento, California, and Tampa, Florida.

The press release announcing the realignment is posted at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/RealignNR_110306.pdf.

Back to Top


8. USCIS Revamps Web Site, Moves Many Pages

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has replaced its Web site with a redesigned Web portal at the same Internet address (http://www.uscis.gov). Many USCIS Web pages that users have bookmarked have moved as a result of the redesign. USCIS’s Web portal is one of the most heavily trafficked Web sites in the federal government, serving an average of 135,000 visitors daily.

A fact sheet that lists the most frequently requested USCIS Web pages and their new addresses is posted at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/WebFactSheet_110106.pdf. The revised Web site has many flaws, so not all pages on the prior Web site are available yet at the revamped site.

Back to Top


9. Many Venture Capital-Backed Start-Ups Founded by Immigrants, Study Finds

A new study published by the National Venture Capital Association analyzes the positive impact immigrant entrepreneurs and professionals have on the U.S. economy and job creation by starting and working for leading-edge companies in the U.S. Among other things, the study finds that of its 342 survey respondents, 47 percent of the founders of venture capital-backed private companies were immigrants. Almost two-thirds of these founders have started or intend to start more companies in the U.S. Most public and private venture-backed companies founded by immigrants were headquartered in California, and the top industry sectors for private immigrant-founded venture-backed companies were software, semiconductors, and biotechnology. The most common place of birth for the founders of both public and private venture-backed companies was India.

Interestingly, few of the immigrant entrepreneurs identified by the study came to the U.S. ready to start a company. Most entered either as children, teenagers, or graduate students, or were hired on H-1B visas to begin a first job while in their twenties, the study notes.

A key lesson of the study is the importance of an open legal immigration system. Although nearly all the immigrant founders of private companies would still start their companies in the U.S. if given the choice today, more than two-thirds of immigrant entrepreneurs agreed that U.S. immigration policy has made it more difficult than in the past to start a business in the U.S.

Nearly two-thirds of company respondents who use H-1B visas said that current U.S. immigration laws affecting skilled professionals harm American competitiveness, and one-third of privately held venture-backed companies said the lack of H-1B visas had influenced their firm’s decision to place more personnel abroad.

The study, “American Made: The Impact of Immigrant Entrepreneurs and Professionals on U.S. Competitiveness,” is posted at http://www.nvca.org/pdf/AmericanMade_study.pdf.

Back to Top


10. Uptick in Foreign Student Enrollments Reported

NAFSA: Association of International Educators announced on November 13, 2006, that although overall foreign student enrollments at U.S. higher education institutions are down by more than 20,000 from the all-time high of the 2002 academic year, 52 percent of institutions surveyed reported an increase in foreign student enrollments this year as compared to last. Among responding institutions with the largest foreign enrollments, 73 percent reported an increase this year. NAFSA CEO and Executive Director Marlene Johnson said, “While the latest numbers are cause for optimism that the troubling declines of the last several years may be headed toward a recovery, the United States has a lot of work to do to restore its competitiveness for international students and scholars.”

NAFSA also estimated that foreign students and their families spent $13.49 billion in the U.S. during the 2005-2006 academic year, including tuition and fees as well as living expenses. For details on foreign student spending, see http://www.nafsa.org/public_policy.sec/international_education_1/the_economic_benefits.

NAFSA’s announcement about the survey results is posted at http://www.nafsa.org/press_releases.sec/press_releases.pg/06enrollsurveyrel. The full survey report and analysis conducted by a variety of higher education associations are available at http://opendoors.iienetwork.org/page/Fall2006Survey/.

Back to Top


11. U.S. ‘World’s Worst’ for Entry Hassles, Survey Finds

The Discover America Partnership, a travel industry initiative, has released the results of a survey finding that foreign travelers, by a two-to-one margin, named the U.S. as the “world’s worst” for obtaining a visa and entering the country. On the positive side, a majority had an “extremely favorable” experience in the U.S. once they got past the initial hurdles.

Of 2,011 travelers interviewed outside the U.S., 36 percent said they did not want to come to the U.S. because of fears of detention or delay. A full 40 percent said they tried but failed to obtain a visa within the previous two years.

More information and links, including the survey findings and audio of a related conference call, are posted at http://www.poweroftravel.org/release-11-20-06.aspx.

Back to Top


12. USCIS Launches Pilot Test for New Naturalization Exam

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on November 30, 2006, the release of 144 questions and answers for a pilot test intended to help the agency revise the naturalization exam. USCIS will administer the pilot exam in early 2007 to about 5,000 volunteer citizenship applicants in 10 U.S. cities. USCIS Director Emilio Gonzalez explained that the agency wants to deemphasize the rote memorization of facts. The pilot test includes new questions that focus on the concepts of democracy and the rights and responsibilities of citizenship. To draft the new exam questions, USCIS worked with a variety of stakeholders, including history and government scholars, immigrant advocacy groups, citizenship instructors, district adjudications officers, and English as a second language experts.

USCIS plans to work out any problems that are revealed by the pilot test and refine the exam before it is fully implemented nationwide in 2008. When finalized, the exam will have 100 questions but the range of acceptable answers will increase. USCIS also will soon release a new “civics-based vocabulary” to help applicants study for the reading and writing portions of the test.

The announcement is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/NatzTestQs113006.pdf. A fact sheet is posted at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/FactSheetNatzTest113006.pdf. To view the actual pilot exam questions, see http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=dcf5e1df53b2f010VgnVCM1000000ecd190aRCRD.

Back to Top


13. Recent News from ABIL Members

Stephen Yale-Loehr (https://www.abil.com/lawyers-loehr.htm) was interviewed recently by the Associated Press about a recently disclosed Department of Homeland Security data-mining and terrorist/criminal risk-assessment scoring system, the Automated Targeting System (ATS). Under ATS, collected data on travelers may be shared with foreign, federal, or state governments for many purposes, including hiring decisions, security clearances, licensing, contracting, or other benefits. “Everybody else can see [the data], but you can’t,” he noted.

The full text of the article is posted at http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061201/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/traveler_screening. The DHS’s privacy impact statement for ATS is available at http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/privacy/privacy_pia_cbp_ats.pdf.

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2006-12-01 00:00:092019-09-19 00:53:59News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 2, No. 12 • December 01, 2006

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 2, No. 11 • November 01, 2006

November 01, 2006/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. Special Alert: H-1B and EB Backlog Crisis – ABIL has issued a special alert and call to action regarding H-1B cap and EB backlog problems.

2. Undocumented Workers Sue Wendy’s Unit, Houston Law Firm – Plaintiffs allege that permanent residence applications, for which money was deducted from their paychecks, were not filed on their behalf in time.

3. Judge Grants Class Action Status to Tyson Foods Lawsuit – A federal judge granted class action status to a lawsuit alleging that Tyson Foods, Inc., held wages down by hiring undocumented workers.

4. USCIS Announces Extension of Returning Worker Exemption to H-2B Cap – USCIS announced that the “returning worker” exemption to the H-2B cap has been extended for one year.

5. USCIS Announces Filing Change for Extensions or Changes of Nonimmigrant Status for Student Reinstatements – USCIS announced that local USCIS offices are now forwarding any new filings to the California or Vermont Service Center, depending on where the student is engaged in study.

6. Labor Dept. Updates Labor Certification Procedures – The Department of Labor recently released updates to its procedures on reductions in recruitment conversion extensions, the public disclosure system, and what to do when there has been no contact from a Backlog Elimination Center.

7. USCIS Transfers Cases Among Processing Locations – USCIS has shifted benefit processing workloads among service centers.

8. State Dept. Proposes New Limited-Use Passport Card – The Department of State proposes an alternative format passport designed for international land and sea travel between the U.S., Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean, and Bermuda.

9. Unused H-1B1 Visas Available to Employers Who Filed H-1B Petitions on May 26, 2006 – USCIS has made available 89 H-1B1 visa numbers to employers whose FY 2007 H-1B petitions were received by USCIS on May 26, 2006.

10. Advocacy Group Files Second Suit Against Hazleton, PA – The group seeks to put a stop to city laws that mandate stiff penalties for hiring or renting to undocumented individuals.

11. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members


Details:

1. Special Alert: H-1B and EB Backlog Crisis

The inability to hire H-1B workers and delays in obtaining employment-based (EB) green cards are hurting companies, hospitals, and other employers seeking access to the best and brightest global talent. There are no normal H-1B visa numbers available until October 1, 2007. The H-1B visa cap was filled by May 26, 2006, a full 16 months before the end of the next fiscal year. There are also increasing delays in obtaining EB green cards from some countries. As a result, crucial research and development projects in critical industries are being disrupted, and the lives of talented professionals are being put on hold. In many cases, they simply tire of waiting and leave the U.S. to put their knowledge and skills to use in other countries eager to compete with the U.S.

The Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers has issued a special alert and call to action regarding this crisis. Concerned corporate clients should contact their members of Congress by personalized letter, phone call, or personal meeting to let them know how the H-1B cap and EB backlog problems are hurting them. A model letter that client companies can personalize, formulated by the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA), is located at http://capwiz.com/aila2/issues/alert/?alertid=9100046.

Nearly 800 companies, universities, and other entities signed a similar letter last fall, when the H-1B cap last hit. ABIL hopes that even more will sign on this year to have a real impact on Congress during this crucial period.

Another way to help is to send examples of how the inability to hire H-1B workers and the EB green card delays are adversely affecting employers. E-mail any such examples to AILA at [email protected]. If the company is willing to be named, that is ideal, but even examples without attribution will be helpful (e.g., “A manufacturing company in Pennsylvania was unable to hire an H-1B researcher to start in October 2006 because of the H-1B cap. As a result, the company could not launch a new product in its xx division”).

Back to Top


2. Undocumented Workers Sue Wendy’s Unit, Houston Law Firm

Undocumented workers at a Dallas, Texas-area Café Express have sued the chain, which is a unit of Wendy’s International, Inc., as well as the Houston law firm of Boyar & Miller, P.C. The nearly 100 workers allege that Café Express missed a filing deadline in 2001 for green card applications for them. Wendy’s said the situation began before it acquired Café Express in February 2001. Wendy’s subsequently hired new counsel specializing in immigration matters.

The plaintiffs claim that Café Express promised to file the applications for the employees, but Café Express sent a letter to the lead plaintiff and the other workers in July 2006, stating that their applications could not be completed successfully and that, if the workers could not prove they had submitted the applications themselves by the deadline, they would be fired. The workers alleged that they did not realize their applications had not been filed in time until they received the letter, despite the fact that the company charged them $25 per week for legal expenses in connection with the applications for several years following the deadline. The workers seek damages for the money that was deducted from their paychecks, as well as lifetime wages and other legal fees. They also seek special damages because they have lost the opportunity to qualify for permanent residence.

The company stated that only 19 workers have been fired; 25 are still in the application process, another 22 have shown they are work-authorized, and 12 left the company on their own volition.

Back to Top


3. Judge Grants Class Action Status to Tyson Foods Lawsuit

A federal judge has granted class action status to a lawsuit alleging that Tyson Foods, Inc., one of the largest meat producers in the world, held wages down by hiring undocumented workers at eight of its plants in Alabama, Indiana, Missouri, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia. An attorney for the workers said this will allow thousands of workers to seek damages, instead of the four original plaintiffs. A Tyson spokesperson said the ruling was “procedural…and not based on the merits of this case.” A trial date is expected to be set on January 29, 2007.
Back to Top


4. USCIS Announces Extension of Returning Worker Exemption to H-2B Cap

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on October 23, 2006, that the “returning worker” exemption to the H-2B numerical limitation has been extended for one year, until September 30, 2007. Petitions filed for returning H-2B workers do not count toward the semiannual H-2B cap. To qualify, the returning worker must have been counted previously against the H-2B numerical cap in one of the three fiscal years preceding the current year (between October 1, 2003, and September 30, 2006). Any worker not certified as a returning worker is subject to the cap for the relevant fiscal year. Petitions received after the “final receipt date” that contain a combination of returning workers and those subject to the current H-2B cap will be rejected with respect to non-returning workers, and petitioning employers will receive partial approvals for those who qualify as returning workers if otherwise approvable.

USCIS said it will continue to process petitions filed to extend the stay of a current H-2B worker in the U.S.; change the terms of employment for current H-2B workers and extend their stay; allow current H-2B workers to change or add employers and extend their stay; or request eligible H-2B returning workers.

The announcement is available at http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/publicaffairs/newsrels/H2Bextension102306.pdf.

Back to Top


5. USCIS Announces Filing Change for Extensions or Changes of Nonimmigrant Status for Student Reinstatements

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that local USCIS offices are now forwarding any new filings for an Application to Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status (Form I-539) for F-1 and M-1 student reinstatement to the California Service Center (CSC) or the Vermont Service Center (VSC), depending on where the student is engaged in study.

The CSC will receive F-1 and M-1 reinstatement applications from USCIS district and suboffices located in the following states and territories: AK, AZ, CA, CO, GU, HI, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, MI, MN, MO, MT, NE, NV, ND, OH, OR, SD, UT, WA, WI, and WY.

The VSC will receive F-1 and M-1 reinstatement applications from USCIS district and suboffices located in the following states and territories: AL, AR, CT, DE, DC, FL, GA, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MS, NH, NJ, NM, NY, NC, SC, OK, PA, PR, RI, TN, TX, VA, VI, VT, and WV.

Those applying for student reinstatement will receive a receipt notice from the service center that will process their case. USCIS district offices will continue to process student reinstatement cases received before October 30, 2006, using existing procedures. Local USCIS offices will continue to accept the I-539 for the purpose of student reinstatement until provisions are in place to allow for direct mail filing.

USCIS said it is not necessary for those who previously filed an application at a local USCIS office to file a new application because of this change of procedure.

The announcement is available at http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/publicaffairs/statements/FilingChange102506.pdf.

Back to Top


6. Labor Dept. Updates Labor Certification Procedures

The Department of Labor (DOL) recently released the following updates to its labor certification procedures:

RIR conversion extension. Because the Reduction in Recruitment (RIR) application processing takes significantly less time than traditional recruitment (TR), the Department of Labor (DOL) previously encouraged employers to convert TR applications to RIR. The Office of Foreign Labor Certification (OFLC) announced recently that it is extending the application date for employers who wish to convert their TR applications to RIR applications. Any TR application (excluding those for schedule B occupations) submitted to a state workforce agency with a postmark dated on or before March 28, 2005, may request conversion to RIR by following the established process. For additional information, see the frequently asked questions (FAQ) at http://www.workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/foreign/pdf/backlog_faqs_10-06-06.pdf.

Public disclosure system. The OFLC has received many requests from employers, attorneys, and workers regarding the status of applications being processed as part of the backlog elimination effort. To provide basic case status information on specific cases, OFLC has introduced the Backlog Public Disclosure System (PDS). The purpose of the PDS is to provide a way for employers, attorneys, agents, and workers to determine the status of an application filed at a Backlog Elimination Center (BEC). Users can access the PDS at http://pds.pbls.doleta.gov/ or by clicking on the “Check Backlog Case Status” link on DOL’s Backlog Centers’ Web page (http://workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/foreign/times.asp).

Once the PDS Web page is open, users enter the 10-digit case number, which begins with a “D” if the case is located in the Dallas BEC or “P” if the case is in the Philadelphia BEC. (Some cases may have had case numbers staring with “T” before data entry was completed at a BEC. All such cases have since been converted and now begin with either “D” or “P,” which should be used for case status checks on the PDS.) After entering the case number, the search results show the current case status. Case status definitions are provided at the bottom of the PDS Web page.

A FAQ about PDS is available at http://www.workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/foreign/pdf/backlog_faqs_09-11-06_pds.pdf.

Those who discover problems with the status of their cases (e.g., the case has been closed or withdrawn erroneously) may e-mail information and documentation to [email protected] or [email protected].

Sources note that, beginning in November, the DOL plans to issue monthly updates of BEC TR case processing dates. The DOL reportedly is currently working on cases with an April 2001 filing date and does not expect that date to advance any time soon.

Sources note that, beginning in November, the DOL plans to issue monthly updates of BEC TR case processing dates. The DOL reportedly is currently working on cases with an April 2001 filing date and does not expect that date to advance any time soon.

To provide such employers with the opportunity to have their applications processed while also guarding against potential fraud, OFLC has established steps for employers or their attorneys to follow, outlined in the FAQ at http://www.workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/foreign/pdf/backlog_faqs_09-11-06_nobec.pdf.

This process is only intended for cases where the employer or attorney has received no contact whatsoever from the BEC about the case, not for status checks or other case inquiries. Also, this process is only intended for employers or their designated attorneys. Beneficiaries of labor certification applications are not authorized to use this process.

The full text of the DOL’s updates is available at http://www.workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/foreign/ (scroll down to “What’s New”).

Back to Top


7. USCIS Transfers Cases Among Processing Locations

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) periodically shifts benefit processing workloads from one agency service center to another. Most recently, USCIS made the following changes:

Form I-129: Because of unusually high workload surges over the past several months, the Vermont Service Center (VSC) transferred nearly 20,000 H-1B petitions subject to the fiscal year 2007 annual numerical cap to the Texas Service Center (TSC) and 6,000 cap-subject H-1B petitions to the Nebraska Service Center (NSC), rather than to its “sister” service center (California Service Center (CSC)) under USCIS’s bispecialization initiative.

Form I-360: The VSC, TSC, and NSC transferred all pending petitions requesting classification as a special immigrant religious worker to the CSC. In addition, all new I-360 religious worker filings received at a service center other than the CSC are being transferred to the CSC.

Form I-130: Over the past several months, the VSC transferred approximately 20,000 green card petitions for alien relatives to the CSC.

Affected applicants will receive a transfer notice from USCIS. Applicants should direct inquiries to the service center where the case is currently located.

USCIS also noted that Requests for Premium Processing Services (Forms I-907) should be filed with the service center where the case is currently pending.

The notice announcing the transfers is available at http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/publicaffairs/statements/CaseTrans_092906PN.pdf.

Back to Top


8. State Dept. Proposes New Limited-Use Passport Card

The Department of State (DOS) issued a proposed rule on October 17, 2006, proposing an alternative format passport designed for international land and sea travel between the U.S., Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean, and Bermuda. Under the proposed rule, passport cards, like passport books, would be issued for a 10-year validity period for U.S. citizens 16 years of age and older, and for a five-year validity period for U.S. citizens under 16 years of age. The DOS proposes to use the same application procedures and adjudication standards for the passport book and card and to permit U.S. citizens to hold both a book and a card simultaneously. In addition, if a passport applicant holds a valid passport book, the applicant may apply for a passport card as a renewal and pay the lower renewal fee rate. The DOS said the passport card is designed to address the needs and travel patterns of U.S. citizens who live in land border communities and frequently cross the border in their day-to-day activities. The passport card will not be usable globally but only in the situations set forth above.

The DOS will accept public comments until December 18, 2006. The full text of the proposed rule is available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/E6-17237.pdf.

Back to Top


9. Unused H-1B1 Visas Available to Employers Who Filed H-1B Petitions on May 26, 2006

According to sources, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has made available an additional 89 H-1B1 visa numbers that are available only to citizens of Chile or Singapore but were not used in fiscal year (FY) 2006. Any unused H-1B1 numbers from a given fiscal year are added to the next year’s pool of H-1B visa numbers.

The 89 visa numbers will be available to employers whose FY 2007 H-1B petitions were received by USCIS on the “final receipt date” for FY 2007 (May 26, 2006) but were not selected by the random lottery that USCIS conducted to determine which of the cases received on that date would be applied toward the FY 2007 cap. USCIS plans to send a letter or e-mail to affected employers and/or their attorneys outlining the procedures to be followed. Employers with cases submitted on May 26 who do not receive a letter by November 8, 2006, may send an e-mail to USCIS at: [email protected]. USCIS also would like employers in this category who are not pursuing the H-1B petition to send an e-mail to the same address.

Back to Top


10. Advocacy Group Files Second Suit Against Hazleton, PA

On October 30, 2006, the Hazleton Hispanic Business Association, several undocumented individuals, and a businessman filed a second lawsuit against Hazleton, Pennsylvania. The group seeks to put a stop to city laws that, among other things, require landlords who rent to undocumented individuals to pay heavy fines, require tenants to register their contact information, and require tenants to pay fees to obtain rental permits. The laws previously were revised following suits filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania and the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund.
Back to Top


11. Recent News from ABIL Members

Angelo A. Paparelli (http://www.entertheusa.com/) will participate in a panel on workplace enforcement pitfalls for employers at Northwestern University School of Law’s upcoming symposium, “What You Should Know About Workplace Enforcement and Immigration,” to be held on November 20, 2006, from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. in Thorne Auditorium, Arthur Rubloff Building. The symposium is co-sponsored by the Federal Bar Association and the Immigration Policy Center. The panel’s topics will include in-house audits, special rules and risks for subcontractors, and mergers and acquisitions. Other symposium topics include I-9 audits; Social Security numbers and no-match letters; the future of workplace immigration compliance; labor and employment issues (including basic employer obligations, common violations, and remedies for worker exploitation); a shift in Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s strategy in favor of pursuing egregious employer violators; and representing the targeted employer, executives and managers.

For more information on symposium content, contact: Margaret H. McCormick, phone: (312) 427-6163; e-mail: [email protected]. To register, contact: Immigration Policy Center, American Immigration Law Foundation, 918 F Street, NW, Washington, DC 20004; phone: (202) 742-5600; e-mail: [email protected].

Vincent Lau, Senior Associate at Flynn & Clark, P.C., will be participating once again as a guest speaker at the Immigration Law Seminar sponsored by Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education. The seminar spans two days, November 14 and 15, and covers both employment-based and family-based immigrant and nonimmigrant matters. Vince will be speaking on visas for visitors for business or pleasure,TN status for Canadian professional occupations, and the Visa Waiver Pilot Program. For more information, see http://www.mcle.org/MCLE_Web/scriptcontent/custom/UpcomingProg/upcmngprg_dtl.cfm?meetingcode=2070055P01&desc=S

Steve Clark, Shareholder at Flynn & Clark, P.C., will be a guest speaker at a meeting of the American Immigration Lawyers Association in Worcester, Massachusetts, on November 1. Steve will speak on recent developments in PERM labor certifications and procedures to expedite cases at the Backlog Elimination Centers.

Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer’s annual Fall Seminar, “Get Ready for Changes to Immigration Laws,” examined employment-based immigration issues affecting hospitals, universities, and research institutions. It was held on October 25, 2006, at the Union League in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. This year’s seminar featured a special session for newcomers to the field: “Fundamentals of Immigration Law.” This year’s seminar was Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer’s most successful ever, with a record turnout.

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2006-11-01 00:00:092019-09-19 00:57:10News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 2, No. 11 • November 01, 2006

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 2, No. 10 • October 01, 2006

October 01, 2006/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. ABIL Issues Holiday Travel Warning, Update on VWP Program, Biometric Passport Requirements – ABIL reminds travelers to ensure that their passports, visas, and other documents are current and in order well in advance of the busy holiday travel season; biometric passport requirements for VWP-participating countries are set to take effect on October 26.

2. USCIS Expands Premium Processing Service – EB-1, EB-2, and EB-3 immigrant visa categories have been added to premium processing service.

3. Shifts in Visa Number Availability Kick Off New Fiscal Year – Although visa numbers have not fully recovered, there has been some movement in the employment-based categories.

4. State Dept. Instructs on Effective Business Referral Programs – Posts throughout the world have established business facilitation programs to ensure that they are responsive to the needs of the U.S. business community.

5. 2008 Diversity Visa Lottery Instructions Released – Entries for the DV-2008 lottery must be submitted electronically between October 4 and December 3, 2006.

6. USCIS Eliminates Locally Produced Employment Authorization Cards – USCIS is phasing out the I-688B.

7. USCIS Expands Pilot Program on Permanent Resident Applications – USCIS has expanded a pilot program that changes the procedures for filing a green card application based on a family relationship, the diversity visa lottery, or qualification for most special immigrant categories.

8. Dep’t of Labor Updates Procedures on Backlogged Cases, Launches Web Site for Checking Status of Applications – The DOL has issued a FAQ on backlogged cases that have received “no contact” from the agency, and has launched a Web site for checking case status.

9. USCIS Announces Elimination of Naturalization Backlog – USCIS announced the elimination of the backlog for the N-400 Naturalization Application and the reduction of backlogs overall.

10. New Report Issued on Immigration and America’s Future – The Migration Policy Institute recommended policy changes to harness the benefits of immigration to advance U.S. interests in the 21st century.

11. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members


Details:

1. ABIL Issues Holiday Travel Warning, Update on VWP Program, Biometric Passport Requirements

The Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers (ABIL) reminds travelers to ensure that their passports, visas, and other documents are current and in order well in advance of the busy holiday travel season. Travelers should also remember that because of heightened security measures, delays are possible and full compliance with security procedures is necessary.

For most applicants, a personal appearance interview is required as a standard part of visa processing. Additionally, applicants affected by security procedures are informed of the need for additional screening at the time they submit their applications and are being advised to expect delays. The time needed for adjudication of individual cases will continue to be difficult to predict. For travelers, the need for an interview will mean additional coordination with the embassy or consulate to schedule an interview appointment. Individuals should build in ample time before their planned travel date when seeking to obtain a visa. To estimate how long you will have to wait to get an interview appointment to apply for a visa (not including any additional time required for special clearances and administrative processing), see the Department of State’s “Visa Wait Times for Interview Appointment,” http://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/wait/tempvisitors_wait.php (choose the consular location from the drop-down menu and click on “Get Wait Times”).

Some applicants must obtain advance parole (advance permission to travel) to leave the U.S. while their applications are pending. Advance parole processing time is now averaging about 3.5 months (up from about two months last year), so sufficient lead time to apply for parole, if needed, should be factored into travel preparations. For more information on advance parole requirements and procedures, see http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/services/Emergency/index.htm.

On September 7, 2006, at a hearing before the Senate Subcommittee on Terrorism, Technology, and Homeland Security, Jess T. Ford, Director of International Affairs and Trade for the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), recommended that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) strengthen its efforts to mitigate risks inherent in the Visa Waiver Program (VWP) available to citizens of specified countries. (See http://foia.state.gov/masterdocs/09fam/0941002X2.pdf for a list of countries eligible for admission for up to 90 days upon presentation of a round-trip ticket and passport of such a country.) The DHS has acknowledged that an undetermined number of inadmissible individuals may have entered the U.S. using stolen or lost passports from VWP countries, he noted. Because of such concerns, Congress periodically considers restricting the VWP. Mr. Ford’s testimony (GAO-06-1090T) is available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d061090t.pdf. The GAO’s related report (GAO-06-854) is available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06854.pdf.

Biometric passport requirements for VWP-participating countries are set to take effect on October 26, 2006. Those countries will be required to begin issuing passports with integrated circuit chips containing biometric information. Each VWP country is at a different stage in its development of secure passports, but VWP travelers who obtained machine-readable passports (MRPs) before October 26, 2005, are not required to have a digital photograph or contact-less chip. This means that if you obtained or renewed/extended an MRP before October 26, 2005, you will not be required to get another passport for travel until your MRP expires. Passports issued or renewed/extended between October 26, 2005, and October 25, 2006, must be machine-readable and include a digital photograph printed on the data page; passports issued or renewed/extended on or after October 26, 2006, must be machine-readable and include the integrated chip.

A handy guide for VWP travelers is available at http://cbp.gov/linkhandler/cgov/travel/id_visa/vwp/vwp_timeline.ctt/vwp_timeline.pdf. For general information on biometrics and electronic tagging, see “The Frontiers of Privacy Law: Technology Marches On” (http://www.pli.edu/emktg/toolbox/Privacy_Tech33.doc – scroll down for article), published by the Practising Law Institute.

Back to Top


2. USCIS Expands Premium Processing Service

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced the addition of three categories to the premium processing service, which allows U.S. businesses to pay a $1,000 fee in exchange for 15-day processing of the case. On September 25, 2006, USCIS began accepting premium processing requests for the Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker (Form I-140) for the EB-1B (outstanding professors and researchers); EB-2 (members of professions with advanced degrees or exceptional ability not seeking a national interest waiver); and EB-3 (workers other than skilled workers and professionals, including unskilled labor requiring less than two years of training or experience) immigrant visa categories. In addition, on August 28, 2006, USCIS added EB-3 professionals and skilled workers to categories eligible for premium processing. After these two announcements, all I-140 employment-based immigrant visa petitions will qualify for premium processing other than EB-1A extraordinary ability, EB-1C multinational manager, EB-2 national interest waiver, and EW unskilled waiver petitions.

Since 2001, premium processing service has been available for several nonimmigrant classifications within the Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker (Form I-129), including E treaty traders and investors, H-1B specialty occupation workers, H-2B temporary workers performing nonagricultural services, H-3 trainees, L intracompany transferees, O aliens of extraordinary ability and those performing essential support services, P performers and athletes and those performing essential support services, Q international cultural exchange visitors, R religious workers, and NAFTA professionals from Canada and Mexico.

For more information on premium processing for the three added EB immigrant visa categories, see http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/publicaffairs/newsrels/PremProc092206PR.pdf.

Back to Top


3. Shifts in Visa Number Availability Kick Off New Fiscal Year

The Department of State has issued the Visa Bulletin for October 2006, which is the start of fiscal year 2007. Although visa numbers have not fully recovered, there has been some forward movement in the employment-based categories. For example, the EB-2 category for India was unavailable beginning in August; the new cut-off date for October is June 15, 2002 (although this actually represents a retrogression from the January 1, 2003, cut-off date in existence before the category became unavailable).

It has also been reported that numbers in the Schedule A category (nurses, physical therapists, and certain persons with exceptional abilities in the arts or sciences that are exempt from labor certification) may be exhausted soon, possibly as early as November. Once that occurs, it will still be possible to file immigrant visa applications for such persons, but they will be subject to the priority dates of the underlying visa category (e.g., EB-2 or EB-3) for their occupation.

Family-based visa numbers also recovered from the steep retrogression imposed last quarter, but not to the cutoff dates previously in existence.

The October Visa Bulletin is available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3032.html.

Back to Top


4. State Dept. Instructs on Effective Business Referral Programs

In a recent cable to all diplomatic and consular posts, the Department of State noted that facilitating access to timely visa appointments for business travelers is one of the Bureau of Consular Affairs’ highest priorities. Businesses are looking for a predictable way to factor the visa process into their travel planning. Posts throughout the world have established business facilitation programs to ensure that the Department is responsive to the needs of the U.S. business community while continuing to maintain visa security standards. Many such programs are conducted in coordination with American Chambers of Commerce (AMCHAMs) overseas.

The Department noted that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce recently polled regional AMCHAMs on consular sections’ business facilitation programs. Survey respondents commended consular sections that allow for group appointments or set aside a specific day or block of time to handle business visa applications. Respondents also cited clearly written procedures and established channels of communication as the most important factors in establishing a successful business facilitation program. Some AMCHAM members complained that programs seem to shift with the arrival of each new section chief, and that changes are not always communicated clearly and promptly.

The Department also noted that having a designated point of contact in the consular section is essential. Model programs include AMCHAM Buenos Aires, where each company designates its own specific officer to communicate with the Chamber’s Visa Office. The AMCHAM ensures that the visa application is arranged in a standard format, provides a job letter showing the applicant’s position, salary, and length of service, and provides remote data entry. The AMCHAM holds regular meetings with member-company coordinators and provides training to new and current members. It stresses the need to study each applicant thoroughly before scheduling appointments, noting that its productive relationship with the consular post stems from maintaining daily contact with the consular section and the call center.

For more information on these efforts and model programs, see the Department’s cable at http://travel.state.gov/visa/laws/telegrams/telegrams_3033.html.

Back to Top


5. 2008 Diversity Visa Lottery Instructions Released

The Department of State’s Bureau of Consular Affairs has released instructions for the 2008 Diversity Immigrant Visa Program. Entries for the DV-2008 lottery must be submitted electronically between noon EDT (GMT-4) October 4, 2006, and noon EST (GMT-5) Sunday, December 3, 2006. Paper entries will not be accepted. Applicants may access the electronic DV entry form and instructions at http://travel.state.gov/visa/immigrants/types/types_1318.html during the registration period. Because heavy demand may result in Web site delays, applicants are strongly encouraged not to wait until the last week to enter. Also, receipt of more than one entry per person will disqualify the person from registration. There is no fee.

For DV-2008, natives of the following countries are not eligible to apply because these countries sent more than 50,000 immigrants to the U.S. over the previous five years: Brazil, Canada, China (mainland-born), Colombia, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Haiti, India, Jamaica, Mexico, Pakistan, Philippines, Peru, Poland, Russia, South Korea, United Kingdom (except Northern Ireland) and its dependent territories, and Vietnam. Persons born in Hong Kong SAR, Macau SAR and Taiwan are eligible.

To enter the lottery, a person must have either a high school education or its equivalent, or two years of work experience within the past five years in an occupation requiring at least two years of training or experience to perform. The Department of Labor’s O*Net OnLine database will be used to determine qualifying work experience. Certain people from ineligible countries may qualify on the basis of their spouse’s or parent’s country of birth. For additional details on entry procedures and requirements, see http://travel.state.gov/pdf/DV_2008_Final.pdf.

Back to Top


6. USCIS Eliminates Locally Produced Employment Authorization Cards

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) currently issues two types of employment authorization documents: Form I-766, Employment Authorization Document (EAD), and Form I-688B, Employment Authorization Card. The I-766 is produced in Kentucky and accounts for approximately 88 percent of the EADs produced on behalf of USCIS; the remainder are produced at various field offices. Because of various issues with the locally produced cards, such as outdated card technology, obsolete equipment, and lack of maintenance, USCIS is phasing out the I-688B. This affects both locally produced interim EADs and non-interim EADs.

As part of this initiative, USCIS will no longer accept I-765 filings for non-interim EADs at local offices. Applications that were received at any local office through September 30, 2006, have been forwarded to the appropriate Service Center or the Chicago Lockbox for processing. Such applications received on or after October 1, 2006, will be returned and the individual will be advised to file directly with the appropriate Service Center or Lockbox indicated on the I-765 instructions. The agency recommends that applicants seeking to replace an expiring EAD file the I-765 at least 100 days before the current card expires.

For additional information on filing procedures and adjudication issues, see http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/lawsregs/handbook/ElimI688B_081806R.pdf. For information specific to asylees’ EADs, see http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/publicaffairs/statements/AsyleeEAD091406PN.pdf.

Back to Top


7. USCIS Expands Pilot Program on Permanent Resident Applications

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has expanded a pilot program that changes the procedures for filing a permanent residence (“green card”) application (Form I-485) based on a family relationship, the diversity visa lottery, or qualification for most special immigrant categories. Under the expanded pilot program, affected applicants residing within the jurisdiction of the Dallas District Office (effective October 23, 2006; terminating on September 21, 2007), El Paso District Office, or Oklahoma City Sub-Office (the latter two offices are effective November 20, 2006; terminating on September 21, 2007) will be required to file the I-485 and any necessary documentation and fees in person at the appropriate local office, rather than by mail, after self-scheduling an appointment using the Internet-based InfoPass (http://infopass.uscis.gov/). The pilot program is intended to test this alternative to current filing and processing procedures with the goal of achieving a 90-day processing time for affected I-485s.

For more information on the pilot program, see http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/06-7791.pdf.

Back to Top


8. Dep’t of Labor Updates Procedures on Backlogged Cases, Launches Web Site for Checking Status of Applications

The Office of Foreign Labor Certification (OFLC) of the Department of Labor (DOL) has developed a process for an employer or attorney who believes an application should be pending at a Backlog Elimination Center (BEC) but for which no contact (e.g., no 45-Day Center Receipt Notification Letter (CRNL), case closed letter, or other correspondence about the case) has been received from the BEC. To provide these employers with the opportunity to have their applications processed while also guarding against potential fraud, OFLC has established specific steps for employers or their attorneys to follow, which are outlined in a FAQ at http://www.ows.doleta.gov/foreign/pdf/backlog_faqs_09-11-06_nobec.pdf.

Inquiries must be sent to the appropriate e-mail provided in the FAQ by October 11, 2006. This process is only for employers or their designated attorneys; beneficiaries of labor certification applications are not authorized to use the process. The process is not intended for status checks or other case inquiries, but is to be used only in those cases for which the employer or attorney has received no contact whatsoever from the BEC.

The DOL also has launched a Web site for pending applications filed at a Backlog Elimination Center (BEC). The Office of Foreign Labor Certification (OFLC) has received many requests from employers, attorneys, and applicants regarding the status of applications being processed as part of the backlog elimination effort. To provide basic case status information on specific cases, OFLC introduced the Backlog Public Disclosure System. The status of a case (but not estimated processing times) may be checked at http://www.pbls.doleta.gov/pbls_pds.cfm by entering the ETA case number. The system currently checks only cases beginning with a D (Dallas) or P (Philadelphia).

Back to Top


9. USCIS Announces Elimination of Naturalization Backlog

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced the elimination of the backlog for the N-400 Naturalization Application. USCIS completed approximately 342,290 backlogged cases and average processing times have fallen from a previous high of 14 months in February 2004 to approximately five months as of September 2006.

The overall backlog of all applications has decreased from 3.8 million in 2004 to just over 1.1 million as of July 2006, USCIS noted. Of the gross backlog of 1.1 million applications, 140,000 cases are considered “backlogged and under USCIS control” as of July. Cases considered as within USCIS’s control are defined as those that are ready to be adjudicated. Cases outside USCIS’s control that are not counted as included in the net backlog include cases that are pending law enforcement security checks, naturalization test retakes, naturalization candidates awaiting scheduling of a judicial ceremony, and cases in which an applicant has failed to respond to a request for additional evidence.

For more on the elimination of the naturalization backlog, see http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/publicaffairs/newsrels/N400Bklg091506NR.pdf.

Back to Top


10. New Report Issued on Immigration and America’s Future

The Migration Policy Institute’s Independent Task Force on Immigration and America’s Future has released its final report, “Immigration and America’s Future: A New Chapter.” Recognizing that U.S. immigration policies are increasingly disconnected from the economic and social forces that drive immigration, the Independent Task Force asked what kind of immigration policy and system would harness the benefits of immigration to advance U.S. interests in the 21st century. Over the past year, the Task Force, a bipartisan panel of leaders and experts, evaluated the economic, social, and demographic factors driving today’s large-scale immigration to the U.S., both legal and illegal. The final report presents several far-ranging recommendations. For more information on the report, see https://secure2.convio.net/mpi/site/Ecommerce/251378812?store_id=1241&product_id=2161&VIEW_PRODUCT=true&JServSessionIdr006=6vton3y7f1.app13b.
Back to Top


11. Recent News from ABIL Members

Angelo A. Paparelli (http://www.entertheusa.com/) was recently quoted in the American Bar Association’s eReport Journal. In U.S. v. Romm, the 9th Circuit declined to rule on whether searching the contents of a laptop is routine because the issue was not raised in an appeal. The Supreme Court has said, however, that “border searches of belongings are always routine, so long as the belongings aren’t hurt,” Mr. Paparelli noted. He said he is aware of at least one instance in which a customs agent asked for an e-mail password so the officer could examine the individual’s e-mail correspondence. “Imagine if that were the password of a company employee, and it led the agent into a corporate network database,” he noted. The article, Border Insecurity – 9th Circuit: Laptops May Be Subject to Customs Inspections After Overseas Trips, is available at http://www.abanet.org/journal/ereport/s15border.html.

Steven A. Clark, Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers (ABIL) member and past president of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, will speak on a panel in New York on October 10, 2006, with William Carlson, Chief, National Headquarters, Division of Foreign Labor Certifications, U.S. Department of Labor at the Practising Law Institute’s Annual Immigration and Naturalization Institute. Further information is available at http://www.pli.edu/product/program_detail.asp?ptid=511&stid=3&id=EN00000000026844.

Cyrus D. Mehta (http://www.cyrusmehta.com/)has authored Finding the ‘Golden Mean’ in Dual Representation – Updated,” which appears in the August 2006 issue of Immigration Briefings. The “golden mean,” Mr. Mehta writes, serves as a starting point for a discussion on how an attorney can represent two clients with potentially differing interests.

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2006-10-01 00:00:182019-09-19 01:00:15News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 2, No. 10 • October 01, 2006

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 2, No. 9 • September 01, 2006

September 01, 2006/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. USCIS Expands Premium Processing Service, Issues New Form – USCIS has begun accepting premium processing requests for EB-3 professional and EB-3 skilled worker petitions.

2. Labor Dept. Asks BALCA to Return Cases for Processing – BALCA was asked to return numerous cases held pending a decision in In re HealthAmerica, the first appeal of a labor certification denial under the new PERM system, in which the employer prevailed.

3. Activists Challenge Cities’ Crackdown on Undocumented Immigration – Cities around the country have begun passing tough measures to restrict undocumented immigration, but activists are challenging the new requirements.

4. US-VISIT’s Biometric Entry Procedures Deploying to Additional Locations – US-VISIT’s biometric entry procedures are being expanded to additional locations in Fresno, New Orleans, and Halifax.

5. USCIS Releases FAQ on Completing I-9 Verification Form – USCIS has provided answers to employers’ questions about how to complete employment authorization verification using the I-9 form.

6. U.S. Embassy, State Dept. Release Guidance on Visa Processing for Lebanese – Beirut has resumed immigrant visa processing and limited nonimmigrant visa processing; processing for all other visitor visa categories remains suspended until further notice.

7. AAO Says Film and Video Director Qualifies as H-1B Specialty Occupation – In an unpublished decision, USCIS’s Administrative Appeals Office directed that a petition for a film and video director be approved because the petitioner established that the proffered position qualified as a specialty occupation.

8. State Dept. Proposes to Require Passports at Certain POEs Beginning in January – The DOS proposes to require that U.S. citizens and nonimmigrants from Canada, Bermuda, and Mexico entering the U.S. at air and most sea ports of entry present a valid passport beginning in January.

9. USCIS Plans to Digitize Alien Files – Congress has provided funding for the digitization of approximately one million A-files per year.

10. Council of Graduate Schools Notes Rise in Foreign Grad Student Population – After a lull last year, graduate student applications and admissions are on the upswing.

11. Study Finds Immigration Increases Have Not Hurt Employment for U.S. Workers – The Pew Hispanic Center’s new report shows that large increases in immigration have not hurt overall employment prospects for U.S. workers.

12. NAFSA Releases Statement on Comprehensive Immigration Reform – NAFSA says that Senate-passed comprehensive immigration reform legislation contains important provisions that would bolster the U.S. position in the competition for international students and scholars.

13. Employment Third Preference Visa Availability May Retrogress – It cannot be assumed that recent advances in the employment third preference cut-off dates will continue during the coming months and retrogression is possible.

14. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members


Details:

1. USCIS Expands Premium Processing Service, Issues New Form

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that as of August 28, 2006, it has begun accepting premium processing requests for EB-3 professional and EB-3 skilled worker petitions. EB-3 professionals include immigrant workers with bachelor’s degrees who are members of the professions; EB-3 skilled workers include immigrant workers capable of performing skilled labor requiring at least two years of education, training, or experience.

Under premium processing, USCIS guarantees a petitioner that it will issue an approval notice, a notice of intent to deny, or a request for evidence, or that it will open an investigation for fraud or misrepresentation, within 15 calendar days of receipt. If the petition is not processed within 15 calendar days, USCIS will refund the fee and continue to process the request on an expedited basis. The fee for premium processing is $1,000. Employers may file for both categories using the Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker (Form I-140). A new Request for Premium Processing Services (Form I-907) has been issued and, as of August 28, 2006, previous versions of the form are no longer being accepted.

In addition to faster processing, participating petitioners may use a dedicated telephone number and e-mail address to check on the status of their petitions or ask questions.

Since 2001, premium processing has been available for several classifications using the Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker (Form I-129), including E treaty traders and investors, H-1B specialty occupation workers, H-2B temporary workers performing agricultural services, H-3 trainees, L intracompany transferees, O aliens of extraordinary ability and those performing essential support services, P performers and athletes and those performing essential services, Q international cultural exchange visitors, R religious workers, and NAFTA professionals from Canada and Mexico. I-129 petitions for these nonimmigrant worker classifications will continue to be eligible for premium processing service unless the filing period has closed (for example, when the annual numerical limit for a specific category has been reached).

USCIS’s announcement is available at http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/publicaffairs/newsrels/PremProc081806NR.pdf.

Back to Top


2. Labor Dept. Asks BALCA to Return Cases for Processing

The Department of Labor (DOL) has asked the Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals (BALCA) to return to the DOL’s certifying officers (COs) for processing numerous cases the BALCA was holding pending a decision in In re HealthAmerica. In that decision, which was the first appeal of a labor certification denial under the new PERM system, the BALCA found that the CO abused his discretion in denying the employer’s labor certification application. Specifically, the application had been denied on the basis of a non-material typographical error; the employer, on a motion to reopen, presented evidence that was in existence at the time the application was filed that demonstrated its compliance with the law.

The letter sent from Gary M. Buff, the DOL’s Associate Solicitor for Employment and Training, to John M. Vittone, Chairman of the BALCA, states that the COs have reviewed HealthAmerica and concluded that no purpose would be served in filing briefs in cases that were held in abeyance pending the decision. There may be potentially significant differences between the facts in at least some of these cases and the facts in HealthAmerica, Mr. Buff acknowledged, but he said that how those distinctions affect the adjudication of a particular case would be dealt with “more appropriately” by the COs in a new determination. The DOL therefore requested that “the relief provided for in HealthAmerica be applied to all of the cases being held in abeyance. Those cases should be returned to the [CO] for review in order to complete processing of these cases in accordance with that decision.”

The HealthAmerica decision is available at http://www.oalj.dol.gov/Decisions/ALJ/PER/2006/In_re_HEALTHAMERICA_2006PER00001_(JUL_18_2006)_072241_CADEC_SD.PDF. Mr. Buff’s August 2 letter is at http://www.bibdaily.com/pdfs/Sheinfeld 8-2-06.pdf.

Back to Top


3. Activists Challenge Cities’ Crackdown on Undocumented Immigration

Cities around the country have begun passing tough measures to restrict undocumented immigration. For example, Hazleton, Pennsylvania voted in July to fine landlords $1,000 if they rent to an undocumented immigrant; deny permits to businesses that hire the undocumented; and make English the city’s official language. The Puerto Rican Legal Defense Fund and the American Civil Liberties Union, along with other groups on behalf of Hazleton residents, business owners, and nonprofits, sued Hazleton on August 15, 2006, arguing that the federal government has exclusive power to regulate immigration under the U.S. Constitution and that the new ordinance is discriminatory and unworkable.

Mayor Lou Barletta said he believes “this will be a landmark case. A line has been drawn here in Hazleton. This will impact cities all across the country.” He said that undocumented immigration is “destroying small towns” and that he has received requests from officials of 30 towns asking for a copy of Hazleton’s new law.

A similar lawsuit was filed against Riverside, New Jersey, for passing such an ordinance. Measures are being voted on — and protested — in other localities around the U.S. as well. Stay tuned.

Back to Top


4. US-VISIT’s Biometric Entry Procedures Deploying to Additional Locations

The Department of Homeland Security announced on August 15, 2006, that the US-VISIT program’s biometric entry procedures are being expanded to additional locations in Fresno, California; New Orleans, Louisiana; and Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. The procedures include digital, inkless finger scans and digital photographs.

Specifically, Fresno Yosemite International Airport began biometric screening on August 15, 2006. The Erato Street Cruise Terminal in New Orleans will begin biometric screening on October 15, 2006. The new pre-flight inspection location at Halifax International Airport will become the eighth pre-flight location in Canada to use US-VISIT biometric screening starting on a date to be announced later.

Since US-VISIT launched in 2004, more than 62 million people have been processed at U.S. ports of entry.

The announcement is available at http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/display?content=5804. General information about US-VISIT is available at http://www.dhs.gov/us-visit.

Back to Top


5. USCIS Releases FAQ on Completing I-9 Verification Form

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ USCIS Today publication includes a frequently asked questions (FAQ) section. The August 2006 issue’s FAQ provides answers to employers’ questions about how to complete employment authorization verification using the I-9 form. Among other things, the FAQ notes that an employer “is not required to know with absolute certainty whether a document is genuine or false.” USCIS notes that the law merely requires that an employer examine the original document, not a photocopy, and make a good-faith determination that the document appears to relate to the employee, appears to be genuine, and is listed as an acceptable document on the back of the I-9 form.

The FAQ is available at page 7 of USCIS Today, http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/publicaffairs/USCISToday_August_06.pdf.

Back to Top


6. U.S. Embassy, State Dept. Release Guidance on Visa Processing for Lebanese

The Consular Section in Beirut, Lebanon reportedly has resumed immigrant visa processing as of August 24, 2006, and has resumed limited nonimmigrant visa processing as of August 28 for F, H, J, L, M, O, and P applicants. Processing for all other visitor visa categories remains suspended until further notice. Embassy Athens was designated as the immigrant visa processing post for Lebanese nationals until Embassy Beirut could resume normal visa operations. Embassy Athens may be contacted at http://www.usembassy.gr. Lebanese immigrant visa applicants may address related inquiries to [email protected].

The Department of State has issued guidance at http://travel.state.gov/visa/laws/telegrams/telegrams_2998.html.

Back to Top


7. AAO Says Film and Video Director Qualifies as H-1B Specialty Occupation

In an unpublished decision issued August 15, 2006, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) approved an H-1B nonimmigrant visa petition for a film and video director to work in entertainment. The AAO found that the petitioner established that the proffered position qualified as a specialty occupation.

The AAO noted that the Department of Labor’s Occupational Outlook Handbook does not state that a baccalaureate-level education is normally the minimum requirement for entry into such a position. In this particular case, however, the AAO said that the duties of the position are so specialized and complex that the knowledge required to perform them is usually associated with the attainment of a bachelor’s or higher degree. Much of the work to be performed involves the transformation of images into special-effect animated digital media. “Motion-capture is an area of expertise that requires the use of specialized equipment and personnel,” the AAO noted, adding that the beneficiary “is involved in virtually all areas of project production and development, including the editing of the final product.” The AAO further pointed out that the petitioner has a master of fine arts degree in motion picture, television and recording arts, which is closely related to the duties of the proffered position and qualifies the beneficiary to perform the duties of the position.

Back to Top


8. State Dept. Proposes to Require Passports at Certain POEs Beginning in January

The Department of State (DOS) issued a notice of proposed rulemaking on August 11, 2006, that would require as of January 8, 2007, that U.S. citizens and nonimmigrants from Canada, Bermuda, and Mexico entering the U.S. at air ports of entry (POEs) and most sea POEs, with certain limited exceptions, present a valid passport. The proposed rule would not change the requirements for U.S. citizens and nonimmigrant aliens entering from Canada, Bermuda, and Mexico and certain types of arrivals by sea (e.g., ferries and pleasure vessels), which will be addressed in a separate, future rulemaking. The DOS said this proposed rule is the first phase of a joint plan by the Departments of Homeland Security (DHS) and State to implement new requirements under the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, which provides that U.S. citizens and nonimmigrant aliens may enter the U.S. as of January 1, 2008, only with passports or alternative documents designated by the DHS.

General information about the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative, as it is called, is available at http://travel.state.gov/travel/cbpmc/cbpmc_2223.html. The proposed rule is available at http://frwebgate2.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate.cgi?WAISdocID=990935416742+0+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve. Comments on the proposed rule are due September 25.

Back to Top


9. USCIS Plans to Digitize Alien Files

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on August 17, 2006, that it has established a new Records Digitization Facility (RDF) in Williamsburg, Kentucky, to digitize more than one million USCIS alien files (A-files). USCIS said it plans to use the digitized files “to begin the transformation of its business processes.” Congress has provided funding for the digitization of approximately one million files per year. There are approximately 70 million immigration records, which means it would take USCIS 70 years to digitize all its records.

USCIS said the digitized A-files can be made available to multiple users at the same time, and can be made available immediately without shipping or handling. The agency noted that the ability to make the files available to multiple users simultaneously is valuable especially when files are needed “for law enforcement or national security reasons.”

USCIS said the digitized A-files can be made available to multiple users at the same time, and can be made available immediately without shipping or handling. The agency noted that the ability to make the files available to multiple users simultaneously is valuable especially when files are needed “for law enforcement or national security reasons.”

The announcement is available at http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/publicaffairs/newsrels/Digitizn081706PR.pdf.

Back to Top


10. Council of Graduate Schools Notes Rise in Foreign Grad Student Population

The Council of Graduate Schools released data on August 9, 2006, that show a continued increase in foreign enrollments in U.S. graduate educational programs. The total number of foreign applications for graduate school in the U.S. is up 12 percent for fall 2006. The numbers vary considerably from country to country, however. For example, although notable increases are coming from China and India, admissions offers fell for applicants from the Middle East. The highest increase was in offers of admission to engineering students; offers in the arts and humanities were slightly down even though more applications in those fields were submitted. The Council of Graduate Schools said the overall increase is a “hopeful sign of a recovery in international admissions” after last year’s disappointing results.

The report notes that a variety of new practices were undertaken that might be resulting in the improvement in numbers, such as new international programs or collaborations; new or additional staff time devoted to international students; new funding for international recruitment trips; and new funding for marketing and promotion of graduate programs.

An article on the report by Inside Higher Ed is available at http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/08/09/intl. The Council of Graduate Schools’ full report, which includes a table in the appendix showing the percent change in applications and offers of admission from 2005 to 2006, is available at http://www.cgsnet.org/portals/0/pdf/R_intladm06_II.pdf.

Back to Top


11. Study Finds Immigration Increases Have Not Hurt Employment for U.S. Workers

The Pew Hispanic Center released a study on August 10, 2006, showing that large increases in immigration since 1990 have not hurt overall employment prospects for U.S. workers. Other factors, such as economic growth, played a larger role than immigration, said Rakesh Kochhar, the author of the study. He noted that immigration may affect job markets in local areas but that there were no national trends supporting such a link. The study did not examine the effects of immigration on wages. The report is available at http://pewhispanic.org/reports/report.php?ReportID69. An article summarizing the report’s findings is available at http://www.federalnewsradio.com/index.php?sid=876849&nid=78.
Back to Top


12. NAFSA Releases Statement on Comprehensive Immigration Reform

NAFSA: Association of International Educators released a statement on August 3, 2006, estimating that international students and their dependents spend more than $13 billion on the U.S. economy each year. NAFSA said that attracting international students and scholars promotes U.S. foreign policy and international leadership and supports the U.S. position in cutting-edge innovation. The statement notes that Senate-passed comprehensive immigration reform legislation “contains important provisions that would bolster the U.S. position in the competition for international students and scholars,” and that NAFSA is “alarmed by the attempts of the House leadership to promote the idea that nothing else should be done until the border is secure.” NAFSA quoted New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg: “It is as if we expect border control agents to do what a century of Communism could not — defeat the natural forces of supply and demand and defeat the natural human instinct for freedom and opportunity. You might as well sit on the beach and tell the tide not to come in.”

NAFSA’s statement is available at http://www.nafsa.org/press_releases.sec/press_releases.pg/comprehensive_immigration. NAFSA has summarized its position in a June 2006 report, Restoring U.S. Competitiveness for International Students and Scholars, available at http://www.nafsa.org/_/Document/_/restoring_u.s.pdf.

Back to Top


13. Employment Third Preference Visa Availability May Retrogress

The Department of State noted in its Visa Bulletin for September 2006 that the employment third preference cut-off date for most countries has advanced rapidly in recent months in an effort to maximize number use under the annual numerical limit. As a result, applicant demand for numbers, particularly for adjustment of status cases at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) offices, is expected to increase significantly. Therefore, it cannot be assumed that such advances will continue during the coming months. The Visa Bulletin noted that the Department of Labor expects to complete its backlog reduction effort during fiscal year (FY) 2007. This effort “will result in tens of thousands of cases, including many with very early priority dates, becoming eligible for processing” at USCIS offices, which could require the retrogression of the employment third preference cut-off dates at any time during FY 2007, the Department said.

The Visa Bulletin for September 2006 is available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3009.html.

Back to Top


14. Recent News from ABIL Members

Charles H. Kuck, ABIL member and Vice President of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA), read a statement at a press conference on August 14, 2006, that subsequently was entered into the Congressional Record as testimony before the House of Representatives’ Workforce Protections Subcommittee. Mr. Kuck expressed his support of the wage provisions in the Senate’s version of comprehensive immigration reform legislation. Among other things, Mr. Kuck noted that the prevailing wage provision in the Senate legislation “is designed to prevent employers from recruiting guest workers willing to work for a wage that will adversely affect the living standards and wages of American workers,” and helps to ensure “that guest workers are hired only when labor markets are tight.” He said the prevailing wage provision of S. 2611 is a “minimum, but necessary, standard.” Mr. Kuck’s statement is available at http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=20290#search=%22%22statement%20in%20support%20of%20comprehensive%20immigration%20reform%22%20kuck%22.

Stephen Yale-Loehr, ABIL member and chairman of AILA’s Business Visa Committee, has co-authored an article summarizing recent developments in employer sanctions enforcement. The article includes a list of tips to help employers comply with employer sanctions requirements without violating antidiscrimination laws. The article, “Criminalizing Employer Sanctions: Employers Walk a Tightrope,” is available at http://www.law.com/jsp/nylj/PubArticleNY.jsp?hubtype=FeaturedContent&id=1156425446156.

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2006-09-01 00:00:272019-09-19 01:03:37News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 2, No. 9 • September 01, 2006

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 2, No. 8 • August 01, 2006

August 01, 2006/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. H-1B Exemption Cap Reached for FY 2007 – USCIS announced that it has met the exemption limit of 20,000 for fiscal year 2007 for H-1B petitions requesting foreign workers who have earned a master’s or higher degree from a U.S. institution of higher education.

2. USCIS Urges H-2B Employers To Continue To Identify, Certify “Returning Workers” Despite Expiration of Provisions – USCIS urges prospective H-2B employers to continue to identify and certify those workers who qualify as “returning workers” under current law when filing petitions for employment start dates in FYs 2006 and 2007.

3. USCIS Announces Transfer of Nonimmigrant Worker Cases – The Vermont Service Center transferred nearly 5,000 nonimmigrant worker petitions to the Texas Service Center.

4. DHS Proposes Expanding US-VISIT to Additional Non-U.S. Citizens; GAO Criticizes US-VISIT Contracts -The DHS issued a proposed rule that would expand processing in the US-VISIT program to an additional number of non-U.S. citizens.

5. USCIS Discontinues Locally Produced I-688B Employment Authorization Cards – USCIS is discontinuing local production of EACs in favor of the EAD produced at one central location.

6. DHS Seeks To Create ‘Industry Standard’ on Building Legal Workforces With New IMAGE Program – The ICE Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers (IMAGE) is intended to build cooperative government-business relationships to strengthen hiring practices and reduce unlawful employment of foreign workers.

7. Participation in Basic Pilot Verification Program Is Accelerating, USCIS Says – More than 10,000 U.S. employers are participating in the Basic Pilot employment verification program.

8. DHS Official Testifies at House Hearing on Regional Immigration Issues – The goal of visa policy coordination efforts with Canada and Mexico is that a traveler at a Canadian or Mexican port of entry will experience substantially the same screening as a traveler bound for the U.S.

9. TPS Extended for Somalia – The re-registration period began on July 27, 2006, and ends on September 25, 2006.

10. GAO Analyzes Benefits and Limitations of Using Earnings Data to Identify Unauthorized Work – The GAO outlined the key characteristics of possible data sources the DHS could use to identify unauthorized work.

11. State Dept. Announces Retrogression of India Employment-Based Category, Other News – For August, the Department of State’s Visa Office said it has been necessary to retrogress cut-off dates in several employment-based visa categories for India.

12. USCIS Issues Final Rule on Affidavits of Support – Among other things, the final rule retains a “significant ownership interest” threshold, for purposes of an affidavit of support, of five percent or more in a for-profit entity.

13. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members


Details:

1. H-1B Exemption Cap Reached for FY 2007

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on July 28, 2006, that it has met the exemption limit of 20,000 for fiscal year (FY) 2007 for H-1B petitions requesting foreign workers who have earned a master’s or higher degree from a U.S. institution of higher education. Petitions received on July 26, 2006 are being subjected to a random selection process, described below, and USCIS will reject petitions requesting such a worker that are received after that date unless the petition is otherwise eligible for a separate cap exemption.

USCIS has implemented the following procedure for FY 2007 H-1B filings:

  • If USCIS determines that the numerical limits have been exceeded, the agency will identify those H-1B petitions seeking a FY 2007 number that were received on that date.
  • USCIS will then conduct a computer-generated random selection of the petitions received on that date to allocate any remaining FY 2007 H-1B numbers.
  • After random selection, any remaining H-1B petitions that do not receive a FY 2007 number and are not otherwise exempt will be rejected and returned.
  • Returned petitions will be accompanied by the filing fee.
  • Petitioners may resubmit their petitions when H-1B visa numbers become available for FY 2008.
  • The earliest date a petitioner may file a petition requesting FY 2008 H-1B employment with an employment start date of October 1, 2007, would be April 1, 2007.

Petitions for current H-1B workers do not count toward the H-1B cap. Accordingly, USCIS will continue to process petitions filed to extend the amount of time a current H-1B worker may remain in the U.S., change the terms of employment for current H-1B workers, allow current H-1B workers to change employers, or allow current H-1B workers to work concurrently in a second H-1B position.

USCIS also noted that petitions for new H-1B employment are exempt from the annual cap if the worker will be employed at an institution of higher education or a related or affiliated nonprofit entity, or at a nonprofit research organization or governmental research organization.

The USCIS announcement is available at http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/publicaffairs/newsrels/H1BMasters072806PR.pdf.

Back to Top


2. USCIS Urges H-2B Employers To Continue To Identify, Certify “Returning Workers” Despite Expiration of Provisions

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has reminded employers using the H-2B nonimmigrant visa program that the “returning worker” provisions of the Save Our Small and Seasonal Businesses Act of 2005 (SOS Act) are set to expire on October 1, 2006, the first day of fiscal year (FY) 2007. USCIS urges prospective H-2B employers to continue to identify and certify those workers who qualify as returning workers under current law when filing petitions for employment start dates in FYs 2006 and 2007. USCIS said this will enable the agency to maintain an accurate cap count of H-2B nonimmigrant workers for FY 2007 regardless of whether the returning worker provisions expire or are reauthorized.

To ensure accurate H-2B cap counting, USCIS is preparing for several scenarios: (1) the provisions are not extended, or (2) the provisions are extended by future legislation, either before or after the scheduled sunset of the provision at the close of FY 2006. Bills extending the provisions have been passed by the Senate, but whether or when they will be extended by Congress in enacted legislation “is a matter entirely within the discretion of Congress,” USCIS noted.

Petition forms and processing will follow current rules, with additional requirements for returning workers, USCIS said. Details on the additional requirements are available at http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/publicaffairs/statements/H2BSOSExmp072806PN.pdf. A sample returning worker attestation may be found at http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/formsfee/forms/files/H2B_Attestation.pdf.

USCIS noted that petitions filed by prospective H-2B employers for returning workers with requested employment start dates of September 30, 2006 or earlier will continue to be approved by USCIS if all other eligibility requirements are met, and those returning workers identified and certified within such petitions will be deemed exempt from the FY 2006 cap despite the fact that their work for the H-2B employer will almost certainly extend into FY 2007, even if the SOS Act is not extended.

As a result of the expiration of the returning worker provisions of the SOS Act, however, USCIS noted that all petitions requesting H-2B workers for new employment with a start date of October 1, 2006 or later (FY 2007 employment) must be counted toward the annual H-2B cap of 66,000 for FY 2007, whether or not the workers would be recognized as H-2B returning workers under the provisions currently applicable to FY 2006 start dates. In the event that the “returning worker” provisions of the SOS Act are reauthorized by FY 2007, and if employers continue to identify and certify “returning workers” in their H-2B filings, USCIS will be able to identify appropriate individuals as cap-exempt and adjust the running cap count for H-2Bs accordingly, thus making more numbers available to other workers. USCIS said that if Congress has not extended the SOS Act by the time USCIS reaches the 33,000 cap for the first half of FY 2007 for H-2B workers (including those provisionally designated as “returning workers”), USCIS will give notice that the cap has been reached and will reject further cap-subject H-2B filings.

Petitions for current H-2B workers do not count toward the congressionally mandated H-2B cap. Accordingly, USCIS will continue to process petitions filed to extend the stay of a current H-2B worker in the U.S., change the terms of employment for a current H-2B worker, or allow a current H-2B worker to change or add employers.

Back to Top


3. USCIS Announces Transfer of Nonimmigrant Worker Cases

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on July 26, 2006 that the Vermont Service Center (VSC) recently transferred nearly 5,000 nonimmigrant worker petitions (Forms I-129) to the Texas Service Center (TSC). VSC also transferred approximately 22,000 alien relative immigrant visa petitions (Forms I-130) to the California Service Center (CSC). USCIS said “[c]ustomers should not be alarmed if they receive notices” from TSC or CSC about a case initially mailed to VSC. “When customers receive such a notice, they should route any questions about their case to the service center from which they received their last notice.” USCIS said it reserves the right to transfer additional cases in the future should that become necessary to ensure timely case processing in the event of workload surges.
Back to Top


4. DHS Proposes Expanding US-VISIT to Additional Non-U.S. Citizens; GAO Criticizes US-VISIT Contracts

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a proposed rule on July 27, 2006 that would expand processing under the US-VISIT program to an additional number of non-U.S. citizens, including:

  • lawful permanent residents of the U.S.;
  • individuals entering the U.S. who seek admission on immigrant visas;
  • individuals entering the U.S. who seek admission as refugees and asylees;
  • certain Canadian citizens entering the U.S. for specific business or employment reasons (Form I-94 holders) (excluding most Canadian citizens entering the U.S. as B-1/B-2 visitors to shop, visit friends and family, vacation, or take a short business trip);
  • individuals paroled into the U.S.; and
  • individuals applying for admission to Guam under the Guam Visa Waiver Program.

Those subject to US-VISIT may be required upon entry or departure to provide fingerscans, photographs, or other biometric identifiers. Comments on the proposed rule may be submitted by August 28, 2006. For details, see the announcement (http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/display?theme=43&content=5762&print=true) and proposed rule (http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/E6-11993.pdf).

Meanwhile, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) recently issued a report finding that US-VISIT contracts have not been managed or overseen effectively. The GAO made recommendations to the DHS to ensure that effective contract management and financial controls are established and implemented both for contracts managed by the US-VISIT program office and for those managed by other agencies. The full text of the GAO report, “Homeland Security: Contract Management and Oversight for Visitor and Immigrant Status Program Need to be Strengthened” (GAO-06-404), is available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06404.pdf.

Back to Top


5. USCIS Discontinues Locally Produced I-688B Employment Authorization Cards

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on July 28, 2006 that it is discontinuing local production of Employment Authorization Cards (EACs/Forms I-688B) in favor of the Employment Authorization Document (Form I-765) produced at one central location. USCIS said the locally produced I-688B lacks security features and is not well-suited to verification.

USCIS explained that as of April 1, 2005, applications for employment authorization were centralized at the USCIS service centers and the National Benefits Center (via the Chicago Lockbox). Some local USCIS offices continued to accept employment authorization applications, however, and produced EACs using local systems. USCIS said that such offices, in their discretion, may continue to accept “certain employment authorization applications until October 1, 2006.” After September 1, 2006, however, such local offices will no longer directly process those cases but will forward them for service center processing. Those seeking the fastest service should send their applications directly to the appropriate service center or Chicago Lockbox, as set forth in the I-765 instructions. As of October 1, 2006, USCIS local offices will no longer accept any I-765 filings.

The discontinuation of locally produced EACs will not prohibit people from using InfoPass to schedule an appointment for an interim employment document when USCIS has not adjudicated the original I-765 within 90 days, USCIS said. The agency recommends that applicants seeking to replace an expiring EAD file the I-765 at least 100 days before the current card expires.

The USCIS announcement is at http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/publicaffairs/statements/EADFilingCh072806PN.pdf.

Back to Top


6. DHS Seeks To Create ‘Industry Standard’ on Building Legal Workforces With New IMAGE Program

The Department of Homeland Security announced on July 26, 2006 an initiative and best business practices to help employers ensure that they are building legal workforces through voluntary partnerships with the U.S. government. The “ICE Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers (IMAGE)” is intended to build cooperative government-business relationships to strengthen hiring practices and reduce unlawful employment of foreign workers. The initiative also seeks to effect greater industry compliance and corporate due diligence through enhanced federal training and education of employers, DHS said.

The DHS said IMAGE has been designed to provide answers to the flood of questions the agency has received from employers seeking information on how to avoid hiring unauthorized workers. “[P]rosecutions are only part of the solution,” said DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff. “If the government is going to fully address the problem of illegal alien employment, it must partner with employers, educate them and provide them with the tools they need to develop a stable, legal workforce.”

Companies that join the program and comply with the terms of IMAGE will become “IMAGE certified,” a distinction that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), a DHS agency, believes will become an industry standard. Under the program, ICE will partner with companies representing a broad cross-section of industries. The companies will serve as “charter members” of IMAGE and will be liaisons to the larger business community, DHS said. As part of the program, businesses must adhere to a series of best practices, including the use of the Basic Pilot employment verification program administered by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. ICE will provide training and education to IMAGE partners on proper hiring procedures, fraudulent document detection, and antidiscrimination laws. ICE will share data with employers on the latest schemes used to circumvent legal hiring processes. The agency also will review the hiring and employment practices of IMAGE partners and will work collaboratively with them to correct “isolated, minor compliance issues.”

As a first step, companies must agree to an audit of their Employment Eligibility Verification (I-9) forms, and must use the Basic Pilot program when hiring employees. For more information on this and other USCIS verification programs, see https://www.vis-dhs.com/EmployerRegistration/StartPage.aspx?JS=YES&AccessMethod=.

To become IMAGE-certified, partners also must adhere to best practices, including the creation of internal training programs for completing I-9s and detecting fraudulent documents. IMAGE partners must arrange for audits by “neutral parties” and must establish protocols for responding to Social Security no-match letters. ICE also is asking employers to establish a tip line for employees to report violations and mechanisms to self-report violations to ICE. A full list of best practices is available at http://www.ice.gov/partners/employers/worksite/besthire.htm.

More information on IMAGE is available at http://www.ice.gov/partners/opaimage/index.htm. Frequently asked questions can be found at http://www.ice.gov/partners/opaimage/image_faq.htm. Information packets can be requested at http://www.ice.gov/exec/opaimage/image_program_request.asp. The press release announcing the IMAGE initiative is available at http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/display?theme=43&content=5757&print=true.

Back to Top


7. Participation in Basic Pilot Verification Program Is Accelerating, USCIS Says

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced recently that more than 10,000 U.S. employers are participating in the Basic Pilot employment verification program, which allows employers to run online work authorization checks against Social Security Administration and Department of Homeland Security databases. Participation in the free program has more than doubled during the first three quarters of this fiscal year, USCIS said. Participating businesses are verifying the work authorization of over one million new hires each year at 36,000 hiring sites across the U.S.

The program was launched in selected states beginning in late 1997, and was expanded in late 2004 to allow employers in all 50 states and the District of Columbia to participate. Employers may register online for the program at https://www.vis-dhs.com/EmployerRegistration.

Back to Top


8. DHS Official Testifies at House Hearing on Regional Immigration Issues

Cresencio Arcos, the Assistant Secretary for International Affairs of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), testified at a hearing held on July 26, 2006 in the House of Representatives’ Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere on regional immigration issues. Mr. Arcos said, among other things, that the DHS and the Department of State are working on visa policy coordination with Canada and Mexico “as an effort to implement policies and procedures that will lead to comparable decisions about travelers destined to North America.” The goal, he said, is that a traveler at a Canadian or Mexican port of entry will experience substantially the same screening as a traveler bound for the U.S.

Mr. Arcos also noted that the two departments are working with Canada and Mexico to further coordinate the list of countries whose nationals are permitted to travel “visa free” to or within North America. He pointed out that since the terrorist attacks in the U.S. on September 11, 2001, a notable visa policy change included Canada’s decision to impose a visa requirement on nationals of Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, and Costa Rica, while Mexico decided to require citizens of South Africa, Brazil, and Ecuador to present a visa to enter Mexico lawfully. The reimposition last year by Mexico of a visa requirement for Brazilians decreased dramatically the inflow of undocumented Brazilians across the southwest border, Mr. Arcos said.

Mr. Arcos urged Congress to pass comprehensive immigration reform legislation that includes a combination of border enforcement efforts in cooperation with international partners; increased enforcement within the U.S., including an expanded employment compliance and enforcement program to address unauthorized employment; and a temporary worker program that will provide “a legal avenue for employers to fill their labor needs when U.S. workers are available.”

The full text of Mr. Arcos’s testimony is available at http://wwwc.house.gov/international_relations/109/arc072606.pdf.

Back to Top


9. TPS Extended for Somalia

The Department of Homeland Security announced on July 27, 2006, an 18-month extension of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for nationals of Somalia until March 17, 2008. Under the extension, Somalis who already have TPS are eligible to live and work in the U.S. for an additional 18 months while maintaining their status. DHS also automatically extended the validity of their employment authorization documents for an additional six months until March 17, 2007. Approximately 250 nationals of Somalia (or aliens having no nationality who last habitually resided in Somalia) may be eligible for re-registration.

Nationals of Somalia with TPS must re-register during the 60-day re-registration period, which began on July 27, 2006, and ends on September 25, 2006. For details, see the USCIS press release announcing the extension, http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/publicaffairs/newsrels/Somalia_TPS_060727.pdf; a related fact sheet, http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/publicaffairs/questsans/Somalia_TPS_060727.pdf; and the Federal Register notice, http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/06-6401.pdf.

Back to Top


10. GAO Analyzes Benefits and Limitations of Using Earnings Data to Identify Unauthorized Work

As the House of Representatives and Senate consider immigration reform legislation, some proposals would give the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) access to earnings data to identify unauthorized workers. To better understand how such data could be used, the House Ways and Means Subcommittees on Social Security and Oversight asked the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to review how the DHS uses earnings data that it already receives from the Social Security Administration (SSA) and recommend changes or improvements.

The GAO noted that access to earnings data maintained by the SSA and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) could help the DHS target its limited worksite enforcement resources to help identify potential unauthorized work. The GAO outlined key characteristics of the following possible data sources, which the GAO noted contain sensitive personal information:

  • SSA’s Nonwork Alien File: This file contains earnings and demographic data for over 500,000 individuals who earned income using Social Security numbers (SSNs) issued for nonwork purposes. The DHS estimated that about one-third are work-authorized.
  • SSA’s Earnings Suspense File: This file contains earnings reports with names and SSNs that do not match the SSA’s records. Employers submitting large numbers of unmatched reports may indicate the employment of unauthorized workers. The file also includes much information about U.S. citizens, however, including records that are the result of errors, in addition to persons using false SSNs or SSNs belonging to others, or persons for whom the employer has no SSN. About 8 million to 11 million records are added annually, but the number of unauthorized workers is unknown.
  • The Department of Health and Human Services’ National Directory of New Hires: This file contains updated reports on new hires and quarterly wages on almost all workers, including U.S. citizens, for child support enforcement purposes. Over 500 million quarterly wage records and over 60 million new hire reports are entered yearly. The file contains only records with names and SSNs that match the SSA’s records; names and SSNs that do not match are maintained separately.
  • IRS’s Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers (ITINs) with wage income: The IRS could identify taxpayers who filed tax returns using an ITIN and had wage income. To be issued an ITIN, an individual must be ineligible for an SSN. About 530,000 ITIN holders submitted tax returns with wage income in 2001. IRS officials believe that almost all returns filed with ITINs claiming wages are from unauthorized workers.
  • DHS’s Electronic Employment Eligibility Verification Transaction Data: DHS maintains transaction records of employment eligibility verification queries electronically submitted by participating employers. Under the voluntary Basic Pilot program, employers made over 900,000 queries in fiscal year 2005. If made mandatory, these data potentially could be used for worksite enforcement.

The full text of the GAO report, “Immigration Enforcement: Benefits and Limitations to Using Earnings Data to Identify Unauthorized Work” (GAO-06-814R), is available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06814r.pdf.

Back to Top


11. State Dept. Announces Retrogression of India Employment-Based Category, Other News

For August, the Department of State’s Visa Office said it has been necessary to retrogress cut-off dates in several employment-based visa categories for India in an effort to hold issuance levels within the applicable annual numerical limits for the affected categories. Employment-based retrogressions include India’s employment-based second preference category, which has become “Unavailable,” and India’s employment-based third preference category, which has retrogressed to April 1, 2001.

Also, the Department noted that immigrant visa number use is approaching the annual limits for the year in many categories, and the supply of numbers remaining for allocation is limited. Therefore, it is increasingly possible that additional retrogressions of cut-off dates in September, similar to those experienced in August, will occur. Readers should not assume visa availability until the cut-off dates are announced. Categories that could experience retrogressions include the Worldwide employment-based fourth preference category; the China employment-based second and third preference categories; the India employment-based first preference category; and the Mexico employment-based third preference category.

A total of 50,000 numbers were provided for use in the Schedule A (EX) visa category established last May. Visa demand in this category is approaching that limit and may require the establishment of a cut-off date as early as October, the Department reported. Once all 50,000 numbers have been made available under the current limitation, processing under this category will end.

Also, the Department has determined the employment-based numerical limits for fiscal year 2006. The numerical limit for the Worldwide employment-based preference category is 143,949.

The full text of the August 2006 Visa Bulletin is available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_2978.html.

Back to Top


12. USCIS Issues Final Rule on Affidavits of Support

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a final rule, effective July 21, 2006, that applies to any immigrant visa or adjustment of status application decided on or after that date even if the case was filed beforehand. Among other things, the final rule eliminates the affidavit of support requirement in cases where the sponsored immigrant establishes, on the basis of Social Security Administration records, that he or she has already worked, or can be credited with working, 40 quarters of covered employment.

The final rule also clarifies that the sponsor’s income in the year in which the intending immigrant filed the application, rather than the earnings last reported to the Internal Revenue Service, generally bears the greatest evidentiary weight in determining whether the affidavit of support is sufficient, although USCIS may request updated evidence.

The law and regulations require the submission of an affidavit of support in the case of an employment-based immigrant if a relative of the immigrant either filed the visa petition or has a “significant ownership interest” in the entity that did so. The interim affidavit of support regulation defined “significant ownership interest” as an ownership interest of five percent or more in a for-profit entity. The final rule retains the five percent threshold adopted in the interim rule.

Also, several commenters asked USCIS whether the affidavit of support requirement applies to employment-based immigrants if the relative with the significant ownership interest is not a U.S. citizen or resident alien. USCIS explained that, for employment-based immigrants, the purpose of the affidavit of support is to ensure that a relative who could file a family-based visa petition will not use employment as a means to avoid the affidavit of support requirement that would apply if the relative were to file a relative visa petition. Relatives who are not U.S. citizens or resident aliens are ineligible to file relative visa petitions. For this reason,the regulations define “relative,” for purposes of the affidavit of support requirement, to include only those family members who can file relative visa petitions. The final rule clarifies that a relative must be either a “U.S. citizen or a resident alien” for the affidavit of support requirement to apply to an employment-based immigrant.

The final rule, published in 71 Fed. Reg. 35732–35757 (June 21, 2006), is available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/06-5522.pdf. A related Department of State cable is available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/laws/telegrams/telegrams_2863.html.

Back to Top


13. Recent News from ABIL Members

ABIL co-founding member Stephen Yale-Loehr, who also chairs the business immigration committee for the American Immigration Lawyers Association, was quoted on July 14, 2006, by GovExec.com on the Senate immigration reform bill. He said that new requirements for employers will help to constrain cheating. The Senate bill requires more stringent job applicant identification, makes employers liable if they show “reckless disregard” when workers present fake documents, and requires employers to store employment documents for five years, he told GovExec.com. He cautioned that the desire for rapid identification must be balanced with privacy concerns. “We need some hard data” on the effectiveness of employment verification technology before making its use mandatory, he said. The full text of the article is at http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0706/071406nj1.htm.
Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2006-08-01 00:00:542019-09-19 01:06:49News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 2, No. 8 • August 01, 2006

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 2, No. 7 • July 01, 2006

July 01, 2006/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. ‘SKIL’ Bill Introduced in House; Would Benefit Employment-Based Immigration – The House of Representatives’ version of the ‘SKIL’ (Securing Knowledge Innovation and Leadership) bill was introduced on June 29, 2006.

2. USCIS Announces Filing Location Change for Employment-Based Adjustments – USCIS announced changes to the filing location for employment-based applications for lawful permanent resident status.

3. DHS Issues Proposed Rule on SSN Matches, ‘Safe Harbor’ Verification Procedures – DHS has proposed to amend regulations on the legal obligations of an employer when the employer receives a no-match Social Security letter and on “safe-harbor” procedures an employer can follow.

4. ICE Issues Interim Rule on Retaining I-9s Electronically – ICE has issued an interim rule providing that employers may sign and retain I-9 verification forms electronically.

5. State Department Issues Notice on New Passport Requirements – The Dept. of State proposes to implement in phases the requirement that travelers to and from the Caribbean, Bermuda, Panama, Mexico, and Canada will need a passport or other secure, accepted document to enter or re-enter the U.S.

6. No Action Yet in Congress on Comprehensive Immigration Reform Bills, But States Aren’t Waiting; Hearings Planned – The Senate and House have been unable to resolve their differences on comprehensive immigration reform legislation but members of Congress are calling for more hearings both in Washington, D.C., and around the country.

7. Senate Holds Hearing on Work Authorization Verification Enforcement – The Senate’s Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Citizenship held a hearing on immigration enforcement at the workplace.

8. USCIS Releases Guidance on Permanent Offers of Employment for Outstanding Professors and Researchers – USCIS has released guidance on applying the definition of “permanent employment” when adjudicating EB-1 petitions filed on behalf of outstanding professors and researchers.

9. USCIS Releases New Guidance on H-1B Cap Exemptions – USCIS has released new guidance for adjudicators on how determinations should be made with respect to the exemption from the H-1B cap for those who have earned a master’s or higher degree from a U.S. institution, and on eligibility for exemptions based on the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act.

10. State Dept. Instructs on How Consular Officers Determine Whether a Student Visa Applicant is Qualified – At the onset of the busy student visa season, the Department of State released information on how its consular officers will be making decisions about whether student visa applicants are qualified.

11. TPS Extended for Salvadorans – The 60-day re-registration period begins on July 3, 2006, and will remain in effect until September 1, 2006.

12. GAO Finds Labor Dept’s Oversight of H-1B Program Lacking; House Holds Hearing – The GAO has found that the Department of Labor’s review of H-1B applications is timely but lacks quality assurance controls and may overlook some inaccuracies.

13. State Dept. Reports on Visa Number Usage, Availability – A Dept. of State representative recently commented on China employment-based numbers and general availability for the remainder of the fiscal year.

14. State Dept. Issues Final Rule on Review of Nonimmigrant Visa Issuances, Refusals – The final rule focuses on an increase in reviews of visa issuances to enhance border security.

15. USCIS Ombudsman Lists ‘Pervasive and Serious Problems’ – The ombudsman’s annual report to Congress lists “pervasive and serious problems,” including, among others, backlogs and prolonged processing times

16. Sign-On Letter Supports Immigration – Over 500 economists have signed on to the Open Institute’s “Open Letter on Immigration,” which notes the benefits to the U.S. of immigration.

17. Google Launches New Government Information Search – Google U.S. Government Search provides a single location for searching across U.S. government information and keeping updated on government news.

18. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members


Details:

1. ‘SKIL’ Bill Introduced in House; Would Benefit Employment-Based Immigration

The House of Representatives’ version of the ‘SKIL’ (Securing Knowledge Innovation and Leadership) bill was introduced by Rep. John Shadegg (R-Ariz.) on June 29, 2006. Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) introduced the SKIL bill (S. 2691) in the Senate in early May. Among other things, the SKIL bill would increase the annual H-1B cap from 65,000 to 115,000, and exempt certain professionals from the H-1B and immigrant visa caps. The bill also would raise the latter cap from 140,000 to 290,000. A pre-certification program would be created for employers filing multiple applications with no history of abuse. Pre-certification would allow such employers to file their applications on a separate, more streamlined, track. The bill also would increase the time period allowed for foreign students’ post-curricular optional practical training from 12 months to 24 months.
Back to Top


2. USCIS Announces Filing Location Change for Employment-Based Adjustments

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on June 30, 2006, changes to the filing location for employment-based applications for lawful permanent resident status. Starting on July 24, 2006, all applicants filing an Application to Adjust Status or Register Permanent Residence (Form I-485) based on a pending or approved Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker (Form I-140), also referred to as a “standalone filing,” should mail that form directly to the Nebraska Service Center. Applicants should send accompanying forms (e.g., the Application for Travel Document (Form I-131) and/or the Application for Employment Authorization (Form I-765)) to the same location.

USCIS said the change marks the second phase of “Bi-Specialization,” a USCIS initiative to implement centralized filing and bi-specialized adjudications. USCIS is aligning similar workloads between two “sister” service centers. Starting on July 24, the Nebraska Service Center/Texas Service Center pairing will process all employment-based adjustment of status applications (and related applications). Although the Nebraska Service Center will serve as the centralized filing location, some petitioners and applicants will receive a filing receipt from the Texas Service Center, if the case is handled by that center. The center that generates the I-485 receipt notice will be the center that actually adjudicates the case, USCIS noted.

USCIS said it will not reject any standalone I-485s sent to an incorrect service center upon implementation of the amended filing instructions that go into effect on July 24. Instead, USCIS will accept the filing, direct it to the correct location, and honor the initial receipt date. The July 24 change establishing the new filing location does not affect other aspects of the form instructions; USCIS will continue honoring earlier versions of the I-485.

The USCIS news release announcing the change is at: http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/publicaffairs/newsrels/BiSpec_063006PR.pdf.

Back to Top


3. DHS Issues Proposed Rule on SSN Matches, ‘Safe Harbor’ Verification Procedures

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), under the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), proposed on June 14, 2006, to amend regulations relating to the unlawful hiring or continued employment of unauthorized aliens. The amended regulation describes the legal obligations of an employer when the employer receives a no-match letter from the Social Security Administration (SSA) or the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). It also describes “safe-harbor” procedures that the employer can follow in response to such a letter and thereby “be certain that DHS will not find that the employer had constructive knowledge that the employee referred to in the letter was an alien not authorized to work in the United States.”

The proposed rule adds to the current regulation’s definition of “knowing” two more examples of situations that may lead to a finding that an employer had such constructive knowledge. These additional examples involve an employer’s failure to take reasonable steps in response to either of two events: (1) The employer receives written notice from the SSA that the combination of name and social security account number submitted to the SSA for an employee does not match agency records; or (2) the employer receives written notice from the DHS that the immigration status documentation or employment authorization documentation presented or referenced by the employee in completing the I-9 form was not assigned to the employee according to DHS records.

The proposed rule also states that whether the DHS will actually find that an employer had constructive knowledge that an employee was an “unauthorized alien” in a situation described in any of the regulation’s examples “will depend on the totality of relevant circumstances.” The “safe-harbor” procedures include attempting to resolve the no-match and, if it cannot be resolved within a certain period of time, verifying again the employee’s identity and employment authorization through a specified process.

The regulation would not preclude the DHS from finding that an employer had actual knowledge that an employee was unauthorized. An employer with actual knowledge that one of its employees is unauthorized could not avoid liability by following the procedures described in the proposed regulation. The burden of proving actual knowledge, however, would be on the government, the proposed rule notes. Also, the resolution of discrepancies in a no-match letter, or other information that an employee’s Social Security number presented to an employer matches the records for the employee held by the SSA, “does not, in and of itself, demonstrate that the employee is authorized to work in the United States.”

Written comments may be submitted in accordance with the procedures outlined in the proposed rule’s summary by August 14, 2006. ICE is particularly interested in comments on the time limits described in the proposed rule, which is available at: http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/E6-9303.pdf.

Back to Top


4. ICE Issues Interim Rule on Retaining I-9s Electronically

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) issued an interim rule on June 15, 2006, that provides that employers and recruiters or referrers for a fee who are required to complete and retain an I-9 form (Employment Eligibility Verification) for each employee may sign and retain these forms electronically.

The interim rule implements statutory changes to the I-9 retention requirements by establishing standards for electronic signatures and the electronic scanning and retention of the I-9. The interim rule’s supplementary information notes that these standards closely follow widely accepted electronic storage standards and requirements previously published in Internal Revenue Service regulations. ICE said that reducing any potential burden on the business community by the adoption of existing standards already in wide use was a critical consideration.

There are still many open issues about the best practices for electronic signature and storage of I-9s. Employers are encouraged to comment on the interim rule after consulting with their IT departments and immigration counsel.

Written comments may be submitted by August 14, 2006, via the procedures outlined in the interim rule’s summary. The full text of the interim rule is available at: http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/E6-9283.pdf.

Back to Top


5. State Department Issues Notice on New Passport Requirements

The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 requires that by January 1, 2008, travelers to and from the Caribbean, Bermuda, Panama, Mexico, and Canada have a passport or other secure, accepted document to enter or re-enter the United States. The Department of State is proposing to implement the requirement in phases following a proposed timeline.

In the proposed implementation plan, which will be subject to a period of public comment, the requirement will be applied to all air and sea travel to or from Canada, Mexico, Central and South America, the Caribbean, and Bermuda on December 31, 2006. The requirement will be extended to all land border crossings on December 31, 2007.

The Department noted that this is a change from previous travel requirements and will affect all U.S. citizens entering the U.S. from countries within the Western Hemisphere who do not currently possess valid passports. This new requirement will also affect certain foreign nationals who currently are not required to present a passport to travel to the U.S. Most Canadian citizens, citizens of the British Overseas Territory of Bermuda and, to a lesser degree, Mexican citizens will be affected by this requirement.

Back to Top


6. No Action Yet in Congress on Comprehensive Immigration Reform Bills, But States Aren’t Waiting; Hearings Planned

Although the Senate and House of Representatives have been unable to resolve their differences on comprehensive immigration reform legislation so far this session, various members of Congress and others are calling for more hearings on immigration issues, many focusing on enforcement, to be held this summer both in Washington, D.C., and around the country.

The House Education and Workforce Committee, for example, plans a “field” hearing some time in mid-July (the date and location have not yet been decided) focusing on English as the official language of the U.S. and on the effect of enforcement of immigration laws on U.S. workers. On the Senate side, Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) plans a hearing in Pennsylvania on July 5 on the topic of foreign guestworkers.

Meanwhile, several states have jumped into the fray. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, at least 30 states this year have considered over 75 bills targeting employers of unauthorized foreign workers. Among others, Colorado has directed its own Department of Labor and Employment to investigate contractors performing work for the Colorado state government that violate federal laws against hiring unauthorized workers. Pennsylvania state lawmakers are considering legislation to toughen penalties for employers statewide that hire unauthorized workers, and already have increased penalties for such employers who receive government grants or loans. Georgia and Massachusetts have begun requiring public employers to verify that no unauthorized workers have been hired. Many such efforts are largely symbolic, however, because of federal laws and penalties already on the books against hiring unauthorized workers.

Regardless of what happens this summer around the country, prospects for passage of a comprehensive immigration reform bill in Congress appear increasingly dim, although the Bush administration and others are still pushing for one. House Speaker Dennis Hastert said, “We want to make sure the Congress gets this done the right way and not be rushed just because it’s an election year.” Stay tuned.

Back to Top


7. Senate Holds Hearing on Work Authorization Verification Enforcement

The Senate’s Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Citizenship held a hearing on June 19, 2006, on “Immigration Enforcement at the Workplace: Learning from the Mistakes of 1986.”

Stewart Baker, Assistant Secretary for Policy Development under the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), noted in his testimony that the Bush administration is proposing a comprehensive overhaul of the employment authorization verification and employer sanctions programs as part of immigration reform. “We are proposing this now, because it is clear that the system set up in the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) didn’t work,” Mr. Baker said. IRCA “created a brisk trade in fake IDs,” Mr. Baker said, and employers had no way to verify documentation. The Basic Pilot work authorization verification program has been limited and voluntary thus far, and penalties for violations are low, he noted. Other obstacles, Mr. Baker said, include a lack of effective information-sharing and a failure to “follow the fraud” when new schemes evolve.

Mr. Baker said the administration is proposing: (1) a mandatory electronic employment verification system (EEVS) for employers that will ensure that businesses have a “clear and reliable” way to check work documents, including social security numbers, (2) allowing the Social Security Administration to share no-match data with the DHS to permit the latter to better focus enforcement efforts, (3) ensuring that all legal foreign workers have a secure employment authorization card that will reduce the ability of such workers to engage in document fraud, and (4) stiffening the penalties for employers who violate these laws.

The U.S. needs the ability “to set clear, reasonable standards of good conduct for employers,” Mr. Baker said, to include asking them to review employee documents using the electronic verification system and retain all documents relevant to their employees’ eligibility to work. Employers who are shown to have hired a significant number of unlawful workers in a year “should face a presumption that they have knowingly hired these individuals,” Mr. Baker said. “We also need to tighten the rules to ensure that employers cannot use contract arrangements to ‘wall themselves off’ from complicity in the illegal hiring of their contractors.”

While acknowledging that most of the administration’s proposals involve improvements to the existing employment verification and sanctions system, Mr. Baker said the President has proposed two major new improvements: the mandatory electronic verification system and sharing of no-match Social Security data with the DHS. “Sufficient access to no-match data would provide important direction to [U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement] investigators to target their enforcement actions toward those employers who have a disproportionate number of these no-matches, who have reported earnings for multiple employees on the same number and who are therefore more likely to be engaging in unlawful behavior,” he said.

Cecilia Munoz, Vice President for Research, Advocacy, and Legislation at the National Council of La Raza, expressed concerns that advancing an employer verification system could “jeopardize a substantial portion of the U.S. workforce” because data inaccuracies will cast doubt on some workers’ ability to do their jobs lawfully, “while others will likely be the victims of ‘defensive hiring,’ that is, employment practices [that] weed out people perceived as immigrants, or whose ethnicity suggests that they might be in the category of workers for whom verification is time-consuming and costly because the databases are fraught with errors.” She said La Raza supports devising a system that can allow employers to verify workers’ authorization swiftly while protecting them against dismissal or discrimination because of bias, ignorance, or faulty data. “The creation of [an electronic verification] system without addressing the fundamental flaws in the current program is unadvisable and will result in severe negative consequences for immigrant and U.S. workers on a much larger scale than they currently experience,” Ms. Munoz warned.

C. Stewart Verdery, Jr., an Adjunct Fellow with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and formerly the DHS’s Assistant Secretary for Border and Transportation Security Policy and Planning, recommended: (1) phasing in any electronic verification system, starting with occupations most crucial to national security; (2) ensuring employee rights before termination; (3) developing biometric identification and, in the interim, implementing the REAL ID program; (4) involving the private sector in proposing and implementing innovative solutions; and (5) imposing fees to help pay the cost.

The hearing testimony is available at: http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearing.cfm?id=1949. The U.S. Government Accountability Office’s testimony, Immigration Enforcement: Weaknesses Hinder Employment Verification and Worksite Enforcement Efforts, is available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06895t.pdf.

Back to Top


8. USCIS Releases Guidance on Permanent Offers of Employment for Outstanding Professors and Researchers

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services recently released guidance on applying the definition of “permanent employment” when adjudicating first preference (EB-1) petitions filed on behalf of outstanding professors and researchers.

The guidance notes that a recent review of modern business practices reveals that most employment agreements, when entered into between the employer and potential employee, provide that a tenure-track teaching position or comparable research position is terminable “at will,” even though both the employer and employee normally expect the employment to continue for an indefinite or unlimited duration. In determining whether a petitioning employer has established that a research position is permanent, the guidance notes, some adjudicators have focused solely on whether the language of an actual employment contract, if submitted, or the offer of employment contains a “good cause for termination” provision. Evidence of such a provision is not mandated under the regulations and is not the only way by which a petitioning employer may demonstrate that an employee in a research position has “an expectation of continued employment,” the guidance notes. Some adjudicators also inadvertently have applied the definition of “permanent,” which only affects research positions, to the assessment of whether a non-research position is tenured or tenure-track.

The guidance clarifies that adjudicators should not deny a petition for a permanent research position where the employer is seeking an outstanding researcher solely because the actual employment contract or offer of employment does not contain a “good cause for termination” clause. The petitioning employer still must establish that the offer is intended to be of an indefinite or unlimited duration and that the nature of the position is such that the employee ordinarily will have an expectation of continued employment.

Many research positions are funded by grant money received on a yearly basis. Researchers, therefore, are employed pursuant to contracts that are valid in one-year increments. If the petitioning employer demonstrates the intent to continue to seek funding and a reasonable expectation that funding will continue, such as demonstrated previous renewals for extended long-term research projects, such employment can be considered “permanent” within the meaning of the regulations, the guidance states. Adjudicators also should consider the circumstances and benefits surrounding the job offer.

Determinations of whether a position qualifies as a tenured or tenure-track position are not linked to the regulatory requirement that the position be “permanent,” which applies only to research positions, the guidance notes. As such, adjudicators do not need to evaluate whether the employment contract for a tenured or tenure-track position has a “good cause for termination” clause “and should not deny a petition seeking an outstanding professor for [such a] position on that basis alone.” Adjudicators, however, should continue to evaluate whether the overall nature of the position is tenured or tenure-track.

The full text of the guidance is available at: http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/lawsregs/handbook/EB1Visa060606.pdf.

Back to Top


9. USCIS Releases New Guidance on H-1B Cap Exemptions

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently released new guidance for adjudicators on: (1) how determinations should be made with respect to the exemption from the H-1B cap for those who have earned a master’s or higher degree from a U.S. institution, and (2) eligibility for exemptions based on the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act of 2000 (AC21).

The guidance on master’s or higher degrees states that, when reviewing a petition involving a potential cap case, adjudicators should first determine if there is another basis to exempt the beneficiary from the H-1B cap. Then, in determining whether a U.S.-issued degree is a master’s degree, adjudicators “should consider more than the simple nomenclature of a degree.” To qualify as a master’s degree for purposes of meeting the cap exemption requirement, the guidance states, the degree must be one for which a bachelor’s degree in any field is required as a prerequisite. This ensures that the master’s degree is at least one level higher than a bachelor’s degree, the essential component of the “master’s or higher” degree requirement.

USCIS provided several examples of why degrees should not be adjudicated at face value. In the chiropractic field, the guidance notes, the entry-level degree is “Doctor of Chiropractic,” and a bachelor’s degree in any field is not a prerequisite. On the other hand, attorneys typically hold a “juris doctor” degree and medical doctors hold a “doctor of medicine degree.” Although neither degree is equivalent to a Ph.D., “a J.D. or M.D. would be considered to be equivalent to, if not higher than, a master’s degree,” the notice states.

To obtain the H-1B cap exemption for a U.S. master’s degree or higher, the guidance notes, the requirements of both a qualifying master’s or higher degree, and issuance of the degree from a U.S. institution of higher education, must be met. The guidance also outlines what the term “institution of higher education” means for purposes of the H-1B cap exemption.

The guidance on master’s or higher degrees, sent to the field on May 2, 2006, is available at: http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/lawsregs/handbook/AC21_050206.pdf.

USCIS also released guidance regarding eligibility under AC21 for an H-1B cap exemption based on employment or an offer of employment at an institution of higher education, a related or affiliated nonprofit entity, a nonprofit research organization, or a governmental research organization. The lengthy guidance notes that a number of questions have been raised and clarifies how USCIS will interpret these terms, including for third-party petitioners, when adjudicating H-1B petitions requesting exemptions to the cap.

Noting that the exemption allowed for those who are employed “at” a qualifying institution is a broader category than would be the case for those employed “by” a qualifying institution, USCIS states that it will allow third-party petitioners to claim exemption if the beneficiary will perform job duties “that directly and predominately further the normal, primary, or essential purpose, mission, objectives or function of the qualifying institution, namely, higher education or nonprofit or governmental research.” The guidance notes that if a petitioner is not itself a qualifying institution, the petitioner bears the burden of establishing that there is a logical nexus between the two. In many instances, the guidance notes, third-party petitioners seeking exemptions are companies that have contracts with qualifying federal agencies or other institutions that require the placement of professionals on-site at the agency. The H-1B employees generally perform work directly related to the purposes of the qualifying federal agency or entity and thus may qualify for an exemption to the H-1B cap. Qualifying third-party employment can occur in a variety of other ways; the guidance provides a non-exhaustive list of examples.

The AC21 guidance, sent to the field on June 6, 2006, is available at http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/lawsregs/handbook/AC21C060606.pdf.

Back to Top


10. State Dept. Instructs on How Consular Officers Determine Whether a Student Visa Applicant is Qualified

At the onset of the busy student visa season, the Department of State has released information on how its consular officers will be making decisions about whether student visa applicants are qualified. A cable sent to the field on May 31, 2006, notes that consular officers should focus on several areas:

(1) Student visa applicants must demonstrate that they are academically qualified to pursue their intended course of study and are financially able to cover its costs. Consular officers are instructed to “focus on the applicant’s immediate and near-term intent, remembering that by nature foreign students stay in the United States for extended periods of time.”

(2) Additionally, the cable notes, consular officers should “remember to focus on the student and not the institution during adjudication.” Student visa applicants should be afforded the opportunity to demonstrate why their choice of institution is right for them and that they will be able to maintain status as a student at that school. “Consular officers should not second-guess an individual’s choice of school, or deny a visa based solely on the student’s choice of a particular academic institution.” Posts should, however, bring to the Department’s attention institutions they believe are improperly issuing I-20s.

(3) Recent guidance extended the period during which student visas may be issued to 120 days before the program start date. In instances where students can anticipate delays in issuance, including delays resulting from security advisory opinion (SAO) requirements, posts may accept applications for adjudication and processing even before this 120-day period, the cable states, but may not issue the actual visa until 120 days before the start of studies. Although SAO delays for students have declined significantly over the last two years, a small number of cases continue to face extended review, the cable notes.

(4) The State Department’s Bureau of Consular Affairs supports the efforts of posts to make visa interviews available to students on a priority basis and posts should continue, as necessary, to expedite student and exchange visitor visa applications. “Efficient processing of visas for students and exchange visitors is a high priority for the Department: every student should have the chance to make the initial start date of his/her academic or exchange program whenever possible,” the cable notes.

The full text of the cable is available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/laws/telegrams/telegrams_2926.html.

Back to Top


11. TPS Extended for Salvadorans

The designation for El Salvador of temporary protected status (TPS) was set to expire on September 9, 2006. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on June 15, 2006, that TPS for El Salvador has been extended for 12 months, until September 9, 2007. The notice provides details on re-registration procedures and information on late initial registration. Given the large number of Salvadorans affected by the extension, USCIS said it recognizes that many re-registrants may not receive an extension sticker or new employment authorization document (EAD) until after their current EADs expire on September 9, 2006. Accordingly, the notice automatically extends the validity of EADs issued under the TPS designation of El Salvador for 6 months until March 9, 2007, and explains how TPS beneficiaries and their employers may determine which EADs are extended automatically.

The 60-day re-registration period begins on July 3, 2006, and will remain in effect until September 1, 2006. Applicants are strongly encouraged to file as soon as possible after the start of the re-registration period. The full text of the notice is available at: http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/06-5443.pdf.

Back to Top


12. GAO Finds Labor Dept’s Oversight of H-1B Program Lacking; House Holds Hearing

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) has found that reviews by the Department of Labor (DOL) of H-1B applications are timely but lack quality assurance controls and may overlook some inaccuracies.

The report notes that from January 2002 through September 2005, the DOL electronically reviewed more than 960,000 such applications and certified almost all of them. About one-third of the applications were for computer systems analysis workers and programming occupations. The GAO’s analysis of the DOL’s data found certified applications with inaccurate information that could have been identified by more stringent checks.

The GAO found 3,229 applications that were certified even though the wage rate on the application was lower than the prevailing wage for that occupation. Additionally, approximately 1,000 certified applications contained erroneous employer identification numbers, which the GAO said raised questions about the validity of the applications.

From fiscal year 2000 through FY 2005, the GAO noted, the DOL’s Wage and Hour Division (WHD) reported an increase in the number of H-1B complaints and violations, and a corresponding increase in the number of employer penalties. In FY 2000, the DOL required employers to pay back wages totaling $1.2 million to 226 H-1B workers; by FY 2005, back wage penalties had increased to $5.2 million for 604 workers. “Program changes, such as a higher visa cap in some years, could have been a contributing factor,” the GAO said.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) reviews the DOL’s certified applications but cannot easily verify whether employers submitted petitions from more workers than originally requested because U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service’s database cannot easily match each petition to the DOL’s application case number, the GAO noted. Also, while reviewing petitions, DHS staff may find evidence that employers are not meeting their H-1B obligations and may deny a petition if an employer is unable to explain a discrepancy, but the agency does not have a formal process for reporting such discrepancies to the DOL. Also, current law precludes the WHD from using this information to initiate an investigation of the employer, and the GAO found other information-sharing difficulties.

The GAO recommends that Congress consider eliminating the restriction on the DOL that prevents it from using information from the DHS to initiate an investigation, and directing the DHS and DOL to share information on employers that may not be fulfilling program requirements. The GAO also recommends that the DOL improve its checks of employers’ applications and that USCIS include the DOL’s application case number in its new information technology system.

The GAO noted that the DHS agreed with its recommendations, but the DOL questioned whether more stringent checks were needed and believes Congress intentionally limited the DOL’s role and placed program integrity with USCIS. “We believe there are cost-effective methods that Labor could use to check the applications more stringently that would enhance the integrity of the H-1B process,” the GAO concluded.

The House of Representatives’ Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims held a hearing on this topic on June 22, 2006. Committee chairman F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr.’s news advisory is available at http://judiciary.house.gov/media/pdfs/h1blabor62106.pdf. Testimony is posted at http://judiciary.house.gov/oversight.aspx?ID=247. There is a video link to the full hearing on the same Web page.

The full text of the GAO’s report, H-1B Visa Program: Labor Could Improve Its Oversight and Increase Information Sharing with Homeland Security, is available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06720.pdf.

Back to Top


13. State Dept. Reports on Visa Number Usage, Availability

A Department of State representative has reported that China’s EB-1 category became current in July because demand was less than projected. 1,700 Chinese EB-1 numbers have been used; 2,800 are available for the fiscal year. Overall, China has used 5,600 employment-based numbers with 9,800 available for the year. It is likely that China will not hit the limit overall. Previously U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) was clearing out its backlog of employment-based immigrant visa petitions, causing delays. Demand is now lower because approvals seem to have stabilized, the representative noted. EB-1 China numbers should continue to be available, although there is no guarantee, because the backlogs encountered recently resulted from an apparent surge in processing by USCIS.

Further, the representative noted, 37,000 of the 50,000 Schedule A numbers have been allocated. Current usage is 2,700 to 2,800 per month, so a supply should remain available through October or November of 2006. The Department will not allocate a case to Schedule A if an EB-2 or EB-3 number is available for the individual based on the petition.

Meanwhile, the representative noted, recent pessimistic comments about future availability of visa numbers were directed at family-based, not employment-based, numbers. Readers should not assume visa availability, however, until the cut-off dates are announced. Current visa number availability information is at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_2943.html.

Back to Top


14. State Dept. Issues Final Rule on Review of Nonimmigrant Visa Issuances, Refusals

The Department of State issued a final rule, effective June 30, 2006, expanding guidance on its review of nonimmigrant visa issuances and refusals to specify who should conduct the reviews, the types of cases to be reviewed, and the goals of the reviews. The final rule focuses on an increase in reviews of visa issuances to enhance border security. The Department said the purpose of the revision is to expand the scope of reviews to ensure that supervisors are reviewing both issuances and refusals to the greatest extent practicable, while balancing workload considerations at consular posts.

The Department noted that the Foreign Affairs Manual calls for a spot-check of nonimmigrant visa issuances. The rule revision provides a regulatory framework for a “regular and targeted” review of issuances and refusals. Because of the need to formalize the reviews of visa issuances beyond spot-checks, the Department said it will no longer be possible to review all visa refusals. Department regulations specify that a refusal must be reviewed without delay; that is, on the day of the refusal or as soon as is administratively possible. The final rule specifies that this will also apply to reviews of issuances.

The full text of the final rule is available at: http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/E6-10270.pdf.

Back to Top


15. USCIS Ombudsman Lists ‘Pervasive and Serious Problems’

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Ombudsman, Prakash Khatri, issued an annual report to the Senate and House of Representatives Judiciary Committees on June 29, 2006. The report lists “pervasive and serious problems” at USCIS, including, among others, backlogs and prolonged processing times, untimely processing and systemic problems with employment-based “green card” applications, limited availability of case status information, misdirected or unrecorded green cards, and delays caused by name checks and other security checks. The report includes 13 recommendations to the USCIS director.

The full text of the report is available at: http://www.dhs.gov/interweb/assetlibrary/CISOmbudsman_AnnualReport_2006.pdf.

Back to Top


16. Sign-On Letter Supports Immigration

Over 500 economists have signed on to the Open Institute’s June 19, 2006, “Open Letter on Immigration,” which notes the economic benefits to the U.S. of immigration. The letter, including the extensive list of signers, is at: http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=1727.
Back to Top


17. Google Launches New Government Information Search

Google U.S. Government Search provides a single location for searching across U.S. government information and keeping updated on government news. Users can choose to search for content located on either U.S. federal, state, and local government Web sites or the entire Web, from the same search box. Below the search box, the home page includes government-specific news content from both government agencies and press outlets. The page can be personalized by adding content feeds on government or other topics of interest.

The new Google government search is available at: http://www.google.com/help/about_usgovernmentsearch.html. At the bottom of the page, click on “About Google U.S. Government Search” for frequently asked questions about how to use the search.

Back to Top


18. Recent News from ABIL Members

ABIL members spoke and served on several panels at the American Immigration Lawyers Association’s annual conference, held this year in San Antonio, Texas, on June 21-24, 2006. Approximately 3,000 people attended the conference. ABIL members and topics they discussed included:

Edward R. Litwin: “Labor Certification-Based Immigration: Pre-Filing.”

Bernard P. Wolfsdorf: “Consular Processing — Part of the Admission Equation.”

Laura J. Danielson, Cyrus D. Mehta, Angelo A. Paparelli, and Stephen Yale-Loehr: “An Embarrassment of Riches: Immigration Lawyering in a 21st Century ‘Flat’ World.”

Cyrus D. Mehta: “Adjustment of Status vs. Consular Processing: Should I Stay or Should I Go?”

Charles H. Kuck: “Litigation for Business Immigration Lawyers” and “Expansion of Expedited Removal: Implementing USCIRF’s Recommendations.”

H. Ronald Klasko and Steven A. Clark: “PERM Workshop.”

Tapes of the conference presentations are available for purchase at: https://www.csctapes.com/tapes/aila2006.htm.

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2006-07-01 00:00:582019-09-19 01:10:55News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 2, No. 7 • July 01, 2006
Page 34 of 35«‹32333435›

Archive

  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • August 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • February 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006

ABIL is a corporation with over 40 top-rated immigration law firms and 1,500+ professionals.

News

  • ABIL Immigration Insider • November 2, 2025
  • ABIL Immigration Insider • October 5, 2025
  • ABIL Global Update • October 2025
  • ABIL Immigration Insider • September 7, 2025

Sign Up for our Newsletters

Sign up for our Immigration Insider & Global Updates Newsletters

Select list(s) to subscribe to


By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: . You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact
© Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers (ABIL) All Rights Reserved 2025
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Home
  • About
  • ABIL Lawyers
  • Global Immigration
  • Services
  • Industries
  • Resources
  • Contact
Scroll to top