ABIL Global Update • December 2023

Headlines:

1. RED FLAGS IN EMPLOYMENT LAW RELATED TO IMMIGRATION: AN OVERVIEW – This article provides an update on red flags in employment law related to immigration in several countries.

2. ITALY – On November 13, 2023, the European Union (EU) Council adopted new rules to allow online filing of Schengen visa applications. Also, a measure has been introduced under which some non-EU citizens can pay a fee to register for the Italian National Health Service. In other news, the Philippine consulate is cautioning Filipinos against falling victim to illegal recruitment schemes targeting Italy.

3. RUSSIA – The Russian government has changed the migration registration rules.

4. SPAIN – Spain has partially implemented European Union (EU) Directive 2021/1883 concerning the conditions of entry and residence for highly qualified employment of third-country nationals.

5. UNITED KINGDOM – As expected, UK Visas and Immigration fees increased on October 4, 2023.

New Publications and Items of Interest – New Publications and Items of Interest

ABIL Member / Firm News – ABIL Member / Firm News

Download:

ABIL Global Immigration Update – December 2023

Details:

1. RED FLAGS IN EMPLOYMENT LAW RELATED TO IMMIGRATION: AN OVERVIEW

Italy

To apply for a work permit for a foreign national, a company must be legally registered in Italy. It is possible to use a professional employer organization/employer of record (PEO/EOR) company under certain conditions:

1. The PEO/EOR company must be registered in Italy as a branch or subsidiary (it cannot use a company registered in another European Union (EU) country);

1. The PEO/EOR company must be authorized by the Italian Labor Agency and have a license as Agenzia per il Lavoro; and
2. There must a contract signed between the PEO/EOR and the final customer (the company where the worker will be assigned to work) (in accordance with article 30, law Decree n. 81/2015). Companies can hire workers as “temporary agents” only if they execute a contract with the company where the worker is assigned to work.

When intending to hire a foreign worker, the employer must always make sure the foreign worker holds a permit type that allows him or her to work. There are no formal, government-mandated procedures or systems for verifying an employee’s right to work in Italy. The employer must verify independently that the person holds a visa/permit with the required permission to work.

Entry into the country for work purposes (either as subordinate employed or self-employed job) is subject to the specific quotas released by the government for the intake of foreign workers. An exception to the quota system is for certain categories of workers (e.g., highly skilled workers). Two cases are possible when an Italian employer is willing to hire a foreign worker:

1. The non-EU candidate already resides in Italy. In that case, it is the employer’s duty to check that the worker has a permit that allows work (e.g., permit for work, permit for family reasons); or
2. The non-EU candidate resides outside Italy. In that case, when quotas are available or anytime in case of a quota-exempt category of worker, the Italian employer must obtain a work permit clearance from the immigration authorities (average three-month processing time) for the employee to be eligible to apply for a work visa at the Italian consulate in his or her country of residence, enter Italy, and complete the in-country immigration procedures. The Italian employer is authorized to hire the worker only after the worker has obtained the work permit and visa and arrived in Italy. The employee can therefore be hired while the residence permit application is pending or, in the context of a renewal, during the renewal process, provided the application has been filed within 60 days after the permit expiration date and the foreign worker has the renewal receipt.

Netherlands

The intersection of employment law and immigration law in the Netherlands is critical for employers to navigate. As in most jurisdictions, employers play a central role in obtaining and supporting work-related visas for their foreign workers. In addition, most work visas issued are for highly skilled workers, which can only be obtained if the employer is a recognized sponsor that has stricter obligations than other sponsors. There is high scrutiny of labor conditions and salary thresholds.

Red flags include:

1. Awareness of exemptions. Non-European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA)/Swiss employees need work authorization. Note that the United Kingdom is no longer a member of the EU or the EEA.
2. Inadequate verification of resident status: Employers should verify the resident status of foreign employees. Without exception, they must identify the employee on the work site and with the original residence card or (in the case of EU/EEA/Swiss) passport. They must make a photocopy of this document and keep it in their personnel files for five years after the employee has stopped working for the company.
3. Non-compliance with minimum salary requirements. In particular, highly skilled migrant (HSM) permits are subject to strict minimum salary requirements. Employers must continue to meet these requirements to comply with immigration laws. Non-compliance can lead to penalties and can affect the validity of the employee’s permit. In practice, companies in the Netherlands often seem to be more concerned about the potential revocation of their employee’s residence permit than about the financial penalties, which are not excessively high for what qualifies as administrative infractions, not criminal offenses.
4. Lack of reporting to immigration authorities. Employers must report relevant changes in the employment status of foreign workers to the immigration authority, Immigratie en Naturalisatiedienst (IND). Failure to fulfill reporting obligations can result in penalties.
5. Inadequate management of permit renewal. Employers should systematically monitor the expiration dates of residence permits and initiate the renewal process in a timely manner to avoid interruptions in employment. No less important, salary thresholds change every year. When a permit is renewed, the salary must meet the current threshold amount. A renewal can therefore lead to the necessity of meeting a higher salary threshold than the employee would otherwise have been awarded.
6. Amendment of salary due to leave situations. In case of sick leave, employers in the Netherlands must continue making salary payments for a maximum of 24 months before being allowed to terminate the employment contract. The minimum percentage of the employee’s salary that must be paid is 70 percent of the regular salary. In practice, some employers pay the full salary; others stipulate a decrease in the employment contract. If the decrease is 70 percent, for example, this could make the salary drop below the applicable threshold. In case of short, temporary sick leave, the HSM permit cannot be revoked; in case of long-term sickness, the permit can be revoked. The IND does not clearly distinguish between short- and long-term sick leave. Unpaid leave is even more problematic. Only unpaid parental leave is allowed.
7. Incomplete or inaccurate documentation. Proper recordkeeping of foreign employees’ documents and status is one of the obligations of employers, particularly in the case of recognized sponsors. Incomplete or inaccurate completion of immigration-related paperwork, such as for residence permits or work permits, can lead to sanctions.
8. Foreign employees on a partner visa. Employers may have foreign employees for whom they are not the sponsor; dependent visas in general include full work authorization in the Netherlands. If the employee’s relationship ends, the visa may be revoked. It is therefore advisable to check with the employee on a regular basis to ascertain whether their permit is still valid and/or agree with the employee that the employer is granted power of attorney to check the employee’s status with the IND.

More generally, employers in the Netherlands should seek legal advice to ensure they are aware of and compliant with the latest immigration laws and employment regulations. Immigration laws can be complex and subject to change, so staying informed and proactive is crucial for avoiding legal issues.

Turkey

Turkey’s immigration procedures are very entwined with local employment law, as is the case in most countries. Issues related to employment law, social security law, and tax must be considered by the Turkish employer sponsoring the work permit.

To start, the Turkish sponsoring company will be considered as the employer of the foreigner regardless of whether the person is “posted” to Turkey from a company outside Turkey while remaining on the foreign payroll and therefore “employed” abroad. This means that a fully executed Turkish employment agreement between the employee and the Turkish entity sponsor must be filed. Proof of an employment agreement with the sending company abroad or an offer letter will not suffice.

The terms and conditions of employment in Turkey apply to a work permit holder, including the employer’s provision of social security and health insurance contributions, and the employer’s restrictions on termination according to Turkish employment law. Also, data privacy for foreigners on work permits must be protected by the sponsoring employer according to Turkey’s Data Protection Law (which is quite similar to the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulations).

Additionally, as the work permit is adjudicated by a directorate under the Ministry of Labor (MoL), any non-compliance perceived during the work permit filing/renewal process or observed in an MoL inspection, will be forwarded to the appropriate directorate within the MoL, such as Social Security, Employee Health and Safety, or National Health Care, as applicable.

Back to Top

2. ITALY

On November 13, 2023, the European Union (EU) Council adopted new rules to allow online filing of Schengen visa applications. Also, a measure has been introduced under which some non-EU citizens can pay a fee to register for the Italian National Health Service. In other news, the Philippine consulate is cautioning Filipinos against falling victim to illegal recruitment schemes targeting Italy.

New Rules for Online Filing of Schengen Visa Applications

The new rules for online filing of Schengen visa applications (two regulations) will be published in the Official Gazette of the EU and will enter into force on the twentieth day after publication. The date on which the new rules will enter into force depends on when technical work on the visa platform and the digital visa has been concluded.

The two regulations:

• Establish an EU visa application platform, where, with some exceptions, Schengen visa applications will be submitted. Through this platform, applicants can input all relevant information, upload electronic copies of their travel documents and supporting materials, and complete their visa fee payments.
• Eliminate the need for physical visits to the consulate in most cases. Generally, in-person appearances will only be required for first-time applicants, individuals with expired biometric data, and those holding a new travel document.
• Substitute the existing visa sticker with a cryptographically signed barcode for enhanced security.

EU Blue Card: New Rules for Highly Qualified Workers

On October 16, 2023, the Italian Council of Ministers approved a legislative decree implementing Directive (EU) 2021/1883 and introducing new rules on the entry and residence of highly qualified foreign workers (EU Blue Card) approved by the government. The new rules are expected to simplify entry and residence conditions, guarantee more flexibility, and facilitate family reunification. The decree will enter into force after publication in the Official Gazette.

Healthcare Measure Introduced

The Italian Government has approved a draft budget law for 2024 that introduces a measure by which some non-EU citizens will have the option to register for the Italian National Health Service (NHS) by paying an annual contribution of 2,000 euros.

The Ministry of Health clarified that this rule applies to specific categories of non-EU citizens who are not entitled to compulsory registration with the Italian NHS. The categories include students and au pairs staying in Italy for less than three months, individuals with a residence permit for elective residence, religious personnel, diplomatic and consular staff, non-EU seconded employees of companies, foreigners participating in volunteer programs, and parents over the age of 65 for family reunification.

The rule does not affect those who are already compulsorily registered with the NHS, such as individuals with various types of residence permits, unaccompanied foreign minors, and individuals awaiting the issuance of their first residence permits.

Warning About Illegal Recruitment Schemes

In response to an announcement by the Italian government about the admission of 452,000 foreign nationals for employment over the next three years, the Philippine consulate is cautioning Filipinos against falling victim to illegal recruitment schemes targeting Italy.

Philippine Consul General Elmer Cato, based in Milan, has issued an advisory urging Filipinos to exercise caution due to the potential for unscrupulous individuals to exploit the Italian government’s announcement. The consulate’s warning comes after the Department of Migrant Workers revealed that more than 200 Overseas Filipino Workers allegedly became victims of two Milan-based companies.

Initial reports indicate that the modus operandi of these agencies involves targeting Filipinos in Italy and offering jobs in Europe to their unemployed relatives in the Philippines. However, victims are allegedly coerced into paying significant processing fees.

The Consul emphasized the consulate’s commitment to preventing further victimization, stating, “We do not want any more of our compatriots to fall prey to the predatory practices of certain individuals and agencies here in Milan who may exploit this announcement to defraud others.” The consulate has been actively addressing complaints from Filipinos who have paid exorbitant fees to individuals and agencies in Milan in exchange for nonexistent jobs. The Consul confirmed that investigations are underway, with efforts focused on gathering evidence, identifying witnesses, and collaborating with local authorities.

Investor Visa Program Suspended for Dual Nationals With Russian or Belarusian Citizenship

On July 14, 2023, the Italian Government re-introduced a suspension of the Italy Investor Visa Program for Russian and Belarusian citizens. According to reports, this measure has now been extended also to those Russian and/or Belarusian nationals who applied and obtained the Ministry clearance using a second citizenship.

The extension may also affect applicants who have already received the investor visa and are waiting for the issuance of their residence permit cards.

Back to Top

3. RUSSIA

The Russian government has changed the migration registration rules.

In accordance with amendments to Federal Law No. 109-FZ of July 18, 2006, “On Migration Registration of Foreign Citizens and Stateless Persons in the Russian Federation,” which entered into force on October 26, 2023, foreign citizens can submit directly to the migration authority a notification of arrival at the place of stay in the following cases:

1. The foreign national lives in premises owned by a citizen of the Russian Federation (except a hotel, rest home, medical organization, etc., and except at the address of the organization in which a person carries out work). Both parties must have a confirmed personal account on the portal gosuslugi.ru: the foreign citizen to submit a notification of his or her arrival in electronic form and for children under 18, and the owner of the residential premises to confirm consent;
2. The foreign national resides in the premises as stated in the application for a letter of invitation to the Russian Federation as the intended place of stay (in case of entry to Russia on a visa). A foreign national submits such a notification to the migration registration authority in person. This rule does not apply to cases of accommodation in a hotel, rest home, medical organization, etc., or at the address of the organization in which a person carries out work;
3. The foreign national and the receiving party conclude a residential lease agreement. A foreign national submits to the migration registration authority directly in person or in electronic form a notification of arrival at the place of stay and arrival at the same place for children under 18 years specified in the residential lease agreement.

These changes have expanded the list below according to which a foreign national can submit in person a notification of arrival at the place of stay to the Ministry of Internal Affairs:

1. If there are documents confirming reasons that prevent the receiving party from sending a notification of the arrival of a foreign national at the place of stay to the migration registration authority, this notification should be submitted according to the established regulations to the migration authority by that foreign national;
2. If a foreign national owns residential premises on the territory of Russia, he or she may, if actually living at that address, declare it as his or her place of residence. In this case, he or she would submit a notification of arrival at that place to the migration registration authority directly in person, in electronic form, or through a multifunctional center;
3. The receiving party, which is the owner of the residential premises, is located outside Russia (for example, a Russian citizen permanently residing outside the Russian Federation, a foreign citizen, a foreign legal entity). A foreign national must personally notify the migration authority of arrival at the place of stay, additionally providing notarized consent of the receiving party.

Back to Top

4. SPAIN

Spain has partially implemented European Union (EU) Directive 2021/1883 concerning the conditions of entry and residence for highly qualified employment of third-country nationals.

This implementation is being carried out through amendments to Spain’s Entrepreneurs Act 14/2013, establishing two schemes for highly qualified professionals (HQPs) within the Large Companies Unit. The most substantial features are:

National Residence Permit for Highly Qualified Professionals

This category already exists, but the permit’s requirements have been updated to include individuals with qualifications equivalent to at least level 1 of the Spanish Qualifications Framework or with professional experience of at least three years comparable to the required qualification. The labor market test does not apply.

The permit validity aligns with the employment contract duration plus an additional three months, with a maximum period of three years.

Residence Permit for Highly Qualified Professionals—EU Blue Card

This category is for third-country nationals with higher education qualifications of at least three years (equivalent to level 2 of the Spanish Qualifications Framework or level 6 of the European Qualifications Framework) or at least five years of relevant professional experience. For Information and communications technology managers and professionals, the required experience is reduced to three years within seven years before applying for an EU Blue Card. The labor market test does not apply.

The salary threshold ranges between 1.0 and 1.6 times the average gross annual salary, with a possibility of applying at 80 percent of the threshold under specific circumstances.

The permit validity aligns with the employment contract duration plus an additional three months, with a maximum period of three years.

Holders of an EU Blue Card from another Member State can stay up to 90 days in any 180-day period in Spain without authorization. To stay longer, they must apply for the EU Blue Card in Spain, with a streamlined process allowing them to start working upon application submission.

Dependents of EU Blue Card holders can apply for a residence permit in Spain unless they hold international protection status in Spain.

The implementation provides pathways for highly qualified professionals to work and reside in Spain, with adjustments made to existing permits and the introduction of the EU Blue Card system to facilitate mobility within the EU for qualified workers.

Back to Top

5. UNITED KINGDOM

As expected, UK Visas and Immigration (UKVI) fees increased on October 4, 2023.

The precise timing of the Immigration Health Surcharge (IHS) increase was unknown. It is now known from the draft legislation that the IHS will increase no sooner than January 16, 2024. Assuming both Houses of Parliament approve it, the increase will start on that date or 21 days after the legislation is passed, whichever is later.

The IHS headline rate will increase from £624 to £1,035 per year of the visa. The discounted rate (for students, Youth Mobility Scheme applicants, and under 18s) will increase from £470 to £776.

Those who have any UK visa applications in the pipeline should submit them before January 16, 2024, if possible.

Back to Top

5. New Publications and Items of Interest

Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers:

• ABIL is available on X (formerly Twitter): @ABILImmigration
• Recent ABIL member blogs are at http://www.abilblog.com/

Back to Top

ABIL Member / Firm News

Dagmar Butte and Cyrus Mehta were quoted by Forbes in Apple Settles $25 Million DOJ Immigrant Lawsuit, Regardless of PERM. Ms. Butte said, “The Apple settlement highlights the disconnect between real-world recruitment practices and the artificial nature of the mandated recruitment steps under PERM. This is especially true when you consider that most modern recruitment practices did not exist when PERM was rolled out in 2005.” She noted that even if the PERM recruitment structure is an invention of the Department of Labor, the underlying good-faith test of the labor market seems to require treating PERM positions no less favorably in the breadth of recruitment than regular positions. “I tell my clients to remember that this system was designed to protect U.S. workers, and not to facilitate hiring foreign nationals and they should view recruitment from that perspective. I also always ask them to tell me how they would recruit for the job if PERM were not a part of the process and make that part of the optional steps for professional positions.” Mr. Mehta said, “The safest course is for employers to hew as closely as possible to their non-PERM recruitment practices. Thus, while it is lawful for employers to ask applicants to send resumes only by postal mail under the PERM regulations, if the employer otherwise allows applicants to send their resumes electronically, the employer should be consistent and require applicants even responding to PERM recruitment to send their resumes electronically.” He said employers are caught between the conflicting requirements of two federal agencies.

Avi Gomberg was listed in Who’s Who Legal Canada 2023 and recognized as a Thought Leader and Global Leader for Corporate Immigration.

Charles Kuck spoke with the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and WABE News in Listen: Why Were Videos Leaked in Fulton Election Case? (available by subscription).

Mr. Kuck authored a new blog post: The Visa Apocalypse is Upon Us—Welcome to the Future.

Mr. Mehta authored a new blog post: While the Proposed H-1B Rules Have Many Positive Features, They May Also Result in Requests for Evidence and Denials.

Mr. Mehta and Kaitlyn Box co-authored several new blog posts: SpaceX’s Constitutional Challenge May Nix DOJ’s Ability to Bring Discrimination Claims Against Employers under Section 274B of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Including in the Labor Certification Context; Will the Immigration Provisions in the AI EO Bring About Meaningful Change Or Be Mere Window Dressing?; and Emerging Immigration Issues Arising from Violence in the Middle East.

Mr. Mehta and Ms. Box were cited by Forbes in SpaceX Court Win Could End DOJ Immigrant Lawsuits. The article cited their blog in explaining that “[t]he Appointments-Clause challenge by Space X, if not overturned by the Fifth Circuit or Supreme Court, could provide a pathway for other employers to fend off investigations and lawsuits by the [Immigrant and Employee Rights Section of the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division] when they conduct recruitment under the foreign labor certification program.”

Mr. Mehta and Jessica Paszko co-authored a new blog post: How Prosecutorial Discretion Saved Our Client.

Mr. Mehta was quoted by Bloomberg Law’s Daily Labor Report in Apple’s Hiring Bias Case Reveals Big Tech Foreign Worker Dilemma. He said it’s hard to know how much of an enforcement focus the PERM process will receive beyond the two tech giants. He noted, however, that a recent court victory for Elon Musk’s SpaceX may open a pathway for other companies to challenge Department of Justice (DOJ) investigations. “One wonders why Apple and Facebook copped a settlement rather than contesting the lawsuit like SpaceX did,” Mr. Mehta said.

Mr. Mehta received the Corporate Immigration Lawyer of the Year award from Who’s Who Legal (WWL) on November 9, 2023, at a ceremony in London, England. He is also a WWL Global Elite Thought Leader.

Mr. Mehta and Greg Siskind were quoted by Law360 in DHS Rule To Thwart H-1B Visa Lottery Abuse Earns Praise (available by registering). Mr. Siskind said, “I’m glad USCIS proposed this fix. It really should solve the problem and also improve, overall, the lives of both H-1B visa beneficiaries and U.S. workers, who will see their wages increase as H-1B workers have more bargaining power.” Mr. Mehta said he was concerned about an element of the proposed rule that would add language to further define what constitutes a specialty occupation. He said that provision could unfairly exclude some foreign workers with MBAs from getting H-1B visas. Under the proposed rule, he said, an MBA degree-holder offered a job in marketing or finance, for example, would need to prove that the degree was specialized in those areas. “Undoubtedly there are MBA degrees where you can show that your coursework or whatever was in finance or marketing, but I don’t see why a business administration degree has been singled out as generalized as opposed to a law degree or a medical degree,” he said.

Mr. Mehta was quoted in the Times of India in Proposed H-1B Rule: Redefining Specialty Occupation, the Employee’s Degree Must Co-Relate to the Job. Among other things, Mr. Mehta said, “There are some features in the proposed rule that will incentivize the USCIS to issue requests for evidence and potentially deny the H-1B application. A job-position will not be considered a specialty occupation for H-1B purposes if attainment of a general degree, such as business administration or liberal arts, without further specialization, is sufficient to qualify for the position.”

Angelo Paparelli authored AI to the Rescue of U.S. Immigration, published on LinkedIn.

Mr. Paparelli authored a new blog post: Tipping the Scales of Immigration Justice.

WR Immigration has published a new blog post: Time to Feast: EB-5 Visa Outlook in FY 2024.

WR Immigration will host a webinar, December Investor Visa Outlook, as part of its “Chatting With Charlie” series.

Stephen Yale-Loehr was quoted by The Guardian in Abbott Slated to Sign Law Allowing Arrest of Anyone Crossing Texas Border Without Papers. He said, “Part of the reason for passing this law is to send a message to the Biden administration that Texas is going to go as far as it dares, and they don’t care whether they lose in court, they’re making a political statement.” Mr. Yale-Loehr said that a legal challenge against the Texas law, SB4, would probably succeed, but court battles can take several years. He said he is especially concerned about the new law’s interim effect on asylum seekers.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by the New York Daily News in Hochul Says NY Will Not Give State Work Permits to Migrants: “I’m Constrained by the Law.” He said that no state has ever tried to supersede the federal government’s role as the dispenser of work papers. He noted that the approach Hochul described would have invited long-running litigation and would not have helped the state in the short-term.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by AM New York in Tales of Survival: NYC Migrants Face Bureaucratic Challenges to Gain Work Visas After a Long Journey to America. “It seems to be hit or miss as to who gets parole versus being told just to file an asylum application,” he said. He noted, among other things, that migrants are confronted with a slew of legal obstacles when trying to avoid deportation and build a life in the United States. “There are so many challenges they have. Just on the legal front, understanding the work permit complexities, depending on what status they are. Trying to find an immigration lawyer or other advocate who can help them navigate this process. While the number of applications filed by a clinic in Lower Manhattan is impressive, he said, New York City needs to be more consistent in its efforts to help migrants apply for work permits, and it needs to step up its outreach so a greater number of newcomers are aware of the legal help available to them: “We need to have more money, and train more paralegals and more lawyers to be able to do this on an ongoing basis.”

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Univision in Academics Urge Congress to Enact Specific Immigration Reforms as Soon as Possible. The article discusses a white paper, Immigration Reform: A Path Forward, which Mr. Yale-Loehr co-authored. “We designed our proposals to address three areas where we see public support and support from a bipartisan Congress. Even in a gridlocked Congress, these targeted immigration reforms can be implemented,” he said. The article is in Spanish with English translation available.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by MarketWatch in Bipartisan Calls Grow to ‘Fix’ U.S. Border Before Approving $75 Billion to Defend Israel, Ukraine. He said that there are incremental changes to immigration law that could garner bipartisan support and address the migrant situation at the border, which is being driven by relatively new trends. The article notes that Mr. Yale-Loehr helped to convene a conference earlier this year that brought together activists, business and labor leaders, and a bipartisan group of former government officials to craft a set of reforms that could appeal to both sides of the political spectrum. “Ten years ago, the majority of people who were apprehended at the border were young males traveling by themselves primarily coming for work. Now with the breakdown of various governments in Central America, Haiti, Cuba, and Venezuela, you see families coming, fleeing just desperate situations, and that has changed the dynamic of people trying to cross into the United States.” The article notes that he and his colleagues at Cornell University Law School published a recent white paper, Immigration Reform: A Path Forward, which outlines proposals including reformation of the U.S. asylum system. Mr. Yale-Loehr said that lawmakers need to recognize the “new normal” conditions at the border and adjust how the U.S. processes asylum claims, in part by reforming immigration law and creating asylum and immigration centers outside the United States at embassies and consulates so applications can be processed outside the country.

Mr. Yale-Loehr and colleagues will hold a call on Thursday, November 9, 2023, at 12 noon ET to discuss their recent white paper in which they offer three sets of interlocking proposals structured to maximize bipartisan support: (1) strengthening border security; (2) adding work visas; and (3) offering deportation protection to DREAMers. The speakers will assess the political landscape, describe their proposals, and outline why they believe the proposed reforms should—and could—be enacted. RSVP to [email protected] for dial-in details. The participant toll-free number is 800-225-9448 (primary); the participant direct/international number is 203-518-9708 (alternate); and the conference ID is CORNELL.

Mr. Yale-Loehr and colleagues’ white paper was discussed in a recent article in Forbes, Border Bill’s Immigration Demands Would Likely Doom Aid to Ukraine.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by CBS News in Trump Eyes Radical Immigration Shift If Elected in 2024, Promising Mass Deportations and Ideological Screenings. Mass deportations on the scale Trump envisions “would require a massive amount of money appropriated by Congress,” he said. Mr. Yale-Loehr also noted that such an operation would raise significant legal and humanitarian concerns. U.S. law affords immigrants in deportation proceedings due process, he noted. Many immigrants who could be deportable have U.S. citizen spouses or children, raising the specter of large-scale family separations. “It would be a significant change. But there’s only so much you can do through executive action. Many of the things he tried before were immediately tied up in litigation, and were ultimately struck down by the courts.”

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by Politico in ‘There Is No More Room in Mexico’: Mayor Adams Takes Mexico. He noted that “a single trip by a politician will not dampen the flow. Mayor Adams would do better to work cooperating with the Biden administration on this complex issue, rather than striking out on his own foreign policy pursuits.”

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by PolitiFact in Ask PolitiFact: How many people on the terrorist watchlist are coming into the United States? He said an increase in encounters with people on the terrorist watchlist “means that there is better coordination between government agencies than before. It does not necessarily mean that more terrorists are trying to enter the country.”

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by the Bangor Daily News in Why Maine’s Rush to Get Asylum Seekers Employed Won’t Work. The article notes that immigration law experts have said that the work authorization timeline for asylum seekers cannot get changed without an act of Congress, with the partisan divide between the Republican-controlled House and Democratic-led Senate meaning bills must have broad bipartisan support to pass. “Given our dysfunctional Congress these days, that is unlikely to happen,” Mr. Yale-Loehr said.

Mr. Yale-Loehr will moderate a seminar, “The Migrant Surge: What’s Different About It This Time?,” on November 7, 2023, from 12:15 p.m. to 1:15 p.m. at Cornell Law School. Mr. Yale-Loehr and Muzaffar Chishti, of the Migration Policy Institute, will discuss the history of recent migrant flows to the U.S. border, the current migrant surge at the border, its impact on cities and states beyond the border, and possible effects on federal immigration policy. Register to attend via Zoom at https://cornell.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_RwEvxopRTWOfcootUY5-qA#/registration.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by the Cornell Daily Sun in Dyson Students’ “Pathways of Belonging” Initiative Partners With Local Human Rights Office. The article discusses a panel held at Cornell on the immigration process and its effects on migrants. The article notes that during the panel discussion, Mr. Yale-Loehr introduced the idea of the broken immigration system, discussing the challenges immigrants face as they try to find a sense of belonging amid the journey toward U.S. citizenship. He highlighted the overwhelming volume of pending cases, exacerbated by a shortage of judges. Mr. Yale-Loehr said the backlog subjects many immigrants to years of waiting for crucial decisions, particularly in their pursuit of asylum, making the process exceptionally challenging.

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted by the New York Times in They Fled Climate Chaos. Asylum Law Made Decades Ago Might Not Help (available by subscription). He said, “The general public is becoming less accepting of asylum as a remedy because there are so many people being creative in applying for it. When people think of asylum, they imagine a government official pointing a gun at someone’s head. They don’t think of crop failures or sea levels rising because of climate change.”

Back to Top