• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
ABIL
  • Home
  • About
  • ABIL Lawyers
    • North America
      • Canada
      • Costa Rica
      • Mexico
      • United States
    • South America
      • Colombia
    • Europe
      • Austria
      • Belgium
      • France
      • Germany
      • Italy
      • Netherlands
      • Poland
      • Spain
      • Switzerland
      • Turkey
      • United Kingdom
    • Asia Pacific & Africa
      • Australia
      • Hong Kong
  • Global Immigration
    • North America
      • Canada
      • Costa Rica
      • Mexico
      • United States
    • South America
      • Colombia
    • Europe
      • Austria
      • Belgium
      • France
      • Germany
      • Italy
      • Netherlands
      • Poland
      • Spain
      • Switzerland
      • Turkey
      • United Kingdom
    • Asia Pacific & Africa
      • Australia
      • China
      • India
      • Japan
  • Services
    • Complex Cases
    • Compliance
    • Corporate Immigration
    • Foreign Investment
    • Global Immigration
    • Government Policy
    • Litigation
    • Pro Bono
  • Industries
  • Resources
    • Blogs
    • News
    • Newsletters
    • Videos & Recordings
    • Articles
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 4, No. 2 • February 01, 2008

February 01, 2008/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. Naturalization Processing Times Increase Drastically – The average processing time for naturalization applications has increased to approximately 18 months.

2. H-2B Cap Reached – USCIS has received a sufficient number of petitions to reach the H-2B cap for the second half of fiscal year 2008.

3. DHS Begins Collecting 10 Fingerprints at Boston Airport – DHS has begun collecting additional fingerprints from international visitors arriving at Boston Logan International Airport.

4. India Employment Second Preference Becomes Unavailable – The annual limit for the India employment second preference category has been reached.

5. State Dept. Issues Travel Documentation Reminder – All persons traveling by air between the U.S. and Canada, Mexico, Bermuda, and the Caribbean region are required to present a passport or other valid travel document to enter or re-enter the U.S.

6. New ICE System Analyzes Suspicious Relationships, Patterns -The ICEPIC system is intended to assist investigators by “identifying suspect identities and discovering possible non-obvious relationships.”

7. Marriott Speaks Out on Immigration – Bill Marriott, chief executive officer of Marriott International, Inc., recently spoke about critical issues facing the hospitality industry.

8. New Publications and Items of Interest – New Publications and Items of Interest.

9. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members.


Details:

1. Naturalization Processing Times Increase Drastically

Because of a surge in applications over the summer and resulting massive backlogs, partly in anticipation of fee increases, the average processing time for naturalization applications has increased for applications filed after June 1, 2007, from the current average of seven months or less to approximately 18 months, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) said. Family-based adjustment of status applications increased from the current average of six months or less to 12 months.

Specifically, USCIS noted that in July and August of 2007, the agency received nearly 2.5 million applications and petitions, which was double the number typically received in a two-month period. In fiscal year (FY) 2007, USCIS received 1.4 million applications for naturalization, more than the totals from FYs 2006 and 2005 combined. Forty percent of those, or 562,000, were filed in the fourth quarter. Applications for employment- and family-based adjustment of status increased by 76 percent, from 497,000 in FY 2006 to 875,000 in FY 2007.

USCIS said it plans to reduce processing times to six months by the third quarter of fiscal year 2010. USCIS Director Emilio Gonzalez noted that up to several thousand new employees are being hired and trained to deal with the “deluge.” This is in addition to about 700 retired federal government employees who are being hired back without having to sacrifice their pensions, under a plan proposed by Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.).

A sign-on letter expressing deep concern about the delays notes, among other things, that “[m]any of the undersigned organizations opposed fee increases of the magnitude that USCIS proposed and warned that if USCIS were to proceed with the fee increases, it must prepare for a surge in applications from immigrants wishing to avoid the fee increases. In fact, USCIS did move forward with the fee increases, but did not adequately prepare to handle such a surge.” The sign-on letter is available at http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=24331.

An announcement about processing times and case status is available on page 5 of USCIS’s December 2007 newsletter at http://www.uscis.gov/files/nativedocuments/USCIS_Monthly_Dec07.pdf. Related testimony from Mr. Gonzalez on January 17, 2008, before the House of Representatives’ immigration subcommittee is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/testimony/testimony_ETG_17jan08.pdf.

Back to Top


2. H-2B Cap Reached

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that it has received a sufficient number of petitions to reach the congressionally mandated H-2B cap for the second half of fiscal year (FY) 2008. USCIS stated that January 2, 2008, is the “final receipt date” for new H-2B worker petitions requesting employment start dates before October 1, 2008. The final receipt date is defined as the date on which USCIS determines that it has received enough cap-subject petitions to reach the limit of 33,000 H-2B workers for the second half of FY 2008.

USCIS said it is rejecting any petitions for new H-2B workers seeking employment start dates before October 1, 2008, that arrive after January 2, 2008. The agency will apply a computer-generated random selection process to all petitions subject to the cap that were received on January 2, 2008, to select the number of petitions needed to meet the cap. USCIS will reject, and return the fee, for all cap-subject petitions not randomly selected.

Petitions for workers who are currently in H-2B status do not count toward the congressionally mandated biannual H-2B cap. USCIS will continue to process petitions filed to extend the stay of a current H-2B worker in the U.S.; change the terms of employment for current H-2B workers and extend their stay; or allow current H-2B workers to change or add employers and extend their stay.

Kathleen Campbell Walker, President of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA), said, “This continuing failure to connect the dots between meeting valid labor needs and our immigration laws is inexcusable. Placing America at a competitive disadvantage is unacceptable. Maxing out on a cap four months before the applicable period even begins shows how little relation there is between immigration policy and the needs of the economy.” AILA said that service industries such as hospitality, including restaurants and hotels, landscaping, construction, and seafood processing are among those most damaged by Congress’s inaction.

The USCIS announcement is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/H-2B_3jan08.pdf. AILA’s press release is available at http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=24215.

Back to Top


3. DHS Begins Collecting 10 Fingerprints at Boston Airport

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced on January 22, 2008, that it has begun collecting additional fingerprints from international visitors arriving at Boston Logan International Airport (Logan). The change is part of the DHS’s upgrade from two- to 10-fingerprint collection.

For more than four years, U.S. Department of State (DOS) consular officers and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers have been collecting biometrics—digital fingerprints and a photograph—from all non-U.S. citizens between the ages of 14 and 79, with some exceptions, when they apply for visas or arrive at U.S. ports of entry.

The department’s US-VISIT program includes checks of a visitor’s fingerprints against DHS records of immigration violators and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) records of criminals and known or suspected terrorists. The DHS said that collecting 10 fingerprints improves fingerprint matching accuracy and the agency’s ability to compare a visitor’s fingerprints against latent fingerprints collected by Department of Defense (DOD) and the FBI from “known and unknown” terrorists. Additionally, visitors’ fingerprints are checked against the FBI’s Criminal Master File.

On an average day at Logan, almost 2,000 international visitors complete US-VISIT biometric procedures. Visitors from the United Kingdom, Ireland, Germany, and France comprise the largest numbers of international visitors arriving at Logan.

Washington Dulles International Airport began 10-fingerprint collection on November 29, 2007, and Hartsfield Jackson Atlanta International Airport began 10-fingerprint collection on January 6, 2008. Seven other ports of entry will soon begin collecting additional fingerprints: Chicago O’Hare International Airport, San Francisco International Airport, George Bush Houston Intercontinental Airport, Miami International Airport, Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport, Orlando International Airport, and John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York. The remaining air, sea, and land ports will transition to collecting 10 fingerprints by the end of 2008, the DHS said.

The announcement is available at http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1201104663578.shtm.

Back to Top


4. India Employment Second Preference Becomes Unavailable

Despite two retrogressions of the India employment second preference cut-off date recently, demand for numbers by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service offices for adjustment of status cases has remained extremely high in recent months, the Department of State reported in the February 2008 Visa Bulletin. As a result, the annual limit for the India employment second preference immigrant visa category has been reached, and the category has become “unavailable.”

The latest Visa Bulletin is available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3925.html.

Back to Top


5. State Dept. Issues Travel Documentation Reminder

The Department of State issued a reminder that effective January 23, 2007, all persons traveling by air between the U.S. and Canada, Mexico, Bermuda, and the Caribbean region must present a passport or other valid travel document to enter or re-enter the U.S. Beginning January 31, 2008, U.S. and Canadian citizens need to present either a Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative (WHTI)-compliant document, or a government-issued photo ID, such as a driver’s license, plus proof of citizenship, such as a birth certificate.

At a later date, to be determined, the Departments of State and Homeland Security will implement the full requirements of the land and sea phase of WHTI. Proposed rules require most U.S. citizens entering the U.S. at sea or land ports of entry to have either a U.S. passport; a U.S. passport card; a trusted traveler card such as NEXUS, FAST, or SENTRI; a valid Merchant Mariner Document (MMD) when traveling in conjunction with official maritime business; or a valid U.S. Military identification card when traveling on official orders. Members of the U.S. Armed Forces on active duty traveling on orders are exempt from the passport requirement. The passport requirement does not apply to U.S. citizens traveling to or returning directly from a U.S. territory.

U.S. citizens may begin applying in advance for the new, limited-use, wallet-size passport card beginning February 1, 2008. The Department said it expects that the cards will be available and mailed to applicants in spring 2008. When available, it will only be valid for land and sea travel between the U.S. and Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean region, and Bermuda.

A related 23-page letter on the WHTI from Richard Stana, Director of Homeland Security and Justice Issues for the Government Accountability Office, to the House of Representatives’ Subcommittee on Border, Maritime and Global Counterterrorism, is available at http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=24355. Among other things, Mr. Stana noted that the GAO “acknowledge[s] that DHS has taken a number of actions to prepare for testing and deploying technologies and managing the implementation of other WHTI activities. However, as key elements of planning for program management and execution remain uncertain, we continue to believe that DHS faces challenges deploying technology, and staffing and training officers to use it.”

More information on the WHTI is available at http://travel.state.gov/travel/cbpmc/cbpmc_2223.html.

Back to Top


6. New ICE System Analyzes Suspicious Relationships, Patterns

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is implementing, effective February 29, 2008, the “ICE Pattern Analysis and Information Collection System” (ICEPIC). The system is intended to assist investigators by “identifying suspect identities and discovering possible non-obvious relationships among individuals and organizations” to discover violations of customs and immigration laws as well as possible terrorist threats or plots, according to a DHS report. The databases, which ICE declined to identify specifically, include those that track foreign students and visitors, immigrants, criminals and suspected terrorists. “All ICEPIC activity is associated with ongoing and valid law enforcement investigations,” the report noted.

The system reportedly includes the terrorist watch list, from which an estimated 15,000 people have appealed to have their names removed because of incomplete information or inaccuracies. According to the agency, ICEPIC builds on earlier ICE initiatives to verify the identity of Special Interest Aliens (SIAs), as designated by the Department of State. In 2003, ICE implemented the National Security Entry Exit Registration System (NSEERS) to manage the growing collection of over 500,000 SIA records. National and international terrorist threats during 2004 and 2005 resulted in ICE reviewing not only the SIA records in NSEERS, but also the records of those registered with the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS) and entered into the United States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology (US VISIT) system.

ICEPIC reveals relationships to an identified target, but it is not used to reveal a “predictive pattern,” the report said. From the relationships identified, ICE agents will develop specific leads and intelligence for active and new investigations. ICE is claiming certain exemptions from the Privacy Act.

A proposed rule announcing the system is available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20081800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-1556.pdf. A January 30 proposed rule to exempt parts of ICEPIC from the Privacy Act is at http://frwebgate1.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate.cgi?WAISdocID=042632391282+0+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve. The report is available at http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/privacy/privacy_pia_ice_icepic.pdf.

Back to Top


7. Marriott Speaks Out on Immigration

Bill Marriott, chief executive officer of Marriott International, Inc., recently spoke at the National Press Club on January 17, 2008, about critical issues facing the hospitality industry. Mr. Marriott is an advocate of immigration reform and creating an efficient visa system. “This country is powered really by immigrant labor,” he said, noting that about 300,000 new workers will be needed over the next several years in his industry and that U.S. visa policies are discouraging foreign workers and visitors from coming. “It’s too tough to visit America. Here in the U.S. we need to put out the welcome mat.”

Mr. Marriott has also sounded off about immigration issues on his blog: “Without hard-working, law-abiding immigrants to the United States – many who come from Mexico – the hospitality industry could not function. It’s just that simple.” He said his company “continues to support changes in the U.S. laws that not only create a path to legal status for immigrants, but also protect the integrity of our U.S. borders.” Mr. Marriott noted that “[r]emoving 12 million undocumented workers from our economy with near full employment would be an absolute disaster for us. We’d like to see a fast, efficient and accurate employment verification system so when we hire someone, we know they are legal.” He said that “[a]t Marriott we firmly believe that the diversity of our workforce makes us great because it’s a reflection of our ever-diversifying global customer base. We value our associates – it doesn’t really matter where they’re born.”

Mr. Marriott’s comments on immigration are available on his blog, which also includes audio links, at http://www.blogs.marriott.com/employment/default.asp?item=704047and http://www.blogs.marriott.com/employment/default.asp?item=499434.

Back to Top


8. New Publications and Items of Interest

USCIS ombudsman hosts teleconferences. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Ombudsman is hosting teleconferences to discuss interactions with the agency. Questions and answers from previous teleconferences have been posted recently to the Web site. Topics available include N-648 medical waivers, the new naturalization test, the USCIS receipting delay, and temporary worker visas. See http://www.dhs.gov/xabout/structure/gc_1171038701035.shtm.
Back to Top


9. Recent News from ABIL Members

Bernie Wolfsdorf (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-wolfsdorf.cfm), the American Immigration Lawyers Association’s First Vice President, recently spoke at the Midyear Conference on Investor Visa Options and will be speaking to the Los Angeles County Bar on February 9 on H-1B visas and alternatives.

Stephen Yale-Loehr (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-loehr.cfm) has written a chapter, “The Immigrant Client,” in a new book published by the New York State Bar Association. The book, called The Plaintiff’s Personal Injury Action in New York State, provides a comprehensive review of plaintiff personal injury practice in New York by legal experts who have written respective chapters pertinent to their area of expertise. Steve’s chapter focuses on how to handle personal injury cases when representing an immigrant plaintiff. The chapter highlights the significance of identifying an immigrant’s status in the U.S., analyzes the key cases in both the federal and New York courts, and emphasizes the benefits of consulting with a good immigration lawyer when representing a foreign national who has been injured in an accident.

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2008-02-01 00:00:142019-09-18 03:06:27News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 4, No. 2 • February 01, 2008

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 4, No. 1 • January 01, 2008

January 01, 2008/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. Fees Raised for Nonimmigrant, Immigrant Visa Applications; BCCs – The Department is raising the fees in light of increased security measures and fee collection mandates on behalf of the FBI.

2. Rhetoric on Support for Science Doesn’t Match Reality of Appropriations – The appropriations bill signed into law in December included meager funding for advances in scientific research rather than the more substantial increases that had been expected.

3. Department of State To Begin Issuing Passport Cards – The final rule provides for a card-format passport as a less expensive and more portable alternative to the passport book.

4. Revised I-9 Verification Forms Now Required – Employers should have transitioned to using the revised Employment Eligibility Verification Form (I-9).

5. Department of State Expands Fingerprinting and Name Checks – The Department has begun performing fingerprint and name checks on all visa applicants except those falling within a narrow range of exceptions.

6. Oral Declarations of Citizenship No Longer Sufficient At Land, Sea POEs – Citizens of the United States, Canada, and Bermuda entering the U.S. at land or sea ports-of-entry will be expected to present documents proving citizenship and identity.

7. State Dept. Issues Final Rule on Exchange Visitor Program Sanctions, Terminations – The Department of State is adopting as final, with “minor edits,” its proposed rule on exchange visitor program sanctions and terminations.

8. India Second Preference Cut-Off Date Retrogresses – For January, it has been necessary to retrogress the India employment second preference cut-off date because of continued heavy applicant demand.

9. Around the States: Illinois, Arizona, REAL ID/WHTI Update – In the void created by Congress’s lack of action on comprehensive immigration reform, states are not sitting idly by.

10. DHS Publishes Semiannual Regulatory Agenda – The federal government is moving agencies’ full regulatory agendas online.

11. New Publications and Items of Interest -New Publications and Items of Interest

12. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members


Details:

1. Fees Raised for Nonimmigrant, Immigrant Visa Applications; BCCs

The Department of State has published an interim final rule, effective January 1, 2008, that raises from $100 to $131 the fee charged to process an application for a nonimmigrant machine-readable visa (MRV) and Border Crossing Card (BCC). Applicants who paid the prior $100 application fee before January 1 will be processed only if they are scheduled and appear for a visa interview on or before January 31. Applicants who paid the prior $100 application fee and appear for visa interviews after January 31, 2008, must pay the difference ($31) before they will be interviewed. The rule also increases the immigrant visa fee by $20, to $355.

The Department said it is adjusting the fees “as an emergency measure to ensure that sufficient resources are available to meet the costs of processing nonimmigrant and immigrant visas in light of increased security measures put in place since 2004 and fee collection mandates on behalf of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.” The primary reason for increasing the fees, the Department noted, is that in January 2008, the Department “will begin paying fees to the FBI for checking the fingerprints against the FBI’s Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System (IAFIS) and for running visa applicant names through Security Advisory Opinion (SAO) processes.”

The estimated total increase in cost for nonimmigrant visa applicants is $310 million ($31 per applicant, with an estimated 10,000,000 applicants). The estimated total increase in cost for immigrant visa applicants is $14 million ($20 per applicant, with an estimated 700,000 applicants).

The full text of the interim final rule is available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/pdf/E7-24646.pdf. The Department’s related notice is available at http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2007/dec/97384.htm.

Back to Top


2. Rhetoric on Support for Science Doesn’t Match Reality of Appropriations

The appropriations bill (H.R. 2764) signed into law by President Bush on December 26, 2007, included what some observers are calling meager funding for advances in scientific research rather than the more substantial increases that had been expected. “[W]hat began as a year of soaring rhetoric in support of science seems likely to end with agency officials and research advocates shaking their heads and wondering what went wrong,” said the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).

The White House had promoted the “America Creating Opportunities To Meaningfully Promote Excellence In Technology, Education, And Science Act (America COMPETES)” Act, signed into law in August 2007, as, among other things, a comprehensive strategy to “attract[ ] the world’s best and brightest workers.” The new appropriations package, however, “makes moot the double-digit hikes authorized for research, education and training, and investment in innovation spelled out” in America COMPETES, said AAAS.

There was some advance warning that funding might not rise to meet expectations raised by the earlier legislation and accompanying rhetoric. In a White House statement issued in August in conjunction with President Bush’s signing of America COMPETES, Mr. Bush said he was “concerned that the legislation include[d] excessive authorizations and new duplicative programs.” The statement noted that the bill created over 30 new programs that were “mostly duplicative or counterproductive,” including a new Department of Energy agency to fund late-stage technology development “more appropriately left to the private sector,” and that the bill provided “excessive authorization for existing programs.” Accordingly, the August statement noted that the President would “request funding in his 2009 budget for those authorizations that support the focused priorities of the [President’s “American Competitiveness Initiative” (ACI)], but will not propose excessive or duplicative funding based on authorizations in the bill.”

“Riding the Rising Tide: A 21st Century Strategy for U.S. Competitiveness and Prosperity,” a report by the Alliance for Science & Technology Research in America (ASTRA) released in December 2007 shortly before the appropriations legislation was signed into law, provides a 14-point action program. ASTRA recommends, among other things, that the U.S. “strengthen efforts to attract top foreign students and Ph.D.-level professionals in science, engineering and technology. This includes developing a national strategic plan for recruiting top international students, scientists, engineers and technologists, and evaluating the U.S. immigration system to remove barriers to these talented individuals migrating to the U.S.” This approach, ASTRA said, “should include incentives to attract leading foreign-born scientists, engineers, and technologists, including public funding for their research if they migrate to and carry out that research in the United States.”

The ASTRA report is available at http://www.aboutastra.org/pdf/ASTRARisingTide121107.pdf. An ASTRA statement about the appropriations legislation is available at http://www.aboutastra.org/latest_news/12-18-2007_funding.asp. AAAS’s statement is available at http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2007/1218/1. The August 2007 White House statement is available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/08/20070809-6.html.

Back to Top


3. Department of State To Begin Issuing Passport Cards

To be “responsive to the needs and concerns of the border communities and to facilitate the travel of border community residents,” the Department of State has finalized a proposed rule issued in October 2006 providing for a card-format passport as a less expensive and more portable alternative to the passport book.

The final rule explains that the passport card does not need to be signed to be valid, whereas the passport book requires a signature to be valid. In addition, it makes clear that those requesting and eligible for a no-fee passport will receive a passport in book form only.

The Department said it received over 4,000 comments regarding the proposed rule. Among those submitting comments were four members of Congress; the governments of Canada and two of its provinces (Manitoba and New Brunswick); a Native American government (Haudenosaunee Confederation, New York); and dozens of city, county, and municipal governments. Also represented were the U.S. Postal Service, the Air Transport Association, over two dozen technology companies and privacy interest groups, five tourism interest groups, and three offshore drilling concerns.

All four members of Congress, as well as technology, security, and privacy groups, said they were concerned about the choice of “vicinity read’ radio frequency identification (RFID) technology for the passport card. The opinion expressed by many commenters was that vicinity read technology is not as secure as the proximity read technology currently used in the U.S. e-Passport because it could result in the unauthorized reading of information that could lead to identity theft and tracking of U.S. citizens by terrorists or the government. Several commenters mentioned a 2006 Government Accountability Office review of the US-VISIT program, which reported a low read rate using this type of technology and a statement in the report that it should be used only to track goods, not to identify people. A private company that designs, manufactures, and markets both vicinity and proximity read technology chips commented that the choice of vicinity read technology could have the unexpected result of compromising the security of U.S. borders while severely affecting the personal privacy of U.S. citizens. They also questioned whether vicinity read technology would necessarily improve border crossing times.

The Department said that the vast majority of such comments “reflected an improper understanding of the business model that WHTI [the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative] is designed to meet and how the technology selected would actually be implemented.” Vicinity-read RFID technology “should allow CBP [Customs and Border Protection] officers to quickly obtain information about the border crosser and perform terrorist watch list checks while they are still awaiting a personal inspection and to read multiple cards simultaneously.” To ensure compatibility and interoperability with the Department of Homeland Security’s border management system, and to secure “significant travel facilitation advantages,” the Department of State said it will produce the passport card using vicinity RFID technology. “The operational concept that this rule promulgates should enable information about a border crosser to be queued while they are awaiting their interviews with the border officers, rather than waiting until they are face-to-face with the officer to provide their personal information,” the Department said, adding that this approach “is designed to substantially reduce wait times at the border, which was the key driver in development of the WHTI passport card business case.”

The Department explained that the vicinity RFID electronic chip contains only one item of information: a unique identifying number that has meaning only inside the secure CBP computer system. No other form of personally identifiable information, such as name, date of birth, Social Security number, or place of birth, will be stored electronically on the passport card or transmitted through RFID. All personal information will be contained in Department of Homeland Security systems and will be accessible only by authorized personnel through secure networks, the Department said. Upon receipt of the passport card number, the border crosser’s personal information will be downloaded from the CBP system and provided to the CBP officer. The CBP officer will then interview the individual, verify his or her identity, and determine the appropriate action to take.

All card holders will also be issued a protective sleeve for the card, which prevents transmission of the card’s unique identifying number. Additionally, use of the passport card is not mandatory. Border crossers who would prefer to use traditional passports may continue to do so, the Department said.

Many commenters also discussed the technology solution in the e-passport, whose business model is different from that of the WHTI, the Department said. In the e-passport case, a different technology solution was selected that enables transfer of personal information in a secure, encrypted, manner. The technology solution for e-passports does not meet the business model for the specific WHTI application, so it was not selected, the Department noted.

The final rule is available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/pdf/E7-25422.pdf.

Back to Top


4. Revised I-9 Verification Forms Now Required

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) reminded employers that they should have transitioned to using the revised Employment Eligibility Verification Form (I-9). The revised I-9, which includes the revision date (Rev. 06/05/07)N printed on the lower right corner of the form, is now the only version valid for use. Effective December 26, 2007, employers who fail to use the revised form are subject to applicable penalties.

The revised form is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/i-9.pdf, and accompanying instructions are at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=31b3ab0a43b5d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCRD&vgnextchannel=db029c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD. The “Handbook for Employers, Instructions for Completing the Form I-9” is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/nativedocuments/m-274.pdf. The reminder is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/FormI9Reminder112307.pdf.

Back to Top


5. Department of State Expands Fingerprinting and Name Checks

The Department of State has issued a final rule on documentation of nonimmigrants entering the U.S. Specifically, the Department has begun performing fingerprint and name checks on all visa applicants except those falling within a narrow range of exceptions. Fingerprints are now required of all visa applicants except those under the age of 14 or over the age of 79 and certain diplomats and officials. Beginning on January 1, 2008, the cost of such checks is included in visa fees, including the fees for nonimmigrant visas.

The final rule is available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/pdf/E7-25417.pdf.

Back to Top


6. Oral Declarations of Citizenship No Longer Sufficient At Land, Sea POEs

Citizens of the United States, Canada, and Bermuda entering the U.S. at land or sea ports-of-entry (POEs) must establish their identity and citizenship to the satisfaction of a U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer. Under current CBP procedures, such individuals may provide any proof of identity and citizenship. Although most individuals provide documentary evidence of citizenship, such as a passport or birth certificate, individuals currently may be admitted on an oral declaration, depending on the circumstances. Effective January 31, 2008, however, all travelers must present documents proving citizenship (such as a birth certificate), and government-issued documents proving identity (such as a driver’s license), when entering the U.S. through land and sea POEs. CBP retains its authority to request additional documentation when warranted and to make appropriate individual exceptions.

For more on the new requirements, see http://travel.state.gov/travel/cbpmc/cbpmc_2223.html.

Back to Top


7. State Dept. Issues Final Rule on Exchange Visitor Program Sanctions, Terminations

Effective January 22, 2008, the Department of State is adopting as final, with “minor edits,” its proposed rule on exchange visitor program sanctions and terminations as published on May 31, 2007.

The final rule includes two new grounds for sanctions or terminations: actions that may compromise national security or undermine U.S. foreign policy objectives. The Department also eliminated the requirement that it find alleged violations to be willful or negligent before imposing sanctions. “Since knowledge and ability to comply and remain in full compliance with the regulations are fundamental requirements of sponsor designation, it is essentially irrelevant whether a sponsor violates regulations willfully, negligently, or even inadvertently,” the Department noted. “Violations, whether or not willful or negligent, may harm the national security or the public diplomacy goals of the United States, or pose a threat to the health, safety or welfare of program participants, and the Department must have the capacity to respond appropriately. Moreover, the process set forth in the revised sanctions regulations provides that a sponsor being sanctioned may submit a statement in opposition to or mitigation of the proposed sanction.”

The supplementary information to the final rule, which was published on December 20, 2007, and is available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/pdf/E7-24650.pdf, includes a number of comments received on the proposed rule, along with the Department’s responses.

Back to Top


8. India Second Preference Cut-Off Date Retrogresses

The Department of State announced that, for January, it has been necessary to retrogress the India employment second preference cut-off date because of continued heavy applicant demand for numbers by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services for adjustment of status cases. The Department said it is likely that the annual limit for this category will be reached within the next few months, at which time the category would become “unavailable” for the remainder of fiscal year 2008.

The January 2008 Visa Bulletin is available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3897.html.

Back to Top


9. Around the States: Illinois, Arizona, REAL ID/WHTI Update

In the void created by Congress’s lack of action on comprehensive immigration reform, states are not sitting idly by. The following is an update on key developments around the nation.

Illinois. In September, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) filed a lawsuit in federal court to declare invalid an Illinois statute, the “Right to Privacy in the Workplace Act,” that effectively forbids Illinois employers from enrolling in the DHS’s E-Verify (employment authorization verification) system. According to the DHS, the statute was to become effective on January 1, 2008. In papers filed with the court on December 13, 2007, however, the state agreed not to enforce the new law until the DHS’s lawsuit against the state is resolved. It also disclosed that the Illinois legislature is considering a bill to address the legal issues raised in the suit.

The DHS said it will communicate with each of the Illinois employers enrolled in E-Verify to let them know that they may continue using E-Verify without fear of a state enforcement action on January 1. The state’s decision also allows employers planning to enroll in E-Verify to do so without the threat of state enforcement against them.

In a motion filed with the DHS, the state requested a 60-day stay of the lawsuit so that the Illinois legislature would have an opportunity to consider proposed changes in the Illinois statute. Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff said, “I remain hopeful that Illinois will amend its law so that Illinois employers can continue to utilize this valuable tool without the need for further litigation.”

The DHS’s statement is at http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1197585316378.shtm.

Arizona. The Washington Post termed Arizona the “new ground zero” in the debate over undocumented immigration. Arizona passed a law, effective January 1, 2008, that prescribes sanctions for companies that knowingly hire undocumented workers. On a second offense, the company’s business license would be revoked, which Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano has called a corporate “death penalty.” In an editorial published on December 26, 2007, the Post said the Arizona law may become “a test case for how much pain a state is willing to endure, and inflict, in the name of ridding itself of a population that contributes enormously to its economic growth and prosperity.” The Post noted that an estimated 9 to 12 percent of Arizona’s 3 million workers are undocumented. The law is being challenged by business associations and others in court.

According to “Immigrants in Arizona: Fiscal and Economic Impacts,” a study by Judith Gans of the University of Arizona, the total state tax revenue attributable to immigrant workers in 2004 was an estimated $2.4 billion (about $860 million for naturalized citizens plus about $1.5 billion for noncitizens). Balanced against estimated fiscal costs of $1.4 billion (for education, health care, and law enforcement), the net 2004 fiscal impact of immigrants in Arizona was positive by about $940 million. The 2004 total economic output attributable to immigrant workers was about $44 billion ($15 billion for naturalized citizens and $29 billion for noncitizens). This output included $20 billion in labor and other income and resulted in approximately 400,000 full-time-equivalent jobs. The study did not distinguish between authorized and unauthorized workers. The study, which includes demographics and other details about immigrant workers in various industries in Arizona, is available at http://udallcenter.arizona.edu/programs/immigration/publications/immigrants_in_arizona.pdf.

WHTI/REAL ID update. On December 6, 2007, the DHS and Arizona signed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) to enhance the security of state driver’s licenses, to offer a Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative (WHTI)-compliant document to U.S. citizen residents and to pledge future compliance with the requirements of the REAL ID Act.

The Arizona agreement is much like those established with the states of Washington, Vermont, and New York earlier this year, the DHS said. The state of Arizona will develop a technologically enhanced driver’s license that will securely validate the identity and U.S. citizenship of Arizona residents who voluntarily apply and qualify. The enhanced driver’s license, which is proposed to be accepted for border-crossing purposes under WHTI, is expected to be slightly more expensive than a standard Arizona driver’s license and will require proof of citizenship, identity, and residence. The enhanced document also will be aligned to comply with REAL ID over time. The DHS, in turn, will provide the technology and data-sharing specifications to facilitate the use and verification of the enhanced driver’s license at a port of entry.

In addition, Arizona has pledged to become compliant with REAL ID as soon as practicable, the DHS said. The agency plans to issue soon the REAL ID final rule, which is intended to strengthen identification through both physical security features and a secure issuance process. Arizona’s REAL ID-compliant license will be available to U.S. citizen residents who do not wish to obtain an enhanced driver’s license.

REAL ID establishes minimum standards for state-issued driver’s licenses and identification cards in compliance with the REAL ID Act of 2005. The requirements include security features that must be incorporated into each card; verification of information provided by applicants to establish their identity and lawful status in the United States; and physical security standards for locations where licenses and identification cards are issued. A REAL ID driver’s license will be required to access a federal facility, board federally-regulated commercial aircraft, and enter nuclear power plants.

The DHS and the Department of State expect the date of full WHTI implementation to be in the summer of 2008. At that time U.S. citizens traveling between the U.S. and Canada, Mexico, Central and South America, the Caribbean, and Bermuda by land or sea will be required to present a valid U.S. passport or other acceptable document. The precise implementation date will be formally announced with at least 60 days’ notice, the DHS said in a statement at http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1196971699639.shtm.

Back to Top


10. DHS Publishes Semiannual Regulatory Agenda

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has published its semiannual regulatory agenda, which is a summary of all current and projected rulemakings, reviews of existing regulations, and completed actions of the DHS.

Among the upcoming actions, the DHS and the Department of Labor’s Employment and Training Administration (DOL) plan to propose changes “to reduce the incentives and opportunities for fraud and abuse related to the permanent employment of aliens in the United States.” The DHS is considering the elimination of the substitution of beneficiaries on permanent labor certifications, among other options. In addition, the DHS is proposing to reduce further the likelihood of the submission of “malafide” Forms I-140, Immigration Petitions for Alien Worker, which the DHS defines as employment-based petitions “that are supported by fraudulent or stale labor certification applications,” by proposing a 45-day period for employers to file approved permanent labor certifications in support of I-140 petitions with the DHS after the issuance of an approved labor certification by the DOL. The notice of proposed rulemaking is targeted for publication in March 2008.

Also targeted for publication in March 2008 is a notice of proposed rulemaking that will modify DHS regulations governing the established Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS) I-901 and the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) certification fees to defray actual costs of related SEVP operating expenses. The proposed rule also would establish a fee to defray SEVP operating expenses related to oversight and recertification of SEVP-certified schools.

Portions of the DHS’s semiannual regulatory agenda are available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/10dec20070800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/ua071210/pdf/ua071008.pdf. The federal government is moving agencies’ full regulatory agendas online. Because publication in the Federal Register is mandated, the DHS’s printed agenda entries include regulatory actions that are in the agency’s regulatory flexibility agenda, in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, because they are likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Printing of these entries, however, is limited to fields that contain information required by the Act’s agenda requirements. For more information on the full regulatory agendas, see http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaMain.

Back to Top


11. New Publications and Items of Interest

DOL releases new, updated FAQs. On December 17, 2007, the Department of Labor released Round 8 of its Backlog Elimination FAQs. The new FAQ is available at http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/backlog_faqs_12-17-07.pdf.

On December 12, 2007, the DOL also updated its extensive FAQ on labor certification. The FAQ is available at http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/faqsanswers.cfm. Related links are available on the Web page.

Also on December 12, 2007, the DOL released Round 2 of its H-2B FAQ, at http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/h2b_faqs_round2.pdf.

Links to these and other recent FAQs are available at http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/.

USCIS updates guide for new immigrants. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has released an updated version of Welcome to the United States: A Guide for New Immigrants. The new Guide includes links to new online tools for USCIS services and information from the Department of Health and Human Services and other federal, state, and community organizations. In addition to settlement and integration information, the Guide contains an introduction to the U.S. system of government, a section on rights and responsibilities, and information on how to obtain citizenship. It also has information about finding a place to live, getting a Social Security number, getting a job, registering children for school, finding health care, locating English language and adult education classes, preparing for emergencies, and finding community organizations that assist immigrants.

USCIS has added Polish and Urdu translations of the Guide, making it available in English and 12 foreign languages, including Arabic, Chinese, French, Haitian Creole, Korean, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Tagalog, and Vietnamese.

All translations of the Guide and other resources for new immigrants are available at http://www.uscis.gov/newimmigrants. The announcement is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/NewGuide121107.pdf.

‘American Dream’ DVD series. The American Dream DVD series tells the history of immigration to the United States and the stories of prominent immigrant citizens and their contributions to America. The series is used in over 1,200 high school classrooms nationwide. The newest DVD in the series, “The Mexican Immigration Experience,” has just been released. The series, which has won several awards, is available at http://www.meragefoundations.com/mfad_DVD_series.html.

Back to Top


12. Recent News from ABIL Members

Angelo Paparelli (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-paparelli.cfm) was quoted in the December 13, 2007, edition of the Los Angeles Times, commenting on Secretary of State Michael Chertoff’s recent statements about the REAL ID Act and the E-Verify work authorization verification system for employers: “Chertoff is not wrong for trying to enforce the law, but he’s being disingenuous. Until they fix and improve the integrity of their own databases and the security of the process that issues documents of identity, they cannot honestly expect employers to comply with the demands that they’re making.” Mr. Paparelli also criticized Congress for failing to fund either the REAL ID program or needed corrections to government databases. “Without resources, Chertoff is essentially doing the only thing readily within his power. He’s authorizing raids of work sites.”

Stephen Yale-Loehr (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-loehr.cfm) wrote an article about local and state immigration laws in the most recent issue of the Cornell Law Forum. The article focused on ordinances enacted in Hazleton, Pennsylvania, that attempted to restrict illegal immigration. A federal judge declared the Hazleton law unconstitutional. Mr. Yale-Loehr testified as an expert witness in that case. The article is available at http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/Law-Forum.cfm.

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2008-01-01 00:00:212019-09-18 03:11:13News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 4, No. 1 • January 01, 2008

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 3, No. 12 • December 01, 2007

December 01, 2007/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. No-Match Letters Will Not Be Sent This Year, SSA Says; DHS Will Revise Rule – The SSA will not send out no-match letters this year to employers, in response to a preliminary injunction.

2. USCIS Releases New Form I-9 – USCIS has revised the I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification Form, to be required beginning December 26, as a first step toward achieving the document reduction goals.

3. Basic Pilot Findings Released – The accuracy of USCIS’s database used for verification has “improved substantially” since the start of the Basic Pilot program, but further improvements are needed.

4. Nonimmigrant Visa Delays Caused by Electronic Verification Requirement – The change has resulted in delays from interview to visa issuance at many posts.

5. USCIS Releases List of EB-5 Regional Centers – USCIS recently released a list of active approved EB-5 regional centers as of October 2007.

6. DHS To Begin Requiring 10 Fingerprints at Ports of Entry – The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) will begin requiring 10 fingerprints, instead of just two, from international visitors who fly into certain ports of entry.

7. DHS Converting Checks Into Electronic Transfers for I-765 – The Department of Homeland Security is now converting funds from checks into electronic funds transfers for the Application for Employment Authorization.

8. USCIS Centralizes Filing for H-2A Petitions – USCIS announced that effective December 10, 2007, it will only accept H-2A (temporary/seasonal agricultural worker) petitions mailed or delivered to its California Service Center.

9. Department of State Issues Record Number of Student Visas – The Department of State announced that it has issued a record number of visas to students to study in the U.S.

10. ICE Nominee’s Confirmation Is Uncertain in Senate – A confirmation vote in the Senate for Julie Myers to direct U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has not yet been scheduled.

11. Target and Whole Foods Market Charged with Discriminating Against Immigrant Workers – The charges allege that the companies illegally fired and suspended two immigrant workers who had presented clear evidence of their authorization to work in the U.S.

12. State Dept. Issues Final Passport Rule – The final rule reorganizes, restructures, and updates passport regulations.

13. China, India Second Preference Cut-Off Dates Retrogress; Other Projections – The China-mainland born and India employment second preference cut-off dates both will retrogress in December; the Department of State also made other projections.

14. Japan Begins Fingerprinting, Photographing Foreign Visitors – Those refusing to comply will be denied admission into Japan and will be returned to their port of origin.

15. New Publications and Items of Interest -New Publications and Items of Interest

16. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members


Details:

1. No-Match Letters Will Not Be Sent This Year, SSA Says; DHS Will Revise Rule

A Social Security Administration (SSA) spokesperson reportedly has stated that the SSA will not send out no-match letters this year to employers, in response to an October 10, 2007, preliminary injunction from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California that enjoined and restrained the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the SSA from implementing the final rule, “Safe-Harbor Procedures for Employers Who Receive a No-Match Letter.” The preliminary injunction did not preclude the SSA from sending out its traditional no-match letters without the final rule language. According to sources, the SSA is unlikely to send out no-match letters until spring 2008 at the earliest, when the DHS has said it plans to revise the rule. SSA said it did not have sufficient time to revise the no-match letter in 2007. The SSA sends no-match letters, which detail discrepancies between SSA data and information sent in by employers, to approximately 138,000 employers each year concerning as many as nine million employees.
Back to Top


2. USCIS Releases New Form I-9

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has revised the I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification Form, to be required beginning December 26, as a first step toward achieving the document reduction goals under the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act and “as a further step in its ongoing work toward reducing the number of documents used to confirm identity and work eligibility,” the agency said.

The most significant change to the I-9 is the elimination of the following five documents from List A of the List of Acceptable Documents:

  • Certificate of U.S. Citizenship (N-560 or N-561)
  • Certificate of Naturalization (N-550 or N-570)
  • Alien Registration Receipt Card (I-151)
  • Unexpired Reentry Permit (I-327)
  • Unexpired Refugee Travel Document (I-571)

One document was added to List A of the List of Acceptable Documents:

  • Unexpired Employment Authorization Document (I-766)

All the Employment Authorization Documents with photographs that are in circulation are now included as one item on List A:

  • I-688, I-688A, I-688B, I-766

Instructions for the I-9 also now state that the employee is not obliged to provide the Social Security Number in Section 1 of the I-9, unless he or she is employed by an employer who participates in E-Verify (formerly Basic Pilot). The section on Photocopying and Retaining Form I-9 now includes information about electronically signing and retaining I-9 forms.

Employers should begin using the amended I-9 “(Rev. 06/05/07)N” immediately for all individuals hired on or after November 7, 2007. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said it “recognizes that employers should be afforded a period of time to transition to the amended Form I-9.” The DHS therefore will not seek penalties against an employer for using a previous version of the I-9 during a transition period ending on December 26, 2007. After the transition period, employers who fail to use the revised I-9 may be subject to penalties.

Employers only need to complete the new I-9 for new employees. Employers do not need to complete new forms for existing employees, but employers must use the revised I-9 when their employees require reverification.

The new I-9 form is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/i-9.pdf. The updated Handbook for Employers (M-274) is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/nativedocuments/m-274.pdf. Details about the revised I-9 are available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/FormI9FS110707.pdf. A reminder with the deadline is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/FormI9Reminder112307.pdf. The USCIS Federal Register notice dated November 26, 2007, is available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/pdf/07-5790.pdf. Copies of the documents that are acceptable under the new I-9 requirements may be obtained in a brochure, “Guide to Selected U.S. Travel and Identity Documents” (M-396), which may be ordered in bulk from U.S. Customs and Border Protection, National Distribution Center, P.O. Box 68912, Indianapolis, IN 46268; fax: (317) 290-3046.

Back to Top


3. Basic Pilot Findings Released

Recent findings about the Web-based Basic Pilot program, now called E-Verify, have been released. Among other things, the new report notes that employers are satisfied with many aspects of the new online version of the former Basic Pilot program. Also, the accuracy of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) database used for verification has “improved substantially” since the start of Basic Pilot. Further improvements are needed, however, the report notes, especially if the program is mandated nationally.

Most importantly, the report states, the database used for verification “is still not sufficiently up to date to meet the [Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996] requirement for accurate verification, especially for naturalized citizens.” The report notes that USCIS and the Social Security Administration accommodate this problem by providing for a manual review of these cases, which is “time-consuming and can result in discrimination against work-authorized foreign-born persons during the period that the verification is ongoing, if employers do not follow procedures designed to protect employee rights.”

E-Verify allows employers to get automated confirmation of a newly hired employee’s work authorization after an Employment Eligibility Verification (Form I-9) has been completed. Employers who sign up to participate complete the I-9 process as usual, but then enter and submit I-9 information through a Web-based computer program to the Social Security Administration (SSA) database. If the SSA does not have sufficient information to confirm work authorization status, queries are sent to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) for confirmation. If more information is required to complete the confirmation process, the employer is asked to have the employee contact the SSA or USCIS to provide the needed information.

The report, which includes recommendations, is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/WebBasicPilotRprtSept2007.pdf. Related materials are available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=89abf90517e15110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD.

Back to Top


4. Nonimmigrant Visa Delays Caused by Electronic Verification Requirement

According to a Department of State cable (No. 155679) sent to the field on November 13, 2007, consular posts are now able to access the details of approved nonimmigrant visa petitions in a new report called “PIMS” (Petition Information Management Service). The Kentucky Consular Center (KCC) has ceased e-mailing scanned copies of approved petitions to posts. The electronic PIMS record created by the KCC will now be the primary source of evidence to be used in determining petition approval. This applies to all nonimmigrant petition-based visa categories (H, L, O, P, and Q). The PIMS Petition Report contains a record of all petitioners recorded by the KCC as having approved petitions since 2004. In addition, many of the records contain information from KCC’s Fraud Prevention Unit.

Reportedly, this unanticipated change has resulted in four-day delays at many posts from interview to visa issuance for these categories. The Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers is monitoring the situation.

Back to Top


5. USCIS Releases List of EB-5 Regional Centers

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services recently released an updated list of active approved EB-5 “Regional Centers,” which are public or private entities approved to participate in the EB-5 immigrant investor program. The Regional Center program makes the investor program useful for those unable to invest the full $1 million by allowing $500,000 investments that require minimal hands-on involvement and are useful for those who do not have the time or resources to qualify their own business for this permanent residence program.

The list, current as of October 2007, is available at http://www.globallawcenters.com/pdfs/23812.pdf. For more on the role of Regional Centers in the EB-5 program, see http://www.greencardinvestor.com/regional.html.

Back to Top


6. DHS To Begin Requiring 10 Fingerprints at Ports of Entry

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is now requiring 10 fingerprints, instead of just two, from international visitors who fly into Washington Dulles International Airport. The US-VISIT requirement will be expanded to nine additional airports next spring:

  • Boston Logan International Airport
  • Chicago O’Hare International Airport
  • Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport
  • Hartsfield?Jackson Atlanta International Airport
  • George Bush Houston Intercontinental Airport
  • Miami International Airport
  • John F. Kennedy International Airport (NYC)
  • Orlando International Airport
  • San Francisco International Airport

By the end of 2008, the DHS plans to deploy the expanded fingerprint system to 107 other airports and to begin collecting 10 fingerprints at other ports of entry. The Department of State currently uses 10?fingerprint scanners at most of its visa?issuing posts and will complete deployment worldwide by the end of 2007.

Back to Top


7. DHS Converting Checks Into Electronic Transfers for I-765

The Department of Homeland Security is now converting funds from checks into electronic funds transfers for the Application for Employment Authorization (Form I-765). Checks should be made payable to “U.S. Department of Homeland Security.” The DHS notes in the instructions to the form that “[y]ou will not receive your original check back. We will destroy your original check, but we will keep a copy of it. If the EFT [electronic funds transfer] cannot be processed for technical reasons, you authorize us to process the copy in place of your original check. If the EFT cannot be completed because of insufficient funds, we may try to make the transfer up to two times.” In the past, sources noted, the receipt number could be retrieved from the cancelled check to track the application if the receipt got lost in the mail.
Back to Top


8. USCIS Centralizes Filing for H-2A Petitions

In a Federal Register notice published on November 9, 2007, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that effective December 10, 2007, it will only accept H-2A (temporary/seasonal agricultural worker) petitions mailed or delivered to its California Service Center. The following addresses should be used:

Direct mail:

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center
Attn: H-2A Processing Unit
P.O. Box 10140
Laguna Niguel, CA 92607-1040

Non-U.S. Postal Service deliveries (e.g., private couriers):

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center
Attn: H-2A Processing Unit
24000 Avila Road, Room 2312
Laguna Niguel, CA 92677

The notice also states that USCIS will return to the petitioner any H-2A petition received on or after December 10, 2007, at a different Service Center, and will instruct the petitioner to file at the correct location. Previously, H-2A petitioners could file with either the USCIS California or Vermont Service Center. USCIS’s press release announcing the change is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/H2A_filing_9nov07.pdf.

Back to Top


9. Department of State Issues Record Number of Student Visas

The Department of State announced on November 16, 2007, that it has issued a record number of visas to students coming to study in the U.S., exceeding pre-9/11 levels. During fiscal year 2007, the Department issued more than 651,000 student and exchange visitor visas, which was 10 percent more than last year and 90,000 more than were issued in fiscal year 2001.

The notice is available at http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2007/nov/95290.htm.

Back to Top


10. ICE Nominee’s Confirmation Is Uncertain in Senate

A confirmation vote in the Senate for Julie Myers to direct U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has not yet been scheduled. Concerns about her inexperience reportedly have subsided, but the outcome remains uncertain. Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) continues to have concerns and is consulting with members before deciding how to proceed, according to a spokesperson. Ms. Myers recently found herself criticized for honoring an employee with a “Most Original Costume” award who was wearing a controversial costume at ICE’s Halloween party.
Back to Top


11. Target and Whole Foods Market Charged with Discriminating Against Immigrant Workers

The Legal Aid Society – Employment Law Center (LAS-ELC) recently filed two employment discrimination charges with the Department of Justice against the Target Corporation and Whole Foods Market, alleging that the companies illegally fired and suspended, respectively, two immigrant workers, even though they had presented clear evidence of their authorization to work in the U.S. Target allegedly terminated an employee who is authorized to work under Temporary Protected Status (TPS), and Whole Foods allegedly suspended for 30 days without pay an employee who is a naturalized U.S. citizen.

“The facts could not show more clearly that both Target and Whole Foods Market engaged in classic document abuse, and our clients have suffered the harsh consequences of such illegality,” said Carole Vigne, a Skadden Fellow with the LAS-ELC.

The LAS-ELC’s announcement is available at http://www.las-elc.org/whatsnew.html.

Back to Top


12. State Dept. Issues Final Passport Rule

The Department of State has issued a final rule that reorganizes, restructures, and updates passport regulations. The Department said it issued the rule “to make [the regulations] easier for users to access information, to better reflect current practice and changes in statutory authority, and to remove outdated provisions.” In general, the Department said, the revisions do not mark a departure from current policy. Rather, the Department’s intent is “to bring greater clarity to current passport policy and practice and to present it in a less cumbersome way.”

The final rule, which includes comments and responses, is available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/pdf/E7-22461.pdf. Because issues regarding passport fees and the passport card are addressed in a separate rulemaking, the Department said it will respond to comments on those issues at a later time.

Back to Top


13. China, India Second Preference Cut-Off Dates Retrogress; Other Projections

The Department of State’s Visa Office announced in the latest Visa Bulletin that the China-mainland born and India employment second preference cut-off dates both will retrogress in December. The Department said the retrogression is a direct result of extraordinarily heavy applicant demand for numbers, primarily by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services offices for adjustment-of-status cases. Additional retrogressions cannot be ruled out during the second quarter of the fiscal year, which begins in January 2008, the Department noted.

The Department also made the following projections based on current demand patterns, which could change. “Under no circumstances should they be used as a basis for making any formal plans prior to the announcement of the monthly cut-off dates,” the Department warned.

  • Employment Preferences – Worldwide and Philippines:

First and second preferences: Will remain Current.

Third: Slow forward movement should be possible while demand patterns are established.

Third “Other Workers” category (all countries): Little if any forward movement is expected at this time. If the current demand pattern continues, it may be necessary to retrogress the cut-off date at some point later in the fiscal year.

  • Employment Preferences – China-mainland born and India:

First: Continued heavy demand may require the establishment of a cut-off date at some point during the fiscal year.

Second: Demand during October and the first week of November has already used over 38 percent of the annual limit. It is hoped that the December retrogressions will return monthly number use within the target range. If not, further retrogressions cannot be ruled out.

The Visa Bulletin for December 2007 is available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3841.html.

Back to Top


14. Japan Begins Fingerprinting, Photographing Foreign Visitors

Japan has begun fingerprinting and photographing foreign visitors under new anti-terror legislation approved by Japan’s upper house of parliament. Those refusing to comply will be denied admission into Japan and will be returned to their port of origin. The European Business Council in Japan and the Australian and New Zealand Chamber of Commerce in Japan sent a letter in October to the Justice Ministry expressing concerns about the new requirement. The letter is available at http://www.ebc-jp.com/news/2007Oct%20Letter%20to%20Immigration%20Bureau%20E.pdf.
Back to Top


15. New Publications and Items of Interest

SEVIS Issues Quarterly Review. The Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS) “General Data Quarterly Review” provides a snapshot of information intended for a variety of SEVIS stakeholders. The latest edition of the review includes information presented in charts and graphs from SEVIS data collected on October 1, 2007.

As of October 1, 2007, there were 1,045,918 active nonimmigrant students, exchange visitors, and their dependents in SEVIS. Data on schools, exchange visitor programs, and more than 4.7 million F, J, and M nonimmigrant visa international students and their dependents can be found in SEVIS.

The latest quarterly report is available at: http://www.ice.gov/doclib/sevis/pdf/quarterly_report_sept07.pdf.

DHS Releases Immigration Statistics. Updated immigration statistics are available on the Department of Homeland Security’s Web site. Available reports include information on temporary admissions of nonimmigrants to the U.S., data on naturalizations and legal permanent residents, the 2006 Yearbook of Immigration Statistics, and other topics.

The statistical reports are available at http://www.dhs.gov/ximgtn/statistics/.

Back to Top


16. Recent News from ABIL Members

Mark Ivener (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-ivener.cfm) and Cyrus D. Mehta (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-mehta.cfm) recently authored “Green Cards Through Investment.” The article discusses opportunities under the little-known EB-5 investor visa. It is available at http://www.cyrusmehta.com/news.aspx?SubIdx=ocyrus2007101911523.

Steve Garfinkel (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-garfinkel.cfm) presented on business immigration law issues at “Exposing the Dilemma: A Discussion of the Moral and Legal Complexities of U.S. Immigration Laws.” The forum, held at St. Peter’s Catholic Church on October 9, included Mr. Garfinkel’s discussion on the obligations of U.S. employers under U.S. immigration laws, the obstacles facing U.S. employers who seek to employ foreign labor legally, and the dilemmas of U.S. employers who are concerned about securing their existing workforce. Mr. Garfinkel will speak at The Employer’s Association (http://www.employersassoc.com) on January 30, 2008, regarding the newly revised I-9 employment verification form. Topics will include the proper completion of the form, the differences between the old and new versions, and the current situation regarding social security mismatch letters.

H. Ronald Klasko (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-klasko.cfm) will speak at the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) New York Chapter Immigration Symposium in New York on December 13, 2007. He spoke at the New Jersey Institute for Continuing Legal Education Annual Immigration Conference in Newark, New Jersey, on November 14, 2007, where he discussed advanced corporate immigration law issues. Additionally, Mr. Klasko addressed the American Bar Association on November 9 at its Labor and Employment Law Conference in Philadelphia. Mr. Klasko’s presentation, “Advising Employers in the Era of Worksite Enforcement,” included topics such as the social security “no match” regulation, areas of potential employer liabilities, and advising employers regarding ICE workplace raids and I-9 compliance issues. Mr. Klasko also participated on two panels at the NAFSA Region VIII conference in Baltimore, Maryland, on November 8. One panel focused on visa issues for post-doctoral candidates; Mr. Klasko discussed appropriate visas for postdoctoral researchers and fellows and led a discussion of employer-sponsored and self-sponsored permanent residence applications. The second panel centered on how to deal with government adjudication delays, where Mr. Klasko offered possible remedies including litigation options (mandamus). Mr. Klasko’s recently authored article, “Litigation to Challenge Agency Delays: Frequently Asked Questions,” was presented at several conferences, including several NAFSA regional programs. This article is in question and answer format, and addresses mandamus filing concerns and issues. Mr. Klasko’s latest publication, “Employment Options for Foreign Nationals in the U.S.: Overview of U.S. Immigration Process,” was published in connection with the American Bar Association conference on November 9, in Philadelphia. For more information or to request presentation materials on any of the above events, e-mail Mr. Klasko at [email protected].

The Cornell Alumni Magazine has published an article about the asylum law clinic that Stephen Yale-Loehr (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-loehr.cfm) co-directs at Cornell Law School. “Many people don’t realize that, unlike in criminal cases, there’s no constitutional right to counsel in immigration proceedings,” says Mr. Yale-Loehr. “But too often in our immigration system, the most complex cases involve the people who can least afford a lawyer.” The asylum law clinic works to help close that gap. The article is online at http://cornellalumnimagazine.com/Currentissue/features/Feature2.asp.

Steve Clark (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-clark.cfm) addressed the Boston Bar Association Foreign Lawyer’s Committee with a presentation on Visa Options for Foreign Lawyers. Mr. Clark discussed some of the difficulties lawyers have in obtaining labor certification due to difficulties encountered obtaining licensure and the rather subjective process law firms use in recruiting and hiring lawyers. Flynn and Clark will be hosting a Breakfast Briefing for clients and friends on I-9 and Related Immigration Enforcement Issues after the first of the year. For more information or to request presentation materials, please e-mail Steve Clark at sclark@flynnclark.

News from Angelo Paparelli (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-paparelli.cfm):

  • Mr. Paparelli will speak on January 17, 2008, at 4:45 pm for the India Legal Process Outsourcing Summit at the Grand Hyatt, New York City. Mr. Paparelli, with another noted attorney, will address the topic of “Best Practices for the Ongoing Management of the Outsourcing Arrangement.” For more information, go to http://americanconference.com/Law_Firm_Management/LPO.htm.
  • Susan Wehrer spoke December 3, 2007, on “HR Issues for the Mobil Workforce” at the 2007 International Tax and Business Conference in San Francisco, California. For more information, go to: http://www.entertheusa.com/events/0711_hrissues.pdf.
  • Mr. Paparelli will speak at the Investors Visas Workshop on “EB-5 and E-2 Risk Management for Foreign Investors and Immigration Lawyers” on Friday, December 7, 2007, in New York City. For more information, go to: http://www.entertheusa.com/events/0711_investorsvisa.pdf.
  • Andrew Lerner will speak on “Panel Covering Department of Labor Issues” at AILA’s 10th Annual New York Chapter Immigration Law Symposium on December 13, 2007. For more information, go to: http://www.entertheusa.com/events/0711_laborissues.pdf.

Articles Mr. Paparelli was quoted in:

  • Workforce Management Magazine in “DHS Rule Blocked.” To view excerpts of article quotes, the article and related article links, go to: http://www.entertheusa.com/news.html#news26.
  • Aventura Magazine in “Lost in the Shadows Part II, Why America’s Affluent, Successful Illegal Immigrants Deserve our Help,” November Issue. For a synopsis of quotes and a link to the article, go to: http://www.entertheusa.com/news.html#news25.

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2007-12-01 00:00:342019-09-18 03:20:17News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 3, No. 12 • December 01, 2007

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 3, No. 11 • November 01, 2007

November 01, 2007/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. Backlogged Immigration Cases ‘Could Take Years’ to Process, USCIS Says; No Forward Movement of Cut-Off Dates – USCIS faces huge backlogs because of fee changes combined with confusion over the cut-off date for employment-based applications.

2. Talent Pool Increasingly Global: EU Blue Cards Proposed, Migrant Policy Web Site Launched – Will the European Union and other countries’ aggressive recruitment strategies leave the U.S. behind in the dust?

3. USCIS Streamlines Readmission for Certain H and L Adjustment Applicants – The rule removes the requirement that such persons present a receipt notice for their adjustment applications when returning to the U.S. from travel abroad.

4. Labor Dept. Cracks Down on PERM Fraud, Increases Audits – The risks are high for both employers and attorneys.

5. Court Issues Preliminary Injunction on No-Match Letter Rule – The court noted that the planned mailing of the no-match letters and accompanying DHS guidance would have resulted in the “termination of employment to lawfully employed workers.”

6. Congressional Roundup: H-1Bs, Seasonal Workers, Dream Act – Various immigration-related measures are being considered or have been rejected.

7. H-2B Half-Year Cap Reached – USCIS has received a sufficient number of petitions to reach the congressionally mandated H-2B cap for the first half of fiscal year 2008.

8. DHS, New York Reach Agreement on Enhanced Driver?s License – Gov. Spitzer noted that two types of licenses would be issued, federal and non-federal.

9. USCIS Announces H-2A Centralized Filing Location – Ø USCIS has established a unit dedicated to processing H-2A petitions at the California Service Center.

10. GAO Report Released: Removal Decisions – The GAO recommended that ICE update its guidance and ensure that officers are provided timely information on legal developments affecting their decisions.

11. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members


Details:

1. Backlogged Immigration Cases ‘Could Take Years’ to Process, USCIS Says; No Forward Movement of Cut-Off Dates

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services faces a large backlog of immigration cases because of fee changes that led to a rush in applications filed in advance of the increases, combined with confusion over the cut-off date for employment-based change or adjustment of status applications. The latter confusion, the Daily Labor Reportnoted, was caused by an announcement effective July 2 and rescinded two weeks later by the Department of State’s Visa Office that employment-based visa numbers were no longer available for the remainder of the fiscal year. Michael Aytes, USCIS’s Associate Director for Domestic Operations, was quoted in the Report as noting that USCIS received over 2.5 million applications during July and August, including 300,000 employment-based adjustment applications. “It could take years to process all of the applications and issue all the visas,” Mr. Aytes said. The Report noted that applicants have some protection in the form of more portability for their current visas, allowing them to change jobs more easily. Mr. Aytes said that USCIS is considering some streamlining measures to speed things up, including the possibility of handling specific industries within a single USCIS office that is familiar with the unique demands of that industry, similar to what has already been done for sports teams.Mr. Aytes also said that USCIS doesn’t want a repeat of last year’s H-1B debacle, where the H-1B numerical limit for fiscal year 2008 was met the first day applications were received, resulting in a lot of wasted time on preparing and processing applications that went nowhere. “While there was a significant use of resources by USCIS, I am even more concerned about the time and effort used [by employers] in preparing the applications,” he said. USCIS is considering a pre-registration option that would allow the filing of a more limited application, with the remaining portions to be filed if the applicant succeeds. Mr. Aytes added that he wants “to do everything I can to dissuade” employers from filing multiple petitions for one worker based on different criteria.Meanwhile, the Visa Bulletin for November 2007 reports that there has been no forward movement of the employment cut-off dates. “The reason for this is that it is still too early to see what impact the movement of the cut-off dates toward the end of FY 2007 may have on demand,” the Department noted. Depending on the rate of demand being received from USCIS offices for adjustment of status cases, some forward movement of dates may be possible for December. The Bulletin is available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3827.html.Contact your Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers member for guidance in specific situations.
Back to Top


2. Talent Pool Increasingly Global: EU Blue Cards Proposed, Migrant Policy Web Site Launched

Will the European Union (EU) and other countries’ aggressive recruitment strategies leave the U.S. behind in the dust? Robert Hoffman of Oracle warned that could be the case if the U.S. continues down its current discouraging path. With the proposed EU “blue card” for highly skilled workers looming on the horizon, Mr. Hoffman noted in the October 25, 2007, edition of Information Week that “[t]he competition for talent is truly global” and that the EU “clearly recognizes the challenges of an aging population and that highly talented individuals are job generators.” Franco Frattini, European Commissioner for Justice, Freedom, and Security, said in a speech at the London School of Economics that it is essential for the EU to “become a real magnet for highly skilled immigrants.”

The proposed renewable EU blue card would allow workers to live and work in an EU nation for three years after an application process taking three months, and would allow them to bring their immediate families. Technology companies are likely to invest and expand wherever it is easier for tech employees to work, Mr. Hoffman said, noting that “[t]he competition for talent is truly global.” Hoffman said that “if the U.S. immigration policy continues on this path, what choice do we have” but to begin looking elsewhere to expand its options.

A recent graduate of Cornell University who has accepted a postdoctoral stint at the National Institutes of Health commented, “I certainly can’t put my life on hold for another 5 to 10 years waiting for a green card, and most definitely cannot live permanently in this toxic anti-immigrant environment.” Another said, “I have recently been transferred to the USA by my company. I can see the red tape and the 10-year wait to get a green card. I don’t have the patience or inclination to stay past my initial visa when I can work anywhere in Europe by virtue of my EU passport. The red tape here, and the abrasiveness towards foreigners in general, make this an unattractive place to be.”

Leonard Lynn, a professor of management policy at Case Western Reserve University, and Harold Salzman, a sociologist and senior research associate at the Urban Institute in Washington, D.C., recently authored “The Real Global Technology Challenge” for Change magazine. They recently asked a class of 80 engineering and science graduates in India how many wanted to go to the U.S. A decade ago, the authors said, almost every hand would have gone up. But now, nobody raised their hand. “Why go to the U.S. when all the opportunity is in India?” the Indian graduates suggested. The authors also noted that Chinese managers they met who had received U.S. degrees were choosing to return to China rather than stay in the U.S., as they had previously planned to do, because opportunities in China were becoming more appealing.

The authors believe that the U.S. is “no longer the universally preferred home for the global technology elite,” observing that increasing numbers of scientists and engineers who were educated and have built successful careers in the U.S. are returning to China, India, and other countries, and that many in the younger generation are simply not coming to the U.S. in the first place. Noting these trends, the authors note that “the policy and technology communities are sounding the alarm about an impending U.S. fall from scientific and technological dominance.” The declining appeal of science and engineering for American students is compounding the problem, the authors argue, while the numbers of engineers and scientists trained in China and India continue to rise. A summary of this article is available at http://www.heldref.org/change/feas1.php.

Meanwhile, the British Council and Migration Policy Group, leading a consortium of 25 organizations, has launched a Web site, the Migrant Integration Policy Index (MIPEX), which measures policies to integrate migrants in 25 European Union (EU) Member States and three non-EU countries. MIPEX, which is co-financed by the EU, uses over 100 policy indicators to create a multi-dimensional picture of migrants’ opportunities to participate in European societies. MIPEX covers six policy areas that shape a migrant’s journey to full citizenship: labor market access, family reunion, long-term residence, political participation, access to nationality, and anti-discrimination. The site includes country profiles and an interactive mapping and charting function.

Over the coming months, the MIPEX Group will host a series of “launch debates” in various European cities. Information on the debates is available at http://www.integrationindex.eu/events/. MIPEX, and abridged versions of the study, will be available in a number of languages, including English, French, Spanish, German and Polish. MIPEX is available at http://www.integrationindex.eu/.

Back to Top


3. USCIS Streamlines Readmission for Certain H and L Adjustment Applicants

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) published a final rule on November 1, 2007, to streamline the readmission of certain H and L nonimmigrants who have applied for adjustment of status to become permanent residents. The rule removes the requirement that such persons present a receipt notice (Form I-797, Notice of Action) for their adjustment applications when returning to the U.S. from travel abroad.H-1 nonimmigrants affected by this rule include those under the H-1B classification for specialty occupation workers and the H-1C classification for certain registered nurses. L-1 nonimmigrants affected by this rule include those under the L-1A classification for certain intracompany transferees who are managers or executives, and the L-1B classification for specialized knowledge workers. Dependents of affected H-1s and L-1s, who are admitted as H-4s and L-2s, are also relieved of the receipt requirement.USCIS also noted that H-1 and L-1 nonimmigrants (and their H-4 or L-2 dependents) are now exempt from the advance parole requirement. Previously, they were required to present a receipt for their adjustment application at the time of readmission to the U.S. following foreign travel. The final rule eliminates the “unnecessary burden” of presenting this receipt, USCIS said, because the information in the receipt is in USCIS databases available to immigration inspectors and adjudicators. Upon application for readmission to the U.S., they still must provide evidence to a U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Inspector at the port of entry that they are:· Still eligible for H-1 or L-1 status,· Coming to resume employment with the same employer for whom they were previously employed, and· In possession of a valid H-1 or L-1 visa, if required.In the case of H-4 or L-2 dependents, the spouse or parent through whom they received their H-4 or L-2 status must meet the above requirements and the dependent must remain eligible for admission in H-4 or L-2 classification.The full text of the final rule is available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/pdf/E7-21506.pdf.
Back to Top


4. Labor Dept. Cracks Down on PERM Fraud, Increases Audits

In response to the Department of Labor’s final rule, effective July 16, 2007, requiring, among other things, that employers pay the costs of applications filed under the Program Electronic Review Management (PERM) program, Catherine L. Haight, a Los Angeles-based immigration attorney, said the risks are high for both employers and attorneys and that the Department would not hesitate to enforce the rule. She was quoted in the Daily Labor Report as noting that “[t]hey are taking this rule very seriously and are willing to consider any attempt to get around the rule as fraud.” Others suggested that the Department would seek out employers and attorneys as examples and conduct more audits of the rationale for applications to show they are serious about rooting out fraud. On the positive side, wait times have been reduced drastically. Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers (ABIL) member firms report increasingly frequent audits, often conducted on a random basis. Sources at the Department have confirmed this trend. If audit frequency continues to climb, processing times will climb once again. ABIL will monitor this situation with the agency closely and report as further news emerges.The Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers (ABIL) advises filing PERM applications with great care. Contact your ABIL member for guidance.
Back to Top


5. Court Issues Preliminary Injunction on No-Match Letter Rule

On October 10, 2007, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued a preliminary injunction in AFL-CIO, et al. v. Chertoff, et al. (N.D. Cal. Case No. 07-CV-4472 CRB). The preliminary injunction enjoins and restrains the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Social Security Administration (SSA) from implementing the final rule, “Safe-Harbor Procedures for Employers Who Receive a No-Match Letter.” Plaintiffs are a consortium of labor and business groups. The court said the balance of hardships “tips sharply in plaintiffs’ favor” and that plaintiffs have “raised serious issues going to the merits.” The court noted that the planned mailing of the no-match letters and accompanying DHS guidance under the final rule, within the timeline allotted, would have resulted in the “termination of employment to lawfully employed workers” because there are numerous errors in the SSA records, and that the “threat of criminal prosecution” represents a major change in DHS policy. Approximately eight million workers would have been affected, and the letters would have gone to about 140,000 employers. The preliminary injunction does not preclude the SSA from sending out its traditional no-match letters without the final rule language.The preliminary injunction is available at http://www.nilc.org/immsemplymnt/SSA_Related_Info/no-match_PI_order_2007-10-10.pdf.
Back to Top


6. Congressional Roundup: H-1Bs, Seasonal Workers, Dream Act

The Senate recently passed legislation that would increase the H-1B education and training fee to $5,000 and allocate some previously unused green card numbers to nurses and physical therapists upon payment of a $1,500 fee. The House and Senate are now negotiating in conference the details of the legislation, which is part of Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 2008. Reportedly, the fee hike and nurse allocations were removed in conference. The fee increase was intended to fund additional scholarships for American students in mathematics, technology, and health care fields. Compete America said the tripling of the H-1B fee would make the H-1B program cost-prohibitive, especially for smaller businesses, but some IT workers’ groups countered that it would help to prevent displacement of U.S. workers for lower-paid foreign workers. The Wall Street Journal pointed out in an editorial published on November 2, 2007, that in addition to the hiring fee, current law already requires H-1B professionals to be paid the higher of the prevailing wage or actual wage paid to U.S. workers in similar positions. “So it’s not as if U.S. businesses pursue foreign engineers, computer scientists and the like because they’re cheaper to employ. Nor are these foreign workers overrunning the country and displacing Americans. In 2006, new H-1B professionals comprised 0.07 percent of the labor force.” As noted last month, a newly introduced bill, the “Save Our Small and Seasonal Businesses Act of 2007,” would continue to exempt returning seasonal workers from an annual numerical limit of 66,000, after the exemption’s expiration on September 30, 2007. This legislation, introduced by Sens. Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.) and John Warner (R-Va.), is supported by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and various business organizations. Also, the Senate rejected, 52 to 44, the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors (Dream) Act, which would have provided undocumented children who were brought to the U.S. before the age of 16 with a path to permanent residence if they served in the military or completed two years of higher education. Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.), a supporter of the bill, said that “to turn on these children and treat them as criminals is an indication of the level of emotion and, in some cases, bigotry and hatred that is involved in this debate.”
Back to Top


7. H-2B Half-Year Cap Reached

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on October 1, 2007, that it had received a sufficient number of petitions to reach the congressionally mandated H-2B cap for the first half of fiscal year 2008. USCIS established September 27, 2007, as the “final receipt date” for new H-2B worker petitions requesting employment start dates before April 1, 2008. The final receipt date is the date on which USCIS determines that it has received enough cap-subject petitions to reach the limit of 33,000 H-2B workers for the first six months of FY 2008. Under current law, USCIS noted, a returning worker who was counted toward the H-2B numerical limit during FYs 2004, 2005 or 2006 was exempt from being counted against the FY 2007 H-2B cap. USCIS noted that Congress has not yet reauthorized or extended the returning worker provisions for FY 2008. Absent such reauthorization or extension, USCIS must count all petitions requesting H-2B workers for new employment with an employment start date of October 1, 2007, or later toward the FY 2008 H-2B cap. USCIS will apply a computer-generated random selection process to all petitions that are subject to the cap and were received on September 27, 2007. Petitions for workers who are currently in H-2B status do not count toward the congressionally mandated bi-annual H-2B cap. USCIS will continue to process petitions filed to extend the stay of a current H-2B worker in the United States; change the terms of employment for current H-2B workers and extend their stay; or allow current H-2B workers to change or add employers and extend their stay. The announcement is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/H2B_1oct07.pdf.
Back to Top


8. DHS, New York Reach Agreement on Enhanced Driver?s License

Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff and New York’s Governor Eliot Spitzer jointly announced on October 27, 2007, that New York and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) have reached an agreement to launch a program to issue an “enhanced” driver’s license in accordance with security concerns and provisions of the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative and the REAL ID Act. Secretary Chertoff said the enhanced license will “help ensure the security of New York’s northern border” and ensure economic vitality. He said that the DHS hopes to announce a final regulation shortly “that provides a sensible solution from a cost, convenience and privacy perspective.” Gov. Spitzer noted that “[g]iven that as a result of the expected final REAL ID regulations that we understand will address our previous concerns, New York’s license will already be close to compliance with the new federal requirements. So we now believe we can implement both REAL ID and our policy change at the same time.” In response to questions about whether the new license would be issued to undocumented individuals, Gov. Spitzer noted that two types of licenses would be issued. “[T]he only difference between the REAL ID license and the non-REAL ID license, federal versus the non-federal, will be the demarcation in print that will say, on the non-REAL ID license, ‘Not valid for federal identification.’ ” The latter, he said, would not allow the licensee to board a plane or cross the border — in short, to do anything other than drive.Meanwhile, Sen. Hillary Clinton’s remarks during the debate in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on October 30, 2007, about allowing undocumented persons to obtain a New York driver’s license produced heated exchanges with the other candidates. The driver’s license issue, and immigration in general, are expected to be a highlight of the upcoming presidential campaign, said commentator Chris Matthews. Stay tuned.The DHS-New York announcement is available at http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1193749447502.shtm.
Back to Top


9. USCIS Announces H-2A Centralized Filing Location

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has established a unit dedicated to processing H-2A petitions at the California Service Center (CSC). The CSC has established mailing addresses for all H-2A filings. Effective today, H-2A petitioners are encouraged to use the addresses listed in the announcement for all H-2A petitions( this change will become mandatory once USCIS publishes a notice in the Federal Register). The announcement, which contains additional advice about filing H-2A petitions, is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/H2AUpdate17Oct07.pdf.
Back to Top


10. GAO Report Released: Removal Decisions

In a new Government Accountability Office (GAO) report, “Immigration Enforcement: ICE Could Improve Controls to Help Guide Alien Removal Decision Making,” the GAO found that the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has begun to update and enhance training curricula to better support officer decision-making but that the agency has not taken steps to ensure that written guidance to promote the appropriate exercise of discretion during apprehension and removal is comprehensive and up to date and has not established time frames for updating guidance. For example, the GAO noted, field operational manuals have not been updated to provide information about the appropriate exercise of discretion in light of a recent expansion of ICE worksite enforcement and fugitive operations, in which officers are more likely to encounter persons with humanitarian issues or who are not targets of investigations. Also, ICE does not have a mechanism to ensure the timely dissemination of information on legal developments that would enable officers to make decisions in line with the most recent interpretations of immigration law. As a result, the GAO said, ICE officers are “at risk of taking actions that do not support operational objectives and making removal decisions that do not reflect the most recent legal developments.” The GAO recommended that ICE update its guidance to include factors officers should consider when making apprehension and removal decisions and establish time frames for this task; ensure that officers are provided timely information on legal developments affecting their decisions; and evaluate the costs and alternatives for developing a mechanism to analyze officer decision-making systematically. The Department of Homeland Security agreed and identified actions ICE plans to take to implement the GAO’s recommendations. The report, GAO-08-67, is available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d0867.pdf.
Back to Top


11. Recent News from ABIL Members

Stephen Yale-Loehr (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-loehr.cfm) was quoted recently in the Wall Street Journal (October 11, 2007 edition) regarding the Department of Homeland Security’s controversial final rule issued on September 14, 2007, and temporarily blocked by a federal judge, concerning no-match letters from the Social Security Administration (SSA) and employment verification. Mr. Yale-Loehr noted that “[i]f you read the fine print [of the judge’s decision], it doesn’t mean the new rule can’t go forward. It means the government must do a better job of determining its impact on business before it can republish the rule.” Mr. Yale-Loehr also noted, in the October 9, 2007, edition of the Financial Times, that “[t]he Department of Homeland Security went too far in trying to promulgate rules to curb illegal immigration in the workplace when really Congress has to resolve the issue.” Finally, on the topic of EB-5 investor visas, Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted in the November 2, 2007, edition of the Wall Street Journal: “The EB-5 program is one of the most complex and heavily scrutinized immigration programs. Investors must show every cent was earned legally.” For more information on Mr. Yale-Loehr’s practice, see http://www.millermayer.com/.

Cyrus Mehta (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-mehta.cfm)and Bernard Wolfsdorf (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-wolfsdorf.cfm)recently spoke in New York City at the Practising Law Institute’s October 9-10, 2007, Immigration and Naturalization Institute, “Ethics in Immigration Practice.” Mr. Wolfsdorf spoke on “Crossing the Border and Getting Your Visa,” including security checks, communications between posts and entry points, a US-VISIT update, working with changes in circumstances after approval of USCIS petitions, and unique issues with Canada and Mexico. Mr. Mehta spoke on “Ethics in Immigration Practice,” including unique representation issues; differing views on state licensing and federal practice; retainers, engagement letters and use of client funds; and emerging challenges and security issues.

Mark Ivener (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-ivener.cfm) was quoted in the September/October 2007 issue of Aventura Magazine in “Lost in the Shadows: The Remarkable Untold Story of America’s Affluent Illegal Immigrants.” The article is in two parts; Part II appears in the November issue. Mr. Ivener said that in addition to the usual story about poor Mexicans in America, “[t]here is another story about the many thousands – we don’t know how many – affluent people who are here, but are caught in the maze and are more underground than the illegals we can identify and measure.” For more on Aventura, see http://aventuramagazine.com/.

Angelo Paparelli (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-paparelli.cfm)was quoted in Part II of the Aventura article noted above: “We just don’t have a logical system that encourages entrepreneurship under our immigration laws right now. And by entrepreneurship, I’m not only talking about people who can invest $500,000 or $1 million under the existing programs. I’m talking about people who have the ability and energy to work very hard and very intelligently to start a new business. The lifeblood of the American economy is not the Fortune 500. It is the small businesses.” He also noted that “if we cannot get enough visas for highly skilled professionals who have been recruited by employers like Microsoft from overseas, to find the best and the brightest, then where is the political will to help people who are here illegally, even if they are entrepreneurs? Where is the upside in discussing them?”

Mr. Paparelli spoke on November 8, 2007, at the NAFSA Region XII Conference, San Francisco, on “Immigration Miracle Cures for Out-of-Status Students, Scholars and Faculty.” His upcoming speaking engagements include “Best Practices for the Ongoing Management of the Outsourcing Arrangement, January 17, 2008, at the India LPO Summit/Outsourcing Legal Services Offshore, New York; and “Issues Arising from the Employment of Authorized and Unauthorized Foreign Workers,” March 29, 2008, at the National Conference on EEO Law, Tucson, Arizona.

Steve Clark (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-clark.cfm) will address the Boston Bar Association Foreign Lawyers Committee on visa options for foreign lawyers on November 27, 2007. He will analyze the peculiar problems foreign lawyers face due to barriers to licensure, the wide range of lawyer wages, and the qualitative selection process used by law firms. He also is scheduled to speak on immigration impact of mergers, acquisitions and reorganizations on December 4, 2007. For further information, see http://www.bostonbar.org/sc/il/iml/index.htm.

Laura Danielson (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-danielson.cfm) spoke on “Immigration Compliance in the Global Arena” at the International Bar Association’s conference in Singapore in October. She will be speaking in a panel discussion on “Hot Tips for the Future” at the IBA’s 3rd Biennial Global Immigration Conference in London, England, on November 15-16, 2007. Nita Upadhye, Kehrela Hodkinson’s partner, also will speak on a panel at the London conference. Ms. Hodkinson (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-hodkinson.cfm) has been integrally involved in organizing a Rome District Chapter of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) and is acting as the Interim Chair. The first Rome District AILA meeting will be held during the IBA/AILA Conference. “We have also hosted a cocktail reception at the IBA Singapore on behalf of ABIL Global and will be hosting another cocktail reception for ABIL Global during the upcoming IBA/AILA immigration conference in London,” Ms. Hodkinson noted. For more on the London conference, see http://www.ibanet.org/images/downloads/confs/ImmigrationLondonNov.pdf.

Francis Chin (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-chin.cfm) will be speaking at the Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education BasicsPlus! Immigration Law seminar in Boston, Massachusetts, on November 13, 2007, on Employment-Based Immigrant Visas.Angelo Paparelli co-authored “Despite Court Setback on No-Match Rule, Homeland Security’s Outsourcing of Immigration Enforcement Gains Momentum,” which was published in the October 22, 2007, edition of the New York Law Journal.

Mr. Paparelli, who is the president of the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers (ABIL), replaces Stephen Yale-Loehr as an immigration law columnist for the NYLJ. Mr. Yale-Loehr, a prominent immigration lawyer, co-founder of ABIL, and adjunct professor at Cornell University Law School who has co-authored the column for the past 10 years, nominated Mr. Paparelli, and the NYLJ confirmed the selection. Mr. Paparelli will co-author his columns with Ted Chiappari.

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2007-11-01 00:00:282019-09-18 23:47:06News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 3, No. 11 • November 01, 2007

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 3, No. 10 • October 01, 2007

October 01, 2007/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. U.S. Adds Photo Verification, Sues Illinois on Verification Ban; Towns Rethink Anti-Illegal Laws – The photo tool will be available when a new employee presents an EAD or green card to complete the I-9.

2. USCIS Announces New Naturalization Test -The revised test emphasizes fundamental concepts of American democracy, U.S. history, and the rights and responsibilities of citizenship.

3. DV-2009 Lottery Application Period Begins – Entries for the DV-2009 diversity visa lottery must be submitted electronically between noon EDT, October 3, 2007, and noon EST, December 2, 2007.

4. Passports Now Required for Travel Within Western Hemisphere – The temporary Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative accommodation allowing U.S. citizens to travel by air within the Western Hemisphere using a Department of State proof of passport application receipt has ended.

5. IJs, Border Agents Google Applicants’ Names, Attorneys Warn – Some have been detained at the border or denied entry as a result.

6. U.S. Passport Services Back to Standard Processing Time, State Dept. Says – The Department announced that it has restored passport service to the standard six- to eight-week processing time for routine passport applications.

7. DED Extended for Liberians – The 18-month DED extension period expires on March 31, 2009.

8. New York Considers Proposal to Allow Driver’s Licenses Without Social Security Cards – New York’s Governor Eliot Spitzer has proposed allowing immigrants who reside in New York, regardless of status, to obtain driver’s licenses using foreign identity documents.

9. Lawsuit Challenges Constitutionality of ICE Raids – The suit charges that ICE agents unlawfully broke into and entered the homes of Latinos in the New York area without judicially issued warrants or other legal justification.

10. Video Debunks Immigration Myths, Calls for Reform – The American Immigration Lawyers Association has produced a video on immigration reform that challenges common myths.

Details:

1. U.S. Adds Photo Verification, Sues Illinois on Verification Ban; Towns Rethink Anti-Illegal Laws

In late September, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ E-Verify (formerly Basic Pilot) work authorization verification system added access to photographs. The photo tool will be available when a new employee presents an Employment Authorization Document (EAD) or Permanent Resident Card (green card) to complete the Employment Eligibility Verification Form (I-9). It allows an employer to compare identical photos: the individual’s photograph on the EAD or green card against the image stored in USCIS’s databases. The tool is intended to help an employer determine whether the document presented “reasonably relates to the individual presenting it” and contains a valid photo. Employers currently participating in E-Verify will be trained on the system enhancement through a mandatory refresher tutorial that launched automatically on September 17, 2007. New employers who registered after that date are learning how to use the photo tool through an updated E-Verify manual, tutorial, and memorandum of understanding.

Meanwhile, the Bush administration has sued Illinois to block a state law, to take effect January 1, 2008, that would prevent employers from using a federal database to check the work authorization of prospective employees under the E-Verify program. In a signal that the move is part of a nationwide effort, Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff said, “We will vigorously contest any effort to impede our enforcement measures.” A spokesperson for Illinois Governor Rod R. Blagojevich said he signed the bill because of concerns about delays in responding to employer inquiries and a reported 50 percent accuracy rate. More than 23,000 employers are enrolled in the system, and 2.9 million employer inquiries were handled in the most recent fiscal year.

Also, a handful of towns and cities around the nation have begun reexamining their newly passed anti-illegal immigration laws. Riverside, New Jersey, previously enacted a law to penalize anyone who employed or rented to an undocumented person. Many mostly Spanish- and Portuguese-speaking immigrants fled the town, and the local economy began to suffer. Shops and restaurants that had immigrant employees and customers began to shut down and storefronts were boarded up. The town also had mounting legal bills resulting from challenges to the law that delayed other high-priority projects. In September, Riverside rescinded the law. “I don’t think people knew there would be such an economic burden,” said Riverside’s current Mayor George Conard, who had been in favor of the original legislation. According to reports, it is unclear whether those who left will return any time soon.

A press release and fact sheet about the new photo verification capability of E-Verify are available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/EVerifyRelease25Sep07.pdf and http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/EVerifyFS25Sep07.pdf. Employers can register online for E-Verify at click here.

Back to Top

2. USCIS Announces New Naturalization Test

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has released the 100 questions and answers that comprise the civics component of the new naturalization test. USCIS will administer the new test to citizenship applicants beginning in October 2008. The revised naturalization test emphasizes fundamental concepts of American democracy, basic U.S. history, and the rights and responsibilities of citizenship, and “promote[s] patriotism among prospective citizens,” USCIS said.

Earlier this year, more than 6,000 citizenship applicants volunteered to take a pilot version of the test at 10 USCIS sites across the country, including Boston, during a four-month period. Volunteers achieved a 92.4 percent overall pass rate on the first try, USCIS noted. The pass rate on the current test is 84 percent, which includes the wider universe of test-takers who did not volunteer for the pilot test. The 100 new civics items on the new naturalization test were selected after USCIS, a panel of history and government scholars, and English as a Second Language (ESL) teachers conducted a review of their responses to the 142 items on the pilot test. Following the pilot, USCIS refined the questions and answers, dropped several and adjusted others to increase clarity, and conducted a second review, eventually narrowing the list to the new 100 questions. The range of acceptable answers to questions will increase so that applicants may learn more about a topic and select from a wider range of responses.

ABIL member Steve Clark reports that in Boston few clients had difficulty with the new test format, but only those with total comfort in English elected to take the test using the new format. He comments that “it will be interesting to see the percentage passing when the new format becomes mandatory.”

The following guidelines will determine whether naturalization applicants will take the current test or the redesigned version:

If an applicant:

– Applies for citizenship before October 1, 2008, and is scheduled for his or her naturalization interview before October 1, 2008, he or she will take the current test.

– Applies before October 1, 2008, and is scheduled for his or her naturalization interview after October 1, 2008, he or she can choose totake either the current test or the redesigned version.

– Applies after October 1, 2008, he or she will take the redesigned version.

– Is scheduled for his or her naturalization interview after October 1, 2009, regardless of when he or she applied, he or she will take the redesigned version. USCIS has posted the 100 new question and answers, the reading and writing vocabulary lists, a side-by-side comparison of the current and new test, answers to frequently asked questions and other information about the new test online at http://www.uscis.gov/newtest.The related press release is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/NatzTest_27sep07.pdf.

Back to Top

3. DV-2009 Lottery Application Period Begins

Entries for the DV-2009 diversity visa lottery must be submitted electronically between noon EDT, Wednesday, October 3, 2007, and noon EST, Sunday, December 2, 2007. Applicants must use the electronic entry form at http://www.dvlottery.state.gov during the registration period. Paper entries will not be accepted. Applicants are strongly encouraged not to wait until the last week of the registration period to enter. Heavy demand may result in Web site delays. There is no fee to enter the DV lottery.For DV-2009, natives of the following countries are not eligible to apply because they sent a total of more than 50,000 immigrants to the U.S. over the period of the previous five years: Brazil, Canada, China (mainland born), Colombia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, India, Jamaica, Mexico, Pakistan, Philippines, Peru, Poland, Russia, South Korea, United Kingdom (except Northern Ireland) and its dependent territories, and Vietnam. Persons born in Hong Kong SAR, Macau SAR, and Taiwan are eligible.A computer will select individuals randomly from among all qualified entries. They will be notified by mail between May and July 2008 and will be provided further instructions, including information on fees connected with immigration to the U.S. Those selected in the random drawing are not notified by e-mail. Individuals not selected will not receive any notification. U.S. embassies and consulates will not be able to provide a list of successful entrants. Spouses and unmarried children under age 21 of successful entrants may also apply for visas to accompany or follow to join the principal applicant. DV-2009 visas will be issued between October 1, 2008, and September 30, 2009. To receive a diversity visa to immigrate to the U.S., those chosen in the random drawing must meet all eligibility requirements. Processing of entries and issuance of diversity visas to individuals and their eligible family members must occur by midnight on September 30, 2009. Several questions and options for answers have been added to the DV-2009 program to gather additional information, including the country where the applicant lives today, the highest level of education the applicant has achieved, and the term “legally separated” instead of “separated” as an option under the marital status question. Legal separation means that a court has formally declared that the applicant and his or her spouse are legally separated, and means that the spouse would not be eligible to immigrate as the applicant’s derivative.Those electing to file a DV lottery application should be aware that the State Department considers the DV application to be a petition to be reported in the standard visa application Form DS-156 (item 36). While this may be safe enough if seeking an H or L nonimmigrant visa, any others choosing to participate should seek legal advice first to see if the application will adversely impact a future visa application.

Detailed information on how to apply, eligibility requirements, and frequently asked questions is available at http://travel.state.gov/pdf/2009DVinstructions.pdf.

Back to Top

4. Passports Now Required for Travel Within Western Hemisphere

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has reminded air carriers and the traveling public that the temporary Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative (WHTI) accommodation allowing U.S. citizens to travel by air within the Western Hemisphere using a Department of State (DOS) official proof of passport application receipt has ended as scheduled at midnight on September 30, 2007. U.S. citizens who departed the country under this travel accommodation before October 1 with an official proof of passport application receipt and government-issued identification will be readmitted with these same documents if returning to the U.S. after September 30. Effective October 1, U.S. citizens traveling by air to Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean, and Bermuda must present a passport or other WHTI-compliant documentation to enter or depart from the U.S.DHS and DOS announced the temporary WHTI accommodation for air travel in June because of lengthy processing times for passport applications amid record-breaking demand.

The announcement is available at http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1188939218061.shtm.

Back to Top

5. IJs, Border Agents Google Applicants’ Names, Attorneys Warn

Immigration attorneys have reported that immigration judges, adjudicators, and border agents sometimes google (perform an Internet search) applicants’ names, even printing out items from sites like MySpace, published articles, or letters to the editor and questioning petitioners about them. Some have been detained at the border or denied entry as a result.In one incident, a Canadian psychologist attempting to enter the U.S. was reportedly detained at the border in Blaine, Washington. He was barred from entering the U.S. and told he could apply to the Department of Homeland Security for a waiver. The border guard had conducted a random Internet search and found an article published in 2001 in which the psychologist discussed his LSD use some 40 years earlier. “Admitted drug use is admitted drug use,” a spokesman for the Border Patrol said. He noted that “[a]nyone who is determined to be a drug abuser or user is inadmissible. A crime involving moral turpitude is inadmissible and one of those areas is a violation of controlled substances.” The psychologist complained to the U.S. consulate in Vancouver, which sent this reply via e-mail: “Both our countries have very similar regulations regarding issuance of visas for citizens who have violated the law. The issue here is not the writing of an article, but the taking of controlled substances. I hear from American citizens all the time who have decades-old DUI convictions who are barred from entry into Canada and who must apply for waivers. Same thing here. Waiver is the only way.”In another case, a Muslim American firefighter from Toledo, Ohio, was born in the U.S. and converted to Islam, changing his name from Edward Eugene Reed, Jr., to Zakariya Muhammad Reed. He had also spent 20 years serving in the National Guard. After visiting his wife’s family in Ontario, he has been detained at the U.S. border a number of times. He says he has been asked why he changed his name and what his faith is, and alleges that one guard muttered, “You know, we’re really too good to these detainees. We should treat them like we do in the desert. We should put a bag over their heads and zip tie their hands together.” Another agent asked him about a letter to the editor he had written in 2006 that was critical of Israel’s actions toward Lebanon and the Palestinians, as well as the U.S. invasion of Iraq. The agents would not tell him why he had been detained, Mr. Reed said, although one border agent said there was a “problem with his name.” He contacted his representative in Congress, Marcy Kaptur, whose aide, Daniel Foote, suggested the trouble may have resulted from his changing his name to a Muslim one. Rep. Kaptur wrote on his behalf to the congressional liaison at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, but despite assurances that his record has been corrected, he continues to be detained and questioned at the border.Ron Smith, a Customs and Border Protection public affairs officer based in Detroit, Michigan, said that “Customs does not practice [or] condone any kind of profiling. It’s completely against our policies. If an individual is found doing so, they would be subject to discipline, up to and including dismissal. Regarding the alleged hooding and zip-tying comment, Smith said: “That would be something we would definitely take action on. It’s not allowed. It’s not something we allow our officers to say.”An article detailing Mr. Reed’s experience is available at http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/05/10/1088/.For more on the incident involving the Canadian psychologist, see http://select.nytimes.com/2007/05/14/us/14bar.html.

Back to Top

6. U.S. Passport Services Back to Standard Processing Time, State Dept. Says

The Department of State announced that it has restored passport service to the standard six- to eight-week processing time for routine passport applications, and to no more than three weeks for expedited service. To date, over 16 million passports have been issued in fiscal year (FY) 2007, compared with 12.1 million issued in FY 2006. The Department said it plans to expand passport facilities and to hire more passport specialists to increase production capacity and meet rising demand expected in the coming years, as passport requirements are extended to land and sea borders. By January 2008, production capacity at the National Passport Center in New Hampshire, the largest passport facility, is expected to have doubled. Longer-term expansion plans include new passport facilities around the country.The Department’s notice is available at http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2007/sep/91868.htm.

Back to Top

7. DED Extended for Liberians

Effective October 1, 2007, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has announced an 18-month automatic extension of employment authorization for Liberians (and persons without nationality who last habitually resided in Liberia) who have been provided deferred enforced departure (DED) under a memorandum sent on September 12, 2007, from President Bush to Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff. A copy of USCIS’s notice in conjunction with an employment authorization document (EAD) expiring on September 30, 2007, that was issued previously to the person as a beneficiary of temporary protected status may be accepted as evidence of a covered individual’s continued work authorization through March 31, 2009. The notice provides information on how Liberians and their employers may determine which EADs are automatically extended. The notice also provides instructions for Liberians who have DED and would like to apply for permission to travel outside the U.S. during the 18-month DED extension period, which expires on March 31, 2009.The notice is available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/07-4645.htm. A fact sheet is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/LiberiaFS_19Sep07.pdf.

Back to Top

8. New York Considers Proposal to Allow Driver’s Licenses Without Social Security Cards

New York’s Governor Eliot Spitzer has proposed allowing foreign nationals who reside in New York, regardless of status, to obtain driver’s licenses using foreign identity documents, such as passports and birth certificates, without having to present Social Security cards. The idea is to reduce the number of unlicensed, uninsured drivers while aiding law enforcement efforts by increasing the number of license records that could be used in conducting investigations. The proposal has drawn criticism from New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and others. Mayor Bloomberg said the proposal would conflict with identity document requirements. “People would need other government ID, generally a passport, and that would be a very big problem. The state’s going to have to work with the federal government in terms of having to fix that problem.” New York Senate Homeland Security Chairman Vincent Leibell (R-Brewster) said the new licensing proposal would not fly. “Just because you change a regulation doesn’t mean you change our statute,” Leibell said, referring to a 1995 law that requires New York’s driver’s license applicants to present a valid Social Security number. In most cases, New York also allows people to drive using valid foreign driver’s licenses. Additional details on the proposal and the reaction are available at http://www.ny.gov/governor/press/0921071.html. For more information on current New York driver’s license requirements for foreign nationals, see http://www.nydmv.state.ny.us/license.htm#driversfromothernations.

Back to Top

9. Lawsuit Challenges Constitutionality of ICE Raids

Several Latino families and individuals, represented by the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund and an international law firm, filed a class action suit on September 20, 2007, against the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) division of the Department of Homeland Security, charging that its agents unlawfully broke into and entered the homes of Latinos in the New York area without judicially issued warrants or other legal justification. The complaint describes armed ICE agents breaking down doors or forcing their way into Latino households in the pre-dawn hours without court warrants, terrifying children and adults, and looking for individuals who often do not even reside in the homes. A press release announcing the suit is available at http://www.prldef.org/Press/Press%20Releases/ICE/Press%20Release%20-%20Latinos%20Challenge%20Constitutionality%20of%20Home%20Raids%20Conducted%20by%20ICE.pdf. A related article is at http://jurist.law.pitt.edu:80/paperchase/2007/09/ice-sued-over-immigration-raids.php.

Back to Top

10. Video Debunks Immigration Myths, Calls for Reform

The American Immigration Lawyers Association has produced a video on immigration reform. The video debunks common myths, such as that immigrants are a drain on the economy, that Americans do not support comprehensive immigration reform, that legalizing the undocumented is unfair to those who are waiting in line, that immigration reform is really an “amnesty” program for those in the U.S. illegally, and that enforcement of existing laws is sufficient to fix the system. The video is critical of enforcement-only efforts, which the narrator and commentators say tend to drive the undocumented further underground and contribute to smuggling and fraud.The video is available at: mms://a1791.v167312.c16731.g.vm.akamaistream.net/7/1791/16731/1189998/stream-1.onstreammedia.com/cdn_stream/multivu/14574/29806_300k.wmv.

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2007-10-01 00:00:272019-09-18 23:51:29News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 3, No. 10 • October 01, 2007

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 3, No. 9 • September 01, 2007

September 01, 2007/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. DHS Issues Final Rule on Employer ‘No-Match’ Obligations; Judge Issues Temporary Restraining Order Until October 1 – The amended regulation describes the legal obligations of employers relating to the unlawful hiring or continued employment of unauthorized workers.

2. ABIL Releases Tips on Verification Compliance – Prudent employers should follow these steps to confirm that their compliance obligations under the immigration laws are fulfilled.

3. USCIS Proposes Replacement of Green Cards Without Expiration Dates – USCIS proposes to require nearly 750,000 lawful permanent residents carrying green cards without an expiration date to replace their current cards.

4. CBP Launches Online Application for Cross-Border Travel Program – Cross-border travelers wishing to apply for Nexus now are able to do so through a new, online application system.

5. California CBP Provides Tips for Mexican Students Entering the U.S. – F-1 students attending grade school, high school, or college and residing in Mexicali, Mexico, should follow these steps in advance of entry into the U.S.

6. USCIS Issues Service Center and Lockbox Receipting Update – USCIS has released information on completed data entry and receipt notices for certain applications and petitions.

7. DV-2009 Lottery Registration Period to Begin in October – The DV-2009 Lottery online entry period begins on October 3, 2007, and ends on December 2, 2007.

8. El Salvador TPS Extended – The 60-day re-registration period began August 21, 2007, and will remain in effect until October 22, 2007.

9. NCSL Releases Report on 2007 Enacted State Immigration Legislation – This online report provides a quantitative overview of introduced legislation and summarizes enacted laws relating to immigrants and refugees by state.

10. Report on Web Basic Pilot Released – Overall, most employers using the Web Basic Pilot found it to be an effective, reliable tool.

11. Recent News from ABIL Members -Recent News from ABIL Members

Details:

1. DHS Issues Final Rule on Employer ‘No-Match’ Obligations; Judge Issues Temporary Restraining Order Until October 1

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), an agency of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), issued a final rule, effective September 14, 2007, that amends the regulations relating to the unlawful hiring or continued employment of unauthorized workers. The amended regulation describes the legal obligations of an employer, under current immigration law, when the employer receives a no-match letter from the Social Security Administration (SSA) or receives a letter regarding employment verification forms from the DHS. It also describes “safe-harbor” procedures that the employer can follow in response so that the DHS “will not use the letter as any part of an allegation that the employer had constructive knowledge that the employee referred to in the letter was an alien not authorized to work” in the U.S.

Constructive knowledge. The final rule expands the current regulation’s definition of “constructive knowledge” and illustrates several situations that may lead to a finding that an employer had constructive knowledge that undocumented workers were employed. These additional examples involve an employer’s failure to take reasonable steps in response to several events: The employer receives a written notice from the Social Security Administration (such as an “Employer Correction Request,” commonly known as an employer “no-match letter”) stating that the combination of an employee’s name and Social Security number does not match SSA records, or the employer receives written notice from the DHS that the immigration status or employment authorization documentation presented or referenced by an employee in completing the I-9 verification form was not assigned to the employee according to DHS records. DHS said it “will continue to review the totality of relevant circumstances in determining if an employer had constructive knowledge that an employee was an unauthorized alien in a situation described in any of the regulation’s examples.”Safe harbor procedures. The “safe harbor” procedures that employers may follow to avoid a finding of constructive knowledge include attempting to resolve the no-match and, if it cannot be resolved within a certain period of time, verifying again the employee’s identity and employment authorization through a specified process. Safe harbor is unavailable where the employee requests visa or labor certification sponsorship and is unauthorized to work. Additionally, if the employer knows or has enough inconsistent information to suggest an employee’s ineligibility, the safe harbor provisions will not protect that employer. On the other hand, the safe-harbor steps should be completed before taking any action against the employee to avoid national origin discrimination or wrongful termination claims.

The regulation describes more specifically the “reasonable” steps that an employer might take after receiving a no-match letter. Such steps include, for example, checking its records promptly after receiving a no-match letter to determine whether the discrepancy resulted from a typographical, transcription, or similar clerical error in the employer’s records, or in its communication to the SSA or DHS. If there is such an error, DHS expects the employer to correct its records, inform the relevant agencies, verify that the name and number, as corrected, match agency records, and make a record of the manner, date, and time of the verification. ICE/DHS will consider a reasonable employer to have acted promptly if the employer takes such steps within 30 days of receipt of the no-match letter. The regulation also describes a verification procedure that the employer may follow if the discrepancy is not resolved within 90 days of receipt of the no-match letter.

Enforcement. Previously, the SSA’s position was that the no-match letters were only for informational purposes, recognizing that discrepancies could be the result of a variety of clerical errors or name changes. The no-match letters were not used for enforcement. That is expected to change, although how enforcement will look remains unclear. A DHS FAQ states, “ICE has determined that worksite enforcement investigations relating to critical infrastructure protection are among the most important. Additionally, ICE has found that simple penalties are not an effective deterrent. Therefore, ICE is looking at ways to bring significant criminal charges against businesses engaging in routine hiring of illegal aliens.”

SSA’s release of the tax year 2006 “no-match” letters will be accompanied by a letter from the DHS. SSA had planned to release the tax year 2006 “no-match” letters to employers beginning in the second week of September when the no-match regulation is due to be effective, but a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order on August 31, 2007, in response to an AFL-CIO lawsuit, and the next hearing is scheduled for October 1, so no letters are expected to be sent before October. DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff said, “They will not send all of them out at once; they’ll probably send about 15,000 out a week, over a period of probably about eight to ten weeks.” SSA expects to send out approximately 140,000 no-match letters that will cover approximately 8.9 million of the roughly 12 million total no-matches. Letters will only be sent to employers who have more than 10 employees with mismatched information, or for whom the mismatched employees represented one-half of one percent of the W-2s filed with SSAs in any given year, whichever is larger. ICE has 18 phone lines with 25 people on duty to answer questions from employers regarding the no-match rule.

Employers may verify a Social Security number by calling 1-800-772-6270 from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. EST, or online at http://www.ssa.gov/employer/ssnv.htm. Employers should keep a record of any verification. Contact your ABIL member for advice in specific situations.

Reaction. Many business and labor groups oppose the new requirements. The agricultural trade association Western Growers, for example, whose 3,000 members are responsible for about half the produce grown and shipped in the U.S., immediately issued a strongly worded statement denouncing the requirements. “We know and have told the government that much of agriculture’s workforce is falsely documented. We are one of the only industries in this country that has been forthright with the fact that much of our workforce is illegal and have pleaded with the government to pass laws to address this problem. Instead of securing a legal, stable workforce for agriculture, these rules will make it even more difficult for farmers throughout Arizona, California and the entire nation to find workers to harvest and process the crops all Americans enjoy,” said Western Growers President and CEO Tom Nassif. “In the short term, we are going to see workers fleeing their workplace just prior to the 90-day time limit and beginning anew at a different farm. This cycle could go on for a long time furthering the instability of agriculture’s workforce. Secondly, these rules could expedite the move of American farms abroad. The fact is, our food is going to be picked by a foreign workforce. The question is, will they be harvesting our food here under heavy regulation ensuring our food supply is as safe as scientifically possible, or is it going to be in places like China where regulations are, in some cases, nonexistent?” He advocated a “common-sense” system such as that proposed by the Agricultural Job Opportunities, Benefits and Security Act (AgJOBS) bill.

The full text of the final rule is available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/E7-16066.htm. A DHS FAQ is available at http://faq.ice.gov/cgi-bin/ice_faq.cfg/php/enduser/std_alp.php?p_sid=6IbfqOIi (scroll down for questions and links to answers). Information from the SSA on the no-match process for employers is available at http://www.ssa.gov/employer/noMatchNotices.htm.

Back to Top

2. ABIL Releases Tips on Verification Compliance

The Form I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verification) issued by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services must be maintained by all employers. Since November 1986, every new hire, whether a U.S. citizen or a foreign national, must complete section 1 on the first day of employment, attesting to the individual’s identity and employment eligibility. Within the first three days of hire, employers must complete section 2 of the I-9 by examining original documents of identity and employment authorization, recording the starting date of employment, noting the document numbers on the form, and certifying by signing under penalty of perjury that the documents examined appear to be genuine and relate to the employee. Employers must also refrain, however, from engaging in prohibited acts of discrimination against new hires and applicants for employment, such as basing employment decisions on citizenship or national origin status, or insisting that employees provide only specific types of identity documents or work permits.

Recently, the federal government has used the avenue of criminal law enforcement to prosecute employer violations of immigration laws. Prudent employers should follow a set of steps to confirm that their compliance obligations under the immigration laws are fulfilled. This is especially important in the post-Enron era when Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance and damage to corporate reputations are of heightened concern. This checklist can serve as a starting point for employer immigration compliance:

Current I-9s

  1. As long as no formal enforcement proceedings are pending or likely, employers should remove from their files and discard original I-9s no longer subject to the I-9 “retention rule” (I-9s may be destroyed after three years from the date of hire or one year from the date of termination, whichever is later).
  2. Employers should perform voluntary audits of all or a representative sample of retained I-9s to measure compliance practices.
  3. As a measure of good-faith compliance and to mitigate potential fines, employers should correct I-9s with errors and missing information, keeping original I-9s and initialing changes with the date of correction. Changes should be made in a separate color ink on the existing form, but employers should provide a new I-9 and keep the old one (if it is no longer subject to the retention rule) only if there is sufficient space.
  4. Employers should establish a reminder system for the timely reverification of employment eligibility for foreign employees who have time-limited work permission.
  5. Employers should take prompt action if notified by the Social Security Administration that a discrepancy exists between employer-provided records on specific workers and the agency’s own data (the so-called SSA “no-match letter”). An employer acts appropriately in this situation by checking the employer’s records, providing the employee an opportunity to seek an official correction or, if unable to verify and reconcile the discrepancy, considering (on advice of counsel) whether termination of employment is required. For details on the time requirements for such compliance efforts, see http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/E7-16066.htm.
  6. If numerous no-match letters are received, employers should consider reverifying the entire workforce but should take precautions to avoid unlawful immigration-related employment discrimination.
  7. Employers should decide whether to:
  • Copy or refrain from copying original documents of identity and employment eligibility. On the one hand, copying creates a paper trail, making it easier for the employer and the government to review prior compliance actions and for the employer to make corrections to I-9s, if required. On the other, maintaining added paperwork is burdensome and costly, and requires that employers act uniformly by copying all original documents reviewed on all employees for I-9 purposes and keeping the copies with the I-9s.
  • Maintain I-9s and required records in paper, microfiche, or electronic format. Immigration regulations now allow electronic storage and electronic signatures for I-9s. While using digital technology reduces paper storage costs, the regulations pose added requirements for assuring data integrity, facilitating audits and easing the government’s investigative burden.
  • Participate in the new U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Enforcement (ICE) programs, electronic “Basic Pilot” verification and/or “IMAGE.” The Basic Pilot allows an employer to check the employment eligibility of foreign nationals (new hires only) through the government’s immigration database. The signing of a Memorandum of Understanding is required. IMAGE is the ICE Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers, a plan for voluntary self-policing and the submission of annual immigration audits first by the government and then by qualified third-party entities. See http://www.ice.gov/partners/opaimage.

Future Hires

  1. Set up a system for handling future I-9s.
  2. Complete Section 1 of the I-9 on the first day of work for all new hires.
  3. Complete the rest of the I-9 within three days of the first day of work.
  4. Consider pre-completing the Employer’s Business Name and Address in Section 2 and pre-fill Employer Authorized Representative’s Name and Title if the same person always completes the Employer Certification.
  5. Do not accept copies of work or identity documents.
  6. Make sure all new hires complete I-9s in person before a company official (to confirm identity) or an authorized agent (with respect to whom the employer must take full responsibility for any I-9 mistakes or omissions).

Company Practices

  1. Engage in regular training for employees handling I-9 completion.
  2. Establish an I-9 routine and follow it consistently for every employee.
  3. Create a system for tracking dates of hire and terminations of employment to purge I-9s from current storage to minimize liability (assuming no actual or threatened government investigation exists or is likely).
  4. Consider establishing policies (in consultation with employment law counsel) for future compliance and ongoing voluntary audits.

See your ABIL member for help in complying with the new no-match rules and other verification requirements.

Back to Top

3. USCIS Proposes Replacement of Green Cards Without Expiration Dates

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has proposed to require nearly 750,000 lawful permanent residents carrying green cards without an expiration date to replace their current cards. The proposed rule would require lawful permanent residents to apply for a new Permanent Resident Card (Form I-551) during a 120-day filing period. USCIS said the change would allow the agency to issue more secure permanent resident cards, update cardholder information, conduct background checks, and electronically store applicants’ fingerprint and photographic information.

In August 1989, the former Immigration and Naturalization Service began issuing new cards with a 10-year expiration date and required residents to apply periodically for a new card. Between 1979 and 1989, however, the cards were issued without expiration dates. These latter cards are the subject of the proposed rule. Under the proposed rule, affected lawful permanent residents would file an Application to Replace Lawful Permanent Residence Card (Form I-90). The I-90 requires applicants to provide current biographic and biometric (photographs and fingerprint) information.

In addition to proposing a 120-day filing period, the rule also would remove all references in the regulations to outdated I-90 application procedures and correct the title and edition date of the I-90. Finally, under the rule, USCIS would be able to terminate permanent resident cards without an expiration date via notice in the Federal Register.

The full text of the proposed rule, which will remain available for public comment until September 21, 2007, is posted at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/E7-16311.htm. Information is also available in an accompanying announcement (http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/I551Replacement.pdf), fact sheet (http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/I551ReplacementFS082207.pdf) and questions-and-answers (http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/I551ReplacementQA082207.pdf).

Back to Top

4. CBP Launches Online Application for Cross-Border Travel Program

Cross-border travelers wishing to apply for Nexus now are able to do so through a new, online application system. Nexus is a frequent traveler program between the U.S. and Canada. Applicants voluntarily undergo a background check, in-person interview, and fingerprinting, and pay a $50 five-year membership fee. Under the new system, individuals may submit an online application and pay the membership fee.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Commissioner W. Ralph Basham said the program “has tremendous benefits for our law enforcement officials as well as travelers, particularly as it has been proposed as an alternative document to a passport under new document requirements, and we want to encourage new members to sign up.”

First implemented in 2000, the Nexus program has grown to include 15 lanes at 11 locations along the U.S.-Canada border, at marine reporting locations border-wide, and at five Canadian airports. The Nexus card also has been proposed as an accepted alternative to a passport under new travel document requirements, slated to go into effect for land and sea crossings as early as summer 2008. Ample advance notice and a robust public information campaign will precede full implementation of this requirement. The Nexus card is also acceptable as an alternative to a passport for air travel, a requirement that went into effect January 23, 2007.

Currently, U.S. and Canadian citizens are not required to present a passport or specific document when seeking to enter or re-enter the U.S. at land and sea crossings. CBP “highly encourages travelers to carry, at minimum, proof of citizenship such as a certified copy of your birth certificate, along with government-issued photo ID, such as a driver’s license.”

Once an applicant is notified that he or she is conditionally approved through the online Nexus account, the applicant schedules an appointment, also through the online account, to complete the interview and fingerprint process and to obtain the membership card. Approved members have access to dedicated commuter lanes, airport kiosks and telephonic marine reporting that allows expedited processing. Key benefits of the new online application system include expediting the entire application and vetting process, and streamlining the processing time for new applicants and renewals, CBP said, noting that individuals who have already mailed their application to the Canada Border Services Agency should continue with this process.

More than 133,000 travelers from both sides of the border are enrolled in the program, which accounts for more than six percent of border crossings. Travelers may call the CBP Help Desk at 1-800-927-8729 (press 0, then 1 for technical support); or the Canada Border Services Agency Help Desk at 1-888-281-5778 for French calls; or e-mail [email protected].

The announcement is at http://www.customs.treas.gov/xp/cgov/newsroom/news_releases/08162007_3.xml. The online application is available at http://www.customs.treas.gov/xp/cgov/travel/trusted_traveler/goes/.

Back to Top

5. California CBP Provides Tips for Mexican Students Entering the U.S.

To facilitate the inspection process at the border, CBP Port Director Billy Whitford of the Calexico, California, ports of entry recently released the following tips for F-1 students attending grade school, high school, or college and residing in Mexicali, Mexico, to follow in advance of entry into the U.S.:

  • Verify that your passport (with an F-1 student visa) is valid. If your passport has expired, you will need to obtain a valid one.
  • Verify that your I-20 (Eligibility for Non-Immigrant F-1 Student Status) form is properly endorsed by the designated school official at your school for the new school year.
  • Verify that you have an I-94 document with your passport.
  • If you recently obtained an F-1 student visa from the U.S. Consulate, present yourself at the pedestrian permit office at either port to process it before classes commence.
  • Upon “application for entry,” have your entry document(s) and school identification ready to present to the inspecting officer.
  • Once a student enters the pedestrian building at the downtown port of entry, a student may apply for entry at the far left pedestrian booth, Monday through Friday.
  • If a student is applying for entry through the SENTRI lane, or in a carpool, the above requirements also apply.

Mr. Whitford’s tips are available at http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/newsroom/news_releases/08162007_2.xml.

Back to Top

6. USCIS Issues Service Center and Lockbox Receipting Update

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that it has experienced a tremendous increase in the number of applications filed, which has resulted in a “front log” of cases awaiting data entry. USCIS will prioritize data entry for specific form types. Delays in data entry and fee receipting will not affect change of status or extension of stay eligibility, assuming all other eligibility requirements are satisfied, USCIS said. The agency also noted that requests for Premium Processing Service will continue to be processed within 15 days.

The actual received date will be honored and recorded on the receipt notice. This date will appear in the “Received Date” box on Form I-797, Notice of Action. The received date on the I-797 is different from the “Notice Date,” which also appears on the Notice and identifies the date the receipt notice was generated.

USCIS will provide weekly updates on its Web site. USCIS released information on completed data entry and receipt notices for applications and petitions received on or before the dates listed at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/ReceiptingTimes081707.pdf. Please note that the receipt dates do not indicate the date the applicant or petitioner will receive the receipt, only the date it is issued. ABIL members have experienced a lag time of 10 or more days until the actual receipt reaches the applicant or counsel.

Back to Top

7. DV-2009 Lottery Registration Period to Begin in October

The DV-2009 immigrant visa lottery online entry period begins at noon EDT on October 3, 2007, and ends at noon EDT on December 2, 2007. Additional information and instructions are expected to be posted shortly at http://travel.state.gov/visa/immigrants/types/types_1318.html, which has a link to the previous instructions for reference purposes.

Back to Top

8. El Salvador TPS Extended

The designation of El Salvador for temporary protected status (TPS) has been extended for 18 months to March 9, 2009, from its current expiration date of September 9, 2007.

The notice automatically extends the validity of employment authorization documents (EADs) issued under the TPS designation for six months, through March 9, 2008, and explains how TPS beneficiaries and their employers may determine which EADs are automatically extended. New EADs with the March 9, 2009, expiration date will be issued to eligible TPS beneficiaries who timely re-register and apply for an EAD.

The 60-day re-registration period began August 21, 2007, and will remain in effect until October 22, 2007. To facilitate processing of applications, applicants are strongly encouraged to file as soon as possible after the start of the 60-day re-registration period. Details are available in the August 21, 2007, Federal Register notice at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/E7-16092.htm.

Back to Top

9. NCSL Releases Report on 2007 Enacted State Immigration Legislation

State legislators have introduced roughly two and a half times more immigration-related bills in 2007 than in 2006, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), which notes that in the continued absence of comprehensive federal reform, states have developed a variety of approaches and solutions of their own. NCSL has released a comprehensive online report that provides an overview of introduced legislation and summarizes enacted laws relating to immigrants and refugees by state. The report includes legislative proposals and laws concerned with immigration enforcement as well as all those in which legal and undocumented immigrants, migrants, and refugees are affected. The report is available at http://www.ncsl.org/programs/immig/2007ImmigrationUpdate.htm.

Back to Top

10. Report on Web Basic Pilot Released

Westat of Rockville, Maryland, has released an interim report sent to the Department of Homeland Security in December 2006 on the Web version of the Basic Pilot Program. The 116-page report, “Interim Findings of the Web-Based Basic Pilot Evaluation,” notes that on the basis of findings from earlier evaluations, the pilot programs other than the Basic Pilot were terminated. The current Web Basic Pilot program incorporates a number of recommended enhancements. Among other things, Westat found that the Web Basic Pilot instantly verified the work authorization status of employees more frequently than did the original program. In the Web Basic Pilot, the report notes, 92 percent of cases were initially found to be work-authorized compared to 79 percent in the original Basic Pilot. Westat also found that the accuracy of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services database used for verifications has improved substantially but further improvements are needed. Overall, most employers using the Web Basic Pilot found it to be an effective, reliable tool and reported that the program was not burdensome.The report is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/nativedocuments/WestatInterimReport.pdf.

Back to Top

11. Recent News from ABIL Members

Ron Klasko (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers-klasko.htm) was quoted in the headline story, “Local Firms Feel Green Card Reversal Impact,” in The Legal Intelligencer on July 13, 2007. This story dealt with the Department of State and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service’s reversal of July visa number availability.

NAFSA: Association of International Educators reported on Mr. Klasko’s guest appearance on a July broadcast of the Voice of America radio talk show Encounter, “International Students in the U.S.: Balancing Openness with Security.” A press release is available on NAFSA’s Web site at http://www.nafsa.org/partners.sec/global_partnership_program or http://www.nafsa.org/_/File/_/klasko_vofa_aug_07.pdf.

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2007-09-01 00:00:432019-09-18 23:55:38News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 3, No. 9 • September 01, 2007

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 3, No. 8 • August 01, 2007

August 01, 2007/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. DOS, USCIS Reverse Policies, Release Guidance in Response to July Visa Number Debacle -The Department of State and USCIS reversed course to resolve the dilemma of tens of thousands of skilled workers who were left out in the cold by the State Department’s sudden announcement on July 2 that there would be no further employment-based green card numbers available this fiscal year.

2. Federal Court Strikes Down PA Illegal Immigration Law – In a ruling viewed as a setback to similar measures in cities and states nationwide, a federal court has struck down Hazleton, Pennsylvania’s “Illegal Immigration Relief Act.”

3. New Application and Petition Fees Went Into Effect on July 30; Rep. Lofgren Introduces Bill to Void New Fees – USCIS issued a reminder that the new fee schedule is effective as of July 30, 2007, with one exception.

4. USCIS Announces Extension of Temporary Suspension of Premium Processing Service for I-140s – USCIS announced an extension of the temporary suspension of Premium Processing Service for the Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker (Form I-140).

5. USCIS Rescinds Earlier Update, Allows Prepaid Mailers – USCIS is, once again, allowing the public to enclose prepaid mailers in connection with applications or petitions filed with USCIS.

6. DHS Exempts Portions of IDENT System From Privacy Act – The Department of Homeland Security issued a final rule exempting portions of the Automated Biometric Identification System from certain provisions of the Privacy Act.

7. FBI Warns Employers About Potential ‘Spies’ – The FBI advises employers to be on the lookout for suspicious people who have favorite “disguises,” including representatives of research institutes, visiting business professionals and scientists, tourists or visitors on nonimmigrant visas, diplomatic officials, false front companies, and students and educators.

8. Passport Measures Relaxed in Response to Massive Backlogs – The State Department has relaxed the passport rules temporarily for North American travel.

9. House Passes Liberian TPS Measure – The House has an extension of the designation of temporary protected status (TPS) for Liberia for an additional 12 months, through September 30, 2008; attention next will focus on the Senate.

10. GAO Reports on Challenges in Attracting International Students and Implications for Global Competitiveness -Recent trends have raised concerns about whether the U.S. will continue to attract talented international students.

11. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members


Details:

1. DOS, USCIS Reverse Policies, Release Guidance in Response to July Visa Number Debacle

The Department of State and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) reversed themselves on July 17, 2007, to resolve the dilemma of tens of thousands of skilled workers who had been left out in the cold by the Department’s sudden announcement on July 2, 2007, that there would be no further employment-based green card numbers available until October.

In response to the controversy over the sudden cut-off, USCIS and the State Department reversed themselves. “The public reaction to the July 2 announcement made it clear that the federal government’s management of this process needs further review,” said Emilio Gonzalez, USCIS’s Director. “I am committed to working with Congress and the State Department to implement a more efficient system in line with public expectations.”

The July 2 announcement resulted in much outrage among workers, employers, and their attorneys, and lawsuits were filed and threatened. Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Cal.), whose district includes Silicon Valley, wrote to Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff asking for “all correspondence, emails, memoranda, notes, field guidance or other documentation” leading to the sudden decision. Microsoft Corporation announced on July 5 that it plans to open soon a software development center in Vancouver, Canada, to “recruit and retain highly skilled people affected by immigration issues in the U.S.” S. Somasegar, corporate vice president of Microsoft’s Developer Division, noted that “Microsoft is a global company, and our greatest asset is smart, talented, highly skilled people. Our goal as a company is to attract the next generation of leading software developers from all parts of the world, and this center will be a beacon for some of that talent.”

After consulting with USCIS, the Visa Office advised that Visa Bulletin #107 (dated June 12, available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3258.html) should be relied upon as the July Visa Bulletin for purposes of determining employment-based visa number availability, and that Visa Bulletin #108 (dated July 2) has been withdrawn. USCIS announced that it is accepting employment-based applications to adjust status (Forms I-485) filed by aliens whose priority dates are current under Visa Bulletin #107. USCIS will accept applications filed no later than August 17, 2007. Those applications may no longer be filed electronically and must be submitted to a Service Center via regular mail or courier service, USCIS said. Applications already properly filed with USCIS also will be accepted. The current fee schedule will apply to all applications filed under Visa Bulletin #107 through August 17, 2007. The new fee schedule that became effective on July 30, 2007, applies to all other applications filed on or after July 30, 2007.

USCIS also subsequently released several FAQs containing detailed guidance, discussed below.

On July 27, 2007, USCIS released a FAQ (#2) on employment-based adjustment applications filed by those whose priority dates were “Current” under Department of State July Visa Bulletin No. 107. The FAQ makes the following points:

  • USCIS will permit applicants who filed adjustment applications between July 2 and July 17, 2007, but who have not yet received a USCIS-generated receipt notice, to file for Advance Parole and Employment Authorization based on proof of delivery of the I-485 application.
  • The receipt date for such applications will be based on the date the applications were physically received by USCIS.
  • USCIS will accept medical examinations completed abroad by physicians authorized by the Department of State. Applicants must be physically present in the United States when filing for adjustment of status.
  • An e-filed I-140 petition (that is not based on a required labor certification) filed on July 31, 2007, will receive a priority date of July 31, 2007, if the supporting documents arrive at a later date. In accordance with e-filing standard procedures, the date on which the I-140 petition is received by USCIS will be the priority date. Supporting documentation must be filed within allotted time limitations.
  • A receipt notice from a courier service or overnight mailing service constitutes a “postmark” for fee determination purposes.
  • For those who fell out of valid nonimmigrant status between July 2 and July 16, 2007, as a direct result of the inability to file for employment-based adjustment during that period, USCIS said it “has discretion to consider extraordinary circumstances that are beyond the alien’s control and may forgive a short gap in status for such aliens.”
  • If an individual’s pre-August 1, 2007, priority date based on an approved labor certification and approved I-140 petition is transferred to a subsequently filed I-140 petition, the later filed I-140 petition may be concurrently filed with an I-485 application between August 1, 2007, and August 17, 2007. An approved I-140 petition on behalf of a beneficiary accords the beneficiary the priority date of the approved I-140 petition for any subsequently filed I-140 petitions on his or her behalf. Therefore, as long as the initial priority date remains current under Visa Bulletin No. 107, a subsequently filed I-140 and an adjustment application may be filed until August 17, 2007.
  • If an alien has a pre-August 1, 2007, priority date based on an approved labor certification and a pending I-140 petition, the alien may not be accorded the earlier priority date on a subsequently filed I-140 petition such that the later I-140 and adjustment application may be filed between August 1, 2007, and August 17, 2007. In accordance with 8 CFR 204.5(e), only an approved I-140 petition on behalf of a beneficiary accords the beneficiary the priority date of the approved I-140 petition for any subsequently filed I-140 petitions on his or her behalf. A priority date may only be retained for use in conjunction with a subsequently filed Form I-140 petition if the previous petition was approved and not revoked. If the first petition remains pending, then the filing date of the labor certification submitted in support of the petition may not be used as a basis for a request to retain the priority date.
  • The version date on the new I-485 form is 7/30/07 and it has an “N” designation after it, but this does not mean that the I-485 applications arriving at the Service Center on or after July 30, 2007, must use the new I-485 form or it will be rejected at the mailroom. The “N” designation on the new version was inadvertently uploaded to the USCIS Web site and has since been removed, USCIS explained. The new and corrected I-485 application form that will be uploaded will have the “Y” designation, which means that the earlier version of the form will not be rejected.
  • All applications, petitions, and notices of legal representation must be properly signed. For more information, see the Reminder Regarding Signature Requirements, available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=9453d59ae8a8e010VgnVCM1000000ecd190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=fe529c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD.
  • A visa number must be available at the time of filing for adjustment of status. Thus, if a principal applicant with a current priority date under Visa Bulletin No. 107 files for adjustment of status between July 17 and August 17, 2007, any derivative family members must either also file during this time period, or wait until immigrant visa numbers become available at a later date pursuant to the Visa Bulletin.
  • The correct filing fee for a concurrently filed I-140 with an adjustment application filed between July 30, 2007, and August 17, 2007, is $475. The new increased fee applies to Forms I-140, whether or not concurrently filed with an employment-based adjustment application, filed on or after July 30, 2007.

USCIS also released an earlier FAQ (#1) regarding the same topic. That FAQ makes the following points, among others:

  • The fee of $180 for Forms I-765 and the fee of $170 for Form I-131 will remain in effect for those eligible to file an employment-based adjustment of status application pursuant to July Visa Bulletin No. 107. These fees will remain in effect for all such applications filed between July 17 and August 17, 2007.
  • Applicants will not have the option of paying the new filing fees for adjustment applications. USCIS has determined that those in employment-based categories filing applications pursuant to July Visa Bulletin No. 107 should be subject to the pre-July 30, 2007, fees because that fee schedule would have applied had they been allowed to file throughout the month of July.
  • USCIS will not accept employment-based adjustment of status applications under July Visa Bulletin No. 107 if the priority date is August 1, 2007 or later.
  • USCIS will accept adjustment applications under July Visa Bulletin No. 107 that are submitted by August 17, 2007, if the priority date is before July 31 but the certification is granted after August 1.
  • USCIS will accept properly filed Forms I-140 filed on behalf of beneficiaries with a priority date on or after August 1, 2007; however, pursuant to August Visa Bulletin No. 109, USCIS will reject any concurrently filed adjustment of status applications filed by those with a priority date on or after August 1, 2007.
  • USCIS will accept adjustment of applications filed pursuant to Visa Bulletin No. 107 without a completed medical examination. In such cases, USCIS will issue a request for evidence.
  • Applications delivered on August 17, 2007, will be accepted but those arriving August 18, 2007, will be rejected.
  • USCIS interprets AC21 §104(c) (for three-year H-1B extensions) as only applicable when a beneficiary of an approved I-140 petition is eligible to be granted lawful permanent resident status but for application of the per-country limitations. Any petitioner seeking an H-1B extension on behalf of a beneficiary pursuant to AC21 §104(c) must thus establish that at the time of filing for such extension, the beneficiary is not eligible to be granted lawful permanent resident status on account of the per-country immigrant visa limitations.
  • Depending on the volume of applications received as a result of the July 17 notice reopening the filing period for employment-based adjustment applications under the July Visa Bulletin, there may be some delay in the issuance of receipt notices. Processing times will be updated on the USCIS Web site.
  • USCIS advises applicants filing a Form I-485 that does not contain a copy of an I-797 receipt notice for a previously filed Form I-140 to put a “brightly colored sheet of paper” on top of the filing with the following notice and information: “TO THE MAILROOM: The enclosed I-485 Adjustment Application(s) should be matched with a pending I-140 Immigrant Petition for which no Receipt Notice has been received. The Immigrant Petition [type, e.g., I-140] was delivered to [Service Center] on [date of filing and tracking number]; Petitioner’s name; Beneficiary’s name; Beneficiary’s date of birth; Beneficiary’s country of birth.”

For August, all employment-based preference categories are “Unavailable.” The Department said it is uncertain whether any numbers will be returned and can be reallocated at a future date. Until informed otherwise, the categories will remain unavailable until October, when the new federal fiscal year begins.

USCIS’s announcement is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/VisaBulletinUpdate17Jul07.pdf. The August Visa Bulletin is available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3269.html. FAQ #2 is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/FAQ2.pdf. FAQ #1 is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/EBFAQ1.pdf. Information on fees is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/Update_eFiling073007.pdf.

Download: Click here
Back to Top


2. Federal Court Strikes Down PA Illegal Immigration Law

In a ruling viewed as a setback to similar measures in cities and states nationwide, a federal court has struck down Hazleton, Pennsylvania’s “Illegal Immigration Relief Act,” a 2006 law that fined landlords who rented to undocumented persons and revoked the business permits of employers who hired them. About a third of Hazleton’s estimated 21,100 to 30,000 residents are from Central America, up from about five percent in 2000, and up to a quarter of those may be undocumented, according to some estimates.

Ruling that the local law is preempted by federal immigration law, U.S. District Judge James M. Munley noted that “[a]llowing states or local governments to legislate with regard to the employment of unauthorized aliens would interfere with congressional objectives.” Judge Munley further opined that “[e]ven if federal law did not conflict with Hazleton’s measures, the City could not enact an ordinance that violates rights the Constitution guarantees to every person in the United States, whether legal resident or not. The genius of our Constitution is that it provides rights even to those who evoke the least sympathy from the general public.” He noted that “[w]hatever frustrations officials of the city of Hazleton may feel about the present state of federal immigration enforcement, the nature of the political system in the United States prohibits the city from enacting ordinances that disrupt a carefully drawn federal statutory scheme.”

The ruling was welcomed by immigrant advocates and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. “Today’s decision sends an unmistakable message to local officials across the nation that these types of ordinances are a waste of taxpayers’ money, anathema to American values and a violation of the Constitution,” said Omar Jadwat of the ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s National Chamber Litigation Center released a statement noting that “[s]tate and local governments have no business setting national immigrant policy.” The fight is not over yet, however. Bob Dane, a spokesman for the Federation for American Immigration Reform, said, “We are planning to join with the mayor and appeal” the ruling in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

The National Conference of State Legislatures estimated that in just the first four months of 2007, states have introduced more than 1,100 bills and resolutions related to immigration. The total last year was 570 bills. In June, Colorado’s Supreme Court ruled that Colorado’s controversial measure to prevent undocumented persons from receiving some government services violated a state constitutional requirement that initiatives address a single subject. Immigration is expected to continue to factor in elections in that state. Meanwhile, Georgia and Arizona are requiring employers to participate in the Basic Pilot work authorization verification program. Beaufort County, South Carolina, plans a mass audit of businesses’ immigration records.

Back to Top


3. New Application and Petition Fees Went Into Effect on July 30; Rep. Lofgren Introduces Bill to Void New Fees

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a reminder that, with the exception noted below, the new fee schedule is effective as of July 30, 2007. Applications or petitions postmarked or otherwise filed on or after that date must include the new fees. The exception is that the fee schedule in place before July 30 will apply to “[a]ll I-765 and I-131 applications based on employment-based adjustment of status applications filed pursuant to Visa Bulletin #107” through August 17, 2007. Those applications may no longer be electronically filed and must be submitted to a Service Center via regular mail or courier service, USCIS said.

USCIS also recently posted and then withdrew an announcement that it would take offline for maintenance its e-filing system and posted the new I-485 application form to reflect higher fees, despite the dispensation to file at the old fee through August 17.

Meanwhile, Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Cal.) introduced a bill on July 30, 2007, to void the increases in immigration fees. The bill, which would reinstate the previous fee structure, states that USCIS has failed to reduce application backlogs and has suffered from a lack of transparency and effective management. “Our immigration services need to move into the 21st century,” Rep. Lofgren said. “But USCIS has consistently failed to explain or justify the amounts and distributions of this new fee increase. While I agree that USCIS needs to modernize its existing infrastructure and procedures, they must do so in a transparent and open manner. After repeated requests over several months, USCIS has yet to provide Congress with a detailed plan for its infrastructure modernization efforts. Our immigration system should be both effective and fair; sacrificing one to achieve the other should not be an option.”

The new fee schedule that became effective on July 30, 2007, applies to all other applications filed on or after July 30, 2007. Overall, application and petition fees have increased, on average, about 66 percent. The new fee schedule is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/nativedocuments/FinalUSCISFeeSchedule052907.pdf. Information on the exception under Visa Bulletin #107 is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/VisaBulletinUpdate17Jul07.pdf and http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/Update_eFiling073007.pdf. Rep. Lofgren’s press release announcing the new bill is available at http://lofgren.house.gov/PRArticle.aspx?NewsID=1819.

Back to Top


4. USCIS Announces Extension of Temporary Suspension of Premium Processing Service for I-140s

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on July 24, 2007, an extension of the temporary suspension of Premium Processing Service for the Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker (Form I-140). USCIS anticipates that the volume of I-140 petitions filed that request Premium Process Service will continue to exceed the agency’s capacity to provide the service according to the program guidelines. Premium Processing Service guarantees that within 15 calendar days of receipt of a petition, USCIS will issue an approval or denial notice, a notice of intent to deny, or a request for evidence, or will open an investigation for fraud or misrepresentation.

The suspension will continue until further notice, USCIS said.

The notice is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/PremProcI140_072407.pdf.

Back to Top


5. USCIS Rescinds Earlier Update, Allows Prepaid Mailers

On July 27, 2007, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) retracted a July 23 update regarding the discontinuance of prepaid mailers for issuing notices and documents. Before the July 23rd announcement, USCIS allowed the public to enclose prepaid mailers in connection with applications or petitions filed with USCIS. A prepaid mailer is essentially a self-addressed envelope, where postage is paid by the addressee, that USCIS may use for mailing a document to the petitioner/applicant or authorized representative. USCIS said it “is aware that the July 23rd announcement caused anxiety for several of its customers and USCIS is committed to finding an alternative that will allow the public the continued convenience of using prepaid mailers while not unduly impacting its operations.” Thus, USCIS is reinstating the practice of allowing prepaid mailers as an alternate method of delivering notices and documents to the public.

USCIS noted that prepaid mailers are not required. If an applicant/petitioner nonetheless wishes to submit one, it should meet the following criteria: Express and Priority mail (including FedEx, DHL, or UPS) with appropriate postage, with a prepaid shipping label on the package, already paid by the person who sends it; e.g., FedEx’s “Expanded Billable Stamp” or DHL’s “Easy Return Label,” among others.

The notice is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/RescindMailerUpdate072707.pdf.

Back to Top


6. DHS Exempts Portions of IDENT System From Privacy Act

The Department of Homeland Security issued a final rule on July 16, 2007, that exempts portions of the Automated Biometric Identification System (IDENT) system of records from certain provisions of the Privacy Act because of criminal, civil, and administrative enforcement requirements. IDENT is the primary repository of biometric information held by the DHS in connection with the enforcement of civil and criminal laws, including immigration law; related investigations, inquiries, and proceedings; and national security and intelligence activities.

Specifically, the DHS said the exemptions are required to preclude the subjects of these activities from frustrating related processes; to avoid disclosure of activity techniques; to protect the identities and physical safety of confidential informants and of immigration and border management and law enforcement personnel; to ensure the agency’s ability to obtain information from third parties and other sources; to protect the privacy of third parties; and to safeguard classified information. Disclosure of information to the subject of the inquiry could also permit the subject to avoid detection or apprehension, the DHS said, noting that “the exemptions are standard law enforcement and national security exemptions exercised by a large number of Federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies. In appropriate circumstances, where compliance would not appear to interfere with or adversely affect the law enforcement purposes of this system and the overall law enforcement process, the applicable exemptions may be waived.”

The final rule is available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/pdf/E7-13576.pdf.

Back to Top


7. FBI Warns Employers About Potential ‘Spies’

The Federal Bureau of Investigation recently released a controversial warning about potential spies. In the notice, the FBI advises employers to be on the lookout for suspicious people who have favorite “disguises,” including representatives of research institutes; visiting business professionals and scientists “who want to tour your state-of-the-art plants and operations worldwide”; tourists or visitors on nonimmigrant visas; diplomatic officials; false front companies; and students and educators. The notice warns about hypothetical scenarios such as: “You hire a foreign-born engineer who has been educated in this country. Over a 10-15 year period, she rises to mid-level management. Then, she returns to her home country – where she gets paid by that government to set up a business that competes with yours.”

According to news reports and blog entries, Indian students, among others, are not pleased by the FBI’s broad-brush characterization. Kaushik Biswas, a student, noted that “[a] student applying for an F-1 visa at a U.S. consulate is expected to return to his country and not stay back [in the U.S.]. If he even hints at staying back permanently, the consular officer rejects the visa application summarily. So the U.S. government fully expects that these highly skilled, educated, trained people will one day return to their homeland to share that knowledge. Add to that the state of immigration laws in this country that discourage skilled people from migrating here in any case. H-1Bs have now become a lottery, and the average wait time for an MS to get a green card is 6-12 years. So why does the fact of people returning to their home countries come as a shock to FBI?” A researcher employed by an American company, “Camille,” noted that “[b]usinesses and institutes already know how to protect themselves without FBI help. As for the lady ‘who returns to her home country’, isn’t it a touch paranoid to model Asian-born R&D executives as spies just because their home-country governments have decided to engage in venture capitalism?”

The FBI’s notice is available at http://www.fbi.gov/page2/july07/spying070907.htm.

Back to Top


8. Passport Measures Relaxed in Response to Massive Backlogs

Over the past several months, many U.S. travelers have encountered substantial delays in obtaining passports as a result of new rules imposing passport requirements for North American travel, for national security reasons. Some have missed important trips as a result. In response, the State Department has relaxed the rules temporarily. Assistant Secretary of State Maura Harty, who oversees passports for U.S. citizens, recently acknowledged the problem: “Over the past several months, many travelers who applied for a passport did not receive their document in time for their planned travel. I deeply regret that. I accept complete responsibility for this.”

A Department statement noted that “[w]e are aware that some travelers have not been able to obtain passports because of longer processing times caused by record-setting demand. Accordingly, we’re allowing flexibility because we are hearing about more cases of Americans missing flights. As a service organization dedicated to helping Americans, we cannot let this happen.”

U.S. citizens traveling to Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean and Bermuda who have applied for but not yet received passports can temporarily enter and depart from the U.S. by air with a government-issued photo identification and Department of State official proof of application for a passport through Sept. 30, 2007. U.S. citizens who take advantage of this accommodation will need to present the official proof of passport application to air carriers and to Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers at air ports of entry. Such individuals may be subject to secondary inspection.

Travelers who have not applied for passports should plan 10 to 12 weeks for standard passport processing and two to three weeks for expedited processing, the Department said.

Details are available at http://travel.state.gov/travel/cbpmc/cbpmc_3254.html.

Back to Top


9. House Passes Liberian TPS Measure

The House of Representatives has passed H.R. 3123, which extends the designation of temporary protected status (TPS) for Liberia for an additional 12 months, through September 30, 2008. Attention next will focus on the Senate’s Liberian legislation, S. 656. The text of the bill is available at http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-3123.
Back to Top


10. GAO Reports on Challenges in Attracting International Students and Implications for Global Competitiveness

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) has released “Higher Education: Challenges in Attracting International Students to the United States and Implications for Global Competitiveness.” The report notes that more international students obtain a higher education in the U.S. than in any other country, and they make valuable contributions while they are here. For those students returning home after their studies, the GAO said, such exchanges support federal public diplomacy efforts and can improve understanding among nations. The GAO noted that international students have earned at least a-third of all U.S. degrees at both the master’s and doctoral levels in several science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields. Yet recent trends, including a drop in international student enrollment in U.S. colleges and universities, and policy changes after September 11, 2001, have raised concerns about whether the U.S. will continue to attract talented international students.

GAO identified the following key issues that it said may affect the U.S.’s ability to continue attracting the world’s most talented international students:

  • The global higher education landscape is changing and providing more alternatives for students, as other countries expand their educational capacity and technology-based distance learning opportunities. In addition, U.S. universities are establishing branch campuses in other countries and partnerships with international institutions, allowing international students to receive a U.S. education without leaving home. Some countries also have developed strategic plans or offices focused on attracting international students.
  • The cost of obtaining a U.S. degree is among the highest in the world and rising. Average tuition in 2003 at public U.S. colleges and universities was second only to Australia.
  • Visa policies and procedures, tightened after September 11 to protect our national security, contributed to real and perceived barriers for international students. Post-September 11 changes included a requirement that almost all visa applicants be interviewed, affecting the number of visas issued and extending wait times for visas under certain circumstances. GAO has made several recommendations to strengthen the visa process in a way that reduces barriers for international students while balancing national security, and the agency said that recent changes have improved the process.

The GAO said that the U.S. must maintain an appropriate balance between protecting national security interests and ensuring long-term competitiveness. “Monitoring current trends and federal policies is essential to ensuring that the United States continues to obtain talented international students in the face of greater global competition,” the GAO concluded.

The report, GAO-07-1047T, which contains testimony presented on June 29, 2007, before the Subcommittee on International Organizations, Human Rights, and Oversight of the House of Representatives’ Committee on Foreign Affairs, is available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d071047t.pdf.

Back to Top


11. Recent News from ABIL Members

Angelo Paparelli (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers-paparelli.htm), president of the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers, was quoted in the July 27, 2007, edition of the Los Angeles Times on the recent federal court ruling that struck down Hazleton, Pennsylvania’s “Illegal Immigration Relief Act.” Mr. Paparelli, who opposes the Hazleton law, said, “I think the cities and states will be given a handy justification for not taking action, and I hope the pressure will be redirected back at Congress, where it belongs.” In the July 27, 2007, issue of the Los Angeles/San Francisco Daily Journal, he also noted that “[b]y interposing the city official, it created a blockage that the federal law never contemplated or tolerates. The problem is it would inevitably disrupt the timing of employment.” Also, Mr. Paparelli was quoted by the Associated Press as predicting that courts will use the decision as a template. “[The judge] rebutted and threw down as wrongheaded every legal argument the city made,” he said.

Stephen Yale-Loehr (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers-loehr.htm) testified as an expert witness for the American Civil Liberties Union in the lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Hazleton law. In the July 27, 2007, edition of the Dallas Morning News, he noted that “[o]ne of the main themes of the ruling is that federal law preempts local and state immigration laws.” He also was quoted in the July 26, 2007, edition of the Financial Times. “The Hazleton ruling should be a big red stoplight to other cities
thinking of enacting anti-immigrant laws,” Mr. Yale-Loehr said.

Mr. Yale-Loehr also was quoted in the July 21, 2007, edition of Information Week in an article about the myths and facts driving the H-1B debate. He disputed speculation that there is a “huge fraud problem” in the H-1B program. Noting that competition for high-tech talent is global for premier U.S. employers, Mr. Yale-Loehr also noted that “[a]t the very top end, for truly multinationals like Microsoft and Oracle, it really is a competition for the best and brightest.” That article is available online at http://www.informationweek.com:80/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=201200100.

Commenting on the July visa numbers fiasco and the Department of State’s subsequent efforts to resolve the problem, Mr. Yale-Loehr said in the July 18, 2007, edition of the Wall Street Journal, “Without saying so explicitly, the government has admitted its error. This will bring a relief to the people who were hurt, but it shows our immigration system is broken.”

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2007-08-01 00:00:552019-09-18 23:59:08News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 3, No. 8 • August 01, 2007

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 3, No. 7 • July 01, 2007

July 01, 2007/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. Immigration Reform Bill Dies in Senate – On a procedural vote, the Senate killed the bipartisan bill on comprehensive immigration reform that has been the subject of much debate and controversy and that had the support of President Bush.

2. DOS Suddenly Announces No More Employment-Based Visa Numbers – In a stunning policy reversal, the Department of State suddenly announced that, effective July 2, 2007, all employment-based immigrant visa preference numbers are unavailable until October 1.

3. USCIS Issues Interim Guidance on Final Labor Certification Rule – USCIS has released interim guidance on the DOL’s final rule, effective July 16, 2007, which applies to permanent labor certification applications and approved certifications filed under both the PERM program and previous regulations.

4. Premium Processing Service Suspended Through July – The suspension of premium processing service will last for at least 30 days, beginning on July 2.

5. USCIS Issues Reminder on New Fees – USCIS has issued a reminder that the agency’s new fee schedule takes effect on July 30, 2007.

6. USCIS Announces Direct Filing for More Forms – Effective July 30, 2007, USCIS announced new “Direct Filing” instructions for additional immigration forms.

7. California Service Center Experiencing Delays – The California Service Center is experiencing system problems that are causing delays in the printing of certain notices.

8. DOL Updates Guidance on H-2B Labor Certification for Nonagricultural Workers – The Department of Labor has released updated guidance on processing H-2B applications in nonagricultural occupations.

9. SSA Releases Guidance on Social Security Number Matches – The SSA has released new technical guidance on the return file format for online Social Security Number verifications, effective August 25, 2007.

10. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members


Details:

1. Immigration Reform Bill Dies in Senate

On a procedural vote on June 28, 2007, the Senate killed (46-53) the bipartisan bill on comprehensive immigration reform that has been the subject of much debate and controversy and that had the support of President Bush. Comprehensive immigration reform legislation is not likely to be taken up again before the 2008 election. Democratic majority leader Harry Reid, however, held out hope that pieces of the legislation could be passed separately, such as a program for agricultural workers. According to sources, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Cal.) plans to attach that program, dubbed AgJobs, to other legislation in upcoming months.

Among other things, the new bill would have established a temporary guestworker program, and would have introduced a “points system” instead of many of the current employment-based visa categories. Those with education and experience, particularly in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields, and those with English skills would have been be favored under the legislation. The bill, which contained additional enforcement provisions, also would have allowed many of the estimated 12 million undocumented immigrants currently in the United States to eventually legalize their status. The cap on H-1B temporary professional workers would have been increased from 65,000 to 115,000 for fiscal year 2008, with a possible increase to 180,000 in following years.

Jack Shandley, vice president of meatpacker Swift & Company, seemed to sum up the sentiments of many who feel that business owners are between a rock and a hard place under the current system: “Immigration policy is divorced from enforcement, and the American employer, for one, is caught in the middle,” he said.

The defeated Senate bill’s text is available at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:SN01639:.

Back to Top


2. DOS Suddenly Announces No More Employment-Based Visa Numbers

After having stated on June 13 that the EB-1, EB-2, and EB-3 employment-based visa categories would be current for all countries in July, the Department of State (DOS) suddenly announced that effective July 2, 2007, all employment-based green card numbers have been used up for the rest of this fiscal year. DOS blamed the reversal on “sudden backlog reduction efforts” by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) during the past month, which resulted in the use of almost 60,000 employment-based numbers. DOS said that employment-based numbers once again will be available beginning October 1, 2007, under the FY 2008 annual numerical limitation.

In light of this revision of the July Visa Bulletin, USCIS has announced that it is rejecting applications to adjust status filed by foreign citizens whose priority dates are not current under the revised July Visa Bulletin.

The Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers (ABIL) believes the actions by DOS and USCIS are illegal. The revision to the July Visa Bulletin in effect is a new agency “rule” that required prior public notice and an opportunity to comment before the change could take effect under the Administrative Procedure Act. In ABIL’s view, the revision to the July Visa Bulletin and the actions in response taken by USCIS violate the requirements of President Bush’s January 18, 2007, Executive Order requiring prior review of “significant guidance documents” by the Office of Management and Budget.

ABIL also believes that these agency actions are contrary to settled agency practice. For many years, DOS’s practice has been to maintain the immigrant visa cut-off dates in place during the entire month for which the Visa Bulletin is published. The public, employers, foreign nationals, and the legal community all have relied on the agency’s longstanding practice. Because DOS and USCIS provided no advance notice or opportunity for comment, ABIL believes the revised July Visa Bulletin should not be given legal effect.

The Legal Action Center of the American Immigration Law Foundation (AILF) will file a lawsuit this week seeking to reverse these agency actions and require the acceptance of adjustment of status applications during the month of July. AILF is seeking plaintiffs who can show the hardships and costs they incurred as a result of the agencies’ actions. The American Immigration Lawyers Association and others are also working with USCIS and DOS to try to reach some sort of agreement. These organizations are also pushing for legislation that will address the EB retrogression and H-1B cap issues that Congress seemed willing to pass before comprehensive immigration reform legislation failed in the Senate. Now that the legislation is dead, the EB retrogression and H-1B provisions could be tacked onto another bill, with enough pressure from companies and individuals. Please contact your ABIL member for legal advice or if you’d like to help these organizations continue this fight on your behalf. Please also contact your representatives in Congress.

Meanwhile, Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Cal.) issued a statement in response to DOS’s update of the July Visa Bulletin and the subsequent rejection of applications for adjustment of status by USCIS. She said that DOS and USCIS “have seriously undermined the stability and predictability of U.S. immigration law. Thousands of individuals and businesses rely on the monthly bulletins to prepare and plan for the submission of applications. In addition, thousands of dollars in legal fees and other application-related expenses are incurred in preparation for filing applications based on the these monthly bulletins.” Rep. Lofgren wrote letters to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff asking them to reconsider. The complete text of both letters is available at http://lofgren.house.gov:80/PRArticle.aspx?NewsID=1808.

The original July Visa Bulletin is at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3258.html. The new July announcement is available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3263.html. The USCIS announcement stating that it will reject all adjustment of status applications filed by individuals whose priority date is not current per the revised Visa Bulletin is at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/VisaBulletin2Jul07.pdf.

Back to Top


3. USCIS Issues Interim Guidance on Final Labor Certification Rule

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has released interim guidance on the Department of Labor (DOL)’s final rule, effective July 16, 2007, which applies to permanent labor certification applications and approved certifications filed under both the Program Electronic Review Management (PERM) program and previous regulations governing the permanent labor certification program.

The DOL rule’s major provisions include a prohibition on the substitution of beneficiaries, a 180-day validity period for approved labor certifications, a requirement that employers pay the costs of labor certification, the establishment of procedures for debarment from the permanent labor certification program, and clarification of the DOL’s “no modifications” policy for applications filed on or after March 28, 2005, under the PERM process.

USCIS said it will continue to accept Immigrant Petitions for Alien Worker (Forms I-140) that request labor certification substitution that are filed before July 16, 2007. I-140 petitions that request labor certification substitution and are filed before July 16, 2007, will be adjudicated to completion according to the procedures outlined in the March 1996 DOL Delegation Memorandum of Understanding, to include the adjudication of any relating motions to reopen or reconsider, or an appeal (Form I-290B) by the Administrative Appeals Office.

With the exception noted below, USCIS will reject I-140 petitions that require an approved labor certification that are filed with a supporting approved labor certification that has expired. Such petitions that are accepted by USCIS in error will be denied based on the fact that the petition was filed without a valid approved labor certification. Exception: USCIS will continue to accept amended or duplicate I-140 petitions that are filed with a copy of a labor certification that is expired at the time the amended or duplicate I-140 petition is filed, if the original approved labor certification was filed in support of a previously filed petition during the labor certification’s validity period. Such filings may occur when a new petition is required due to successor-in-interest, where the petitioning employer wishes to file a new petition subsequent to the denial, revocation, or abandonment of the previously filed petition and the labor certification was not invalidated due to material misrepresentation or fraud relating to the labor certification application; in instances where the amended petition is requesting a different visa classification from the one requested in the previously filed petition; or when the previously filed I-140 has been determined to have been lost by USCIS or the Department of State.

USCIS’s press release, dated June 1, 2007, is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/DOLPermRule060107.pdf. The final rule was published on May 17, 2007, and is available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/pdf/E7-9250.pdf.

Back to Top


4. Premium Processing Service Suspended Through July

Effective July 2, 2007, USCIS has temporarily suspended premium processing service for the Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker (Form I-140). USCIS said it anticipates a substantial increase in the number of petitioning employers that will file such petitions because of “pent up demand for preference visa categories.” The volume of I-140 petitions filed that request premium processing service is expected to exceed USCIS’s capacity to provide the service, which guarantees that within 15 calendar days of receipt of a petition, USCIS will issue an approval notice, a notice of intent to deny, or a request for evidence, or will open an investigation for fraud or misrepresentation.

The suspension of premium processing service will last for at least 30 days, beginning on July 2, 2007, and ending on August 1, 2007. During this period, USCIS will determine whether it is able to process these cases within 15 calendar days of receipt. If so, premium processing service once again will be made available for I-140 petitions.

USCIS’s announcement of the temporary suspension is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/I140PPSTempSusp062706.pdf. USCIS also announced that it is extending a suspension of premium processing service for religious workers (R-1) for another 6 months, with an expiration date of December 18, 2007. That notice is at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/R1PremProcessing061807.pdf.

Back to Top


5. USCIS Issues Reminder on New Fees

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has issued a reminder that the agency’s new fee schedule takes effect on July 30, 2007. Applications or petitions postmarked or otherwise filed on or after that date must include the new fees. USCIS announced the new fee schedule last month. Under the new schedule, application and petition fees will increase, on average, about 66 percent. The reminder is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/FeeUpdate_07Jun29.pdf. The final fee rule is available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/pdf/E7-10371.pdf. USCIS’s press release is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/FinalFeeRulePressRelease052907.pdf. Questions and answers from USCIS are available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/FinalFeeRuleQsAs052907.pdf.
Back to Top


6. USCIS Announces Direct Filing for More Forms

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced new “Direct Filing” instructions for additional immigration forms that were transitioned last year into the “Bi-Specialization” initiative. Direct filing is the process by which USCIS requires applicants to file their petitions and applications with the USCIS service center that will process the filings, based on the place of temporary employment or place of residence. The center where they file also will generate the receipt notice and complete the adjudication.

Effective July 30, 2007, the following forms are included in the direct filing process: Form I-129F (Petition for Alien Fiancé(e)), Form I-131 (Application for Travel Document), Form I-140 (Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker), Form I-360 (Petition for Amerasian, Widow(er), or Special Immigrant), Form I-485 (Application To Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status), Form I-765 (Application for Employment Authorization), and Form I-907 (Request for Premium Processing Service). USCIS will implement direct filing incrementally for all remaining petition and application forms transitioned into the Bi-Specialization initiative.

The July 30 effective date coincides with the effective date of the fee increase for all immigration benefit applications and petitions. During the first 30 days of direct filing (July 30 to August 28), USCIS will not reject any form incorrectly filed at the prior filing location. Applicants must include the correct fee and must meet all other requirements for a proper filing, however. Beginning on or after August 29, 2007, USCIS will reject any of the forms listed above that are filed with the incorrect filing location.

USCIS’s notice is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/UpdateDirectFiling062107.pdf.

Back to Top


7. California Service Center Experiencing Delays

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ California Service Center (CSC) is experiencing system problems that are causing delays in the printing of certain notices. USCIS said it believes the delays are primarily affecting approval notices for cases decided between April 2007 and the present, although production of some receipt notifications may be affected as well. USCIS said it “is attempting to identify the source of the problem and generate the delayed notices as quickly as possible.” See http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/UpdateCSCSystems062607.pdf for the CSC’s interim procedures.
Back to Top


8. DOL Updates Guidance on H-2B Labor Certification for Nonagricultural Workers

The Department of Labor has released updated guidance for State Workforce Agencies (SWAs) and Employment and Training Administration National Processing Centers (NPCs) on processing H-2B temporary worker applications in nonagricultural occupations.

On April 4, 2007, the Department issued TEGL 21-06, which updated procedures for SWAs and NPCs to use in the processing of temporary labor certification applications under the H-2B program. The Department then held two public briefing sessions in Chicago and Atlanta on May 1 and May 4, 2007, to inform employers and other stakeholders of the updated processing guidance contained in TEGL 21-06. The attendees raised important questions and concerns, and the Department issued new guidance to outline certain modifications to TEGL 21-06 as a response to the issues raised and to improve the processing of H-2B applications by the SWAs and NPCs.

In the guidance, the Department reminds employers and other stakeholders of their right to request review of an SWA prevailing wage determination by the NPC; provides notification that the NPCs will no longer accept incomplete applications for processing from the SWAs; establishes a process for NPC Certifying Officers to issue a Request for Information (RFI) in certain circumstances; outlines the conditions under which NPC Certifying Officers may grant a partial temporary labor certification to an employer; and advises employers of the right to file a new application in circumstances where the NPC Certifying Officer issues a notice that a certification is denied. These modifications replace and supersede the previous corresponding operating procedures issued under TEGL 21-06, and apply to all pending and new temporary labor certification applications received by the SWAs on or after June 1, 2007.

The updated guidance is available at http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/tegl21-06c1.pdf. A fact sheet is available at http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/H-2B_Stakeholder_Factsheet_060607.pdf.

Back to Top


9. SSA Releases Guidance on Social Security Number Matches

The Social Security Administration (SSA) has released new technical guidance on the return file format for online Social Security Number verifications, effective August 25, 2007.

In general, there are two Internet verification options employers may use to verify that employee names and Social Security numbers match the SSA’s records. An employer may verify up to 10 names and SSNs (per screen) online and receive immediate results, such as to verify new hires. An employer also may upload overnight files of up to 250,000 names and SSNs and usually receive results the next government business day, the SSA said. This option may be used to verify an entire payroll database or when hiring a large number of workers. Although the service is available to all employers and third-party submitters, it can only be used to verify current or former employees and only for wage reporting (Form W-2) purposes.

The SSA’s new guidance is available at http://www.ssa.gov/employer/SSNVSTechfactSheet07.pdf. Additional information and instructions on how to use the Social Security Number Verification Service are available at http://www.ssa.gov/employer/ssnv.htm.

Back to Top


10. Recent News from ABIL Members

Stephen Yale-Loehr (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers-loehr.htm) was quoted in the June 25, 2007, edition of the New York Times in an article about the views of the high-tech industry with respect to the recently killed Senate immigration reform legislation. ‘High-tech companies are very organized. They have numerous lobby groups. When Bill Gates advocates more H-1B visas and green cards for tech workers, everyone listens. But that supposed influence has not translated into legislative results. High-tech companies have been lobbying unsuccessfully since 2003 for more H-1B visas. It’s hard to get anything through Congress these days. In addition, anti-immigrant groups are well organized. U.S. computer programmers are constantly arguing that H-1B workers undercut their wages.’ Mr. Yale-Loehr also was quoted in the June 5, 2007, edition of the New York Times. Commenting on the point system featured in the Senate bill, he noted: ‘A key theoretical advantage of a point system is the ability to respond to changing economic needs. Unfortunately, the Senate bill would lock in the criteria for at least 14 years. The economy changes much faster than that.’

Mr. Yale-Loehr also was quoted in the June 13, 2007, edition of the Financial Times of London. Commenting on Hazleton, Pennsylvania’s “Illegal Immigration Relief Act,” which imposes fines on landlords and employers who rent to or hire undocumented people, Mr. Yale-Loehr said such measures are unworkable because small-town landlords and bosses cannot be expected to keep up with the intricacies of immigration law or know whether someone may be entitled to legal status despite a lack of documents. “We would never allow states or cities to declare war,” so they shouldn’t be writing immigration laws that properly are the role of the federal government, Mr. Yale-Loehr said. And in the June 4, 2007, edition of the Dallas Morning News, Mr. Yale-Loehr commented on employee verification proposals, including requiring employers to verify the immigration status of existing employees, not just new hires, and requiring the Social Security Administration to issue biometric national identification cards. “The Social Security Administration has always resisted making the Social Security card the national identification card” because of the cost and complexity, Mr. Yale-Loehr noted, adding that such employee verification proposals don’t “just affect aliens. It is going to affect everyone in the United States.”

H. Ronald Klasko (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers-klasko.htm) presented sessions at the NAFSA: Association of International Educators Annual Conference in Minneapolis, Minnesota, from May 27 to June 1, 2007. Mr. Klasko delivered an “H-1B Update” and spoke on “Advising Foreign Nationals on International Travel.”

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2007-07-01 00:00:202019-09-19 00:29:04News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 3, No. 7 • July 01, 2007

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 3, No. 6 • June 01, 2007

June 01, 2007/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. Senate Debates Immigration Reform Bill – The Senate’s bipartisan bill on comprehensive immigration reform is being vigorously debated this week, with over 100 amendments being considered.

2. DOL Publishes Final Labor Certification Rule, Prohibits Substitutions; USCIS Terminates Premium Processing for I-140s Requesting Substitutions – The regulation’s provisions apply to permanent labor certification applications and approved certifications filed under both the Program Electronic Review Management (PERM) program regulation and previous regulations.

3. DOL Releases PERM Labor Certification FAQ – The Department of Labor released the Tenth Round of Frequently Asked Questions on PERM labor certification.

4. USCIS Issues Final Rule Increasing Fees – USCIS has issued a final rule that drastically increases fees for many immigration benefits.

5. DOL Clamps Down on Extensions for Labor Cert NOF Rebuttals – The BECs will no longer routinely grant extensions to the time allotted by regulation for employers or representatives to rebut a Notice of Findings.

6. USCIS Announces H-1B Cap Receipting Time Frames – USCIS provided projections for fee receipting and data entry processing for H-1B cap cases currently at the Service Centers.

7. DOL Holds H-2B Briefings, Releases Filing Tips – The DOL held two national briefing sessions to discuss recently updated guidance for State Workforce Agencies and ETA National Processing Centers when processing H-2B labor condition applications in nonagricultural occupations.

8. June Visa Bulletin Shows Significant Advances in EB-2 for China, India; All EB-3 Categories – The Department of State’s Visa Office has advanced the June cut-off dates significantly.

9. Lawsuit Threats Discourage Foreign Investment, Top Executives Say – Several CEOs of foreign companies invested in the U.S. said that litigation is a disincentive to conduct business here.

10. U.S. Consulate in Toronto Announces Minimum Two-Day Wait for Passports – All stateside visa applicants and those with urgent travel plans now have to wait a minimum of two business days for return of their passports if their visas have been approved.

11. State Dept. Publishes Key Officers Directory – The Department of State has released the latest version of its Telephone Directory, which includes key officers of foreign service posts and contact information.

12. Regulation Tracker Enables Searches for Rules, Proposed Rules, and Notices – Justia Regulation Tracker allows a user to search and track the Federal Register with a drop-down menu of all departments and agencies.

13. CBP Border Patrol Sponsors NASCAR Car – U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s Border Patrol has sponsored a NASCAR Busch Series car to “rev up” its ambitious hiring and recruiting of individuals interested in pursuing a career in border security.

14. TPS Extended for Nicaraguans, Hondurans – An 18-month extension of temporary protected status (TPS) for Nicaraguans has been granted, from July 5, 2007, to January 5, 2009.

15. Recent News from ABIL Members -Recent News from ABIL Members


Details:

1. Senate Debates Immigration Reform Bill

The Senate’s bipartisan bill on comprehensive immigration reform (S. 1348) is being debated this week. Among other things, the new legislation would establish a guestworker program and allow many undocumented persons to remain in the U.S. under a new “Z” visa program. The bill features a “points system” in lieu of many of the current family- and employment-based visa categories. Those with certain types of education and experience, and those with English skills, would be favored under the legislation. The bill contains additional enforcement and border control provisions. Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) called it “the most far-reaching immigration reform in our history.”

Under the Senate bill, up to 200,000 temporary guestworker (Y-1) visas would be provided in the first year, with increases or decreases depending on whether and when the cap is reached in the previous year. A separate guestworker program for farm laborers is also included.

The bill would increase the H-1B cap from 65,000 to 115,000 beginning in fiscal year 2008 and 180,000 annually after that, and would exempt from the annual cap a worker who has: (1) earned a master’s or higher degree from an accredited U.S. university; or (2) been awarded a medical specialty certification based on post-doctoral training and experience in the U.S.

The bill would require employers and subcontractors, within 18 months, to verify the legal status of new hires by using an electronic verification system. The maximum fine for hiring an undocumented worker would increase to $20,000 for each worker and repeat offenders could be sent to jail.

The Information Technology Association of America (ITAA), a lobbying group that represents high-tech companies, fears the bill will not address sufficiently the shortage of skilled workers and will make it harder to hire qualified foreign workers. ITAA President and CEO, Phillip J. Bond, noted in a letter to Sens. Harry Reid and Mitch McConnell how quickly the H-1B cap for fiscal year 2008 was reached, thus preventing many employers from recruiting skilled foreign nationals.

Among other things, the ITAA expressed concerns that the bill eliminates existing “degree equivalency” provisions so that employers would be barred from obtaining H-1B workers if their formal degrees do not correlate exactly to proposed positions; and ends dual intent for both H-1B and L-1B nonimmigrants, “interfering with the ability of companies to recruit from U.S. universities and seek a green card for them while employing them on an H-1B.”

The ITAA also said the proposed point system would “diminish America’s competitiveness by making nonimmigrant visas and green cards even more difficult to obtain.” Among other things, the ITAA noted, highly skilled professionals recruited by firms would be forced to compete with self-nominated applicants for the small number of available visas. “The proposal will move America’s immigration system away from one that is sensitive to business needs to one driven by the perceptions of government employees,” the ITAA said. The ITAA added that the proposed employment verification system, which is based on the current Basic Pilot Program, “needs a significant IT investment to make the system scalable for all employers to use as well as to reduce the current error rate within the system.”

Opposition to the bill is fierce. The White House reportedly favors the bill, but its lobbying efforts are being resisted by many Republicans, who fear anti-“amnesty” sentiment among their constituents. Some Democrats also oppose the bill, fearing that the temporary worker program will create an underclass of indentured workers. Over 100 amendments are being considered in the Senate.

A summary of the Senate bill’s main provisions is available at http://immigrationforum.org/documents/PolicyWire/Legislation/110/SenateBillQ&A.pdf. The bill and amendments are available at http://thomas.loc.gov (search S. 1348). The ITAA’s letter to the Senate is at http://www.itaa.org/upload/news/docs/s1348letter.pdf; an attachment outlining the ITAA’s key concerns is at http://www.itaa.org/upload/news/docs/1348concerns.pdf.

Back to Top


2. DOL Publishes Final Labor Certification Rule, Prohibits Substitutions; USCIS Terminates Premium Processing for I-140s Requesting Substitutions

The Department of Labor (DOL) published a final rule, effective July 16, 2007, to “enhance program integrity and reduce the incentives and opportunities for fraud and abuse related to the permanent employment of aliens in the United States.” The provisions apply to permanent labor certification applications and approved certifications filed under both the Program Electronic Review Management (PERM) program regulation, effective March 28, 2005, and previous regulations implementing the permanent labor certification program.

In general, the DOL rebutted commenters’ concerns about a wide variety of issues, such as increased costs and the loss of priority dates resulting from the new prohibition on substitution of beneficiaries, by maintaining that the benefits of the new provisions to the labor market and in preventing fraud outweigh the concerns of individual employers.

Meanwhile, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that beginning on Friday, May 18, 2007, Premium Processing Service is no longer available for Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker (Form I-140) petitions that request labor certification substitution. USCIS anticipates a substantial increase in the number of petitioning employers that will file I-140 petitions requesting Premium Processing Service and seeking labor certification substitution before July 16, 2007. The volume of such petitions is expected to exceed USCIS’ capacity to provide the service according to the program guidelines.

The rule’s major provisions include:

A prohibition on the substitution of beneficiaries. This prohibition will apply to all pending permanent labor certification applications and to approved permanent labor certifications. The prohibition does not affect substitutions approved by the DOL or Department of Homeland Security (DHS) before the effective date. It also does not affect substitution requests in progress as of the rule’s effective date. The final rule also prohibits the sale, barter, and purchase of labor certification applications and approved labor certifications.

A 180-day validity period for approved labor certifications. Employers will have 180 calendar days within which to file an approved permanent labor certification in support of an I-140. All permanent labor certifications approved on or after the effective date will expire 180 calendar days after certification, unless filed before expiration in support of a Form I-140 petition with DHS. Likewise, all certifications approved before the final rule’s effective date will expire 180 calendar days after the effective date unless filed in support of a Form I-140 petition with DHS before the expiration date.

A requirement that employers pay the costs of labor certification, including preparing, filing, and obtaining certification. The beneficiary may pay attorneys’ fees for representation of the beneficiary or other “legitimate” costs incurred by him or her, but an employer’s transfer to the beneficiary of the employer’s costs incurred is strictly prohibited. Prohibited payments include, but are not limited to, employer fees for hiring the beneficiary; receipt of part of the beneficiary’s pay, whether through a payroll deduction or otherwise, as reimbursement; reducing the beneficiary’s pay for purposes of reimbursement or pre-payment; goods and services or other wage or employment concessions; kickbacks, bribes or tributes; receipt of payment from beneficiaries, attorneys, or agents for allowing a permanent labor certification application to be filed on behalf of the employer; or the payment by the beneficiary of the employer’s attorneys’ fees.

The establishment of procedures for debarment from the permanent labor certification program. The DOL may debar an employer, attorney or agent for up to three years based on certain enumerated actions such as fraud, willful provision of false statements, or a pattern or practice of noncompliance with PERM requirements, regardless of whether the labor certification application involved was filed under the previous or current regulation. The rule extends from 90 to 180 days the period during which the DOL may suspend processing of applications under criminal investigation. The rule adds an intent requirement (“willful”) to the false information section; to be actionable, the employer must willfully provide false or inaccurate information to the DOL. The rule expands the existing provision for a right to review the DOL’s denial of an application or revocation of a certification, to encompass a right to review of a debarment action. The request for review would be made to, and in appropriate cases a concomitant hearing would be held by, the Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals (BALCA).

Clarification of the DOL’s “no modifications” policy for applications filed on or after March 28, 2005, under the PERM process. The rule finalizes with minor changes a provision in the proposed rule prohibiting modifications to permanent labor certification applications once such applications are filed with the DOL.

The final rule includes details on issues raised by public comment and the DOL’s resolution of those issues, the DOL’s cost-benefit analysis, and statistics on small businesses’ use of labor certification. It was published on May 17, 2007, and is available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/pdf/E7-9250.pdf. USCIS’s new procedures under the final rule are available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/PermRuleLaborCert052407.pdf. USCIS’s press release announcing termination of Premium Processing Service is at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/PPSPermRule051707.pdf.

Back to Top


3. DOL Releases PERM Labor Certification FAQ

On May 10, 2007, the Department of Labor released the Tenth Round of Frequently Asked Questions on PERM labor certification. The FAQ includes information on notices of filing, advertisement content, and types of evidence in response to audit requests. See http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/perm_faqs_5-9-07.pdf.
Back to Top


4. USCIS Issues Final Rule Increasing Fees

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has issued a final rule, effective 60 days from the May 30, 2007, publication date in the Federal Register, that, for the most part, drastically increases fees for many immigration benefits. USCIS said that without these fee adjustments, the agency would not be able to maintain critical business functions, properly address fraud and national security issues, and process incoming applications and petitions in a timely manner. The rule also expands the proposed fee waiver policy to include additional classes of applicants and petitioners who may apply for a waiver of certain application and petition fees for certain services.

Selected specific increases include:

  • Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker (Form I-129): Fee increased from $190 to $320
  • Application for Travel Document (Form I-131): Fee increased from $170 to $305
  • Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker (Form I-140): Fee increased from $195 to $475
  • Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status (Form I-485): Fee increased from $325 to $930
  • Immigrant Petition by Alien Entrepreneur: Fee increased from $480 to $1,435
  • Application to Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status: Fee increased from $200 to $300
  • Application for Waiver of the Foreign Residence Requirement: Fee increased from $265 to $545
  • Application for Status as a Temporary Resident (Form I-687): Fee increased from $255 to $710
  • Application to Adjust Status from Temporary to Permanent Resident (Form I-698): Fee increased from $180 to $1,370
  • Application for Employment Authorization (Form I-765): Fee increased from $180 to $340
  • Biometric Services: Fee increased from $70 to $80

The final rule, published at 72 Fed. Reg. 29852 (May 30, 2007), is available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/pdf/E7-10371.pdf. USCIS’s press release is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/FinalFeeRulePressRelease052907.pdf. Questions and answers from USCIS are available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/FinalFeeRuleQsAs052907.pdf.

Back to Top


5. DOL Clamps Down on Extensions for Labor Cert NOF Rebuttals

Employers with permanent labor certification applications pending at the Backlog Elimination Centers (BECs) should note that the BECs will no longer routinely grant extensions to the time allotted by regulation for employers or representatives to rebut a Notice of Findings (NOF). The Department of Labor’s Office of Foreign Labor Certifications will only grant such extensions for the “most extreme extenuating circumstances.” In the absence of a granted extension, applications for which a timely rebuttal is not posted by the deadline stated in the NOF will be denied. OFLC also strongly encourages employers and representatives to send in their responses to NOF letters and Recruitment Report Instructions letters as soon as a response is prepared. Although regulations set forth specific timelines for the maximum time allowed for a response, employers and representatives need not use the full allotted time to respond.

These notices, and additional information on labor certifications, are available at http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/.

Back to Top


6. USCIS Announces H-1B Cap Receipting Time Frames

Because of the unprecedented volume of recent H-1B filings, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is temporarily experiencing a receipting/data-entry “frontlog” at its Service Centers. USCIS provided the following projections for fee receipting and data entry processing for H-1B cap cases currently at the Service Centers. These projections do not apply to Premium Processing or I-129 H-1B (cap or non-cap) cases:

California Service Center. USCIS expects to provide in time-compliance for receipting of all form types by June 15, 2007.

Nebraska Service Center. USCIS is currently providing in time-compliance for receipting of all form types as of May 10, 2007.

Texas Service Center. USCIS is currently providing in time-compliance for receipting of all form types as of May 10, 2007.

Vermont Service Center. USCIS expects to provide in time-compliance for receipting of all form types by June 2, 2007.

USCIS noted that it may take additional time for a Service Center to complete fee receipting and data entry of an application or petition received and for the receiving Center to mail the appropriate receipt notice. USCIS recommends that persons who have filed a petition or application with USCIS wait at least 30 days from the applicable receipt processing time frame noted above before contacting USCIS with inquiries. If a response is not received from USCIS within 30 days of the dates listed above, USCIS recommends checking the Web site at http://www.uscis.gov or calling USCIS customer service at 1-800-375-5283 for updated processing information.

USCIS’s announcement is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/H1BReceipts051107.pdf.

Back to Top


7. DOL Holds H-2B Briefings, Releases Filing Tips

In early May, the Department of Labor (DOL) held two national briefing sessions in Chicago and Atlanta to discuss recently updated guidance for State Workforce Agencies and ETA National Processing Centers (NPCs) when processing H-2B labor condition applications in nonagricultural occupations. The purpose of the briefing sessions was to inform the user community of the processing protocols implemented at the NPCs in Chicago and Atlanta. To ensure that all employers are aware of the filing requirements, and to ensure that applications for H-2B visas are processed in the most efficient manner, the DOL has released filing tips for employers submitting H-2B applications.

The DOL also has released updated guidance for State Workforce Agencies and ETA National Processing Centers when processing H-2B labor condition applications in nonagricultural occupations. The guidance replaces and supersedes previous operating procedures issued under General Administrative Letter (GAL) 01-95, GAL 01-95, Change 1, and Field Memorandum (FM) 25-98. The DOL said that the guidance is intended to work in concert with the new centralized filing process at the NPCs to ensure greater consistency in the processing of H-2B applications. Special handling procedures for certain nonagricultural occupations, such as forestry workers and boilermakers, will be issued through separate guidance letters by the National Office of Foreign Labor Certification.

The guidance is available at http://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/attach/TEGL/TEGL21-06.pdf. A related Federal Register notice is at http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getpage.cgi?dbname=2007_register&position=all&page=19961. The filing tips are at http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/H-2B_Stakeholder_Application_Filing_Tips_050807_FINAL1.pdf. Separate PDFs are available for employers in the entertainment (http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/OFLC_Briefing_May_Sessions_Entertainers_FINAL.pdf) and forestry (http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/OFLC_Briefing_May_Sessions_Forestry_FINAL1.pdf) industries. A PDF of the presentation for employers is at http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/OFLC_Briefing_May_sessions_FINAL.pdf.

Back to Top


8. June Visa Bulletin Shows Significant Advances in EB-2 for China, India; All EB-3 Categories

The current level of demand in many of the employment-based visa categories has been much lower than anticipated. As a result, the Department of State’s Visa Office has advanced the June cut-off dates significantly in an effort to maximize number use under the annual numerical limits. The Department said that additional advances during the coming months are likely.

The Department noted that such cut-off date movements should allow for action to be finalized on a significant number of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services adjustment of status cases. Once that level of demand begins to exceed the supply of available numbers, it will be necessary to make adjustments to the cut-off dates, and retrogressions are possible.

The June Visa Bulletin is available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3236.html#bulletin_3236.html#.

Back to Top


9. Lawsuit Threats Discourage Foreign Investment, Top Executives Say

While lobbying members of Congress, several CEOs of foreign companies invested in the U.S. reportedly said that litigation is a disincentive to conduct business in the U.S. Gary Elliot, chairman and CEO of ThyssenKrupp USA, a German steelmaker that is spending $3.7 billion to build a plant in Alabama, said litigation “is a major business expense in comparison to Europe.” He noted that as a result, insurance costs also are much higher. Zin Smati, president and CEO of SUEZ Energy North America, noted that “[o]nce you open plants, you have to factor in the cost of doing litigation.” He estimated that each of his company’s 50 plants must deal with a lawsuit every 15 months. The CEOs noted, however, other factors that continue to make the U.S. attractive for investment, such as the robust U.S. market and intellectual property controls. The CEOs were in Washington, DC, for a conference organized by the Organization for International Investment (OFII). They met with Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, Democratic Caucus Chairman Rahm Emanuel (Ill.) and Sens. Trent Lott (R-Miss.) and Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.).
Back to Top


10. U.S. Consulate in Toronto Announces Minimum Two-Day Wait for Passports

All stateside visa applicants and those with urgent travel plans now have to wait a minimum of two business days for return of their passports if their visas have been approved. Clients should plan their travel accordingly.
Back to Top


11. State Dept. Publishes Key Officers Directory

The Department of State has released the latest version of its Telephone Directory, which includes key officers of foreign service posts and contact information, including posts’ telephone and fax numbers, business hours, and Web addresses. The directory is available at http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/82081.pdf.
Back to Top


12. Regulation Tracker Enables Searches for Rules, Proposed Rules, and Notices

Justia Regulation Tracker allows a user to search and track the Federal Register with a drop-down menu of all departments and agencies. A search can be conducted by date or keyword, as well as type of document: rule, proposed rule, notice, administrative or executive order, notice, or proclamation. Users also may browse by government agency.

The Web site also has links to Supreme Court cases and laws, including federal laws and state and local government laws. See http://regulations.justia.com/.

Back to Top


13. CBP Border Patrol Sponsors NASCAR Car

U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s Border Patrol has sponsored a NASCAR Busch Series car to “rev up” its ambitious hiring and recruiting of individuals interested in pursuing a career in border security. The Border Patrol has teamed up with Jay Robinson Racing for a 25-race sponsorship on the #28 Chevy that will run through the remainder of the 2007 NASCAR Busch Series season. The #28 Chevy made its debut with the Border Patrol sponsorship at Darlington Raceway during the Diamond Hill Plywood 200 on May 11, 2007. The announcement is at http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/newsroom/news_releases/05112007_5.xml.
Back to Top


14. TPS Extended for Nicaraguans, Hondurans

During the past year, the Departments of Homeland Security (DHS) and State have continued to review conditions in Nicaragua. They have concluded that an 18-month extension of temporary protected status (TPS), from July 5, 2007, to January 5, 2009, is warranted because there continues to be a substantial, but temporary, disruption of living conditions in Nicaragua resulting from Hurricane Mitch. Although significant progress has been made, Nicaragua remains unable, temporarily, to adequately handle the return of its nationals, as required for TPS designations based on environmental disasters.

DHS has also automatically extended the validity of Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) for eligible Hondurans and Nicaraguans for six months, through January 5, 2008. This extension is intended to allow sufficient time for eligible TPS beneficiaries to apply for and receive a new EAD without any lapse in employment authorization.

All TPS beneficiaries must comply with the re-registration requirements in order to maintain TPS benefits through January 5, 2009. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services noted that information about the re-registration period for Salvadorans “will be forthcoming. Re-registration applications from nationals of El Salvador will not be accepted at this time.”

Additional information on the Nicaraguan TPS extension, including a table showing the necessary application forms and fees depending on eligibility, is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/TPSNicExtendQA052907.pdf. Additional information on both the Nicaraguan and Honduran extensions is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/TPSHonNicExtend052907.pdf.

Back to Top


15. Recent News from ABIL Members

Angelo A. Paparelli (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers-paparelli.htm), who represents high-tech companies and is president of the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers, was quoted in the Wall Street Journal on May 18, 2007. Commenting on the new immigration deal between the White House and certain Senators that, among other things, includes mandatory work authorization verification against a federal database, Mr. Paparelli predicted that “[w]e will have a harrowing period of pressure on employers with the risk of criminal prosecution and discrimination lawsuits.”

Steve Clark (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers-clark.htm) made a presentation on PERM labor certification changes and coping with backlogs in employment-based immigration at the Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education (MCLE) advanced immigration seminar in Boston on May 11, 2007.

Stephen W. Yale-Loehr (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers-loehr.htm) was quoted in the May 17, 2007, issue of the New York Times as noting that the new legislation “represents a major philosophical shift. It tells the world that we are emphasizing characteristics that will enhance our global competitiveness, like education and job skills. We would not rely as much on family background as we have in the past.” Under the proposed legislation, he said, “foreign-born spouses and minor children of United States citizens could still get green cards, but foreign-born siblings and adult children of citizens would be hurt.”

Mr. Yale-Loehr also was interviewed on National Public Radio’s Morning Edition on May 23, 2007. He noted, among other things, that the proposed immigration bill “would be the biggest change in immigration policy in over 40 years.” An audio link is at http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=10344628.

Mr. Yale-Loehr also was quoted in the June 5, 2007, issue of the New York Times. Mr. Yale-Loehr criticized the Senate bill’s proposed points system for selecting economic immigrants because it would lock in the criteria for selecting immigrants for at least 14 years. ” The economy changes much faster than that,” he noted.

Mr. Yale-Loehr spoke on May 30 at the national conference of NAFSA: Association of International Educators in Minneapolis. He provided an overview of immigration law to international educators and summarized the current immigration reform bills pending in Congress.

Cyrus Mehta (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers-mehta.htm) spoke on a panel at a Council on Foreign Relations program on immigration from Latin America on May 19. A transcript of the symposium is at http://72.14.209.104/search?q=cache:KNG79XjCa6AJ:www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser%3FAction=UserDisplayFullDocument%26orgId=574%26topicId=25151%26docId=l:617189143%26start=22+council+on+foreign+relations+++”cyrus+mehta”&hl=en&ct=clnk&ch.

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2007-06-01 00:00:312019-09-19 00:33:21News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 3, No. 6 • June 01, 2007

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 3, No. 5 • May 01, 2007

May 01, 2007/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. USCIS Completes FY 2008 H-1B Selections, Changes Procedures – USCIS has completed the random selection process to determine which FY 2008 H-1B petitions would be accepted for processing, and outlined new procedures.

2. DHS Issues Final Rule on Petitioning Requirements for O and P Nonimmigrants – DHS issued a final rule to permit petitioners to file O and P nonimmigrant petitions up to one year before the petitioner’s need for the worker’s services.

3. DHS Revamping Electronic Verification System – DHS is updating its electronic records system to consolidate information from different systems of records notices and add new sources of data.

4. “Other Worker” Visa Category Becomes Unavailable; Some Categories Move Forward Significantly – The “other worker” category became unavailable beginning in May and will remain so for the remainder of fiscal year 2007.

5. USCIS Issues Final Rule Removing Standardized Request for Evidence Timeframe – The final rule maintains the current 12-week standard as a ceiling on the response time to be provided, and sets a maximum of 30 days to respond to a Notice of Intent to Deny.

6. Seventh Circuit Finds Labor Dep’t, Not DHS, Decides Job Requirements – The determination of what kind of training is required to classify someone as a “skilled” worker is made by the DOL, not the DHS.

7. Court Finds Jurisdiction to Review Adjustment Application Before Renewal in Removal Proceedings – Ninth Circuit precedent supported the finding that the court had jurisdiction to review the USCIS’s denial of adjustment of status.

8. USCIS Proposes Revisions for Religious Worker Visa Classifications – USCIS is proposing a variety of changes.

9. Children in Immigrant Families Generally Fluent in English – A new report finds that children in newcomer families have strong ties to their adopted country.

10. TV Personalities Spar Over Immigration – Radio talk-show host Bill O’Reilly recently got into a shouting match with Geraldo Rivera about the hot topic of immigration.

11. Change in Agency Names – The Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement has become U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection is now U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

12. Map Shows State Ratio of H-1B Applications to Employment – Research on H-1B visas is still in an early phase but regional data show some interesting patterns.

13. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members.


Details:

1. USCIS Completes FY 2008 H-1B Selections, Changes Procedures

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on April 12, 2007, that it completed the computer-generated random selection process to determine which H-1B petitions subject to the congressionally mandated H-1B cap for fiscal year (FY) 2008 would be accepted for processing. Among other things, petitioners who received receipt notices dated before April 12, 2007, cannot assume that their H-1B petitions have been accepted for processing, USCIS said.

As a result of the high volume of petitions subject to the computer-generated random selection process, USCIS did not conduct data entry of all cap-subject filings. Rather, it developed new procedures that “enabled the agency to efficiently process cap-subject petitions.” As required, FY 2008 cap-subject H-1B petitions were stamped to reflect the time and date of actual receipt. USCIS assigned a unique numerical identification number to the 123,480 properly filed H-1B petitions received on April 2 and 3 and, on April 12, conducted a computer-generated random selection process to determine which petitions would be accepted for processing. USCIS did not issue receipt notices for all the petitions received on April 2 and 3. It did, however, conduct data entry and generate (and in some cases issue) receipt notices for a portion of cap-subject petitions before conducting the random selection process. The issuance of receipt notices before conducting the random selection process had “no impact whatsoever” on whether a petition was randomly selected for processing, USCIS said.

Acknowledging that the process “caused some confusion,” USCIS noted the following:

  • Some cap-subject petitions were data-entered on April 2 and 3. Fees were deposited in connection with these petitions and receipt notices (Form I-797) were issued. USCIS cannot invalidate these receipt notices because the fees have been deposited. As noted above, petitioners who received receipt notices dated before April 12, 2007, cannot assume that their H-1B petitions have been accepted for processing. For cases that fall into this group, those that were not randomly chosen will be returned to petitioners and the filing fee will be refunded. Those that were accepted for processing will be processed under the original receipt notice.
  • Some cap-subject H-1B petitions were data-entered on April 4 and receipt notices were generated but never issued to petitioners. USCIS did not deposit any of the fees submitted with these filings and these receipt notices have been voided. For cases that fall into this group, those that were not chosen will be returned to petitioners with the filing fees and those that were accepted for processing will be issued official receipt notices dated on or after April 12, 2007.
  • Finally, a small number of cap-subject H-1B petitions, filed under premium processing, were also data-entered on April 4. In accordance with USCIS procedure, e-mail notification acknowledging receipt of these petitions was issued to petitioners. Official receipt notices were generated but never issued, and USCIS did not deposit any of the fees submitted with these filings. Thus, all generated receipt notices have been voided. For cases that fall into this group, those that were not chosen will be returned to petitioners with the filing fees and those that were accepted for processing will be sent a second e-mail confirmation of receipt and will be issued new receipt notices dated on or after April 12, 2007.

USCIS said it will return all petitions not randomly selected for processing, with the fee(s), to the petitioner or authorized representative. Final notification of those petitions is expected to occur in May.

USCIS continues to accept new FY 2008 H-1B petitions filed on behalf of aliens with U.S.-earned master’s or higher degrees. Those petitions have a separate cap of 20,000. Over 19,100 H-1B master’s degree petitions had been filed as of April 25, so that separate cap is likely to be reached very soon. USCIS plans to make a future announcement regarding the “final receipt date” for these petitions.

USCIS also announced that the 15-day premium processing period for petitions subject to the FY 2008 cap began after the computer-generated random lottery selected the petitions for processing. USCIS said that the large number of H-1B filings on April 2 and April 3 required placing conditions on the availability of the premium processing service. The agency’s ability to provide premium processing service to these petitions was affected by the fact that the cap was reached and exceeded the first day employers could file H-1B petitions.

Corporate clients may contact their members of Congress directly (by personalized letters, phone calls, or personal meetings) to let them know how the H-1B cap and employment-based (EB) backlog problems are hurting them. A model letter that client companies can personalize is located at: http://capwiz.com/aila2/issues/alert/?alertid=9589591. Also, the American Immigration Lawyers Association is collecting examples of how the inability to hire H-1B workers and the delays in getting EB green cards are adversely affecting companies, hospitals, and other entities. Examples (with or without attribution) may be e-mailed to [email protected]. A sign-on letter template is available at http://www.capwiz.com/aila2/attachments/81H17006_sign_on_letter_text.doc.

USCIS’s announcement about the new H-1B procedures is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/H1Bfy08CapUpdate041907.pdf. The agency’s announcement about the premium processing period is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/H1Bfy08PremProc040907.pdf. The agency’s H-1B cap count page is at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=138b6138f898d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCRD&vgnextchannel=91919c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD.

Back to Top


2. DHS Issues Final Rule on Petitioning Requirements for O and P Nonimmigrants

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a final rule effective May 16, 2007, to permit petitioners to file O and P nonimmigrant petitions up to one year before the petitioner’s need for the worker’s services. The rule is intended to enable petitioners who are aware of their need for the services of an O or P nonimmigrant well in advance of a scheduled event, competition, or performance to file their petitions under normal processing procedures. “This way, petitioners will be better assured that they will receive a decision on their petitions in a timeframe that will allow them to secure the services of the O or P nonimmigrant when such services are needed,” the DHS said.

Current regulations governing both O and P nonimmigrants preclude the petitioner from filing a Form I-129 (Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker) more than six months before the actual need for the alien’s services. The DHS noted that the timing of filings by petitioners, combined with current U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) processing times, often result in USCIS completing the adjudication of such petitions at the same time as, or even later than, the date of the petitioner’s need for the worker. This created a hardship for petitioners seeking to employ a worker based on a scheduled performance, competition, or event, and who already may have booked a venue and sold advance tickets. If the petition is not approved by the time of the petitioner’s need for the worker’s services, the petitioner may be required to cancel a scheduled event or performance, lose funds advanced for booking a venue, and be liable for the costs associated with ticket refunds as well as other costs. If petitioners were able to file Forms I-129 for O or P nonimmigrant status more than six months in advance of the need for the worker’s services, the DHS reasoned, USCIS could ensure that the adjudication is completed in advance of the date of the scheduled event, competition, or performance. Moreover, a large percentage of O and P petitioners seeking performers or athletes often must plan for and schedule competitions, events, or performances more than one year in advance.

Of the 112 comments received on the proposed rule published two years ago, 110 comments supported the proposal to extend the allowable petition filing time from the current six months to one year in advance of the petitioning employer’s need for the services of the O or P nonimmigrant. As nearly all comments supported the proposed rule’s extension of the O and P nonimmigrant petition filing period, the final rule provides that petitioners of O and P nonimmigrants may file petitions at any time up to a maximum of one year in advance of their need for the worker’s services. USCIS is not adopting a proposed requirement that petitions must be filed no sooner than six months before the actual need for the worker’s services.

The final rule does not apply the one-year filing timeframe to other nonimmigrant classifications associated with Form I-129. The nature of O and P employment is different from other nonimmigrant visa classifications, the DHS explained. Extending the filing period for other nonimmigrant classifications using Form I-129 “may result in the increased potential for fraud and abuse as well as an increase in case filings where the need for the alien’s services has not fully materialized.”

The final rule is available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/pdf/E7-7134.pdf. Average petition processing times are available at https://egov.immigration.gov/cris/jsps/ptimes.jsp.

Back to Top


3. DHS Revamping Electronic Verification System

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is updating its electronic records system to consolidate information from different systems of records notices and add new sources of data. The update includes Basic Pilot Program information used to determine whether a newly hired employee is authorized to work in the U.S. The notice is available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/E7-6611.htm. Information about the Basic Pilot Program, also called the Employment Verification Program, is at https://www.vis-dhs.com/EmployerRegistration.

The DHS also is creating a new Biometric Storage System. See http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/pdf/07-1643.pdf.

Back to Top


4. “Other Worker” Visa Category Becomes Unavailable; Some Categories Move Forward Significantly

The Department of State’s Visa Bulletin for May 2007 notes that the employment third preference “other worker” category for unskilled workers was expected to reach the annual numerical limit by the end of April. As a result, the category became unavailable beginning in May and will remain so for the remainder of fiscal year 2007.

Also, the Department noted that U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and the Department of Labor still have a significant number of backlogged cases. As a result, an anticipated increase in demand for visa numbers has not yet materialized and may not for some time. In an effort to maximize number use under the annual numerical limit, the Department said, the Worldwide and Philippines employment third preference cut-off dates have advanced by one year, to August 1, 2003. Eligible professionals and skilled workers with priority dates earlier than August 1, 2003, may apply for adjustment of status or consular processing in May. Unless there is a significant increase in employment visa demand, the Department noted, it will be necessary to continue this rate of movement during the upcoming months. Such movement may be expanded to include other chargeability areas and preference categories.

One consequence of rapid cut-off date advancement is the inevitable increase in demand for visa numbers as adjustment of status cases are brought to conclusion at USCIS offices. Such increased demand could have a dramatic impact on the cut-off dates, leading to retrogressions. The Department said it would provide as much advance notice as possible should this occur.

The May 2007 Visa Bulletin, which contains the latest information on visa number availability, is available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3219.html.

Back to Top


5. USCIS Issues Final Rule Removing Standardized Request for Evidence Timeframe

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a final rule, effective June 18, 2007, to provide flexibility to the agency in setting the time allowed to applicants and petitioners to respond to a Request for Evidence (RFE) or to a Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID). Specifically, the final rule maintains the current 12-week standard as a ceiling on the response time to be provided, and sets a maximum of 30 days to respond to a NOID.

The rule also describes the circumstances under which the agency will issue an RFE or NOID before denying an application or petition, but USCIS said it will continue generally to provide petitioners and applicants with the opportunity to review and rebut derogatory information.

The rule also clarifies when petitioners and applicants may submit copies of documents in lieu of originals.

USCIS said it intends to issue policy guidance setting clear standards for when a timeframe less than these maximums will be afforded before the effective date of the rule.

USCIS noted that it recognizes the value of a predictable timeframe for responding to an RFE or NOID, and stated that it did not intend to make this an unpredictable, discretionary process with timeframes determined by individual adjudication officers. USCIS said it will set clear timeframes and standards for submission of different kinds of evidence in different circumstances. The timeframes will be set out in internal guidance to adjudicators. USCIS said it foresees no reason why this guidance also would not be publicly disclosed after it is developed or whenever it is adjusted.

USCIS noted that important processing steps (such as background checks) may need to be repeated if processing extends beyond certain timeframes. Repeating steps may significantly delay the eventual acquisition of an immigration benefit. Longer timeframes can work against a timely response also because applicants and petitioners given almost three months to respond may delay responding simply because they consider that additional time in the U.S. to be a benefit, USCIS pointed out. Recognizing that the majority of applications and petitions are eventually approved, USCIS said it does not want to restrict arbitrarily a reasonable opportunity to submit material to prove eligibility. USCIS added that it recognizes that documents from certain countries other than the U.S. are “occasionally difficult to obtain”; thus, the timeframe flexibility will take into account these situations. Nevertheless, USCIS asserted, most applicants and petitioners can provide required documents in fewer than 12 weeks.

The final rule is available at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/pdf/E7-7228.pdf.

Back to Top


6. Seventh Circuit Finds Labor Dep’t, Not DHS, Decides Job Requirements

In Hoosier Care, Inc., v. Chertoff, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit noted that the DHS’s Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) had ruled that two workers’ college majors were not relevant postsecondary education for prospective positions in a residential care facility for profoundly disabled children and adults, because neither agriculture nor transportation is a field of knowledge that relates to the care of such persons. Relevant majors, the AAO suggested, would include those in such fields as psychology and education. Although the court said that interpretation was not necessarily unreasonable, it noted that the determination of what kind of training is required to classify someone as a “skilled” worker is made by the Department of Labor (DOL), not the DHS, which determines whether the worker satisfies those requirements; that is, whether he or she has the training the DOL believes is required for the job.

The court said it did not know how closely the DOL examines the suitability of the job requirements specified in an employer’s application for labor certification, but that the DHS did not argue that in conducting such an investigation in this case it was simply doing the DOL’s work for it. “If it wants to do that it will have to change its regulation and probably also persuade Congress to change the statute,” the court said, reversing the judgment of the district court and returning the case to the DHS for further proceedings.

The full text of the case is available at http://www.bibdaily.com/pdfs/Hoosier%20Care%207%204-11-07.pdf.

Back to Top


7. Court Finds Jurisdiction to Review Adjustment Application Before Renewal in Removal Proceedings

In Hillcrest Baptist Church v. U.S.A., the plaintiffs filed a complaint for relief after U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services denied their adjustment of status applications. The government moved to dismiss because the plaintiffs had not renewed their applications in removal proceedings and, thus, had not yet exhausted their administrative remedies. The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington concluded, however, that Ninth Circuit precedent supported the finding that the court had jurisdiction to review the USCIS’s denial of adjustment of status.

The full text of the decision is available at http://bibdaily.com/pdfs/Hillcrest 2-23-07.pdf.

Back to Top


8. USCIS Proposes Revisions for Religious Worker Visa Classifications

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is proposing to amend existing regulations pertaining to special immigrant and nonimmigrant religious worker visa classifications. The proposed rule focuses on how the agency can best ensure the integrity of the religious worker program by eliminating opportunities for fraud in the program while, at the same time, streamlining the process for legitimate petitioners.

In 1999, USCIS noted, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported incidents of fraud in the religious worker program. The GAO found that fraud often involved false statements by petitioners about the length of time an applicant was a member of a religious organization, the qualifying work experience, and the position being filled. The GAO also noted problems with applicants making false statements about their individual qualifications and plans while in the U.S.

USCIS has since continued to assess the potential for fraud in the religious worker program. The agency’s Office of Fraud Detection and National Security (FDNS) found a 33 per cent rate of fraud in the program. The FDNS’s assessment also indicated patterns of potential fraud and weaknesses that created vulnerabilities for fraud to occur. Together with the GAO’s earlier report, the FDNS assessment showed a “justifiable and compelling need to address the issue,” USCIS said.

USCIS is proposing a variety of changes, including but not limited to requiring the filing of a petition in every instance (the requirement already exists for special immigrants and for organizations seeking to extend the stay or adjust status for nonimmigrant religious workers already in the U.S.). USCIS said this proposed requirement will allow the agency to verify the legitimacy of the petitioner and the job offer before the issuance of a visa or admission to the U.S. USCIS also would notify petitioners that the agency may conduct on-site inspections of any organization seeking to employ either a nonimmigrant or a special immigrant religious worker. Inspections would be “intended to increase deterrence and detection of fraudulent petitions and to increase the ability of the agency to monitor religious workers and ensure their lawful status in the U.S. is maintained.”

USCIS also is proposing to amend the standard initial period of stay for nonimmigrant religious workers from three years to one. In addition, every petition for an R-1 classification would be required to be initiated by a prospective or existing employer through the filing of a Form I-129 (Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker) with USCIS. The beneficiary (the religious worker) would no longer be able to obtain an R-1 visa at a U.S. consulate abroad or at a port-of-entry without prior approval of the I-129 by USCIS.

In addition, USCIS proposes to change certain related definitions. For example, USCIS proposes to expand its interpretation of prior work experience to include work that is not in the “exact same” position as the job offered. Also, USCIS proposes to expand the definition of “religious occupation” to focus on duties that “primarily, directly, and substantially relate[ ] to the religious beliefs or creed of the denomination.” Such a change, USCIS said, distinguishes between committed religious work and non-qualifying work that, while it may be incident to religious duties, cannot by itself warrant classification in the religious worker category.

Public comments are being accepted until June 25, 2007. For more information, see http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/RvisaRelease19Apr07.pdf (announcement) and http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/RvisaFactSheet19Apr07.pdf (fact sheet).

Back to Top


9. Children in Immigrant Families Generally Fluent in English

A new report finds that children in newcomer families have strong ties to their adopted country. Four out of five are U.S. citizens and three out of four are fluent in English. Children in newcomer families account for 20 percent of all children in the U.S., and their numbers are growing faster than any other group of children in the nation, the report notes.

The report, “Children in America’s Newcomer Families,” by Child Trends and the Center for Social and Demographic Analysis of the University at Albany, State University of New York, is available at http://www.childtrends.org/Files//Child_Trends-2007_04_01_RB_ChildrenImmigrant.pdf. Additional data is available at http://www.albany.edu/csda/children/.

Back to Top


10. TV Personalities Spar Over Immigration

Radio talk-show host Bill O’Reilly recently got into a shouting match with Geraldo Rivera about the hot topic of immigration, which ABIL President Angelo Paparelli noted “demonstrates the intensity of feelings on both sides of the debate.” The TV dust-up began with comments about a drunk-driving accident being caused by an undocumented man from Mexico with a previous record of alcohol-related convictions. Mr. O’Reilly focused on the man’s undocumented status but Mr. Rivera countered that the story was about drunk driving, not immigration. The exchange can be viewed on the blog, Immigration Orange, at http://immigration.campustap.com/blog/chatter/topic/View.aspx?Eid=9ee9eb37-2276-4493-9098-3d792e587218&redirectUrl=%2f&tag=immigration. A spoof on immigration by the Onion News Network (http://www.theonion.com/content/) follows the O’Reilly-Rivera link on the same blog page.
Back to Top


11. Change in Agency Names

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has changed the name of the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and the name of the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). The notice is posted at http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20071800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/pdf/E7-7659.pdf.
Back to Top


12. Map Shows State Ratio of H-1B Applications to Employment

A color-coded map released by Global Insight shows the state-by-state ratios of H-1B applications to employment. The application numbers are broken down by state and then weighted by total employment (to control for size) to show which states are most active in seeking out foreign labor for technical service positions. The company noted that research on H-1B visas is still in an early phase but that regional patterns in labor condition application data show some interesting patterns. Global Insight noted a “clear trend” in coastal states using the H-1B program to a greater degree than inland states.

The map and accompanying report are available at http://www.globalinsight.com/Perspective/PerspectiveDetail9056.htm.

Back to Top


13. Recent News from ABIL Members

Cyrus D. Mehta (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers-mehta.htm) and Stephen Yale-Loehr (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers-loehr.htm) were cited in February 2007 in the Marden memorial lecture, delivered at the New York City Bar by Judge Robert D. Katzmann. The topic was the unmet legal needs of immigrants. The lecture text is available at http://www.nycbar.org/pdf/report/marden9.pdf.

Cyrus Mehta and H. Ronald Klasko (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers-klasko.htm) spoke at a training in April 2007 on PERM labor certification for the New York Chapter of the American Immigration Lawyers Association.

Angelo A. Paparelli (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers-paparelli.htm) was quoted in the New York Times edition of April 14, 2007, on the topic of the random selection process for H-1Bs, the global search for technology talent, and the effect of the H-1B program on U.S. workers. ‘There are penalties, and the Department of Labor really is enforcing these rules,’ said Mr. Paparelli. ‘So where’s the harm [to American workers]?’

Stephen Yale-Loehr (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers-loehr.htm) was quoted in the New York Times edition of April 10, 2007, about President Bush’s comprehensive immigration reform proposal. Mr. Yale-Loehr noted that under the administration’s proposal, some undocumented immigrants might have to wait “decades” before they could get green cards.

Mr. Yale-Loehr testified before the House immigration subcommittee on April 24, 2007, concerning problems in verifying employees’ work eligibility using the current I-9 form and the Basic Pilot Program. Mr. Yale-Loehr noted that up to 20 percent of initial entries in the Basic Pilot Program are false negatives, often due to simple errors like entering the last name as the first name or failing to update a married name. An article summarizing the hearing is at http://www.washingtontechnology.com/online/1_1/30528-1.html.

Ron Klasko was selected by his peers as “the most highly regarded” immigration lawyer in the world, according to The International Who’s Who of Corporate Immigration Lawyers 2007.

The International Educator, the flagship bimonthly magazine of NAFSA: Association of International Educators, recently asked Ron Klasko for ideas on how to help develop its institutional immigration policies for universities.

Ron was quoted extensively in the January/February 2007 issue of the International Educator. Also in that issue is an article Mr. Klasko wrote, “Portability: Freedom of Movement for Foreign National Employees.” The article addresses portability issues for H-1Bs and adjustment of status applicants. The magazine is available by subscription at http://www.nafsa.org/publication.sec/international_educator_1.

Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer LLP has updated its Web site at http://www.klaskolaw.com. The revamped site features an extended immigration glossary along with a plethora of articles. The Calendar section of the site provides for dates and information on where Klasko lawyers will be speaking on immigration law, and copies of the handouts will be posted on the site.

Steve Clark (bio: https://www.abil.com/lawyers-clark.htm) spoke at The Boston Bar Association on Permanent Residence Options for Scholars along with Penny Rosser, Director, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, International Scholar’s Office on April 12, 2007.

Back to Top

https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL https://www.abil.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2007-05-01 00:00:382019-09-19 00:36:48News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 3, No. 5 • May 01, 2007
Page 33 of 35«‹3132333435›»

Archive

  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • August 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • February 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006

ABIL is a corporation with over 40 top-rated immigration law firms and 1,500+ professionals.

News

  • ABIL Immigration Insider • November 2, 2025
  • ABIL Immigration Insider • October 5, 2025
  • ABIL Global Update • October 2025
  • ABIL Immigration Insider • September 7, 2025

Sign Up for our Newsletters

Sign up for our Immigration Insider & Global Updates Newsletters

Select list(s) to subscribe to


By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: . You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact
© Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers (ABIL) All Rights Reserved 2025
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Home
  • About
  • ABIL Lawyers
  • Global Immigration
  • Services
  • Industries
  • Resources
  • Contact
Scroll to top